Misplaced Pages

#148851

28-662: The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (1978) is a United States environmental law that amended the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to establish health and environmental standards for the stabilization, restoration , and disposal of uranium mill waste . Title 1 of the Act required the EPA to set environmental protection standards consistent with

56-541: A 1962 book by Rachel Carson , is frequently credited as launching the environmental movement in the United States. The book documented the effects of pesticides , especially DDT , on birds and other wildlife. Among the most significant environmental disasters of the 1960s was the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill , which generated considerable public outrage as Congress was considering several major pieces of environmental legislation. ( See Environmental movement in

84-553: A leading role in American water law , in the doctrines of riparian rights and prior appropriation . In the United States, responsibilities for the administration of environmental laws are divided between numerous federal and state agencies with varying, overlapping, and sometimes conflicting missions. EPA is the most well-known federal agency, with jurisdiction over many of the country's national air, water and waste and hazardous substance programs. Other federal agencies, such as

112-465: A number of landmark environmental regulatory regimes, but many other federal laws are equally important, if less comprehensive. Concurrently, the legislatures of the fifty states have passed innumerable comparable sets of laws. These state and federal systems are foliated with layer upon layer of administrative regulation. Meanwhile, the US judicial system reviews not only the legislative enactments, but also

140-539: A permit to fill non-federal wetlands might require a permit from a single state agency, larger and more complex endeavors—for example, the construction of a coal-fired power plant —might require approvals from numerous federal and state agencies. In the United States, violations of environmental laws are generally civil offenses , resulting in monetary penalties and, perhaps, civil sanctions such as injunction . Many environmental laws also provide for criminal penalties for egregious violations. Some federal laws, such as

168-800: Is administered by the United States Army Corps of Engineers . However, authority to administer Section 9 of the Act, applying to bridges and causeways in, over or on navigable waters of the U.S. (superseded by the General Bridge Act of 1946 , as amended), was removed from the Corps of Engineers and redelegated to the U.S. Coast Guard under the provisions of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. The Corps owns and operates many bridges and may not regulate themselves due to conflict of interest. The Jacksonville District of

196-521: Is limited to " waters of the United States ". In many cases federal laws allow for more stringent regulation by states, and of transfer of certain federally mandated responsibilities from federal to state control. US state governments, therefore, administering state law adopted under state police powers or federal law by delegation, uniformly include environmental agencies. The extent to which state environmental laws are based on or depart from federal law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Thus, while

224-521: Is one such agency. Others, such as the United States Park Police , carry out more traditional law enforcement activities. Adjudicatory proceedings for environmental violations are often handled by the agencies themselves under the structures of administrative law . In some cases, appeals are also handled internally (for example, EPA's Environmental Appeals Board). Generally, final agency determinations may subsequently be appealed to

252-583: The Endangered Species Act ), and, much more recently, Massachusetts v. EPA (requiring EPA to reconsider regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act ) have had policy impacts far beyond the facts of the particular case. The common law of tort is an important tool for the resolution of environmental disputes that fall beyond the confines of regulated activity. Prior to the modern proliferation of environmental regulation,

280-533: The Endangered Species Act , National Forest Management Act , and Coastal Zone Management Act . The National Environmental Policy Act , governing environmental impact review in actions undertaken or approved by the U.S. federal government, may implicate all of these areas. Federalism in the United States has played a role in the shape of national environmental legislation. Many federal environmental laws employ cooperative federalism mechanisms - many federal regulatory programs are administered in coordination with

308-611: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act , including groundwater protection limits; the Department of Energy to implement EPA standards and provide perpetual care for some sites; and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to review cleanups and license sites to states or the DOE for perpetual care. Title 1 established a uranium mill remedial action program jointly funded by the federal government and

SECTION 10

#1732790695149

336-596: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service pursue primarily conservation missions, while still others, such as the United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management , tend to focus more on beneficial use of natural resources. Federal agencies operate within the limits of federal jurisdiction . For example, EPA's jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act

364-472: The U.S. states . Furthermore, the states generally have enacted their own laws to cover areas not preempted by federal law. This includes areas where Congress had acted in limited fashion (e.g., state site cleanup laws to handle sites outside Superfund ) and where Congress has left regulation primarily to the states (e.g., water resources law ). The history of environmental law in the US can be traced back to early roots in common law doctrines, for example,

392-529: The United States . The Act makes it a misdemeanor to discharge refuse matter of any kind into the navigable waters , or tributaries thereof, of the United States without a permit; this specific provision is known as the Refuse Act . The Act also makes it a misdemeanor to excavate, fill, or alter the course, condition, or capacity of any port , harbor , channel , or other areas within the reach of

420-496: The Vermont Law School (tie) in the top five for environmental law programs. Several law schools host legal clinics that focus on environmental law, providing students with an opportunity to learn about environmental law in the context of real world disputes involving actual clients. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 The Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 is the oldest federal environmental law in

448-525: The "Agreement State" program, established in 1959, in which the Atomic Energy Commission gave regulatory authority of certain nuclear materials to states. It was unclear how much regulatory power Agreement states had, and as a result these states took little regulatory action. Sites that were owned by the federal government, the NRC, or Agreement states were ineligible for remedial action under

476-412: The Act without a permit . The Act also made it illegal to dam navigable streams without a license (or permit) from Congress . This provision was included for the purposes of hydroelectric generation, at a time when the electric utility industry was expanding rapidly. Although many activities covered by the Act are regulated under the Clean Water Act , the 1899 Act retains independent vitality. The Act

504-520: The Clean Water Act, also allow a U.S. citizen to file a lawsuit against a violator, if the government has failed to take enforcement action. Environmental agencies often include separate enforcement offices, with duties including monitoring permitted activities, performing compliance inspections, issuing citations and prosecuting wrongdoing (civilly or criminally, depending on the violation). EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

532-850: The UMTRCA, as they were instead the responsibility of the government agencies or states who owned them. United States environmental law The United States Congress has enacted federal statutes intended to address pollution control and remediation, including for example the Clean Air Act ( air pollution ), the Clean Water Act ( water pollution ), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund) (contaminated site cleanup). There are also federal laws governing natural resources use and biodiversity which are strongly influenced by environmental principles, including

560-632: The United States .) One lawsuit that has been widely recognized as one of the earliest environmental cases is Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission , decided in 1965 by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals , prior to passage of the major federal environmental statutes. The case helped halt the construction of a power plant on Storm King Mountain in New York State. The case has been described as giving birth to environmental litigation and helping create

588-527: The administrative decisions of the many agencies dealing with environmental issues. Where the statutes and regulations end, the common law begins. Consistent with the federal statutes that they administer, US federal agencies promulgate regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations that fill out the broad programs enacted by Congress. Primary among these is Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations , containing

SECTION 20

#1732790695149

616-765: The appropriate court. As environmental law becomes more widespread in the United States, another form of enforcement is emerging. Economic sanctions and incentives are the next wave of enforcement techniques. However, other researchers believe that the best way to enforce environmental regulation is to enforce non-environmental laws that can also have positive results for the environment. Some researchers have found that this leads to better environmental performance with bipartisan support In 2023, U.S. News & World Report ranked The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University , Northwestern School of Law of Lewis and Clark College , UC Berkeley School of Law , New York University School of Law (tie), UCLA School of Law (tie), and

644-500: The development of environmental law in the United States, in many cases resolving significant controversy regarding the application of federal environmental laws in favor of environmental interests. The decisions of the Supreme Court in cases such as Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (broadly reading the procedural requirements of NEPA), Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill (broadly reading

672-434: The doctrines of nuisance (public or private), trespass , negligence , and strict liability apportioned harm and assigned liability for activities that today would be considered pollution and likely governed by regulatory regimes. These doctrines remain relevant, and most recently have been used by plaintiffs seeking to impose liability for the consequences of global climate change. The common law also continues to play

700-541: The law of nuisance and the public trust doctrine . The first environmental statute was the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 , which has been largely superseded by the Clean Water Act (CWA). However, most current major environmental statutes, such as the federal statutes listed above, were passed in the time spanning the late 1960s through the early 1980s. Prior to the passage of these statutes, most federal environmental laws were not nearly as comprehensive. Silent Spring ,

728-576: The legal doctrine of standing to bring environmental claims. The Scenic Hudson case also is said to have helped inspire the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the creation of such environmental advocacy groups as the Natural Resources Defense Council . Laws from every stratum of the laws of the United States pertain to environmental issues. Congress has passed

756-418: The regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Other important CFR sections include Title 10 (energy), Title 18 (Conservation of Power and Water Resources), Title 21 (Food and Drugs), Title 33 (Navigable Waters), Title 36 (Parks, Forests and Public Property), Title 43 (Public Lands: Interior) and Title 50 (Wildlife and Fisheries). The federal and state judiciaries have played an important role in

784-505: The state. Title 1 of the Act also designated 22 inactive uranium mill sites for remediation , resulting in the containment of 40 million cubic yards of low-level radioactive material in UMTRCA Title 1 holding cells. The act was written in the "hectic final days" of the 95th U.S. Congress and contained multiple errors that made it "a nightmare of statutory construction ," and required remedial legislation to fix. The act perpetuated

#148851