Heterodox
62-475: New Economics or New Economy may refer to: New classical macroeconomics New Keynesian economics New economic history, or cliometrics , the systematic application of econometrics See also [ edit ] New Economy movement (disambiguation) All pages beginning with "New econom..." Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with
124-466: A change in the price level while wages stay fixed. Keynes acknowledges that this is undesirable in Point (1) of Section II. In Chapter 9 he provides a homiletic enumeration of the motives to consume or not to do so, finding them to lie in social and psychological considerations which can be expected to be relatively stable, but which may be influenced by objective factors such as 'changes in expectations of
186-403: A consensus on the best way to explain short-run fluctuations in the economy. The new synthesis took elements from both schools. New classical economics contributed the methodology behind real business cycle theory and new Keynesian economics contributed nominal rigidities (slow moving and periodic, rather than continuous, price changes also called sticky prices ). The new synthesis provides
248-419: A considerable degree by the facts about which we feel somewhat confident, even though they may be less decisively relevant to the issue than other facts about which our knowledge is vague and scanty. For this reason the facts of the existing situation enter, in a sense disproportionately, into the formation of our long-term expectations; our usual practice being to take the existing situation and to project it into
310-440: A considerable measure of continuity and stability in our affairs, so long as we can rely on the maintenance of the convention .’ He notes a practical problem: ‘Speculators may do no harm as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise. But the position is serious when enterprise becomes the bubble on a whirlpool of speculation.’ He suggests that: ‘The introduction of a substantial Government transfer tax on all transactions might prove
372-932: A labored rethinking of Keynesian economics. In particular, Lucas designed the Lucas critique primarily as a means to cast doubt on the Keynesian model. This strengthened the case for macro models to be based on microeconomics. After the 1970s, the New Classical school for a while became the dominant school in Macroeconomics. Prior to the late 1990s, macroeconomics was split between new Keynesian work on market imperfections demonstrated with small models and new classical work on real business cycle theory that used fully specified general equilibrium models and used changes in technology to explain fluctuations in economic output. The new neoclassical synthesis developed as
434-500: A result of animal spirits — of a spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction, and not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities. Keynes proposes two theories of liquidity preference (i.e. the demand for money): the first as a theory of interest in Chapter 13 and the second as a correction in Chapter 15. His arguments offer ample scope for criticism, but his final conclusion
496-436: A result of Keynes's choice of units, the assumption of sticky wages, though important to the argument, is largely invisible in the reasoning. If we want to know how a change in the wage rate would influence the economy, Keynes tells us on p. 266 that the effect is the same as that of an opposite change in the money supply. The key notion of expectations is introduced in Chapter 5. Short-term expectations are 'concerned with
558-430: A return, and men who assume financial risks have been known to incur losses as a result instead of profits. Keynes goes on to claim that the demand for money is a function of the interest rate alone on the grounds that: The rate of interest is... the "price" which equilibrates the desire to hold wealth in the form of cash with the available quantity of cash. Frank Knight commented that this seems to assume that demand
620-434: A value in wage units is equal to its price in money terms divided by W, the wage (in money units) per man-hour of labour. Therefore it is a unit expressed in hours of labour. Keynes generally writes a subscript w on quantities expressed in wage units, but in this account we omit the w. When, occasionally, we use real terms for a value which Keynes expresses in wage units we write it in lower case (e.g. y rather than Y). As
682-560: Is a book by English economist John Maynard Keynes published in February 1936. It caused a profound shift in economic thought, giving macroeconomics a central place in economic theory and contributing much of its terminology – the " Keynesian Revolution ". It had equally powerful consequences in economic policy, being interpreted as providing theoretical support for government spending in general, and for budgetary deficits, monetary intervention and counter-cyclical policies in particular. It
SECTION 10
#1732772322073744-479: Is a repudiation of Say's Law . The classical view for which Keynes made Say a mouthpiece held that the value of wages was equal to the value of the goods produced, and that the wages were inevitably put back into the economy sustaining demand at the level of current production. Hence, starting from full employment, there cannot be a glut of industrial output leading to a loss of jobs. As Keynes put it on p. 18, " supply creates its own demand ". Say's Law depends on
806-591: Is a school of thought in macroeconomics that builds its analysis entirely on a neoclassical framework. Specifically, it emphasizes the importance of rigorous foundations based on microeconomics , especially rational expectations . New classical macroeconomics strives to provide neoclassical microeconomic foundations for macroeconomic analysis. This is in contrast with its rival new Keynesian school that uses microfoundations , such as price stickiness and imperfect competition , to generate macroeconomic models similar to earlier, Keynesian ones. Classical economics
868-424: Is at least r. By construction this depends on r alone and is a decreasing function of its argument; it is illustrated in the diagram, and we shall write it as I (r). This schedule is a characteristic of the current industrial process which Irving Fisher described as representing the 'investment opportunity side of interest theory'; and in fact the condition that it should equal S(Y,r) is the equation which determines
930-486: Is based on Walrasian assumptions . All agents are assumed to maximize utility on the basis of rational expectations . At any one time, the economy is assumed to have a unique equilibrium at full employment or potential output achieved through price and wage adjustment. In other words, the market clears at all times. New classical economics has also pioneered the use of representative agent models. Such models have received severe neoclassical criticism, pointing to
992-467: Is based on the interaction between demands for saving, investment, and liquidity (i.e. money). Saving and investment are necessarily equal, but different factors influence decisions concerning them. The desire to save, in Keynes's analysis, is mostly a function of income: the wealthier people are, the more wealth they will seek to put aside. The profitability of investment, on the other hand, is determined by
1054-493: Is currently found in mainstream economics textbooks to this day. The neoclassical school dominated the field up until the Great Depression of the 1930s. Then, however, with the publication of The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money by John Maynard Keynes in 1936, certain neoclassical assumptions were rejected. Keynes proposed an aggregated framework to explain macroeconomic behavior, leading thus to
1116-468: Is equal to the value of current output, that current investment is equal to the value of that part of current output which is not consumed, and that saving is equal to the excess of income over consumption... the equality of saving and investment necessarily follows. This statement incorporates Keynes's definition of saving, which is the normal one. Book III of the General Theory is given over to
1178-485: Is less than the total output, then the economy has to contract until equality is achieved. Keynes thus denied that full employment was the natural result of competitive markets in equilibrium. In this he challenged the conventional ('classical') economic wisdom of his day. In a letter to his friend George Bernard Shaw on New Year's Day, 1935, he wrote: I believe myself to be writing a book on economic theory which will largely revolutionize — not I suppose, at once but in
1240-415: Is pervaded with an air of mistrust for the rationality of free-market decision-making. Keynes denied that an economy would automatically adapt to provide full employment even in equilibrium, and believed that the volatile and ungovernable psychology of markets would lead to periodic booms and crises. The General Theory is a sustained attack on the classical economics orthodoxy of its time. It introduced
1302-556: Is sensible for producers to base their expectations on the assumption that the most recently realized results will continue, except in so far as there are definite reasons for expecting a change.' However (see Chapter 12) long-term expectations are liable to sudden revision. Thus the factor of long-term expectations cannot be even approximately eliminated or replaced by realized results.' Briefly, short-run expectations are typically 'mathematical' in character, long-run expectations less so. The relationship between saving and investment, and
SECTION 20
#17327723220731364-528: Is that liquidity preference is a function mainly of income and the interest rate. The influence of income (which really represents a composite of income and wealth) is common ground with the classical tradition and is embodied in the Quantity Theory ; the influence of interest had also been noted earlier, in particular by Frederick Lavington (see Hicks's Mr Keynes and the "Classics" ). Thus Keynes's final conclusion may be acceptable to readers who question
1426-529: Is the term used for the first modern school of economics. The publication of Adam Smith 's The Wealth of Nations in 1776 is considered to be the birth of the school. Perhaps the central idea behind it is on the ability of the market to be self-correcting as well as being the most superior institution in allocating resources. The central assumption implied is that all individuals maximize their utility. The so-called marginal revolution that occurred in Europe in
1488-463: Is the wage rate in real terms). A system can be analysed on the assumption that W is fixed (i.e. that wages are fixed in money terms) or that W/p is fixed (i.e. that they are fixed in real terms) or that N is fixed (e.g. if wages adapt to ensure full employment). All three assumptions had at times been made by classical economists, but under the assumption of wages fixed in money terms the 'first postulate' becomes an equation in two variables (N and p), and
1550-457: The arguments along the way. However he shows a persistent tendency to think in terms of the Chapter 13 theory while nominally accepting the Chapter 15 correction. Chapter 13 presents the first theory in rather metaphysical terms. Keynes argues that: It should be obvious that the rate of interest cannot be a return to saving or waiting as such. For if a man hoards his savings in cash, he earns no interest, though he saves just as much as before. On
1612-433: The banknotes up again" (...), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing". Book IV discusses
1674-448: The classical relation between wages and the marginal productivity of labour, referring to it on page 5 as the "first postulate of classical economics" and summarising it as saying that "The wage is equal to the marginal product of labour". The first postulate can be expressed in the equation y'(N) = W/p, where y(N) is the real output when employment is N, and W and p are the wage rate and price rate in money terms (and hence W/p
1736-431: The classical theory are applicable to a special case only and not to the general case, the situation which it assumes being a limiting point of the possible positions of equilibrium. Moreover, the characteristics of the special case assumed by the classical theory happen not to be those of the economic society in which we actually live, with the result that its teaching is misleading and disastrous if we attempt to apply it to
1798-432: The concepts of the consumption function , the principle of effective demand and liquidity preference , and gave new prominence to the multiplier and the marginal efficiency of capital . The central argument of The General Theory is that the level of employment is determined not by the price of labour, as in classical economics , but by the level of aggregate demand . If the total demand for goods at full employment
1860-553: The consequences of this had not been taken into account by the classical school. Keynes proposed a 'second postulate of classical economics' asserting that the wage is equal to the marginal disutility of labour. This is an instance of wages being fixed in real terms. He attributes the second postulate to the classics subject to the qualification that unemployment may result from wages being fixed by legislation, collective bargaining, or 'mere human obstinacy' (p6), all of which are likely to fix wages in money terms. Keynes's economic theory
1922-405: The contrary, the mere definition of the rate of interest tells us in so many words that the rate of interest is the reward for parting with liquidity for a specified period. To which Jacob Viner retorted that: By analogous reasoning he could deny that wages are the reward for labor, or that profit is the reward for risk-taking, because labor is sometimes done without anticipation or realization of
New Economics - Misplaced Pages Continue
1984-430: The course of the next ten years — the way the world thinks about its economic problems. I can't expect you, or anyone else, to believe this at the present stage. But for myself I don't merely hope what I say,— in my own mind, I'm quite sure. The first chapter of The General Theory (only half a page long) has a similarly radical tone: I have called this book the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , placing
2046-494: The current distinction between micro- and macroeconomics . Of particular importance in Keynes' theories was his explanation of economic behavior as also being led by "animal spirits". In this sense, it limited the role for the so-called rational (maximizing) agent. The Post-World War II period saw the widespread implementation of Keynesian economic policy in the United States and Western European countries. Its dominance in
2108-489: The disjuncture between microeconomic behavior and macroeconomic results, as indicated by Alan Kirman . The concept of rational expectations was originally used by John Muth , and was popularized by Lucas. One of the most famous new classical models is the real business cycle model, developed by Edward C. Prescott and Finn E. Kydland . It turned out that pure new classical models had low explanatory and predictive power. The models could not simultaneously explain both
2170-433: The duration and magnitude of actual cycles. Additionally, the model's key result that only unexpected changes in money can affect the business cycle and unemployment did not stand empirical tests. The mainstream turned to the new neoclassical synthesis . Most economists, even most new classical economists, accepted the new Keynesian notion that for several reasons wages and prices do not move quickly and smoothly to
2232-518: The emerging global markets left traditional Keynesian schools struggling to reconcile the Phillips curve with the current economic conditions, which ruled out concurrent high inflation and high unemployment. The New Classical school emerged in the 1970s as a response to what were perceived as failures of Keynesian economics to explain stagflation. New Classical and monetarist criticisms led by Robert Lucas, Jr. and Milton Friedman respectively forced
2294-409: The emphasis on the prefix general . The object of such a title is to contrast the character of my arguments and conclusions with those of the classical theory of the subject, upon which I was brought up and which dominates the economic thought, both practical and theoretical, of the governing and academic classes of this generation, as it has for a hundred years past. I shall argue that the postulates of
2356-461: The end of the chapter on the multiplier, he uses his much quoted "digging holes" metaphor, against laissez-faire . In his provocation Keynes argues that "If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig
2418-492: The existence of distortions impeding transition to equilibrium. The classical position had generally been to view the distortions as the culprit and to argue that their removal was the main tool for eliminating unemployment. Keynes on the other hand viewed the market distortions as part of the economic fabric and advocated different policy measures which (as a separate consideration) had social consequences which he personally found congenial and which he expected his readers to see in
2480-403: The factors influencing their demands, play an important role in Keynes's model. Saving and investment are considered to be necessarily equal for reasons set out in Chapter 6 which looks at economic aggregates from the viewpoint of manufacturers. The discussion is intricate, considering matters such as the depreciation of machinery, but is summarised on p. 63: Provided it is agreed that income
2542-475: The facts of experience. Keynes's main theory (including its dynamic elements) is presented in Chapters 2-15, 18, and 22, which are summarised here. A shorter account will be found in the article on Keynesian economics . The remaining chapters of Keynes's book contain amplifications of various sorts and are described later in this article . The first book of The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
New Economics - Misplaced Pages Continue
2604-523: The field by the 1970s was best reflected by the controversial statement attributed to US President Richard Nixon and economist Milton Friedman : " We are all Keynesians now ". Problems arose during the 1973–75 recession which was largely triggered by the 1973 oil crisis . The nascent classical economists ignored the broader global economic conditions of the time in favor of targeting Keynesian policy responses for continued unemployment , high inflation and stagnant economic growth— stagflation . Conversely,
2666-426: The future, modified only to the extent that we have more or less definite reasons for expecting a change. He goes on thus: ‘In practice we have tacitly agreed, as a rule, to fall back on what is, in truth, a convention ’. He notes that ‘our existing knowledge does not provide a sufficient basis for a calculated mathematical expectation.’ ‘Nevertheless the above conventional method of calculation will be compatible with
2728-445: The inducement to invest, with the key ideas being presented in Chapter 11. The 'marginal efficiency of capital' is defined as the annual revenue which is expected to be yielded by an extra increment of capital as a proportion of its cost. The 'schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital' is the function which, for any rate of interest r, gives us the level of investment which will take place if all opportunities are accepted whose return
2790-490: The interest rate from income in classical theory . Keynes is seeking to reverse the direction of causality (and omitting r as an argument to S()). He interprets the schedule as expressing the demand for investment at any given value of r, giving it an alternative name: "We shall call this the investment demand-schedule..." (p136). He also refers to it as the 'demand curve for capital' (p178). For fixed industrial conditions, we conclude that 'the amount of investment... depends on
2852-399: The interest rate r on the relative attractiveness of saving and consumption, but regards it as 'complex and uncertain' and leaves it out as a parameter. His seemingly innocent definitions embody an assumption whose consequences will be considered later . Since Y is measured in wage units, the proportion of income saved is considered to be unaffected by the change in real income resulting from
2914-464: The lack of downwards flexibility of wages by constructing an economic model in which the money supply and wage rates were externally determined (the latter in money terms), and in which the main variables were fixed by the equilibrium conditions of various markets in the presence of these facts. Many of the quantities of interest, such as income and consumption, are monetary. Keynes often expresses such quantities in wage units (Chapter 4): to be precise,
2976-433: The late 19th century, led by Carl Menger , William Stanley Jevons , and Léon Walras , gave rise to what is known as neoclassical economics . This neoclassical formulation had also been formalized by Alfred Marshall . However, it was the general equilibrium of Walras that helped solidify the research in economic science as a mathematical and deductive enterprise, the essence of which is still neoclassical and makes up what
3038-517: The marginal propensity to consume is 90%, then 'the multiplier k is 10; and the total employment caused by (e.g.) increased public works will be ten times the employment caused by the public works themselves' (pp116f). Formally Keynes writes the multiplier as k=1/S'(Y). It follows from his 'fundamental psychological law' that k will be greater than 1. Keynes's account is not clear until his economic system has been fully set out (see below ). In Chapter 10 he describes his multiplier as being related to
3100-401: The most serviceable reform available, with a view to mitigating the predominance of speculation over enterprise in the United States.’ To account for the apparent ‘foolishness’ on which economic progress seemed to rely, Keynes suggests that: Most, probably, of our decisions to do something positive, the full consequences of which will be drawn out over many days to come, can only be taken as
3162-468: The one introduced by R. F. Kahn in 1931. The mechanism of Kahn's multiplier lies in an infinite series of transactions, each conceived of as creating employment: if you spend a certain amount of money, then the recipient will spend a proportion of what he or she receives, the second recipient will spend a further proportion again, and so forth. Keynes's account of his own mechanism (in the second para of p. 117) makes no reference to infinite series. By
SECTION 50
#17327723220733224-444: The operation of a market economy. If there is unemployment (and if there are no distortions preventing the employment market from adjusting to it) then there will be workers willing to offer their labour at less than the current wage levels, leading to downward pressure on wages and increased offers of jobs. The classics held that full employment was the equilibrium condition of an undistorted labour market, but they and Keynes agreed in
3286-409: The price which a manufacturer can expect to get for his "finished" output at the time when he commits himself (sic) to starting the process which will produce it'. Long-term expectation 'is concerned with what the entrepreneur can hope to earn in the shape of future returns if he (sic) purchases (or perhaps manufactures) "finished" output as an addition to his capital equipment.' Keynes note that:'It
3348-411: The propensity to consume, which is introduced in Chapter 8 as the desired level of expenditure on consumption (for an individual or aggregated over an economy). The demand for consumer goods depends chiefly on the income Y and may be written functionally as C(Y). Saving is that part of income which is not consumed, so the propensity to save S(Y) is equal to Y–C(Y). Keynes discusses the possible influence of
3410-456: The rate of interest already performs another function in the economy, that of equating demand and supply of money, and that it cannot adjust to maintain two separate equilibria. In his view it is the monetary role which wins out. This is why Keynes's theory is a theory of money as much as of employment: the monetary economy of interest and liquidity interacts with the real economy of production, investment and consumption. Keynes sought to allow for
3472-422: The rate of interest' as John Hicks put it in ' Mr. Keynes and the "Classics" '. In Chapter 12, Keynes writes: It would be foolish, in forming our expectations, to attach great weight to matters which are very uncertain. [Footnote: By “very uncertain’ I do not mean the same thing as improbable”. Cf. my Treatise on Probability , chap. 6, on “The Weight of Arguments”.] It is reasonable, therefore, to be guided to
3534-424: The relation between the present and the future level of income' (p95). The marginal propensity to consume , C'(Y), is the gradient of the purple curve, and the marginal propensity to save S'(Y) is equal to 1–C'(Y). Keynes states as a 'fundamental psychological law' (p96) that the marginal propensity to consume will be positive and less than unity. Chapter 10 introduces the famous 'multiplier' through an example: if
3596-459: The relation between the return available to capital and the interest rate. The economy needs to find its way to an equilibrium in which no more money is being saved than will be invested, and this can be accomplished by contraction of income and a consequent reduction in the level of employment. In the classical scheme it is the interest rate rather than income which adjusts to maintain equilibrium between saving and investment; but Keynes asserts that
3658-442: The same light. The distortions which have prevented wage levels from adapting downwards have lain in employment contracts being expressed in monetary terms; in various forms of legislation such as the minimum wage and in state-supplied benefits; in the unwillingness of workers to accept reductions in their income; and in their ability through unionisation to resist the market forces exerting downward pressure on them. Keynes accepted
3720-430: The theoretical foundation for much of contemporary mainstream economics. The new classical perspective takes root in three diagnostic sources of fluctuations in growth: the productivity wedge, the capital wedge, and the labor wedge. Through the neoclassical perspective and business cycle accounting one can look at the diagnostics and find the main ‘culprits’ for fluctuations in the real economy. New classical economics
3782-555: The title New Economics . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Economics&oldid=753169454 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages New classical macroeconomics New classical macroeconomics , sometimes simply called new classical economics ,
SECTION 60
#17327723220733844-542: The values needed for long-run equilibrium between quantities supplied and demanded. Therefore, they also accept the monetarist and new Keynesian view that monetary policy can have a considerable effect in the short run . The new classical macroeconomics contributed the rational expectations hypothesis and the idea of intertemporal optimisation to new Keynesian economics and the new neoclassical synthesis. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
#72927