Misplaced Pages

#103896

79-419: According to Alan V. Oppenheim and Ronald W. Schafer , the principles of signal processing can be found in the classical numerical analysis techniques of the 17th century. They further state that the digital refinement of these techniques can be found in the digital control systems of the 1940s and 1950s. In 1948, Claude Shannon wrote the influential paper " A Mathematical Theory of Communication " which

158-508: A satisfiability modulo theories problem solvable by brute force (Haynal & Haynal, 2011). Most of the attempts to lower or prove the complexity of FFT algorithms have focused on the ordinary complex-data case, because it is the simplest. However, complex-data FFTs are so closely related to algorithms for related problems such as real-data FFTs, discrete cosine transforms , discrete Hartley transforms , and so on, that any improvement in one of these would immediately lead to improvements in

237-402: A DFT as a convolution, but this time of the same size (which can be zero-padded to a power of two and evaluated by radix-2 Cooley–Tukey FFTs, for example), via the identity Hexagonal fast Fourier transform (HFFT) aims at computing an efficient FFT for the hexagonally-sampled data by using a new addressing scheme for hexagonal grids, called Array Set Addressing (ASA). In many applications,

316-413: A DFT of power-of-two length n = 2 m {\displaystyle n=2^{m}} . Moreover, explicit algorithms that achieve this count are known (Heideman & Burrus , 1986; Duhamel, 1990 ). However, these algorithms require too many additions to be practical, at least on modern computers with hardware multipliers (Duhamel, 1990; Frigo & Johnson , 2005). A tight lower bound

395-453: A bound on a measure of the FFT algorithm's "asynchronicity", but the generality of this assumption is unclear. For the case of power-of-two n , Papadimitriou (1979) argued that the number n log 2 ⁡ n {\textstyle n\log _{2}n} of complex-number additions achieved by Cooley–Tukey algorithms is optimal under certain assumptions on the graph of

474-493: A complex DFT of half the length (whose real and imaginary parts are the even/odd elements of the original real data), followed by O ( n ) {\displaystyle O(n)} post-processing operations. It was once believed that real-input DFTs could be more efficiently computed by means of the discrete Hartley transform (DHT), but it was subsequently argued that a specialized real-input DFT algorithm (FFT) can typically be found that requires fewer operations than

553-440: A field where calculation of Fourier transforms presented a formidable bottleneck. While many methods in the past had focused on reducing the constant factor for O ( n 2 ) {\textstyle O(n^{2})} computation by taking advantage of "symmetries", Danielson and Lanczos realized that one could use the "periodicity" and apply a "doubling trick" to "double [ n ] with only slightly more than double

632-415: A large- n example ( n = 2 ) using a probabilistic approximate algorithm (which estimates the largest k coefficients to several decimal places). FFT algorithms have errors when finite-precision floating-point arithmetic is used, but these errors are typically quite small; most FFT algorithms, e.g. Cooley–Tukey, have excellent numerical properties as a consequence of the pairwise summation structure of

711-441: A row-column algorithm. Other, more complicated, methods include polynomial transform algorithms due to Nussbaumer (1977), which view the transform in terms of convolutions and polynomial products. See Duhamel and Vetterli (1990) for more information and references. An O ( n 5 / 2 log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n^{5/2}\log n)} generalization to spherical harmonics on

790-467: A set of d nested summations (over n j = 0 … N j − 1 {\textstyle n_{j}=0\ldots N_{j}-1} for each j ), where the division n / N = ( n 1 / N 1 , … , n d / N d ) {\textstyle \mathbf {n} /\mathbf {N} =\left(n_{1}/N_{1},\ldots ,n_{d}/N_{d}\right)}

869-555: A simple procedure checking the linearity, impulse-response, and time-shift properties of the transform on random inputs (Ergün, 1995). The values for intermediate frequencies may be obtained by various averaging methods. As defined in the multidimensional DFT article, the multidimensional DFT transforms an array x n with a d -dimensional vector of indices n = ( n 1 , … , n d ) {\textstyle \mathbf {n} =\left(n_{1},\ldots ,n_{d}\right)} by

SECTION 10

#1732772700104

948-495: A thousand times less than with direct evaluation. In practice, actual performance on modern computers is usually dominated by factors other than the speed of arithmetic operations and the analysis is a complicated subject (for example, see Frigo & Johnson , 2005), but the overall improvement from O ( n 2 ) {\textstyle O(n^{2})} to O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} remains. By far

1027-448: Is a type of non-linear signal processing, where polynomial systems may be interpreted as conceptually straightforward extensions of linear systems to the non-linear case. Statistical signal processing is an approach which treats signals as stochastic processes , utilizing their statistical properties to perform signal processing tasks. Statistical techniques are widely used in signal processing applications. For example, one can model

1106-674: Is also a principal investigator in MIT 's Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE), at the Digital Signal Processing Group. His research interests are in the general area of signal processing and its applications. He is co-author of the widely used textbooks Discrete-Time Signal Processing and Signals and Systems . He is also the editor of several advanced books on signal processing. Oppenheim received his B.S. and M.S. degrees simultaneously in 1961 and his D.Sc. degree in 1964, all in electrical engineering , from

1185-506: Is an algorithm that computes the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) of a sequence, or its inverse (IDFT). Fourier analysis converts a signal from its original domain (often time or space) to a representation in the frequency domain and vice versa. The DFT is obtained by decomposing a sequence of values into components of different frequencies. This operation is useful in many fields, but computing it directly from

1264-451: Is based on interpreting the FFT as a recursive factorization of the polynomial z n − 1 {\displaystyle z^{n}-1} , here into real-coefficient polynomials of the form z m − 1 {\displaystyle z^{m}-1} and z 2 m + a z m + 1 {\displaystyle z^{2m}+az^{m}+1} . Another polynomial viewpoint

1343-584: Is based on the compressibility (rank deficiency) of the Fourier matrix itself rather than the compressibility (sparsity) of the data. Conversely, if the data are sparse—that is, if only k out of n Fourier coefficients are nonzero—then the complexity can be reduced to O ( k log ⁡ n log ⁡ n / k ) {\displaystyle O(k\log n\log n/k)} , and this has been demonstrated to lead to practical speedups compared to an ordinary FFT for n / k > 32 in

1422-423: Is defined by the formula where e i 2 π / n {\displaystyle e^{i2\pi /n}} is a primitive n 'th root of 1. Evaluating this definition directly requires O ( n 2 ) {\textstyle O(n^{2})} operations: there are n outputs X k  , and each output requires a sum of n terms. An FFT is any method to compute

1501-526: Is described by Rokhlin and Tygert. The fast folding algorithm is analogous to the FFT, except that it operates on a series of binned waveforms rather than a series of real or complex scalar values. Rotation (which in the FFT is multiplication by a complex phasor) is a circular shift of the component waveform. Various groups have also published "FFT" algorithms for non-equispaced data, as reviewed in Potts et al. (2001). Such algorithms do not strictly compute

1580-573: Is either Analog signal processing is for signals that have not been digitized, as in most 20th-century radio , telephone, and television systems. This involves linear electronic circuits as well as nonlinear ones. The former are, for instance, passive filters , active filters , additive mixers , integrators , and delay lines . Nonlinear circuits include compandors , multipliers ( frequency mixers , voltage-controlled amplifiers ), voltage-controlled filters , voltage-controlled oscillators , and phase-locked loops . Continuous-time signal processing

1659-506: Is exploited by the Winograd FFT algorithm, which factorizes z n − 1 {\displaystyle z^{n}-1} into cyclotomic polynomials —these often have coefficients of 1, 0, or −1, and therefore require few (if any) multiplications, so Winograd can be used to obtain minimal-multiplication FFTs and is often used to find efficient algorithms for small factors. Indeed, Winograd showed that

SECTION 20

#1732772700104

1738-421: Is for sampled signals, defined only at discrete points in time, and as such are quantized in time, but not in magnitude. Analog discrete-time signal processing is a technology based on electronic devices such as sample and hold circuits, analog time-division multiplexers , analog delay lines and analog feedback shift registers . This technology was a predecessor of digital signal processing (see below), and

1817-489: Is for signals that vary with the change of continuous domain (without considering some individual interrupted points). The methods of signal processing include time domain , frequency domain , and complex frequency domain . This technology mainly discusses the modeling of a linear time-invariant continuous system, integral of the system's zero-state response, setting up system function and the continuous time filtering of deterministic signals Discrete-time signal processing

1896-437: Is not even) (see Frigo and Johnson, 2005). Still, this remains a straightforward variation of the row-column algorithm that ultimately requires only a one-dimensional FFT algorithm as the base case, and still has O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\displaystyle O(n\log n)} complexity. Yet another variation is to perform matrix transpositions in between transforming subsequent dimensions, so that

1975-599: Is not known on the number of required additions, although lower bounds have been proved under some restrictive assumptions on the algorithms. In 1973, Morgenstern proved an Ω ( n log ⁡ n ) {\displaystyle \Omega (n\log n)} lower bound on the addition count for algorithms where the multiplicative constants have bounded magnitudes (which is true for most but not all FFT algorithms). Pan (1986) proved an Ω ( n log ⁡ n ) {\displaystyle \Omega (n\log n)} lower bound assuming

2054-429: Is not rigorously proved whether DFTs truly require Ω ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle \Omega (n\log n)} (i.e., order n log ⁡ n {\displaystyle n\log n} or greater) operations, even for the simple case of power of two sizes, although no algorithms with lower complexity are known. In particular, the count of arithmetic operations

2133-765: Is often advantageous for cache locality to group the dimensions recursively. For example, a three-dimensional FFT might first perform two-dimensional FFTs of each planar "slice" for each fixed n 1 , and then perform the one-dimensional FFTs along the n 1 direction. More generally, an asymptotically optimal cache-oblivious algorithm consists of recursively dividing the dimensions into two groups ( n 1 , … , n d / 2 ) {\textstyle (n_{1},\ldots ,n_{d/2})} and ( n d / 2 + 1 , … , n d ) {\textstyle (n_{d/2+1},\ldots ,n_{d})} that are transformed recursively (rounding if d

2212-439: Is performed element-wise. Equivalently, it is the composition of a sequence of d sets of one-dimensional DFTs, performed along one dimension at a time (in any order). This compositional viewpoint immediately provides the simplest and most common multidimensional DFT algorithm, known as the row-column algorithm (after the two-dimensional case, below). That is, one simply performs a sequence of d one-dimensional FFTs (by any of

2291-704: Is still used in advanced processing of gigahertz signals. The concept of discrete-time signal processing also refers to a theoretical discipline that establishes a mathematical basis for digital signal processing, without taking quantization error into consideration. Digital signal processing is the processing of digitized discrete-time sampled signals. Processing is done by general-purpose computers or by digital circuits such as ASICs , field-programmable gate arrays or specialized digital signal processors . Typical arithmetical operations include fixed-point and floating-point , real-valued and complex-valued, multiplication and addition. Other typical operations supported by

2370-732: Is the data size. The difference in speed can be enormous, especially for long data sets where n may be in the thousands or millions. In the presence of round-off error , many FFT algorithms are much more accurate than evaluating the DFT definition directly or indirectly. There are many different FFT algorithms based on a wide range of published theories, from simple complex-number arithmetic to group theory and number theory . Fast Fourier transforms are widely used for applications in engineering, music, science, and mathematics. The basic ideas were popularized in 1965, but some algorithms had been derived as early as 1805. In 1994, Gilbert Strang described

2449-408: Is the total number of data points transformed. In particular, there are n / n 1 transforms of size n 1 , etc., so the complexity of the sequence of FFTs is: In two dimensions, the x k can be viewed as an n 1 × n 2 {\displaystyle n_{1}\times n_{2}} matrix , and this algorithm corresponds to first performing the FFT of all

Signal processing - Misplaced Pages Continue

2528-425: Is therefore limited to power-of-two sizes, but any factorization can be used in general (as was known to both Gauss and Cooley/Tukey ). These are called the radix-2 and mixed-radix cases, respectively (and other variants such as the split-radix FFT have their own names as well). Although the basic idea is recursive, most traditional implementations rearrange the algorithm to avoid explicit recursion. Also, because

2607-615: Is to minimize the total number of real multiplications and additions, sometimes called the "arithmetic complexity" (although in this context it is the exact count and not the asymptotic complexity that is being considered). Again, no tight lower bound has been proven. Since 1968, however, the lowest published count for power-of-two n was long achieved by the split-radix FFT algorithm , which requires 4 n log 2 ⁡ ( n ) − 6 n + 8 {\textstyle 4n\log _{2}(n)-6n+8} real multiplications and additions for n > 1 . This

2686-712: Is usually the focus of such questions, although actual performance on modern-day computers is determined by many other factors such as cache or CPU pipeline optimization. Following work by Shmuel Winograd (1978), a tight Θ ( n ) {\displaystyle \Theta (n)} lower bound is known for the number of real multiplications required by an FFT. It can be shown that only 4 n − 2 log 2 2 ⁡ ( n ) − 2 log 2 ⁡ ( n ) − 4 {\textstyle 4n-2\log _{2}^{2}(n)-2\log _{2}(n)-4} irrational real multiplications are required to compute

2765-407: Is where all of the radices are equal (e.g. vector-radix-2 divides all of the dimensions by two), but this is not necessary. Vector radix with only a single non-unit radix at a time, i.e. r = ( 1 , … , 1 , r , 1 , … , 1 ) {\textstyle \mathbf {r} =\left(1,\ldots ,1,r,1,\ldots ,1\right)} , is essentially

2844-529: The O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} scaling. Tukey came up with the idea during a meeting of President Kennedy 's Science Advisory Committee where a discussion topic involved detecting nuclear tests by the Soviet Union by setting up sensors to surround the country from outside. To analyze the output of these sensors, an FFT algorithm would be needed. In discussion with Tukey, Richard Garwin recognized

2923-1061: The IEEE Centennial Medal (1984), the IEEE Education Medal (1988), the IEEE Third Millennium Medal (2000), the IEEE Jack S. Kilby Signal Processing Medal (2007), the Society Award, the Technical Achievement Award and the Senior Award of the IEEE Society on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. He has also received a number of awards at MIT for excellence in teaching. Oppenheim is author or co-author of many books, including: Fast Fourier transform A fast Fourier transform ( FFT )

3002-534: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology . His dissertation Superposition in a Class of Nonlinear Systems was written under the direction of Amar Bose . He is also the recipient of an honorary doctorate from Tel Aviv University (1995). In 1964, Oppenheim joined the faculty at MIT, where he is currently Ford Professor of Engineering and a MacVicar Faculty Fellow. Since 1967 he has been affiliated with MIT Lincoln Laboratory and since 1977 with

3081-661: The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution . Oppenheim was elected a member of the National Academy of Engineering for innovative research, writing of pioneering textbooks, and inspired teaching in the field of digital signal processing. He is a fellow of the IEEE, a member of Sigma Xi and ΗΚΝ. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow and a Sackler Fellow . He has also received a number of awards for outstanding research and teaching, including

3160-474: The discrete cosine / sine transform(s) ( DCT / DST ). Instead of directly modifying an FFT algorithm for these cases, DCTs/DSTs can also be computed via FFTs of real data combined with O ( n ) {\displaystyle O(n)} pre- and post-processing. A fundamental question of longstanding theoretical interest is to prove lower bounds on the complexity and exact operation counts of fast Fourier transforms, and many open problems remain. It

3239-463: The prime-factor (Good–Thomas) algorithm (PFA), based on the Chinese remainder theorem , to factorize the DFT similarly to Cooley–Tukey but without the twiddle factors. The Rader–Brenner algorithm (1976) is a Cooley–Tukey-like factorization but with purely imaginary twiddle factors, reducing multiplications at the cost of increased additions and reduced numerical stability ; it was later superseded by

Signal processing - Misplaced Pages Continue

3318-402: The probability distribution of noise incurred when photographing an image, and construct techniques based on this model to reduce the noise in the resulting image. In communication systems, signal processing may occur at: Alan V. Oppenheim Alan Victor Oppenheim (born 1937) is a professor of engineering at MIT 's Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science . He

3397-425: The root mean square (rms) errors are much better than these upper bounds, being only O ( ε log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(\varepsilon {\sqrt {\log n}})} for Cooley–Tukey and O ( ε n ) {\textstyle O(\varepsilon {\sqrt {n}})} for the naïve DFT (Schatzman, 1996). These results, however, are very sensitive to

3476-572: The split-radix variant of Cooley–Tukey (which achieves the same multiplication count but with fewer additions and without sacrificing accuracy). Algorithms that recursively factorize the DFT into smaller operations other than DFTs include the Bruun and QFT algorithms. (The Rader–Brenner and QFT algorithms were proposed for power-of-two sizes, but it is possible that they could be adapted to general composite n . Bruun's algorithm applies to arbitrary even composite sizes.) Bruun's algorithm , in particular,

3555-496: The Cooley–Tukey algorithm (Welch, 1969). Achieving this accuracy requires careful attention to scaling to minimize loss of precision, and fixed-point FFT algorithms involve rescaling at each intermediate stage of decompositions like Cooley–Tukey. To verify the correctness of an FFT implementation, rigorous guarantees can be obtained in O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} time by

3634-465: The Cooley–Tukey algorithm breaks the DFT into smaller DFTs, it can be combined arbitrarily with any other algorithm for the DFT, such as those described below. There are FFT algorithms other than Cooley–Tukey. For n = n 1 n 2 {\textstyle n=n_{1}n_{2}} with coprime n 1 {\textstyle n_{1}} and n 2 {\textstyle n_{2}} , one can use

3713-410: The DFT (which is only defined for equispaced data), but rather some approximation thereof (a non-uniform discrete Fourier transform , or NDFT, which itself is often computed only approximately). More generally there are various other methods of spectral estimation . The FFT is used in digital recording, sampling, additive synthesis and pitch correction software. The FFT's importance derives from

3792-548: The DFT can be computed with only O ( n ) {\displaystyle O(n)} irrational multiplications, leading to a proven achievable lower bound on the number of multiplications for power-of-two sizes; this comes at the cost of many more additions, a tradeoff no longer favorable on modern processors with hardware multipliers . In particular, Winograd also makes use of the PFA as well as an algorithm by Rader for FFTs of prime sizes. Rader's algorithm , exploiting

3871-428: The DFT's sums directly involves n 2 {\textstyle n^{2}} complex multiplications and n ( n − 1 ) {\textstyle n(n-1)} complex additions, of which O ( n ) {\textstyle O(n)} operations can be saved by eliminating trivial operations such as multiplications by 1, leaving about 30 million operations. In contrast,

3950-614: The FFT as "the most important numerical algorithm of our lifetime", and it was included in Top 10 Algorithms of 20th Century by the IEEE magazine Computing in Science & Engineering . The best-known FFT algorithms depend upon the factorization of n , but there are FFTs with O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\displaystyle O(n\log n)} complexity for all, even prime , n . Many FFT algorithms depend only on

4029-458: The above algorithms): first you transform along the n 1 dimension, then along the n 2 dimension, and so on (actually, any ordering works). This method is easily shown to have the usual O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} complexity, where n = n 1 ⋅ n 2 ⋯ n d {\textstyle n=n_{1}\cdot n_{2}\cdots n_{d}}

SECTION 50

#1732772700104

4108-615: The accuracy of the twiddle factors used in the FFT (i.e. the trigonometric function values), and it is not unusual for incautious FFT implementations to have much worse accuracy, e.g. if they use inaccurate trigonometric recurrence formulas. Some FFTs other than Cooley–Tukey, such as the Rader–Brenner algorithm, are intrinsically less stable. In fixed-point arithmetic , the finite-precision errors accumulated by FFT algorithms are worse, with rms errors growing as O ( n ) {\textstyle O({\sqrt {n}})} for

4187-645: The algorithm (his assumptions imply, among other things, that no additive identities in the roots of unity are exploited). (This argument would imply that at least 2 N log 2 ⁡ N {\textstyle 2N\log _{2}N} real additions are required, although this is not a tight bound because extra additions are required as part of complex-number multiplications.) Thus far, no published FFT algorithm has achieved fewer than n log 2 ⁡ n {\textstyle n\log _{2}n} complex-number additions (or their equivalent) for power-of-two n . A third problem

4266-431: The algorithms. The upper bound on the relative error for the Cooley–Tukey algorithm is O ( ε log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(\varepsilon \log n)} , compared to O ( ε n 3 / 2 ) {\textstyle O(\varepsilon n^{3/2})} for the naïve DFT formula, where 𝜀 is the machine floating-point relative precision. In fact,

4345-400: The corresponding DHT algorithm (FHT) for the same number of inputs. Bruun's algorithm (above) is another method that was initially proposed to take advantage of real inputs, but it has not proved popular. There are further FFT specializations for the cases of real data that have even/odd symmetry, in which case one can gain another factor of roughly two in time and memory and the DFT becomes

4424-546: The definition is often too slow to be practical. An FFT rapidly computes such transformations by factorizing the DFT matrix into a product of sparse (mostly zero) factors. As a result, it manages to reduce the complexity of computing the DFT from O ( n 2 ) {\textstyle O(n^{2})} , which arises if one simply applies the definition of DFT, to O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} , where n

4503-426: The existence of a generator for the multiplicative group modulo prime n , expresses a DFT of prime size n as a cyclic convolution of (composite) size n – 1 , which can then be computed by a pair of ordinary FFTs via the convolution theorem (although Winograd uses other convolution methods). Another prime-size FFT is due to L. I. Bluestein, and is sometimes called the chirp-z algorithm ; it also re-expresses

4582-549: The fact that e − 2 π i / n {\textstyle e^{-2\pi i/n}} is an n 'th primitive root of unity , and thus can be applied to analogous transforms over any finite field , such as number-theoretic transforms . Since the inverse DFT is the same as the DFT, but with the opposite sign in the exponent and a 1/ n factor, any FFT algorithm can easily be adapted for it. The development of fast algorithms for DFT can be traced to Carl Friedrich Gauss 's unpublished 1805 work on

4661-610: The fact that it has made working in the frequency domain equally computationally feasible as working in the temporal or spatial domain. Some of the important applications of the FFT include: An original application of the FFT in finance particularly in the Valuation of options was developed by Marcello Minenna. Despite its strengths, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) has limitations, particularly when analyzing signals with non-stationary frequency content—where

4740-458: The frequency characteristics change over time. The FFT provides a global frequency representation, meaning it analyzes frequency information across the entire signal duration. This global perspective makes it challenging to detect short-lived or transient features within signals, as the FFT assumes that all frequency components are present throughout the entire signal. For cases where frequency information varies over time, alternative transforms like

4819-452: The general applicability of the algorithm not just to national security problems, but also to a wide range of problems including one of immediate interest to him, determining the periodicities of the spin orientations in a 3-D crystal of Helium-3. Garwin gave Tukey's idea to Cooley (both worked at IBM's Watson labs ) for implementation. Cooley and Tukey published the paper in a relatively short time of six months. As Tukey did not work at IBM,

SECTION 60

#1732772700104

4898-429: The general idea of an FFT) was popularized by a publication of Cooley and Tukey in 1965, but it was later discovered that those two authors had together independently re-invented an algorithm known to Carl Friedrich Gauss around 1805 (and subsequently rediscovered several times in limited forms). The best known use of the Cooley–Tukey algorithm is to divide the transform into two pieces of size n/2 at each step, and

4977-710: The hardware are circular buffers and lookup tables . Examples of algorithms are the fast Fourier transform (FFT), finite impulse response (FIR) filter, Infinite impulse response (IIR) filter, and adaptive filters such as the Wiener and Kalman filters . Nonlinear signal processing involves the analysis and processing of signals produced from nonlinear systems and can be in the time, frequency , or spatiotemporal domains. Nonlinear systems can produce highly complex behaviors including bifurcations , chaos , harmonics , and subharmonics which cannot be produced or analyzed using linear methods. Polynomial signal processing

5056-415: The help of a fast multipole method . A wavelet -based approximate FFT by Guo and Burrus (1996) takes sparse inputs/outputs (time/frequency localization) into account more efficiently than is possible with an exact FFT. Another algorithm for approximate computation of a subset of the DFT outputs is due to Shentov et al. (1995). The Edelman algorithm works equally well for sparse and non-sparse data, since it

5135-442: The input data for the DFT are purely real, in which case the outputs satisfy the symmetry and efficient FFT algorithms have been designed for this situation (see e.g. Sorensen, 1987). One approach consists of taking an ordinary algorithm (e.g. Cooley–Tukey) and removing the redundant parts of the computation, saving roughly a factor of two in time and memory. Alternatively, it is possible to express an even -length real-input DFT as

5214-411: The labor", though like Gauss they did not do the analysis to discover that this led to O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} scaling. James Cooley and John Tukey independently rediscovered these earlier algorithms and published a more general FFT in 1965 that is applicable when n is composite and not necessarily a power of 2, as well as analyzing

5293-614: The most commonly used FFT is the Cooley–Tukey algorithm. This is a divide-and-conquer algorithm that recursively breaks down a DFT of any composite size n = n 1 n 2 {\textstyle n=n_{1}n_{2}} into n 1 {\textstyle n_{1}} smaller DFTs of size n 2 {\textstyle n_{2}} , along with O ( n ) {\displaystyle O(n)} multiplications by complex roots of unity traditionally called twiddle factors (after Gentleman and Sande, 1966). This method (and

5372-457: The orbits of asteroids Pallas and Juno . Gauss wanted to interpolate the orbits from sample observations; his method was very similar to the one that would be published in 1965 by James Cooley and John Tukey , who are generally credited for the invention of the modern generic FFT algorithm. While Gauss's work predated even Joseph Fourier 's 1822 results, he did not analyze the method's complexity , and eventually used other methods to achieve

5451-562: The others (Duhamel & Vetterli, 1990). All of the FFT algorithms discussed above compute the DFT exactly (i.e. neglecting floating-point errors). A few "FFT" algorithms have been proposed, however, that compute the DFT approximately , with an error that can be made arbitrarily small at the expense of increased computations. Such algorithms trade the approximation error for increased speed or other properties. For example, an approximate FFT algorithm by Edelman et al. (1999) achieves lower communication requirements for parallel computing with

5530-400: The patentability of the idea was doubted and the algorithm went into the public domain, which, through the computing revolution of the next decade, made FFT one of the indispensable algorithms in digital signal processing . Let x 0 , … , x n − 1 {\displaystyle x_{0},\ldots ,x_{n-1}} be complex numbers . The DFT

5609-483: The radix-2 Cooley–Tukey algorithm , for n a power of 2, can compute the same result with only ( n / 2 ) log 2 ⁡ ( n ) {\textstyle (n/2)\log _{2}(n)} complex multiplications (again, ignoring simplifications of multiplications by 1 and similar) and n log 2 ⁡ ( n ) {\textstyle n\log _{2}(n)} complex additions, in total about 30,000 operations —

5688-401: The rows (resp. columns), grouping the resulting transformed rows (resp. columns) together as another n 1 × n 2 {\displaystyle n_{1}\times n_{2}} matrix, and then performing the FFT on each of the columns (resp. rows) of this second matrix, and similarly grouping the results into the final result matrix. In more than two dimensions, it

5767-456: The same end. Between 1805 and 1965, some versions of FFT were published by other authors. Frank Yates in 1932 published his version called interaction algorithm , which provided efficient computation of Hadamard and Walsh transforms . Yates' algorithm is still used in the field of statistical design and analysis of experiments. In 1942, G. C. Danielson and Cornelius Lanczos published their version to compute DFT for x-ray crystallography ,

5846-519: The same results in O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} operations. All known FFT algorithms require O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} operations, although there is no known proof that lower complexity is impossible. To illustrate the savings of an FFT, consider the count of complex multiplications and additions for n = 4096 {\textstyle n=4096} data points. Evaluating

5925-486: The simplest non-row-column FFT is the vector-radix FFT algorithm , which is a generalization of the ordinary Cooley–Tukey algorithm where one divides the transform dimensions by a vector r = ( r 1 , r 2 , … , r d ) {\textstyle \mathbf {r} =\left(r_{1},r_{2},\ldots ,r_{d}\right)} of radices at each step. (This may also have cache benefits.) The simplest case of vector-radix

6004-500: The sphere S with n nodes was described by Mohlenkamp, along with an algorithm conjectured (but not proven) to have O ( n 2 log 2 ⁡ ( n ) ) {\textstyle O(n^{2}\log ^{2}(n))} complexity; Mohlenkamp also provides an implementation in the libftsh library. A spherical-harmonic algorithm with O ( n 2 log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n^{2}\log n)} complexity

6083-427: The transforms operate on contiguous data; this is especially important for out-of-core and distributed memory situations where accessing non-contiguous data is extremely time-consuming. There are other multidimensional FFT algorithms that are distinct from the row-column algorithm, although all of them have O ( n log ⁡ n ) {\textstyle O(n\log n)} complexity. Perhaps

6162-569: Was published in the Bell System Technical Journal . The paper laid the groundwork for later development of information communication systems and the processing of signals for transmission. Signal processing matured and flourished in the 1960s and 1970s, and digital signal processing became widely used with specialized digital signal processor chips in the 1980s. A signal is a function x ( t ) {\displaystyle x(t)} , where this function

6241-494: Was recently reduced to ∼ 34 9 n log 2 ⁡ n {\textstyle \sim {\frac {34}{9}}n\log _{2}n} (Johnson and Frigo, 2007; Lundy and Van Buskirk, 2007 ). A slightly larger count (but still better than split radix for n ≥ 256 ) was shown to be provably optimal for n ≤ 512 under additional restrictions on the possible algorithms (split-radix-like flowgraphs with unit-modulus multiplicative factors), by reduction to

#103896