Misplaced Pages

#332667

38-745: The Alaska boundary dispute was a territorial dispute between the United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland , which then controlled Canada 's foreign relations. It was resolved by arbitration in 1903. The dispute had existed between the Russian Empire and Britain since 1821, and was inherited by the United States as a consequence of the Alaska Purchase in 1867. The final resolution favored

76-471: A claim involves first the discovery of a valuable mineral in quantities that a "prudent man" (the Prudent Man Rule) would invest time and expenses to recover. Next, marking the claim boundaries, typically with wooden posts or capped steel posts, which must be four feet tall, or stone cairns, which must be three feet tall. Finally, filing a claim with both the land management agency (USFS or BLM), and

114-409: A major cause of wars and terrorism , as states often try to assert their sovereignty over a territory through invasion, and non-state entities try to influence the actions of politicians through terrorism. International law does not support the use of force by one state to annex the territory of another state. The UN Charter states, "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from

152-596: A mounted Gatling gun at each post. This was still disputed territory, as many Americans believed that the head of Lake Bennett, another 12 miles (19 km) north, should be the location of the border. To back up the police in their sovereignty claim, the Canadian government also sent the Yukon Field Force, a 200-man Army unit, to the territory. The soldiers set up camp at Fort Selkirk so that they could be fairly quickly dispatched to deal with problems at either

190-542: A surge in Canadian nationalism as separate from an imperial identity. Although suspicions of the U.S. provoked by the award may have contributed to Canada's rejection of a free trade with the United States in the 1911 " reciprocity election ", historian F. W. Gibson concluded that Canadians vented their anger less upon the United States and "to a greater degree upon Great Britain for having offered such feeble resistance to American aggressiveness. The circumstances surrounding

228-562: Is also sometimes used when referring to disputed territories like Western Sahara or to refer to the claims of displaced persons. In the colonial times of the United States, American men could claim a piece of land for themselves and the claim has different level of merit according to the de facto conditions: Today, only small areas of unclaimed land remain, yet large plots of land with little economical value (e.g., in Alaska) can still be bought for very low prices. Also, in certain parts of

266-490: Is on the law of state borders, and their potential settlement also relies on international law and the Court. Land claim A land claim is "the pursuit of recognized territorial ownership by a group or individual". The phrase is usually only used with respect to disputed or unresolved land claims. Some types of land claims include aboriginal land claims , Antarctic land claims , and post-colonial land claims. The term

304-410: Is one for which the federal government has issued a patent (deed). To obtain a patent, the owner of a mining claim must prove to the federal government that the claim contains locatable minerals that can be extracted at a profit. A patented claim can be used for any purpose desired by the owner, just like any other real estate. However, Congress has ceased funding for the patenting process, so at this time

342-600: Is significant because sovereignty over land defines what constitutes a state." Therefore, the breach of a country's borders or territorial disputes pose a threat to a state's very sovereignty and the right as a person of international law. In addition, territorial disputes are sometimes brought to the International Court of Justice , as was the case in Costa Rica and Nicaragua (2005). Territorial disputes cannot be separated from international law, whose basis

380-414: The 141st degree of west longitude The vague phrase "the mountains parallel to the coast" was further qualified thus: Whenever the summit of the mountains ... shall prove to be at the distance of more than ten marine leagues from the ocean, the limit ... shall be formed by a line parallel to the winding of the coast, and which shall never exceed the distance of ten marine leagues therefrom. This part of

418-503: The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1825 . Part of the wording of the treaty was that: the said line shall ascend to the north along the channel called Portland Channel as far as the point of the continent where it strikes the 56th degree of north latitude; from this last-mentioned point, the line of demarcation shall follow the summit of the mountains situated parallel to the coast as far as the point of intersection of

SECTION 10

#1732782888333

456-557: The Homestead Act , which granted public land to farmers, and water rights in the west. The California miners spread the concept of mining claims to other mining districts all over the western United States. The US Congress legalized the practice in 1866, and amended it in the Mining Act of 1872 . All land in the public domain , that is, federal land whose use has not been restricted by the government to some specific purpose,

494-471: The Klondike gold region . The presence of gold and a large new population greatly increased the importance of the region and the desirability of fixing an exact boundary. Canada wanted an all-Canadian route from the gold fields to a seaport. There were claims that Canadian citizens were harassed by the United States as a deterrent to making any land claims . The head of Lynn Canal was the main gateway to

532-499: The Statute of Westminster . Territorial dispute Territorial disputes are often related to the possession of natural resources such as rivers , fertile farmland, mineral or petroleum resources although the disputes can also be driven by culture , religion , and ethnic nationalism . Territorial disputes often result from vague and unclear language in a treaty that set up the original boundary. Territorial disputes are

570-572: The 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States . Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention declares that "[t]he state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with other States" Also, B. T. Sumner's article mentions, "In international law and relations, ownership of territory

608-704: The American position, as Canada did not get an all-Canadian outlet from the Yukon gold fields to the sea. The disappointment and anger in Canada was directed less at the United States, and more at the British government for betraying Canadian interests in favor of healthier Anglo-American relations . In 1825 Russia and the United Kingdom signed a treaty to define the borders of their respective colonial possessions,

646-528: The British claim in toto , the line was drawn through Tongas Passage , thus giving each country a portion of its claim, but entirely disregarding the real problem involved. The original negotiators might, logically, have intended the line to be drawn either as the British claimed or as the Americans claimed; certainly they had no intention of dividing the channel islands between the two ... There can be scarcely any doubt that Lord Alverstone's final pronouncement

684-548: The Chief Justice of Ontario, who died in London on July 11, 1903, while working on the boundary commission. All sides respected Root, but he was a member of the U.S. Cabinet . Canadians ridiculed the choice of the obscure ex-Senator Turner and, especially, Lodge, a leading historian and diplomatic specialist whom they saw as unobjective. The tribunal considered six main points: The British member Lord Alverstone sided with

722-559: The Great Rapprochement ). Keenlyside and Brown wrote that Had the United States been willing to submit her case to The Hague , or to an impartial juridical body, as Canada had desired, the result would have been, in all probability, substantially the same, except that Canadians could not feel that they had been unfairly treated. ... Had justices of the United States Supreme Court been appointed in

760-505: The U.S. position on these basic issues, although the final agreed demarcation line fell significantly short of the maximal U.S. claim (it was a compromise falling roughly between the maximal U.S. and maximal Canadian claim). The "BC Panhandle" (the Tatshenshini-Alsek region ) was not quite exclaved from the rest of British Columbia. In 1929, Canadian scholar Hugh L. L. Keenlyside concluded, "The Americans, of course, did have

798-438: The United Kingdom entrusted the decision to an arbitration by a mixed tribunal of six members: three Americans ( Elihu Root , Secretary of War; Henry Cabot Lodge , senator from Massachusetts; and George Turner , ex-senator from Washington), two Canadians ( Sir Louis A. Jette , Lieutenant Governor of Quebec; and Allen B. Aylesworth , K.C., from Toronto), and one Briton ( Baron Alverstone ). Aylesworth had replaced John D. Armour ,

SECTION 20

#1732782888333

836-583: The Yukon, and the North-West Mounted Police (NWMP) sent a detachment to secure the location for Canada. This was based on Canada's assertion that that location was more than ten marine leagues from the sea, which was part of the 1825 boundary definition. A massive influx of American stampeders through Skagway very quickly forced the Canadian police to retreat. They set up posts on the desolate summits of Chilkoot and White Passes, complete with

874-476: The better case." He judged that most of the tribunal's decisions were fair. Regarding the key issue of the islands in the Portland Channel, however, there can be little doubt that the tribunal in this instance accepted a compromise, which, however justified by the political considerations involved, was a direct violation of the judicial character of the court. Instead of accepting either the American or

912-511: The coastal passes or the 141st meridian west . The posts set up on the passes by the NWMP were effective in the short term, as the provisional boundary was accepted, if grudgingly. In September 1898, serious negotiations began between the United States and Canada to settle the issue, but those meetings failed. The treaty of 1825 had been drawn up in French, and the 1903 British advocates discussed

950-461: The exact meaning of words like " côte /coast", " lisière /strip" and " crête /crest". The maps of George Vancouver , which were used as a fixing line by the commission of 1825, showed a continuous line of mountains parallel to the coast — however, the mountain range is neither parallel to the coast nor continuous. Finally, in 1903, the Hay–Herbert Treaty between the United States and

988-434: The international society, both by their relation to the fundamental right of states, sovereignty and also because they are important for international peace. International law has significant relations with territorial disputes because territorial disputes tackles the basis of international law; the state territory. International law is based on the persons of international law, which requires a defined territory, as mentioned in

1026-462: The local county registrar. There are four main types of mining claims: A mining claim always starts out as an unpatented claim. The owner of an unpatented claim must continue mining or exploration activities on an unpatented claim, or he may pay a fee to the land management agency by September 1 of each year, or it is considered abandoned and becomes null. Activities on unpatented claims must be restricted to those necessary to mining. A patented claim

1064-514: The national governments agreed on a compromise, but the government of British Columbia rejected it. U.S. President McKinley proposed a permanent lease to Canada of a port near Haines , but Canada rejected that compromise. In 1897–98 the Klondike Gold Rush in Yukon , Canada, enormously increased the population of the general area, which reached 30,000, composed largely of Americans. Some 100,000 fortune seekers moved through Alaska to

1102-563: The place of the two Senators, Canadian criticism of the award would not have been audible. The Canadian judges refused to sign the award, issued on 20 October 1903, due to the Canadian delegates' disagreement with Lord Alverstone's vote. Canadians protested the outcome, not so much the decision itself but that the Americans had chosen politicians instead of jurists for the tribunal, and that the British had helped their own interests by betraying Canada's. This led to intense anti-British emotions erupting throughout Canada (including Quebec ) as well as

1140-454: The region, but was ignored by Ottawa and London. The United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia in the Alaska Purchase , but the boundary terms were ambiguous. In 1871, British Columbia united with the new Dominion of Canada . The Canadian government requested a survey of the boundary, but the United States rejected it as too costly; the border area was very remote and sparsely settled, and without economic or strategic interest. In 1898,

1178-444: The right to mine to the first one to discover the mineral deposit and begin mining it. The area that could be claimed by one person was limited to that which could be mined by a single individual or a small group. The US system of mining claims is an application of the legal theory of prior appropriation , by which public property is granted to the first one to put it to beneficial use. Other applications of appropriation theory were

Alaska boundary dispute - Misplaced Pages Continue

1216-600: The settlement of the dispute produced serious dissatisfaction with Canada's position in the British Empire." Infuriated, like most Canadians, Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier explained to Parliament, "So long as Canada remains a dependency of the British Crown the present powers that we have are not sufficient for the maintenance of our rights." Canadian anger gradually subsided, but the feeling that Canada should control its own foreign policy may have contributed to

1254-617: The threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations." In some cases in which the boundary is not demarcated, such as the Taiwan Strait , and Kashmir , the parties involved define a Line of Control , which serves as the de facto international border. Territorial disputes have significant meaning in

1292-665: The treaty language was an agreement on general principles for establishing a boundary in the area in the future, rather than any exact demarcated line. Signed in 1839, the RAC–HBC Agreement created an understanding between the Russian-American Company and the Hudson's Bay Company . Typically referred to as the lisière (edge), a stretch of the Alaskan Panhandle from Cross Sound to 54° 40′

1330-476: The world, land can still be obtained by making productive use of it. A mining claim is the claim of the right to extract minerals from a tract of public land. In the United States, the practice began with the California gold rush of 1849. In the absence of organized government, the miners in each new mining camp made up their own rules, and to a large extent adopted Mexican mining law. The Mexican law gave

1368-659: Was given to the HBC as a fur trade monopoly in exchange for the agricultural and pastoral products produced by its subsidiary, the Puget Sound Agricultural Company , along with an annual amount of furs given to the Russian company. The lease was renewed until the end of Russian America . This lease was later brought up by the Province of British Columbia as bearing upon its own territorial interests in

1406-598: Was merely an attempt to rationalize a political expedient ... In all but one case they seem justified by the facts, and yet that one case of political compromise tarnished the whole award. This was one of several concessions that Britain offered to the United States (the others being on fisheries and the Panama Canal). It was part of a general policy of ending the chill in Britain–U.S. relations, achieving rapprochement, winning American favor, and resolving outstanding issues (

1444-662: Was subject to being claimed. The mining law has been changed numerous times, but still retains some features similar to those settled on by the California 49ers . The concept was also used in other countries, for example during the Australian gold rushes which occurred at a similar time starting from the 1850s, and included similar groups of people including miners that migrated from the American gold rushes. The Oriental Claims in Victoria are one example of this. Staking

#332667