The kingdom of Tushara , according to ancient Indian literature , such as the epic Mahabharata , was a land located beyond north-west India. In the Mahabharata , its inhabitants, known as the Tusharas, are depicted as mlechchas ("barbarians") and fierce warriors.
63-544: Modern scholars generally see Tushara as synonymous with the historical " Tukhara ", also known as Tokhara or Tokharistan – another name for Bactria . This area was the stronghold of the Kushan Empire , which dominated India between the 1st and 3rd centuries CE. The historical Tukhara appears to be synonymous with the land known by Ancient Chinese scholars as Daxia , from the 3rd century BCE onwards. Its inhabitants were known later to Ancient Greek scholars as
126-426: A city-state, such a unit as Jericho might have become in its later stages … tribalism can be viewed as reaction to the formation of complex political structure rather than a necessary preliminary stage in its evolution. The term "tribe" was in common use in the field of anthropology until the late 1950s and 1960s. The continued use of the term has attracted controversy among anthropologists and other academics active in
189-696: A colony of the Romans near the port of Barbaricum in Sindhu Delta. This shows that a section of the Tusharas had also moved to western India and was living there around Vrahamihira's time. There is also a mention of Tushara-Giri ( Tushara mountain) in the Mahabharata , Harshacharita of Bana Bhata and Kavyamimansa of Rajshekhar. ÷ Kingdom Little is known of the Tukhara before they conquered
252-505: A leadership responsive to the needs of neighboring states (the so-called tribes of the United States or British India provide good examples of this). The British favored the label "aboriginal tribe" for some communities. India adopted a republican constitution in 1950, after three years of debate in its Constituent Assembly. During the debate, Jaipal Singh, a member of Munda tribe from Central India advocated for special provisions for
315-852: A political unit formed from an organisation of families (including clans and lineages) based on social or ideological solidarity. Membership of a tribe may be understood as being based on factors such as kinship ("clan"), ethnicity ("race"), language, dwelling place, political group, religious beliefs, oral tradition and/or cultural practices . Archaeologists continue to explore the development of pre-state tribes. Current research suggests that tribal structures constituted one type of adaptation to situations providing plentiful yet unpredictable resources. Such structures proved flexible enough to coordinate production and distribution of food in times of scarcity, without limiting or constraining people during times of surplus. Anthropologist Morton Fried argued in 1967 that bands organized into tribes in order to resist
378-527: Is generally held by linguists to be a compound formed from two elements: tri- 'three' and bhu , bu , fu , a verbal root meaning 'to be'. Latin tribus is held to derive from the Proto-Indo-European compound * tri-dʰh₁u/o- ('rendered in three, tripartite division'; compare with Umbrian trifu 'trinity, district', Sanskrit trídha 'threefold'). Considerable debate has accompanied efforts to define and characterize tribes. In
441-443: Is often contrasted by anthropologists with other social and kinship groups, being hierarchically larger than a lineage or clan , but smaller than a chiefdom , ethnicity , nation or state . These terms are similarly disputed. In some cases tribes have legal recognition and some degree of political autonomy from national or federal government, but this legalistic usage of the term may conflict with anthropological definitions. In
504-602: Is the first recorded visit of people from India to Japan. Tokharistan Tokharistan (formed from "Tokhara" and the suffix -stan meaning "place of" in Persian) is an ancient Early Middle Ages name given to the area which was known as Bactria in Ancient Greek sources. By the 6th century CE Tokharistan came under rule of the First Turkic Khaganate , and in the 7th and 8th centuries it
567-550: Is the result of a borrowing from a Romance language source (such as Old French tribu ) or if the form is a result of borrowing directly from Latin (the Middle English plural tribuz 1250 may be a direct representation of Latin plural tribūs ). Modern English tribe may also be a result of a common pattern wherein English borrows nouns directly from Latin and drops suffixes, including -us . Latin tribus
630-669: The Greco-Bactrian Kingdom in the 2nd century BCE. They are known, in subsequent centuries, to have spoken Bactrian , an Eastern Iranian language . The Yuezhi are generally believed to have had their ethnogenesis in Gansu , China. However, Ancient Chinese sources use the term Daxia ( Tukhara ) for a state in Central Asia, two centuries before the Yuezhi entered the area. Hence the Tukhara may have been recruited by
693-886: The Kumijis of Al-Maqidisi, Al-Baihaki, Nasir Khusau etc.) who lived in Buttamen Mountains (now in Tajikistan) in the upper Oxus are believed by many scholars to be the Kambojas who were living neighbors to the Tukhara/Tusharas north of the Hindukush in the Oxus valley. The region was also known as Kumudadvipa of the Puranic texts, which the scholars identify with Sanskrit Kamboja. Before its occupation by
SECTION 10
#1732780949042756-675: The Kuru and Panchala kingdoms . They were followers of the Vedic culture . The Yadavas made central and western India their stronghold. The descendants of Anu, known as the Anavas , are said to have migrated to Iran . Various regional terms and proper names may have originated with, or been derived from, the Tusharas including: Takhar Province in Afghanistan; the Pakistani village of Thakra;
819-765: The Kurus and fought wrathfully for Duryodhana ’s sake (8:73). A number of Saka and Tukhara and Yavana horsemen, accompanied by some of the foremost combatants among the Kambojas , quickly rushed against Arjuna (8:88). F. E Pargiter writes that the Tusharas, along with the Yavanas, Shakas, Khasas and Daradas had collectively joined the Kamboja army of Sudakshina Kamboj and had fought in Kurukshetra war under latter's supreme command. Puranic texts like Vayu Purana , Brahmanda Purana and Vamana Purana , etc., associate
882-704: The Mahabharata associates the Tusharas with the Yavanas, Kiratas , Chinas , Kambojas , Pahlavas , Kankas, Sabaras, Barbaras, Ramathas etc., and brands them all as barbaric tribes of Uttarapatha , leading lives of Dasyus . The Tusharas along with numerous other tribes from the north-west, including the Bahlikas, Kiratas, Pahlavas, Paradas, Daradas, Kambojas, Shakas, Kankas, Romakas, Yavanas, Trigartas, Kshudrakas, Malavas, Angas, and Vangas had joined Yudhishtra at his Rajasuya ceremony and brought him numerous gifts such as camels, horses, cows, elephants and gold Later
945-629: The Oxus . The region used the East Iranian Bactrian language , which was current from the 2nd to the 9th century CE. The most important city of Tokharistan was Balkh , which was at the center of the trade between Iran (the Sasanian Empire ) and India. The region of Tokharistan had been outside of Sasanian control for the three centuries preceding the Muslim conquest of Persia in 633–651 CE. During that time, Tokharistan
1008-673: The Parama Kamboja ( furthest Kamboja ) land, lying between Oxus and Jaxartes , which happened prior to Achaemenid rule. Per epic evidence, Parama Kamboja was the land of the Loha-Kamboja-Rishikas . The Rishikas are said by some scholars to be the same people as the Yuezhi . The Kushanas are also said by some to be the same people. Kalhana (c. 1148-1149 CE) claims that the three kings he calls Huṣka , Juṣka and Kaniṣka (commonly interpreted to refer to Huvishka , Vāsishka and Kanishka I) were "descended from
1071-723: The Rishikas of the Mahabharata and also places them in the Sakadvipa (or Scythia ). According to Dr B. N. Puri and some other scholars, the Kambojas were a branch of the Tukharas. Based on the above Rishika-Kamboja connections, some scholars also claim that the Kambojas were a branch of the Yuezhi themselves. Dr Moti Chander also sees a close ethnic relationship between the Kambojas and the Yuezhi . Modern scholars are still debating
1134-1260: The Sakas , along with the Chulikas, stood in the right wing of the Kaurava battle-array (6:75). The Tusharas, the Yavanas , the Khasas , the Darvabhisaras, the Daradas , the Sakas , the Kamathas, the Ramathas, the Tanganas the Andhrakas , the Pulindas, the Kiratas of fierce prowess, the Mlecchas , the Mountaineers , and the races hailing from the sea-side, all endued with great wrath and great might, delighting in battle and armed with maces, these all—united with
1197-948: The Sindhavas and the Jagudas and the Ramathas and the Mundas and the inhabitants of the kingdom of women and the Tanganas and the Kekayas and the Malavas and the inhabitants of Kasmira , were present in the Rajasuya sacrifice of Yudhishthira the king of the Pandavas (3:51). The Sakas and Tukhatas and Tukharas and Kankas and Romakas and men with horns bringing with them as tribute numerous large elephants and ten thousand horses, and hundreds and hundreds of millions of golds (2:50). The Tusharas were very ferocious warriors. The Yavanas and
1260-618: The Tibetan chronicle Dpag-bsam-ljon-bzah ( The Excellent Kalpa-Vrksa ), along with people like the Yavanas , Kambojas , Daradas , Hunas , Khasas etc. The Komedai of Ptolemy , the Kiumito or Kumituo of Xuanzang's accounts, Kiumizhi of Wu'kong, Kumi of the Tang Annals , Kumed or Kumadh of some Muslim writers, Cambothi, Kambuson and Komedon of the Greek writers (or
1323-752: The Tokharoi and to the Ancient Romans as Tochari . Modern scholars appear to have conflated the Tukhara with the so-called Tocharians – an Indo-European people who lived in the Tarim Basin , in present-day Xinjiang, China, until the 1st millennium. When the Tocharian languages of the Tarim were rediscovered in the early 20th century, most scholars accepted a hypothesis that they were linked to
SECTION 20
#17327809490421386-459: The Tukhara (who were known to have migrated to Central Asia from China, with the other founding Kushan peoples). However, the subjects of the Tarim kingdoms appear to have referred to themselves by names such as Agni , Kuči and Krorän . These peoples are also known to have spoken centum languages , whereas the Tukhara of Bactria spoke a satem language . The Tukhara were among Indo-European tribes that conquered Central Asia during
1449-723: The social sciences with scholars of anthropological and ethnohistorical research challenging the utility of the concept. In 1970, anthropologist J. Clyde Mitchell wrote: Despite the membership boundaries for a tribe being conceptually simple, in reality they are often vague and subject to change over time. In his 1975 study, The Notion of the Tribe , Fried provided numerous examples of tribes that encompassed members who spoke different languages and practiced different rituals, or who shared languages and rituals with members of other tribes. Similarly, he provided examples of tribes in which people followed different political leaders, or followed
1512-464: The 'Adibasi' -- a translation into Hindi of 'aboriginal'. His arguments proved persuasive. These communities were to have seats in the legislatures and positions in government employment 'reserved' for them. Each of the assembly members prepared a list of communities that deserved special protections. These names were listed in a "Schedule" (appendix) to the Constitution. So these came to be called
1575-444: The 'Scheduled Tribes', often abbreviated to ST. Second, bands could form "secondary" tribes as a means to defend against state expansion. Members of bands would form more clearly bounded and centralized polities, because such polities could begin producing surpluses that could support a standing army that could fight against states, and they would have a leadership that could co-ordinate economic production and military activities. In
1638-529: The 10th to 12th century CE. Tribe The term tribe is used in many different contexts to refer to a category of human social group . The predominant worldwide usage of the term in English is in the discipline of anthropology . Its definition is contested, in part due to conflicting theoretical understandings of social and kinship structures, and also reflecting the problematic application of this concept to extremely diverse human societies. The concept
1701-529: The 2nd century BCE, according to both Chinese and Greek sources. Ancient Chinese sources refer to these tribes collectively as the Da Yuezhi ("Greater Yuezhi "). In subsequent centuries the Tukhara and other tribes founded the Kushan Empire , which dominated Central and South Asia. The account in Mahabharata (Mbh) 1:85 depicts the Tusharas as mlechchas ("barbarians") and descendants of Anu, one of
1764-707: The 7th century CE, the Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang , by way of the " Iron Pass " entered Tukhara (覩貨羅 Pinyin Duhuoluo ; W-G Tu-huo-luo ). Xuanzang stated that it lay south of the Iron Pass, north of the "great snow mountains" ( Hindukush ), and east of Persia , with the Oxus "flowing westward through the middle of it." During the time of Xuanzang, Tukhāra was divided into 27 administrative units, each having its separate chieftain. The Tukharas ( Tho-gar ) are mentioned in
1827-560: The Parama Kambojas ), are the same as the classical Assaceni / Assacani ( Aspasio / Assakenoi of Arrian ) and the Aśvayana and Aśvakayana of Panini. They are also mentioned by Megasthenes who refers to them as Osii (= Asii ), Asoi , Aseni etc., all living on upper Indus in eastern Afghanistan . The names indicate their connection with horses and horse culture. These Osii, Asoi/Aseni clans represent earlier migration from
1890-586: The Rishikas were allied tribes . Like the "Parama Kambojas", the Rishikas of the Transoxian region are similarly styled as "Parama Rishikas". Based on the syntactical construction of the Mahabharata verse 5.5.15 and verse 2.27.25 , Ishwa Mishra believe that the Rishikas were a section of the Kambojas i.e. Parama Kambojas . V. S. Aggarwala too, relates the Parama Kambojas of the Trans-Pamirs to
1953-535: The Shakas, Yavanas and the Kambojas etc. The Tushara kingdom is mentioned in the travels of the Pandavas in the northern regions beyond the Himalayas :- Crossing the difficult Himalayan regions, and the countries of China , Tukhara, Darada and all the climes of Kulinda , rich in heaps of jewels, those warlike men reached the capital of Suvahu (3:176). The Mahabharata makes clear that Vedic Hindus did not know
Tushara - Misplaced Pages Continue
2016-638: The Tochari and the Sakarauli (Saracucse?) who are found connected with both the Tochari and the Asiani" . If the Rishikas of the Mahabharata were same as the Tukharas, then the observation from George Rawlinson is in line with the Mahabharata statement which also closely allies the Rishikas with the Parama Kambojas and places them both in the Sakadvipa. The Kambojas (i.e. the southern branch of
2079-531: The Tukhara, Badakshan formed a part of ancient Kamboja (Parama Kamboja) but, after its occupation by the Tukhara in the 2nd century BCE, Badakshan and some other territories of the Kamboja became part of Tukhara. Around the 4th to 5th century CE, when the fortunes of the Tukhara finally waned, the original population of Kambojas re-asserted itself, and the region again started to be called by its ancient name, i.e., "Kamboja", though northwestern parts still retained
2142-526: The Turuṣka race". Aurel Stein says that the Tukharas (Tokharoi/Tokarai) were a branch of the Yuezhi. P. C. Bagchi holds that the Yuezhi, Tocharioi and Tushara were identical. If he is correct, the Rishikas, Tusharas/Tukharas (Tokharoi/Tokaroi), the Kushanas and the Yuezhi, were probably either a single people, or members of a confederacy. Sabha Parva of Mahabharata states that the Parama Kambojas, Lohas and
2205-462: The Tusharas were different from the Turushakas with whom they are often confused by some writers. Pompeius Trogus remarks that the Asii were lords of the Tochari. It is generally believed that they are same as the Rishikas of the Mahabharata which people are equivalent to Asii (in Prakrit). V. S. Aggarwala also equates the Rishikas with the Asii or Asioi. In 1870, George Rawlinson commented that "The Asii or Asiani were closely connected with
2268-534: The Tusharas with the Shakas, Barbaras, Kambojas, Daradas , Viprendras, Anglaukas, Yavanas, Pahlavas etc and refer to them all as the tribes of Udichya i.e. north or north-west. The Kambojas, Daradas, Barbaras, Harsavardhanas, Cinas and the Tusharas are described as the populous races of men outside. Puranic literature further states that the Tusharas and other tribes like the Gandharas, Shakas, Pahlavas, Kambojas, Paradas, Yavanas, Barbaras, Khasa , and Lampakas, etc., would be invaded and annihilated by Lord Kalki at
2331-459: The Tusharas, Sakas and Yavanas had joined the military division of the Kambojas and participated in the Mahabharata war on the side of the Kauravas. Karna Parva of Mahabharata describes the Tusharas as very ferocious and wrathful warriors. At one place in the Mahabharata, the Tusharas are mentioned along with the Shakas and the Kankas. At another place they are in a list with the Shakas, Kankas and Pahlavas. And at other places are mentioned along with
2394-434: The Tusharas, the Kankas, the Pathavas, the Andhras , the Madrakas , the Paundras , the Pulindas, the Ramathas, the Kambojas, and several new castes of Brahmanas , Kshatriyas , Vaishyas , and the Shudras , that had sprung up in the dominions of the Arya kings. The kings of the Pahlavas and the Daradas and the various tribes of the Kiratas and Yavanas and Sakras and the Harahunas and Chinas and Tukharas and
2457-427: The United States, Native American tribes are legally considered to have "domestic dependent nation" status within the territorial United States, with a government-to-government relationship with the federal government. The modern English word tribe stems from Middle English tribu , which ultimately derives from Latin tribus . According to the Oxford English Dictionary , it remains unclear if this form
2520-445: The Yuezhi, from a people neighbouring or subject to the Greco-Bactrians. Likewise the Atharvaveda also associates the Tusharas with the Bahlikas (Bactrians), Yavanas / Yonas (Greeks) and Sakas (Indo-Scythians), as following: " Saka.Yavana.Tushara.Bahlikashcha ". It also places the Bahlikas as neighbors of the Kambojas . This may suggest suggests that the Tusharas were neighbours to these peoples, possibly in Transoxiana . In
2583-418: The arrival of the Turks . In painting, there is "Tokharistan school of art" (see Northern Buddhist art ) with examples from Kalai Kafirnigan , Kafyr Kala or Ajina Tepe , as Buddhism and Buddhist art enjoyed a renaissance, possibly owing to the sponsorships and religious tolerance of the Western Turks ( Tokhara Yabghus ). Islamic art developed with the Samanid Empire and the Ghaznavids from
Tushara - Misplaced Pages Continue
2646-431: The cursed sons of King Yayati . Yayati's eldest son Yadu , gave rise to the Yadavas and his youngest son Puru to the Pauravas that includes the Kurus and Panchalas . Only the fifth son of Puru's line was considered to be the successors of Yayati's throne, as he cursed the other four sons and denied them kingship. The Pauravas inherited the Yayati's original empire and stayed in the Gangetic plain who later created
2709-412: The details of these connections without coming to any firm consensus. According to the Nihon Shoki , the second-oldest book of classical Japanese history , in 1654 two men and two women of the Tushara Kingdom, along with one woman from Shravasti , were drive by a storm to take refuge at the former Hyūga Province in southern Kyushu . They remained for several years before setting off for home. That
2772-425: The end of Kali Yuga . And they were annihilated by king Pramiti at the end of Kali Yuga . According to Vayu Purana and Matsya Purana , river Chakshu ( Oxus or Amu Darya) flowed through the countries of Tusharas, Lampakas, Pahlavas, Paradas and the Shakas, etc. The Brihat-Katha-Manjari of Pt Kshemendra relates that around 400 CE, Gupta king Vikramaditya ( Chandragupta II ) (r. 375-413/15 CE), had "unburdened
2835-407: The figures in the Dilberjin Tepe or Balalyk Tepe paintings are characteristic of the Hephthalites (450–570 CE). In this context, parallels have been drawn with the figures from Kizil Caves in Chinese Turkestan , which seem to wear broadly similar clothing. The paintings of Balalyk Tepe would be characteristic of the court life of the Hephthalites in the first half of the 6th century CE, before
2898-1280: The modern state system. Tribes have lost their legitimacy to conduct traditional functions, such as tithing , delivering justice and defending territory, with these being replaced by states functions and institutions, such as taxation, law courts and the military. Most have suffered decline and loss of cultural identity. Some have adapted to the new political context and transformed their culture and practices in order to survive, whilst others have secured legal rights and protections. Fried proposed that most surviving tribes do not have their origin in pre-state tribes, but rather in pre-state bands. Such "secondary" tribes, he suggested, developed as modern products of state expansion. Bands comprise small, mobile, and fluid social formations with weak leadership . They do not generate surpluses, pay no taxes, and support no standing army. Fried argued that secondary tribes develop in one of two ways. First, states could set them up as means to extend administrative and economic influence in their hinterland, where direct political control costs too much. States would encourage (or require) people on their frontiers to form more clearly bounded and centralized polities, because such polities could begin producing surpluses and taxes, and would have
2961-567: The mountain ranges leaving behind their horses." According to D. C. Sircar, the Kambojas here are bracketed with the Tukharas and are shown as living in the eastern parts of the Oxus valley as neighbors of the Tukharas who were living in the western parts of that Valley. The 10th century CE Kavyamimamsa of Rajshekhar lists the Tusharas with several other tribes of the Uttarapatha viz: the Shakas, Kekeyas, Vokkanas, Hunas, Kambojas, Bahlikas, Pahlavas, Limpakas, Kulutas, Tanganas, Turusakas, Barbaras, Ramathas etc. This mediaeval era evidence shows that
3024-399: The mountain ranges leaving their horses in the battlefield. This shows that during the 8th century CE, a section of the Tusharas was living as neighbours of the Kambojas near the Oxus valley. By the 6th century CE, the Brihat Samhita of Varahamihira also locates the Tusharas with Barukachcha (Bhroach) and Barbaricum (on the Indus Delta) near the sea in western India. The Romakas formed
3087-416: The name of Duhuoluo or Tukharistan in Chinese at least until the time of the Tang dynasty . There are several later references to Kamboja of the Pamirs/Badakshan. Raghuvamsha - a 5th-century Sanskrit play by Kalidasa , attests their presence on river Vamkshu ( Oxus ) as neighbors to the Hunas (Raghu: 4.68-70). As seen above, the 7th-century Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang mentions the Kiumito/Kumito living to
3150-424: The nature, structure and practices of tribes. Writing on the Kurdish peoples, anthropologist Martin van Bruinessen argued, "the terms of standard anthropological usage, 'tribe', 'clan' and 'lineage' appear to be a straitjacket that ill fits the social reality of Kurdistan". There are further negative connotations of the term "tribe" that have reduced its use. Writing in 2013, scholar Matthew Ortoleva noted that "like
3213-414: The north of the Oxus , which may refer to Komedai of Ptolemy . which, as noted above, has been equated to Kamboja mentioned in Sanskrit texts. The 8th-century king of Kashmir , King Lalitadiya, invaded the Kambojas of the "far-spreading northern region" ( uttarāpatha ) as mentioned in the Rajatarangini of Kalhana . After encountering the Kambojas, Lalitadiya's army approached the Tuhkhāras who "fled to
SECTION 50
#17327809490423276-405: The origins of the Mlechcha tribes, who were highly skilled in weapons, warfare and material sciences, but never followed the Vedic rites properly. That the Vedic people were dealing with foreign tribes is evident in a passage from Mahabharata (12:35). It asks which duties that should be performed by the Yavanas , the Kiratas , the Gandharvas , the Chinas , the Savaras, the Barbaras, the Sakas ,
3339-413: The overlordship of the Hephthalites , who led the embassies to the Southern Liang court in the early 6th century CE. The name of " Tocharians " was mistakenly applied by early 20th century authors to the Indo-European people of the Tarim Basin , from the areas of Kucha and Agni . These scholars erroneously believed that these Indo-Europeans had originated in Tokharistan ( Bactria ), and hence applied
3402-412: The popular imagination, tribes reflect a primordial social structure from which all subsequent civilizations and states developed. Anthropologist Elman Service presented a system of classification for societies in all human cultures, based on the evolution of social inequality and the role of the state . This system of classification contains four categories: Tribes are therefore considered to be
3465-400: The sacred earth by destroying the barbarians" like the Tusharas, Shakas , Mlecchas, Kambojas , Yavanas , Parasikas , Hunas etc. The Rajatarangini of Kalhana records that king Laliditya Muktapida , the 8th-century ruler of Kashmir had invaded the tribes of the north and after defeating the Kambojas , he immediately faced the Tusharas. The Tusharas did not give a fight but fled to
3528-416: The same leaders as members of other tribes. He concluded that tribes in general are characterized by fluid boundaries, heterogeneity and dynamism, and are not parochial. Part of the difficulty with the term is that it seeks to construct and apply a common conceptual framework across diverse cultures and peoples. Different anthropologists studying different peoples therefore draw conflicting conclusions about
3591-490: The surname Thakkar , found across India; the Marathi surname Thakere , sometimes anglicised as Thackeray; the Takhar Jat clan in Rajasthan, and the Thakar tribe of Maharashtra. It is also possible that the Thakor (or Thakore) caste of Gujarat, the Thakar caste of Maharashtra and the title Thakur originated with names such as Tushara/Tukhara. The Sanskrit word thakkura "lord" may be related to such terms or may itself be derived from one of them. The Shanti Parva of
3654-531: The term "Tocharians" to them. This appellation remains in common usage although the Indo-European people of the Tarim Basin probably referred to themselves as Agni , Kuči and Krorän . In the Xi'an Stele , erected in 781 CE, the Church of the East monk Adam , author of the stele, mentioned in Syriac that his grandfather was a missionary-priest from Balkh ( Classical Syriac : ܒܠܚ , romanized: Balḥ ) in Tokharistan ( ܬܚܘܪܝܣܬܢ Taḥuristan ). Geographically, Tokharistan corresponds to
3717-406: The upper Oxus valley, between the mountain ranges of the Hindu-Kush to the south and the Pamir-Alay to the north. The area reaches west as far as the Badakshan mountains, south as far as Bamiyan . Arab sources considered Kabul as part of the southern border of Tokharistan, and Shaganiyan as part of its northern border. In a narrow sense, Tokharistan may only refer to the region south of
3780-422: The violence and exploitation of early kingdoms and states. He wrote: In fact, there is no absolute necessity for a tribal stage as defined by Sahlins and Service, no necessity, that is, for such a stage to appear in the transit from a single settlement with embedded political organization, to a complex-state structured polity. Such a developmental process could have gone on within a unit that we may conceptualize as
3843-415: The word Indian , [t]ribe is a word that has connotations of colonialism." Survival International says "It is important to make the distinction between tribal and indigenous because tribal peoples have a special status acknowledged in international law as well as problems in addition to those faced by the wider category of indigenous peoples." Few tribes today remain isolated from the development of
SECTION 60
#17327809490423906-475: Was incorporated into the Tang dynasty , administered by the Protectorate General to Pacify the West . Today, Tokharistan is fragmented between Afghanistan , Uzbekistan and Tajikistan . Several languages have used variations of the word "Tokhara" to designate the region: Several portraits of ambassadors from the region of Tokharistan are known from the Portraits of Periodical Offering of Liang , originally painted in 526–539 CE. They were at that time under
3969-421: Was under the rule of dynasties of Hunnish or Turkic origin, such as the Kidarites , the Alchon Huns and the Hephthalites . At the time of the Arab conquest, Tokharistan was under the control of the Western Turks , through the Tokhara Yabghus . Numerous artefacts exist from the art of early medieval Tokharistan, which shows influence from the Buddhist art of Gandhara. Many authors have suggested that
#41958