Misplaced Pages

#967032

33-542: Badarayana ’s Brahma sutras state that pradhana is asabadam , 'not mentioned in the Upanishads', and therefor to be rejected as the first cause. Instead, the later Advaita tradition postulates Brahman as the intelligent, conscious first principle and material and efficient cause of the universe. Pradhāna ( Sanskrit : प्रधान) is an adjective meaning "most important, prime, chief or major". The Shatapatha Brahmana (शतपथ ब्राह्मण) gives its meaning as "the chief cause of

66-644: A great importance on a Guru's guidance and blessings to understand the jnana from scriptures. According to Madhva, śravaṇa and manana are the only means for nidhiyasana. This sadhana leads the sadhaka to aparoksa-jnana (spiritual realisation) and liberation through grace of God. Dvaita philosophers challenge the Advaita Vedanta view that the perception of multiplicity in a singular, unchanging reality arises from cosmic ignorance ( avidya ) inherently linked to Brahman. According to Advaita, this ignorance explains why plurality appears to exist. Madhva questions

99-413: A realist viewpoint". The Tattvavada (Dvaita) Vedanta sub-school was founded by the 13th-century Indian philosopher -saint Madhvacharya . Madhvacharya believed in three entities: God , jiva (soul), and jada ( maya , matter). The Dvaita Vedanta school believes that God and the individual souls ( jīvātman ) exist as independent realities, and these are distinct, being said that Vishnu (Narayana)

132-423: Is absolute freedom; if ananda is embodied it becomes non-limited, i.e. subjected to limitation. According to Sivananda, the inert pradhana cannot create, because activity is necessary for creation. It is not a directive intelligent entity which could initiate activity, and there is no external agency to urge it to act, or restrain it from action. A spontaneous action of pradhana is not possible; it cannot modify in

165-470: Is an essential part of Dvaita Vedanta. By devotion to God and God's grace, jiva attains moksha . However, bad karma results in condemnation from God. According to Madhvacharya, the jiva is unaware of its real nature due to ignorance ( avidyā ) caused by maya , and thus, is unable to realize its expression of intrinsic attributes. Liberation for each jiva means realizing its innate bliss by removal of covering of maya . Liberation can only be achieved by

198-432: Is capable of conveying directly rather than by implication or definition, the highest reach of its thought and its metaphysical ideology do often stressed by Madhva and so well expounded by Jayatirtha ". It may be seen that such a term would do justice to both the aspects of reality—the finite and the infinite". Quoting the term Advitīyatva , Sharma also states that "the term Advitīyatva has been interpreted by Madhva, in

231-585: Is inadequate to express the full content and depth of meaning that Madhva has put into the term Dvaita , as it is to be implied to his system. Even the Sanskrit word Dvaita is not literally capable of expressing more than the fundamental principles accepted. B. N. K. Sharma suggested to use the term Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda as an alternative name to Madhva's system. Sharma says, Satyadhyana Tirtha of Uttaradi Math approved this. B. N. K. Sharma further states that "the term Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda

264-545: Is independent ( svatantra ), and Souls are dependent ( paratantra ) on him. The Dvaita school contrasts with the other two major sub-schools of Vedanta, the Advaita Vedanta of Adi Shankara which posits nondualism —that ultimate reality ( Brahman ) and human soul ( Ātman ) are identical and all reality is interconnected oneness, and Vishishtadvaita of Ramanuja which posits qualified nondualism—that ultimate reality ( Brahman ) and human soul are different but with

297-459: Is negated by the way of significant negation. The adjunct Svatantra would thus serve to emphasize the transcendence of the supreme over the other reals and its immanence in them and show how the conception of Brahman, here, differs from the Nirviśeṣādvaita of Adi Shankara . Quoting the term Svatantra-Advitiya-Brahmavāda , Sharma also says: "It would also stand terminologically balanced with

330-586: Is not mentioned in the Upanishads . For Badarayana, the word ' ikshate ' (meaning seeing or thinking) refers to Brahman, who visualized and created prana (the vital force, Prasna Upanishad VI.3-4), and created the worlds ( Aitareya Upanishad I.i.1-2). Sankara, in his commentary on the Brahma Sutras, argues: According to Chattopadhyaya, sutra I.i.12 – आनन्दमयोऽभ्यासात्, is textually wrong, it should have been worded anandobhyasat because ananda

363-537: Is that "the jiva is different from every other entity including all jivas ". These five differences are said to explain the nature of the universe. The world is called prapañca ( pañca "five") by the Dvaita school for this reason. Madhva differed significantly from traditional Hindu beliefs owing to his concept of eternal damnation . According to him, there are three different classes of souls: One class, Mukti-yogyas , which would qualify for liberation , another,

SECTION 10

#1732773393968

396-434: Is the supreme Self , in a manner similar to the monotheistic God in other major religions. He is believed to be almighty, eternal, always existing, everlasting, all-knowing, and compassionate. The second reality is that of dependent ( asvatantra-tattva or paratantra ) but equally real universe that exists with its own separate essence. Everything that is composed of the second reality, such as individual soul, matter, and

429-547: The Brahma Sutras . The Brahma Sutras is a source text for the Hindu philosophical school of Vedānta and one of three texts along with the Upanishads and Bhagavad Gita which establish the prasthantrayi. Estimates of his lifetime vary very widely from around fifth century BCE to third or fourth century CE. His work Brahma Sutras is variously dated from 500 BCE to 450 CE. The Brahma Sutras of Bādarāyana, also called

462-542: The Nitya-samsarins , which would be subject to eternal rebirth or eternal transmigration and a third class, Tamo-yogyas , which would be condemned to eternal hell ( Andhatamisra ). Moksha (liberation) therefore is described as the realization that all finite reality is essentially dependent on the Supreme. God is believed to have shown the way to attain moksha through several avatars . Bhakti Yoga

495-719: The Chandogya Bhashya , in terms of "absence of peer and superior" to Brahman , conceding by implication, the existence, the reality of "lesser reals" like matter and souls under the aegis of God . The first part of the text has been taken to emphasize the unity of God-head by excluding internal distinctions of substance and attributes in Brahman in conformity with text like नेह नानास्ति किंचना , which are understood as nagating some internal distinctions ( nānātva ) alone in Brahman. The only internal distinctions that are logically conceivable in Brahman, are those of attributes. This

528-465: The Dvaita school of Hindu philosophy , Ishvara , the cause of the universe is the svatantra tattva ('independent reality'), and the created universe is the asvatantra tattva ('dependent reality'), which is a transformation of pradhana ('matter'). Badarayana Traditional Badarayana (IAST Bādarāyaṇa; Devanāgari बादरायण) was an Indian philosopher and sage who was the reputed author of

561-629: The Vedanta Sutra , was compiled in its present form around 400–450 CE, but "the great part of the Sutra must have been in existence much earlier than that". Estimates of the date of Bādarāyana's lifetime differ between 200 BCE and 200 CE. Bādarāyana is regarded as having written the basic text of the Vedanta system, the Vedāntasūtra a.k.a. Brahmasūtra . He is thus considered the founder of

594-462: The Samkhyas is not the cause of the universe, because it is not mentioned in the Upanishads, which fact is clear from the fact of seeing (or thinking). Sankara (and Ramanuja ) interpret the word asabadam (meaning 'not mentioned in the Upanishads') in ईक्षतेर्नाशब्दम् to mean the pradhana of the Samkhyas, and na (meaning not) as the denial of pradhana being the cause of the universe, because it

627-459: The Vedānta system of philosophy. This Hindu philosophy –related article is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Dvaita Dvaita Vedanta ( / ˈ d v aɪ t ə v eɪ ˈ d ɑː n t ə / ); (originally known as Tattvavada ; IAST : Tattvavāda ), is a sub-school in the Vedanta tradition of Hindu philosophy . The term Tattvavada literally means "arguments from

660-453: The absence of purpose, and it cannot have a desire to evolve. Purusa is intelligent and indifferent, but there is no third agency to bring Purusa near Pradhana to effect a connection between the two for starting the activity of creation. Pradhana cannot be active, because there can be no relation of principal or subordinate guna, when the gunas are in equilibrium to constitute Pradhana. Creation cannot proceed from inert or dead matter. Madhva ,

693-508: The balance is distorted, and the 24 principles ('the world') evolves from prakriti. The term 'samkhya' is derived from the word sankhya (numbers), referring to the listing or numbering of the basic principles, purusha , the twenty-four principles of prakrti, and the 'right discrimination' between these principles. Purusha is unproduced, free from all action and modification, without attributes, all-pervading consciousness, individual and separate for each body. When Pradhana manifests it becomes

SECTION 20

#1732773393968

726-662: The distinctions of other Vēdantic systems like Nirviśeṣādvaita , śuddhādvaita , and Viśiṣṭādvaita . It would also lay direct emphasis on the primacy of the supreme as the Para-Siddhanta of the Madhva's thought, and put the teachings about the finite in their proper place as constituting the Apara-Siddhānta (subsidiary truths)". Aluru Venkata Rao opines that the term Dvaita is not suitable for Madhva's philosophy, hence it should not be used. Instead, he suggests to use

759-488: The efficient and the material cause of creation. Prakrti is eternal and all-pervading, unlimited and the material cause, eternally producing everything but insentient. The Brahma Sutras of Badarayana are the oldest extent comprehensive treatment in a systematic manner of the vast corpus of Vedic Thought . In B.S.I.i.5, Badarayana states that pradhana is asabadam , 'not mentioned in the Upanishads', and therefor to be rejected. Brahma Sutra I.i.5 states: The Pradhana of

792-419: The founder of Tattvavada (Realism), interprets the word asabadam to refer to Brahman, who is inexpressible because he is an object of knowledge. Madhva contends that an object presented in illusory perception is an absolute unreality, and no illusion can be explained without the acceptance of two necessary reals – adhisthana ('substratum') and pradhana ('prototype') of the superimposed object ( aropya ). In

825-498: The grace of God with self-effort on the part of the jiva . Practicing vairāgya allows Mukti-yogyas ( jivas qualified for liberation) to gain freedom from worldly attachments and develop faith in God. Self-effort which makes a jiva worthy for liberation involves karma (good work), Jnana Yoga (knowledge) and Bhakti Yoga (devotion). S ādhaka performs such sadhana through śravaṇa , manana and nididhyasana . Madhva also placed

858-642: The heavenly worlds and becoming following organs of God's will, which would also be the case with Vayu and Lakshmi . He also believes that they are mortal, and that some of them could sink into lower stages of existence after death. Therefore, he believes that only God shall be worshipped through them, and that worshipping them on their own behalf is an apostasy which emerged during Treta Yuga , and did not yet exist during Satya Yuga . According to him, this must also be noticed regarding murtis . Dvaita Vedanta acknowledges two principles; however, it holds one of them (the sentient) as being eternally dependent on

891-508: The like exist with their own separate reality. The distinguishing factor of this philosophy, as opposed to monistic Advaita Vedanta , is that God takes on a personal role and is seen as a real eternal entity that governs and controls the universe. Like Ramanuja , Madhvacharya also embraced Vaishnavism . Madhvacharya posits God as being personal and saguna , that is endowed with attributes and qualities (in human terms, which are not believed to be able to fully describe God). To Madhvacharya,

924-486: The material nature" (S.B.7.15.27) or "the creative principle of nature" (S.B.10.85.3). In Samkhya, pradhāna ( Sanskrit : प्रधान) is an alternate term for prakriti ('material nature' and material desires), the "primal matter" and "the first principle from which all material things have evolved." It is a state of equilibrium of the three gunas – sattva , rajas and tamas , the three modes of prakrti. When purusha (primal consciousness) comes in contact with prakriti,

957-484: The metaphysical concept of Brahman in the Vedas was Vishnu. He stated: " Brahmaśabdaśca Viṣṇaveva ", that Brahman can only refer to Vishnu . Scriptures which say different are declared as non-authoritative by him. To him, Vishnu was not just any other deva , but rather the one and only Supreme Being . According to him, the devas are souls of deceased persons who were rewarded for good deeds by being reincarnated into

990-650: The other. The individual souls ( jiva ) are depicted as reflections, images or shadows of the divine, but never in any way (even after moksha , or liberation) identical with the divine. Being a reflection of God, each jiva has a nature with some characteristics (truth, conscious, bliss) of God in varying degree which is under the influence of karma in bondage and expands to its distinct full intrinsic capacity in moksha . Liberated jivas do not attain equality with Brahman and also are not equal to each other. Five fundamental, eternal and real differences are described in Dvaita school: The theory of five differences

1023-418: The possibility of liberation if both the universe and ignorance are mere illusions connected to Brahman. Madhva further argues that there is no similarity between Brahman and the cosmos to justify such an illusion. Madhva questions the idea that avidya is unique to individual selves, arguing that if individuality itself is a misconception, then avidya must also inherently belong to Brahman. He also criticizes

Pradhana - Misplaced Pages Continue

1056-503: The potential to be identical. Sanyasis of the Dvaita Vedanta tradition belong to the ēkadaṇḍi order. Dvaita (द्वैत) is a Sanskrit word that means "duality, dualism". The term refers to any premise, particularly in theology on the material and the divine, where two principles (truths) or realities are posited to exist simultaneously and independently. Indologist B. N. Krishnamurti Sharma says: "The English term Dualism

1089-418: The term Pūrnabrahmavāda . Dvaita Vedanta is a dualistic interpretation of the Vedas systematized by the 13th-century Indian philosopher -saint Madhvacharya , which espouses dualism by theorizing the existence of two separate realities. The first and the only independent reality ( svatantra-tattva ), states the Dvaita school, is that of Vishnu as the ultimate reality ( Brahman ) and Supreme God . Vishnu

#967032