Misplaced Pages

#451548

55-431: Public economics provides a framework for thinking about whether or not the government should participate in economic markets and if so to what extent it should do so. Microeconomic theory is utilized to assess whether the private market is likely to provide efficient outcomes in the absence of governmental interference; this study involves the analysis of government taxation and expenditures . This subject encompasses

110-423: A democracy , and thus public economics, is aggregating preferences of all individuals in society. To aggregate preferences, however, the decision-making body (i.e. the government) must first ascertain the preferences of the citizens.  We can call this process preference revelation , and in terms of public economics, the objective is to determine the “desired level of public goods of each individual”. This can be

165-412: A wedge between what consumers pay and what producers receive, and the area of this wedge shape is equivalent to the deadweight loss caused by the tax. The area represented by the triangle results from the fact that the intersection of the supply and the demand curves are cut short. The consumer surplus and the producer surplus are also cut short. The loss of such surplus is never recouped and represents

220-506: A "pure public good" is national defense - it is both non-rivalry and non-excludable. Another example, of a pure public good is knowledge. Consider a book. The book itself can be destroyed and thus is excludable. However, the knowledge obtained from the book is far more difficult to destroy and is non-rivalrous and non-excludable. In reality, not all public goods can be classed as 'pure' and most display some degree of excludability and rivalrous. These are known as Impure public goods . To visualize

275-424: A benefit of $ 20, making the total surplus from trade $ 40. However, if the government were to decide to impose a $ 50 tax upon the providers of cleaning services, their trade would no longer benefit them. Amie would not be willing to pay any price above $ 120, and Will would no longer receive a payment that exceeds his opportunity cost. As a result, not only do Amie and Will both give up the deal, but Amie has to live in

330-419: A dirtier house, and Will does not receive his desired income. They have thus lost amount of the surplus that they would have received from their deal, and at the same time, this made each of them worse off to the tune of $ 40 in value. Government revenue is also affected by this tax: since Amie and Will have abandoned the deal, the government also loses any tax revenue that would have resulted from wages. This $ 40

385-516: A host of topics notably market failures such as, public goods , externalities and Imperfect Competition , and the creation and implementation of government policy. Broad methods and topics include: Emphasis is on analytical and scientific methods and normative-ethical analysis, as distinguished from ideology . Examples of topics covered are tax incidence , optimal taxation , and the theory of public goods . The Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classification codes are one way categorizing

440-454: A marginal benefit of between $ 0.07 and $ 0.10 per nail would then buy nails, even though their benefit is less than the real production cost of $ 0.10. The difference between the cost of production and the purchase price then creates the "deadweight loss" to society. A tax has the opposite effect of a subsidy. Whereas a subsidy entices consumers to buy a product that would otherwise be too expensive for them in light of their marginal benefit (price

495-399: A measure of lost economic efficiency when the socially optimal quantity of a good or a service is not produced. Non-optimal production can be caused by monopoly pricing in the case of artificial scarcity , a positive or negative externality , a tax or subsidy , or a binding price ceiling or price floor such as a minimum wage . Assume a market for nails where the cost of each nail

550-495: A more efficient outcome; this Pigouvian tax is the optimal policy prescription for any aggregate, negative externality. In 1960, the economist Ronald H. Coase proposed an alternative scheme whereby negative externalities are dealt with through the appropriate assignment of property rights . This result is known as the Coase theorem . While the origins of cost–benefit analysis can be traced back to Jules Dupuit's classic article "On

605-401: A result, the overall size of the market decreases below the optimum equilibrium. The elasticities of supply and demand determine to what extent the tax distorts the market outcome. As the elasticities of supply and demand increase, so does the deadweight loss resulting from a tax. Taxes may be changed by the government or policymakers at different levels. For instance, when a low tax is levied,

SECTION 10

#1732790315452

660-507: A seminal paper that showed that even when lump-sum taxation is not available, production efficiency is still desirable. This finding is known as the Diamond–Mirrlees efficiency theorem, and it is widely credited with having modernized Ramsey's analysis by considering the problem of income distribution with the problem of raising revenue. Joseph E. Stiglitz and Partha Dasgupta (1971) have criticized this theorem as not being robust on

715-407: A tax on a good causes the size of market for that good to decrease. For example, suppose that Will is a cleaner who is working in the cleaning service company and Amie hired Will to clean her room every week for $ 100. The opportunity cost of Will's time is $ 80, while the value of a clean house to Amie is $ 120. Hence, each of them get same amount of benefit from their deal. Amie and Will each receive

770-499: A very difficult process in practice. In most democratic countries, citizens vote for representatives that best emulate their preferences. This process can be perverted in a number of ways including lobbying , media biases, political advertising, and special interest groups . Another aspect of this public choice paradigm was identified by Anthony Downs in 1957, when he wrote that “parties formulate policies to win elections, rather than win elections to formulate policies”. The argument

825-650: A volume entitled Water Supply: Economics, Technology, and Policy (1960); and a group of Harvard scholars including Robert Dorfman , Stephen Marglin , and others published Design of Water-Resource Systems: New Techniques for Relating Economic Objectives, Engineering Analysis, and Governmental Planning (1962). Public economics involves collective decision making , which can be difficult as individuals in society have different views, including on how much should be spent on public goods. Richer individuals prefer to spend more on both public and private goods than individuals with lower incomes. While both rich and poorer citizens pay

880-492: Is $ 0.10. Demand decreases linearly; there is a high demand for free nails and zero demand for nails at a price per nail of $ 1.10 or higher. The price of $ 0.10 per nail represents the point of economic equilibrium in a competitive market. If market conditions are perfect competition , producers would charge a price of $ 0.10, and every customer whose marginal benefit exceeds $ 0.10 would buy a nail. A monopoly producer of this product would typically charge whatever price will yield

935-421: Is a deadweight loss. In modern economic literature, the most common measure of a taxpayer's loss from a distortionary tax, such as a tax on bicycles, is the equivalent variation , the maximum amount that a taxpayer would be willing to forgo in a lump sum to avoid the tax. The deadweight loss can then be interpreted as the difference between the equivalent variation and the revenue raised by the tax. The difference

990-401: Is attributable to the behavioral changes induced by a distortionary tax that are measured by the substitution effect. However, that is not the only interpretation, and Pigou did not use a lump sum tax as the point of reference to discuss deadweight loss (excess burden). When a tax is levied on buyers, the demand curve shifts downward in accordance with the size of the tax. Similarly, when tax

1045-409: Is large or small. This measures to what extent quantity supplied and quantity demanded respond to changes in price. For instance, when the supply curve is relatively inelastic, quantity supplied responds only minimally to changes in the price. However, when the supply curve is more elastic, quantity supplied responds significantly to changes in price. In other words, when the supply curve is more elastic,

1100-543: Is largely underpinned by addressing market failures that may arise. Public Economics focuses on when and to what degree the government should intervene in the economy to address market failures. Some examples of government intervention are providing pure public goods such as defense, regulating negative externalities such as pollution and addressing imperfect market conditions such as asymmetric information . Pure public goods , or collective consumption goods, exhibit two properties; non-rivalry and non-excludability. Something

1155-452: Is levied on sellers, the supply curve shifts upward by the size of tax. When the tax is imposed, the price paid by buyers increases, and the price received by seller decreases. Therefore, buyers and sellers share the burden of the tax, regardless of how it is imposed. Since a tax places a "wedge" between the price buyers pay and the price sellers get, the quantity sold is reduced below the level that it would be without tax. To put it another way,

SECTION 20

#1732790315452

1210-498: Is lowered to artificially increase demand), a tax dissuades consumers from a purchase (price is increased to artificially lower demand). This excess burden of taxation represents the lost utility for the consumer. A common example of this is the so-called sin tax , a tax levied against goods deemed harmful to society and individuals. For example, "sin taxes" levied against alcohol and tobacco are intended to artificially lower demand for these goods; some would-be users are priced out of

1265-452: Is non-rivaled if one person's consumption of it does not deprive another person, (to a point) a firework display is non-rivaled - since one person watching a firework display does not prevent another person from doing so. Something is non-excludable if its use cannot be limited to a certain group of people. Again, since one cannot prevent people from viewing a firework display it is non-excludable. Due to these constraints, one of few examples of

1320-479: Is plain that divergences between private and social net product of the kinds we have so far been considering cannot, like divergences due to tenancy laws, be mitigated by a modification of the contractual relation between any two contracting parties, because the divergence arises out of a service or disservice to persons other than the contracting parties. It is, however, possible for the State, if it so chooses, to remove

1375-411: Is referred to as the deadweight loss. It causes losses for both buyers and sellers in a market, as well as decreasing government revenues. Taxes cause deadweight losses because they prevent buyers and sellers from realizing some of the gains from trade. In the graph, the deadweight loss can be seen as the shaded area between the supply and demand curves. While the demand curve shows the value of goods to

1430-530: Is that political parties and candidates are motivated primarily by self-interest, and “the income, prestige and power which come from being in office". This can sometimes lead to difficult outcomes and can make it harder to properly aggregate the preferences of the population and can potentially lead to the favouring of the welfare of government officials as opposed to public welfare. Social Choice Theory Social choice theory in economics studies how groups end up making decisions as opposed to individuals. One of

1485-640: Is unlikely that without intervention markets will produce the efficient amount. It therefore, the role of government to regulate the production of public goods so as to create an efficient market equilibrium. Externalities arise when consumption by individuals or production by firms affect the utility or production function of other individuals or firms. Positive externalities are education, public health and others while examples of negative externalities are air pollution, noise pollution , non-vaccination and more. Pigou describes as positive externalities , examples such as resources invested in private parks that improve

1540-712: The Green Book ), which became noteworthy for bringing in the language of welfare economics. In 1958, Otto Eckstein published Water-Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation , and Roland McKean published his Efficiency in Government Through Systems Analysis: With Emphasis on Water Resources Development . The latter book is also considered a classic in the field of operations research . In subsequent years, several other important works appeared: Jack Hirshleifer , James DeHaven, and Jerome W. Milliman published

1595-479: The consumer surplus is considered, it can be shown that the Marshallian deadweight loss is zero if demand is perfectly elastic or supply is perfectly inelastic. However, Hicks analyzed the situation through indifference curves and noted that when the Marshallian demand curve is perfectly inelastic, the policy or economic situation that caused a distortion in relative prices has a substitution effect , i.e.

1650-690: The Measurement of the Utility of Public Works" (1844), much of the subsequent scholarly development occurred in the United States and arose from the challenges of water-resource development. In 1950, the U.S. Federal Interagency River Basin Committee's Subcommittee on Benefits and Costs published a report entitled, Proposed Practices for Economic Analysis of River Basin Projects (also known as

1705-631: The Wikimedia System Administrators, please include the details below. Request from 172.68.168.226 via cp1108 cp1108, Varnish XID 251455419 Upstream caches: cp1108 int Error: 429, Too Many Requests at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:38:35 GMT Deadweight loss In economics , deadweight loss is the loss of societal economic welfare due to production/consumption of a good at a quantity where marginal benefit (to society) does not equal marginal cost (to society) – in other words, there are either goods being produced despite

Public economics - Misplaced Pages Continue

1760-429: The area between the supply and demand curves is larger. Similarly, when the demand curve is relatively inelastic, deadweight loss from the tax is smaller, comparing to more elastic demand curve. A tax results in deadweight loss as it causes buyers and sellers to change their behaviour. Buyers tend to consume less when the tax raises the price. When the tax lowers the price received by sellers, they in turn produce less. As

1815-480: The barriers to entry, firms profit and production objectives and the nature of the product and respective market. Imperfect competition will lead to a social cost and it is the role of government to minimize this cost. Some notable imperfections include: In its essence, the role of government is to address the issues that arise from these market failures and decide the optimal degree of intervention necessary. In 1971, Peter A. Diamond and James A. Mirrlees published

1870-480: The central components of social choice theory is that government actions result from individuals acting out of rational self-interest within the confines of the “rules of the game”. In this sense, the constitution of a given country is a significant factor in what actions a government can take (i.e. limits on deficit spending). One of the pioneers in this field was the American economist James Buchanan, who emphasized

1925-462: The consumer. Furthermore, indirect taxes can be charged based on the unit price of a said commodity or can be calculated based on a percentage of the final retail price. Additionally, indirect taxes can either be collected at one stage of the production and retail process or alternatively can be charged and collected at multiple stages of the overall production process of a commodity. Harberger's triangle, generally attributed to Arnold Harberger , shows

1980-404: The consumers, the supply curve reflects the cost for producers. As the example above explains, when the government imposes a tax upon taxpayers, the tax increases the price paid by buyers to P c {\displaystyle P_{c}} and decreases price received by sellers to P p {\displaystyle P_{p}} . Buyers and sellers (Amie and Will) give up

2035-475: The cost of doing so being larger than the benefit, or additional goods are not being produced despite the fact that the benefits of their production would be larger than the costs. The deadweight loss is the net benefit that is missed out on. While losses to one entity often lead to gains for another, deadweight loss represents the loss that is not regained by anyone else. This loss is therefore attributed to both producers and consumers. Deadweight loss can also be

2090-450: The course of rendering some service, for which payment is made, to a second person B, incidentally also renders services or disservices to other persons (not producers of like services), of such a sort that payment cannot be extracted from the benefited parties or compensation enforced on behalf of the injured parties (Pigou p. 183). In particular, Pigou is known for his advocacy of what are known as corrective taxes, or Pigouvian taxes : It

2145-399: The deadweight loss (as measured on a supply and demand graph) associated with government intervention in a perfect market. Mechanisms for this intervention include price floors , caps , taxes, tariffs, or quotas. It also refers to the deadweight loss created by a government's failure to intervene in a market with externalities . In the case of a government tax, the amount of the tax drives

2200-423: The deadweight loss is also small (compared to a medium or high tax). An important consideration is that the deadweight loss resulting from a tax increases more quickly than the tax itself; the area of the triangle representing the deadweight loss is calculated using the area (square) of its dimension. Where a tax increases linearly, the deadweight loss increases as the square of the tax increase. This means that when

2255-572: The deadweight loss. Some economists like Martin Feldstein maintain that these triangles can seriously affect long-term economic trends by pivoting the trend downwards and causing a magnification of losses in the long run but others like James Tobin have argued that they do not have a huge impact on the economy. The Hicksian (per John Hicks ) and the Marshallian (per Alfred Marshall ) demand function differ about deadweight loss. After

Public economics - Misplaced Pages Continue

2310-399: The deal between them and exit the market. Thus, the quantity sold reduces from Q e {\displaystyle Q_{e}} to Q t {\displaystyle Q_{t}} . The deadweight loss occurs because the tax deters these kinds of beneficial trades in the market. Price elasticities of supply and demand determine whether the deadweight loss from a tax

2365-451: The divergence in any field by "extraordinary encouragements" or "extraordinary restraints" upon investments in that field. The most obvious forms which these encouragements and restraints may assume are, of course, those of bounties and taxes (Pigou p. 192). Pigou suggested that the market failure of externalities can be overcome by the introduction of taxes. The government can intervene in the market, using an emission tax for example to create

2420-444: The greatest profit for themselves, regardless of lost efficiency for the economy as a whole. In this example, the monopoly producer charges $ 0.60 per nail, thus excluding every customer from the market with a marginal benefit less than $ 0.60. The deadweight loss due to monopoly pricing would then be the economic benefit foregone by customers with a marginal benefit of between $ 0.10 and $ 0.60 per nail. The monopolist has "priced them out of

2475-434: The grounds that production efficiency will not necessarily be desirable if certain tax instruments cannot be used. One of the achievements for which the great English economist A.C. Pigou is known, was his work on the divergences between marginal private costs and marginal social costs ( externalities ). In his book, The Economics of Welfare (1932), Pigou describes how these divergences come about: ...one person A, in

2530-488: The market", even though their benefit exceeds the true cost per nail. Conversely, deadweight loss can also arise from consumers buying more of a product than they otherwise would based on their marginal benefit and the cost of production. For example, if in the same nail market the government provided a $ 0.03 subsidy for every nail produced, the subsidy would reduce the market price of each nail to $ 0.07, even though production actually still costs $ 0.10 per nail. Consumers with

2585-493: The market, i.e. total smoking and drinking are reduced. Products such as alcohol and tobacco have historically been highly taxed and incur excise duties which are one of the categories of indirect tax. Indirect tax (VAT), weighs on the consumer, is not a cause of loss of surplus for the producer, but affects consumer utility and leads to deadweight loss for consumers. Indirect taxes are usually paid by large entities such as corporations or manufacturers but are partially shifted towards

2640-445: The public good's characteristic of non-excludability, it would be the inability to build a fence, barrier or wall that would block the good from consumption. In the modern era, digital replication allows several goods to be non-rivalry; since, people from all over the world can access it if you have access to the internet and a device. Due to the two unique properties that public goods exhibit, being non-rivalrous & non-excludable, it

2695-411: The range of economics subjects. There, Public Economics, one of 19 primary classifications, has 8 categories. They are listed below with JEL-code links to corresponding available article-preview links of The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online (2008) and with similar footnote links for each respective sub category if available: The role of government in providing efficient and equitable markets

2750-550: The role of the constitution in setting out the rules of the game. The idea is that without restraints in place, there will be natural incentives for the majority to redistribute income in away from the minority in their favour. There is also the threat of special interest groups influencing elected representatives to act in their favour, at the expense of the public interest, and without appropriate rules in place these temptations will naturally be capitalized on. Microeconomic theory Too Many Requests If you report this error to

2805-445: The same price for private goods, individuals with higher incomes must pay a relatively higher cost when it comes to public goods . We can calculate this additional expenditure as the tax price; “the additional amount an individual must pay when government expenditures increase by one dollar”. With a higher tax price wealthier individuals will desire a lower expenditure on public goods. An important part of collective decision making in

SECTION 50

#1732790315452

2860-420: The same way that a tax causes deadweight loss. When a monopoly, as a "tax collector", charges a price in order to consolidate its power above marginal cost, it drives a "wedge" between the costs born by the consumer and supplier. Imposing this effective tax distorts the market outcome, and the wedge causes a decrease in the quantity sold, below the social optimum . It is important to remember the difference between

2915-399: The size of a tax doubles, the base and height of the triangle double. Thus, doubling the tax increases the deadweight loss by a factor of 4. The varying deadweight loss from a tax also affects the government's total tax revenue. Tax revenue is represented by the area of the rectangle between the supply and demand curves. When a low tax is levied, tax revenue is relatively small. As the size of

2970-464: The surrounding air, and scientific research from which discoveries of high practical utility often grow. Alternatively, he describes negative externalities , such as the factory that destroys a great part of the amenities of neighboring sites. The role of government is to address the negative external effects and societal deadweight loss created from inefficient markets Imperfect competition within markets can take many forms and will often depend on

3025-424: The tax increases, tax revenue expands. However, when a much higher tax is levied, tax revenue eventually decreases. The higher tax reduces the total size of the market; Although taxes are taking a larger slice of the "pie", the total size of the pie is reduced. Just as in the nail example above, beyond a certain point, the market for a good will eventually decrease to zero. A deadweight loss occurs with monopolies in

#451548