The Spanish Treaty Claims Commission was established by the United States at the conclusion of the Spanish–American War for the purpose of carrying out one of the terms of the treaty ending the war. The Commission was created by an Act of Congress approved March 2, 1901. Working from 1901 to 1910, the Commission resolved nearly $ 65 million in claims, and awarded less than $ 1.5 million.
68-519: Under Article VII of the 1898 Treaty of Paris , the United States assumed responsibility for the payment of all claims of her own citizens for which Spain would have been liable under principles of international law . Thus, in proceedings before the Commission, the United States government was effectively required to stand in the shoes of its defeated adversary, Spain, and to defend against
136-668: A Filipino lawyer who represented the First Philippine Republic , was denied participation in the negotiation. For almost a month, negotiations revolved around Cuba. The Teller Amendment to the declaration of war made it impractical for the United States to annex the island as it had with Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines. At first, Spain refused to accept the Cuban national debt of four hundred million dollars, but ultimately, it had no choice. Eventually, it
204-455: A battle between armies. This changed the course of debate in the Senate in favor of ratification. The treaty was eventually approved on February 6, 1899, by a vote of 57 to 27, just over the two-thirds majority required. Only two Republicans voted against ratification: George Frisbie Hoar of Massachusetts and Eugene Pryor Hale of Maine . Senator Nelson W. Aldrich had opposed entry into
272-565: A binding treaty without seeking parliamentary approval. Nevertheless, most treaties are tabled in parliament for between 15 and 20 joint sitting days for scrutiny by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, and if implementation of treaties requires legislation by the Australian parliament , this must be passed by both houses prior to ratification. [1] The President makes a treaty in exercise of his executive power, on
340-491: A great nation on whose growth and career from the beginning the ruler of nations has plainly written the high command and pledge of civilization. Incidental to our tenure in the Philippines is the commercial opportunity to which American statesmanship cannot be indifferent. It is just to use every legitimate means for the enlargement of American trade; but we seek no advantages in the Orient which are not common to all. Asking only
408-457: A major cultural impact in Spain known as the " Generation of '98 ". It marked the beginning of the United States as a world power . In the U.S., many supporters of the war opposed the treaty, which became one of the major issues in the election of 1900 when it was opposed by Democrat William Jennings Bryan , who opposed imperialism. Republican President William McKinley supported the treaty and
476-575: A majority of both houses of Congress as a regular law. If the agreement is completely within the President's constitutional powers, it can be made by the President alone without Congressional approval, but it will have the force of an executive order and can be unilaterally revoked by a future President. All types of agreements are treated internationally as "treaties". See Foreign policy of the United States#Law . Federations usually require
544-431: A result of resolutions adopted by two-thirds (presently at least 34 out of 50) of the states' legislatures. For a proposed amendment to be adopted, three-quarters of the states (presently at least 38 out of 50) must then ratify the amendment either by a vote of approval in each state's legislature or by state ratifying conventions . Congress may specify which method must be used to ratify the amendment. Congress may also set
612-644: A treaty to which the Senate did not advise and consent to ratification is the Treaty of Versailles , which failed to garner support because of the Covenant of the League of Nations . The US can also enter into international agreements by way of executive agreements . They are not made under the Treaty Clause and do not require approval by two-thirds of the Senate. Congressional-executive agreements are passed by
680-589: A valuation that had been estimated in internal discussions in October, and requested an answer within two days. Montero Ríos said angrily that he could reply at once, but the American delegation had already departed from the conference table. When the two sides met again, Queen-Regent Maria Christina had cabled her acceptance. Montero Ríos then recited his formal reply: The Government of Her Majesty, moved by lofty reasons of patriotism and humanity, will not assume
748-552: A vulgar, commonplace empire, controlling subject races and vassal states, in which one class must forever rule and other classes must forever obey. Some anti-expansionists stated that the treaty committed the United States to a course of empire and violated the most basic tenets of the constitution . They argued that neither the Congress nor the President had the right to pass laws that governed colonial peoples who were not represented by lawmakers. Some Senate expansionists supported
SECTION 10
#1732776555080816-601: Is always accomplished by filing instruments of ratification as provided for in the treaty. In many democracies, the legislature authorizes the government to ratify treaties through standard legislative procedures by passing a bill. In Australia , power to enter into treaties is an executive power within Section 61 of the Australian Constitution so the Australian Government may enter into
884-444: Is an employee not normally responsible for procuring supplies contracting to do so on the employer's behalf. The employer's choice on discovering the contract is to ratify it or to repudiate it. The latter situation is common in trade union collective bargaining agreements . The union authorizes one or more people to negotiate and sign an agreement with management. A collective bargaining agreement can not become legally binding until
952-579: Is usually accomplished by exchanging the requisite instruments, and in the case of multilateral treaties, the usual procedure is for the depositary to collect the ratifications of all states, keeping all parties informed of the situation. The institution of ratification grants states the necessary time-frame to seek the required approval for the treaty on the domestic level and to enact the necessary legislation to give domestic effect to that treaty. The term applies to private contract law , international treaties , and constitutions in federal states such as
1020-658: The Spanish–American War . Under it, Spain relinquished all claim of sovereignty over and title to territories described there as the island of Porto Rico and other islands now under Spanish sovereignty in the West Indies, and the island of Guam in the Marianas or Ladrones, the archipelago known as the Philippine Islands, and comprehending the islands lying within the following line: (details elided), to
1088-471: The United States and Canada . The term is also used in parliamentary procedure in deliberative assemblies . In contract law , the need for ratification often arises in two ways: if the agent attempts to bind the principal despite lacking the authority to do so; and if the principal authorizes the agent to make an agreement, but reserves the right to approve it. An example of the former situation
1156-560: The 1890s, led by José Martí . The Philippines at this time also became resistant to Spanish colonial rule. August 26, 1896, presented the first call to revolt, led by Andrés Bonifacio , succeeded by Emilio Aguinaldo y Famy . Aguinaldo then negotiated the Pact of Biak-na-Bato with the Spaniards and went into exile to Hong Kong along with the other revolutionary leaders. The Spanish–American War that followed had overwhelming public support in
1224-414: The Commission the purpose and spirit with which the United States accepted the unwelcome necessity of war should be kept constantly in view. We took up arms only in obedience to the dictates of humanity and in the fulfillment of high public and moral obligations. We had no design of aggrandizement and no ambition of conquest. Through the long course of repeated representations which preceded and aimed to avert
1292-833: The High Courts in the States (Chapter IV of Part V and Chapter V of Part VI); the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States (Chapter I of Part XI and Seventh Schedule); the representation of States in Parliament; and the provision for amendment of the Constitution laid down in Article 368. Ratification is done by a resolution passed by the State Legislatures. There is no specific time limit for
1360-603: The Indian constitution before the ratification by the Parliament . Article VII of the Constitution of the United States describes the process by which the entire document was to become effective. It required that conventions of nine of the thirteen original States ratify the Constitution. If fewer than thirteen states ratified the document, it would become effective only among the states ratifying it. New Hampshire
1428-469: The Legislatures of not less than one-half of the States. These provisions relate to certain matters concerning the federal structure or of common interest to both the Union and the States viz., the election of the President (articles 54 and 55); the extent of the executive power of the Union and the States (Articles 73 and 162); the High Courts for Union territories (Article 241); The Union Judiciary and
SECTION 20
#17327765550801496-632: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs. At the first session, on October 1, the Spanish demanded that before the talks got underway, the return of the city of Manila , which had been captured by the Americans a few hours after the signing of the peace protocol in Washington, to Spanish authority. The Americans refused to consider the idea and, for the moment, it was pursued no further. Felipe Agoncillo ,
1564-617: The Spanish–American War but supported McKinley after it began. He played a central role in winning the treaty's two-thirds majority ratification. The Treaty of Paris provided for the independence of Cuba from Spain, but the U.S. Congress ensured indirect U.S. control by the Platt Amendment and the Teller Amendment . Spain relinquished all claims of sovereignty over and title to Cuba. Upon Spain's departure, Cuba
1632-411: The United States due to the popular fervor towards supporting Cuban freedom. On September 16, President William McKinley issued secret written instructions to his emissaries as the Spanish–American War drew to a close: By a protocol signed at Washington August 12, 1898 . . . it was agreed that the United States and Spain would each appoint not more than five commissioners to treat of peace, and that
1700-476: The United States. The Commission's awards totalled $ 1,387,845.74. Treaty of Paris (1898) Events/Artifacts (north to south) Events/Artifacts Artifacts The Treaty of Peace between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Spain , commonly known as the Treaty of Paris of 1898 , was signed by Spain and the United States on December 10, 1898, that ended
1768-489: The United States. The cession of the Philippines involved a compensation of $ 20 million from the United States to Spain. The treaty came into effect on April 11, 1899, when the documents of ratification were exchanged. It was the first treaty negotiated between the two governments since the 1819 Adams–Onís Treaty . The Treaty of Paris marked the end of the Spanish Empire , apart from some small holdings. It had
1836-650: The acquisition of only the naval base in Manila, as a "hitching post." Others had recommended retaining only the island of Luzon . However, in discussions with its advisers, the commission concluded that Spain, if it retained part of the Philippines, would be likely to sell it to another European power, which would likely be troublesome for America. On November 25, the American Commission cabled McKinley for explicit instructions. Their cable crossed one from McKinley saying that duty left him no choice but to demand
1904-554: The agreement entered into by the executive thereby making it enforceable by the courts of India, it may do so under Article 253 of the constitution. In Japan , in principle both houses of the parliament (the National Diet ) must approve the treaty for ratification. If the House of Councilors rejects a treaty approved by the House of Representatives , and a joint committee of both houses cannot come to agreement on amendments to
1972-580: The aid and the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister , and no court of law in India may question its validity. However, no agreement or treaty entered into by the president is enforceable by the courts which is incompatible with Indian constitution/ national law, as India follows dualist theory for the implementation of international laws. If the Parliament wishes to codify
2040-563: The claims of its own citizens by defending the actions or omissions of Spain. President William McKinley appointed the original members of the Commission in 1901. The original Commissioners were recently defeated U.S. Senator William E. Chandler of New Hampshire (who was chosen as president), Gerrit J. Diekema of Michigan, James P. Wood of Ohio, William Arden Maury of the District of Columbia, and William L. Chambers of Alabama. Diekema resigned in 1907 upon his election to Congress, and
2108-449: The commissioners so appointed shall meet at Paris not later than Oct. 1, 1898, and proceed to the negotiation and conclusion of a treaty of peace, which treaty shall be subject to ratification according to the respective constitutional forms of the two countries. The composition of the American commission was somewhat unusual in that three of its members were senators, which meant, as many newspapers pointed out, that they would later vote on
Spanish Treaty Claims Commission - Misplaced Pages Continue
2176-441: The commissioners so appointed should meet at Paris not later than October 1, 1898, and proceed to the negotiation and conclusion of a treaty of peace, which treaty should be subject to ratification according to the respective constitutional forms of the two countries. For the purpose of carrying into effect this stipulation, I have appointed you as commissioners on the part of the United States to meet and confer with commissioners on
2244-509: The common good under the demands of civilization, rather than to ambitious designs. The terms of the protocol were framed upon this consideration. The abandonment of the Western Hemisphere by Spain was an imperative necessity. In presenting that requirement, we only fulfilled a duty universally acknowledged. It involves no ungenerous reference to our recent foe, but simply a recognition of the plain teachings of history, to say that it
2312-411: The concluding settlement as it was just and humane in its original action. The luster and the moral strength attaching to a cause which can be confidently rested upon the considerate judgment of the world should not under any illusion of the hour be dimmed by ulterior designs which might tempt us into excessive demands or into an adventurous departure on untried paths. It is believed that the true glory and
2380-415: The enduring interests of the country will most surely be served if an unselfish duty conscientiously accepted and a signal triumph honorably achieved shall be crowned by such an example of moderation, restraint, and reason in victory as best comports with the traditions and character of our enlightened republic. Our aim in the adjustment of peace should be directed to lasting results and to the achievement of
2448-422: The entire archipelago. The next morning, another cable from McKinley arrived: to accept merely Luzon, leaving the rest of the islands subject to Spanish rule, or to be the subject of future contention, cannot be justified on political, commercial, or humanitarian grounds. The cessation must be the whole archipelago or none. The latter is wholly inadmissible, and the former must therefore be required. This position
2516-556: The final draft of the treaty began on November 30. It was signed on December 10, 1898. In Madrid , the Cortes Generales , Spain's legislature, rejected the treaty, but Maria Christina signed it as she was empowered to do by a clause in the Spanish constitution. In the Senate , there were four main schools of thought on U.S. imperialism that influenced the debate on the treaty's ratification. Republicans generally supported
2584-626: The government . By a convention called the Ponsonby Rule , treaties were usually placed before Parliament for 21 days before ratification, but Parliament has no power to veto or to ratify. The Ponsonby Rule was put on a statutory footing by Part 2 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 . Treaty power is a coordinated effort between the Executive branch and the Senate. The President may form and negotiate, but
2652-444: The insurrection and in violation of the 1795 Pinckney's Treaty between the two nations. The majority of the claims paid by the Commission arose out of appropriations of land, livestock and other property by Spain. Where the Commission concluded that damages were the result of destruction that was justifiable under the rules and usages of war, the claims were denied. The largest specific item of destruction for which claims were filed
2720-480: The island of Luzon. It is desirable, however, that the United States shall acquire the right of entry for vessels and merchandise belonging to citizens of the United States into such ports of the Philippines as are not ceded to the United States upon terms of equal favor with Spanish ships and merchandise, both in relation to port and customs charges and rates of trade and commerce, together with other rights of protection and trade accorded to citizens of one country within
2788-464: The need for claimants to hold U.S. citizenship gave rise to disputes regarding their nationality. The Commission also faced important legal questions, including the validity of claims arising from damages incurred during battles between Cuban insurgents and Spanish forces. Twenty-one claims, totalling $ 279,750, were paid for personal injuries suffered by U.S. citizens at the hands of Spanish military authorities, usually when detained on suspicion of aiding
Spanish Treaty Claims Commission - Misplaced Pages Continue
2856-418: The new government. Ratification by those states was secured—Virginia on June 25 and New York on July 26—and the government under the Constitution began on March 4, 1789. For subsequent amendments, Article V describes the process of a potential amendment 's adoption. Proposals to adopt an amendment may be called either by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress or by a national convention as
2924-420: The open door for ourselves, we are ready to accord the open door to others. The commercial opportunity which is naturally and inevitably associated with this new opening depends less on large territorial possession than upon an adequate commercial basis and upon broad and equal privileges. . . . In view of what has been stated, the United States cannot accept less than the cession in full right and sovereignty of
2992-569: The original text of the treaty, or the House of Councilors fails to decide on a treaty for more than thirty days, the House of Representatives the will be regarded as the vote of the National Diet approving the ratification. The approved treaty will then be promulgated into law by the act of the Emperor . Treaty ratification is a royal prerogative , exercised by the monarch on the advice of
3060-425: The part of Spain. As an essential preliminary to the agreement to appoint commissioners to treat of peace, this government required of that of Spain the unqualified concession of the following precise demands: These demands were conceded by Spain, and their concession was, as you will perceive, solemnly recorded in the protocol of the 12th of August. . . . It is my wish that throughout the negotiations entrusted to
3128-431: The presence and success of our arms at Manila imposes upon us obligations which we cannot disregard. The march of events rules and overrules human action. Avowing unreservedly the purpose which has animated all our effort, and still solicitous to adhere to it, we cannot be unmindful that, without any desire or design on our part, the war has brought us new duties and responsibilities which we must meet and discharge as becomes
3196-406: The ratification of an amending Bill by the State Legislatures. However, the resolutions ratifying the proposed amendment must be passed before the amending Bill is presented to the President for his assent. However, when the treaty terms are interfering with the powers exclusively applicable to states ( State List ), prior ratification of all applicable states are to be obtained per Article 252 of
3264-463: The ratification of their own negotiations. These were American delegation's members: The Spanish commission included the following Spanish diplomats: The American delegation, headed by former Secretary of State William R. Day , who had vacated his position as U.S. Secretary of State to head the commission, arrived in Paris on September 26, 1898. The negotiations were conducted in a suite of rooms at
3332-407: The responsibility of again bringing upon Spain all the horrors of war. In order to avoid them, it resigns itself to the painful task of submitting to the law of the victor, however harsh it may be, and as Spain lacks the material means to defend the rights she believes hers, having recorded them, she accepts the only terms the United States offers her for the concluding of the treaty of peace. Work on
3400-465: The struggle, and in the final arbitrament of force, this country was impelled solely by the purpose of relieving grievous wrongs and removing long-existing conditions which disturbed its tranquillity, which shocked the moral sense of mankind, and which could no longer be endured. It is my earnest wish that the United States in making peace should follow the same high rule of conduct which guided it in facing war. It should be as scrupulous and magnanimous in
3468-416: The support of both the federal government and some given percentage of the constituent governments for amendments to the federal constitution to take effect. Not all constitutional amendments in India require ratification by the states. Only constitutional amendments that seek to make any change in any of the provisions mentioned in the proviso to Article 368 of the Constitution of India, must be ratified by
SECTION 50
#17327765550803536-459: The territory of another. You are therefore instructed to demand such concession, agreeing on your part that Spain shall have similar rights as to her subjects and vessels in the ports of any territory in the Philippines ceded to the United States. Article V of the peace protocol between United States and Spain on August 12, 1898, read as follows: The United States and Spain will each appoint not more than five commissioners to treat of peace, and
3604-494: The treaty and reinforced such views by arguing: Suppose we reject the Treaty. We continue the state of war. We repudiate the President. We are branded as a people incapable of taking rank as one of the greatest of world powers! Providence has given the United States the duty of extending Christian civilization. We come as ministering angels, not despots. Expansionists said that the Constitution applied only to citizens, an idea that
3672-496: The treaty is then forwarded to the floor of the full Senate for such a vote. The treaty or legislation does not apply until it has been ratified. A multilateral agreement may provide that it will take effect upon its ratification by less than all of the signatories. Even though such a treaty takes effect, it does not apply to signatories that have not ratified it. Accession has the same legal effect as ratification, for treaties already negotiated and signed by other states. An example of
3740-581: The treaty must be advised and consented to by a two-thirds vote in the Senate . Only after the Senate approves the treaty can the President ratify it. Once it is ratified, it becomes binding on all the states under the Supremacy Clause . While the House of Representatives does not vote on it at all, the supermajority requirement for the Senate's advice and consent to ratification makes it considerably more difficult to rally enough political support for international treaties. Also, if implementation of
3808-579: The treaty requires the expenditure of funds, the House of Representatives may be able to block or at least impede such implementation by refusing to vote for the appropriation of the necessary funds. The President usually submits a treaty to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) along with an accompanying resolution of ratification or accession. If the treaty and resolution receive favorable committee consideration (a committee vote in favor of ratification or accession),
3876-559: The treaty, but those opposed either aimed to defeat the treaty or exclude the provision that stipulated the acquisition of the Philippines. Most Democrats favored expansion as well, particularly in the South. A minority of Democrats also favored the treaty on the basis of ending the war and granting independence to Cuba and the Philippines. During the Senate debate on ratification, Senators George Frisbie Hoar and George Graham Vest were outspoken opponents. Hoar stated: This Treaty will make us
3944-444: The union members ratify the agreement. If the union members do not approve it, the agreement is void, and negotiations resume. A deliberative assembly , using parliamentary procedure , could ratify action that otherwise was not validly taken. For example, action taken where there was no quorum at the meeting is not valid until it is later ratified at a meeting where a quorum is present. The ratification of international treaties
4012-561: Was agreed that Cuba was to be granted independence and for the Cuban debt to be assumed by Spain. It was also agreed that Spain would cede Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States. The negotiators then turned to the question of the Philippines . Spanish negotiators were determined to hang onto all they could and hoped to cede only Mindanao and perhaps the Sulu Islands . On the American side, Chairman Day had once recommended
4080-515: Was assisted by future federal judge Charles B. Witmer . U.S. citizens were given six months to submit their claims to the Commission, although timely claims were sometimes amended after that deadline. Adjudicating the claims was often difficult because of logistical challenges. In the main, the witnesses were not in the United States where the Commission worked, but were in Cuba or Spain. Officials in Spain were initially noncooperative. For some claims,
4148-716: Was later supported by the Supreme Court in the Insular Cases . As the Senate debate continued, Andrew Carnegie and former President Grover Cleveland petitioned the Senate to reject the treaty. Both men adamantly opposed such imperialist policies and participated in the American Anti-Imperialist League , along with other such prominent members as Mark Twain and Samuel Gompers . Fighting erupted between Filipino and American forces in Manila on February 4, and quickly escalated into
SECTION 60
#17327765550804216-445: Was not compatible with the assurance of permanent peace on and near our own territory that the Spanish flag should remain on this side of the sea. This lesson of events and of reason left no alternative as to Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the other islands belonging to Spain in this hemisphere. The Philippines stand upon a different basis. It is nonetheless true, however, that without any original thought of complete or even partial acquisition,
4284-429: Was proposed by U.S. negotiators, though they considered it unsound, and was formally rejected on November 4. Seeking a solution to avoid collapse of the negotiations, Senator Frye suggested offering Spain ten or twenty million dollars for the islands. The State Department approved, though they considered this odious. After some discussion, the American delegation offered twenty million dollars on November 21, one tenth of
4352-476: Was reelected. The Spanish–American War began on April 25, 1898, due to a series of escalating disputes between the two nations, and ended on December 10, 1898, with the signing of the Treaty of Paris. It resulted in Spain's loss of its control over the remains of its overseas empire. After much of mainland in the Americas had achieved independence, Cubans tried their hand at revolution in 1868–1878, and again in
4420-492: Was replaced by Harry K. Daugherty of Pennsylvania. When Chandler resigned in 1907, Wood took his place as chairman while former Congressman Roswell P. Bishop was added to the Commission. McKinley also named former Congressman William E. Fuller of Iowa as Assistant Attorney General to defend against the claims. Fuller served from 1901 until 1907, when he resigned and was succeeded by former auditor and Congressman William Wallace Brown of Pennsylvania. From 1902 to 1904, Fuller
4488-595: Was the loss of sugar cane fields burned by insurgents or Spanish forces. All but one such claim was denied. Over 150 claims, totalling $ 2,825,200, arose from the destruction of the USS Maine in the harbor of Havana, Cuba on February 15, 1898. Those claims, made by naval officers, seamen or their survivors, were all dismissed. The Commission reasoned that international law would not hold another country liable to American military officers, because such claims are national rather than personal, to be pursued only on behalf of
4556-476: Was the ninth state to ratify, doing so on June 21, 1788, but, as a practical matter, it was decided to delay implementation of the new government until New York and Virginia could be persuaded to ratify. Congress intended that New York City should be the first capital, and that George Washington , of Mount Vernon , Virginia, should be the first President, and both of those things would have been somewhat awkward if either New York or Virginia were not part of
4624-400: Was to be occupied by the United States, which would assume and discharge any obligations of international law by its occupation. Ratification Ratification is a principal 's legal confirmation of an act of its agent . In international law , ratification is the process by which a state declares its consent to be bound to a treaty. In the case of bilateral treaties, ratification
#79920