Misplaced Pages

#844155

56-538: The Penguin is a wave energy converter (WEC) which was developed by Finnish company Wello Oy between 2008 and 2023. Two full-scale device were constructed, and tested in Scotland and Spain respectively, although both tests ended in difficulties. The concept was a rotating-mass type WEC, with an asymmetric counterweight connected to a generator to harvest energy from the movement of the hull in passing waves. An assessment of wave energy technologies in 2020 rated it at

112-490: A technology readiness level of TRL7, i.e. full-scale prototypical system demonstration in a relevant environment. The device is a floating asymmetric hull containing a rotating mass which drives a generator, without the need for hydraulic systems or a gearbox, and uses similar components to wind turbines. Passing waves cause the hull to move in roll, heave, and pitch, this motion driving the asymmetric counterweight and flywheel, connected to an electrical generator housed inside

168-451: A 300% increase (600 kW) in power generation compared to a buoy without phase adjustments in tests completed in 2024. These devices use multiple floating segments connected to one another. They are oriented perpendicular to incoming waves. A flexing motion is created by swells, and that motion drives hydraulic pumps to generate electricity. The Pelamis Wave Energy Converter is one of the more well-known attenuator concepts, although this

224-511: A device width much smaller than the incoming wavelength λ. Energy is absorbed by radiating a wave with destructive interference to the incoming waves. Buoys use the swells' rise and fall to generate electricity directly via linear generators , generators driven by mechanical linear-to-rotary converters, or hydraulic pumps. Energy extracted from waves may affect the shoreline, implying that sites should remain well offshore. One point absorber design tested at commercial scale by CorPower features

280-557: A further two devices manufactured for the project. The project was to include a smart subsea hub using dry-mate connectors to connect the three WECs onto a single export cable. The location was revised to EMEC, due to the easier nearshore Billia Croo site. WEC1 was redeployed as part of the CEFOW project in March 2017, having been towed back from Falmouth by Green Marine. The second Penguin WEC

336-515: A list of other wave power stations see List of wave power stations . Wave energy converters can be classified based on their working principle as either: The first known patent to extract energy from ocean waves was in 1799, filed in Paris by Pierre-Simon Girard and his son. An early device was constructed around 1910 by Bochaux-Praceique to power his house in Royan , France. It appears that this

392-460: A minor leakage was detected inside the device. It was then moved to the Port of Bilbao , where it had remained for over a year, as of March 2023. Wave power Waves are generated primarily by wind passing over the sea's surface and also by tidal forces, temperature variations, and other factors. As long as the waves propagate slower than the wind speed just above, energy is transferred from

448-454: A negative spring that improves performance and protects the buoy in very large waves. It also has an internal pneumatic cylinder that keeps the buoy at a fixed distance from the seabed regardless of the state of the tide. Under normal operating conditions, the buoy bobs up and down at double the wave amplitude by adjusting the phase of its movements. It rises with a slight delay from the wave, which allows it to extract more energy. The firm claimed

504-487: A plane wave progressing along the x-axis direction. Oscillatory motion is highest at the surface and diminishes exponentially with depth. However, for standing waves ( clapotis ) near a reflecting coast, wave energy is also present as pressure oscillations at great depth, producing microseisms . Pressure fluctuations at greater depth are too small to be interesting for wave power conversion. The behavior of Airy waves offers two interesting regimes: water deeper than half

560-1040: Is a high-order nonlinear phenomenon. It is described using the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations ∂ u → ∂ t + ( u → ⋅ ∇ → ) u → = ν Δ u → + F ext → − ∇ → p ρ ∇ → ⋅ u → = 0 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial {\vec {u}}}{\partial t}}+({\vec {u}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {u}}&=\nu \Delta {\vec {u}}+{\frac {{\vec {F_{\text{ext}}}}-{\vec {\nabla }}p}{\rho }}\\{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {u}}&=0\end{aligned}}} where u → ( t , x , y , z ) {\textstyle {\vec {u}}(t,x,y,z)}

616-403: Is greater than that of a rigid submerged structure, greater wave energy dissipation is expected due to highly deformed shape of the structure. Crest (physics) A Crest point on a wave is the highest point of the wave. A crest is a point on a surface wave where the displacement of the medium is at a maximum. A trough is the opposite of a crest, so the minimum or lowest point of

SECTION 10

#1732779880845

672-418: Is no longer being developed. These devices typically have one end fixed to a structure or the seabed while the other end is free to move. Energy is collected from the relative motion of the body compared to the fixed point. Converters often come in the form of floats, flaps, or membranes. Some designs incorporate parabolic reflectors to focus energy at the point of capture. These systems capture energy from

728-584: Is subject to many technical limitations. These limitations stem from the complex and dynamic nature of ocean waves, which require robust and efficient technology to capture the energy. Challenges include designing and building wave energy devices that can withstand the corrosive effects of saltwater, harsh weather conditions, and extreme wave forces. Additionally, optimizing the performance and efficiency of wave energy converters, such as oscillating water column (OWC) devices, point absorbers, and overtopping devices, requires overcoming engineering complexities related to

784-438: Is the fluid velocity, p {\textstyle p} is the pressure , ρ {\textstyle \rho } the density , ν {\textstyle \nu } the viscosity , and F ext → {\textstyle {\vec {F_{\text{ext}}}}} the net external force on each fluid particle (typically gravity ). Under typical conditions, however,

840-578: The Bernoulli conservation law : ∂ ϕ ∂ t + 1 2 ( ∇ → ϕ ) 2 + 1 ρ p + g z = ( const ) . {\displaystyle {\partial \phi \over \partial t}+{1 \over 2}{\bigl (}{\vec {\nabla }}\phi {\bigr )}^{2}+{1 \over \rho }p+gz=({\text{const}}){\text{.}}} When considering small amplitude waves and motions,

896-460: The Coriolis effect , cabbeling , and temperature and salinity differences. As of 2023, wave power is not widely employed for commercial applications, after a long series of trial projects. Attempts to use this energy began in 1890 or earlier, mainly due to its high power density . Just below the ocean's water surface the wave energy flow, in time-average, is typically five times denser than

952-529: The Laplace equation , ∇ 2 ϕ = 0 . {\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}\phi =0{\text{.}}} In an ideal flow, the viscosity is negligible and the only external force acting on the fluid is the earth gravity F ext → = ( 0 , 0 , − ρ g ) {\displaystyle {\vec {F_{\text{ext}}}}=(0,0,-\rho g)} . In those circumstances,

1008-863: The Navier-Stokes equations reduces to ∂ ∇ → ϕ ∂ t + 1 2 ∇ → ( ∇ → ϕ ) 2 = − 1 ρ ⋅ ∇ → p + 1 ρ ∇ → ( ρ g z ) , {\displaystyle {\partial {\vec {\nabla }}\phi \over \partial t}+{1 \over 2}{\vec {\nabla }}{\bigl (}{\vec {\nabla }}\phi {\bigr )}^{2}=-{1 \over \rho }\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}p+{1 \over \rho }{\vec {\nabla }}{\bigl (}\rho gz{\bigr )},} which integrates (spatially) to

1064-403: The mean energy density per unit area of gravity waves on the water surface is proportional to the wave height squared, according to linear wave theory: where E is the mean wave energy density per unit horizontal area (J/m ), the sum of kinetic and potential energy density per unit horizontal area. The potential energy density is equal to the kinetic energy, both contributing half to

1120-560: The 1950s. The oil crisis in 1973 renewed interest in wave energy. Substantial wave-energy development programmes were launched by governments in several countries, in particular in the UK, Norway and Sweden. Researchers re-examined waves' potential to extract energy, notably Stephen Salter , Johannes Falnes , Kjell Budal , Michael E. McCormick , David Evans , Michael French, Nick Newman , and C. C. Mei . Salter's 1974 invention became known as Salter's duck or nodding duck , officially

1176-615: The Edinburgh Duck. In small-scale tests, the Duck's curved cam -like body can stop 90% of wave motion and can convert 90% of that to electricity, giving 81% efficiency. In the 1980s, several other first-generation prototypes were tested, but as oil prices ebbed, wave-energy funding shrank. Climate change later reenergized the field. The world's first wave energy test facility was established in Orkney , Scotland in 2003 to kick-start

SECTION 20

#1732779880845

1232-414: The behavior of waves in the various regimes: In deep water where the water depth is larger than half the wavelength , the wave energy flux is with P the wave energy flux per unit of wave-crest length, H m0 the significant wave height , T e the wave energy period , ρ the water density and g the acceleration by gravity . The above formula states that wave power is proportional to

1288-992: The boundary constraints (and k {\displaystyle k} ). Specifically, A ( z ) = g H 2 ω cosh ⁡ ( k ( z + h ) ) cosh ⁡ ( k h ) ω = g k tanh ⁡ ( k h ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&A(z)={gH \over 2\omega }{\cosh(k(z+h)) \over \cosh(kh)}\\&\omega =gk\tanh(kh){\text{.}}\end{aligned}}} The surface elevation η {\displaystyle \eta } can then be simply derived as η = − 1 g ∂ ϕ ∂ t = H 2 cos ⁡ ( k x − ω t ) : {\displaystyle \eta =-{1 \over g}{\partial \phi \over \partial t}={H \over 2}\cos(kx-\omega t){\text{:}}}

1344-417: The development of a wave and tidal energy industry. The European Marine Energy Centre(EMEC) has supported the deployment of more wave and tidal energy devices than any other single site. Subsequent to its establishment test facilities occurred also in many other countries around the world, providing services and infrastructure for device testing. The £10 million Saltire prize challenge was to be awarded to

1400-647: The device in October after a two-week tow from Scotland by Saipem . The 44 m long, 0.6 MW device eventually started generating electricity to the Spanish grid in September 2021, having been installed in July. It was proposed to test the device for two years. Saipem were responsible for the installation and the ongoing operations and maintenance. In December 2021, the device was recovered to Vizcaya harbour after

1456-661: The device sank in March 2019. It had survived waves of over 18 m during that time. The Clean Energy From Ocean Waves (CEFOW) project was funded by the European Horizon 2020 programme. The initial aim was to deploy three 1 MW Penguin WECs at the Wave Hub test site in Cornwall, England. The project was coordinated by Finnish utility company Fortum . WEC1 was to be transferred from EMEC to Wave Hub, and joined by

1512-462: The difference in pressure at different locations below a wave to produce a pressure difference within a closed power take-off hydraulic system. This pressure difference is usually used to produce flow, which drives a turbine and electrical generator. Submerged pressure differential converters typically use flexible membranes as the working surface between the water and the power take-off. Membranes are pliant and low mass, which can strengthen coupling with

1568-460: The displacement of commercial and recreational fishermen, and may present navigation hazards. Supporting infrastructure, such as grid connections, must be provided. Commercial WECs have not always been successful. In 2019, for example, Seabased Industries AB in Sweden was liquidated due to "extensive challenges in recent years, both practical and financial". Current wave power generation technology

1624-483: The distance below the free surface. This means that by optimizing depth, protection from extreme loads and access to wave energy can be balanced. Floating in-air converters potentially offer increased reliability because the device is located above the water, which also eases inspection and maintenance. Examples of different concepts of floating in-air converters include: In early 2024, a fully submerged wave energy converter using point absorber-type wave energy technology

1680-422: The dynamic and variable nature of waves. Furthermore, developing effective mooring and anchoring systems to keep wave energy devices in place in the harsh ocean environment, and developing reliable and efficient power take-off mechanisms to convert the captured wave energy into electricity, are also technical challenges in wave power generation. As the wave energy dissipation by a submerged flexible mound breakwater

1736-401: The energy of the waves). A given wind speed has a matching practical limit over which time or distance do not increase wave size. At this limit the waves are said to be "fully developed". In general, larger waves are more powerful but wave power is also determined by wavelength , water density , water depth and acceleration of gravity. Wave energy converters (WECs) are generally categorized by

Wello Penguin - Misplaced Pages Continue

1792-426: The entire water column. Overtopping devices are long structures that use wave velocity to fill a reservoir to a greater water level than the surrounding ocean. The potential energy in the reservoir height is captured with low-head turbines. Devices can be on- or offshore. Submerged pressure differential based converters use flexible (typically reinforced rubber) membranes to extract wave energy. These converters use

1848-425: The first to be able to generate 100 GWh from wave power over a continuous two-year period by 2017 (about 5.7 MW average). The prize was never awarded. A 2017 study by Strathclyde University and Imperial College focused on the failure to develop "market ready" wave energy devices – despite a UK government investment of over £200 million over 15 years. Public bodies have continued and in many countries stepped up

1904-459: The form ϕ = A ( z ) sin ⁡ ( k x − ω t ) , {\displaystyle \phi =A(z)\sin {\!(kx-\omega t)}{\text{,}}} where k {\displaystyle k} determines the wavenumber of the solution and A ( z ) {\displaystyle A(z)} and ω {\displaystyle \omega } are determined by

1960-509: The hull. The counterweight rotates around a vertical axis, nominally parallel to the gravity vector, and can be considered a type of pendulum. The design is such that all moving parts of the WEC are contained within the hull. The hull also has multiple watertight compartments, which were claimed would keep the device afloat. Different sources quote the rated power of the Penguin WEC as 0.5 MW, 0.6 MW, or even 1 MW. Wello Oy

2016-403: The largest offshore sea states have significant wave height of about 15 meters and energy period of about 15 seconds. According to the above formula, such waves carry about 1.7 MW of power across each meter of wavefront. An effective wave power device captures a significant portion of the wave energy flux. As a result, wave heights diminish in the region behind the device. In a sea state ,

2072-421: The method, by location and by the power take-off system. Locations are shoreline, nearshore and offshore. Types of power take-off include: hydraulic ram , elastomeric hose pump , pump-to-shore, hydroelectric turbine , air turbine, and linear electrical generator . The four most common approaches are: This device floats on the surface, held in place by cables connected to the seabed. The point-absorber has

2128-473: The most potential for wave power include the western seaboard of Europe, the northern coast of the UK, and the Pacific coastlines of North and South America, Southern Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. The north and south temperate zones have the best sites for capturing wave power. The prevailing westerlies in these zones blow strongest in winter. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) estimated

2184-771: The movement of waves is described by Airy wave theory , which posits that In situations relevant for energy harvesting from ocean waves these assumptions are usually valid. The first condition implies that the motion can be described by a velocity potential ϕ ( t , x , y , z ) {\textstyle \phi (t,x,y,z)} : ∇ → × u → = 0 → ⇔ u → = ∇ → ϕ , {\displaystyle {{\vec {\nabla }}\times {\vec {u}}={\vec {0}}}\Leftrightarrow {{\vec {u}}={\vec {\nabla }}\phi }{\text{,}}} which must satisfy

2240-408: The output produced by a device), and is equal to: Due to the dispersion relation for waves under gravity, the group velocity depends on the wavelength λ , or equivalently, on the wave period T . Wave height is determined by wind speed, the length of time the wind has been blowing, fetch (the distance over which the wind excites the waves) and by the bathymetry (which can focus or disperse

2296-1364: The quadratic term ( ∇ → ϕ ) 2 {\textstyle \left({\vec {\nabla }}\phi \right)^{2}} can be neglected, giving the linear Bernoulli equation, ∂ ϕ ∂ t + 1 ρ p + g z = ( const ) . {\displaystyle {\partial \phi \over \partial t}+{1 \over \rho }p+gz=({\text{const}}){\text{.}}} and third Airy assumptions then imply ∂ 2 ϕ ∂ t 2 + g ∂ ϕ ∂ z = 0 ( surface ) ∂ ϕ ∂ z = 0 ∂ 2 ϕ ∂ t 2 + ( seabed ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\partial ^{2}\phi \over \partial t^{2}}+g{\partial \phi \over \partial z}=0\quad \quad \quad ({\text{surface}})\\&{\partial \phi \over \partial z}=0{\phantom {{\partial ^{2}\phi \over \partial t^{2}}+{}}}\,\,\quad \quad \quad ({\text{seabed}})\end{aligned}}} These constraints entirely determine sinusoidal wave solutions of

Wello Penguin - Misplaced Pages Continue

2352-403: The research and development funding for wave energy during the 2010s. This includes both EU, US and UK where the annual allocation has typically been in the range 5-50 million USD. Combined with private funding, this has led to a large number of ongoing wave energy projects (see List of wave power projects ). Like most fluid motion, the interaction between ocean waves and energy converters

2408-428: The rise and fall of waves. Oscillating water column devices can be located onshore or offshore. Swells compress air in an internal chamber, forcing air through a turbine to create electricity . Significant noise is produced as air flows through the turbines, potentially affecting nearby birds and marine organisms . Marine life could possibly become trapped or entangled within the air chamber. It draws energy from

2464-480: The theoretical wave energy potential for various countries. It estimated that the US' potential was equivalent to 1170 TWh per year or almost 1/3 of the country's electricity consumption. The Alaska coastline accounted for ~50% of the total. The technical and economical potential will be lower than the given values for the theoretical potential. Environmental impacts must be addressed. Socio-economic challenges include

2520-407: The wave energy density E , as can be expected from the equipartition theorem . The waves propagate on the surface, where crests travel with the phase velocity while the energy is transported horizontally with the group velocity . The mean transport rate of the wave energy through a vertical plane of unit width, parallel to a wave crest, is the energy flux (or wave power, not to be confused with

2576-486: The wave energy period and to the square of the wave height. When the significant wave height is given in metres, and the wave period in seconds, the result is the wave power in kilowatts (kW) per metre of wavefront length. For example, consider moderate ocean swells, in deep water, a few km off a coastline, with a wave height of 3 m and a wave energy period of 8 s. Solving for power produces or 36 kilowatts of power potential per meter of wave crest. In major storms,

2632-465: The wave's energy. Their pliancy allows large changes in the geometry of the working surface, which can be used to tune the converter for specific wave conditions and to protect it from excessive loads in extreme conditions. A submerged converter may be positioned either on the seafloor or in midwater. In both cases, the converter is protected from water impact loads which can occur at the free surface . Wave loads also diminish in non-linear proportion to

2688-455: The wave. When the crests and troughs of two sine waves of equal amplitude and frequency intersect or collide, while being in phase with each other, the result is called constructive interference and the magnitudes double (above and below the line). When in antiphase – 180° out of phase – the result is destructive interference: the resulting wave is the undisturbed line having zero amplitude . This physics -related article

2744-476: The wavelength, as is common in the sea and ocean, and shallow water, with wavelengths larger than about twenty times the water depth. Deep waves are dispersionful : Waves of long wavelengths propagate faster and tend to outpace those with shorter wavelengths. Deep-water group velocity is half the phase velocity . Shallow water waves are dispersionless: group velocity is equal to phase velocity, and wavetrains propagate undisturbed. The following table summarizes

2800-644: The wind energy flow 20 m above the sea surface, and 10 to 30 times denser than the solar energy flow. In 2000 the world's first commercial wave power device, the Islay LIMPET was installed on the coast of Islay in Scotland and connected to the UK national grid . In 2008, the first experimental multi-generator wave farm was opened in Portugal at the Aguçadoura wave park . Both projects have since ended. For

2856-614: The wind to the waves. Air pressure differences between the windward and leeward sides of a wave crest and surface friction from the wind cause shear stress and wave growth. Wave power as a descriptive term is different from tidal power , which seeks to primarily capture the energy of the current caused by the gravitational pull of the Sun and Moon. However, wave power and tidal power are not fundamentally distinct and have significant cross-over in technology and implementation. Other forces can create currents , including breaking waves , wind ,

SECTION 50

#1732779880845

2912-552: Was approved in Spain. The converter includes a buoy that is moored to the bottom and situated below the surface, out of sight of people and away from storm waves. Common environmental concerns associated with marine energy include: The Tethys database provides access to scientific literature and general information on the potential environmental effects of ocean current energy. Wave energy's worldwide theoretical potential has been estimated to be greater than 2 TW. Locations with

2968-721: Was constructed in Tallinn , Estonia, and launched in December 2018. The device was towed across the North Sea to Orkney and moored at Hatston Pier, Kirkwall , however the CEFOW project was cancelled in 2019. The second-generation device was tested at the Biscay Marine Energy Platform (BiMEP) in the Basque Country of northern Spain. Wello announced the testing in September 2020, and hoped to deploy

3024-711: Was founded in 2008, based in Espoo , Finland. In 2014, Fortum acquired a 13.6% minority share in the company. In September 2023, Wello filed for bankruptcy, ceasing development of the wave energy technology after 15 years. The concept was initially tested in wave tanks and at sea between 2008 and 2011, before full-scale sea trials. This first full-scale 0.5 MW device was tested at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney , Scotland between 2011 and 2019. Initial tests commenced in June 2011. It

3080-448: Was the first oscillating water-column type of wave-energy device. From 1855 to 1973 there were 340 patents filed in the UK alone. Modern pursuit of wave energy was pioneered by Yoshio Masuda 's 1940s experiments. He tested various concepts, constructing hundreds of units used to power navigation lights. Among these was the concept of extracting power from the angular motion at the joints of an articulated raft, which Masuda proposed in

3136-539: Was then deployed at the grid-connected Billia Croo in 2012, where it was connected to the grid via an 11 kV subsea cable. Initial test data confirmed the prototype was performing as expected from earlier testing. In April 2015, Wello extended the testing by an additional year. When not being tested, the device was moored at Lyness on the Orkney island of Hoy . The fourth test deployment commenced in March 2017, however after just over two years of continuous operation,

#844155