In most classifications, the Eastern Sudanic languages are a group of nine families of languages that may constitute a branch of the Nilo-Saharan language family . Eastern Sudanic languages are spoken from southern Egypt to northern Tanzania .
26-414: Nubian (and possibly Meroitic ) gives Eastern Sudanic some of the earliest written attestations of African languages. However, the largest branch by far is Nilotic , spread by extensive and comparatively recent conquests throughout East Africa . Before the spread of Nilotic, Eastern Sudanic was centered in present-day Sudan . The name "East Sudanic" refers to the eastern part of the region of Sudan where
52-415: A Surmic–Nilotic relationship. There are several different classifications of East Sudanic languages. Lionel Bender assigns the languages into two branches, depending on whether the 1sg pronoun ("I") has a /k/ or an /n/: Nubian Nara Nyima Taman Surmic Eastern Jebel Temein (Nuba Hills) Daju Nilotic Claude Rilly (2009:2) provides the following internal structure for
78-406: A derogatory term used by neighboring Nilotic-speaking peoples to disparage Kuliak speakers as "poor," hence his preference for using Rub instead. However, Kuliak continues to be the most widely used name, and is preferred by Roger Blench , Terrill Schrock, Sam Beer and other linguists, who note that the name "Kuliak" is not perceived as offensive or pejorative by any Kuliak speakers. According to
104-501: A few roots, e.g. Old Nubian has several sets of pronouns and subject clitics are the following, of which the following are the main ones: There are two demonstrative pronouns : Interrogative words include ⳟⲁⲉⲓ "who?"; ⲙⲛ̄ "what?"; and a series of question words based on the root ⲥ̄ . The Old Nubian verbal system is by far the most complex part of its grammar, allowing for valency , tense , mood , aspect , person and pluractionality to be expressed on it through
130-600: A member of Afroasiatic was made by Archibald Tucker in the 1960s; this was criticized as weak and abandoned by the 1980s. The following sound correspondences are identified by Bernd Heine (1976), who proposes also corresponding Proto-Kuliak reconstructions. For other vowel correspondences, Heine reconstructs clusters of vowels: Heine reconstructs two classes of stress in Proto-Kuliak: "primary", which could occur in any position and remains in place in all Kuliak languages, and "secondary", which always occurred on
156-444: A supralinear stroke, which could indicate: Modern Nobiin is a tonal language; if Old Nubian was tonal as well, the tones were not marked. Punctuation marks included a high dot •, sometimes substituted by a double backslash \\ ( ⳹ ), which was used roughly like an English period or colon ; a slash / ( ⳺ ), which was used like a question mark ; and a double slash // ( ⳼ ), which was sometimes used to separate verses. In 2021,
182-450: A use as determiner. Old Nubian has a nominative-accusative case system with four structural cases determining the core arguments in the sentence, as well as a number of lexical cases for adverbial phrases . The most common plural marker is -ⲅⲟⲩ , which always precedes case marking. There are a few irregular plurals, such as: Furthermore, there are traces of separate animate plural forms in -ⲣⲓ , which are textually limited to
208-440: A variety of suffixes. The main distinction between nominal and verbal predicates in a main clause versus a subordinate clause is indicated by the presence of the predicate marker -ⲁ . The major categories, listing from the root of the verb to the right, are as follows: This can be indicated by a series of subject clitics, which are obligatory only in certain grammatical contexts. They are generally absent when an overt subject
234-451: Is an extinct Nubian language, attested in writing from the 8th to the 15th century AD. It is ancestral to modern-day Nobiin and closely related to Dongolawi and Kenzi . It was used throughout the kingdom of Makuria , including the eparchy of Nobatia . The language is preserved in more than a hundred pages of documents and inscriptions , both of a religious nature (homilies, prayers, hagiographies, psalms, lectionaries), and related to
260-659: Is beyond reasonable doubt. Nubian Nara Taman ? Nyima ? Surmic ? Jebel ? Temein ? Daju ? Nilotic Nyima is not part of the northern group, though it appears to be closest to it. (For one thing, its pronouns align well with the northern (Astaboran) branches.) Surmic, Nilotic, and Temein share a number of similarities, including in their pronouns, but not enough to warrant classifying them together in opposition to Astaboran without proper comparative work. Jebel and Daju also share many similarities with Surma and Nilotic, though their pronominal systems are closer to Astaboran. Inclusion of Kuliak and Berta
286-713: Is not supported. Similarities with Kuliak may be due to both being Nilo-Saharan families, whereas Berta and Jebel form a sprachbund . A similar classification was given in Starostin (2014): Roger Blench (2019) and (2021), like Starostin, only finds support for Bender's Northern branch. Blench proposes the following internal structure, supported by morphological evidence. Nilotic Surmic Eastern Jebel Daju Temein Nubian Nara Taman Ama Old Nubian language Old Nubian (also called Middle Nubian or Old Nobiin )
SECTION 10
#1732764654043312-622: Is present in the clause, unless the subject has the topic marker -ⲉⲓⲟⲛ. ⲕⲧ̅ⲕⲁ kit-ka stone- ACC ⲅⲉⲗⲅⲉⲗⲟ̅ⲥⲟⲩⲁⲛⲛⲟⲛ gelgel-os-ou-an-non roll- PFV - PST1 - 3PL - TOP ⲓ̈ⲏ̅ⲥⲟⲩⲥⲓ iēsousi Jesus ⲙⲁⳡⲁⲛ mañan eye. DU ⲧⲣⲓⲕⲁ· tri-ka both- ACC ⲇⲟⲗⲗⲉ dolle high ⲡⲟⲗⲅⲁⲣⲁ polgar-a raise. CAUS - PRED [ⲡⲉⲥⲥⲛⲁ·] pes-s-n-a speak- PST2 - 2 / 3 / SG - PRED ⲡⲁⲡⲟ pap-o father- VOC ⲥ̅ⲕⲉⲗⲙ̅ⲙⲉ iskel-im-m-e thank- AFF - PRS - 1SG . PRED ⲉⲕ̅[ⲕⲁ] Kuliak languages The Kuliak languages , also called
338-515: Is the largest constituent of modern Eastern Sudanic. Güldemann (2018) considers East Sudanic to be undemonstrated at the current state of research. He only accepts the evidence for a connection between the Nilotic and Surmic languages as "robust", while he states that Rilly's evidence (see below) for the northern group comprising Nubian , Nara , Nyima , Taman and Meroitic "certainly look[s] promising". Glottolog (2023) does not accept even
364-658: The Rub languages , are a group of languages spoken by small relict communities in the mountainous Karamoja region of northeastern Uganda . Nyang'i and Soo are moribund , with a handful of elderly speakers. However, Ik is vigorous and growing. Word order in Kuliak languages is verb-initial. The Kuliak languages are also called the Rub languages by Ehret (1981), since Ehret reconstructed "Rub" to mean 'person' in Proto-Kuliak. He suggests that "Kuliak" may actually be
390-668: The White Monastery in Sohag . The alphabet included three additional letters ⳡ /ɲ/ and ⳣ /w/ , and ⳟ /ŋ/ , the first two deriving from the Meroitic alphabet . The presence of these characters suggest that although the first written evidence of Old Nubian dates to the 8th century, the script must have already been developed in the 6th century, following the collapse of the Meroitic state. Additionally, Old Nubian used
416-467: The 10th–11th century as the main language for the civil and religious administration of Makuria. Besides Old Nubian, Koine Greek was widely used, especially in religious contexts, while Coptic mainly predominates in funerary inscriptions. Over time, more and more Old Nubian began to appear in both secular and religious documents ( including the Bible ), while several grammatical aspects of Greek, including
442-654: The 2nd syllable of a word, and remains there in Ik and Nyang'i, but shifts to the first syllable in Tepes. Blench notes that Kuliak languages do not have extensive internal diversity and clearly had a relatively recent common ancestor. There are many monosyllabic VC (vowel + consonant) lexical roots in Kuliak languages, which is typologically unusual among Nilo-Saharan languages and is more typical of some Australian languages such as Kunjen . Blench considers these VC roots to have cognates in other Nilo-Saharan languages, and suggests that
468-595: The Eastern Sudanic languages. Nyima Taman Nara Meroitic Nubian Nilotic Surmic Jebel Temein Daju Starostin, using lexicostatistics , finds strong support for Bender's Northern branch, but none for the Southern branch. Eastern Sudanic as a whole is rated a probable working model, pending proper comparative work, while the relationship between Nubian, Tama, and Nara
494-488: The case, agreement, gender, and tense morphology underwent significant erosion. The consecration documents found with the remains of archbishop Timotheos suggest, however, that Greek and Coptic continued to be used into the late 14th century, by which time Arabic was also in widespread use. The script in which nearly all Old Nubian texts have been written is a slanted uncial variant of the Coptic alphabet , originating from
520-405: The classification of Heine (1976), Soo and Nyang'i form a subgroup, Western Kuliak, while Ik stands by itself. Soo (Tepes, Kadam) – 50 speakers, moribund Nyang'i (Nyangia) – 1 speaker, nearly extinct Ik (Teuso) – 7,500 speakers, vigorous According to Schrock (2015), " Dorobo " is a spurious language , is not a fourth Kuliak language, and may at most be a dialect of Ik. Heine finds
546-550: The country of Sudan is located, and contrasts with Central Sudanic and Western Sudanic (modern Mande , in the Niger–Congo family ). Lionel Bender (1980) proposes several Eastern Sudanic isoglosses (defining words), such as *kutuk "mouth", *(ko)TVS-(Vg) "three", and *ku-lug-ut or *kVl(t) "fish". In older classifications, such as that of Meinhof (1911), the term was used for the eastern Sudanic languages , largely equivalent to modern Nilo-Saharan sans Nilotic , which
SECTION 20
#1732764654043572-399: The entire noun phrase , which may also comprise adjectives , possessors , and relative clauses . Old Nubian has one definite determiner -(ⲓ)ⲗ . The precise function of this morpheme has been a matter of controversy, with some scholars proposing it as nominative case or subjective marker. Both the distribution of the morpheme and comparative evidence from Meroitic, however, point to
598-401: The first modern Nubian typeface based on the style of text written in old Nubian manuscripts called Sawarda was released designed by Hatim-Arbaab Eujayl for a series of educational books teaching Nobiin. Old Nubian has no gender . The noun consists of a stem to which derivational suffixes may be added. Plural markers, case markers, postpositions , and the determiner are added on
624-503: The following numbers of correspondences between the languages on the 200-word Swadesh list : Bender (1989) had classified the Kuliak languages within the Eastern Sudanic languages . Later, Bender (2000) revised this position by placing Kuliak as basal branch of Nilo-Saharan . Glottolog treats Kuliak as an independent language family and does not accept Nilo-Saharan as a valid language family. An early suggestion for Ik as
650-480: The state and private life (legal documents, letters), written using adaptation of the Coptic alphabet . Old Nubian, according to historical linguists, was the spoken language of the oldest inhabitants of the Nile valley. Adams, Berhens, Griffith and Bechhause-Gerst agree that Nile Nubian has its origins in the Nile valley. Old Nubian is one of the oldest written African languages and appears to have been adopted from
676-529: The variant ⳝ for the Coptic letter ϭ . The characters ⲍ, ⲝ/ϩ ⲭ, ⲯ only appear in Greek loanwords. Gemination was indicated by writing double consonants; long vowels were usually not distinguished from short ones. Old Nubian featured two digraphs : ⲟⲩ /u, uː/ and ⲉⲓ /i, iː/ . A diaeresis over ⲓ ( ⲓ̈ ) was used to indicate the semivowel /j/ . In addition, Old Nubian featured
#42957