Misplaced Pages

Idra

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Jewish Babylonian Aramaic ( Aramaic : ארמית Ārāmît ) was the form of Middle Aramaic employed by writers in Lower Mesopotamia between the fourth and eleventh centuries. It is most commonly identified with the language of the Babylonian Talmud (which was completed in the seventh century), the Targum Onqelos , and of post-Talmudic ( Gaonic ) literature, which are the most important cultural products of Babylonian Jews . The most important epigraphic sources for the dialect are the hundreds of inscriptions on incantation bowls .

#838161

26-588: The Idra ( Jewish Babylonian Aramaic : אִדְרָא , romanized:  iḏrā , lit.   ' threshing floor '), is a Kabbalistic work included in printings of the Zohar , and was probably written and appended to the main body of the Zohar at a later date. Contemporary scholars believe the Idra dates to the third generation of Zoharic literature, which also produced the two anonymous or collective works of

52-406: A change in the root of the word ( vowel alternation , change of the last root consonant) and stress shift. An interesting example is with the word брать (to take); an archaic usage recorded among hunters , normally used in the past tense, in hunter's boasting: бирал, бирывал meaning "used to take (quite a few) trophies". The simplest way to produce a frequentative is reduplication , either of

78-517: A different function for prefixed perfective verbs : it serves to create their imperfective equivalents. For instance, rozczytywać (to try to read something barely legible) is simply an imperfective equivalent of rozczytać (to succeed at reading something barely legible). In the Russian language , the frequentative form of verbs to denote a repeated or customary action is produced by inserting suffixes -ива-/-ыва-, -ва- or -а́-, often accompanied with

104-441: A frequentative compared to the base can be different depending on the base: The –gat affix can modify the occurrences or the intensity or both of an action. Occasionally it produces a specific meaning which is related but distinct from the original form's. Examples: In Latin , frequentative verbs indicate repeated or intense action. They are usually formed from the supine stem with -āre added. The following, exceptionally,

130-403: A front vowel; see vowel harmony ). Also there is a so-called Template rule, which forces another vowel in between the base verb and the affix resulting in a word containing at least three syllables. Verbal prefixes (coverbs) do not count as a syllable. Some verbs' frequentative forms have acquired an independent non-frequentative meaning. In these cases the three syllables rule is not applied as

156-399: A monosyllable (e.g., coo-cooing , cf. Latin murmur ). Frequentative nouns are often formed by combining two different vowel grades of the same word (as in teeter-totter , pitter-patter , chitchat .) In Finnish , a frequentative verb signifies a single action repeated, "around the place" both spatially and temporally. The complete translation would be "go — around aimlessly". There

182-544: A separate but not completely independent word called a frequentative . The frequentative is no longer productive in English, unlike in some language groups, such as Finno-Ugric , Balto-Slavic , and Turkic . English has -le and - er as frequentative suffixes . Some frequentative verbs surviving in English , and their parent verbs are listed below. Additionally, some frequentative verbs are formed by reduplication of

208-513: A single action repeated in the past. Starting from the infinitive without –ti , it is formed by adding the invariant morpheme –dav– followed by the regular past tense suffix of the first conjugation. For instance, dirb· ti ("to work", a first-conjugation verb), whose plain past tense is dirb· au ("I worked" or "I have worked"), has a past iterative of dirb· dav · au ("I used to work"). The six intersections of person and number map onto five distinct frequentative endings; there

234-543: A specialist language of study and legal argumentation, like Law French , rather than a vernacular mother tongue, and continued in use for these purposes long after Judeo-Arabic had become the languages of daily life. It has developed a battery of technical logical terms, such as tiyuvta (conclusive refutation) and tiqu (undecidable moot point), which are still used in Jewish legal writings, including those in other languages, and have influenced modern Hebrew . Like

260-443: Is Active Frequentative . The verbal pattern itpa'al is Passive Frequentative . The verbal pattern aphel is Active Causative . The verbal pattern itaphal is Passive Causative . The language has received considerable scholarly attention, as shown in the bibliography below. However, the majority of those who are familiar with it, namely Orthodox Jewish students of Talmud, are given no systematic instruction in

286-419: Is 3rd conjugation: Occasionally, however, they are formed not from the supine but from the present stem with -itāre . The following is irregular since the supine of nāre is nātum with a long ā: A frequentative verb can be made doubly frequentative by adding - itāre to a supine: Some frequentative verbs have no simple form: Lithuanian has a past frequentative (or iterative), which serves to express

SECTION 10

#1732798178839

312-498: Is a large array of different frequentatives, indicated by lexical agglutinative markers. In general, one frequentative is -:i- , and another -ele- , but it is almost always combined with something else. Some forms: There are several frequentative morphemes, underlined above; these are affected by consonant gradation as indicated. Their meanings are slightly different; see the list, arranged infinitive ~ personal : Frequentatives may be combined with momentanes , that is, to indicate

338-588: Is no morphological distinction of number in the third person, nor of conjugation class in general. The closest relative of Lithuanian, Latvian , as well as the Samogitian dialect of the language, has no separate past tense to mark iterative aspect; in its place, however, both may express it by means of periphrasis . An auxiliary verb – mēgt in Latvian and liuobėti in Samogitian – will then occupy

364-435: Is such. If the action can be nothing else but frequentative, the "basic form" doesn't even exist, such as with "to go shopping". Adjectives can similarly receive frequentative markers: iso — isotella "big — to talk big", or feikkailla < English fake "to be fake, blatantly and consistently". In Homer and Herodotus , there is a past frequentative, usually called "past iterative", with an additional -sk- suffix before

390-641: The Tikunei haZohar and Ra'aya Mehemna "Faithful Shephard" as well as other Zoharic material. The main body of the Zohar dates to the second generation of Zoharic material. There are two texts in Zoharic literature called the Idra . The first is the Idra Rabba "greater Idra", and the second is the Idra Zuta "lesser Idra." These two texts are intimately connected. In the standard printed edition of

416-634: The Yemenite Jews , and where available those of the Iraqi , Syrian and Egyptian Jews . The value of the Yemenite reading tradition has been challenged by Matthew Morgenstern . (The vocalized Aramaic texts with which Jews are familiar, from the Bible and the prayer book , are of limited usefulness for this purpose, as they are in different dialects.) Talmudic Aramaic bears all the marks of being

442-565: The Zohar , the Idra Rabba is printed in the section relating to the parasha of Naso , and the Idra Zuta is printed in Haazinu . 16th century Lurianic Kabbalah systemised the Zoharic partzufim in its recasting of the whole Kabbalistic scheme. On one occasion, as recorded by Hayyim ben Joseph Vital , Isaac Luria convened his students in the traditional location of the Idra Rabba Assembly near Meron , placing each one in

468-409: The designated location of their former incarnations as the students of bar Yohai. In so doing, he identified himself with bar Yohai. Jewish Babylonian Aramaic language The language was closely related to other Eastern Aramaic dialects such as Mandaic . Its original pronunciation is uncertain, and has to be reconstructed with the help of these kindred dialects and of the reading tradition of

494-407: The endings. The same suffix is used in inchoative verbs in both Ancient Greek and Latin . The infix may occur in the forms -σκ-, -ασκ-, and -εσκ-. Homer regularly omits the augment. The iterative occurs most often in the imperfect, but also in the aorist. In Hungarian it is quite common and everyday to use frequentative. Frequentative verbs are formed with the suffix –gat ( –get after

520-498: The form Pa'el (פַּעֵל) “like to do”, are all in the active voice. But the form Itpe'el (אִתְפְּעֵל), the form Itaph'al (אִתַפְעַל) and the form Itpa'al (אִתְפַּעַל) are essentially reflexive and usually function in a passive sense. The Aramaic verb has two participles : an active participle with suffix and a passive participle with suffix : |} The verbal pattern (binyan) pa‘el are frequentative verbs showing repeated or intense action. The verbal pattern pa'el

546-461: The form is not considered a frequentative. These words can be affixed with –gat again to create a frequentative meaning. In rare cases non-verbs can be affixed by –gat to give them similar modification in meaning as to verbs. In most cases these non-verbs are obviously related to some actions, like a typical outcome or object. The resulting word basically has the same meaning as if the related verb were affixed with –gat . The change in meaning of

SECTION 20

#1732798178839

572-405: The ground shakes once ( maa tärähtää ) when a cannon fires, and the ground shakes suddenly but repeatedly ( maa tärähtelee ) when a battery of cannons is firing. Since the frequentative is a lexical, not a grammatical contrast, considerable semantic drift may have occurred. For a list of different real and hypothetical forms, see: Loanwords are put into the frequentative form, if the action

598-420: The language, and are expected to "sink or swim" in the course of their Talmudic studies, with the help of some informal pointers showing similarities and differences with Hebrew. Frequentative In grammar , a frequentative form ( abbreviated FREQ or FR ) of a word is one that indicates repeated action but is not to be confused with iterative aspect . The frequentative form can be considered

624-551: The other Judeo-Aramaic languages , it was written in the Hebrew alphabet . May his great name shall be blessed (Kaddish Shalem, 8th century) ַ ני ‎ נַטְרַנִי ‎ he supervised me נֵיעָרְבִינְהוּ וְנִכְתְּבִינְהוּ There are six major verb stems or verbal patterns (binyanim) in Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. The form pe‘al (פְּעַל) “to do”, the form Aph'el (אַפְעֵל) “let do”, and

650-421: The repetition of a short, sudden action. The momentane -ahta- can be prefixed with the frequentative -ele- to produce the morpheme -ahtele- , as in täristä "to shake (continuously)" → tärähtää "to shake suddenly once" → tärähdellä "to shake, such that a single, sudden shaking is repeated". For example, the contrast between these is that ground shakes ( maa tärisee ) continuously when a large truck goes by,

676-461: The syntactic centre of the verb phrase (subject to conjugation), relegating the main verb to trail it as an (invariant) infinitive complement. Consider the following three translations of the English sentence "We used to read a lot." In the Polish language , certain imperfective verbs ending in -ać denote repeated or habitual action. The interfix -yw- used to form many frequentative verbs has

#838161