The Vermont Defendant Accommodation Project ("VDAP") was a two-year case study conducted by Philip J. Kinsler, Anna Saxman, and Daniel B. Fishman aimed at identifying, assessing, and accommodating the special needs of mentally retarded criminal defendants.
8-474: VDAP may refer to: Vermont Defendant Accommodation Project , a case study aimed at identifying the needs of mentally retarded criminal defendants Volcano Disaster Assistance Program , a program that responds to volcanic crises Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title VDAP . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change
16-585: The court system. In fact, the VDAP authors found that attorneys often did not believe that defendants had disabilities that they did not recognize. One solution is to make sure defendants explain answers to questions rather than accepting a simple "yes." Another solution is to train attorneys to recognize disabilities during initial client interviews. By asking clients about special education programs, IEP's, mental health and substance abuse counseling, attorneys could determine whether accommodations are appropriate in
24-538: The criminal justice system as the "institution of last resort" for disabled defendants. One successful Vermont initiative for defendant accommodation noted in the VDAP was pioneered by Associate Justice Marilyn Skoglund of the Vermont Supreme Court . Justice Skoglund conducted a study to determine the required reading level for understanding court documents. The study revealed that standard conditions of release and conditions of probation forms required
32-410: The difficulty intellectually disabled criminal defendants have navigating the criminal justice system. During the study, however, the authors found that intellectually disabled criminal defendants often have a combination of disorders, such as: The VDAP authors labeled individuals with a combination of disorders as having Horrible Life Disorder ("HLD"). This term is purposefully sensational to illustrate
40-415: The extreme challenges that individuals with multiple disorders face in life and in the criminal justice system. The first step in providing defendant accommodations to intellectually disabled defendants and defendants with HLD is recognizing signs of disability. This first step may be difficult for untrained attorneys because defendants often try to mask their disabilities during their short interaction with
48-415: The legal context. Once an intellectually disabled defendant is identified, the VDAP provides a list of accommodations to consider. First, attorneys should question whether their clients' disabilities affected the voluntariness of their consent to searches, statements, or waiver of other rights. Secondly, the court should determine whether a "cognitive facilitator" is necessary to guide the defendant through
56-585: The legal process by asking the court to use simple language or to slow down if the defendant needs further explanation. Third, the court, prosecutors, and defense counsel should ensure that defendants understand the legal obligations created by pretrial release, guilty pleas, and probation conditions. Finally, the VDAP suggests that the criminal justice system should use extensive case management for mentally disabled people and people with HLD. This approach would provide housing, sheltered employment, substance abuse counseling, and mental health services rather than using
64-433: The link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=VDAP&oldid=1138864682 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Vermont Defendant Accommodation Project The VDAP was originally conducted to understand
#803196