Misplaced Pages

#624375

107-510: The Caleb was originally designed as a fast-response orbital launch system, to place small reconnaissance satellites , and other military payloads, into orbit at short notice. The orbital configurations were four-stage vehicles, whilst test launches used one- and two-stage configurations. The project was cancelled due to pressure from the United States Air Force , who were responsible for all other orbital launches conducted by

214-422: A complex Fourier series ; therefore, with a large number of epicycles, very complex paths can be represented in the complex plane . Let the complex number where a 0 and k 0 are constants, i = √ −1 is the imaginary unit , and t is time, correspond to a deferent centered on the origin of the complex plane and revolving with a radius a 0 and angular velocity where T

321-404: A body is proportional to the product of the masses of the two attracting bodies and decreases inversely with the square of the distance between them. To this Newtonian approximation, for a system of two-point masses or spherical bodies, only influenced by their mutual gravitation (called a two-body problem ), their trajectories can be exactly calculated. If the heavier body is much more massive than

428-427: A certain time called the period. This motion is described by the empirical laws of Kepler, which can be mathematically derived from Newton's laws. These can be formulated as follows: Note that while bound orbits of a point mass or a spherical body with a Newtonian gravitational field are closed ellipses , which repeat the same path exactly and indefinitely, any non-spherical or non-Newtonian effects (such as caused by

535-402: A more accurate calculation and understanding of the exact mechanics of orbital motion. Historically, the apparent motions of the planets were described by European and Arabic philosophers using the idea of celestial spheres . This model posited the existence of perfect moving spheres or rings to which the stars and planets were attached. It assumed the heavens were fixed apart from the motion of

642-420: A practical sense, both of these trajectory types mean the object is "breaking free" of the planet's gravity, and "going off into space" never to return. In most situations, relativistic effects can be neglected, and Newton's laws give a sufficiently accurate description of motion. The acceleration of a body is equal to the sum of the forces acting on it, divided by its mass, and the gravitational force acting on

749-498: A preliminary unpublished sketch called the Commentariolus . By the time he published De revolutionibus orbium coelestium , he had added more circles. Counting the total number is difficult, but estimates are that he created a system just as complicated, or even more so. Koestler, in his history of man's vision of the universe, equates the number of epicycles used by Copernicus at 48. The popular total of about 80 circles for

856-410: A single point called the barycenter. The paths of all the star's satellites are elliptical orbits about that barycenter. Each satellite in that system will have its own elliptical orbit with the barycenter at one focal point of that ellipse. At any point along its orbit, any satellite will have a certain value of kinetic and potential energy with respect to the barycenter, and the sum of those two energies

963-415: A solar eclipse (585 BC), or Heraclides Ponticus . They also saw the "wanderers" or "planetai" (our planets ). The regularity in the motions of the wandering bodies suggested that their positions might be predictable. The most obvious approach to the problem of predicting the motions of the heavenly bodies was simply to map their positions against the star field and then to fit mathematical functions to

1070-588: A system that employs elliptical rather than circular orbits. Kepler's three laws are still taught today in university physics and astronomy classes, and the wording of these laws has not changed since Kepler first formulated them four hundred years ago. The apparent motion of the heavenly bodies with respect to time is cyclical in nature. Apollonius of Perga (3rd century BC) realized that this cyclical variation could be represented visually by small circular orbits, or epicycles , revolving on larger circular orbits, or deferents . Hipparchus (2nd century BC) calculated

1177-491: A technical sense—they are describing a portion of an elliptical path around the center of gravity—but the orbits are interrupted by striking the Earth. If the cannonball is fired with sufficient speed, the ground curves away from the ball at least as much as the ball falls—so the ball never strikes the ground. It is now in what could be called a non-interrupted or circumnavigating, orbit. For any specific combination of height above

SECTION 10

#1732779956625

1284-465: A theory to make its predictions match the facts. There is a generally accepted idea that extra epicycles were invented to alleviate the growing errors that the Ptolemaic system noted as measurements became more accurate, particularly for Mars. According to this notion, epicycles are regarded by some as the paradigmatic example of bad science. Copernicus added an extra epicycle to his planets, but that

1391-415: A thousand years after Ptolemy's original work was published. When Copernicus transformed Earth-based observations to heliocentric coordinates, he was confronted with an entirely new problem. The Sun-centered positions displayed a cyclical motion with respect to time but without retrograde loops in the case of the outer planets. In principle, the heliocentric motion was simpler but with new subtleties due to

1498-528: A time. This is not to say that he believed the planets were all equidistant, but he had no basis on which to measure distances, except for the Moon. He generally ordered the planets outward from the Earth based on their orbit periods. Later he calculated their distances in the Planetary Hypotheses and summarized them in the first column of this table: Had his values for deferent radii relative to

1605-505: Is a constant value at every point along its orbit. As a result, as a planet approaches periapsis , the planet will increase in speed as its potential energy decreases; as a planet approaches apoapsis , its velocity will decrease as its potential energy increases. There are a few common ways of understanding orbits: The velocity relationship of two moving objects with mass can thus be considered in four practical classes, with subtypes: Orbital rockets are launched vertically at first to lift

1712-528: Is a convenient approximation to take the center of mass as coinciding with the center of the more massive body. Advances in Newtonian mechanics were then used to explore variations from the simple assumptions behind Kepler orbits, such as the perturbations due to other bodies, or the impact of spheroidal rather than spherical bodies. Joseph-Louis Lagrange developed a new approach to Newtonian mechanics emphasizing energy more than force, and made progress on

1819-407: Is adopted of taking the potential energy as zero at infinite separation, the bound orbits will have negative total energy, the parabolic trajectories zero total energy, and hyperbolic orbits positive total energy. An open orbit will have a parabolic shape if it has the velocity of exactly the escape velocity at that point in its trajectory, and it will have the shape of a hyperbola when its velocity

1926-464: Is also a vector. Because our basis vector r ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {r} }}} moves as the object orbits, we start by differentiating it. From time t {\displaystyle t} to t + δ t {\displaystyle t+\delta t} , the vector r ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {r} }}} keeps its beginning at

2033-460: Is considered as established, because thereby the sensible appearances of the heavenly movements can be explained; not, however, as if this proof were sufficient, forasmuch as some other theory might explain them. Being a system that was for the most part used to justify the geocentric model, with the exception of Copernicus' cosmos, the deferent and epicycle model was favored over the heliocentric ideas that Kepler and Galileo proposed. Later adopters of

2140-404: Is greater than the escape velocity. When bodies with escape velocity or greater approach each other, they will briefly curve around each other at the time of their closest approach, and then separate, forever. All closed orbits have the shape of an ellipse . A circular orbit is a special case, wherein the foci of the ellipse coincide. The point where the orbiting body is closest to Earth is called

2247-581: Is located in the plane using vector calculus in polar coordinates both with the standard Euclidean basis and with the polar basis with the origin coinciding with the center of force. Let r {\displaystyle r} be the distance between the object and the center and θ {\displaystyle \theta } be the angle it has rotated. Let x ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {x} }}} and y ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {y} }}} be

SECTION 20

#1732779956625

2354-441: Is no bilaterally-symmetrical, nor eccentrically-periodic curve used in any branch of astrophysics or observational astronomy which could not be smoothly plotted as the resultant motion of a point turning within a constellation of epicycles, finite in number, revolving around a fixed deferent. Any path—periodic or not, closed or open—can be represented with an infinite number of epicycles. This is because epicycles can be represented as

2461-524: Is that historians examining books on Ptolemaic astronomy from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance have found absolutely no trace of multiple epicycles being used for each planet. The Alfonsine Tables, for instance, were apparently computed using Ptolemy's original unadorned methods. Another problem is that the models themselves discouraged tinkering. In a deferent-and-epicycle model, the parts of

2568-402: Is that it was able to account for the remaining unexplained amount in precession of Mercury's perihelion first noted by Le Verrier. However, Newton's solution is still used for most short term purposes since it is significantly easier to use and sufficiently accurate. Within a planetary system , planets, dwarf planets , asteroids and other minor planets , comets , and space debris orbit

2675-405: Is the period . If z 1 is the path of an epicycle, then the deferent plus epicycle is represented as the sum This is an almost periodic function , and is a periodic function just when the ratio of the constants k j is rational . Generalizing to N epicycles yields the almost periodic function which is periodic just when every pair of k j is rationally related. Finding

2782-462: Is the curved trajectory of an object such as the trajectory of a planet around a star, or of a natural satellite around a planet, or of an artificial satellite around an object or position in space such as a planet, moon, asteroid, or Lagrange point . Normally, orbit refers to a regularly repeating trajectory, although it may also refer to a non-repeating trajectory. To a close approximation, planets and satellites follow elliptic orbits , with

2889-464: The apoapsis is that point at which they are the farthest. (More specific terms are used for specific bodies. For example, perigee and apogee are the lowest and highest parts of an orbit around Earth, while perihelion and aphelion are the closest and farthest points of an orbit around the Sun.) In the case of planets orbiting a star, the mass of the star and all its satellites are calculated to be at

2996-450: The center of mass being orbited at a focal point of the ellipse, as described by Kepler's laws of planetary motion . For most situations, orbital motion is adequately approximated by Newtonian mechanics , which explains gravity as a force obeying an inverse-square law . However, Albert Einstein 's general theory of relativity , which accounts for gravity as due to curvature of spacetime , with orbits following geodesics , provides

3103-467: The eccentricities of the planetary orbits vary over time. Mercury , the smallest planet in the Solar System, has the most eccentric orbit. At the present epoch , Mars has the next largest eccentricity while the smallest orbital eccentricities are seen with Venus and Neptune . As two objects orbit each other, the periapsis is that point at which the two objects are closest to each other and

3210-477: The heliocentric model did not exist in Ptolemy 's time and would not come around for over fifteen hundred years after his time. Furthermore, Aristotelian physics was not designed with these sorts of calculations in mind, and Aristotle 's philosophy regarding the heavens was entirely at odds with the concept of heliocentrism. It was not until Galileo Galilei observed the moons of Jupiter on 7 January 1610, and

3317-453: The perigee , and when orbiting a body other than earth it is called the periapsis (less properly, "perifocus" or "pericentron"). The point where the satellite is farthest from Earth is called the apogee , apoapsis, or sometimes apifocus or apocentron. A line drawn from periapsis to apoapsis is the line-of-apsides . This is the major axis of the ellipse, the line through its longest part. Bodies following closed orbits repeat their paths with

NOTS-EV-2 Caleb - Misplaced Pages Continue

3424-737: The three-body problem , discovering the Lagrangian points . In a dramatic vindication of classical mechanics, in 1846 Urbain Le Verrier was able to predict the position of Neptune based on unexplained perturbations in the orbit of Uranus . Albert Einstein in his 1916 paper The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity explained that gravity was due to curvature of space-time and removed Newton's assumption that changes in gravity propagate instantaneously. This led astronomers to recognize that Newtonian mechanics did not provide

3531-446: The three-body problem ; however, it converges too slowly to be of much use. Except for special cases like the Lagrangian points , no method is known to solve the equations of motion for a system with four or more bodies. Rather than an exact closed form solution, orbits with many bodies can be approximated with arbitrarily high accuracy. These approximations take two forms: Differential simulations with large numbers of objects perform

3638-400: The 13th century, wrote: Reason may be employed in two ways to establish a point: firstly, for the purpose of furnishing sufficient proof of some principle [...]. Reason is employed in another way, not as furnishing a sufficient proof of a principle, but as confirming an already established principle, by showing the congruity of its results, as in astronomy the theory of eccentrics and epicycles

3745-578: The 13th century. (Alfonso is credited with commissioning the Alfonsine Tables .) By this time each planet had been provided with from 40 to 60 epicycles to represent after a fashion its complex movement among the stars. Amazed at the difficulty of the project, Alfonso is credited with the remark that had he been present at the Creation he might have given excellent advice. As it turns out, a major difficulty with this epicycles-on-epicycles theory

3852-457: The Earth and the Sun. When ancient astronomers viewed the sky, they saw the Sun, Moon, and stars moving overhead in a regular fashion. Babylonians did celestial observations, mainly of the Sun and Moon as a means of recalibrating and preserving timekeeping for religious ceremonies. Other early civilizations such as the Greeks had thinkers like Thales of Miletus , the first to document and predict

3959-410: The Earth at the point half an orbit beyond, and directly opposite the firing point, below the circular orbit. At a specific horizontal firing speed called escape velocity , dependent on the mass of the planet and the distance of the object from the barycenter, an open orbit (E) is achieved that has a parabolic path . At even greater speeds the object will follow a range of hyperbolic trajectories . In

4066-417: The Earth was where they stood and observed the sky, and it is the sky which appears to move while the ground seems still and steady underfoot. Some Greek astronomers (e.g., Aristarchus of Samos ) speculated that the planets (Earth included) orbited the Sun, but the optics (and the specific mathematics – Isaac Newton 's law of gravitation for example) necessary to provide data that would convincingly support

4173-472: The Earth–Sun distance been more accurate, the epicycle sizes would have all approached the Earth–Sun distance. Although all the planets are considered separately, in one peculiar way they were all linked: the lines drawn from the body through the epicentric center of all the planets were all parallel, along with the line drawn from the Sun to the Earth along which Mercury and Venus were situated. That means that all

4280-518: The Moon's Motion which employed an epicycle and remained in use in China into the nineteenth century. Subsequent tables based on Newton's Theory could have approached arcminute accuracy. According to one school of thought in the history of astronomy, minor imperfections in the original Ptolemaic system were discovered through observations accumulated over time. It was mistakenly believed that more levels of epicycles (circles within circles) were added to

4387-431: The Moon, moving faster at perigee and slower at apogee than circular orbits would, using four gears, two of them engaged in an eccentric way that quite closely approximates Kepler's second law . Epicycles worked very well and were highly accurate, because, as Fourier analysis later showed, any smooth curve can be approximated to arbitrary accuracy with a sufficient number of epicycles. However, they fell out of favor with

NOTS-EV-2 Caleb - Misplaced Pages Continue

4494-427: The Ptolemaic system seems to have appeared in 1898. It may have been inspired by the non-Ptolemaic system of Girolamo Fracastoro , who used either 77 or 79 orbs in his system inspired by Eudoxus of Cnidus . Copernicus in his works exaggerated the number of epicycles used in the Ptolemaic system; although original counts ranged to 80 circles, by Copernicus's time the Ptolemaic system had been updated by Peurbach toward

4601-580: The Sun are proportional to the squares of their orbital periods. Jupiter and Venus, for example, are respectively about 5.2 and 0.723 AU distant from the Sun, their orbital periods respectively about 11.86 and 0.615 years. The proportionality is seen by the fact that the ratio for Jupiter, 5.2 /11.86 , is practically equal to that for Venus, 0.723 /0.615 , in accord with the relationship. Idealised orbits meeting these rules are known as Kepler orbits . Isaac Newton demonstrated that Kepler's laws were derivable from his theory of gravitation and that, in general,

4708-420: The Sun is not located at the center of the orbits, but rather at one focus . Second, he found that the orbital speed of each planet is not constant, as had previously been thought, but rather that the speed depends on the planet's distance from the Sun. Third, Kepler found a universal relationship between the orbital properties of all the planets orbiting the Sun. For the planets, the cubes of their distances from

4815-528: The US military, and no attempts to launch the vehicle into orbit were made. Caleb was an air-launched rocket , with its two launches being conducted from F4D Skyray #747, the same aircraft used in the Pilot trials. Hi-Hoe was also air-launched. It was released from an F4H Phantom II , which provided greater performance. SIP launches were conducted from a ground launch pad on San Nicolas Island . The aircraft used for

4922-403: The accelerations in the radial and transverse directions. As said, Newton gives this first due to gravity is − μ / r 2 {\displaystyle -\mu /r^{2}} and the second is zero. Equation (2) can be rearranged using integration by parts. We can multiply through by r {\displaystyle r} because it is not zero unless

5029-465: The airborne launches took off from Point Arguello , which later became part of Vandenberg Air Force Base , currently Vandenberg Space Force Base . The Caleb made its maiden flight, in a single-stage test configuration, on 28 July 1960. Its second flight was made on 24 October of the same year, and used a two-stage configuration. It was unsuccessful, due to the second stage's failure to ignite. Both test launches were suborbital . Both SIP launches used

5136-534: The angle of the epicycle is not a linear function of the angle of the deferent. In the Hipparchian system the epicycle rotated and revolved along the deferent with uniform motion. However, Ptolemy found that he could not reconcile that with the Babylonian observational data available to him; in particular, the shape and size of the apparent retrogrades differed. The angular rate at which the epicycle traveled

5243-462: The atmosphere, in an act commonly referred to as an aerobraking maneuver. As an illustration of an orbit around a planet, the Newton's cannonball model may prove useful (see image below). This is a ' thought experiment ', in which a cannon on top of a tall mountain is able to fire a cannonball horizontally at any chosen muzzle speed. The effects of air friction on the cannonball are ignored (or perhaps

5350-435: The bodies revolve in their epicycles in lockstep with Ptolemy's Sun (that is, they all have exactly a one-year period). Babylonian observations showed that for superior planets the planet would typically move through in the night sky slower than the stars. Each night the planet appeared to lag a little behind the stars, in what is called prograde motion . Near opposition , the planet would appear to reverse and move through

5457-466: The calculations in a hierarchical pairwise fashion between centers of mass. Using this scheme, galaxies, star clusters and other large assemblages of objects have been simulated. The following derivation applies to such an elliptical orbit. We start only with the Newtonian law of gravitation stating that the gravitational acceleration towards the central body is related to the inverse of the square of

SECTION 50

#1732779956625

5564-517: The center of gravity and mass of the planet, there is one specific firing speed (unaffected by the mass of the ball, which is assumed to be very small relative to the Earth's mass) that produces a circular orbit , as shown in (C). As the firing speed is increased beyond this, non-interrupted elliptic orbits are produced; one is shown in (D). If the initial firing is above the surface of the Earth as shown, there will also be non-interrupted elliptical orbits at slower firing speed; these will come closest to

5671-465: The center of the circular deferents that distinguished the Ptolemaic system. For the outer planets, the angle between the center of the epicycle and the planet was the same as the angle between the Earth and the Sun. Ptolemy did not predict the relative sizes of the planetary deferents in the Almagest . All of his calculations were done with respect to a normalized deferent, considering a single case at

5778-417: The changing positions. The introduction of better celestial measurement instruments, such as the introduction of the gnomon by Anaximander, allowed the Greeks to have a better understanding of the passage of time, such as the number of days in a year and the length of seasons, which are indispensable for astronomic measurements. The ancients worked from a geocentric perspective for the simple reason that

5885-489: The circle', meaning "circle moving on another circle") was a geometric model used to explain the variations in speed and direction of the apparent motion of the Moon , Sun , and planets . In particular it explained the apparent retrograde motion of the five planets known at the time. Secondarily, it also explained changes in the apparent distances of the planets from the Earth. It was first proposed by Apollonius of Perga at

5992-522: The coefficients a j to represent a time-dependent path in the complex plane , z = f ( t ) , is the goal of reproducing an orbit with deferent and epicycles, and this is a way of " saving the phenomena " (σώζειν τα φαινόμενα). This parallel was noted by Giovanni Schiaparelli . Pertinent to the Copernican Revolution 's debate about " saving the phenomena " versus offering explanations, one can understand why Thomas Aquinas , in

6099-459: The coordinate system at the center of the mass of the system. Energy is associated with gravitational fields . A stationary body far from another can do external work if it is pulled towards it, and therefore has gravitational potential energy . Since work is required to separate two bodies against the pull of gravity, their gravitational potential energy increases as they are separated, and decreases as they approach one another. For point masses,

6206-432: The discovery that planetary motions were largely elliptical from a heliocentric frame of reference , which led to the discovery that gravity obeying a simple inverse square law could better explain all planetary motions. In both Hipparchian and Ptolemaic systems, the planets are assumed to move in a small circle called an epicycle , which in turn moves along a larger circle called a deferent (Ptolemy himself described

6313-683: The distance r {\displaystyle r} of the orbiting object from the center as a function of its angle θ {\displaystyle \theta } . However, it is easier to introduce the auxiliary variable u = 1 / r {\displaystyle u=1/r} and to express u {\displaystyle u} as a function of θ {\displaystyle \theta } . Derivatives of r {\displaystyle r} with respect to time may be rewritten as derivatives of u {\displaystyle u} with respect to angle. Plugging these into (1) gives So for

6420-434: The distance between them, namely where F 2 is the force acting on the mass m 2 caused by the gravitational attraction mass m 1 has for m 2 , G is the universal gravitational constant, and r is the distance between the two masses centers. From Newton's Second Law, the summation of the forces acting on m 2 related to that body's acceleration: where A 2 is the acceleration of m 2 caused by

6527-521: The end of the 3rd century BC. It was developed by Apollonius of Perga and Hipparchus of Rhodes, who used it extensively, during the 2nd century BC, then formalized and extensively used by Ptolemy in his 2nd century AD astronomical treatise the Almagest . Epicyclical motion is used in the Antikythera mechanism , an ancient Greek astronomical device, for compensating for the elliptical orbit of

SECTION 60

#1732779956625

6634-428: The entire analysis can be done separately in these dimensions. This results in the harmonic parabolic equations x = A cos ⁡ ( t ) {\displaystyle x=A\cos(t)} and y = B sin ⁡ ( t ) {\displaystyle y=B\sin(t)} of the ellipse. The location of the orbiting object at the current time t {\displaystyle t}

6741-459: The epicyclic model such as Tycho Brahe , who considered the Church's scriptures when creating his model, were seen even more favorably. The Tychonic model was a hybrid model that blended the geocentric and heliocentric characteristics, with a still Earth that has the sun and moon surrounding it, and the planets orbiting the Sun. To Brahe, the idea of a revolving and moving Earth was impossible, and

6848-408: The force of gravitational attraction F 2 of m 1 acting on m 2 . Combining Eq. 1 and 2: Solving for the acceleration, A 2 : where μ {\displaystyle \mu \,} is the standard gravitational parameter , in this case G m 1 {\displaystyle Gm_{1}} . It is understood that the system being described is m 2 , hence

6955-417: The gravitational energy decreases to zero as they approach zero separation. It is convenient and conventional to assign the potential energy as having zero value when they are an infinite distance apart, and hence it has a negative value (since it decreases from zero) for smaller finite distances. When only two gravitational bodies interact, their orbits follow a conic section . The orbit can be open (implying

7062-524: The gravitational force – or, more generally, for any inverse square force law – the right hand side of the equation becomes a constant and the equation is seen to be the harmonic equation (up to a shift of origin of the dependent variable). The solution is: Deferent and epicycle In the Hipparchian , Ptolemaic , and Copernican systems of astronomy , the epicycle (from Ancient Greek ἐπίκυκλος ( epíkuklos )  'upon

7169-490: The highest accuracy in understanding orbits. In relativity theory , orbits follow geodesic trajectories which are usually approximated very well by the Newtonian predictions (except where there are very strong gravity fields and very high speeds) but the differences are measurable. Essentially all the experimental evidence that can distinguish between the theories agrees with relativity theory to within experimental measurement accuracy. The original vindication of general relativity

7276-436: The models to match more accurately the observed planetary motions. The multiplication of epicycles is believed to have led to a nearly unworkable system by the 16th century, and that Copernicus created his heliocentric system in order to simplify the Ptolemaic astronomy of his day, thus succeeding in drastically reducing the number of circles. With better observations additional epicycles and eccentrics were used to represent

7383-466: The more realistic n-body problem required numerical methods for solution. The power of Newtonian mechanics to solve problems in orbital mechanics is illustrated by the discovery of Neptune . Analysis of observed perturbations in the orbit of Uranus produced estimates of the suspected planet's position within a degree of where it was found. This could not have been accomplished with deferent/epicycle methods. Still, Newton in 1702 published Theory of

7490-442: The motions of the planets. The empirical methodology he developed proved to be extraordinarily accurate for its day and was still in use at the time of Copernicus and Kepler. A heliocentric model is not necessarily more accurate as a system to track and predict the movements of celestial bodies than a geocentric one when considering strictly circular orbits. A heliocentric system would require more intricate systems to compensate for

7597-504: The mountain is high enough that the cannon is above the Earth's atmosphere, which is the same thing). If the cannon fires its ball with a low initial speed, the trajectory of the ball curves downward and hits the ground (A). As the firing speed is increased, the cannonball hits the ground farther (B) away from the cannon, because while the ball is still falling towards the ground, the ground is increasingly curving away from it (see first point, above). All these motions are actually "orbits" in

7704-427: The need for deferent/epicycle methods altogether and produced more accurate theories. By treating the Sun and planets as point masses and using Newton's law of universal gravitation , equations of motion were derived that could be solved by various means to compute predictions of planetary orbital velocities and positions. If approximated as simple two-body problems , for example, they could be solved analytically, while

7811-572: The newly observed phenomena till in the later Middle Ages the universe became a 'Sphere/With Centric and Eccentric scribbled o'er,/Cycle and Epicycle, Orb in Orb'. As a measure of complexity, the number of circles is given as 80 for Ptolemy, versus a mere 34 for Copernicus. The highest number appeared in the Encyclopædia Britannica on Astronomy during the 1960s, in a discussion of King Alfonso X of Castile 's interest in astronomy during

7918-427: The night sky faster than the stars for a time in retrograde motion before reversing again and resuming prograde. Epicyclic theory, in part, sought to explain this behavior. The inferior planets were always observed to be near the Sun, appearing only shortly before sunrise or shortly after sunset. Their apparent retrograde motion occurs during the transition between evening star into morning star, as they pass between

8025-469: The now-lost astronomical system of Ibn Bajjah in 12th century Andalusian Spain lacked epicycles. Gersonides of 14th century France also eliminated epicycles, arguing that they did not align with his observations. Despite these alternative models, epicycles were not eliminated until the 17th century, when Johannes Kepler's model of elliptical orbits gradually replaced Copernicus' model based on perfect circles. Newtonian or classical mechanics eliminated

8132-513: The numbers by more than two degrees. Saturn is surpassed by the numbers by one and a half degrees." Using modern computer programs, Gingerich discovered that, at the time of the conjunction, Saturn indeed lagged behind the tables by a degree and a half and Mars led the predictions by nearly two degrees. Moreover, he found that Ptolemy's predictions for Jupiter at the same time were quite accurate. Copernicus and his contemporaries were therefore using Ptolemy's methods and finding them trustworthy well over

8239-410: The object never returns) or closed (returning). Which it is depends on the total energy ( kinetic + potential energy ) of the system. In the case of an open orbit, the speed at any position of the orbit is at least the escape velocity for that position, in the case of a closed orbit, the speed is always less than the escape velocity. Since the kinetic energy is never negative if the common convention

8346-498: The orbiting object crashes. Then having the derivative be zero gives that the function is a constant. which is actually the theoretical proof of Kepler's second law (A line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time). The constant of integration, h , is the angular momentum per unit mass . In order to get an equation for the orbit from equation (1), we need to eliminate time. (See also Binet equation .) In polar coordinates, this would express

8453-411: The orbits of bodies subject to gravity were conic sections (this assumes that the force of gravity propagates instantaneously). Newton showed that, for a pair of bodies, the orbits' sizes are in inverse proportion to their masses , and that those bodies orbit their common center of mass . Where one body is much more massive than the other (as is the case of an artificial satellite orbiting a planet), it

8560-421: The origin and rotates from angle θ {\displaystyle \theta } to θ + θ ˙   δ t {\displaystyle \theta +{\dot {\theta }}\ \delta t} which moves its head a distance θ ˙   δ t {\displaystyle {\dot {\theta }}\ \delta t} in

8667-627: The perpendicular direction θ ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}} giving a derivative of θ ˙ θ ^ {\displaystyle {\dot {\theta }}{\hat {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}} . We can now find the velocity and acceleration of our orbiting object. The coefficients of r ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {r} }}} and θ ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}} give

8774-545: The phases of Venus in September 1610, that the heliocentric model began to receive broad support among astronomers, who also came to accept the notion that the planets are individual worlds orbiting the Sun (that is, that the Earth is a planet, too). Johannes Kepler formulated his three laws of planetary motion , which describe the orbits of the planets in the Solar System to a remarkable degree of accuracy utilizing

8881-442: The planets actually orbited the Sun. Ptolemy's and Copernicus' theories proved the durability and adaptability of the deferent/epicycle device for representing planetary motion. The deferent/epicycle models worked as well as they did because of the extraordinary orbital stability of the solar system. Either theory could be used today had Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Isaac Newton not invented calculus . According to Maimonides ,

8988-403: The planets were different, and so it was with Copernicus' initial models. As he worked through the mathematics, however, Copernicus discovered that his models could be combined in a unified system. Furthermore, if they were scaled so that the Earth's orbit was the same in all of them, the ordering of the planets we recognize today easily followed from the math. Mercury orbited closest to the Sun and

9095-512: The point but did not give it a name ). Both circles rotate eastward and are roughly parallel to the plane of the Sun's apparent orbit under those systems ( ecliptic ). Despite the fact that the system is considered geocentric , neither of the circles were centered on the earth, rather each planet's motion was centered at a planet-specific point slightly away from the Earth called the eccentric . The orbits of planets in this system are similar to epitrochoids , but are not exactly epitrochoids because

9202-548: The radial and transverse polar basis with the first being the unit vector pointing from the central body to the current location of the orbiting object and the second being the orthogonal unit vector pointing in the direction that the orbiting object would travel if orbiting in a counter clockwise circle. Then the vector to the orbiting object is We use r ˙ {\displaystyle {\dot {r}}} and θ ˙ {\displaystyle {\dot {\theta }}} to denote

9309-422: The required orbits. Deferents and epicycles in the ancient models did not represent orbits in the modern sense, but rather a complex set of circular paths whose centers are separated by a specific distance in order to approximate the observed movement of the celestial bodies. Claudius Ptolemy refined the deferent-and-epicycle concept and introduced the equant as a mechanism that accounts for velocity variations in

9416-533: The rest of the planets fell into place in order outward, arranged in distance by their periods of revolution. Although Copernicus' models reduced the magnitude of the epicycles considerably, whether they were simpler than Ptolemy's is moot. Copernicus eliminated Ptolemy's somewhat-maligned equant but at a cost of additional epicycles. Various 16th-century books based on Ptolemy and Copernicus use about equal numbers of epicycles. The idea that Copernicus used only 34 circles in his system comes from his own statement in

9523-408: The rocket above the atmosphere (which causes frictional drag), and then slowly pitch over and finish firing the rocket engine parallel to the atmosphere to achieve orbit speed. Once in orbit, their speed keeps them in orbit above the atmosphere. If e.g., an elliptical orbit dips into dense air, the object will lose speed and re-enter (i.e. fall). Occasionally a space craft will intentionally intercept

9630-408: The scripture should be always paramount and respected. When Galileo tried to challenge Tycho Brahe's system, the church was dissatisfied with their views being challenged. Galileo's publication did not aid his case in his trial . "Adding epicycles" has come to be used as a derogatory comment in modern scientific discussion. The term might be used, for example, to describe continuing to try to adjust

9737-465: The shift in reference point. It was not until Kepler's proposal of elliptical orbits that such a system became increasingly more accurate than a mere epicyclical geocentric model. Owen Gingerich describes a planetary conjunction that occurred in 1504 and was apparently observed by Copernicus. In notes bound with his copy of the Alfonsine Tables , Copernicus commented that "Mars surpasses

9844-437: The similar number of 40; hence Copernicus effectively replaced the problem of retrograde with further epicycles. Copernicus' theory was at least as accurate as Ptolemy's but never achieved the stature and recognition of Ptolemy's theory. What was needed was Kepler's elliptical-orbit theory, not published until 1609 and 1619. Copernicus' work provided explanations for phenomena like retrograde motion, but really did not prove that

9951-509: The slight oblateness of the Earth , or by relativistic effects , thereby changing the gravitational field's behavior with distance) will cause the orbit's shape to depart from the closed ellipses characteristic of Newtonian two-body motion . The two-body solutions were published by Newton in Principia in 1687. In 1912, Karl Fritiof Sundman developed a converging infinite series that solves

10058-440: The smaller, as in the case of a satellite or small moon orbiting a planet or for the Earth orbiting the Sun, it is accurate enough and convenient to describe the motion in terms of a coordinate system that is centered on the heavier body, and we say that the lighter body is in orbit around the heavier. For the case where the masses of two bodies are comparable, an exact Newtonian solution is still sufficient and can be had by placing

10165-449: The spheres and was developed without any understanding of gravity. After the planets' motions were more accurately measured, theoretical mechanisms such as deferent and epicycles were added. Although the model was capable of reasonably accurately predicting the planets' positions in the sky, more and more epicycles were required as the measurements became more accurate, hence the model became increasingly unwieldy. Originally geocentric , it

10272-730: The standard Euclidean bases and let r ^ = cos ⁡ ( θ ) x ^ + sin ⁡ ( θ ) y ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {r} }}=\cos(\theta ){\hat {\mathbf {x} }}+\sin(\theta ){\hat {\mathbf {y} }}} and θ ^ = − sin ⁡ ( θ ) x ^ + cos ⁡ ( θ ) y ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\boldsymbol {\theta }}}=-\sin(\theta ){\hat {\mathbf {x} }}+\cos(\theta ){\hat {\mathbf {y} }}} be

10379-412: The standard derivatives of how this distance and angle change over time. We take the derivative of a vector to see how it changes over time by subtracting its location at time t {\displaystyle t} from that at time t + δ t {\displaystyle t+\delta t} and dividing by δ t {\displaystyle \delta t} . The result

10486-443: The subscripts can be dropped. We assume that the central body is massive enough that it can be considered to be stationary and we ignore the more subtle effects of general relativity . When a pendulum or an object attached to a spring swings in an ellipse, the inward acceleration/force is proportional to the distance A = F / m = − k r . {\displaystyle A=F/m=-kr.} Due to

10593-463: The system's barycenter in elliptical orbits . A comet in a parabolic or hyperbolic orbit about a barycenter is not gravitationally bound to the star and therefore is not considered part of the star's planetary system. Bodies that are gravitationally bound to one of the planets in a planetary system, either natural or artificial satellites , follow orbits about a barycenter near or within that planet. Owing to mutual gravitational perturbations ,

10700-404: The two-stage configuration. The first was conducted on 1 October 1961. It was successful and reached an apogee of 20 kilometres (12 mi). The second test, launched on 5 May 1962 was also successful, and reached the same apogee. The three Hi-Hoe launches were conducted on 5 October 1961, and 26 March and 25 July 1962. On the first two launches the second stage failed to ignite, however the third

10807-498: The way vectors add, the component of the force in the x ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {x} }}} or in the y ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {y} }}} directions are also proportionate to the respective components of the distances, r x ″ = A x = − k r x {\displaystyle r''_{x}=A_{x}=-kr_{x}} . Hence,

10914-408: The whole are interrelated. A change in a parameter to improve the fit in one place would throw off the fit somewhere else. Ptolemy's model is probably optimal in this regard. On the whole it gave good results but missed a little here and there. Experienced astronomers would have recognized these shortcomings and allowed for them. According to the historian of science Norwood Russell Hanson : There

11021-413: The yet-to-be-discovered elliptical shape of the orbits. Another complication was caused by a problem that Copernicus never solved: correctly accounting for the motion of the Earth in the coordinate transformation. In keeping with past practice, Copernicus used the deferent/epicycle model in his theory but his epicycles were small and were called "epicyclets". In the Ptolemaic system the models for each of

11128-516: Was modified by Copernicus to place the Sun at the centre to help simplify the model. The model was further challenged during the 16th century, as comets were observed traversing the spheres. The basis for the modern understanding of orbits was first formulated by Johannes Kepler whose results are summarised in his three laws of planetary motion. First, he found that the orbits of the planets in our Solar System are elliptical, not circular (or epicyclic ), as had previously been believed, and that

11235-422: Was not constant unless he measured it from another point which is now called the equant (Ptolemy did not give it a name). It was the angular rate at which the deferent moved around the point midway between the equant and the Earth (the eccentric) that was constant; the epicycle center swept out equal angles over equal times only when viewed from the equant. It was the use of equants to decouple uniform motion from

11342-434: Was only in an effort to eliminate Ptolemy's equant, which he considered a philosophical break away from Aristotle's perfection of the heavens. Mathematically, the second epicycle and the equant produce nearly the same results, and many Copernican astronomers before Kepler continued using the equant, as the mathematical calculations were easier. Copernicus' epicycles were also much smaller than Ptolemy's, and were required because

11449-491: Was successful, and reached an apogee of 1,166 kilometres (725 mi). Despite the program's turn towards success, the project was cancelled soon after the final Hi-Hoe test, the Department of Defense choosing to concentrate on the U.S. Air Force 's Blue Scout sounding rocket program. Orbit This is an accepted version of this page In celestial mechanics , an orbit (also known as orbital revolution )

#624375