Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC) is a document describing the metrics of an OAIS -compliant digital repository that developed from work done by the OCLC / RLG Programs and National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) task force initiative.
25-710: The TRAC checklist is an Auditing tool to assess the reliability, commitment and readiness of institutions to assume long-term preservation responsibilities. Currently the repository is under the care of the CRL who are utilizing it in several independent projects. The TRAC checklist was superseded in 2012 by the ISO 16363, known as the Trusted Digital Repository (TDR) Checklist. In 1996 the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems established
50-495: A buy-in concept for membership of the consortia. The consortium acquires and preserves traditional and digital resources for research and teaching and makes them available to member institutions through interlibrary loan and electronic delivery. It also gathers and analyzes data pertaining to the preservation of physical and digital resources, and fosters the sharing of expertise, in order to assist member libraries in maintaining their collections. The Center for Research Libraries
75-548: A center for the study and experience of arts in the field of creative literature - written and oral; visual arts inclusive of architecture, sculpture, painting and graphics to general material culture, photography and film; and performing arts of music, dance and theatre. The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts Trust was constituted and registered in New Delhi on 24 March 1987. The Indira Gandhi National Centre for
100-532: A demand for trustworthiness. The team behind TRAC, led by Robin Dale and Bruce Ambacher, conceived of the trustworthiness of the TRAC-certified repositories as not only providing for well-sourced and well-formatted records and metadata, but transparent managerial procedures and sustainable, long-term structural support. The TRAC creators conceived of four core principles that underpin the checklist's criteria for
125-502: A previous OCLC/RLG project, Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities, and wrote the metrics collectively known as Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC). After the publication of TRAC in 2007, CRL was given the responsibility to carry out test audits using the metrics. TRAC is the basis of the Trusted Digital Repository (TDR) document that was accepted as ISO 16363 in 2012. The TRAC metrics are split into three subject groups: A TRAC audit consists of
150-652: A repository by PTAB was for the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts , completed in January 2018. Beyond these direct successors, TRAC remains among the most influential resource for independent systems of self-audit and assessment. Center for Research Libraries The Center for Research Libraries (also known by its acronym , CRL ) is a consortium of North American universities, colleges, and independent research libraries , based on
175-498: A repository completing the TRAC checklist by citing they fulfill each metric. Metrics can be fulfilled by citing relevant documentation, typical practice, or a combination of both. The TRAC auditors then examine this self-audit. After an on-site visit to discuss any concerns with the provided evidence, the auditors grade the repository on a scale of 1 to 5 for each of the three subject groups. To retain certification, repositories meet with
200-789: A result of their belonging to consortia which are themselves members. There are 250 libraries who are members of the CRL. The Center oversees the International Coalition on Newspapers (est. 1999), an effort to "promote the accessibility and preservation of international newspaper collections". CRL houses large collective collections of newspapers, international doctoral dissertations, government documents and publications, international serials, and Russian monographs. CRL's holdings are in OCLC 's WorldCat . Items are loaned to members at no charge, while non-members are charged for access to
225-528: A task force that developed OAIS , a high-level model for the operation of archives. OAIS was accepted as ISO 14721 in 2002. The original task force stated that an independent auditing method was necessary to certify OAIS-compliance and thus engender trust. However, despite the lack of certified auditors and auditing metrics, repositories were already implementing OAIS concepts and labeling themselves OAIS-compliant. Development of OAIS auditing metrics began in 2003. A joint task force of OCLC/RLG and NARA built upon
250-730: A trusted digital repository (TDR): documentation (evidence), transparency, adequacy and measurability. TRAC expanded upon the previous definition of a TDR that had been developed from the seminal 1996 PDI report that first called for audit and certification of digital repositories. It selectively drew upon models such as Germany's nestor, RLG and OCLC's original TDR description and the Cornell model for Trusted Digital Repository Attributes. According to Elizabeth Yakel , Ixchel Faniel, Adam Kriesberg and Ayoung Yoon, it still overlooked key factors in perceived trustworthiness. They demonstrated that understandings of trustworthiness vary across disciplines, and
275-454: Is not the only certification system to assess the trustworthiness of a digital information system. Other systems include: Because of the time and resources required by the certification process, information professionals have also developed other models for trustworthiness assessment of digital repositories. These include: The CRL lays out and oversees the TRAC metrics. To date, CRL has certified six repositories according to criteria set out in
SECTION 10
#1732791884349300-473: The 2007 TRAC checklist did not address or fully weigh the impact of differences within designated communities in perceptions of trust. Another key conclusion of their study was there is a difference between users' trust in data and their trust in repositories. Further research by Yoon identified a strong correlation between TRAC's first two metrics (organizational infrastructure and digital object management) and user trust of repositories, but little user interest in
325-544: The Arts (IGNCA) is envisioned as an institution dedicated to the study and exploration of various art forms. It emphasizes on the interconnectedness of different art forms within the broader context of human culture, society, and nature. In recognition of the importance of preserving India's diverse art and culture, the IGNCA serves as a valuable resource center for various art forms, including written, oral, and visual materials. Through collaborative efforts with organizations like
350-570: The Center for Research Libraries was awarded a $ 1.45 million grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to support this initiative. The economic downturn of 2007–2008 resulted in reduced library budgets, and with respect to out of control publisher pricing, many universities cut their budgets for maintaining print journal subscriptions. CRL came together to attempt to support continued access to these print journal collections, and one result of this effort
375-628: The TRAC checklist. However, its influence has spread far beyond CRL-certified repositories since TRAC is commonly used as a self-auditing tool, such as at the University of North Texas and Cornell University. TRAC's successor, ISO 16363, also provides the basis of the services provided by the Primary Trustworthy Digital Repository Authorization Body (PTAB), a private sector agency providing outside auditing services. The first certification of
400-475: The auditors within 18 to 24 months for a consultation. After 4 years, the certification expires and the repository must begin a new audit. The concept of trust underpins the relationship between repositories and their users. The development of the OAIS model (Open Archival Information System) was accompanied by a demand for assurance that repositories claiming to use OAIS actually adhere to those standards; that is,
425-614: The collections. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts ( IGNCA ), New Delhi is a premier government-funded arts organization in India. It is an autonomous institute under the Union Ministry of Culture . The Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts was launched on 19 November 1985 by Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi . IGNCA is envisioned as
450-455: The databases evaluated are digital versions of collections that CRL holds in microform or in print, and thus offer the prospect of replacing microfilm or hard copy delivery with electronic access." CRL is governed by a Board of Directors made up of library directors from member institutions. The member libraries contribute a percentage of their own collection-development budget to CRL as an annual membership fee. Many libraries are CRL members as
475-453: The internet and current technology meant that the relevancy of a physical repository became less important. Concerns shifted to the impact of globalization initiatives such as the financial industry, policy sector research, development of advanced information and text processing software applications to serve the for-profit research industry. This new strategy had CRL break down their areas of resources into three main areas of service: In 2008,
500-938: The successful template for those area studies programs to the broader sphere of humanities and social science resources. Like the Area Microform and Global Resources projects, GRF activities leverage for the common good the formidable pool of expertise and knowledge on traditional and digital collections that exists among CRL's extensive community." Ultimately, the GRF combines open access online resources such as data and analysis with limited-participation in both virtual and in-person roundtable discussions. These discussions include publication of audits of repositories like Portico, and examination of databases of primary source collections in areas of interest, which in turn provide critical information by which CRL libraries can base their acquisition policy and collection decisions. "In some instances
525-415: The third metric (technical infrastructure and security). Drawing on previous work on TRAC, Yoon identified a "lack of deception" as the key feature in establishing trust in both sources and repositories. In 2012, ISO 16363 expanded upon and superseded the 2007 TRAC checklist by adding more detailed criteria, as well as providing a new standard for bodies seeking to be certified to perform certification. TRAC
SECTION 20
#1732791884349550-633: Was founded in 1949, as the Midwest Inter-Library Center (MILC). The traditional role of CRL was as an aggregator of tangible collection materials; however, this focus has been updated in the digital age into the CRL's current role as a facilitator of collection development, digitization, and licensing collections by individual libraries and interest groups. This transformation required CRL to adopt new funding models from partnerships with key organizations, and use of current technology to support community outreach and engagement. Funding
575-650: Was originally built to manage a collective collection that no one university could maintain, and contents included foreign newspapers, government documents, microform archives, historic journals, foreign dissertations, and other material identified as critical to research. Since 2013, CRL has hosted NERL, originally known as the NorthEast Research Libraries Consortium, an academic library consortium that negotiates licenses for online products on behalf of 28 member academic research libraries and 80 affiliates. The introduction of
600-625: Was provided by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation , the National Science Foundation , and the Institute of Museum and Library Services . When the Center for Research Libraries was founded in 1949, it was a product of the post- World War II era, and focused specifically on print materials. It was established by ten midwestern universities, and was established to support humanities studies and social science research efforts. CRL
625-667: Was the Print Archives Preservation Registry (PAPR). PAPR is part of a larger program entitled the Global Resources Forum (GRF) that supports library and consortia decision-making on collection management and investment. "One of several components of a larger CRL program of support for consortia decision-making on collection management and investment, the Global Resources Forum. The Global Resources Forum (GRF) evolved from CRL's longstanding cooperative collection-building efforts, and applies
#348651