The Employment Medical Advisory Service is a statutory public service in Great Britain operated as part of the Field Operations Directorate of the Health and Safety Executive .
46-617: The Service was created by the Employment Medical Advisory Service Act 1972 and, as of 2009, is governed by sections Part II of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 . Section 55 of the 1974 Act defines the Service's purpose as: The Service is staffed by doctors and nurses who are specialists in occupational health and who are specifically able to: The Service's doctors and nurses enjoy all
92-516: A prima facie case against the accused. Only if the prosecution succeed in this does the defendant have the burden of proving that the alternative was not practicable or reasonably practicable, but only on the balance of probabilities . The Court of Appeal held in 2002 that this requirement was compliant with article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) as to presumption of innocence . The Court of Appeal noted that
138-512: A bill that year. The act lays down general principles for the management of health and safety at work, enabling the creation of specific requirements through regulations enacted as statutory instruments or through a code of practice . For example, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 ( SI 2002 /2677), the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 ,
184-643: A code of practice is not in itself a criminal offence it may be evidential towards a criminal breach under the Act (section 17) Because individual litigation is unlikely, given that employees may find the regulations complex, the Health and Safety Executive enforces the Act. However, the HSE may also delegate its functions to local government under section 18, which allows for a more decentralised and targeted approach to regulation. Any enforcing authority may appoint inspectors with
230-615: A duty under the Act or a regulation, contravention of a notice, or obstructing an inspector. In England and Wales prosecution under the Act could originally only be brought by an inspector or with the permission of the Director of Public Prosecutions but the Environment Agency was also authorised on 1 April 1996 (section 38). All offences under the Act are either summary offences or offences triable either way so inspectors start prosecutions by laying an information before
276-422: A mould plug during a routine operation at Harrison Castings Ltd. The burns required several skin grafts and five days in hospital for the employee. Inspector Munera Sidat said that the accident could have been prevented had the company provided the right type of gloves saying "Instead of foundry gloves which provide heat resistance, he was wearing rigger gloves which offered him very little protection. Not only did
322-475: A risk to the health and safety of a person other than the self-employed person or their employees. Section 4 defines a duty of occupiers of premises, for example commercial landlords , managers of serviced office accommodation, and also maintenance contractors, towards people who use those premises for work. Those premises, and the means of entry and exit, must be, as far as reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health. An "article for use at work"
368-463: A set of regulations created under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 which came into force in Great Britain on 1 January 1993. The regulations place a duty on every employer to ensure that suitable personal protective equipment is provided to employees who may be exposed to a risk to their health or safety while at work. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is defined in
414-614: A system of public supervision through the creation of the Health and Safety Commission and Health and Safety Executive , since merged, and bestows extensive enforcement powers, ultimately backed by criminal sanctions extending to unlimited fines and imprisonment for up to two years. Further, the act provides a critical interface with the law of the European Union on workplace health and safety. Secretary of State for Employment and Productivity Barbara Castle introduced an Employed Persons (Health and Safety) Bill in 1970 but
460-561: A way which does not expose non-employees - or themselves - to risks to their health and safety, so far as is reasonably practicable. This duty applies only to self-employed persons who conduct undertakings of a "prescribed description" (as defined by regulation 2 of The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (General Duties of Self-Employed Persons) (Prescribed Undertakings) Regulations 2015). The prescribed undertakings are agricultural activity; asbestos; construction; gas; genetically modified organisms; railways; or any other activity which may pose
506-589: A written document stating their powers. This is as evidence of their authority (section 19). Enforcing authorities may indemnify the inspector against any civil litigation if he has acted in the honest belief that he was within his powers (section 26). Local government bodies who may be enforcing authorities are: Local government bodies can be enforcing authorities in respect of several workplaces and activities including offices , shops , retail and wholesale distribution, hotel and catering establishments, petrol filling stations , residential care homes and
SECTION 10
#1732766114948552-422: Is a narrower term than 'physically possible' and seems to me to imply that a computation must be made by the owner in which the quantum of risk is placed on one scale and the sacrifice involved in the measures necessary for averting the risk (whether in money, time or trouble) is placed in the other, and that, if it be shown that there is a gross disproportion between them – the risk being insignificant in relation to
598-595: Is any (s.53(1)): Section 6(1) defines the duty of any person who designs , manufactures , imports or supplies any article for use at work to: A person may rely on testing done by others so long as it is reasonable for him to do so (s.6(6)). A person may rely on a written undertaking by another person to ensure the safety of an item (s.6(8)) Designers and manufacturers must carry out research to identify and eliminate risks, as far as reasonably practicable (s.6(2)). Erectors and installers have responsibilities to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that an article
644-444: Is of the opinion that a person is currently contravening the Act; or has contravened the Act in the past in circumstances that make it likely that the contravention will continue or be repeated he may serve him with an improvement notice (section 21) : Appeal against a notice is within 21 days to an employment tribunal who may appoint one or more assessors to sit with them (s.24). An appeal against an Improvement Notice has
690-495: Is responsible for enforcement of the act and regulations made under it though the Secretary of State may transfer some of the duties to local government (section 18). The Secretary of State has broad powers to make health and safety regulations (section 15). Breach of regulations can lead to criminal prosecution under section 33. Further, the Health and Safety Executive can issue codes of practice (section 16). Though breach of
736-542: Is so erected and installed that it will be safe and without risks to health at all times when it is being set, used, cleaned or maintained by a person at work (s.6(3)). Section 6 was extended by the Consumer Protection Act 1987 to cover fairground equipment and its use by persons at work and enjoyment by members of the public. Section 6(4) defines the duty of any person who manufactures, imports or supplies any substance for use at work to: Similar to
782-563: Is within 21 days to an employment tribunal who may appoint one or more assessors to sit with them (section 24). An appeal against a Prohibition Notice, unlike an appeal against an Improvement Notice (see above) does not suspend the Prohibition Notice. However, the appellant may make an application for a direction that the Prohibition Notice is suspended whilst the appeal proceedings are ongoing (see section 24(3)(b)). Section 33(1) creates 15 criminal offences including breach of
828-523: The 1970 United Kingdom general election , preferring to wait for the Robens Report which was published in 1972. Conservative Secretary of State for Employment William Whitelaw introduced a new bill on 28 January 1974 but Labour were returned to power in the February 1974 United Kingdom general election and the bill was again lost. The new Labour administration finally secured the passage of
874-454: The Health and Safety Commission and Health and Safety Executive , who performed their respective functions on behalf of the Crown (section 10 and Schedule 2). The bodies had wide powers to further their objectives by all means other than borrowing money (ss.11(6), 13). On 1 April 2008, the two bodies merged, the aggregate taking the name Health and Safety Executive. Before its merger with
920-649: The Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 ( SI 1992 /2966) and the Health and Safety (First-Aid) Regulations 1981 are all statutory instruments that lay down detailed requirements. It was also the intention of the act to rationalise the existing complex and confused system of legislation (section 1(2)). Since the accession of the UK to the European Union (EU) in 1972, much health and safety regulation has needed to comply with
966-609: The Product Liability Directive 85/374/EEC. Section 1 sets out the objectives of the act as: As originally enacted, there was a fourth objective: but this provision was repealed when control of emissions was brought under a uniform scheme of legislation by the Environmental Protection Act 1990 . In general, the other provisions about emissions in the original act have subsequently been repealed. Section 2 states that "It shall be
SECTION 20
#17327661149481012-567: The United Kingdom . The act defines general duties on employers , employees , contractors , suppliers of goods and substances for use at work, persons in control of work premises, and those who manage and maintain them, and persons in general. The act enables a broad regime of regulation by government ministers through statutory instruments which has, in the years since 1974, generated an extensive system of specific provisions for various industries, disciplines and risks. It established
1058-415: The law of the European Union and statutory instruments under the act have been enacted in order to implement EU directives . In particular, the act is the principal means of complying with Directive 89/391/EEC on health and safety at work. Further important changes to section 6, duties in respect of articles and substances used at work, were made by the Consumer Protection Act 1987 in order to implement
1104-495: The leisure industry . As of 2008 , 410 such bodies have responsibility in 1.1 million workplaces. From 1 April 2006 the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) became the enforcing authority for the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and laws made under it, for all health and safety matters relating to the operation of a railway (or tramway). Under section, inspectors have the following powers: The Consumer Protection Act 1987 added
1150-480: The magistrates' court . Inspectors can themselves be authorised to exercise rights of audience before the Magistrates even though not legally qualified (section 39). If a person, by some act or omission, causes another person to commit the actus reus of an offence under the Act then they too are guilty of an offence, even if the other person was not prosecuted or could not be prosecuted because they were
1196-463: The "reverse burden" applied to purely regulatory breaches, rather than genuine criminal offences potentially punishable by imprisonment . However, the Health and Safety (Offences) Act 2008 extended the sentences available for these offences to include imprisonment for two years. Before it was passed, the Department for Work and Pensions expressed the opinion that this is still compliant with
1242-533: The Commission (section 12). On 1 April 2006, the Commission ceased to have responsibility for railway safety . The Commission could delegate any of its functions to, or otherwise direct, the Executive (section 11(4)) and could direct the Executive to hold a public inquiry or other investigation into any accident (section 14). However, as of 1 April 2008, all its powers and responsibilities were transferred to
1288-404: The Crown (section 36). Where an offence is committed by a body corporate with the consent or connivance, or by the neglect, of a director , manager , secretary or a member acting in a managerial capacity, that individual too is guilty of an offence (section 37). Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 The Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 are
1334-554: The ECHR as it "strikes a fair balance between the fundamental right of the individual and the general interests of the community". In 2005, the European Commission challenged the defence as noncompliant with Directive 89/391/EEC, which states that (Art.5(1) and (4)): "The employer shall have a duty to ensure the safety and health of workers in every aspect related to the work." but that "This Directive shall not restrict
1380-489: The Executive. The executive consists of a chairman and between 7 and 11 other people, all appointed by the Secretary of State, as of 2008 , the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Schedule 2). Before the 2008 merger, the executive had to carry out all functions delegated to it, or otherwise directed by, the commission and provide the Secretary of State with information and expert advice (section 11(5)). The executive
1426-481: The HSE, the commission consisted of a chairman and between six and nine other people, appointed by the appropriate Secretary of State, after consultation (section 10(2)-(4)). The commission's duties were to (section 11(2)): The commission further had to keep the Secretary of State informed of its plans and ensure alignment with the policies of the Secretary of State, giving effect to any directions given to it (section 11(3)). The Secretary of State could give directions to
Employment Medical Advisory Service - Misplaced Pages Continue
1472-520: The Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at Work Regulations 2022 come into force. They extend the duty on employers to provide personal protective equipment (PPE), including clothing, to those who are classified as "limb (b) workers". Unlike employees, who are "limb (a) workers" and work under an employment contract, limb (b) workers undertake work via a "contract for service" and usually have a more casual working relationship with
1518-471: The UK are not relieved of liability for activities such as design and manufacture that took place outside the UK and over which they had control. Finance companies who supply articles or substances by way of hire purchase or credit agreement have no duties under section 6 (s.6(9)). Under section 7 all employees have a duty while at work to: Section 8 requires that "no person shall intentionally or recklessly interfere with or misuse anything provided in
1564-476: The debate around the bill soon generated a belief that it did not address fundamental issues of workplace safety. In the same year, the Occupational Safety and Health Act was passed into United States federal law . As a result, a committee of inquiry chaired by Lord Robens was established towards the end of Harold Wilson's first government . The Conservative Party then came to power following
1610-571: The directive but in 2007 the European Court of Justice found for the UK that the defence was in fact compliant. Section 6(10) was added by the Consumer Protection Act 1987 disapplies duties as to articles and substances used at work where a risk "is shown to be one the occurrence of which could not reasonably be foreseen ". This is known as the development risks defence . Section 10 created two bodies corporate ,
1656-434: The duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable , the health, safety and welfare at work of all his/her employees " (emphasis added), and in particular that such a duty extends to: Section 3(1) imposes a duty on employers to conduct their undertaking so as to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safety of persons other than employees. This could include, for example, contractors, visitors,
1702-468: The effect of suspending the Improvement Notice (see section 24(3)(a)). If an inspector is of the opinion that activities are being carried on, or are likely to be carried on, involving the risk of serious personal injury , he may serve him with a prohibition notice (section 22): The notice may start immediately or at the end of a specified period (section 22(4). Appeal against a notice
1748-490: The employer. See also: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/8/contents/made The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 also states that employers are not allowed to charge for any PPE that is used for work. The regulations also impose requirements with respect to— On 25 June 2008 a moulding company in Leicester was fined £5,300 and ordered to pay £2,134.10 after an employee suffered serious burns after he removed
1794-669: The general public and clients. Employers must also prepare and keep under review a safety policy and to bring it to the attention of his employees (section 2(2)). Trade unions may appoint safety representatives and demand safety committees. The representatives have a right to be consulted on safety issues (sections 2(4), (6) and (7)). Since 1996 employers have had a duty to consult all employees on safety matters. No employer may charge an employee for provision of health and safety arrangements (section 9). The act does not apply to domestic servants (section 51). Section 3(2) requires that some self-employed persons conduct their undertaking in
1840-438: The interests of health, safety or welfare in pursuance of any of the relevant statutory provisions." What is reasonably practicable is a question of fact . The Court of Appeal held in 1949 that in every case, it is the risk that has to be weighed against the measures necessary to eliminate the risk. The greater the risk, no doubt, the less will be the weight to be given to the factor of cost. and: Reasonably practicable
1886-426: The option of Member States to provide for the exclusion or the limitation of employers' responsibility where occurrences are due to unusual and unforeseeable circumstances, beyond the employers' control, or to exceptional events, the consequences of which could not have been avoided despite the exercise of all due care." The commission argued that the "reasonably practicable" defence was much broader than allowed under
Employment Medical Advisory Service - Misplaced Pages Continue
1932-452: The power for a customs officer to seize imported goods for up to 48 hours (section 25A). In observance of the principle of a right to silence , answers given to questions that the inspector required a person to answer cannot be used as evidence against him, nor his spouse or civil partner (section 20(7)), neither can the inspector require production of a document protected by legal professional privilege (section 20(8)). If an inspector
1978-495: The regulations as "all equipment (including clothing affording protection against the weather) which is intended to be worn or held by a person at work which protects them against one or more risks to their health and safety". PPE would include such things as hard hats, eye protection, safety harnesses, life jackets and safety footwear. The regulations however do not apply where requirements for PPE are detailed in other regulations, these include the: Please note that on 6 April 2022
2024-438: The regulations concerning articles used at work, a person may also rely on testing or written undertaking by another person to ensure the safety of substances used at work. The duty to identify and eliminate risks of substances rests with manufacturers. The duties only extend to persons in business or acting by way of trade , even though not for profit , and only to matters within their control (s.6(7)). Persons who import into
2070-407: The sacrifice – the defendants discharge the onus on them. Where a criminal prosecution arises from a breach of duty and the accused's defence is that it would not have been practicable or reasonably practicable to act otherwise, the burden of proof falls on the defendant (s.40). The prosecution have the burden of showing beyond reasonable doubt that certain acts were done or omitted to provide
2116-546: The statutory powers of other HSE inspectors . Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (c. 37) (abbreviated to "HSWA 1974", "HASWA" or "HASAWA") is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that as of 2011 defines the fundamental structure and authority for the encouragement, regulation and enforcement of workplace health, safety and welfare within
#947052