The Royal Commission Into Whether There Has Been Corrupt or Criminal Conduct By Any Western Australian Police Officer , commonly known as the Kennedy Royal Commission , was a Royal Commission established in 2002 by the state government of Western Australia to determine whether any officer of the Western Australia Police had engaged in corrupt or criminal conduct . The commission issued an interim report on 20 December 2002 and a final report on 30 January 2004.
6-523: The commissioner was Hon. G. A. Kennedy QC. Establishment of the commission arose from widespread public concern over the behaviour and integrity of the Western Australia Police. The terms of reference required inquiry into factual matters and the effectiveness of police procedures. The final report of the commission concluded that: ... the full range of corrupt or criminal conduct from stealing to assaults, perjury, drug dealing and
12-413: A shared goal. Terms of reference show how the object in question will be defined, developed, and verified. They should also provide a documented basis for making future decisions and for confirming or developing a common understanding of the scope among stakeholders . In order to meet these criteria, success factors/risks and constraints are fundamental. They define the: TORs could include: Although
18-630: Is a matter of concern. A principal recommendation was that a Crime and Corruption Commission be established as an oversight body in a system where "the Commissioner of Police should retain the primary responsibility for managing the discipline of the Police Service ". Terms of reference Terms of reference ( TOR ) define the purpose and structures of a project , committee , meeting , negotiation , or any similar collection of people who have agreed to work together to accomplish
24-429: The earlier stages of project management by the founders of the project in question, immediately after the approval of a project business case . They are documented by the project manager and presented to the project sponsor or sponsors for approval. Once the terms have been approved, the members of the project team have a clear definition of the scope of the project. They will then be ready to progress with implementing
30-553: The improper disclosure of confidential information have been examined. [the Western Australian Police force] has been ineffective in monitoring those events and modifying its procedures to deal with that conduct and to prevent its repetition. ... The fact that there remain in WAPS a number of officers who participated in this conduct, and who not only refused to admit it, but also uniformly denied it with vehemence,
36-416: The terms of reference of a project are sometimes referred to as the project charter , there are significant differences between the two. This article describes a TOR containing detailed definitions, while a project charter has high-level requirements, assumptions, constraints and descriptions as well as a budget summary without detail, and a milestone-only schedule. The terms of reference are created during
#810189