The rituals of the Argei were archaic religious observances in ancient Rome that took place on March 16 and March 17 , and again on May 14 or May 15 . By the time of Augustus , the meaning of these rituals had become obscure even to those who practiced them. For the May rites, a procession of pontiffs , Vestals , and praetors made its way around a circuit of 27 stations ( sacella or sacraria ), where at each they retrieved a figure fashioned into human form from rush, reed, and straw, resembling men tied hand and foot. After all the stations were visited, the procession, accompanied by the Flaminica Dialis in mourning guise, moved to the Pons Sublicius , the oldest known bridge in Rome, where the gathered figures were tossed into the Tiber River .
47-492: Both the figures ( effigies or simulacra ) and the stations or shrines were called Argei , the etymology of which remains undetermined. The continuation of these rites into the later historical period when they were no longer understood demonstrates how strongly traditionalist the Romans were in matters of religion. Before the ritual commenced, an effigy was placed in each of the 27 (or in some sources 24 or 30) shrines of
94-496: A cloud formation sheltering a deity in a thangka or covering the auspice of a sacred mountain in the natural environment may be discerned as a simulacrum of an "auspicious canopy" (Sanskrit: Chhatra ) of the Ashtamangala . Perceptions of religious imagery in natural phenomena approach a cultural universal and may be proffered as evidence of the natural creative spiritual engagement of the experienced environment endemic to
141-460: A final diairesis through the collection of the five definitions of sophistry. Since these five definitions share in common one quality (sameness), which is the imitation , he finally qualifies sophistry as imitation art . Following the division of the imitation art in copy-making and appearance-making , he discovers that sophistry falls under the appearance-making art , namely the Sophist imitates
188-594: A minor role, the elder mathematician Theodorus , the young mathematician Theaetetus , and a visitor from Elea , the hometown of Parmenides and Zeno , who is often referred to in English translations as the Eleatic Stranger or the Eleatic Visitor. Other young mathematicians are also silently present. The dialogue begins when Socrates arrives and asks the Eleatic Stranger, whether in his homeland,
235-470: A natural link, (an essential foundation) with their "nominatum". This author argues that Plato accepts Cratylus' thesis. Finally, the concept of language and of “true discourse” of Cratylus will be very important for the study of diairetic dialectic in the ‘Sophist’. This dialogue takes place a day after Plato's Theaetetus in an unspecified gymnasium in Athens . The participants are Socrates , who plays
282-422: A painting is created by copying a photograph that is itself a copy of the real thing. Other art forms that play with simulacra include trompe-l'œil , pop art , Italian neorealism , and French New Wave . Simulacra have long been of interest to philosophers. In his Sophist , Plato speaks of two kinds of image-making. The first is a faithful reproduction, attempted to copy precisely the original. The second
329-424: A pupil of the old Heraclitus , who supported the full expression of the essence of the “nominatum” in the name, and who considered the names as expressions forged by an Onomaturge, capable of expressing the essence of the thing named. Following this research, all the ‘Sophist’ is dedicated to find the right definition of the name “sophist”. Some contemporary scholars, based on their orientations, have argued that in
376-518: A simulacrum is not a copy of the real, but becomes truth in its own right: the hyperreal . According to Baudrillard, what the simulacrum copies either had no original or no longer has an original, since a simulacrum signifies something it is not, and therefore leaves the original unable to be located. Where Plato saw two types of representation—faithful and intentionally distorted (simulacrum)—Baudrillard sees four: (1) basic reflection of reality; (2) perversion of reality; (3) pretence of reality (where there
423-428: A verb and a name. The name refers to the subject, and because a thought or a speech is always about something, and it cannot be about nothing ( Non-Being ). The verb is the sign of the action that the subject performs or the action being performed to or on the subject. When the verb states something that is about the subject, namely one of his properties, then the statement is true. While when the verb states something that
470-434: A viewer will pick up on these features and be able to identify the subject, even though the caricature bears far less actual resemblance to the subject. Beer (1999: p. 11) employs the term "simulacrum" to denote the formation of a sign or iconographic image, whether iconic or aniconic , in the landscape or greater field of Thangka art and Tantric Buddhist iconography . For example, an iconographic representation of
517-462: Is different ( it is not ) from the properties of the subject, then the statement is false, but is not attributing being to non-being. It is plausible then, that ‘ things that are not (appearing and seeming) somehow are ’, and so it is also plausible that the sophist produces false appearances and imitates the wise man. After having solved all these puzzles, that is to say the interrelation between being, not-being, difference and negation, as well as
SECTION 10
#1732765414596564-543: Is a copy of a copy, or "a simulacrum to the second power". In 1975, Italian author Umberto Eco argued that at Disney's parks, "we not only enjoy a perfect imitation, we also enjoy the conviction that imitation has reached its apex and afterwards reality will always be inferior to it". Examining the impact of Disney's simulacrum of national parks , Disney's Wilderness Lodge , environmentalist Jennifer Cypher and anthropologist Eric Higgs expressed worry that "the boundary between artificiality and reality will become so thin that
611-433: Is a perfect model of all the entangled orders of simulacra. [...] Play of illusions and phantasms. Las Vegas – the absolute advertising city (of the 1950s, of the crazy years of advertising, which has retained the charm of that era). Sophist (dialogue) The Sophist ( Greek : Σοφιστής ; Latin : Sophista ) is a Platonic dialogue from the philosopher's late period, most likely written in 360 BC. In it
658-470: Is a representation or imitation of a person or thing. The word was first recorded in the English language in the late 16th century, used to describe a representation, such as a statue or a painting, especially of a god . By the late 19th century, it had gathered a secondary association of inferiority: an image without the substance or qualities of the original. Literary critic Fredric Jameson offers photorealism as an example of artistic simulacrum, in which
705-471: Is a simulation: a facade meant to fool the viewer into thinking that he or she is seeing the real thing. The concept is used in the Russian-speaking world as well as in English and in other languages. Potemkin village belongs to a genus of phenomena that proliferated in post-Soviet space. Those phenomena describe gaps between external appearances and underlying realities. Disneyland – Disneyland
752-462: Is essential is that we find in these systems no prior identity , no internal resemblance ". Alain Badiou , in speaking with reference to Nazism about Evil, writes, "fidelity to a simulacrum, unlike fidelity to an event, regulates its break with the situation not by the universality of the void, but by the closed particularity of an abstract set ... (the 'Germans' or the 'Aryans')". According to
799-432: Is intentionally distorted in order to make the copy appear correct to viewers. He gives the example of Greek statuary , which was crafted larger on the top than on the bottom so that viewers on the ground would see it correctly. If they could view it in scale, they would realize it was malformed. This example from the visual arts serves as a metaphor for the philosophical arts and the tendency of some philosophers to distort
846-515: Is no model); and (4) simulacrum, which "bears no relation to any reality whatsoever". In Baudrillard's concept, like Nietzsche's, simulacra are perceived as negative, but another modern philosopher who addressed the topic, Gilles Deleuze , takes a different view, seeing simulacra as the avenue by which an accepted ideal or "privileged position" could be "challenged and overturned". Deleuze defines simulacra as "those systems in which different relates to different by means of difference itself. What
893-413: Is silent, it is difficult to attribute the views put forward by the Eleatic Stranger to Plato, beyond the difficulty inherent in taking any character to be an author's "mouthpiece". The main objective of the dialogue is to identify what a sophist is and how a sophist differs from a philosopher and statesman. Because each seems distinguished by a particular form of knowledge, the dialogue continues some of
940-405: Is that rest and change both "are," that is, both are beings; Parmenides had said that only rest "is." Furthermore, Being is a "kind" that all existing things share in common. Sameness is a "kind" that all things which belong to the same kind or genus share with reference to a certain attribute, and due to which diaeresis through collection is possible. Difference is a "kind" that makes things of
987-413: Is true with the collection of learning, recognition, commerce, combat and hunting, which can be grouped into the kind of acquisitive art . After these two collections, he proceeds to the division of the types of expertise into production and acquisition . Then he tries to find out to which of these two sub-kinds the fisherman belongs (classification) case, the acquisitive kind of expertise. By following
SECTION 20
#17327654145961034-606: The Beaubourg effect in which the Pompidou Centre functions as a monument of a mass simulation that absorbs and devours all the cultural energy from its surrounding areas. According to Baudrillard, the Centre Pompidou is "a machine for making emptiness". An everyday use of the simulacrum are the false facades, used during renovations to hide and imitate the real architecture underneath it. A Potemkin village
1081-512: The Cratylus Plato gave his assent now to the thesis of Hermogenes, now to the thesis of Cratylus. Gérard Genette , in the work ‘Mimologique. Voyage en Cratilie’ (1976), starts from Plato's speech to argue the idea of arbitrariness of the sign: according to this thesis, already supported by the great linguist Ferdinand de Saussure , the connection between language and objects is not natural, but culturally determined. The ideas developed in
1128-535: The Cratylus , although dated, have historically been an important point of reference in the development of Linguistics . On the basis of the Cratylus , Gaetano Licata has reconstructed, in the essay ‘Plato’s theory of language. Perspectives on the concept of truth’ (2007, Il Melangolo), the relationship between the Cratylus and the ‘Sophist’ and the Platonic conception of semantics, according to which names have
1175-517: The human psychology . Simulacra often appear in speculative fiction . Examples of simulacra in the sense of artificial or supernaturally or scientifically created artificial life forms include: Also, the illusions of absent loved ones created by an alien life form in Stanislaw Lem 's Solaris can be considered simulacra. Architecture is a special form of simulacrum. In his book Simulacra and Simulation, Jean Baudrillard describes
1222-520: The Argei (sacra Argeorum) throughout the Servian regions . The effigies were thought to absorb pollution within the area, and their subsequent sacrifice was a ritual purification of the city. The pontiffs and Vestals were the main celebrants. The exact route of the procession among the stations is unclear. According to Ovid , the ritual had been established as a sacrifice to the god Saturn as
1269-494: The Caribbean and theme park simulacra, with videos playing inside the installation. An interesting example of simulacrum is caricature . When an artist produces a line drawing that closely approximates the facial features of a real person, the subject of the sketch cannot be easily identified by a random observer; it can be taken for a likeness of any individual. However, a caricaturist exaggerates prominent facial features, and
1316-471: The Romans themselves. Ovid puts another interpretation in the mouth of Tiberinus , the god who personified the river. Since these early inhabitants were of Greek origin, he said, they grew homesick in their old age and asked to be buried in the river as a kind of symbolic return to their homeland in death. While this last interpretation appears irreconcilable with the previous, it may be reminiscent of burial practices in water which are attested in many parts of
1363-412: The artificial will become the centre of moral value". Eco also refers to commentary on watching sports as sports to the power of three, or sports cubed. First, there are the players who participate in the sport (the real), then the onlookers merely witnessing it, and finally the commentary on the act of witnessing the sport. Visual artist Paul McCarthy has created entire installations based on Pirates of
1410-470: The collected kinds. At first, he starts using a mundane model (a fisherman), which shares some qualities in common with the target kind (the sophist). This common quality is the certain expertise ( techne ) in one subject. Then through the method of collection of different kinds (farming, caring for mortal bodies, for things that are put together or fabricated and imitation), he tries to bring them together into one kind, which he calls productive art . The same
1457-402: The companions of Evander and later those of Hercules who had decided to stay on and live there. This responsum predated the founding of Rome . One way to interpret the ritual of the Argei was that early inhabitants of what was to become Rome had practiced human sacrifice as prescribed; Ovid insists, however, that Hercules had put an end to it, and that human sacrifice was never a practice of
Argei - Misplaced Pages Continue
1504-545: The interlocutors, led by Eleatic Stranger employ the method of division in order to classify and define the sophist and describe his essential attributes and differentia vis a vis the philosopher and statesman . Like its sequel, the Statesman , the dialogue is unusual in that Socrates is present but plays only a minor role. Instead, the Eleatic Stranger takes the lead in the discussion. Because Socrates
1551-587: The lines of inquiry pursued in the epistemological dialogue, Theaetetus , which is said to have taken place the day before. Because the Sophist treats these matters, it is often taken to shed light on Plato 's Theory of Forms and is compared with the Parmenides , which criticized what is often taken to be the theory of forms. In Cratylus , contemporary or slightly preceding the Republic , Plato poses
1598-574: The philosopher Florent Schoumacher, in societies of hypermodernity , in the West, the social contract states that we are obliged to use “simulacra”. We are carried there by hubris ( hubris ). However, the contemporary notion of simulacrum assumes that we all have a biased relationship with the reality of the world, not because reality is not accessible, but because we wish not to see things as they appear. The philosopher nevertheless emphasizes that our capacity for aphairesis , our capacity for representing
1645-402: The problem, decisive for the use of dialectics for cognitive purposes, of the relationship between name and thing, between word and reality. Thus the ‘Sophist’ has its major background in the Cratylus . This dialogue is resolved in a contrast between the thesis of Hermogenes, who considers the name a simple sequence of sounds conventionally chosen to refer to an object, and the thesis of Cratylus,
1692-461: The procedure of definition. In other words, he has to clarify what is the nature of the Being ( that which is ), Not-Being, sameness (identity), difference, motion (change), and rest, and how they are interrelated. Therefore, he examines Parmenides ’ notion in comparison with Empedocles and Heraclitus ’ in order to find out whether Being is identical with change or rest , or both. The conclusion
1739-528: The process of comparison of the distinguished kinds through his method of collection, the Eleatic Stranger discovers some attributes in relation to which the kinds can be divided (difference in relation to something). These are similar to the Categories of Aristotle , so to say: quantity, quality, relation, location, time, position, end, etc. After having failed to define sophistry, the Stranger attempts
1786-600: The result of a responsum from Jupiter Fatidicus, the oracle of Dodona . But the meaning of the ritual had already become obscure, and Ovid offers an antiquarian range of explanations. The responsum had prescribed human sacrifice , one man for each one of the gentes (families or clans) living near the banks of the Tiber . This early population was believed to have been of Greek origin, and hence Argei derived from Argivi (the Greek ethnonym "Argives"), specifically
1833-428: The same genus distinct from one another; therefore it enables us to proceed to their division. Finally, so-called Not-Being is not the opposite of Being, but simply different from it. Therefore, the negation of Being is identified with "difference." Not-being is difference, not the opposite of Being. Following these conclusions, the true statement can be distinguished from the false one, since each statement consists of
1880-450: The same method, namely, diairesis through collection, he divides the acquisitive art into possession taking and exchanging goods , to which sophistry belongs. The sophist is a kind of merchant. After many successive collections and divisions he finally arrives at the definition of the model (fisherman). Throughout this process the Eleatic Stranger classifies many kinds of activities (hunting, aquatic-hunting, fishing, strike-hunting). After
1927-401: The sophist couldn't "do" anything with it. The Stranger suggests that it is Parmenides' doctrine of being and non-being that is at the root of this problem, and so proceeds to criticize Parmenides' ideas, namely that "it is impossible that things that are not are." The Eleatic Stranger, before proceeding to the final definition of sophistry, has to make clear the concepts that he used throughout
Argei - Misplaced Pages Continue
1974-482: The sophist, statesperson, and philosopher are considered to be one kind or three. The Eleatic Stranger responds that they are three and then sets about to give an account of the sophist through dialectical exchange with Theaetetus. The Eleatic Stranger pursues a different definition than features in Plato's other dialogues by using a model, comparing the model with the target kind, collection, and division ( diairesis ) of
2021-632: The truth so that it appears accurate unless viewed from the proper angle. Nietzsche addresses the concept of simulacrum (but does not use the term) in the Twilight of the Idols , suggesting that most philosophers, by ignoring the reliable input of their senses and resorting to the constructs of language and reason, arrive at a distorted copy of reality. French semiotician and social theorist Jean Baudrillard argues in Simulacra and Simulation that
2068-662: The verbal explanation of the model (definition), he tries to find out what the model and the target kind share in common (sameness) and what differentiates them (difference). Through this comparison, and after having been aware of the different kinds and sub-kinds, he can classify sophistry also among the other branches of the ‘tree’ of division of expertise as follows: "1. production, hunting by persuasion and money-earning, 2. acquisition, soul wholesaling, 3. soul retailing, retailing things that others make, 4. soul retailing, retailing things that he makes himself, 5. possession taking, competition, money-making expertise in debating." Throughout
2115-447: The wise man. The sophist is presented negatively, but he can be said to be someone who merely pretends to have knowledge or to be a purveyor of false knowledge only if right opinion and false opinion can be distinguished. It seems impossible to say that the sophist presents things that are not as though they were, or passes off "non-being" as "being," since this would suggest that non-being exists, or that non-existence exists. Otherwise,
2162-497: The world among primitive peoples. Dionysius of Halicarnassus also explains the ritual in terms of human sacrifice, saying that Tiberinus was the recipient of these regular offerings. Alternative modern interpretations include a pre- Imperial rainmaking rite, or an annual re-enactment of the execution by drowning of 27 Greek war captives. Simulacrum A simulacrum ( pl. : simulacra or simulacrums , from Latin simulacrum , meaning "likeness, semblance")
2209-520: The world, does indeed exist. Recreational simulacra include reenactments of historical events or replicas of landmarks, such as Colonial Williamsburg and the Eiffel Tower , and constructions of fictional or cultural ideas, such as Fantasyland at The Walt Disney Company 's Magic Kingdom . The various Disney parks have been regarded as the ultimate recreational simulacra by some philosophers, with Baudrillard noting that Walt Disney World Resort
#595404