33-606: Jiva is the immortal essence of a living organism in Hinduism and Jainism. Jiva , Jīva , or Jiwa may also refer to: Jiva Jiva ( Sanskrit : जीव , IAST : jīva ), also referred as Jivātman , is a living being or any entity imbued with a life force in Hinduism and Jainism . The word itself originates from the Sanskrit verb-root jīv , which translates as 'to breathe' or 'to live'. The jiva , as
66-492: A duality of five kinds, the most fundamental of which is that between jivas and Ishvara . A soul or jiva is differentiated from God or Ishvara due to the jiva’s dependence on Ishvara ; this state is an indication of eternal, ontological distinction. Unique to this school is the idea of a hierarchy of souls, evocative of predestination . Within the system, some souls are inherently and eternally destined for liberation, others for hell and still others for migration through
99-621: A metaphysical entity, has been described in various scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads . Each subschool of Vedanta describes the role of the jiva with the other metaphysical entities in varying capacities. The closest translation into English and abrahamic philosophies would be the soul . A common metaphysical entity discussed in the scriptures (such as the Bhagavad Gita, Upanishad and Vachanamrut) in
132-412: A state of bliss and happiness. Bhedabheda Bhedābheda is more a tradition than a sub-school of Vedānta , which teaches that the individual self ( jīvātman ) is both different and not different from the ultimate reality known as Brahman. Bhedābheda ( Devanagari : भेदाभेद ) is a Sanskrit word meaning "difference and non-difference ". The principal author of Bhedabheda is Bhāskara who
165-614: Is a different self in each body, each one an inherent part of the Lord". The Akshar-Purushottam Darshan , the teachings of Swaminarayan as interpreted by the BAPS , centers around the existence of five eternal realities, as stated in two of Swaminarayan’s sermons documented in the Vachanamrut , Gadhada 1.7 and Gadhada 3.10: Puruṣottama Bhagavān , Akṣarabrahman , māyā , īśvara and jīva – these five entities are eternal. From all
198-680: Is a similar dualism between the jiva and ajiva in Jainism. Both the jiva and puruṣa are also said to be numerous. The Samkhyakarika states: Since birth, death, and the instruments of life are allotted severally; since occupations are not at once universal; and since qualities affect variously; multitude of souls (puruṣa) is demonstrated Relatedly, each jiva is, just like a puruṣa in Samkhya, qualitatively distinct from another jiva so that each can be termed their "own self". The Nyaya school of philosophy also shares similarities to
231-461: Is an inherent part of indwelling Lord. The philosophy proposed by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepts that the jiva is aware and possesses distinct qualities. It is neither god, human or animal, and is separate from the senses and mind. It is unchanging, possessing consciousness and bliss, and pervades the body. Whilst the body and mind require a jiva to function, the jiva's awareness and existence is not dependant on anything. Goswami also describes that "there
264-458: Is commonly depicted through an analogy: just as rays originate from the sun but are spatio-temporally distinct from it, so too jivas are parts of the whole that is Brahman. Another analogy given is that of sparks emitted from a fire. The sparks, composed of same substance as fire, are non-different ( abheda ) from the fire. They are also different ( bheda ), located in different place from the fire from which they originated. Yet another analogy given
297-562: Is distinguished from the positions of two other major schools of Vedānta. The Advaita (Non-dual) Vedānta that claims that the individual self is completely identical to Brahman, and the Dvaita (Dualist) Vedānta (13th century) that teaches complete difference between the individual self and Brahman. There are multiple ways that the difference and non-difference is interpreted in Bhedābheda traditions. Bhaskara and Nimbarka mark two ends on
330-530: Is divine, pure, and spiritual. The jiva's ultimate purpose is to engage in a loving devotion to Krishna (Supreme Brahman), and liberation is attained through divine grace and the acceptance of the jiva's loving surrender to Krishna. Vallabhacharya uses an analogy between fire and its sparks, where jivas are sparks emerging from God's fire, tiny yet sharing the same essence. The Acintya Bheda Abheda , proposed by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, maintains that jiva and Brahman are same ( abheda ) and different ( bheda ) and
363-434: Is not just the end of transmigrations of the jiva (re-births), but also a sense of bliss and joy found in the contemplation of god and living a life of devotion. This involves singing his praise and dwelling on his characteristics. The Shuddadvaita Darshan , proposed by Vallabhacharya , has a concept of "nitya-sambandha" which means eternal relationship between jiva and Brahman (Parabrahman). The jiva's inherent nature
SECTION 10
#1732779812876396-465: Is not slain by the slaying of the body." बालाग्रशतभागस्य शतधा कल्पितस्य च । भागो जीवः स विज्ञेयः स चानन्त्याय कल्पते ॥ ९ ॥ [1] The Shvetashvatara Upanishad compares the jiva and the Paramatma to two friendly birds sitting on the same tree: समाने वृक्षे पुरुषो निमग्नोऽनीशया शोचति मुह्यमानः । जुष्टं यदा पश्यत्यन्यमीशमस्य महिमानमिति वीतशोकः ॥ ७ ॥ [2] Swaminarayan has described the nature of
429-520: Is of ocean and its waves, which shows that even though the bhedabheda darshan entails that Brahman has parts and jivas are part of Brahman, this does not mean jivas lessen its perfection, just as the waves of the ocean do not lessen the amount of water present in the ocean. Founded by Madhva , the Dvaita (dualist) Darshan rejects the Advaita (non-dualist) notion of one ultimate reality. It propounds
462-538: Is that between jivas , or souls, and Brahman. Understood through the paradigm of relative reality, jivas are cloaked by maya—avidya , or ignorance—a state in which they are not able to realize their oneness with Brahman. Within Advaita philosophy, the nature of the Jiva is described using three theories or metaphors: Pratibimba - vāda (theory of reflection) , Avaccheda-vāda (theory of limitation) , and Ābhāsa-vāda (theory of appearance). According to Pratibimba-vāda ,
495-530: Is that the individual self ( jīvātman ) is both different and not different from the ultimate reality known as Brahman. Each thinker within the Bhedābheda Vedānta tradition has their own particular understanding of the precise meanings of the philosophical terms "difference" and "non-difference." Bhedābheda Vedāntic ideas can be traced to some of the very oldest Vedāntic texts, including quite possibly Bādarāyaṇa's Brahma Sūtra (c. 4th century CE). Bhedābheda
528-447: Is when a jiva acquires a new body, and death is when it departs from its body. Just as one abandons one's old clothes and wears new ones, the jiva renounces its old body and acquires a new one. There are important similarities between the jiva and the puruṣa of Samkhya - Yoga . The most visible similarity is that both the jiva and puruṣa are part of a dualism. Just like Samkhya's dualism between puruṣa and prakriti , there
561-554: The Prasthantrayi . The Advaita (non-dualist) Darshan posits the existence of only one entity, Brahman . It considers all distinctions ultimately false since differentiation requires more than one entity. Those distinctions empirically perceived, along with those expounded in the Prasthanatrayi , are accounted for within this school by the recognition of a relative reality ( vyavaharik satta). One such distinction
594-401: The jiva as a limitation ( upadhi ) of the atman . It is limited and appears to be separated from other selves because of ignorance. The Bhedhabheda Darshan , founded by Nimbark, maintains that jivas are at once distinct and part of Brahman, a middle ground of sorts between the extremes of Advaita, utter oneness, and Dvaita, utter distinctness. This notion of difference yet non-difference
627-422: The jiva consists of a reflection of the atman , and the mirror on which the reflection occurs is ignorance ( avidya ). This metaphor clarifies that the atman and jiva are not distinct, even though they appear to be so, just as one's reflection in the mirror appears to be distinct from oneself but is actually identical with one. Avaccheda-vāda denies that consciousness can be reflected, and instead understands
660-492: The jiva in his discourse in Vachanamrut Jetalpur 2: The jiva is uncuttable, unpiercable, immortal, formed of consciousness, and the size of an atom. You may also ask, 'Where does the jiva reside?' Well, it resides within the space of the heart, and while staying there, it performs different functions. From there, when it wants to see, it does so through the eyes; when it wants to hear sounds, it does so through
693-549: The Vedanta schools, in that there is the belief that the jiva is eternal, experiences the fruits of its good and bad deeds ( karma ), and undergoes reincarnation . However unlike other schools where the jiva is the source of consciousness, in the Nyaya school, consciousness is an attribute that only occurs when a jiva associates with a mind. Furthermore, Nyaya schools believe liberation to be a complete absence of suffering, rather than
SECTION 20
#1732779812876726-564: The Vedas, Purāṇas, Itihāsa and Smṛti scriptures, I have gleaned the principle that jīva , māyā , īśvara , Brahman and Parameśvara are all eternal. The jiva is defined as a distinct, individual soul, i.e., a finite sentient being. Jivas are bound by maya , which hides their true self, which is characterized by eternal existence, consciousness and bliss. There are an infinite number of jivas . They are extremely subtle, indivisible, unpierceable, ageless and immortal. While residing within
759-557: The cycle of birth and death. It is in this cycle where jivas have the opportunity to perform positive or negative deeds ( karmas ), and make spiritual efforts to break free of it, known as liberation ( moksha ). The Vishishtadvaita Darshan , proposed by Ramanuja , maintains an ontological distinction between jivas and God. However, unlike in the Dvaita Darshan, the distinction is qualified. The jiva still remains dependent on God for its qualities and volition. Ramanuja uses
792-411: The doctrine of the body and the soul ( sarira and sariri ) to explain the relationship between God and the jivas . The jivas constitutes the body of God, and God is the soul of the jivas . Using this doctrine, Ramanuja is able to maintain an ontological distinction between God and the jivas , while still demonstrating their qualified non-duality. Vishishtadvaita holds, like other darshanas , that
825-404: The ears; it smells all types of smells through the nose; it tastes through the tongue; and through the skin, it experiences the pleasures of all sensations. In addition, it thinks through the mind, contemplates through the citta [one of the inner faculties] and forms convictions through the intelligence [buddhi]. In this manner, through the ten senses and the four inner faculties, it perceives all of
858-401: The heart, a jiva pervades the entire body by its capacity to know ( gnānshakti ), making it animate. It is the form of knowledge ( gnānswarūp ) as well as the knower ( gnātā ). The jiva is the performer of virtuous and immoral actions ( karmas ) and experiences the fruits of these actions. It has been eternally bound by maya ; as a result, it roams within the cycle of birth and death . Birth
891-485: The jiva, as an atman, to the relationship between a lamp and the light it emits: The one luminous substance exists as light and as the possessor of light....possesses luminosity, because it illuminates both its own form and that of others. But it behaves as a quality of that luminous substance....In this same way, the self has the form of consciousness but also has the quality of consciousness Unlike other schools, Vishishtadvaita philosophy proposes that moksha (liberation)
924-600: The relationship is inconceivable in thought ( acintya ). Jiva Goswami , one of the main scholars in the Caitanya Vaisnava school, offers a definition of the self that shares many characteristics of other schools but is distinctly aligned with the Bhedhabhedha position that the jiva is a part of Brahman: Furthermore, it has the intrinsic characteristics of being an apprehender, agent and qualitative experiencer, and by its own nature and at all times it
957-409: The self is chetan , a conscious being that is made up of consciousness. The school offers many rebuttals against the Advaita conception, one of which addresses the way in which Advaita's jiva , Brahman, may be in a state of ignorance. The Vishishtadvaita Darshan argues that if ignorance is not a quality of Brahman, then the notion of non-duality is contradicted. Ramanuja compares the consciousness of
990-544: The sense-objects [i.e objects of sensorial perception'. It pervades the entire body from head to toe, yet is distinct from it. Such is the nature of the jiva. Vedanta is one of the six schools ( darshanam ) of Hindu philosophy, and it contains subschools that have derived their beliefs from the Upanishads , the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita . The aforementioned three scriptures are commonly referred to as
1023-423: The seven schools of Vedanta is the jiva or atman : the soul or self. Chapter 2 of the Bhagavad Gita contains verses describing the jiva . For example, the jiva is described as eternal and indestructible in chapter 2, verse 20: न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचिन् नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूयः । अजो नित्यः शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे "The soul is unborn and eternal, everlasting and primeval. It
Jiva (disambiguation) - Misplaced Pages Continue
1056-583: The spectrum in this tradition. Bhaskara believes that the non-difference aspect is more real because he believes that Brahman is in its natural state without difference. Nimbarka believes that Brahman's essential nature includes equally real states of difference and non-difference. Bhedābheda ideas had an enormous influence on the devotional ( bhakti ) schools of India's medieval period. Among medieval Bhedābheda thinkers are: Other major names are Rāmānuja 's teacher Yādavaprakāśa , and Vijñānabhikṣu (16th century). This Hindu philosophy –related article
1089-426: Was either Shankara's contemporary or lived shortly after Shankara. Bhedabheda, is a Hindu philosophical tradition, primarily developed in the 7th Century CE, with key contributions from Bhāskara and Nimbarka. This school states that the individual soul (jiva) and the ultimate reality (Brahman) are simultaneously distinct and non-distinct. The characteristic position of all the different Bhedābheda Vedānta schools
#875124