Misplaced Pages

Rights

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Rights are legal , social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement ; that is, rights are the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people according to some legal system, social convention , or ethical theory. Rights are an important concept in law and ethics , especially theories of justice and deontology .

#123876

62-606: The history of social conflicts has often involved attempts to define and redefine rights. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , "rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws , and the shape of morality as it is currently perceived". Some thinkers see rights in only one sense while others accept that both senses have a measure of validity. There has been considerable philosophical debate about these senses throughout history. For example, Jeremy Bentham believed that legal rights were

124-618: A right to be employed in just and favorable condition , rights to food , housing and health care , as well as social security and unemployment benefits . Like first-generation rights, they were also covered by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and further embodied in Articles 22 to 28 of the Universal Declaration, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights . In

186-505: A German revolutionary, emphasized his materialist views on ownership and means of production. He argued that what is most valued is a result of human labour, and he founded his ideas based on a capitalistic community, with most money being owned by only a few people. That causes a distinction between the class of the industrialists and that of the working class. The few industrialists own the means of production. The working class earns wages by selling its labour. Problems become noticeable because

248-482: A claim right forbidding him from doing so. Likewise, if a person has a claim right against someone else, then that other person's liberty is limited. For example, a person has a liberty right to walk down a sidewalk and can decide freely whether or not to do so, since there is no obligation either to do so or to refrain from doing so. But pedestrians may have an obligation not to walk on certain lands, such as other people's private property, to which those other people have

310-498: A claim right. So a person's liberty right of walking extends precisely to the point where another's claim right limits his or her freedom. In one sense, a right is a permission to do something or an entitlement to a specific service or treatment from others, and these rights have been called positive rights . However, in another sense, rights may allow or require inaction, and these are called negative rights ; they permit or require doing nothing. For example, in some countries, e.g.

372-405: A commodity by no longer being able to keep up with the business and will have to put it up for sale on the market. Lewis A. Coser disagrees with most other American sociologists and contends that they have badly neglected and misunderstood the concept and function of social conflict. He defines social conflict as "a struggle over the values and claims to scarce status, power and resources in which

434-400: A distribution which nobody has designed, and something which has not been designed, a mere state of affairs as such, cannot be just or unjust. And the idea that things ought to be designed in a "just" manner means, in effect, that we must abandon the market and turn to a planned economy in which somebody decides how much each ought to have, and that means, of course, that we can only have it at

496-456: A new range of rights would be found, such as: Others point out that the differentiating element would be that, while the first three generations refer to the human being as a member of society, the rights of the fourth would refer to the human being as a species. History of human rights . Right to life and liberty. Human beings have a natural right to life. There shouldn't ever be a situation where someone could have to think twice about being

558-440: A period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production. No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient to have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before

620-417: A person, that commitment should be accompanied by a further concern about the conditions of the person's life that make it possible for him to enjoy and exercise that liberty. Why on earth would it be worth fighting for this person's liberty (say, his liberty to choose between A and B) if he were left in a situation in which the choice between A and B meant nothing to him, or in which his choosing one rather than

682-445: A response to the inequalities of the capitalist system. Weber discussed the conflict of stratification and its effects on power in society and stressed property , prestige, and power to be the main influences to the conflicting behaviours of groups in society. Marx argued: "The worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and range. The worker becomes an ever cheaper commodity

SECTION 10

#1732750083124

744-489: A right, others have a duty to respect that right, but governments lack the resources necessary to fulfill the duties implied by citizens' supposed second- and third-generation rights. Charles Kesler , a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College and senior fellow of the Claremont Institute , has argued that second- and third-generation human rights serve as an attempt to cloak political goals, which

806-916: A speech two years later, his divisions follow the three watchwords of the French Revolution : Liberty, Equality, Fraternity . The three generations are reflected in some of the rubrics of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union . While the Universal Declaration of Human Rights lists first- and second-generation rights, the document itself does not specifically order them in accordance with Vasak's framework. First-generation human rights, sometimes called "blue rights", deal essentially with liberty and participation in political life. They are fundamentally civil and political in nature: They serve negatively to protect

868-431: Is goodness?" and "How can we tell what is good from what is bad?", seeking to understand the nature of ethical properties and evaluations. Rights ethics is an answer to the meta-ethical question of what normative ethics is concerned with (meta-ethics also includes a group of questions about how ethics comes to be known, true, etc. which is not directly addressed by rights ethics). Rights ethics holds that normative ethics

930-696: Is an international document about rights and freedoms for all human beings. This document is for all human beings, not just subject to a particular group or ethnicity. This was a major stepping stone for the international human rights law . this was a document that was set in 1966 and became enforced in 1976. Its not bound by anyone its just has been put into practice by the UDHR. It has been apart of international treaties and global constitutional rights and legal doctrines. Maurice Cranston argued that scarcity means that supposed second-generation and third-generation rights are not really rights at all. If one person has

992-487: Is concerned with rights. Alternative meta-ethical theories are that ethics is concerned with one of the following: Rights ethics has had considerable influence on political and social thinking. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives some concrete examples of widely accepted rights. Some philosophers have criticised some rights as ontologically dubious entities. The specific enumeration of rights has differed greatly in different periods of history. In many cases,

1054-404: Is conflicts between unions and their members. For example, individual members of a union may wish a wage higher than the union-negotiated wage, but are prevented from making further requests; in a so-called closed shop which has a union security agreement , only the union has a right to decide matters for the individual union members such as wage rates. So, do the supposed "individual rights" of

1116-425: Is imposed on the state because it controls its own resources. No one has the direct right to housing and right to education . (In South Africa , for instance, the right is not, per se , to housing, but rather "to have access to adequate housing", realised on a progressive basis. ) The duty of government is in the realization of these positive rights. Third-generation human rights are those rights that go beyond

1178-411: Is not clear, and these analysts do not present a unique proposal. They normally take some rights from the third generation and include them in the fourth, such as the right to a healthy environment or aspects related to bioethics . Some of those analysts believe that the fourth generation is given by human rights in relation to new technologies , while others prefer to talk about digital rights, where

1240-414: Is often bound up with the meaning of "rights" often depends on one's political orientation. Conservatives and right-wing libertarians and advocates of free markets often identify equality with equality of opportunity , and want what they perceive as equal and fair rules in the process of making things, while agreeing that sometimes these fair rules lead to unequal outcomes. In contrast, socialists see

1302-574: Is the struggle for agency or power in society . Social conflict occurs when two or more people oppose each other in social interaction, and each exerts social power with reciprocity in an effort to achieve incompatible goals but prevent the other from attaining their own. It is a social relationship in which action is intentionally oriented to carry out the actor's own will despite the resistance of others. Conflict theory emphasizes interests, rather than norms and values , in conflict. The pursuit of interests generates various types of conflict, which

SECTION 20

#1732750083124

1364-455: Is the branch of ethics that seeks to understand the nature of ethical properties , statements, attitudes, and judgments. Meta-ethics is one of the three branches of ethics generally recognized by philosophers , the others being normative ethics and applied ethics . While normative ethics addresses such questions as "What should one do?", thus endorsing some ethical evaluations and rejecting others, meta-ethics addresses questions such as "What

1426-415: Is thus seen as a normal aspect of social life, rather than an abnormal occurrence. Competition over resources is often the cause of conflict. The theory has three tenets: One branch of conflict theory is critical criminology , a term based upon the view that the fundamental cause of crime is oppression, which results from social and economic forces operating within a given society. The perspective stems from

1488-466: Is used by the economists to justify individual rights . Similarly, the author Ayn Rand argued that only individuals have rights, according to her philosophy known as Objectivism . However, others have argued that there are situations in which a group of persons is thought to have rights, or group rights . Other distinctions between rights draw more on historical association or family resemblance than on precise philosophical distinctions. These include

1550-753: The English Bill of Rights in 1689. A more full set of first-generation human rights was pioneered in France by the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in 1789, and by the United States Bill of Rights in 1791. They were enshrined at the global level and given status in international law first by Articles 3 to 21 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and later in

1612-754: The United States , citizens have the positive right to vote and they have the negative right to not vote; people can choose not to vote in a given election without punishment. In other countries, e.g. Australia , however, citizens have a positive right to vote but they do not have a negative right to not vote, since voting is compulsory . Accordingly: Though similarly named, positive and negative rights should not be confused with active rights (which encompass "privileges" and "powers") and passive rights (which encompass "claims" and "immunities"). There can be tension between individual and group rights. A classic instance in which group and individual rights clash

1674-587: The United States of America , President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a Second Bill of Rights , covering much the same grounds, during his State of the Union Address on January 11, 1944. Today, many nations, states, or groups of nations have developed legally binding declarations guaranteeing comprehensive sets of human rights, e.g. the European Social Charter . Some U.S. states have enacted some of these economic rights; for example,

1736-520: The 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights . In Europe, they were enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights in 1953. Second-generation human rights are related to equality and began to be recognized by governments after World War II . They are fundamentally economic, social, and cultural in nature. They guarantee different members of the citizenry equal conditions and treatment. Secondary rights would include

1798-650: The Environment of the European Commission has as its mission "protecting, preserving and improving the environment for present and future generations, and promoting sustainable development". A few jurisdictions have enacted provisions for environmental protection , e.g. New York's "forever wild" constitutional article, which is enforceable by action of the New York State Attorney General or by any citizen ex rel. with

1860-529: The German philosopher Karl Marx , who viewed the justice system and the laws to favour the rich and the powerful in a society and for the poor to be punished far more severely for much smaller crimes. In his Critique of the Political Economy , Karl Marx noted: In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely

1922-905: The Hungarian Parliamentary Commissioner for Future Generations, the Parliament of Finland 's Committee for the Future  [ fi ] , and the erstwhile Commission for Future Generations in the Israeli Knesset . Some international organizations have offices for safeguarding such rights. An example is the High Commissioner on National Minorities of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe . The Directorate-General for

Rights - Misplaced Pages Continue

1984-533: The U.S., the new rights create a "nationalization" of political decision-making at the federal level in violation of federalism. In his book Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift , Paul Rahe, professor at Hillsdale College , wrote that focusing on equality-based rights leads to a subordination of the initial civil rights to an ever-expanding government, which would be too incompetent to provide for its citizens correctly and would merely seek to subordinate more rights. 19th century philosopher Frederic Bastiat summarized

2046-721: The aims of the opponents are to neutralize, injure, or eliminate their rivals". Here are some types of social conflict: Three generations of human rights The division of human rights into three generations was initially proposed in 1979 by the Czech jurist Karel Vasak at the International Institute of Human Rights in Strasbourg . He used the term at least as early as November 1977. Vasak's theories have primarily taken root in European law. In

2108-600: The conflict between these negative and positive rights by saying: M. de Lamartine wrote me one day: "Your doctrine is only the half of my program; you have stopped at liberty; I go on to fraternity." I answered him: "The second half of your program will destroy the first half." And, in fact, it is quite impossible for me to separate the word "fraternity" from the word "voluntary". It is quite impossible for me to conceive of fraternity as legally enforced, without liberty being legally destroyed, and justice being legally trampled underfoot. Economist Friedrich Hayek has argued that

2170-477: The consent of the Appellate Division . Several analysts claim that a fourth generation of human rights is emerging, which would include rights that cannot be included in the third generation, future claims of first and second generation rights and new rights, especially in relation to technological development and information and communication technologies and cyberspace. However, the content of it

2232-407: The discussion about which behaviors are included as "rights" is an ongoing political topic of importance. The concept of rights varies with political orientation. Positive rights such as a "right to medical care" are emphasized more often by left-leaning thinkers, while right-leaning thinkers place more emphasis on negative rights such as the "right to a fair trial". Further, the term equality which

2294-489: The distinction between civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights , between which the articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are often divided. Another conception of rights groups them into three generations . These distinctions have much overlap with that between negative and positive rights , as well as between individual rights and group rights , but these groupings are not entirely coextensive. Rights are often included in

2356-501: The economic development of society. The bourgeois mode of production is the last antagonistic form of the social process of production – antagonistic not in the sense of individual antagonism but of an antagonism that emanates from the individuals' social conditions of existence – but the productive forces developing within bourgeois society create also the material conditions for a solution of this antagonism. The prehistory of human society accordingly closes with this social formation. Marx,

2418-574: The economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure. In studying such transformations it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophic – in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such

2480-449: The economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At some stage of development,

2542-414: The essence of rights, and he denied the existence of natural rights, whereas Thomas Aquinas held that rights purported by positive law but not grounded in natural law were not properly rights at all, but only a facade or pretense of rights. Liberty rights and claim rights are the inverse of one another: a person has a liberty right permitting him to do something only if there is no other person who has

Rights - Misplaced Pages Continue

2604-644: The foundational questions that governments and politics have been designed to deal with. Often the development of these socio-political institutions have formed a dialectical relationship with rights. Rights about particular issues, or the rights of particular groups, are often areas of special concern. Often these concerns arise when rights come into conflict with other legal or moral issues, sometimes even other rights. Issues of concern have historically included Indigenous rights , labor rights , LGBT rights , reproductive rights , disability rights , patient rights and prisoners' rights . With increasing monitoring and

2666-512: The individual from excesses of the state. First-generation rights include, among other things, the right to life , equality before the law , freedom of speech , freedom of religion , property rights , the right to a fair trial , and voting rights . Some of these rights and the right to due process date back to the Magna Carta of 1215 and the Rights of Englishmen , which were expressed in

2728-417: The information society, information rights , such as the right to privacy are becoming more important. Some examples of groups whose rights are of particular concern include animals , and amongst humans , groups such as children and youth , parents (both mothers and fathers ), and men and women . Accordingly, politics plays an important role in developing or recognizing the above rights, and

2790-504: The labourers would continue to grow. The industrialists would continue to become more wealthy, and the labourers would continue to become poorer. Conflict theory is seen throughout relationships and interactions between two groups of people including races, opposite sexes, and religions. Max Weber and Karl Marx have two different approaches to the conflict theory. Marx supported the ideas of deviance and claimed that individuals choose to engage in such rebellious and conflicting behaviour as

2852-420: The majority may well agree are good things in and of themselves, in the language of rights, and thus grant those political goals inappropriate connotations. In his opinion, calling socio-economic goods "rights" inherently creates a related concept of " duties ", so that other citizens have to be coerced by the government to give things to other people in order to fulfill these new rights. He also has stated that, in

2914-550: The material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society. Mankind thus inevitably sets itself only such tasks as it is able to solve since closer examination will always show that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or at least in the course of formation. In broad outline, the Asiatic, ancient, feudal and modern bourgeois modes of production may be designated as epochs marking progress in

2976-407: The material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or – this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms – with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters (legcuffs). Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in

3038-646: The mere civil and social, as expressed in many progressive documents of international law , including the 1972 Stockholm Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment , the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and other pieces of generally aspirational " soft law ". Also known as Solidarity human rights , they are rights that try to go beyond the framework of individual rights to focus on collective concepts, such as community or people. However,

3100-618: The more commodities he creates. With the increasing value of the world of things proceeds in direct proportion to the devaluation of the world of men. Labour produces not only commodities; it produces itself and the worker as a commodity -- and does so in the proportion in which it produces commodities generally." A commodity is a social use value produced by its owner not for personal consumption but for exchange. Marx believed that an entrepreneur must keep up with more things as his company and power expand . That becomes more difficult each time his range of power increases. Eventually, he will become

3162-423: The other would have no impact on his life?" Hungarian socialist and political economist Karl Polanyi made the antithetical argument to Hayek in the book The Great Transformation . Polanyi wrote that an uncontrolled free market would lead to repressive economic concentration and then to a co-opting of democratic governance that degrades civil rights. The World Conference on Human Rights in 1993 opposed

SECTION 50

#1732750083124

3224-426: The power imbalance of employer-employee relationships in capitalism as a cause of inequality and often see unequal outcomes as a hindrance to equality of opportunity. They tend to identify equality of outcome as a sign of equality and therefore think that people have a right to portions of necessities such as health care or economic assistance or housing that align with their needs. In philosophy , meta-ethics

3286-423: The price of the complete abolition of personal liberty. New York University School of Law professor of law Jeremy Waldron has written in response to critics of the second-generation rights: In any case, the argument from first-generation to second-generation rights was never supposed to be a matter of conceptual analysis. It was rather this: if one is really concerned to secure civil or political liberty for

3348-429: The right of a father to be respected by his son did not indicate a right of the son to receive something in return for that respect; and the divine right of kings , which permitted absolute power over subjects, did not leave much possibility for many rights for the subjects themselves. In contrast, modern conceptions of rights have often emphasized liberty and equality as among the most important aspects of rights, as

3410-410: The second generation concept of " social justice " cannot have any practical political meaning: No state of affairs as such is just or unjust: it is only when we assume that somebody is responsible for having brought it about ... In the same sense, a spontaneously working market , where prices act as guides to action, cannot take account of what people in any sense need or deserve, because it creates

3472-402: The state of New York has enshrined the right to a free education , as well as "the right to organize and to bargain collectively ", and workers' compensation , in its constitutional law . These rights are sometimes referred to as " red " rights. They impose upon the government the duty to respect and promote and fulfill them, but this depends on the availability of resources. The duty

3534-492: The system of rights promulgated by one group has come into sharp and bitter conflict with that of other groups. In the political sphere, a place in which rights have historically been an important issue, constitutional provisions of various states sometimes address the question of who has what legal rights. Historically, many notions of rights were authoritarian and hierarchical , with different people granted different rights, and some having more rights than others. For instance,

3596-464: The term remains largely unofficial, just as the also-used moniker of " green " rights, and thus houses an extremely broad spectrum of rights, including: The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights ensures many of those: the right to self-determination, right to development, right to natural resources and right to satisfactory environment. Some countries also have constitutional mechanisms for safeguarding third-generation rights. For example,

3658-407: The upper class wants to get the most production for the least money. Surplus value is created, which the profit held onto by the industrialists from by workers producing more than the employers actually need to repay the cost of hiring labourers. Another occurrence is exploitation, which is workers receiving less money than the worth of their labour. Marx believed that the gap between industrialists and

3720-406: The victim to unlawful killings or violence. * Prohibition of torture. No human being is subjected to an unusual punishment or cruel treatments. Slavery is prohibited. There is no excuse for people to be forced to be subject to labor that they do not want to do. * Right to liberty and security- Everyone has a right to liberty unless they are imprisoned. Universal Declaration of Human Rights . There

3782-413: The workers prevail about the proper wage? Or do the "group rights" of the union regarding the proper wage prevail? The Austrian School of Economics holds that only individuals think, feel, and act whether or not members of any abstract group. The society should thus according to economists of the school be analyzed starting from the individual. This methodology is called methodological individualism and

SECTION 60

#1732750083124

3844-498: Was evident in the American and French revolutions. Important documents in the political history of rights include: Organisations: Social conflict 1800s: Martineau · Tocqueville  ·  Marx ·  Spencer · Le Bon · Ward · Pareto ·  Tönnies · Veblen ·  Simmel · Durkheim ·  Addams ·  Mead · Weber ·  Du Bois ·  Mannheim · Elias Social conflict

#123876