Misplaced Pages

#940059

29-435: ODAS may refer to: Outdoor distributed antenna system OCA-DLR Asteroid Survey Oceanographic Data Acquisition System , a system used by a certain class of US Navy ships Ocean Data Acquisition System , a fixed-point ocean-based meteorological monitoring device Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with

58-426: A combination of technologies that make quality wireless broadband possible. According to international communications company Ericsson, heterogeneous networks help wireless customers enjoy activities that require a large amount of data, such as watching streaming videos, uploading photos and using cloud storage services . HetNets use both radio and cellular technologies. To advocate for deployment of HetNet, WIA runs

87-468: A dedicated wireless two-way communications system for fire department use. This system is called FDNY Auxiliary Radio Communication System (commonly Referred to as ARCS). Such systems are required under Section 907.2.13.2 of the New York City 2014 Building Code. These systems allow on-scene communications throughout a building of any size. The Industry designs and builds DAS systems in line with

116-472: A distributed antenna system to create an area of wireless coverage, it is possible to use this technique to propagate indoor WiFi for commercial uses. It is estimated that only about 5% of commercial WiFi use a distributed antenna system. Distributed antenna systems may be placed inside buildings for increasing wireless signals within buildings. Often they are placed within large structures such as stadiums or corporate headquarters. Systems are also placed in

145-570: A factor N and the power per antenna is reduced by a factor N where a simple power-law path-loss model with path-loss exponent n is assumed. As an alternative, the total area covered could be extended for a given limit of effective radiated power, which may be important to ensure compliance with safety limits on radiation into the human body. Prior to the invention by Saleh et al. , tunnel transmitters and leaky feeders had been used to provide radio reception in tunnels, mines, subway lines, and other indoor and underground spaces. Using

174-489: A former FCC commissioner , is the president and CEO of WIA. Adelstein worked in public service for 25 years before joining WIA. In February 2014, Adelstein told C-SPAN that his goal was to bring wireless connectivity to everyone in the United States. Tim House is WIA's Executive Vice President. Before WIA, House worked in consumer product marketing at Discovery Communications. WIA was founded in 1949. The focus of

203-469: A membership forum called the HetNet Forum. The purpose of the forum is to advance the development of heterogeneous networks in the United States, as well as to push policies related to distributed antenna systems (DAS), small cells, and fiber backhaul. Several major U.S. wireless carriers, such as AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless, serve as governing members of the forum. Prior to April 2013,

232-493: A national problem. The amicus curiae brief cited evidence that over 3,300 wireless service facility siting applications were pending before local jurisdictions throughout the country, and that around 180 of those applications had been pending for over three years. In 2012, Congress passed and President Barack Obama signed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act. The law included a provision related to

261-694: A pole attachment rulings which require the utility to allow Distributed Antenna Systems in the utility right-of-way in August 2014. New York : In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, all public safety agencies understood the importance of radio systems. The solution was codified by the NYC Building Code Chapter 9, and NYC Fire Department Rule 3. All high-rise buildings in New York must have

290-465: A priority on unserved communities. WIA helped convince Congress and the Administration to provide agencies with the needed flexibility to allow all broadband technologies, including mobile and fixed wireless, the opportunity to compete for funding. The all of-the-above broadband strategy, as pursued by WIA, will help close the digital divide and win the race to 5G. One of the main issues facing

319-837: Is not the case . PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association#HetNet Forum The Wireless Infrastructure Association ( WIA ), formerly known as PCIA, is an American trade association for wireless providers and companies that build cell phone towers, rooftop wireless sites, and other facilities that transmit wireless communication signals. The Washington Post described the industry as "the people who build all those cell towers so you can actually make those calls, download that data." These technologies are collectively referred to as "wireless telecommunications infrastructure." Examples of companies that are members of WIA include American Tower , Ericsson, Graybar , JMA Wireless , Qualcomm , and SBA Communications. In all, member companies own and run more than 125,000 towers and antennas in

SECTION 10

#1732775696941

348-599: Is to place 5,000 veterans in jobs by 2015. WIA has pledged money to the program. WIA advocated an effort passed by the FCC commonly referred to as The "5G Upgrade Order," which made key clarifications for wireless deployment. The Order: WIA has been the leading voice in lobbying Congress to include wireless for funding eligibility in its landmark infrastructure bill. The bipartisan-passed legislation will provide $ 65 billion for broadband deployment and access. This legislation will promote wireless infrastructure deployment, with

377-617: The Connectivity Expo, also known as Connect (X). Previously WIA hosted the Wireless Infrastructure Show. The Chairman of WIA is Jeffrey A. Stoops, president and chief executive officer of SBA Communications Corp. The previous chairman was David Weisman, president of InSite Wireless Group, which was an independent tower company. American Tower announced an agreement to buy InSite's assets in late 2020 for approximately $ 3,5 billion. Jonathan Adelstein ,

406-431: The FCC's work in the areas mentioned above, while local governments have typically been opposed. Thomas and Svor wrote: Industry's universal support for the FCC's proposals has been matched by local government's hostility towards them. State and local governments view the measures as an unwarranted - and unconstitutional - federal incursion into state and local authority. HetNets, short for "Heterogeneous Networks", are

435-568: The HetNet Forum had been called the DAS Forum. WIA changed the name to accommodate a growing membership that represented a more diverse group of technologies. Instead of running a forum focusing only on DAS, WIA expanded the forum to focus on several technologies such as microcells, picocells, Wi-Fi and remote radio units, in addition to DAS. Other trade associations, such as the Small Cell Forum, have competed with WIA for members from

464-481: The U.S. WIA advocates for a variety of issues before the federal government, on topics such as broadband deployment (the act of building wireless broadband infrastructure in the United States), utility pole attachment (adding wireless signal components to utility poles that already exist), wireless network resiliency, public safety, and wireless competition. WIA hosts an annual conference and trade show called

493-501: The United States. DAS is often used in scenarios where alternate technologies are infeasible due to terrain or zoning challenges. The idea works because less power is wasted in overcoming penetration and shadowing losses, and because a line-of-sight channel is present more frequently, leading to reduced fade depths and reduced delay spread. A distributed antenna system can be implemented using passive splitters and feeders, or active- repeater amplifiers can be included to overcome

522-420: The authority it prescribed is described by the wireless industry as "collocation-by-right". In 2013, WIA submitted comments to the FCC that expressed support in speeding up broadband deployment. WIA helped Congress write legislation that funded broadband deployment. WIA had asked Congress to include infrastructure providers in the list of eligible recipients of federal broadband funding. WIA influenced members of

551-405: The congressional committees that funded the $ 4.7 billion Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) to make eligible wireless carriers, backhaul providers, and tower companies for funds. In 2013, Cisco, American Tower, Dynis, and WIA created a program called Warriors 4 Wireless. The organization helps military veterans train and apply for jobs at wireless companies. The program's stated goal

580-411: The feeder losses. In systems where equalization is applied, it may be desirable to introduce delays between the antenna elements. This artificially increases delay spread in areas of overlapped coverage, permitting quality improvements via time diversity. If a given area is covered by many distributed antenna elements rather than a single antenna, then the total radiated power is reduced by approximately

609-498: The figure, the idea is to split the transmitted power among several antenna elements, separated in space so as to provide coverage over the same area as a single antenna but with reduced total power and improved reliability. A single antenna radiating at high power (a) is replaced by a group of low-power antennas to cover the same area (b). The idea was described in a paper by Saleh et al. in 1987. These antennas have recently been employed by several service providers in many areas around

SECTION 20

#1732775696941

638-427: The group has shifted as technologies have advanced. At various times throughout WIA's history, it has focused on land mobile radio, paging, messaging, personal communications services, and tower and antenna siting. In 2012, WIA submitted an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case Arlington v. FCC . WIA argued in support of the FCC in the case, arguing that local delays in approval of broadband projects are

667-555: The joint operator document known as the Multi Carrier Forum (MCF). Currently the industry operates under MCF2018, although there was a draft released in 2023 for the next iteration to include 5G. It's important to note that the terminology in Australia to describe types of DAS somewhat differs to other regions. For example a 'Passive DAS" globally often refers to an offair repeater based system, whereas in Australia that

696-730: The most important aspects of federal communications laws in terms of being good for the economy and American competitiveness. For decades, the FCC has worked to make sure that critical communications infrastructure can get built with as little hassle as possible. In April 2014, the FCC proposed to simplify the regulatory review process for wireless facilities. These facilities include DAS and small cells (see Small cells and HetNet Forum below for more information). Small cells are built smaller than traditional cells that are typically fixed to large wireless antenna towers. Infrastructure companies attach small cells to utility poles, street light poles, and even traffic lights. The wireless industry has supported

725-559: The outcome through their websites. Federal Communications Commission Rules: The FCC has promulgated the FCC Pole Attachment Order 11-50. Michigan : The METRO Authority, which regulates access to the utility right-of-way determined in 2004 that Distributed Antennae Network Systems are part of the landline infrastructure, and hence are subject to state regulation via an administrative determination. Ohio : The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has issued

754-470: The title ODAS . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ODAS&oldid=933025376 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Distributed antenna system As illustrated in

783-466: The utility right of way on top of utility poles, street light poles and traffic signal poles. Historical regulatory challenges arise at the federal, state and municipal levels. However, regulations have been getting promulgated at the state and federal level, with Midwest states leading the way with state level regulations. Industry resources like The HetNet Forum (formerly The DAS Forum) also address regulatory issues in their conferences and communicate

812-498: The wireless infrastructure industry is related to federal vs. local oversight of wireless infrastructure activity. In a February 2014 article in National Law Review , Washington telecommunications attorneys Dave Thomas and Douglas A. Svor explained the issue and the battle played out between the wireless industry and local governments. In their article, Thomas and Svor state that spectrum and infrastructure serve as

841-436: The wireless infrastructure industry. Specifically, section 6409(a) of the law orders states and local governments to approve requests made by companies to collocate , remove or replace transmission equipment on existing wireless towers or base stations. The law included an exception: if the action substantially changes the physical dimensions of the tower or base station, then the law's protection doesn't apply. The provision and

#940059