Misplaced Pages

#131868

34-687: The Mitsubishi AAM-2 was a Japanese prototype for a limited all aspect infrared homing air-to-air missile developed based on the American AIM-4D Falcon missile. It never reached production. In 1968, Japan selected a modified version of the F-4E as the next main future fighter of the Japan Air Self-Defense Force with the possibility to employ the AIM-4D being an important factor of the decision. The development of

68-404: A semi-active radar homing system, the launch platform acquires the target with its search radar . The missile is then powered up while the launch platform's illuminator radar "lights up" the target for it. The illuminator is a radar transmitter with a narrow, focused beam that may be separate from the search radar and that can be directed at a target using information from the search radar. When

102-671: A direct hit was scored. Only five kills were recorded. With the AIM-4's poor kill record rendering the F-4D ineffective at air-to-air combat, the fighters were modified to carry the AIM-9 Sidewinder missile instead, which was already carried on USAF F-4Cs , USN and USMC F-4 Phantom II and F-8 Crusader jet fighters. The Sidewinder was more effective in the fighter vs fighter role on the F-4 platform, and improved versions continue to serve

136-426: A lock on a target) rendered it largely ineffective against maneuvering fighters. Moreover, it could be cooled only once. Limited coolant supply meant that once cooled, the missile would expend its supply of liquid nitrogen in two minutes, rendering it useless on the rail. The missile also had a small warhead, and lacked proximity fusing. As a result, only five kills were scored, all with the AIM-4D version. (The Falcon

170-474: A magazine of three missiles in the rear fuselage, and fire them through a long tube that led through the area that normally held the tail turret. In the case of the B-52 , the missile contained a tuner for the bomber's A-3 rear-facing radar, and would follow the signal being reflected off the target aircraft using a semi-active radar homing (SARH) system. At the same time that the original MX-798 had been released,

204-476: A more powerful, longer-burning rocket engine, increasing speed and range. It had a larger warhead (28.7 lb / 13 kg) and better guidance systems. The SARH versions were GAR-3 ( AIM-4E ) and the improved GAR-3A ( AIM-4F ). The infrared version was the GAR-4A ( AIM-4G ). About 2,700 SARH missiles and 3,400 IR Super Falcons were produced, replacing most earlier versions of the weapon in service. The Falcon

238-575: A range of about 5 mi (8.0 km). About 4,000 missiles were produced. It was replaced in production by the GAR-1D (later AIM-4A ), with larger control surfaces. About 12,000 of this variant were produced, the major production version of the SARH Falcon. The GAR-2 (later AIM-4B ) was a heat-seeker, generally limited to rear-aspect engagements , but with the advantage of being a ' fire and forget ' weapon. As would also be Soviet practice, it

272-471: A specification for a forward-firing missile for fighter aircraft had been released as MX-799. This had progressed to the point of testing prototype rounds, as the AAM-A-1 Firebird , when its subsonic speed and manual guidance were realized to be serious problems. The project was cancelled, and the recently released MX-904 was redirected to replace Firebird in the anti-bomber role. At this stage

306-484: Is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . AIM-4 Falcon Produced in both heat-seeking and radar-guided versions, the missile served during the Vietnam War with USAF McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II units. Designed to shoot down slow bombers with limited maneuverability, it was ineffective against maneuverable fighters over Vietnam . Lacking proximity fusing , the missile would detonate only if

340-562: The GAR-9 (later AIM-47 Falcon ). The Air Force deployed AIM-4 in May 1967 during the Vietnam War on the new F-4D Phantom II , which carried it on the inner wing pylons and was not wired to carry the AIM-9 Sidewinder . The missile's combat performance was very poor. The Falcon, already operational on Air Defense Command aircraft, was designed to be used against bombers, and its slow seeker cooling times (as much as six or seven seconds to obtain

374-818: The Swiss Air Force for use on the Dassault Mirage III S, and license-manufactured in Sweden for the Swedish Air Force (as the Rb 28 ) to equip the Saab 35 Draken and 37 Viggen . The seeker of the missile was also redesigned. The AIM-4F/AIM-4G Super Falcon remained in USAF and ANG service, primarily with Convair F-102 Delta Dagger and F-106 Delta Dart interceptors, until the final retirement of

SECTION 10

#1732782628132

408-719: The XAIM-4H , which had a laser proximity fuze , new warhead, and better maneuverability. It was cancelled the following year without entering service. A larger version of the Falcon carrying a 0.25-kiloton nuclear warhead was developed as the GAR-11 (later designated the AIM-26 Falcon ), while a long-range version was developed for the North American XF-108 Rapier and Lockheed YF-12 interceptors as

442-407: The passive radar of the missile's guidance system is able to "see"/detect the radio waves reflected from the target, missile lock-on is achieved and the weapon is ready to be launched. The subject of a radar lock-on may become aware of the fact that it is being actively targeted by virtue of the electro-magnetic emissions of the tracking system, notably the illuminator. This condition will present

476-533: The pulse repetition frequency . This led to the introduction of radar warning receivers that would notice this change and provide a warning to the operator. Modern radar systems do not have a lock-on system in the traditional sense; tracking is provided by storing radar signals in computer memory and comparing them from scan to scan using algorithms to determine which signals correspond to single targets. These systems do not change their signals while tracking targets, and thus do not reveal they are locked-on. With

510-457: The B-52 and would be somewhere fairly close to directly behind the aircraft. In the case of a fighter, the target might not be so conveniently located, and with no way to know if it could see the target while inside the tube, this meant it might never lock-on properly. Eventually, it was decided to abandon the tube-launched concept and mount the missile on the wings or in weapon bays that would point

544-514: The F-106 in 1988. These aircraft had been designed to carry the weapon and could not be easily converted to carry larger weapons like the AIM-9 Sidewinder or AIM-7 Sparrow , which were much longer. Related Development: Radar lock-on Lock-on is a feature of many radar systems that allow it to automatically follow a selected target. Lock-on was first designed for the AI Mk. IX radar in

578-577: The F-4Ds to carry more reliable AIM-9 Sidewinders. Although it was an unauthorized field modification, the entire air force eventually followed his example. Used from 1965 through 1972 in Vietnam, Falcons achieved their only kills during Operation Rolling Thunder (1965–68) , with only 5 successful hits scored after 54 launches in aerial combat. The AIM-4 was also produced as the HM-55S (radar-guided) for

612-591: The Falcon. Canada also hoped to use them on the Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow interceptor; however, this was never realized because of the Arrow's cancellation. Fighters carrying the Falcon were often designed with internal weapons bays for carrying this missile. The Scorpion carried them on wingtip pods, while the Delta Dagger and Delta Dart had belly bays with a trapeze mechanism to move them into

646-526: The UK, where it was known as lock-follow or auto-follow . Its first operational use was in the US ground-based SCR-584 radar , which demonstrated the ability to easily track almost any airborne target, from aircraft to artillery shells. In the post-WWII era, the term became more widely used in connection to missile guidance concepts. Many modern anti-aircraft missiles use some form of semi-active radar homing , where

680-537: The XAAM-2 was started in 1970 as an air-to-air missile for the newly acquired F-4EJ . It was developed by the Technical Research and Development Institute and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, aiming to exceed the performance of the original AIM-4D . The guidance system used infrared homing like the AIM-4D, but improved to a limited all-aspect infrared homing with the ability to attack from the front and side of

714-671: The airstream for launch. The F-101B had an unusual bay arrangement where two were stored externally, and then the bay door would rotate to expose two more missiles. It is likely the General Dynamics F-111 's internal bay would have accommodated the missile as well, but by the time of service the Air Force had already dropped the Falcon for use against fighters, as well as the idea of using the F-111 as an air combat fighter. The GAR-1 had semi-active radar homing (SARH), giving

SECTION 20

#1732782628132

748-472: The armed forces of the United States and numerous allied nations to this day. Development of a guided air-to-air missile began in 1946. Hughes Aircraft was awarded a contract for a subsonic missile under the project designation MX-798 , which soon gave way to the supersonic MX-904 in 1947. The original purpose of the weapon was as a self-defense weapon for bomber aircraft , which would carry

782-475: The enemy aircraft with the reliability of electronic devices also improved. The missile employed a higher performance rocket motor expanding its range. In addition, the warhead power was increased compared to the AIM-4D, and it was equipped with a proximity fuze, solving major issues of the AIM-4D, such as the small warhead and the lack of a proximity fuze. Therefore, although the AAM-2 is very similar in appearance to

816-406: The four I had (already) selected and couldn't tell which of the remaining was perking and which head was already expiring on its launch rail. Twice upon returning to base I had the tech rep go over the switchology and firing sequences. We never discovered I was doing anything wrong. Colonel Olds became exasperated with the Falcon's poor combat performance. He ordered his entire fighter wing to rewire

850-428: The infrared-homing Falcons were built. All of the early Falcons had a small 7.6 lb (3.4 kg) warhead, limiting their lethal radius. Also limiting them tactically was that Falcon lacked a proximity fuze : the fuzing for the missile was in the leading edges of the wings, requiring a direct hit to detonate. In 1958, Hughes introduced a slightly enlarged version of the Falcon, initially dubbed Super Falcon , with

884-512: The missile and said of it: By the beginning of June, we all hated the new AIM-4 Falcon missiles. I loathed the damned useless things. I wanted my Sidewinders back. In two missions I had fired seven or eight of the bloody things and not one guided. They were worse than I had anticipated. Sometimes they refused to launch; sometimes they just cruised off into the blue without guiding. In the thick of an engagement with my head twisting and turning, trying to keep track of friend and foe, I'd forget which of

918-453: The missile at the target prior to launch. This change also allowed the seeker to use infrared homing as well as SARH. Interchangeable seekers were developed, allowing an aircraft to carry either type, or both. Additionally, freed from the tube, the missile's wings were allowed to grow larger and took on the long delta form that it and its various descendants would carry into the 2000s. The first test firings took place in 1949, at which time it

952-437: The missile seeker listens for reflections of the launch platform's main radar. To provide a continuous signal, the radar is locked-onto the target, following it throughout the missile's flight. Ships and surface-to-air missiles often have a dedicated illuminator radar for this purpose. In older radar systems, through the 1980s, lock-on was normally assisted by a change in the radar signal characteristics , often by increasing

986-477: The model AIM-4, it employed a different motor, warhead and guidance system. While being successfully tested, the AAM-2 never entered production due to higher cost compared to the American-made AIM-4D, with a high surplus stock after the Vietnam War . Japan rather imported the AIM-4D to equip its F-4EJ aircraft. The development of XAAM-2 was discontinued in 1975. This article relating to missiles

1020-515: The weapon was still designed to be fired out of a tube, now leading from a weapon bay behind the nose-mounted radar with the launch tube exiting below the radar antenna. Instead of a magazine with multiple missiles, three missiles were placed in the tube tip-to-tail. Housing in a tube presented several problems, but primary among them was that there was no way for the missile's seeker to lock-on before launch. The original concept would be firing against interceptor aircraft that were slowly approaching

1054-711: Was also experimentally fired by the F-102 Delta Dagger against ground targets at night using its infrared seeker.) The weapon was unpopular with pilots from the onset and was supplemented or partially withdrawn in 1969, to be replaced in the F-4D by the Sidewinder after retrofitting the proper wiring. Colonel Robin Olds , USAF, commanding the F-4D-equipped 8th Tactical Fighter Wing , was an outspoken critic of

AAM-2 - Misplaced Pages Continue

1088-495: Was common to fire the weapon in salvos of both types to increase the chances of a hit (a heat-seeking missile fired first, followed moments later by a radar-guided missile). The GAR-2 was about 1.5 in (40 mm) longer and 16 lb (7 kg) heavier than its SARH counterpart. Its range was similar. It was replaced in production by the GAR-2A (later AIM-4C ), with a more sensitive infrared seeker . A total of about 26,000 of

1122-678: Was designated AAM-A-2 and given the popular name Falcon . A brief policy of assigning fighter and bomber designations to missiles led it to be redesignated F-98 in 1951. In 1955, the policy changed again, and the missile was again redesignated GAR-1 . The initial GAR-1 and GAR-2 models entered service in 1956. It armed the Northrop F-89 Scorpion , McDonnell F-101B Voodoo and Convair F-102 Delta Dagger and F-106 Delta Dart interceptors . The only other users were Canada, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland, whose CF-101 Voodoo , Saab 35 Draken and Dassault Mirage III S carried

1156-577: Was redesignated AIM-4 in September 1962. The final version of the original Falcon was the GAR-2B (later AIM-4D ), which entered service in 1963. This was intended as a fighter combat weapon, combining the lighter, smaller airframe of the earlier GAR-1/GAR-2 weapon with the improved IR seeker of the GAR-4A/AIM-4G. An effort to address the limitations of AIM-4D led to the development in 1970 of

#131868