Misplaced Pages

#192807

44-771: In 2012, an implementation of CoDel was written by Dave Täht and Eric Dumazet for the Linux kernel and dual licensed under the GNU General Public License and the 3-clause BSD license . Dumazet's improvement on CoDel is called FQ-CoDel , standing for "Fair/Flow Queue CoDel"; it was first adopted as the standard AQM and packet scheduling solution in 2014 in the OpenWrt 14.07 release called "Barrier Breaker". From there, CoDel and FQ-CoDel have migrated into various downstream projects such as Tomato , dd-wrt , OPNsense and Ubiquiti 's "Smart Queues" feature. CoDel

88-513: A 1500-byte packet, the largest allowed by Ethernet at the network layer, ties up a 14.4k modem for about one second. Large packets are also problematic in the presence of communications errors. If no forward error correction is used, corruption of a single bit in a packet requires that the entire packet be retransmitted, which can be costly. At a given bit error rate , larger packets are more susceptible to corruption. Their greater payload makes retransmissions of larger packets take longer. Despite

132-416: A better metric might be the minimum queue length during a sliding time window. Based on Jacobson's notion from 2006, CoDel was developed to manage queues under control of the minimum delay experienced by packets in the running buffer window. The goal is to keep this minimum delay below 5 milliseconds. If the minimum delay rises to too high a value, packets are dropped from the queue until the delay drops below

176-495: A buffer has limited capacity. The ideal buffer is sized so it can handle a sudden burst of communication and match the speed of that burst to the speed of the slower network. Ideally, the shock-absorbing situation is characterized by a temporary delay for packets in the buffer during the transmission burst, after which the delay rapidly disappears and the network reaches a balance in offering and handling packets. The TCP congestion control algorithm relies on packet drops to determine

220-438: A communications interface or standard. Some systems may decide MTU at connect time, e.g. using Path MTU Discovery . MTUs apply to communications protocols and network layers . The MTU is specified in terms of bytes or octets of the largest PDU that the layer can pass onwards. MTU parameters usually appear in association with a communications interface ( NIC , serial port , etc.). Standards ( Ethernet , for example) can fix

264-948: A drummer across town", he is a persistent and dedicated explainer of how queues across the internet (and wifi) really work, lecturing at MIT, Stanford, and other internet institutions such as APNIC. In the early stages of the Bufferbloat project he helped prove that applying advanced AQM and Fair Queuing techniques like ( FQ-CoDel ) to network packet flows would break essential assumptions in existing low priority congestion controls such as bittorrent and LEDBAT and further, that it didn't matter. His CeroWrt project showed that advanced algorithms like CoDel , FQ-CoDel , DOCSIS-PIE and Cake were effective at reducing network latency, at no cost in throughput not only at low bandwidths but scaled to 10s of GB/s and could be implemented on inexpensive hardware. CeroWrt project members also helped make OpenWrt ready for IPv6 Launch Day , and pushed all

308-403: A given medium. The size of an IP packet includes IP headers but excludes headers from the link layer. In the case of an Ethernet frame this adds a protocol overhead of 18 bytes, or 22 bytes with an IEEE 802.1Q tag for VLAN tagging or class of service . The MTU should not be confused with the minimum datagram size (in one piece or in fragments) that all hosts must be prepared to accept. This

352-464: A network link between a fast and a slow network, especially at the start of a TCP session, when there is a sudden burst of packets and the slower network may not be able to accept the burst quickly enough. Buffers exist to ease this problem by giving the fast network a place to store packets to be read by the slower network at its own pace. In other words, buffers act like shock absorbers to convert bursty arrivals into smooth, steady departures. However,

396-408: A new reliable MTU. A failure of Path MTU Discovery carries the possible result of making some sites behind badly configured firewalls unreachable. A connection with mismatched MTU may work for low-volume data but fail as soon as a host sends a large block of data. For example, with Internet Relay Chat a connecting client might see the initial messages up to and including the initial ping (sent by

440-484: A particular link layer cannot deliver an IP datagram of 1280 bytes in a single frame, then the link layer must provide its own fragmentation and reassembly mechanism, separate from the IP fragmentation mechanism, to ensure that a 1280-byte IP datagram can be delivered, intact, to the IP layer. In the context of Internet Protocol , MTU refers to the maximum size of an IP packet that can be transmitted without fragmentation over

484-457: Is 576 bytes for IPv4 and 1280 bytes for IPv6 . The IP MTU and Ethernet maximum frame size are configured separately. In Ethernet switch configuration, MTU may refer to Ethernet maximum frame size. In Ethernet-based routers, MTU normally refers to the IP MTU. If jumbo frames are allowed in a network, the IP MTU should also be adjusted upwards to take advantage of this. Since the IP packet

SECTION 10

#1732790108193

528-518: Is a filksinger , often performing songs like "It GPLs me", and "One First Landing" at various computer and science fiction conventions. He serves on the Commons Conservancy board of directors. Maximum transmission unit In computer networking , the maximum transmission unit ( MTU ) is the size of the largest protocol data unit (PDU) that can be communicated in a single network layer transaction. The MTU relates to, but

572-406: Is a Path MTU Discovery technique which responds more robustly to ICMP filtering. In an IP network, the path from the source address to the destination address may change in response to various events ( load-balancing , congestion , outages , etc.) and this could result in the path MTU changing (sometimes repeatedly) during a transmission, which may introduce further packet drops before the host finds

616-419: Is based on observations of packet behavior in packet-switched networks under the influence of data buffers . Some of these observations are about the fundamental nature of queueing and the causes of bufferbloat , others relate to weaknesses of alternative queue management algorithms. CoDel was developed as an attempt to address the problem of bufferbloat. The flow of packets slows down while traveling through

660-481: Is carried by an Ethernet frame, the Ethernet frame has to be larger than the IP packet. With the normal untagged Ethernet frame overhead of 18 bytes and the 1500-byte payload, the Ethernet maximum frame size is 1518 bytes. If a 1500-byte IP packet is to be carried over a tagged Ethernet connection, the Ethernet frame maximum size needs to be 1522 bytes due to the larger size of an 802.1Q tagged frame. 802.3ac increases

704-426: Is dequeued, if the lowest queuing delay for the interval is greater than 5 milliseconds, this single packet is dropped and the interval used for the next group of packets is shortened. If the lowest queuing delay for the interval is less than 5 milliseconds, the packet is forwarded and the interval is reset to 100 milliseconds. When the interval is shortened, it is done so in accordance with the inverse square root of

748-399: Is independently computed at each network hop . The algorithm operates over an interval , initially 100 milliseconds. Per-packet queuing delay is monitored through the hop. As each packet is dequeued for forwarding , the queuing delay (amount of time the packet spent waiting in the queue) is calculated. The lowest queuing delay for the interval is stored. When the last packet of the interval

792-551: Is maximized. A bad queue exhibits bufferbloat. Communication bursts cause the buffer to fill up and stay filled, resulting in low utilization and a constantly high buffer delay. In order to be effective against bufferbloat, a solution in the form of an active queue management (AQM) algorithm must be able to recognize an occurrence of bufferbloat and react by deploying effective countermeasures. Van Jacobson asserted in 2006 that existing algorithms have been using incorrect means of recognizing bufferbloat. Algorithms like RED measure

836-417: Is not identical to the maximum frame size that can be transported on the data link layer , e.g., Ethernet frame . Larger MTU is associated with reduced overhead . Smaller MTU values can reduce network delay . In many cases, MTU is dependent on underlying network capabilities and must be adjusted manually or automatically so as to not exceed these capabilities. MTU parameters may appear in association with

880-526: Is the chief executive officer of TekLibre. Täht co-founded the Bufferbloat Project with Jim Gettys , runs the CeroWrt and Make-Wifi-Fast sub-projects, and referees the bufferbloat related mailing lists and related research activities. With a long running goal of one day building an internet with sufficiently low latency and jitter that "you could plug your piano into the wall and play with

924-512: The 11.x and 10.x code branches in 2016. An implementation is distributed with OpenBSD since version 6.2. Fair/Flow Queue CoDel (FQ-CoDel; fq_codel in Linux code) adds flow queuing to CoDel so that it differentiates between multiple simultaneous connections and works fairly. It gives the first packet in each stream priority, so that small streams can start and finish quickly for better use of network resources. CoDel co-author Van Jacobson recommends

SECTION 20

#1732790108193

968-594: The DOCSIS-PIE AQM during the COVID crisis with observed 8-16x reductions in network latency under load across the millions of user devices tested. In order to complete the make-wifi-fast project, by co-authoring an FCC filing and co-ordinating a worldwide protest with Vint Cerf , and many other early Internet pioneers, Taht successfully fought proposed FCC rules to prohibit the installation of 3rd party firmware on home routers. He has been intensely critical of

1012-491: The HTB (Hierarchy Token Bucket) traffic shaper . It improves over the Linux htb+fq_codel implementation by reducing hash collisions between flows, reducing CPU utilization in traffic shaping, and in a few other ways. In 2022, Dave Täht reviewed the state of fq_codel and sch_cake implementations in the wild. He found that while many systems have switched to either as the default AQM, several implementations have dubious deviations from

1056-454: The IP layer of the destination host knows it should reassemble the packets into the original datagram. All fragments of a packet must arrive for the packet to be considered received. If the network drops any fragment, the entire packet is lost. When the number of packets that must be fragmented or the number of fragments is great, fragmentation can cause unreasonable or unnecessary overhead. For example, various tunneling situations may exceed

1100-693: The MTU becomes small enough to traverse the entire path without fragmentation. Standard Ethernet supports an MTU of 1500 bytes and Ethernet implementation supporting jumbo frames, allow for an MTU up to 9000 bytes. However, border protocols like PPPoE will reduce this. Path MTU Discovery exposes the difference between the MTU seen by Ethernet end-nodes and the Path MTU. Unfortunately, increasing numbers of networks drop ICMP traffic (for example, to prevent denial-of-service attacks ), which prevents path MTU discovery from working. Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery

1144-604: The MTU by very little as they add just a header's worth of data. The addition is small, but each packet now has to be sent in two fragments, the second of which carries very little payload. The same amount of payload is being moved, but every intermediate router has to forward twice as many packets. The Internet Protocol requires that hosts must be able to process IP datagrams of at least 576 bytes (for IPv4) or 1280 bytes (for IPv6). However, this does not preclude link layers with an MTU smaller than this minimum MTU from conveying IP data. For example, according to IPv6's specification, if

1188-515: The academic network research community, extolling open access , open source code and the value of negative and repeatable results. As one of the instigators of the IETF AQM and Packet Scheduling working group, he is the co-author of RFC8290, and a contributor to RFC8289 ( CODEL ), RFC7567, RFC8034, RFC7928, RFC7806, and RFC8033. He also made contributions to the DOCSIS 3.1 standard. He

1232-443: The available bandwidth between two communicating devices. It speeds up the data transfer until packets start to drop, and then slows down the transmission rate. Ideally, it keeps speeding up and slowing down as it finds equilibrium at the speed of the link. For this to work, the packet drops must occur in a timely manner so that the algorithm can responsively select a suitable transfer speed. With packets held in an overly-large buffer,

1276-611: The average queue length and consider it a case of bufferbloat if the average grows too large. Jacobson demonstrated in 2006 that this measurement is not a good metric, as the average queue length rises sharply in the case of a communications burst. The queue can then dissipate quickly (good queue) or become a standing queue (bad queue). Other factors in network traffic can also cause false positives or negatives, causing countermeasures to be deployed unnecessarily. Jacobson suggested that average queue length actually contains no information at all about packet demand or network load. He suggested that

1320-576: The innovations back into open source. His successor Make-Wifi-Fast project solved the WiFi performance anomaly by extending the FQ-Codel algorithm to work on multiple WiFi chips in Linux, reducing latency under load by up to a factor of 50. FQ-CoDel has since become the default network queuing algorithm for Ethernet and Wi-Fi in most Linux distributions, and on iOS, and OSX. It is also widely used in packet shapers. Comcast also successfully rolled out

1364-407: The lowest MTU in a chain of links to other peers. Another potential problem is that higher-level protocols may create packets larger than even the local link supports. IPv4 allows fragmentation which divides the datagram into pieces, each small enough to accommodate a specified MTU limitation. This fragmentation process takes place at the internet layer . The fragmented packets are marked so that

CoDel - Misplaced Pages Continue

1408-440: The maximum level. Nichols and Jacobson cite several advantages to using nothing more than this metric: CoDel does nothing to manage the buffer if the minimum delay for the buffer window is below the maximum allowed value. It also does nothing if the buffer is relatively empty (if there are fewer than one MTU 's worth of bytes in the buffer). If these conditions do not hold, then CoDel drops packets probabilistically. The algorithm

1452-416: The negative effects on retransmission duration, large packets can still have a net positive effect on end-to-end TCP performance. The Internet protocol suite was designed to work over many different networking technologies, each of which may use packets of different sizes. While a host will know the MTU of its own interface and possibly that of its peers (from initial handshakes), it will not initially know

1496-728: The number of successive intervals in which packets were dropped due to excessive queuing delay. The sequence of intervals is 100 {\displaystyle 100} , 100 2 {\displaystyle {100 \over {\sqrt {2}}}} , 100 3 {\displaystyle {100 \over {\sqrt {3}}}} , 100 4 {\displaystyle {100 \over {\sqrt {4}}}} , 100 5 {\displaystyle {100 \over {\sqrt {5}}}} ... CoDel has been tested in simulation tests by Nichols and Jacobson, at different MTUs and link rates and other variations of conditions. In general, results indicate: Simulation

1540-441: The packets will arrive at their destination but with a higher latency but no packets are dropped so TCP does not slow down. Under these conditions, TCP may even decide that the path of the connection has changed and repeat the search for a new equilibrium. Having a big and constantly full buffer that causes increased transmission delays and reduced interactivity, especially when looking at two or more simultaneous transmissions over

1584-504: The path MTU between two IP hosts, defined for both IPv4 and IPv6 . It works by sending packets with the DF (don't fragment) option in the IP header set. Any device along the path whose MTU is smaller than the packet will drop such packets and send back an ICMP Destination Unreachable (Datagram Too Big) message which indicates its MTU. This information allows the source host to reduce its assumed path MTU appropriately. The process repeats until

1628-472: The resulting higher efficiency means an improvement in bulk protocol throughput. A larger MTU also requires processing of fewer packets for the same amount of data. In some systems, per-packet-processing can be a critical performance limitation. However, this gain is not without a downside. Large packets occupy a link for more time than a smaller packet, causing greater delays to subsequent packets, and increasing network delay and delay variation . For example,

1672-430: The same channel, is called bufferbloat. Available channel bandwidth can also end up being unused, as some fast destinations may not be reached due to buffers being clogged with data awaiting delivery to slow destinations. CoDel distinguishes between two types of queue: A good queue is one that exhibits no bufferbloat. Communication bursts cause no more than a temporary increase in queue delay. The network link utilization

1716-505: The server as an anti-spoofing measure), but get no response after that. This is because the large set of welcome messages sent at that point are packets that exceed the path MTU. One can possibly work around this, depending on which part of the network one controls; for example one can change the MSS ( maximum segment size ) in the initial packet that sets up the TCP connection at one's firewall. MTU

1760-693: The size of an MTU; or systems (such as point-to-point serial links) may decide MTU at connect time. Underlying data link and physical layers usually add overhead to the network layer data to be transported, so for a given maximum frame size of a medium, one needs to subtract the amount of overhead to calculate that medium's MTU. For example, with Ethernet, the maximum frame size is 1518 bytes, 18 bytes of which are overhead ( header and frame check sequence ), resulting in an MTU of 1500 bytes. A larger MTU brings greater efficiency because each network packet carries more user data while protocol overheads, such as headers or underlying per-packet delays, remain fixed;

1804-410: The standard Ethernet maximum frame size to accommodate this. The Internet Protocol defines the path MTU of an Internet transmission path as the smallest MTU supported by any of the hops on the path between a source and destination. Put another way, the path MTU is the largest packet size that can traverse this path without suffering fragmentation. Path MTU Discovery is a technique for determining

CoDel - Misplaced Pages Continue

1848-515: The standard. For example, Apple's implementation of fq_codel (default in iOS) has a very large number of users but no "codel" component. Täht also notes the general lack of hardware offloading, made more important by the increase in network traffic brought by the COVID-19 pandemic . Dave T%C3%A4ht Dave Täht (born August 11, 1965) is an American network engineer , musician, lecturer, asteroid exploration advocate, and Internet activist. He

1892-429: The use of fq_codel over codel where it's available. FQ-CoDel is published as RFC8290. It is written by T. Hoeiland-Joergensen, P. McKenney, D. Täht, J. Gettys, and E. Dumazet, all members of the "bufferbloat project". Common Applications Kept Enhanced (CAKE; sch_cake in Linux code) is a combined traffic shaper and AQM algorithm presented by the bufferbloat project in 2018. It builds on the experience of using fq_codel with

1936-597: Was also performed by Greg White and Joey Padden at CableLabs . A full implementation of CoDel was realized in May 2012 and made available as open-source software . It was implemented within the Linux kernel (starting with the 3.5 mainline). Dave Täht back-ported CoDel to Linux kernel 3.3 for project CeroWrt , which concerns itself among other things with bufferbloat, where it was exhaustively tested. CoDel began to appear as an option in some proprietary/turnkey bandwidth management platforms in 2013. FreeBSD had CoDel integrated into

#192807