Misplaced Pages

#769230

103-592: The Quantum AI Lab was announced by Google Research in a blog post on May 16, 2013. At the time of launch, the Lab was using the most advanced commercially available quantum computer, D-Wave Two from D-Wave Systems . On October 10, 2013, Google released a short film describing the current state of the Quantum AI Lab. On October 18, 2013, Google announced that it had incorporated quantum physics into Minecraft . In January 2014, Google reported results comparing

206-480: A {\displaystyle a} larger we make the spread in momentum smaller, but the spread in position gets larger. This illustrates the uncertainty principle. As we let the Gaussian wave packet evolve in time, we see that its center moves through space at a constant velocity (like a classical particle with no forces acting on it). However, the wave packet will also spread out as time progresses, which means that

309-456: A reductio ad absurdum , indicating that the postulates of quantum mechanics need to be revised in some way. The various versions of the many worlds interpretation avoid the need to postulate that consciousness causes collapse – indeed, that collapse occurs at all. Hugh Everett III 's doctoral thesis " 'Relative state' formulation of quantum mechanics" serves as the foundation for today's many versions of many-worlds interpretations. In

412-550: A quantum measurement on a physical system. The two observers then formulate a statement about the physical system's state after the measurement according to the laws of quantum theory. In the Copenhagen interpretation , the resulting statements of the two observers contradict each other. This reflects a seeming incompatibility of two laws in the Copenhagen interpretation: the deterministic and continuous time evolution of

515-450: A cat to have collapsed before the box was opened, so the question of observation-of-observers does not arise for them. If the measured system were much simpler (such as a single spin state), then once the observation was made, the system would be expected to collapse, since the larger system of the scientist, equipment, and room would be considered far too complex to become entangled in the superposition. Relational quantum mechanics (RQM)

618-439: A consistency among different agents' statements in the following manner: The statement "I know (by the theory) that they know (by the same theory) that x" is equivalent to "I know that x" . Assumption (S) specifies that once an agent has arrived at a probability-1 assignment of a certain outcome for a given measurement, they could never agree to a different outcome for the same measurement. Assumptions (Q) and (S) are used by

721-466: A definite prediction of what the quantum state ψ ( t ) {\displaystyle \psi (t)} will be at any later time. Some wave functions produce probability distributions that are independent of time, such as eigenstates of the Hamiltonian . Many systems that are treated dynamically in classical mechanics are described by such "static" wave functions. For example,

824-510: A family of unitary operators parameterized by a variable t {\displaystyle t} . Under the evolution generated by A {\displaystyle A} , any observable B {\displaystyle B} that commutes with A {\displaystyle A} will be conserved. Moreover, if B {\displaystyle B} is conserved by evolution under A {\displaystyle A} , then A {\displaystyle A}

927-645: A laboratory, using photons to stand in for the friends. Wigner introduced the thought experiment in a 1961 article "Remarks on the Mind-Body Question". He begins by noting that most physicists in the then-recent past had been thoroughgoing materialists who would insist that "mind" or "soul" are illusory, and that nature is fundamentally deterministic . He argues that quantum physics has changed this situation: Going into more detail, Wigner says: The wave function of an object "exists" (Wigner's quotation marks) because observers can share it: Observing

1030-471: A loss of information, though: knowing the reduced density matrices of the individual systems is not enough to reconstruct the state of the composite system. Just as density matrices specify the state of a subsystem of a larger system, analogously, positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) describe the effect on a subsystem of a measurement performed on a larger system. POVMs are extensively used in quantum information theory. As described above, entanglement

1133-426: A mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics and survey its application to some useful and oft-studied examples. In the mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics, the state of a quantum mechanical system is a vector ψ {\displaystyle \psi } belonging to a ( separable ) complex Hilbert space H {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}} . This vector

SECTION 10

#1732790786770

1236-417: A measurement of its position and also at the same time for a measurement of its momentum . Another consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is the phenomenon of quantum interference , which is often illustrated with the double-slit experiment . In the basic version of this experiment, a coherent light source , such as a laser beam, illuminates a plate pierced by two parallel slits, and

1339-471: A probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives a probability density function for the position that the electron will be found to have when an experiment is performed to measure it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The Schrödinger equation relates the collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to one moment of time to

1442-488: A quantum circuit models the agents as single qubits and their reasoning as simple conditional operations. QBism, relational quantum mechanics and the De Broglie–Bohm theory have been argued to avoid the contradiction suggested by the extended Wigner's-friend scenario of Frauchiger and Renner. Stephen Baxter 's novel Timelike Infinity (1992) discusses a variation of Wigner's friend thought experiment through

1545-420: A range of possible physical situations". And as von Baeyer puts it, "Wavefunctions are not tethered to electrons and carried along like haloes hovering over the heads of saints—they are assigned by an agent and depend on the total information available to the agent." Consequently, there is nothing wrong in principle with Wigner and his friend assigning different wavefunctions to the same system. A similar position

1648-405: A single electron in an unexcited atom is pictured classically as a particle moving in a circular trajectory around the atomic nucleus , whereas in quantum mechanics, it is described by a static wave function surrounding the nucleus. For example, the electron wave function for an unexcited hydrogen atom is a spherically symmetric function known as an s orbital ( Fig. 1 ). Analytic solutions of

1751-551: A single spatial dimension. A free particle is one which is not subject to external influences, so that its Hamiltonian consists only of its kinetic energy: The general solution of the Schrödinger equation is given by which is a superposition of all possible plane waves e i ( k x − ℏ k 2 2 m t ) {\displaystyle e^{i(kx-{\frac {\hbar k^{2}}{2m}}t)}} , which are eigenstates of

1854-472: A specific spin system, and each Wigner measures "his" friend's laboratory (which includes the friend). The individual agents make logical conclusions that are based on their measurement result, aiming at predictions about other agent's measurements within the protocol. Frauchiger and Renner argue that an inconsistency occurs if three assumptions are taken to be simultaneously valid. Roughly speaking, those assumptions are More precisely, assumption (Q) involves

1957-477: A straightforward logical contradiction when letting F {\displaystyle F} and W {\displaystyle W} reason about the laboratory's state of S {\displaystyle S} together with F {\displaystyle F} . Then, the Wigner's Friend scenario shows to Everett an incompatibility of the collapse postulate for describing measurements with

2060-420: A superposition state to the whole laboratory (i.e. the joint system of the physical system together with the friend): The superposition state of the lab is then a linear combination of "system is in state 0 — friend has measured 0" and "system is in state 1 — friend has measured 1". Let Wigner now ask his friend for the result of the measurement. Whichever answer the friend gives (0 or 1), Wigner would then assign

2163-701: A superposition, there is no contradiction with this friend having observed a definite measurement outcome as described by the particle configuration. Thus, according to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, there is no paradox because the wave function alone is not a complete description of the physical state. In 2016, Frauchiger and Renner used an elaboration of the Wigner's-friend scenario to argue that quantum theory cannot be used to model physical systems that are themselves agents who use quantum theory. They provide an information-theoretic analysis of two specifically connected pairs of "Wigner's friend" experiments, where

SECTION 20

#1732790786770

2266-491: A system causes its wave functions to change indeterministically, because "the entering of an impression into our consciousness" implies a revision of "the probabilities for different impressions which we expect to receive in the future". Wigner presents two arguments for the thesis that the mind influences the body, i.e., that a human body can "deviate from the laws of physics" as deduced from experimenting upon inanimate objects. The argument that he personally finds less persuasive

2369-473: Is and this provides the lower bound on the product of standard deviations: Another consequence of the canonical commutation relation is that the position and momentum operators are Fourier transforms of each other, so that a description of an object according to its momentum is the Fourier transform of its description according to its position. The fact that dependence in momentum is the Fourier transform of

2472-418: Is a conscious being. Wigner presents his second argument, which he finds more persuasive, much more briefly: According to physicist Leslie Ballentine, by 1987 Wigner had decided that consciousness does not cause a physical collapse of the wavefunction, although he still believed that his chain of inferences leading up to that conclusion were correct. As Ballentine recounts, Wigner regarded his 1961 argument as

2575-478: Is a key feature of models of measurement processes in which an apparatus becomes entangled with the system being measured. Systems interacting with the environment in which they reside generally become entangled with that environment, a phenomenon known as quantum decoherence . This can explain why, in practice, quantum effects are difficult to observe in systems larger than microscopic. There are many mathematically equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics. One of

2678-414: Is a paradox only if we suppose that a density matrix (i.e. a probability distribution) is something 'physically real' and 'absolute'. But now the dilemma disappears when we recognize the 'relativity principle' for probabilities. A density matrix (or, in classical physics, a probability distribution over coordinates and momenta) represents, not a physical situation, but only a certain state of knowledge about

2781-424: Is a valid joint state that is not separable. States that are not separable are called entangled . If the state for a composite system is entangled, it is impossible to describe either component system A or system B by a state vector. One can instead define reduced density matrices that describe the statistics that can be obtained by making measurements on either component system alone. This necessarily causes

2884-405: Is conserved under the evolution generated by B {\displaystyle B} . This implies a quantum version of the result proven by Emmy Noether in classical ( Lagrangian ) mechanics: for every differentiable symmetry of a Hamiltonian, there exists a corresponding conservation law . The simplest example of a quantum system with a position degree of freedom is a free particle in

2987-1066: Is considered as a sum over all possible classical and non-classical paths between the initial and final states. This is the quantum-mechanical counterpart of the action principle in classical mechanics. The Hamiltonian H {\displaystyle H} is known as the generator of time evolution, since it defines a unitary time-evolution operator U ( t ) = e − i H t / ℏ {\displaystyle U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hbar }} for each value of t {\displaystyle t} . From this relation between U ( t ) {\displaystyle U(t)} and H {\displaystyle H} , it follows that any observable A {\displaystyle A} that commutes with H {\displaystyle H} will be conserved : its expectation value will not change over time. This statement generalizes, as mathematically, any Hermitian operator A {\displaystyle A} can generate

3090-431: Is considered the state of F {\displaystyle F} before the measurement, and | 1 ⟩ F {\displaystyle |1\rangle _{F}} and | 0 ⟩ F {\displaystyle |0\rangle _{F}} are the states corresponding to F {\displaystyle F} 's state when he has measured 1 or 0 respectively. This model

3193-402: Is depicting the situation as relative to W {\displaystyle W} , so the assigned states are relative states with respect to the Wigner system. In contrast, there is no value for the z outcome that actualizes with respect to W {\displaystyle W} , as he is not involved in the measurement. In this sense, two accounts of the same situation (process of

Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab - Misplaced Pages Continue

3296-448: Is given by The operator U ( t ) = e − i H t / ℏ {\displaystyle U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hbar }} is known as the time-evolution operator, and has the crucial property that it is unitary . This time evolution is deterministic in the sense that – given an initial quantum state ψ ( 0 ) {\displaystyle \psi (0)} – it makes

3399-406: Is its associated eigenvector. More generally, the eigenvalue is degenerate and the probability is given by ⟨ ψ , P λ ψ ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle \psi ,P_{\lambda }\psi \rangle } , where P λ {\displaystyle P_{\lambda }} is the projector onto its associated eigenspace. In

3502-726: Is known as wave–particle duality . In addition to light, electrons , atoms , and molecules are all found to exhibit the same dual behavior when fired towards a double slit. Another non-classical phenomenon predicted by quantum mechanics is quantum tunnelling : a particle that goes up against a potential barrier can cross it, even if its kinetic energy is smaller than the maximum of the potential. In classical mechanics this particle would be trapped. Quantum tunnelling has several important consequences, enabling radioactive decay , nuclear fusion in stars, and applications such as scanning tunnelling microscopy , tunnel diode and tunnel field-effect transistor . When quantum systems interact,

3605-444: Is not possible for the solution to be a single momentum eigenstate, or a single position eigenstate, as these are not normalizable quantum states. Instead, we can consider a Gaussian wave packet : which has Fourier transform, and therefore momentum distribution We see that as we make a {\displaystyle a} smaller the spread in position gets smaller, but the spread in momentum gets larger. Conversely, by making

3708-628: Is not sufficient for describing them at very small submicroscopic (atomic and subatomic ) scales. Most theories in classical physics can be derived from quantum mechanics as an approximation, valid at large (macroscopic/microscopic) scale. Quantum systems have bound states that are quantized to discrete values of energy , momentum , angular momentum , and other quantities, in contrast to classical systems where these quantities can be measured continuously. Measurements of quantum systems show characteristics of both particles and waves ( wave–particle duality ), and there are limits to how accurately

3811-815: Is part of quantum communication protocols, such as quantum key distribution and superdense coding . Contrary to popular misconception, entanglement does not allow sending signals faster than light , as demonstrated by the no-communication theorem . Another possibility opened by entanglement is testing for " hidden variables ", hypothetical properties more fundamental than the quantities addressed in quantum theory itself, knowledge of which would allow more exact predictions than quantum theory provides. A collection of results, most significantly Bell's theorem , have demonstrated that broad classes of such hidden-variable theories are in fact incompatible with quantum physics. According to Bell's theorem, if nature actually operates in accord with any theory of local hidden variables, then

3914-540: Is postulated to be normalized under the Hilbert space inner product, that is, it obeys ⟨ ψ , ψ ⟩ = 1 {\displaystyle \langle \psi ,\psi \rangle =1} , and it is well-defined up to a complex number of modulus 1 (the global phase), that is, ψ {\displaystyle \psi } and e i α ψ {\displaystyle e^{i\alpha }\psi } represent

4017-466: Is replaced by − i ℏ ∂ ∂ x {\displaystyle -i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}} , and in particular in the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in position space the momentum-squared term is replaced with a Laplacian times − ℏ 2 {\displaystyle -\hbar ^{2}} . When two different quantum systems are considered together,

4120-408: Is taken by Brukner, who uses an elaboration of the Wigner's-friend scenario to argue for it. The De Broglie-Bohm theory , also known as Bohmian mechanics or pilot wave theory , postulates, in addition to the wave function, an actual configuration of particles that exists even when unobserved. This particle configuration evolves in time according to a deterministic law, with the wave function guiding

4223-617: Is the one that has become known as "Wigner's friend". In this thought experiment, Wigner posits that his friend is in a laboratory, and Wigner lets the friend perform a quantum measurement on a physical system (this could be a spin system ). This system is assumed to be in a superposition of two distinct states, say, state 0 and state 1 (or | 0 ⟩ {\displaystyle |0\rangle } and | 1 ⟩ {\displaystyle |1\rangle } in Dirac notation ). When Wigner's friend measures

Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab - Misplaced Pages Continue

4326-415: Is the reduced Planck constant . The constant i ℏ {\displaystyle i\hbar } is introduced so that the Hamiltonian is reduced to the classical Hamiltonian in cases where the quantum system can be approximated by a classical system; the ability to make such an approximation in certain limits is called the correspondence principle . The solution of this differential equation

4429-469: Is then If the state for the first system is the vector ψ A {\displaystyle \psi _{A}} and the state for the second system is ψ B {\displaystyle \psi _{B}} , then the state of the composite system is Not all states in the joint Hilbert space H A B {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{AB}} can be written in this form, however, because

4532-452: Is where an apparent paradox comes into play: From the point of view of the friend, the measurement result was determined long before Wigner had asked about it, and the state of the physical system has already collapsed. When exactly did the collapse occur? Was it when the friend had finished their measurement, or when the information of its result entered Wigner's consciousness ? As Wigner says, he could ask his friend, "What did you feel about

4635-505: The Born rule : in the simplest case the eigenvalue λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is non-degenerate and the probability is given by | ⟨ λ → , ψ ⟩ | 2 {\displaystyle |\langle {\vec {\lambda }},\psi \rangle |^{2}} , where λ → {\displaystyle {\vec {\lambda }}}

4738-713: The canonical commutation relation : Given a quantum state, the Born rule lets us compute expectation values for both X {\displaystyle X} and P {\displaystyle P} , and moreover for powers of them. Defining the uncertainty for an observable by a standard deviation , we have and likewise for the momentum: The uncertainty principle states that Either standard deviation can in principle be made arbitrarily small, but not both simultaneously. This inequality generalizes to arbitrary pairs of self-adjoint operators A {\displaystyle A} and B {\displaystyle B} . The commutator of these two operators

4841-423: The photoelectric effect . These early attempts to understand microscopic phenomena, now known as the " old quantum theory ", led to the full development of quantum mechanics in the mid-1920s by Niels Bohr , Erwin Schrödinger , Werner Heisenberg , Max Born , Paul Dirac and others. The modern theory is formulated in various specially developed mathematical formalisms . In one of them, a mathematical entity called

4944-562: The wave function provides information, in the form of probability amplitudes , about what measurements of a particle's energy, momentum, and other physical properties may yield. Quantum mechanics allows the calculation of properties and behaviour of physical systems. It is typically applied to microscopic systems: molecules, atoms and sub-atomic particles. It has been demonstrated to hold for complex molecules with thousands of atoms, but its application to human beings raises philosophical problems, such as Wigner's friend , and its application to

5047-431: The Hilbert space for the spin of a single proton is simply the space of two-dimensional complex vectors C 2 {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{2}} with the usual inner product. Physical quantities of interest – position, momentum, energy, spin – are represented by observables, which are Hermitian (more precisely, self-adjoint ) linear operators acting on

5150-411: The Hilbert space of the combined system is the tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of the two components. For example, let A and B be two quantum systems, with Hilbert spaces H A {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{A}} and H B {\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}_{B}} , respectively. The Hilbert space of the composite system

5253-432: The Hilbert space. A quantum state can be an eigenvector of an observable, in which case it is called an eigenstate , and the associated eigenvalue corresponds to the value of the observable in that eigenstate. More generally, a quantum state will be a linear combination of the eigenstates, known as a quantum superposition . When an observable is measured, the result will be one of its eigenvalues with probability given by

SECTION 50

#1732790786770

5356-602: The Quantum AI Lab announced in a paper that it had achieved quantum supremacy . Quantum physics Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory that describes the behavior of nature at and below the scale of atoms . It is the foundation of all quantum physics , which includes quantum chemistry , quantum field theory , quantum technology , and quantum information science . Quantum mechanics can describe many systems that classical physics cannot. Classical physics can describe many aspects of nature at an ordinary ( macroscopic and (optical) microscopic ) scale, but

5459-489: The Schrödinger equation are known for very few relatively simple model Hamiltonians including the quantum harmonic oscillator , the particle in a box , the dihydrogen cation , and the hydrogen atom . Even the helium atom – which contains just two electrons – has defied all attempts at a fully analytic treatment, admitting no solution in closed form . However, there are techniques for finding approximate solutions. One method, called perturbation theory , uses

5562-608: The Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box are or, from Euler's formula , Wigner%27s friend Wigner's friend is a thought experiment in theoretical quantum physics , first published by the Hungarian-American physicist Eugene Wigner in 1961, and further developed by David Deutsch in 1985. The scenario involves an indirect observation of a quantum measurement : An observer W {\displaystyle W} observes another observer F {\displaystyle F} who performs

5665-400: The Wigner's-friend situation does not lead to a paradox, because there is never a uniquely correct wavefunction for any system. Instead, a wavefunction is a statement of personalist Bayesian probabilities, and moreover, the probabilities that wavefunctions encode are probabilities for experiences that are also personal to the agent who experiences them. Jaynes expresses this as follows: "There

5768-485: The [measurement result] before I asked you?" The question of what result the friend has seen is surely "already decided in his mind", Wigner writes, which implies that the friend–system joint state must already be one of the collapsed options, not a superposition of them. Wigner concludes that the linear time evolution of quantum states according to the Schrödinger equation cannot apply when the physical entity involved

5871-473: The agents when reasoning about measurement outcomes of other agents, and assumption (C) comes in when an agent combines other agent's statements with their own. The result is contradictory, and therefore, assumptions (Q), (C) and (S) cannot all be valid, hence the no-go theorem . The meaning and implications of the Frauchiger– Renner thought experiment are highly debated. A number of assumptions taken in

5974-403: The analytic result for a simple quantum mechanical model to create a result for a related but more complicated model by (for example) the addition of a weak potential energy . Another approximation method applies to systems for which quantum mechanics produces only small deviations from classical behavior. These deviations can then be computed based on the classical motion. One consequence of

6077-400: The argument are very foundational in content and therefore cannot be given up easily. However, the questions remains whether there are "hidden" assumptions that do not explicitly appear in the argument. The authors themselves conclude that "quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner". On the other hand, one presentation of the experiment as

6180-422: The authors' interpretation of their result is apparent: Quantum theory as given by the textbook and used in the numerous laboratory experiments to date "cannot consistently describe the use of itself" in any given (hypothetical) scenario. The implications of the result are currently subject to many debates among physicists of both theoretical and experimental quantum mechanics. In particular, the various proponents of

6283-606: The basic quantum formalism is the uncertainty principle. In its most familiar form, this states that no preparation of a quantum particle can imply simultaneously precise predictions both for a measurement of its position and for a measurement of its momentum. Both position and momentum are observables, meaning that they are represented by Hermitian operators . The position operator X ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {X}}} and momentum operator P ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {P}}} do not commute, but rather satisfy

SECTION 60

#1732790786770

6386-404: The collection of probability amplitudes that pertain to another. One consequence of the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics is a tradeoff in predictability between measurable quantities. The most famous form of this uncertainty principle says that no matter how a quantum particle is prepared or how carefully experiments upon it are arranged, it is impossible to have a precise prediction for

6489-626: The continuous case, these formulas give instead the probability density . After the measurement, if result λ {\displaystyle \lambda } was obtained, the quantum state is postulated to collapse to λ → {\displaystyle {\vec {\lambda }}} , in the non-degenerate case, or to P λ ψ / ⟨ ψ , P λ ψ ⟩ {\textstyle P_{\lambda }\psi {\big /}\!{\sqrt {\langle \psi ,P_{\lambda }\psi \rangle }}} , in

6592-431: The dependence in position means that the momentum operator is equivalent (up to an i / ℏ {\displaystyle i/\hbar } factor) to taking the derivative according to the position, since in Fourier analysis differentiation corresponds to multiplication in the dual space . This is why in quantum equations in position space, the momentum p i {\displaystyle p_{i}}

6695-410: The deterministic evolution of closed systems. In the context of his new theory, Everett claims to solve the Wigner's friend paradox by only allowing a continuous unitary time evolution of the wave function of the universe. However, there is no evidence of any written argument of Everett 's on the topic. In many-worlds interpretations , measurements are modelled as interactions between subsystems of

6798-495: The different interpretations of quantum mechanics have challenged the validity of the Frauchiger–Renner argument. The experiment was designed using a combination of arguments by Wigner (Wigner's friend), Deutsch and Hardy (see Hardy's paradox ). The setup involves a number of macroscopic agents (observers) performing predefined quantum measurements in a given time order. Those agents are assumed to all be aware of

6901-408: The fact that, in many situations, "empty branches" of the wave function, which do not guide the actual particle configuration, can be ignored for all practical purposes. The De Broglie-Bohm theory does not assign any special status to conscious observers. In the Wigner's-friend situation, the first measurement would lead to an effective collapse. But even if Wigner describes the state of his friend as

7004-405: The friend assigns to the spin is a state relative to himself as friend, whereas the state that Wigner assigns to the combined system of friend and spin is a state relative to himself as Wigner. By construction of the theory, these two descriptions do not have to match, because both are correct assignments of states relative to their respective system. If the physical variable that is measured of

7107-417: The friend has received the measurement outcome 0. If then Wigner measures at a later time the combined system of friend and spin system, the world again splits into two parallel parts. According to objective-collapse theories , wave-function collapse occurs when a superposed system reaches a certain objective threshold of size or complexity. Objective-collapse proponents would expect a system as macroscopic as

7210-415: The general case. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics thus stems from the act of measurement. This is one of the most difficult aspects of quantum systems to understand. It was the central topic in the famous Bohr–Einstein debates , in which the two scientists attempted to clarify these fundamental principles by way of thought experiments . In the decades after the formulation of quantum mechanics,

7313-447: The human observers are modelled within quantum theory. By then letting the four different agents reason about each other's measurement results (using the laws of quantum mechanics), contradictory statements are derived. The resulting theorem highlights an incompatibility of a number of assumptions that are usually taken for granted when modelling measurements in quantum mechanics. In the title of their published version of September 2018,

7416-431: The interaction of the two systems. A different way to model the same situation is again an outside (Wigner's) perspective. From that viewpoint, a measurement by one system ( F {\displaystyle F} ) of another ( S {\displaystyle S} ) results in a correlation of the two systems. The state displaying such a correlation is equally valid for modelling the measurement process. However,

7519-462: The interference pattern appears via the varying density of these particle hits on the screen. Furthermore, versions of the experiment that include detectors at the slits find that each detected photon passes through one slit (as would a classical particle), and not through both slits (as would a wave). However, such experiments demonstrate that particles do not form the interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through. This behavior

7622-427: The introductory part of his work, Everett discusses the "amusing, but extremely hypothetical drama" of the Wigner's friend paradox. Note that there is evidence of a drawing of the scenario in an early draft of Everett's thesis. It was therefore Everett who provided the first written discussion of the problem four or five years before it was discussed in "Remarks on the mind-body question" by Wigner, of whom it received

7725-430: The light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere , producing bright and dark bands on the screen – a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles. However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles rather than waves;

7828-448: The measurement of the physical variable z on the system S {\displaystyle S} by F {\displaystyle F} ) are accepted within RQM to exist side by side. Only when deciding for a reference system, a statement for the "correct" account of the situation can be made. In the interpretation known as QBism , advocated by N. David Mermin among others,

7931-432: The momentum operator with momentum p = ℏ k {\displaystyle p=\hbar k} . The coefficients of the superposition are ψ ^ ( k , 0 ) {\displaystyle {\hat {\psi }}(k,0)} , which is the Fourier transform of the initial quantum state ψ ( x , 0 ) {\displaystyle \psi (x,0)} . It

8034-413: The motion of the particles. The particle configuration determines the actual measurement outcome —e.g., whether Schrödinger's cat is dead or alive or whether Wigner's friend has measured 0 or 1— even if the wave function is a superposition. Indeed, according to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, the wave function never collapses on the fundamental level. There is, however, a concept of effective collapse , based on

8137-426: The name and fame thereafter. However, Everett being a student of Wigner's, it is clear that they must have discussed it together at some point. In contrast to his teacher Wigner, who held the consciousness of an observer to be responsible for a collapse, Everett understands the Wigner's friend scenario in a different way: Insisting that quantum states assignments should be objective and nonperspectival, Everett derives

8240-413: The oldest and most common is the " transformation theory " proposed by Paul Dirac , which unifies and generalizes the two earliest formulations of quantum mechanics – matrix mechanics (invented by Werner Heisenberg ) and wave mechanics (invented by Erwin Schrödinger ). An alternative formulation of quantum mechanics is Feynman 's path integral formulation , in which a quantum-mechanical amplitude

8343-412: The one-dimensional case in the x {\displaystyle x} direction, the time-independent Schrödinger equation may be written With the differential operator defined by with state ψ {\displaystyle \psi } in this case having energy E {\displaystyle E} coincident with the kinetic energy of the particle. The general solutions of

8446-455: The original quantum system ceases to exist as an independent entity (see Measurement in quantum mechanics ). The time evolution of a quantum state is described by the Schrödinger equation: Here H {\displaystyle H} denotes the Hamiltonian , the observable corresponding to the total energy of the system, and ℏ {\displaystyle \hbar }

8549-514: The performance of the D-Wave Two in the lab with that of classical computers. The results were ambiguous and provoked heated discussion on the Internet. On 2 September 2014, it was announced that the Quantum AI Lab, in partnership with UC Santa Barbara , would be launching an initiative to create quantum information processors based on superconducting electronics. On the 23rd of October 2019,

8652-428: The position becomes more and more uncertain. The uncertainty in momentum, however, stays constant. The particle in a one-dimensional potential energy box is the most mathematically simple example where restraints lead to the quantization of energy levels. The box is defined as having zero potential energy everywhere inside a certain region, and therefore infinite potential energy everywhere outside that region. For

8755-449: The probability predictions within quantum theory given by the Born rule . This means that an agent is allowed to trust this rule being correct in assigning probabilities to other outcomes conditioned on his own measurement result. It is, however, sufficient for the extended Wigner's friend experiment to assume the validity of the Born rule for probability-1 cases, i.e., if the prediction can be made with certainty. Assumption (C) invokes

8858-400: The question of what constitutes a "measurement" has been extensively studied. Newer interpretations of quantum mechanics have been formulated that do away with the concept of " wave function collapse " (see, for example, the many-worlds interpretation ). The basic idea is that when a quantum system interacts with a measuring apparatus, their respective wave functions become entangled so that

8961-413: The result can be the creation of quantum entanglement : their properties become so intertwined that a description of the whole solely in terms of the individual parts is no longer possible. Erwin Schrödinger called entanglement "... the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics, the one that enforces its entire departure from classical lines of thought". Quantum entanglement enables quantum computing and

9064-566: The results of a Bell test will be constrained in a particular, quantifiable way. Many Bell tests have been performed and they have shown results incompatible with the constraints imposed by local hidden variables. It is not possible to present these concepts in more than a superficial way without introducing the mathematics involved; understanding quantum mechanics requires not only manipulating complex numbers, but also linear algebra , differential equations , group theory , and other more advanced subjects. Accordingly, this article will present

9167-463: The same physical system. In other words, the possible states are points in the projective space of a Hilbert space, usually called the complex projective space . The exact nature of this Hilbert space is dependent on the system – for example, for describing position and momentum the Hilbert space is the space of complex square-integrable functions L 2 ( C ) {\displaystyle L^{2}(\mathbb {C} )} , while

9270-830: The situation as ( α | 0 ⟩ S + β | 1 ⟩ S ) | ⊥ ⟩ F → α ( | 0 ⟩ S ⊗ | 0 ⟩ F ) + β ( | 1 ⟩ S ⊗ | 1 ⟩ F ) , {\displaystyle {\big (}\alpha |0\rangle _{S}+\beta |1\rangle _{S}{\big )}|\bot \rangle _{F}\to \alpha {\big (}|0\rangle _{S}\otimes |0\rangle _{F}{\big )}+\beta {\big (}|1\rangle _{S}\otimes |1\rangle _{F}{\big )},} where | ⊥ ⟩ F {\displaystyle |\bot \rangle _{F}}

9373-529: The spin system is denoted by z , where z takes the possible outcome values 0 or 1, the above Wigner's friend situation is modelled in the RQM context as follows: F {\displaystyle F} models the situation as the before-after-transition α | 0 ⟩ S + β | 1 ⟩ S → | 1 ⟩ S {\displaystyle \alpha |0\rangle _{S}+\beta |1\rangle _{S}\to |1\rangle _{S}} of

9476-417: The state "system is in state 0 — friend has measured 0" or "system is in state 1 — friend has measured 1" to the laboratory. Therefore, it is only at the time when he learns about his friend's result that the superposition state of the laboratory collapses. However, unless Wigner is considered in a "privileged position as ultimate observer", the friend's point of view must be regarded as equally valid, and this

9579-436: The state of S {\displaystyle S} relative to him (here it was assumed that F {\displaystyle F} received the outcome z  = 1 in his measurement of S {\displaystyle S} ). In RQM language, the fact z = 1 for the spin of S {\displaystyle S} actualized itself relative to F {\displaystyle F} during

9682-405: The state of a closed system and the nondeterministic, discontinuous collapse of the state of a system upon measurement. Wigner's friend is therefore directly linked to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics with its famous Schrödinger's cat paradox. Generalizations and extensions of Wigner's friend have been proposed. Two such scenarios involving multiple friends have been implemented in

9785-625: The superposition principle implies that linear combinations of these "separable" or "product states" are also valid. For example, if ψ A {\displaystyle \psi _{A}} and ϕ A {\displaystyle \phi _{A}} are both possible states for system A {\displaystyle A} , and likewise ψ B {\displaystyle \psi _{B}} and ϕ B {\displaystyle \phi _{B}} are both possible states for system B {\displaystyle B} , then

9888-437: The system in the {0,1}- basis , according to quantum mechanics, they will get one of the two possible outcomes (0 or 1) and the system will collapse into the corresponding state. Now Wigner himself models the scenario from outside the laboratory, knowing that inside, his friend will at some point perform the 0/1-measurement on the physical system. According to the linearity of the quantum mechanical equations, Wigner will assign

9991-453: The system with respect to which this correlated state is valid changes. Assuming that Wigner ( W {\displaystyle W} ) has the information that the physical variable z of S {\displaystyle S} is being measured by F {\displaystyle F} , but not knowing what F {\displaystyle F} received as result, W {\displaystyle W} must model

10094-441: The theory is that it usually cannot predict with certainty what will happen, but only give probabilities. Mathematically, a probability is found by taking the square of the absolute value of a complex number , known as a probability amplitude. This is known as the Born rule , named after physicist Max Born . For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a wave function, which associates to each point in space

10197-425: The universe and manifest themselves as a branching of the universal state. The different branches account for the different possible measurement outcomes and are seen to exist as subjective experiences of the corresponding observers. In this view, the friend's measurement of the spin results in a branching of the world into two parallel worlds, one, in which the friend has measured the spin to be 1, and another, in which

10300-437: The universe as a whole remains speculative. Predictions of quantum mechanics have been verified experimentally to an extremely high degree of accuracy . For example, the refinement of quantum mechanics for the interaction of light and matter, known as quantum electrodynamics (QED), has been shown to agree with experiment to within 1 part in 10 when predicting the magnetic properties of an electron. A fundamental feature of

10403-526: The value of a physical quantity can be predicted prior to its measurement, given a complete set of initial conditions (the uncertainty principle ). Quantum mechanics arose gradually from theories to explain observations that could not be reconciled with classical physics, such as Max Planck 's solution in 1900 to the black-body radiation problem, and the correspondence between energy and frequency in Albert Einstein 's 1905 paper , which explained

10506-691: The whole experiment and to be able to use quantum theory to make statements about other people's measurement results. The design of the thought experiment is such that the different agents' observations along with their logical conclusions drawn from a quantum-theoretical analysis yields inconsistent statements. The scenario corresponds roughly to two parallel pairs of "Wigners" and friends: F 1 {\displaystyle F_{1}} with W 1 {\displaystyle W_{1}} and F 2 {\displaystyle F_{2}} with W 2 {\displaystyle W_{2}} . The friends each measure

10609-418: Was developed in 1996 by Carlo Rovelli and is one of the more recent interpretations of quantum mechanics . In RQM, any physical system can play the role of an observing system, to which any other system may display "facts" about physical variables. This inherent relativity of facts in RQM provides a straightforward "solution" to the seemingly paradoxical situation in Wigner's friend scenario: The state that

#769230