107-783: ARM (stylised in lowercase as arm , formerly an acronym for Advanced RISC Machines and originally Acorn RISC Machine ) is a family of RISC instruction set architectures (ISAs) for computer processors . Arm Holdings develops the ISAs and licenses them to other companies, who build the physical devices that use the instruction set. It also designs and licenses cores that implement these ISAs. Due to their low costs, low power consumption, and low heat generation, ARM processors are useful for light, portable, battery-powered devices, including smartphones , laptops , and tablet computers , as well as embedded systems . However, ARM processors are also used for desktops and servers , including Fugaku ,
214-606: A Harvard memory model , where the instruction stream and the data stream are conceptually separated; this means that modifying the memory where code is held might not have any effect on the instructions executed by the processor (because the CPU has a separate instruction and data cache ), at least until a special synchronization instruction is issued; CISC processors that have separate instruction and data caches generally keep them synchronized automatically, for backwards compatibility with older processors. Many early RISC designs also shared
321-750: A 24-bit high-speed processor to use as the basis for a digital telephone switch . To reach their goal of switching 1 million calls per hour (300 per second) they calculated that the CPU required performance on the order of 12 million instructions per second (MIPS), compared to their fastest mainframe machine of the time, the 370/168 , which performed at 3.5 MIPS. The design was based on a study of IBM's extensive collection of statistics gathered from their customers. This demonstrated that code in high-performance settings made extensive use of processor registers , and that they often ran out of them. This suggested that additional registers would improve performance. Additionally, they noticed that compilers generally ignored
428-459: A 5-bit number, for 15 bits. If one of these registers is replaced by an immediate, there is still lots of room to encode the two remaining registers and the opcode. Common instructions found in multi-word systems, like INC and DEC , which reduce the number of words that have to be read before performing the instruction, are unnecessary in RISC as they can be accomplished with a single register and
535-524: A barebones core sufficient for a small embedded processor to supercomputer and cloud computing use with standard and chip designer–defined extensions and coprocessors. It has been tested in silicon design with the ROCKET SoC , which is also available as an open-source processor generator in the CHISEL language. In the early 1980s, significant uncertainties surrounded the RISC concept. One concern involved
642-400: A better balancing of pipeline stages than before, making RISC pipelines significantly more efficient and allowing higher clock frequencies . Yet another impetus of both RISC and other designs came from practical measurements on real-world programs. Andrew Tanenbaum summed up many of these, demonstrating that processors often had oversized immediates. For instance, he showed that 98% of all
749-858: A customer reaches foundry tapeout or prototyping. 75% of ARM's most recent IP over the last two years are included in ARM Flexible Access. As of October 2019: Arm provides a list of vendors who implement ARM cores in their design (application specific standard products (ASSP), microprocessor and microcontrollers). ARM cores are used in a number of products, particularly PDAs and smartphones . Some computing examples are Microsoft 's first generation Surface , Surface 2 and Pocket PC devices (following 2002 ), Apple 's iPads , and Asus 's Eee Pad Transformer tablet computers , and several Chromebook laptops. Others include Apple's iPhone smartphones and iPod portable media players , Canon PowerShot digital cameras , Nintendo Switch hybrid,
856-817: A design service foundry offers lower overall pricing (through subsidisation of the licence fee). For high volume mass-produced parts, the long term cost reduction achievable through lower wafer pricing reduces the impact of ARM's NRE ( non-recurring engineering ) costs, making the dedicated foundry a better choice. Companies that have developed chips with cores designed by Arm include Amazon.com 's Annapurna Labs subsidiary, Analog Devices , Apple , AppliedMicro (now: MACOM Technology Solutions ), Atmel , Broadcom , Cavium , Cypress Semiconductor , Freescale Semiconductor (now NXP Semiconductors ), Huawei , Intel , Maxim Integrated , Nvidia , NXP , Qualcomm , Renesas , Samsung Electronics , ST Microelectronics , Texas Instruments , and Xilinx . In February 2016, ARM announced
963-452: A different opcode. In contrast, a 32-bit machine has ample room to encode an immediate value, and doing so avoids the need to do a second memory read to pick up the value. This is why many RISC processors allow a 12- or 13-bit constant to be encoded directly into the instruction word. Assuming a 13-bit constant area, as is the case in the MIPS and RISC designs, another 19 bits are available for
1070-552: A merchant foundry that holds an ARM licence, such as Samsung or Fujitsu, can offer fab customers reduced licensing costs. In exchange for acquiring the ARM core through the foundry's in-house design services, the customer can reduce or eliminate payment of ARM's upfront licence fee. Compared to dedicated semiconductor foundries (such as TSMC and UMC ) without in-house design services, Fujitsu/Samsung charge two- to three-times more per manufactured wafer . For low to mid volume applications,
1177-493: A number of additional points. Among these was the fact that programs spent a significant amount of time performing subroutine calls and returns, and it seemed there was the potential to improve overall performance by speeding these calls. This led the Berkeley design to select a method known as register windows which can significantly improve subroutine performance although at the cost of some complexity. They also noticed that
SECTION 10
#17327840168211284-598: A paper on ways to improve microcoding, but later changed his mind and decided microcode itself was the problem. With funding from the DARPA VLSI Program , Patterson started the Berkeley RISC effort. The Program, practically unknown today, led to a huge number of advances in chip design, fabrication, and even computer graphics. Considering a variety of programs from their BSD Unix variant, the Berkeley team found, as had IBM, that most programs made no use of
1391-484: A particular strategy for implementing some RISC designs, and modern RISC designs generally do away with it (such as PowerPC and more recent versions of SPARC and MIPS). Some aspects attributed to the first RISC- labeled designs around 1975 include the observations that the memory-restricted compilers of the time were often unable to take advantage of features intended to facilitate manual assembly coding, and that complex addressing modes take many cycles to perform due to
1498-413: A pipelined processor and for code generation by an optimizing compiler. A common misunderstanding of the phrase "reduced instruction set computer" is that instructions are simply eliminated, resulting in a smaller set of instructions. In fact, over the years, RISC instruction sets have grown in size, and today many of them have a larger set of instructions than many CISC CPUs. Some RISC processors such as
1605-509: A quirk of the 6502's design, the CPU left the memory untouched for half of the time. Thus by running the CPU at 1 MHz, the video system could read data during those down times, taking up the total 2 MHz bandwidth of the RAM. In the BBC Micro, the use of 4 MHz RAM allowed the same technique to be used, but running at twice the speed. This allowed it to outperform any similar machine on
1712-455: A ready-to-manufacture verified semiconductor intellectual property core . For these customers, Arm Holdings delivers a gate netlist description of the chosen ARM core, along with an abstracted simulation model and test programs to aid design integration and verification. More ambitious customers, including integrated device manufacturers (IDM) and foundry operators, choose to acquire the processor IP in synthesizable RTL ( Verilog ) form. With
1819-469: A reasonably sized constant in a 32-bit instruction word. Since many real-world programs spend most of their time executing simple operations, some researchers decided to focus on making those operations as fast as possible. The clock rate of a CPU is limited by the time it takes to execute the slowest sub-operation of any instruction; decreasing that cycle-time often accelerates the execution of other instructions. The focus on "reduced instructions" led to
1926-506: A sequence of simpler internal instructions. In the 68k, a full 1 ⁄ 3 of the transistors were used for this microcoding. In 1979, David Patterson was sent on a sabbatical from the University of California, Berkeley to help DEC's west-coast team improve the VAX microcode. Patterson was struck by the complexity of the coding process and concluded it was untenable. He first wrote
2033-503: A sequence of simpler operations doing the same thing. This was in part an effect of the fact that many designs were rushed, with little time to optimize or tune every instruction; only those used most often were optimized, and a sequence of those instructions could be faster than a less-tuned instruction performing an equivalent operation as that sequence. One infamous example was the VAX 's INDEX instruction. The Berkeley work also turned up
2140-683: A simple chip design could nevertheless have extremely high performance, much higher than the latest 32-bit designs on the market. The second was a visit by Steve Furber and Sophie Wilson to the Western Design Center , a company run by Bill Mensch and his sister, which had become the logical successor to the MOS team and was offering new versions like the WDC 65C02 . The Acorn team saw high school students producing chip layouts on Apple II machines, which suggested that anyone could do it. In contrast,
2247-457: A single complex instruction such as STRING MOVE , but hide those details from the compiler. The internal operations of a RISC processor are "exposed to the compiler", leading to the backronym 'Relegate Interesting Stuff to the Compiler'. Most RISC architectures have fixed-length instructions and a simple encoding, which simplifies fetch, decode, and issue logic considerably. This is among
SECTION 20
#17327840168212354-482: A single data memory cycle—compared to the "complex instructions" of CISC CPUs that may require dozens of data memory cycles in order to execute a single instruction. The term load–store architecture is sometimes preferred. Another way of looking at the RISC/CISC debate is to consider what is exposed to the compiler. In a CISC processor, the hardware may internally use registers and flag bit in order to implement
2461-434: A special case; not only are they allowed to sell finished silicon containing ARM cores, they generally hold the right to re-manufacture ARM cores for other customers. Arm Holdings prices its IP based on perceived value. Lower performing ARM cores typically have lower licence costs than higher performing cores. In implementation terms, a synthesisable core costs more than a hard macro (blackbox) core. Complicating price matters,
2568-825: A variety of licensing terms, varying in cost and deliverables. Arm Holdings provides to all licensees an integratable hardware description of the ARM core as well as complete software development toolset ( compiler , debugger , software development kit ), and the right to sell manufactured silicon containing the ARM CPU. SoC packages integrating ARM's core designs include Nvidia Tegra's first three generations, CSR plc's Quatro family, ST-Ericsson's Nova and NovaThor, Silicon Labs's Precision32 MCU, Texas Instruments's OMAP products, Samsung's Hummingbird and Exynos products, Apple's A4 , A5 , and A5X , and NXP 's i.MX . Fabless licensees, who wish to integrate an ARM core into their own chip design, are usually only interested in acquiring
2675-613: A very small set of instructions—but these designs are very different from classic RISC designs, so they have been given other names such as minimal instruction set computer (MISC) or transport triggered architecture (TTA). RISC architectures have traditionally had few successes in the desktop PC and commodity server markets, where the x86 -based platforms remain the dominant processor architecture. However, this may change, as ARM-based processors are being developed for higher performance systems. Manufacturers including Cavium , AMD, and Qualcomm have released server processors based on
2782-475: A visit to another design firm working on modern 32-bit CPU revealed a team with over a dozen members who were already on revision H of their design and yet it still contained bugs. This cemented their late 1983 decision to begin their own CPU design, the Acorn RISC Machine. The original Berkeley RISC designs were in some sense teaching systems, not designed specifically for outright performance. To
2889-432: Is a computer architecture designed to simplify the individual instructions given to the computer to accomplish tasks. Compared to the instructions given to a complex instruction set computer (CISC), a RISC computer might require more instructions (more code) in order to accomplish a task because the individual instructions are written in simpler code. The goal is to offset the need to process more instructions by increasing
2996-550: The Adapteva Epiphany , have an optional short, feature-reduced compressed instruction set . Generally, these instructions expose a smaller number of registers and fewer bits for immediate values, and often use a two-operand format to eliminate one register number from instructions. A two-operand format in a system with 16 registers requires 8 bits for register numbers, leaving another 8 for an opcode or other uses. The SH5 also follows this pattern, albeit having evolved in
3103-623: The DEC Alpha , AMD Am29000 , Intel i860 and i960 , Motorola 88000 , IBM POWER , and, slightly later, the IBM/Apple/Motorola PowerPC . Many of these have since disappeared due to them often offering no competitive advantage over others of the same era. Those that remain are often used only in niche markets or as parts of other systems; of the designs from these traditional vendors, only SPARC and POWER have any significant remaining market. The ARM architecture has been
3210-555: The Fugaku . A number of systems, going back to the 1960s, have been credited as the first RISC architecture, partly based on their use of the load–store approach. The term RISC was coined by David Patterson of the Berkeley RISC project, although somewhat similar concepts had appeared before. The CDC 6600 designed by Seymour Cray in 1964 used a load–store architecture with only two addressing modes (register+register, and register+immediate constant) and 74 operation codes, with
3317-529: The RT PC —was less competitive than others, but the success of SPARC renewed interest within IBM, which released new RISC systems by 1990 and by 1995 RISC processors were the foundation of a $ 15 billion server industry. By the later 1980s, the new RISC designs were easily outperforming all traditional designs by a wide margin. At that point, all of the other vendors began RISC efforts of their own. Among these were
ARM architecture family - Misplaced Pages Continue
3424-472: The Sun SPARC and MIPS R2000 RISC-based workstations . Further, as the CPU was designed for high-speed I/O, it dispensed with many of the support chips seen in these machines; notably, it lacked any dedicated direct memory access (DMA) controller which was often found on workstations. The graphics system was also simplified based on the same set of underlying assumptions about memory and timing. The result
3531-688: The Wii security processor and 3DS handheld game consoles , and TomTom turn-by-turn navigation systems . In 2005, Arm took part in the development of Manchester University 's computer SpiNNaker , which used ARM cores to simulate the human brain . ARM chips are also used in Raspberry Pi , BeagleBoard , BeagleBone , PandaBoard , and other single-board computers , because they are very small, inexpensive, and consume very little power. The 32-bit ARM architecture ( ARM32 ), such as ARMv7-A (implementing AArch32; see section on Armv8-A for more on it),
3638-405: The "S-cycles", that could be used to fill or save multiple registers in a single page using page mode. This doubled memory performance when they could be used, and was especially important for graphics performance. The Berkeley RISC designs used register windows to reduce the number of register saves and restores performed in procedure calls ; the ARM design did not adopt this. Wilson developed
3745-446: The "silicon partner", as they were a source of ROMs and custom chips for Acorn. Acorn provided the design and VLSI provided the layout and production. The first samples of ARM silicon worked properly when first received and tested on 26 April 1985. Known as ARM1, these versions ran at 6 MHz. The first ARM application was as a second processor for the BBC Micro, where it helped in developing simulation software to finish development of
3852-561: The 2 MIPS of the PS/2 70, with its Intel 386 DX @ 16 MHz. A successor, ARM3, was produced with a 4 KB cache, which further improved performance. The address bus was extended to 32 bits in the ARM6, but program code still had to lie within the first 64 MB of memory in 26-bit compatibility mode, due to the reserved bits for the status flags. In the late 1980s, Apple Computer and VLSI Technology started working with Acorn on newer versions of
3959-465: The 32-bit ARM architecture was the most widely used architecture in mobile devices and the most popular 32-bit one in embedded systems. In 2013, 10 billion were produced and "ARM-based chips are found in nearly 60 percent of the world's mobile devices". Arm Holdings's primary business is selling IP cores , which licensees use to create microcontrollers (MCUs), CPUs , and systems-on-chips based on those cores. The original design manufacturer combines
4066-658: The ARM architecture. ARM further partnered with Cray in 2017 to produce an ARM-based supercomputer. On the desktop, Microsoft announced that it planned to support the PC version of Windows 10 on Qualcomm Snapdragon -based devices in 2017 as part of its partnership with Qualcomm. These devices will support Windows applications compiled for 32-bit x86 via an x86 processor emulator that translates 32-bit x86 code to ARM64 code . Apple announced they will transition their Mac desktop and laptop computers from Intel processors to internally developed ARM64-based SoCs called Apple silicon ;
4173-457: The ARM core remained essentially the same throughout these changes; ARM2 had 30,000 transistors, while ARM6 grew only to 35,000. In 2005, about 98% of all mobile phones sold used at least one ARM processor. In 2010, producers of chips based on ARM architectures reported shipments of 6.1 billion ARM-based processors , representing 95% of smartphones , 35% of digital televisions and set-top boxes , and 10% of mobile computers . In 2011,
4280-763: The ARM core with other parts to produce a complete device, typically one that can be built in existing semiconductor fabrication plants (fabs) at low cost and still deliver substantial performance. The most successful implementation has been the ARM7TDMI with hundreds of millions sold. Atmel has been a precursor design center in the ARM7TDMI-based embedded system. The ARM architectures used in smartphones, PDAs and other mobile devices range from ARMv5 to ARMv8-A . In 2009, some manufacturers introduced netbooks based on ARM architecture CPUs, in direct competition with netbooks based on Intel Atom . Arm Holdings offers
4387-565: The ARM core. In 1990, Acorn spun off the design team into a new company named Advanced RISC Machines Ltd., which became ARM Ltd. when its parent company, Arm Holdings plc, floated on the London Stock Exchange and Nasdaq in 1998. The new Apple–ARM work would eventually evolve into the ARM6, first released in early 1992. Apple used the ARM6-based ARM610 as the basis for their Apple Newton PDA. In 1994, Acorn used
ARM architecture family - Misplaced Pages Continue
4494-584: The ARM instruction sets. These cores must comply fully with the ARM architecture. Companies that have designed cores that implement an ARM architecture include Apple, AppliedMicro (now: Ampere Computing ), Broadcom, Cavium (now: Marvell), Digital Equipment Corporation , Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Samsung Electronics, Fujitsu , and NUVIA Inc. (acquired by Qualcomm in 2021). On 16 July 2019, ARM announced ARM Flexible Access. ARM Flexible Access provides unlimited access to included ARM intellectual property (IP) for development. Per product licence fees are required once
4601-564: The ARM2 design running at 8 MHz, and the early 1987 speed-bumped version at 10 to 12 MHz. A significant change in the underlying architecture was the addition of a Booth multiplier , whereas formerly multiplication had to be carried out in software. Further, a new Fast Interrupt reQuest mode, FIQ for short, allowed registers 8 through 14 to be replaced as part of the interrupt itself. This meant FIQ requests did not have to save out their registers, further speeding interrupts. The first use of
4708-622: The ARM2 was the Acorn Archimedes personal computer models A305, A310, and A440 launched in 1987. According to the Dhrystone benchmark, the ARM2 was roughly seven times the performance of a typical 7 MHz 68000-based system like the Amiga or Macintosh SE . It was twice as fast as an Intel 80386 running at 16 MHz, and about the same speed as a multi-processor VAX-11/784 superminicomputer . The only systems that beat it were
4815-736: The ARM610 as the main central processing unit (CPU) in their RiscPC computers. DEC licensed the ARMv4 architecture and produced the StrongARM . At 233 MHz , this CPU drew only one watt (newer versions draw far less). This work was later passed to Intel as part of a lawsuit settlement, and Intel took the opportunity to supplement their i960 line with the StrongARM. Intel later developed its own high performance implementation named XScale , which it has since sold to Marvell . Transistor count of
4922-597: The Berkeley RISC-II system. The US government Committee on Innovations in Computing and Communications credits the acceptance of the viability of the RISC concept to the success of the SPARC system. By 1989 many RISC CPUs were available; competition lowered their price to $ 10 per MIPS in large quantities, much less expensive than the sole sourced Intel 80386 . The performance of IBM's RISC CPU—only available in
5029-581: The Built on ARM Cortex Technology licence, often shortened to Built on Cortex (BoC) licence. This licence allows companies to partner with ARM and make modifications to ARM Cortex designs. These design modifications will not be shared with other companies. These semi-custom core designs also have brand freedom, for example Kryo 280 . Companies that are current licensees of Built on ARM Cortex Technology include Qualcomm . Companies can also obtain an ARM architectural licence for designing their own CPU cores using
5136-418: The CPU can be in only one mode, but it can switch modes due to external events (interrupts) or programmatically. The original (and subsequent) ARM implementation was hardwired without microcode , like the much simpler 8-bit 6502 processor used in prior Acorn microcomputers. The 32-bit ARM architecture (and the 64-bit architecture for the most part) includes the following RISC features: To compensate for
5243-400: The CPU designs available. Their conclusion about the existing 16-bit designs was that they were a lot more expensive and were still "a bit crap", offering only slightly higher performance than their BBC Micro design. They also almost always demanded a large number of support chips to operate even at that level, which drove up the cost of the computer as a whole. These systems would simply not hit
5350-448: The ISA, who in partnership with TI, GEC, Sharp, Nokia, Oracle and Digital would develop low-power and embedded RISC designs, and target those market segments, which at the time were niche. With the rise in mobile, automotive, streaming, smart device computing, ARM became the most widely used ISA, the company estimating almost half of all CPUs shipped in history have been ARM. Confusion around
5457-610: The PC and the status flags. This decision halved the interrupt overhead. Another change, and among the most important in terms of practical real-world performance, was the modification of the instruction set to take advantage of page mode DRAM . Recently introduced, page mode allowed subsequent accesses of memory to run twice as fast if they were roughly in the same location, or "page", in the DRAM chip. Berkeley's design did not consider page mode and treated all memory equally. The ARM design added special vector-like memory access instructions,
SECTION 50
#17327840168215564-592: The PowerPC have instruction sets as large as the CISC IBM System/370 , for example; conversely, the DEC PDP-8 —clearly a CISC CPU because many of its instructions involve multiple memory accesses—has only 8 basic instructions and a few extended instructions. The term "reduced" in that phrase was intended to describe the fact that the amount of work any single instruction accomplishes is reduced—at most
5671-571: The RISC's basic register-heavy and load/store concepts, ARM added a number of the well-received design notes of the 6502. Primary among them was the ability to quickly serve interrupts , which allowed the machines to offer reasonable input/output performance with no added external hardware. To offer interrupts with similar performance as the 6502, the ARM design limited its physical address space to 64 MB of total addressable space, requiring 26 bits of address. As instructions were 4 bytes (32 bits) long, and required to be aligned on 4-byte boundaries,
5778-535: The VAX. They followed this up with the 40,760-transistor, 39-instruction RISC-II in 1983, which ran over three times as fast as RISC-I. As the RISC project began to become known in Silicon Valley , a similar project began at Stanford University in 1981. This MIPS project grew out of a graduate course by John L. Hennessy , produced a functioning system in 1983, and could run simple programs by 1984. The MIPS approach emphasized an aggressive clock cycle and
5885-675: The addition of simultaneous multithreading (SMT) for improved performance or fault tolerance . Acorn Computers ' first widely successful design was the BBC Micro , introduced in December 1981. This was a relatively conventional machine based on the MOS Technology 6502 CPU but ran at roughly double the performance of competing designs like the Apple II due to its use of faster dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). Typical DRAM of
5992-660: The architecture, ARMv7, defines three architecture "profiles": Although the architecture profiles were first defined for ARMv7, ARM subsequently defined the ARMv6-M architecture (used by the Cortex M0 / M0+ / M1 ) as a subset of the ARMv7-M profile with fewer instructions. Except in the M-profile, the 32-bit ARM architecture specifies several CPU modes, depending on the implemented architecture features. At any moment in time,
6099-609: The basic clock cycle being 10 times faster than the memory access time. Partly due to the optimized load–store architecture of the CDC 6600, Jack Dongarra says that it can be considered a forerunner of modern RISC systems, although a number of other technical barriers needed to be overcome for the development of a modern RISC system. Michael J. Flynn views the first RISC system as the IBM 801 design, begun in 1975 by John Cocke and completed in 1980. The 801 developed out of an effort to build
6206-472: The characteristic of having a branch delay slot , an instruction space immediately following a jump or branch. The instruction in this space is executed, whether or not the branch is taken (in other words the effect of the branch is delayed). This instruction keeps the ALU of the CPU busy for the extra time normally needed to perform a branch. Nowadays the branch delay slot is considered an unfortunate side effect of
6313-421: The code for the register-register instructions (for performing arithmetic and tests) are separate from the instructions that access the main memory of the computer. The design of the CPU allows RISC computers few simple addressing modes and predictable instruction times that simplify design of the system as a whole. The conceptual developments of the RISC computer architecture began with the IBM 801 project in
6420-441: The constants in a program would fit in 13 bits , yet many CPU designs dedicated 16 or 32 bits to store them. This suggests that, to reduce the number of memory accesses, a fixed length machine could store constants in unused bits of the instruction word itself, so that they would be immediately ready when the CPU needs them (much like immediate addressing in a conventional design). This required small opcodes in order to leave room for
6527-423: The definition of RISC deriving from the formulation of the term, along with the tendency to opportunistically categorize processor architectures with relatively few instructions (or groups of instructions) as RISC architectures, led to attempts to define RISC as a design philosophy. One attempt to do so was expressed as the following: A RISC processor has an instruction set that is designed for efficient execution by
SECTION 60
#17327840168216634-427: The design goal. They also considered the new 32-bit designs, but these cost even more and had the same issues with support chips. According to Sophie Wilson , all the processors tested at that time performed about the same, with about a 4 Mbit/s bandwidth. Two key events led Acorn down the path to ARM. One was the publication of a series of reports from the University of California, Berkeley , which suggested that
6741-537: The earlier 8-bit designs simply could not compete. Even newer 32-bit designs were also coming to market, such as the Motorola 68000 and National Semiconductor NS32016 . Acorn began considering how to compete in this market and produced a new paper design named the Acorn Business Computer . They set themselves the goal of producing a machine with ten times the performance of the BBC Micro, but at
6848-472: The early 1980s, leading, for example, to the iron law of processor performance . Since 2010, a new open standard instruction set architecture (ISA), Berkeley RISC-V , has been under development at the University of California, Berkeley, for research purposes and as a free alternative to proprietary ISAs. As of 2014, version 2 of the user space ISA is fixed. The ISA is designed to be extensible from
6955-643: The early 1980s. Few of these designs began by using RISC microprocessors . The varieties of RISC processor design include the ARC processor, the DEC Alpha, the AMD Am29000 , the ARM architecture, the Atmel AVR , Blackfin , Intel i860 , Intel i960 , LoongArch , Motorola 88000 , the MIPS architecture, PA-RISC, Power ISA, RISC-V , SuperH , and SPARC. RISC processors are used in supercomputers , such as
7062-449: The era ran at about 2 MHz; Acorn arranged a deal with Hitachi for a supply of faster 4 MHz parts. Machines of the era generally shared memory between the processor and the framebuffer , which allowed the processor to quickly update the contents of the screen without having to perform separate input/output (I/O). As the timing of the video display is exacting, the video hardware had to have priority access to that memory. Due to
7169-591: The first such computers, using the Apple M1 processor, were released in November 2020. Macs with Apple silicon can run x86-64 binaries with Rosetta 2 , an x86-64 to ARM64 translator. Outside of the desktop arena, however, the ARM RISC architecture is in widespread use in smartphones, tablets and many forms of embedded devices. While early RISC designs differed significantly from contemporary CISC designs, by 2000
7276-509: The highest-performing CPUs in the RISC line were almost indistinguishable from the highest-performing CPUs in the CISC line. RISC architectures are now used across a range of platforms, from smartphones and tablet computers to some of the world's fastest supercomputers such as Fugaku , the fastest on the TOP500 list as of November 2020 , and Summit , Sierra , and Sunway TaihuLight ,
7383-413: The immediate value 1. The original RISC-I format remains a canonical example of the concept. It uses 7 bits for the opcode and a 1-bit flag for conditional codes, the following 5 bits for the destination register, and the next five for the first operand. This leaves 14 bits, the first of which indicates whether the following 13 contain an immediate value or uses only five of them to indicate a register for
7490-403: The instruction encoding. This leaves ample room to indicate both the opcode and one or two registers. Register-to-register operations, mostly math and logic, require enough bits to encode the two or three registers being used. Most processors use the three-operand format, of the form A = B + C , in which case three registers numbers are needed. If the processor has 32 registers, each one requires
7597-590: The instruction set, writing a simulation of the processor in BBC ;BASIC that ran on a BBC Micro with a second 6502 processor . This convinced Acorn engineers they were on the right track. Wilson approached Acorn's CEO, Hermann Hauser , and requested more resources. Hauser gave his approval and assembled a small team to design the actual processor based on Wilson's ISA. The official Acorn RISC Machine project started in October 1983. Acorn chose VLSI Technology as
7704-445: The instruction word which could then be used to select among a larger set of registers. The telephone switch program was canceled in 1975, but by then the team had demonstrated that the same design would offer significant performance gains running just about any code. In simulations, they showed that a compiler tuned to use registers wherever possible would run code about three times as fast as traditional designs. Somewhat surprisingly,
7811-471: The lack of microcode , which represents about one-quarter to one-third of the 68000's transistors, and the lack of (like most CPUs of the day) a cache . This simplicity enabled the ARM2 to have a low power consumption and simpler thermal packaging by having fewer powered transistors. Nevertheless, ARM2 offered better performance than the contemporary 1987 IBM PS/2 Model 50 , which initially utilised an Intel 80286 , offering 1.8 MIPS @ 10 MHz, and later in 1987,
7918-428: The large variety of instructions in the 68k. Patterson's early work pointed out an important problem with the traditional "more is better" approach; even those instructions that were critical to overall performance were being delayed by their trip through the microcode. If the microcode was removed, the programs would run faster. And since the microcode ultimately took a complex instruction and broke it into steps, there
8025-610: The late 1970s, but these were not immediately put into use. Designers in California picked up the 801 concepts in two seminal projects, Stanford MIPS and Berkeley RISC . These were commercialized in the 1980s as the MIPS and SPARC systems. IBM eventually produced RISC designs based on further work on the 801 concept, the IBM POWER architecture , PowerPC , and Power ISA . As the projects matured, many similar designs, produced in
8132-482: The late 1970s, the 801 had become well-known in the industry. This coincided with new fabrication techniques that were allowing more complex chips to come to market. The Zilog Z80 of 1976 had 8,000 transistors, whereas the 1979 Motorola 68000 (68k) had 68,000. These newer designs generally used their newfound complexity to expand the instruction set to make it more orthogonal. Most, like the 68k, used microcode to do this, reading instructions and re-implementing them as
8239-421: The lower 2 bits of an instruction address were always zero. This meant the program counter (PC) only needed to be 24 bits, allowing it to be stored along with the eight bit processor flags in a single 32-bit register. That meant that upon receiving an interrupt, the entire machine state could be saved in a single operation, whereas had the PC been a full 32-bit value, it would require separate operations to store
8346-494: The main goals of the RISC approach. Some of this is possible only due to the contemporary move to 32-bit formats. For instance, in a typical program, over 30% of all the numeric constants are either 0 or 1, 95% will fit in one byte, and 99% in a 16-bit value. When computers were based on 8- or 16-bit words, it would be difficult to have an immediate combined with the opcode in a single memory word, although certain instructions like increment and decrement did this implicitly by using
8453-422: The majority of mathematical instructions were simple assignments; only 1 ⁄ 3 of them actually performed an operation like addition or subtraction. But when those operations did occur, they tended to be slow. This led to far more emphasis on the underlying arithmetic data unit, as opposed to previous designs where the majority of the chip was dedicated to control and microcode. The resulting Berkeley RISC
8560-492: The market. 1981 was also the year that the IBM Personal Computer was introduced. Using the recently introduced Intel 8088 , a 16-bit CPU compared to the 6502's 8-bit design, it offered higher overall performance. Its introduction changed the desktop computer market radically: what had been largely a hobby and gaming market emerging over the prior five years began to change to a must-have business tool where
8667-558: The mid-1980s. The Acorn ARM1 appeared in April 1985, MIPS R2000 appeared in January 1986, followed shortly thereafter by Hewlett-Packard 's PA-RISC in some of their computers. In the meantime, the Berkeley effort had become so well known that it eventually became the name for the entire concept. In 1987 Sun Microsystems began shipping systems with the SPARC processor, directly based on
8774-514: The mid-to-late 1980s and early 1990s, such as ARM , PA-RISC , and Alpha , created central processing units that increased the commercial utility of the Unix workstation and of embedded processors in the laser printer , the router , and similar products. In the minicomputer market, companies that included Celerity Computing , Pyramid Technology , and Ridge Computers began offering systems designed according to RISC or RISC-like principles in
8881-563: The most significant characteristics of RISC processors was that external memory was only accessible by a load or store instruction. All other instructions were limited to internal registers. This simplified many aspects of processor design: allowing instructions to be fixed-length, simplifying pipelines, and isolating the logic for dealing with the delay in completing a memory access (cache miss, etc.) to only two instructions. This led to RISC designs being referred to as load–store architectures. Some CPUs have been specifically designed to have
8988-591: The most widely adopted RISC ISA, initially intended to deliver higher-performance desktop computing, at low cost, and in a restricted thermal package, such as in the Acorn Archimedes , while featuring in the Super Computer League tables , its initial, relatively, lower power and cooling implementation was soon adapted to embedded applications, such as laser printer raster image processing. Acorn, in partnership with Apple Inc, and VLSI, creating ARM Ltd, in 1990, to share R&D costs and find new markets for
9095-540: The opcode was 0 and the last 6 bits contained the actual code; those that used an immediate value used the normal opcode field at the front. One drawback of 32-bit instructions is reduced code density, which is more adverse a characteristic in embedded computing than it is in the workstation and server markets RISC architectures were originally designed to serve. To address this problem, several architectures, such as SuperH (1992), ARM thumb (1994), MIPS16e (2004), Power Variable Length Encoding ISA (2006), RISC-V , and
9202-531: The opposite direction, having added longer 32-bit instructions to an original 16-bit encoding. The most characteristic aspect of RISC is executing at least one instruction per cycle . Single-cycle operation is described as "the rapid execution of simple functions that dominate a computer's instruction stream", thus seeking to deliver an average throughput approaching one instruction per cycle for any single instruction stream. Other features of RISC architectures include: RISC designs are also more likely to feature
9309-497: The required additional memory accesses. It was argued that such functions would be better performed by sequences of simpler instructions if this could yield implementations small enough to leave room for many registers, reducing the number of slow memory accesses. In these simple designs, most instructions are of uniform length and similar structure, arithmetic operations are restricted to CPU registers and only separate load and store instructions access memory. These properties enable
9416-402: The resulting machine being called a "reduced instruction set computer" (RISC). The goal was to make instructions so simple that they could easily be pipelined, in order to achieve a single clock throughput at high frequencies . This contrasted with CISC designs whose "crucial arithmetic operations and register transfers" were considered difficult to pipeline. Later, it was noted that one of
9523-508: The same code would run about 50% faster even on existing machines due to the improved register use. In practice, their experimental PL/8 compiler, a slightly cut-down version of PL/I , consistently produced code that ran much faster on their existing mainframes. A 32-bit version of the 801 was eventually produced in a single-chip form as the IBM ROMP in 1981, which stood for 'Research OPD [Office Products Division] Micro Processor'. This CPU
9630-498: The same price. This would outperform and underprice the PC. At the same time, the recent introduction of the Apple Lisa brought the graphical user interface (GUI) concept to a wider audience and suggested the future belonged to machines with a GUI. The Lisa, however, cost $ 9,995, as it was packed with support chips, large amounts of memory, and a hard disk drive , all very expensive then. The engineers then began studying all of
9737-475: The second half of the 1980s, and led the designers of the MIPS-X to put it this way in 1987: The goal of any instruction format should be: 1. simple decode, 2. simple decode, and 3. simple decode. Any attempts at improved code density at the expense of CPU performance should be ridiculed at every opportunity. Competition between RISC and conventional CISC approaches was also the subject of theoretical analysis in
9844-408: The second operand. A more complex example is the MIPS encoding, which used only 6 bits for the opcode, followed by two 5-bit registers. The remaining 16 bits could be used in two ways, one as a 16-bit immediate value, or as a 5-bit shift value (used only in shift operations, otherwise zero) and the remaining 6 bits as an extension on the opcode. In the case of register-to-register arithmetic operations,
9951-458: The simpler design, compared with processors like the Intel 80286 and Motorola 68020 , some additional design features were used: ARM includes integer arithmetic operations for add, subtract, and multiply; some versions of the architecture also support divide operations. Reduced instruction set computer In electronics and computer science , a reduced instruction set computer ( RISC )
10058-424: The speed of each instruction, in particular by implementing an instruction pipeline , which may be simpler to achieve given simpler instructions. The key operational concept of the RISC computer is that each instruction performs only one function (e.g. copy a value from memory to a register). The RISC computer usually has many (16 or 32) high-speed, general-purpose registers with a load–store architecture in which
10165-514: The support chips (VIDC, IOC, MEMC), and sped up the CAD software used in ARM2 development. Wilson subsequently rewrote BBC BASIC in ARM assembly language . The in-depth knowledge gained from designing the instruction set enabled the code to be very dense, making ARM BBC BASIC an extremely good test for any ARM emulator. The result of the simulations on the ARM1 boards led to the late 1986 introduction of
10272-536: The synthesizable RTL, the customer has the ability to perform architectural level optimisations and extensions. This allows the designer to achieve exotic design goals not otherwise possible with an unmodified netlist ( high clock speed , very low power consumption, instruction set extensions, etc.). While Arm Holdings does not grant the licensee the right to resell the ARM architecture itself, licensees may freely sell manufactured products such as chip devices, evaluation boards and complete systems. Merchant foundries can be
10379-459: The use of memory; a single instruction from a traditional processor like the Motorola 68k may be written out as perhaps a half dozen of the simpler RISC instructions. In theory, this could slow the system down as it spent more time fetching instructions from memory. But by the mid-1980s, the concepts had matured enough to be seen as commercially viable. Commercial RISC designs began to emerge in
10486-514: The use of the pipeline, making sure it could be run as "full" as possible. The MIPS system was followed by the MIPS-X and in 1984 Hennessy and his colleagues formed MIPS Computer Systems to produce the design commercially. The venture resulted in a new architecture that was also called MIPS and the R2000 microprocessor in 1985. The overall philosophy of the RISC concept was widely understood by
10593-441: The vast majority of the available instructions, especially orthogonal addressing modes. Instead, they selected the fastest version of any given instruction and then constructed small routines using it. This suggested that the majority of instructions could be removed without affecting the resulting code. These two conclusions worked in concert; removing instructions would allow the instruction opcodes to be shorter, freeing up bits in
10700-495: The window "down" by eight, to the set of eight registers used by that procedure, and the return moves the window back. The Berkeley RISC project delivered the RISC-I processor in 1982. Consisting of only 44,420 transistors (compared with averages of about 100,000 in newer CISC designs of the era), RISC-I had only 32 instructions, and yet completely outperformed any other single-chip design, with estimated performance being higher than
10807-440: The world's fastest supercomputer from 2020 to 2022. With over 230 billion ARM chips produced, since at least 2003, and with its dominance increasing every year, ARM is the most widely used family of instruction set architectures. There have been several generations of the ARM design. The original ARM1 used a 32-bit internal structure but had a 26-bit address space that limited it to 64 MB of main memory . This limitation
10914-512: Was a dramatically simplified design, offering performance on par with expensive workstations but at a price point similar to contemporary desktops. The ARM2 featured a 32-bit data bus , 26-bit address space and 27 32-bit registers , of which 16 are accessible at any one time (including the PC ). The ARM2 had a transistor count of just 30,000, compared to Motorola's six-year-older 68000 model with around 68,000. Much of this simplicity came from
11021-498: Was based on gaining performance through the use of pipelining and aggressive use of register windowing. In a traditional CPU, one has a small number of registers, and a program can use any register at any time. In a CPU with register windows, there are a huge number of registers, e.g., 128, but programs can only use a small number of them, e.g., eight, at any one time. A program that limits itself to eight registers per procedure can make very fast procedure calls : The call simply moves
11128-468: Was designed for "mini" tasks, and found use in peripheral interfaces and channel controllers on later IBM computers. It was also used as the CPU in the IBM RT PC in 1986, which turned out to be a commercial failure. Although the 801 did not see widespread use in its original form, it inspired many research projects, including ones at IBM that would eventually lead to the IBM POWER architecture . By
11235-474: Was no reason the compiler couldn't do this instead. These studies suggested that, even with no other changes, one could make a chip with 1 ⁄ 3 fewer transistors that would run faster. In the original RISC-I paper they noted: Skipping this extra level of interpretation appears to enhance performance while reducing chip size. It was also discovered that, on microcoded implementations of certain architectures, complex operations tended to be slower than
11342-678: Was removed in the ARMv3 series, which has a 32-bit address space, and several additional generations up to ARMv7 remained 32-bit. Released in 2011, the ARMv8-A architecture added support for a 64-bit address space and 64-bit arithmetic with its new 32-bit fixed-length instruction set. Arm Holdings has also released a series of additional instruction sets for different rules; the "Thumb" extension adds both 32- and 16-bit instructions for improved code density , while Jazelle added instructions for directly handling Java bytecode . More recent changes include
11449-570: Was the most widely used architecture in mobile devices as of 2011. Since 1995, various versions of the ARM Architecture Reference Manual (see § External links ) have been the primary source of documentation on the ARM processor architecture and instruction set, distinguishing interfaces that all ARM processors are required to support (such as instruction semantics) from implementation details that may vary. The architecture has evolved over time, and version seven of
#820179