The haplotype-relative-risk ( HRR ) method is a family-based method for determining gene allele association to a disease in the presence of actual genetic linkage . Nuclear families with one affected child are sampled using the parental haplotypes not transmitted as a control. While similar to the genotype relative risk (RR), the HRR provides a solution to the problem of population stratification by only sampling within family trios. The HRR method was first proposed by Rubinstein in 1981 then detailed in 1987 by Rubinstein and Falk and is an important tool in genetic association studies.
48-635: HRR may refer to: Haploid-relative-risk , a method for determining gene allele association to a disease Hardy, Rand & Rittler pseudoisochromatic plates, a type of color vision test Harrington railway station , in England Healy River Airport , in Alaska, United States Heart rate reserve Henley Royal Regatta High refresh rate , 120Hz or higher Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae ,
96-418: A B − P a P B {\displaystyle -D=P_{aB}-P_{a}P_{B}} D = P a b − P a P b {\displaystyle D=P_{ab}-P_{a}P_{b}} The sign of D in this case is chosen arbitrarily. The magnitude of D is more important than the sign of D because the magnitude of D is representative of
144-494: A B = D a b {\displaystyle D_{AB}=-D_{Ab}=-D_{aB}=D_{ab}} . Their relationships can be characterized as follows. D = P A B − P A P B {\displaystyle D=P_{AB}-P_{A}P_{B}} − D = P A b − P A P b {\displaystyle -D=P_{Ab}-P_{A}P_{b}} − D = P
192-515: A Rockwell scale of materials' hardness Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title HRR . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HRR&oldid=1258799495 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Articles containing German-language text Short description
240-406: A case-control study , then we may use the d method due to its asymmetry. If we are trying to find the probability that a given haplotype will descend in a population without being recombined by other haplotypes, then it may be better to use the ρ method. But for most scenarios, r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} tends to be the most popular method due to the usefulness of
288-403: A heatmap , where colors are used to indicate the loci with positive linkage disequilibrium, and linkage equilibrium. This example displays the full heatmap, but because the heatmap is symmetrical across the diagonal (that is, the linkage disequilibrium between loci A and B is the same as between B and A), a triangular heatmap that shows the pairs only once is also commonly employed. This method has
336-504: A collection of ancient fragmentary Latin history-works The History of Rock and Roll , a radio documentary Holy Roman Empire (German: Heiliges Römisches Reich ) Homologous recombination repair , a major DNA repair pathway that mainly acts on double-strand breaks and interstrand crosslinks Hondo Railway , an American railway Horuru language , dialect of Yalahatan, spoken in Indonesia ISO 639-3 code hrr HRR,
384-409: A haplotype from the expected is a quantity called the linkage disequilibrium and is commonly denoted by a capital D : Thus, if the loci were inherited independently, then x 11 = p 1 q 1 {\displaystyle x_{11}=p_{1}q_{1}} , so D = 0 {\displaystyle D=0} , and there is linkage equilibrium. However, if
432-416: A high linkage disequilibrium. The advantage of this method is that it shows the individual genotype frequencies and includes a visual difference between absolute (where the alleles at the two loci always appear together) and complete (where alleles at the two loci show a strong connection but with the possibility of recombination) linkage disequilibrium by the shape of the graph. Another visualization option
480-411: A maximum value of 1, its minimum value for two loci is equal to | r | {\displaystyle |r|} for those loci. Consider the haplotypes for two loci A and B with two alleles each—a two-loci, two-allele model. Then the following table defines the frequencies of each combination: Note that these are relative frequencies . One can use the above frequencies to determine
528-498: A random haplotype in their parents. A fraction x 11 {\displaystyle x_{11}} of those are A 1 B 1 {\displaystyle A_{1}B_{1}} . A fraction c {\displaystyle c} have recombined these two loci. If the parents result from random mating, the probability of the copy at locus A {\displaystyle A} having allele A 1 {\displaystyle A_{1}}
SECTION 10
#1732783548848576-430: Is p 1 {\displaystyle p_{1}} and the probability of the copy at locus B {\displaystyle B} having allele B 1 {\displaystyle B_{1}} is q 1 {\displaystyle q_{1}} , and as these copies are initially in the two different gametes that formed the diploid genotype, these are independent events so that
624-592: Is a property of the pair { A , B } {\displaystyle \{A,B\}} of alleles and not of their respective loci. Other pairs of alleles at those same two loci may have different coefficients of linkage disequilibrium. For two biallelic loci, where a and b are the other alleles at these two loci, the restrictions are so strong that only one value of D is sufficient to represent all linkage disequilibrium relationships between these alleles. In this case, D A B = − D A b = − D
672-568: Is defined as Linkage disequilibrium corresponds to D A B ≠ 0 {\displaystyle D_{AB}\neq 0} . In the case D A B = 0 {\displaystyle D_{AB}=0} we have p A B = p A p B {\displaystyle p_{AB}=p_{A}p_{B}} and the alleles A and B are said to be in linkage equilibrium . The subscript "AB" on D A B {\displaystyle D_{AB}} emphasizes that linkage disequilibrium
720-471: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Haploid-relative-risk The original method proposed by Falk and Rubinstien fell under scrutiny in 1989, when Ott showed the equivalence of HRR to the classical RR method demonstrating that the HRR holds only when there is zero chance of recombination between a disease locus and its markers. Yet, even when
768-407: Is forests of hierarchical latent class models (FHLCM). All loci are plotted along the top layer of the graph, and below this top layer, boxes representing latent variables are added with links to the top level. Lines connect the loci at the top level to the latent variables below, and the lower the level of the box that the loci are connected to, the greater the linkage disequilibrium and the smaller
816-429: Is no correlation between the pair. When | r 2 | = 1 {\displaystyle |r^{2}|=1} , the correlation is either perfect positive or perfect negative according to the sign of r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} . Another alternative normalizes D {\displaystyle D} by the product of two of the four allele frequencies when
864-584: Is positive linkage disequilibrium. Conversely, if the observed frequency were lower, then x 11 < p 1 q 1 {\displaystyle x_{11}<p_{1}q_{1}} , D < 0 {\displaystyle D<0} , and there is negative linkage disequilibrium. The following table illustrates the relationship between the haplotype frequencies and allele frequencies and D. Additionally, we can normalize our data based on what we are trying to accomplish. For example, if we aim to create an association map in
912-436: Is sometimes referred to as gametic phase disequilibrium ; however, the concept also applies to asexual organisms and therefore does not depend on the presence of gametes . Suppose that among the gametes that are formed in a sexually reproducing population, allele A occurs with frequency p A {\displaystyle p_{A}} at one locus (i.e. p A {\displaystyle p_{A}}
960-476: Is the correlation coefficient between pairs of loci, usually expressed as its square, r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} . The value of r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} will be within the range − 1 ≤ r 2 ≤ 1 {\displaystyle -1\leq r^{2}\leq 1} . When r 2 = 0 {\displaystyle r^{2}=0} , there
1008-481: Is the frequency of the AB haplotype ). The association between the alleles A and B can be regarded as completely random—which is known in statistics as independence —when the occurrence of one does not affect the occurrence of the other, in which case the probability that both A and B occur together is given by the product p A p B {\displaystyle p_{A}p_{B}} of
SECTION 20
#17327835488481056-407: Is the proportion of gametes with A at that locus), while at a different locus allele B occurs with frequency p B {\displaystyle p_{B}} . Similarly, let p A B {\displaystyle p_{AB}} be the frequency with which both A and B occur together in the same gamete (i.e. p A B {\displaystyle p_{AB}}
1104-428: The correlation coefficient in statistics. A couple examples of where r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} may be very useful would include measuring the recombination rate in an evolving population, or detecting disease associations. In the absence of evolutionary forces other than random mating , Mendelian segregation , random chromosomal assortment , and chromosomal crossover (i.e. in
1152-455: The HHR which can be estimated by H R R = a ′ b ′ ∗ d ′ c ′ {\displaystyle HRR={\frac {a^{'}}{b^{'}}}*{\frac {d^{'}}{c^{'}}}} a denotes the observed frequency of children who are positive for the gene allele H. b denotes
1200-547: The absence of natural selection , inbreeding , and genetic drift ), the linkage disequilibrium measure D {\displaystyle D} converges to zero along the time axis at a rate depending on the magnitude of the recombination rate c {\displaystyle c} between the two loci. Using the notation above, D = x 11 − p 1 q 1 {\displaystyle D=x_{11}-p_{1}q_{1}} , we can demonstrate this convergence to zero as follows. In
1248-433: The advantage of being easy to interpret, but it also cannot display information about other variables that may be of interest. More robust visualization options are also available, like the textile plot. In a textile plot, combinations of alleles at a certain loci can be linked with combinations of alleles at a different loci. Each genotype (combination of alleles) is represented by a circle which has an area proportional to
1296-639: The allele frequencies at the two loci being compared and can only range fully from zero to one where either the allele frequencies at both loci are equal, P A = P B {\displaystyle P_{A}=P_{B}} where D > 0 {\displaystyle D>0} , or when the allele frequencies have the relationship P A = 1 − P B {\displaystyle P_{A}=1-P_{B}} when D < 0 {\displaystyle D<0} . While D ′ {\displaystyle D'} can always take
1344-401: The allele of interest H. H is the allele of interest. Linkage disequilibrium ‹The template How-to is being considered for merging .› In population genetics , linkage disequilibrium ( LD ) is a measure of non-random association between segments of DNA ( alleles ) at different positions on the chromosome ( loci ) in a given population based on a comparison between
1392-712: The d method, this alternative normalizes D {\displaystyle D} by the product of two of the four allele frequencies when the two frequencies represent alleles from different loci. ρ = D ( 1 − p A ) p B {\displaystyle \rho ={\frac {D}{(1-p_{A})p_{B}}}} The measures r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} and D ′ {\displaystyle D'} have limits to their ranges and do not range over all values of zero to one for all pairs of loci. The maximum of r 2 {\displaystyle r^{2}} depends on
1440-611: The degree of linkage disequilibrium. However, positive D value means that the gamete is more frequent than expected while negative means that the combination of these two alleles are less frequent than expected. Linkage disequilibrium in asexual populations can be defined in a similar way in terms of population allele frequencies. Furthermore, it is also possible to define linkage disequilibrium among three or more alleles, however these higher-order associations are not commonly used in practice. The linkage disequilibrium D {\displaystyle D} reflects both changes in
1488-406: The distance between the loci. While this method does not have the same advantages of the textile plot, it does allow for the visualization of loci that are far apart without requiring the sequence to be rearranged, as is the case with the textile plot. This is not an exhaustive list of visualization methods, and multiple methods may be used to display a data set in order to give a better picture of
HRR - Misplaced Pages Continue
1536-435: The frequency at which two alleles are detected together at the same loci versus the frequencies at which each allele is simply detected (alone or with the second allele) at that same loci. Loci are said to be in linkage disequilibrium when the frequency of being detected together (the frequency of association of their different alleles) is higher or lower than expected if the loci were independent and associated randomly. While
1584-404: The frequency of each of the alleles: If the two loci and the alleles are independent from each other, then we would expect the frequency of each haplotype to be equal to the product of the frequencies of its corresponding alleles (e.g. x 11 = p 1 q 1 {\displaystyle x_{11}=p_{1}q_{1}} ). The deviation of the observed frequency of
1632-438: The frequency of that genotype, with a column for each loci. Lines are drawn from each circle to the circles in the other column(s), and the thickness of the connecting line is proportional to the frequency that the two genotypes occur together. Linkage disequilibrium is seen through the number of line crossings in the diagram, where a greater number of line crossings indicates a low linkage disequilibrium and fewer crossings indicate
1680-407: The future due to recombination. However, the smaller the distance between the two loci, the smaller will be the rate of convergence of D {\displaystyle D} to zero. Once linkage disequilibrium has been calculated for a dataset, a visualization method is often chosen to display the linkage disequilibrium to make it more easily understandable. The most common method is to use
1728-514: The intensity of the linkage correlation and changes in gene frequency. This poses an issue when comparing linkage disequilibrium between alleles with differing frequencies. Normalization of linkage disequilibrium allows these alleles to be compared more easily. Lewontin suggested calculating the normalized linkage disequilibrium (also referred to as relative linkage disequilibrium) D ′ {\displaystyle D'} by dividing D {\displaystyle D} by
1776-684: The loci are independent. When − 1 ≤ D ′ < 0 {\displaystyle -1\leq D'<0} , the alleles are found less often than expected. When 0 < D ′ ≤ 1 {\displaystyle 0<D'\leq 1} , the alleles are found more often than expected. Note that | D ′ | {\displaystyle |D'|} may be used in place of D ′ {\displaystyle D'} when measuring how close two alleles are to linkage equilibrium. An alternative to D ′ {\displaystyle D'}
1824-573: The more unlikely. This model represents a case which there is a single locus where all genotypes may lead to expression of the allele in its most simplified definition. Under these parameters a linkage disequilibrium of more than 50% means there is a possible link to the gene allele and inheritance. H R R = P 1 1 − P 1 ∗ 1 − P 2 P 2 {\displaystyle HRR={\frac {P_{1}}{1-P_{1}}}*{\frac {1-P_{2}}{P_{2}}}} Gives
1872-416: The next generation, x 11 ′ {\displaystyle x_{11}'} , the frequency of the haplotype A 1 B 1 {\displaystyle A_{1}B_{1}} , becomes This follows because a fraction ( 1 − c ) {\displaystyle (1-c)} of the haplotypes in the offspring have not recombined, and are thus copies of
1920-442: The observed frequency of children who are negative for the gene allele H. c is the observed frequency of families with at least one transmitted parental marker allele H. d is the observed frequency of families with no transmitted parental marker allele H. P 1 is the probability this child is positive for the allele of interest H. P 2 is the probability that at least one of the nontransmitted parental marker alleles equals
1968-537: The observed frequency of haplotype A 1 B 1 {\displaystyle A_{1}B_{1}} were higher than what would be expected based on the individual frequencies of A 1 {\displaystyle A_{1}} and B 1 {\displaystyle B_{1}} then x 11 > p 1 q 1 {\displaystyle x_{11}>p_{1}q_{1}} , so D > 0 {\displaystyle D>0} , and there
HRR - Misplaced Pages Continue
2016-459: The other will. A positive association result from both TDT and HRR means there is strong evidence that a link exists and vice versa. For example, both HRR and TDT methods were used in a study looking for polymorphism in D2 and D3 dopamine receptor in association with schizophrenia and neither found any evidence for linkage, making an actual role of those genes in the etiology of the mental disorder all
2064-676: The pattern of linkage disequilibrium in a genome is a powerful signal of the population genetic processes that are structuring it, it does not indicate why the pattern emerges by itself. Linkage disequilibrium is influenced by many factors, including selection , the rate of genetic recombination , mutation rate , genetic drift , the system of mating , population structure , and genetic linkage . In spite of its name, linkage disequilibrium may exist between alleles at different loci without any genetic linkage between them and independently of whether or not allele frequencies are in equilibrium (not changing with time). Furthermore, linkage disequilibrium
2112-672: The probabilities can be multiplied. This formula can be rewritten as so that where D {\displaystyle D} at the n {\displaystyle n} -th generation is designated as D n {\displaystyle D_{n}} . Thus we have If n → ∞ {\displaystyle n\to \infty } , then ( 1 − c ) n → 0 {\displaystyle (1-c)^{n}\to 0} so that D n {\displaystyle D_{n}} converges to zero. If at some time we observe linkage disequilibrium, it will disappear in
2160-479: The probabilities. There is said to be a linkage disequilibrium between the two alleles whenever p A B {\displaystyle p_{AB}} differs from p A p B {\displaystyle p_{A}p_{B}} for any reason. The level of linkage disequilibrium between A and B can be quantified by the coefficient of linkage disequilibrium D A B {\displaystyle D_{AB}} , which
2208-475: The recombination factor for a locus and its genetic markers is >0 HRR estimates are still more conservative than RR estimates. While the HRR method has proven an effective means of avoiding population stratification biases, another family-based association test known as the transmission disequilibrium test , or TDT, is more commonly used. Some research uses both HRR and TDT for their ability to complement each other since one result may give no association while
2256-419: The theoretical maximum difference between the observed and expected allele frequencies as follows: where The value of D ′ {\displaystyle D'} will be within the range − 1 ≤ D ′ ≤ 1 {\displaystyle -1\leq D'\leq 1} . When D ′ = 0 {\displaystyle D'=0} ,
2304-435: The two frequencies represent alleles from the same locus. This allows comparison of asymmetry between a pair of loci. This is often used in case-control studies where B {\displaystyle B} is the locus containing a disease allele. d = D p B ( 1 − p B ) {\displaystyle d={\frac {D}{p_{B}(1-p_{B})}}} Similar to
#847152