Canada (AG) v Ontario (AG) , also known as In re the Regulation and Control of Aeronautics in Canada and the Aeronautics Reference , is a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on the interpretation of the Canadian Constitution. Lord Sankey decided in the case that the federal government has the authority to govern the subject of aeronautics, including licensing of pilots, aircraft, and commercial services and regulations for navigation and safety.
5-717: As part of the negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference , the Paris Convention of 1919 set up an international framework for regulation of aerial navigation. It was drawn up and signed by all parties, including Canada. It was ratified on behalf of the British Empire in 1922, and the Parliament of Canada subsequently passed legislation on the matter. In a federal-provincial conference in 1927, questions were raised as to whether there really
10-513: A new international convention in 1944 that was not a treaty of the British Empire, it was held in Johannesson v West St. Paul that, in accordance with Ontario v Canada Temperance Federation , the field continued to be within federal jurisdiction under the power relating to peace, order and good government , as by then it had attained a national dimension. Paris Peace Conference, 1919 Too Many Requests If you report this error to
15-472: The central Government those high functions and almost sovereign powers to which uniformity of legislation might be secured on all questions which were of common concern to all the Provinces as members of a constituent whole." The division of responsibilities between federal and provincial jurisdictions was summarized as follows by Lord Sankey : Although the underlying Convention was denounced and replaced by
20-611: The other questions would be sufficient to answer it. The SCC ruling was reversed on appeal, and the Privy Council answered "Yes" with respect to all three questions. The relevant clauses in the British North America, 1867 that were held to cover the entire field of aeronautics were: The Privy Council also observed that the real object of the British North America Act, 1867 was to "give
25-516: Was federal jurisdiction to regulate this field. The following reference questions were posed to the Supreme Court of Canada : In its ruling, the SCC answered the questions as follows: The Attorney General of Canada appealed the ruling with respect to Questions 1, 3 and 4. Question 2 was not formally appealed because of its political nature, but it was conceded in argument that the ruling on
#507492