Misplaced Pages

#956043

37-653: [REDACTED] Look up Moravec in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Moravec may refer to: Places in the Czech Republic [ edit ] Moravec (Žďár nad Sázavou District) , a municipality and village in the Vysočina Region Moraveč , a municipality and village in the Vysočina Region Moraveč, a village and part of Chotoviny in

74-423: A Taylor expansion . Let I x {\displaystyle I_{x}} and I y {\displaystyle I_{y}} be the partial derivatives of I {\displaystyle I} , such that This produces the approximation which can be written in matrix form: where A is the structure tensor , In words, we find the covariance of the partial derivative of

111-474: A local scale for smoothing prior to the computation of image derivatives , and (ii) an integration scale for accumulating the non-linear operations on derivative operators into an integrated image descriptor. With I {\displaystyle I} denoting the original image intensity, let L {\displaystyle L} denote the scale space representation of I {\displaystyle I} obtained by convolution with

148-436: A Gaussian kernel with local scale parameter t {\displaystyle t} : and let L x = ∂ x L {\displaystyle L_{x}=\partial _{x}L} and L y = ∂ y L {\displaystyle L_{y}=\partial _{y}L} denote the partial derivatives of L {\displaystyle L} . Moreover, introduce

185-453: A Gaussian window function g ( x , y , s ) {\displaystyle g(x,y,s)} with integration scale parameter s {\displaystyle s} . Then, the multi-scale second-moment matrix can be defined as Then, we can compute eigenvalues of μ {\displaystyle \mu } in a similar way as the eigenvalues of A {\displaystyle A} and define

222-435: A corner but it can also be, for example, an isolated point of local intensity maximum or minimum, line endings, or a point on a curve where the curvature is locally maximal. In practice, most so-called corner detection methods detect interest points in general, and in fact, the term "corner" and "interest point" are used more or less interchangeably through the literature. As a consequence, if only corners are to be detected it

259-604: A corner with subpixel accuracy. To achieve an approximate solution, the Förstner algorithm solves for the point closest to all the tangent lines of the corner in a given window and is a least-square solution. The algorithm relies on the fact that for an ideal corner, tangent lines cross at a single point. The equation of a tangent line T x ′ ( x ) {\displaystyle T_{\mathbf {x} '}(\mathbf {x} )} at pixel x ′ {\displaystyle \mathbf {x} '}

296-710: A municipality and village in the Vysočina Region Moraveč, a village and part of Chotoviny in the South Bohemian Region Moraveč, a village and part of Slapsko in the South Bohemian Region People [ edit ] Moravec (surname) , people with the surname Moravec Other [ edit ] Moravec (robot) , a class of robots in the novel Ilium Moravec corner detection algorithm Moravec's paradox See also [ edit ] All pages with titles containing Moravec Topics referred to by

333-510: A notion of ridge detection to capture the presence of elongated objects. Corner detectors are not usually very robust and often require large redundancies introduced to prevent the effect of individual errors from dominating the recognition task. One determination of the quality of a corner detector is its ability to detect the same corner in multiple similar images, under conditions of different lighting, translation, rotation and other transforms. A simple approach to corner detection in images

370-540: Is also sometimes referred to as the Kanade–Tomasi corner detector. The value of κ {\displaystyle \kappa } has to be determined empirically, and in the literature values in the range 0.04–0.15 have been reported as feasible. One can avoid setting the parameter κ {\displaystyle \kappa } by using Noble's corner measure M c ′ {\displaystyle M_{c}'} which amounts to

407-460: Is computationally expensive, since it requires the computation of a square root , and instead suggest the following function M c {\displaystyle M_{c}} , where κ {\displaystyle \kappa } is a tunable sensitivity parameter: Therefore, the algorithm does not have to actually compute the eigenvalue decomposition of the matrix A {\displaystyle A} and instead it

SECTION 10

#1732772390957

444-419: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Moravec [REDACTED] Look up Moravec in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Moravec may refer to: Places in the Czech Republic [ edit ] Moravec (Žďár nad Sázavou District) , a municipality and village in the Vysočina Region Moraveč ,

481-491: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Moravec corner detection algorithm A corner can be defined as the intersection of two edges. A corner can also be defined as a point for which there are two dominant and different edge directions in a local neighbourhood of the point. An interest point is a point in an image which has a well-defined position and can be robustly detected. This means that an interest point can be

518-585: Is given by: where ∇ I ( x ′ ) = [ I x I y ] ⊤ {\displaystyle \nabla I(\mathbf {x'} )={\begin{bmatrix}I_{\mathbf {x} }&I_{\mathbf {y} }\end{bmatrix}}^{\top }} is the gradient vector of the image I {\displaystyle I} at x ′ {\displaystyle \mathbf {x'} } . The point x 0 {\displaystyle \mathbf {x} _{0}} closest to all

555-662: Is necessary to do a local analysis of detected interest points to determine which of these are real corners. Examples of edge detection that can be used with post-processing to detect corners are the Kirsch operator and the Frei-Chen masking set. "Corner", "interest point" and "feature" are used interchangeably in literature, confusing the issue. Specifically, there are several blob detectors that can be referred to as "interest point operators", but which are sometimes erroneously referred to as "corner detectors". Moreover, there exists

592-412: Is often referred to as autocorrelation , since the term is used in the paper in which this detector is described. However, the mathematics in the paper clearly indicate that the sum of squared differences is used.) Without loss of generality, we will assume a grayscale 2-dimensional image is used. Let this image be given by I {\displaystyle I} . Consider taking an image patch over

629-455: Is sufficient to evaluate the determinant and trace of A {\displaystyle A} to find corners, or rather interest points in general. The Shi–Tomasi corner detector directly computes min ( λ 1 , λ 2 ) {\displaystyle \min(\lambda _{1},\lambda _{2})} because under certain assumptions, the corners are more stable for tracking. Note that this method

666-439: Is that it is not isotropic : if an edge is present that is not in the direction of the neighbours (horizontal, vertical, or diagonal), then the smallest SSD will be large and the edge will be incorrectly chosen as an interest point. Harris and Stephens improved upon Moravec's corner detector by considering the differential of the corner score with respect to direction directly, instead of using shifted patches. (This corner score

703-489: Is the structure tensor . For the equation to have a solution, A {\displaystyle A} must be invertible, which implies that A {\displaystyle A} must be full rank (rank 2). Thus, the solution only exists where an actual corner exists in the window N {\displaystyle N} . A methodology for performing automatic scale selection for this corner localization method has been presented by Lindeberg by minimizing

740-399: Is using correlation , but this gets very computationally expensive and suboptimal. An alternative approach used frequently is based on a method proposed by Harris and Stephens (below), which in turn is an improvement of a method by Moravec. This is one of the earliest corner detection algorithms and defines a corner to be a point with low self-similarity. The algorithm tests each pixel in

777-403: Is usually chosen in the interval [ 1 , 2 ] {\displaystyle [1,2]} . Thus, we can compute the multi-scale Harris corner measure M c ( x , y ; t , γ 2 t ) {\displaystyle M_{c}(x,y;t,\gamma ^{2}t)} at any scale t {\displaystyle t} in scale-space to obtain

SECTION 20

#1732772390957

814-406: The harmonic mean of the eigenvalues: ϵ {\displaystyle \epsilon } being a small positive constant. If A {\displaystyle A} can be interpreted as the precision matrix for the corner position, the covariance matrix for the corner position is A − 1 {\displaystyle A^{-1}} , i.e. The sum of

851-534: The multi-scale Harris corner measure as Concerning the choice of the local scale parameter t {\displaystyle t} and the integration scale parameter s {\displaystyle s} , these scale parameters are usually coupled by a relative integration scale parameter γ {\displaystyle \gamma } such that s = γ 2 t {\displaystyle s=\gamma ^{2}t} , where γ {\displaystyle \gamma }

888-505: The Harris operator, requires the computation of image derivatives I x , I y {\displaystyle I_{x},I_{y}} in the image domain as well as the summation of non-linear combinations of these derivatives over local neighbourhoods. Since the computation of derivatives usually involves a stage of scale-space smoothing, an operational definition of the Harris operator requires two scale parameters: (i)

925-445: The South Bohemian Region Moraveč, a village and part of Slapsko in the South Bohemian Region People [ edit ] Moravec (surname) , people with the surname Moravec Other [ edit ] Moravec (robot) , a class of robots in the novel Ilium Moravec corner detection algorithm Moravec's paradox See also [ edit ] All pages with titles containing Moravec Topics referred to by

962-436: The area ( u , v ) {\displaystyle (u,v)} and shifting it by ( x , y ) {\displaystyle (x,y)} . The weighted sum of squared differences (SSD) between these two patches, denoted S {\displaystyle S} , is given by: I ( u + x , v + y ) {\displaystyle I(u+x,v+y)} can be approximated by

999-410: The eigenvalues of A − 1 {\displaystyle A^{-1}} , which in that case can be interpreted as a generalized variance (or a "total uncertainty") of the corner position, is related to Noble's corner measure M c ′ {\displaystyle M_{c}'} by the following equation: In some cases, one may wish to compute the location of

1036-405: The eigenvalues of A {\displaystyle A} , this characterization can be expressed in the following way: A {\displaystyle A} should have two "large" eigenvalues for an interest point. Based on the magnitudes of the eigenvalues, the following inferences can be made based on this argument: Harris and Stephens note that exact computation of the eigenvalues

1073-434: The image intensity I {\displaystyle I} with respect to the x {\displaystyle x} and y {\displaystyle y} axes. Angle brackets denote averaging (i.e. summation over ( u , v ) {\displaystyle (u,v)} ). w ( u , v ) {\displaystyle w(u,v)} denotes the type of window that slides over

1110-403: The image to see if a corner is present, by considering how similar a patch centered on the pixel is to nearby, largely overlapping patches. The similarity is measured by taking the sum of squared differences (SSD) between the corresponding pixels of two patches. A lower number indicates more similarity. If the pixel is in a region of uniform intensity, then the nearby patches will look similar. If

1147-440: The image. If a Box filter is used the response will be anisotropic , but if a Gaussian is used, then the response will be isotropic . A corner (or in general an interest point) is characterized by a large variation of S {\displaystyle S} in all directions of the vector [ x y ] {\displaystyle {\begin{bmatrix}x&y\end{bmatrix}}} . By analyzing

Moravec - Misplaced Pages Continue

1184-461: The normalized residual over scales. Thereby, the method has the ability to automatically adapt the scale levels for computing the image gradients to the noise level in the image data, by choosing coarser scale levels for noisy image data and finer scale levels for near ideal corner-like structures. Notes: The computation of the second moment matrix (sometimes also referred to as the structure tensor ) A {\displaystyle A} in

1221-436: The pixel is on an edge, then nearby patches in a direction perpendicular to the edge will look quite different, but nearby patches in a direction parallel to the edge will result in only a small change. If the pixel is on a feature with variation in all directions, then none of the nearby patches will look similar. The corner strength is defined as the smallest SSD between the patch and its neighbours (horizontal, vertical and on

1258-411: The same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Moravec . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moravec&oldid=1092897492 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description

1295-411: The same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Moravec . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moravec&oldid=1092897492 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description

1332-1099: The tangent lines in the window N {\displaystyle N} is: The distance from x 0 {\displaystyle \mathbf {x} _{0}} to the tangent lines T x ′ {\displaystyle T_{\mathbf {x'} }} is weighted by the gradient magnitude, thus giving more importance to tangents passing through pixels with strong gradients. Solving for x 0 {\displaystyle \mathbf {x} _{0}} : A ∈ R 2 × 2 , b ∈ R 2 × 1 , c ∈ R {\displaystyle A\in \mathbb {R} ^{2\times 2},{\textbf {b}}\in \mathbb {R} ^{2\times 1},c\in \mathbb {R} } are defined as: Minimizing this equation can be done by differentiating with respect to x {\displaystyle x} and setting it equal to 0: Note that A ∈ R 2 × 2 {\displaystyle A\in \mathbb {R} ^{2\times 2}}

1369-427: The two diagonals). The reason is that if this number is high, then the variation along all shifts is either equal to it or larger than it, so capturing that all nearby patches look different. If the corner strength number is computed for all locations, that it is locally maximal for one location indicates that a feature of interest is present in it. As pointed out by Moravec, one of the main problems with this operator

#956043