Misplaced Pages

Dichotomy

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

In mathematics , a partition of a set is a grouping of its elements into non-empty subsets , in such a way that every element is included in exactly one subset.

#891108

22-440: A dichotomy / d aɪ ˈ k ɒ t ə m i / is a partition of a whole (or a set) into two parts (subsets). In other words, this couple of parts must be If there is a concept A, and it is split into parts B and not-B, then the parts form a dichotomy: they are mutually exclusive, since no part of B is contained in not-B and vice versa, and they are jointly exhaustive, since they cover all of A, and together again give A. Such

44-451: A {\displaystyle a} . Every partition P {\displaystyle P} may be identified with an equivalence relation on X {\displaystyle X} , namely the relation ∼ P {\displaystyle \sim _{\!P}} such that for any a , b ∈ X {\displaystyle a,b\in X} we have

66-402: A ∼ P b {\displaystyle a\sim _{\!P}b} if and only if a ∈ [ b ] {\displaystyle a\in [b]} (equivalently, if and only if b ∈ [ a ] {\displaystyle b\in [a]} ). The notation ∼ P {\displaystyle \sim _{\!P}} evokes the idea that

88-406: A block of α and a block of ρ , except for the empty set. In other words, a block of α ∧ ρ {\displaystyle \alpha \wedge \rho } is the intersection of a block of α and a block of ρ that are not disjoint from each other. To define the join α ∨ ρ {\displaystyle \alpha \vee \rho } , form

110-459: A finite set corresponds to a matroid in which the base set of the matroid consists of the atoms of the lattice, namely, the partitions with n − 2 {\displaystyle n-2} singleton sets and one two-element set. These atomic partitions correspond one-for-one with the edges of a complete graph . The matroid closure of a set of atomic partitions is the finest common coarsening of them all; in graph-theoretic terms, it

132-457: A finite set) it is a geometric and supersolvable lattice. The partition lattice of a 4-element set has 15 elements and is depicted in the Hasse diagram on the left. The meet and join of partitions α and ρ are defined as follows. The meet α ∧ ρ {\displaystyle \alpha \wedge \rho } is the partition whose blocks are the intersections of

154-459: A partition is also frequently called a bipartition. The two parts thus formed are complements . In logic , the partitions are opposites if there exists a proposition such that it holds over one and not the other. Treating continuous variables or multi categorical variables as binary variables is called dichotomization . The discretization error inherent in dichotomization is temporarily ignored for modeling purposes. The term dichotomy

176-491: A polygon (whose vertices are the elements of the block). The partition is then noncrossing if and only if these polygons do not intersect. The lattice of noncrossing partitions of a finite set forms a subset of the lattice of all partitions, but not a sublattice, since the join operations of the two lattices do not agree. The noncrossing partition lattice has taken on importance because of its role in free probability theory. The total number of partitions of an n -element set

198-412: A relation on the blocks A of α and the blocks B of ρ by A ~ B if A and B are not disjoint. Then α ∨ ρ {\displaystyle \alpha \vee \rho } is the partition in which each block C is the union of a family of blocks connected by this relation. Based on the equivalence between geometric lattices and matroids , this lattice of partitions of

220-400: A set X is a set of non-empty subsets of X such that every element x in X is in exactly one of these subsets (i.e., the subsets are nonempty mutually disjoint sets ). Equivalently, a family of sets P is a partition of X if and only if all of the following conditions hold: The sets in P {\displaystyle P} are called the blocks , parts , or cells , of

242-418: A set X the existence of a subset of X containing exactly one element from each part of the partition. This implies that given an equivalence relation on a set one can select a canonical representative element from every equivalence class. A partition α of a set X is a refinement of a partition ρ of X —and we say that α is finer than ρ and that ρ is coarser than α —if every element of α

SECTION 10

#1732790794892

264-433: Is noncrossing if it has the following property: If four elements a , b , c and d of N having a < b < c < d satisfy a ~ c and b ~ d , then a ~ b ~ c ~ d . The name comes from the following equivalent definition: Imagine the elements 1, 2, ..., n of N drawn as the n vertices of a regular n -gon (in counterclockwise order). A partition can then be visualized by drawing each block as

286-426: Is finite . For any equivalence relation on a set X , the set of its equivalence classes is a partition of X . Conversely, from any partition P of X , we can define an equivalence relation on X by setting x ~ y precisely when x and y are in the same part in P . Thus the notions of equivalence relation and partition are essentially equivalent. The axiom of choice guarantees for any partition of

308-445: Is a subset of some element of ρ . Informally, this means that α is a further fragmentation of ρ . In that case, it is written that α ≤ ρ . This "finer-than" relation on the set of partitions of X is a partial order (so the notation "≤" is appropriate). Each set of elements has a least upper bound (their "join") and a greatest lower bound (their "meet"), so that it forms a lattice , and more specifically (for partitions of

330-517: Is from the Greek language Greek : διχοτομία dichotomía "dividing in two" from δίχα dícha "in two, asunder" and τομή tomḗ "a cutting, incision". Partition of a set Every equivalence relation on a set defines a partition of this set, and every partition defines an equivalence relation. A set equipped with an equivalence relation or a partition is sometimes called a setoid , typically in type theory and proof theory . A partition of

352-397: Is suggestive of the idea that the partition is the set X divided in to cells. The notation also evokes the idea that, from the equivalence relation one may construct the partition. The rank of P {\displaystyle P} is | X | − | P | {\displaystyle |X|-|P|} , if X {\displaystyle X}

374-512: Is the Bell number B n . The first several Bell numbers are B 0 = 1, B 1 = 1, B 2 = 2, B 3 = 5, B 4 = 15, B 5 = 52, and B 6 = 203 (sequence A000110 in the OEIS ). Bell numbers satisfy the recursion and have the exponential generating function The Bell numbers may also be computed using the Bell triangle in which the first value in each row is copied from

396-418: Is the partition of the vertices of the complete graph into the connected components of the subgraph formed by the given set of edges. In this way, the lattice of partitions corresponds to the lattice of flats of the graphic matroid of the complete graph. Another example illustrates refinement of partitions from the perspective of equivalence relations. If D is the set of cards in a standard 52-card deck,

418-421: The same-color-as relation on D – which can be denoted ~ C – has two equivalence classes: the sets {red cards} and {black cards}. The 2-part partition corresponding to ~ C has a refinement that yields the same-suit-as relation ~ S , which has the four equivalence classes {spades}, {diamonds}, {hearts}, and {clubs}. A partition of the set N = {1, 2, ..., n } with corresponding equivalence relation ~

440-410: The end of the previous row, and subsequent values are computed by adding two numbers, the number to the left and the number to the above left of the position. The Bell numbers are repeated along both sides of this triangle. The numbers within the triangle count partitions in which a given element is the largest singleton . The number of partitions of an n -element set into exactly k (non-empty) parts

462-503: The equivalence relation may be constructed from the partition. Conversely every equivalence relation may be identified with a partition. This is why it is sometimes said informally that "an equivalence relation is the same as a partition". If P is the partition identified with a given equivalence relation ∼ {\displaystyle \sim } , then some authors write P = X / ∼ {\displaystyle P=X/{\sim }} . This notation

SECTION 20

#1732790794892

484-398: The partition. If a ∈ X {\displaystyle a\in X} then we represent the cell containing a {\displaystyle a} by [ a ] {\displaystyle [a]} . That is to say, [ a ] {\displaystyle [a]} is notation for the cell in P {\displaystyle P} which contains

#891108