Misplaced Pages

#242757

98-487: C-bomb could mean: Cobalt bomb - a type of doomsday device. Cunt - an English-language profanity which is widely considered to be particularly strong. C-bomb (PlayStation Network) - a problem with the PlayStation Network online gaming service Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with

196-410: A hohlraum or radiation case. The "George" shot of Operation Greenhouse of 9 May 1951 tested the basic concept for the first time on a very small scale. As the first successful (uncontrolled) release of nuclear fusion energy, which made up a small fraction of the 225  kt (940  TJ ) total yield, it raised expectations to a near certainty that the concept would work. On 1 November 1952,

294-658: A cobalt bomb was originally described in a radio program by physicist Leó Szilárd on February 26, 1950. His intent was not to propose that such a weapon be built, but to show that nuclear weapon technology would soon reach the point where a doomsday device could end human life on Earth. The Operation Antler /Round 1 test by the British at the Tadje site in the Maralinga range in Australia on September 14, 1957, tested

392-736: A secondary section that consists of fusion fuel . The energy released by the primary compresses the secondary through the process of radiation implosion , at which point it is heated and undergoes nuclear fusion . This process could be continued, with energy from the secondary igniting a third fusion stage; the Soviet Union's AN602 " Tsar Bomba " is thought to have been a three-stage fission-fusion-fusion device. Theoretically by continuing this process thermonuclear weapons with arbitrarily high yield could be constructed. This contrasts with fission weapons, which are limited in yield because only so much fission fuel can be amassed in one place before

490-488: A bomb using cobalt pellets as a radiochemical tracer for estimating nuclear weapon yield . This was considered a failure, and the experiment was not repeated. In Russia, the triple " taiga " nuclear salvo test, as part of the preliminary March 1971 Pechora–Kama Canal project, produced relatively high amounts of cobalt-60 ( Co or Co-60) from the steel that surrounded the taiga devices, with this fusion -generated neutron activation product being responsible for about half of

588-436: A cobalt bomb is genuine. Amongst other comments on it, Edward Moore Geist wrote a paper in which he says that "Russian decision makers would have little confidence that these areas would be in the intended locations" and Russian military experts are cited as saying that "robotic torpedoes could have other purposes, such as delivering deep-sea equipment or installing surveillance devices." A cobalt bomb could be made by placing

686-475: A cobalt bomb with equipment such as excavators and bulldozers covered with lead glass , similar to those employed at the cleanup of the Semipalatinsk Test Site . By skimming off the thin layer of fallout on the topsoil and burying it in the likes of a deep trench along with isolating it from ground water sources, the gamma air dose is cut by orders of magnitude. The decontamination after

784-511: A cobalt bomb. It is not known whether the Status-6 is a real project or whether it is Russian disinformation. In 2018 the Pentagon's annual Nuclear Posture Review stated Russia is developing a system called the "Status-6 Oceanic Multipurpose System". If Status-6 does exist, it is not publicly known whether the leaked 2015 design is accurate or whether the 2015 claim that the torpedo might be

882-430: A design could not produce thermonuclear weapons whose explosive yields could be made arbitrarily large (unlike U.S. designs at that time). The fusion layer wrapped around the fission core could only moderately multiply the fission energy (modern Teller–Ulam designs can multiply it 30-fold). Additionally, the whole fusion stage had to be imploded by conventional explosives, along with the fission core, substantially increasing

980-498: A dozen megatons, which was generally considered enough to destroy even the most hardened practical targets (for example, a control facility such as the Cheyenne Mountain Complex ). Even such large bombs have been replaced by smaller yield nuclear bunker buster bombs. For destruction of cities and non-hardened targets, breaking the mass of a single missile payload down into smaller MIRV bombs in order to spread

1078-456: A few specific incidents outlined in a section below. The basic principle of the Teller–Ulam configuration is the idea that different parts of a thermonuclear weapon can be chained together in stages, with the detonation of each stage providing the energy to ignite the next stage. At a minimum, this implies a primary section that consists of an implosion-type fission bomb (a "trigger"), and

SECTION 10

#1732780758243

1176-453: A high-yield explosion. A W88 warhead manages to yield up to 475 kilotonnes of TNT (1,990 TJ) with a physics package 68.9 inches (1,750 mm) long, with a maximum diameter of 21.8 inches (550 mm), and by different estimates weighing in a range from 175 to 360 kilograms (386 to 794 lb). The smaller warhead allows more of them to fit onto a single missile and improves basic flight properties such as speed and range. The idea of

1274-507: A highly penetrating radiation spread evenly over the body so the tissue type weighting factor will also be 1. Assume a cobalt bomb deposits intense fallout causing a dose rate of 10 Sv per hour. At this dose rate, any unsheltered person exposed to the fallout would receive a lethal dose in about 30 minutes (assuming a median lethal dose of 5 Sv ). People in well-built shelters would be safe due to radiation shielding . It may be possible to decontaminate relatively small areas contaminated by

1372-488: A massive effort was mounted to re-invent the process. An impurity crucial to the properties of the old Fogbank was omitted during the new process. Only close analysis of new and old batches revealed the nature of that impurity. The manufacturing process used acetonitrile as a solvent , which led to at least three evacuations of the Fogbank plant in 2006. Widely used in the petroleum and pharmaceutical industries, acetonitrile

1470-576: A possibility. It was first used in thermonuclear weapons with the W76 thermonuclear warhead and produced at a plant in the Y-12 Complex at Oak Ridge, Tennessee , for use in the W76. Production of Fogbank lapsed after the W76 production run ended. The W76 Life Extension Program required more Fogbank to be made. This was complicated by the fact that the original Fogbank's properties were not fully documented, so

1568-421: A quantity of ordinary cobalt metal ( Co) around a thermonuclear weapon . When the bomb explodes, the neutrons produced by the fusion reaction in the secondary stage of the thermonuclear bomb's explosion would transmute the cobalt to the radioactive cobalt-60, which would be vaporized by the explosion. The cobalt would then condense and fall back to Earth with the dust and debris from the explosion, contaminating

1666-485: A thermal barrier to keep the fusion fuel filler from becoming too hot, which would spoil the compression. If made of uranium , enriched uranium or plutonium, the tamper captures fast fusion neutrons and undergoes fission itself, increasing the overall explosive yield . Additionally, in most designs the radiation case is also constructed of a material that undergoes fission driven by fast thermonuclear neutrons. Such bombs are classified as two stage weapons. Fast fission of

1764-602: A thermonuclear fusion bomb ignited by a smaller fission bomb was first proposed by Enrico Fermi to his colleague Edward Teller when they were talking at Columbia University in September 1941, at the start of what would become the Manhattan Project . Teller spent much of the Manhattan Project attempting to figure out how to make the design work, preferring it over work on the atomic bomb, and over

1862-557: Is a second-generation nuclear weapon design . Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs , a more compact size, a lower mass, or a combination of these benefits. Characteristics of nuclear fusion reactions make possible the use of non-fissile depleted uranium as the weapon's main fuel, thus allowing more efficient use of scarce fissile material such as uranium-235 ( U ) or plutonium-239 ( Pu ). The first full-scale thermonuclear test ( Ivy Mike )

1960-558: Is complete. The 5.27 year half-life of the Co is long enough to allow it to settle out before significant decay has occurred and to render it impractical to wait in shelters for it to decay, yet short enough that intense radiation is produced. Many isotopes are more radioactive ( gold-198 , tantalum-182 , zinc-65 , sodium-24 , and many more), but they would decay faster, possibly allowing some population to survive in shelters. Fission products are more deadly than neutron-activated cobalt in

2058-461: Is flammable and toxic. Y-12 is the sole producer of Fogbank. A simplified summary of the above explanation is: How exactly the energy is "transported" from the primary to the secondary has been the subject of some disagreement in the open press but is thought to be transmitted through the X-rays and gamma rays that are emitted from the fissioning primary . This energy is then used to compress

SECTION 20

#1732780758243

2156-487: Is omitted, by replacing the uranium tamper with one made of lead , for example, the overall explosive force is reduced by approximately half but the amount of fallout is relatively low. The neutron bomb is a hydrogen bomb with an intentionally thin tamper, allowing as many of the fast fusion neutrons as possible to escape. Current technical criticisms of the idea of "foam plasma pressure" focus on unclassified analysis from similar high energy physics fields that indicate that

2254-529: Is one order of magnitude greater than the higher proposed plasma pressures and nearly two orders of magnitude greater than calculated radiation pressure. No mechanism to avoid the absorption of energy into the radiation case wall and the secondary tamper has been suggested, making ablation apparently unavoidable. The other mechanisms appear to be unneeded. United States Department of Defense official declassification reports indicate that foamed plastic materials are or may be used in radiation case liners, and despite

2352-515: Is the Soviet early Sloika design. In essence, the Teller–Ulam configuration relies on at least two instances of implosion occurring: first, the conventional (chemical) explosives in the primary would compress the fissile core, resulting in a fission explosion many times more powerful than that which chemical explosives could achieve alone (first stage). Second, the radiation from the fissioning of

2450-426: Is the fusion fuel, usually a form of lithium deuteride , which is used because it is easier to weaponize than liquefied tritium/deuterium gas. This dry fuel, when bombarded by neutrons, produces tritium, a heavy isotope of hydrogen that can undergo nuclear fusion, along with the deuterium present in the mixture. (See the article on nuclear fusion for a more detailed technical discussion of fusion reactions.) Inside

2548-446: Is the medium by which the outside pressure (force acting on the surface area of the secondary) is transferred to the mass of fusion fuel. The proposed tamper-pusher ablation mechanism posits that the outer layers of the thermonuclear secondary's tamper-pusher are heated so extremely by the primary's X-ray flux that they expand violently and ablate away (fly off). Because total momentum is conserved, this mass of high velocity ejecta impels

2646-416: Is the primary example). Such processes have resulted in a body of unclassified knowledge about nuclear bombs that is generally consistent with official unclassified information releases and related physics and is thought to be internally consistent, though there are some points of interpretation that are still considered open. The state of public knowledge about the Teller–Ulam design has been mostly shaped from

2744-552: Is thought to be a standard implosion method fission bomb, though likely with a core boosted by small amounts of fusion fuel (usually 1:1 deuterium : tritium gas) for extra efficiency; the fusion fuel releases excess neutrons when heated and compressed, inducing additional fission. When fired, the Pu or U core would be compressed to a smaller sphere by special layers of conventional high explosives arranged around it in an explosive lens pattern, initiating

2842-495: Is thought to have used multiple stages (including more than one tertiary fusion stage) in their 50 Mt (210 PJ) (100 Mt (420 PJ) in intended use) Tsar Bomba. The fissionable jacket could be replaced with lead, as was done with the Tsar Bomba. If any hydrogen bombs have been made from configurations other than those based on the Teller–Ulam design, the fact of it is not publicly known. A possible exception to this

2940-409: Is widely assumed to be beryllium , which fits that description and would also moderate the neutron flux from the primary. Some material to absorb and re-radiate the X-rays in a particular manner may also be used. Candidates for the "special material" are polystyrene and a substance called " Fogbank ", an unclassified codename. Fogbank's composition is classified, though aerogel has been suggested as

3038-428: The Co again after about 75 years. Complete 100% conversion into Co-60 is unlikely; a 1957 British experiment at Maralinga showed that Co-59's neutron absorption ability was much lower than predicted, resulting in a very limited formation of Co-60 isotope in practice. In addition, fallout is not deposited evenly throughout the path downwind from a detonation, so some areas would be relatively unaffected by fallout, and

C-bomb - Misplaced Pages Continue

3136-616: The Goiânia accident in Brazil in 1987 and the possibility of a " dirty bomb " with Co-60, which has similarities with the environment that one would be faced with after a nuclear yielding cobalt bomb's fallout had settled, has prompted the invention of "sequestration coatings" and cheap liquid phase sorbents for Co-60 that would further aid in decontamination , including that of water. Thermonuclear weapon A thermonuclear weapon , fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb ( H bomb )

3234-570: The Trident II SLBM, had a prolate primary (code-named Komodo ) and a spherical secondary (code-named Cursa ) inside a specially shaped radiation case (known as the "peanut" for its shape). The value of an egg-shaped primary lies apparently in the fact that a MIRV warhead is limited by the diameter of the primary: if an egg-shaped primary can be made to work properly, then the MIRV warhead can be made considerably smaller yet still deliver

3332-612: The W-80 the gas expansion velocity is roughly 410 km/s (41 cm/μs) and the implosion velocity 570 km/s (57 cm/μs). The pressure due to the ablating material is calculated to be 5.3  billion bars (530  trillion pascals ) in the Ivy Mike device and 64 billion bars (6.4 quadrillion pascals) in the W-80 device. Comparing the three mechanisms proposed, it can be seen that: The calculated ablation pressure

3430-547: The W47 warhead deployed on Polaris ballistic missile submarines , megaton-class warheads were as small as 18 inches (0.46 m) in diameter and 720 pounds (330 kg) in weight. Further innovation in miniaturizing warheads was accomplished by the mid-1970s, when versions of the Teller–Ulam design were created that could fit ten or more warheads on the end of a small MIRVed missile. The first Soviet fusion design, developed by Andrei Sakharov and Vitaly Ginzburg in 1949 (before

3528-416: The gamma dose in 2011 at the test site. The high percentage contribution is largely because the devices primarily used fusion rather than fission reactions, so the quantity of gamma-emitting caesium-137 fallout was comparatively low. A secondary forest now exists around the lake that was formed by the detonation. In 2015, a page from an apparent Russian nuclear torpedo design was leaked. The design

3626-558: The neutron flux from the primary to prematurely begin heating the secondary, weakening the compression enough to prevent any fusion. There is very little detailed information in the open literature about the mechanism of the interstage. One of the best sources is a simplified diagram of a British thermonuclear weapon similar to the American W80 warhead. It was released by Greenpeace in a report titled "Dual Use Nuclear Technology" . The major components and their arrangement are in

3724-408: The nuclear chain reaction that powers the conventional "atomic bomb". The secondary is usually shown as a column of fusion fuel and other components wrapped in many layers. Around the column is first a "pusher- tamper ", a heavy layer of uranium-238 ( U ) or lead that helps compress the fusion fuel (and, in the case of uranium, may eventually undergo fission itself). Inside this

3822-460: The secondary . The crucial detail of how the X-rays create the pressure is the main remaining disputed point in the unclassified press. There are three proposed theories: The radiation pressure exerted by the large quantity of X-ray photons inside the closed casing might be enough to compress the secondary. Electromagnetic radiation such as X-rays or light carries momentum and exerts a force on any surface it strikes. The pressure of radiation at

3920-589: The British fusion bomb, with Sir William Penney in charge of the project. British knowledge on how to make a thermonuclear fusion bomb was rudimentary, and at the time the United States was not exchanging any nuclear knowledge because of the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 . The United Kingdom had worked closely with the Americans on the Manhattan Project. British access to nuclear weapons information

4018-475: The Earth would not be universally rendered lifeless by a cobalt bomb. The fallout and devastation following a nuclear detonation does not scale upwards linearly with the explosive yield. As a result, the concept of "overkill"—the idea that one can simply estimate the destruction and fallout created by a thermonuclear weapon of the size postulated by Leo Szilard's "cobalt bomb" thought experiment by extrapolating from

C-bomb - Misplaced Pages Continue

4116-526: The Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, China and India. The thermonuclear Tsar Bomba was the most powerful bomb ever detonated. As thermonuclear weapons represent the most efficient design for weapon energy yield in weapons with yields above 50 kilotons of TNT (210 TJ), virtually all the nuclear weapons of this size deployed by the five nuclear-weapon states under the Non-Proliferation Treaty today are thermonuclear weapons using

4214-530: The Soviets had a working fission bomb), was dubbed the Sloika , after a Russian layer cake , and was not of the Teller–Ulam configuration. It used alternating layers of fissile material and lithium deuteride fusion fuel spiked with tritium (this was later dubbed Sakharov's "First Idea"). Though nuclear fusion might have been technically achievable, it did not have the scaling property of a "staged" weapon. Thus, such

4312-498: The Soviets searched for an alternative design. The "Second Idea", as Sakharov referred to it in his memoirs, was a previous proposal by Ginzburg in November 1948 to use lithium deuteride in the bomb, which would, in the course of being bombarded by neutrons, produce tritium and free deuterium. In late 1953 physicist Viktor Davidenko achieved the first breakthrough of staging the reactions. The next breakthrough of radiation implosion

4410-673: The Teller–Ulam configuration was tested at full scale in the "Ivy Mike" shot at an island in the Enewetak Atoll , with a yield of 10.4  Mt (44  PJ ) (over 450 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Nagasaki during World War II ). The device, dubbed the Sausage , used an extra-large fission bomb as a "trigger" and liquid deuterium—kept in its liquid state by 20 short tons (18  t ) of cryogenic equipment—as its fusion fuel, and weighed around 80 short tons (73  t ) altogether. The liquid deuterium fuel of Ivy Mike

4508-429: The Teller–Ulam design. Detailed knowledge of fission and fusion weapons is classified to some degree in virtually every industrialized country . In the United States, such knowledge can by default be classified as " Restricted Data ", even if it is created by persons who are not government employees or associated with weapons programs, in a legal doctrine known as " born secret " (though the constitutional standing of

4606-435: The U.S. and Soviets, achieving only approximately 300 kt (1,300 TJ). The second test Orange Herald was the modified fission bomb and produced 720 kt (3,000 TJ)—making it the largest fission explosion ever. At the time almost everyone (including the pilots of the plane that dropped it) thought that this was a fusion bomb. This bomb was put into service in 1958. A second prototype fusion bomb, Purple Granite ,

4704-493: The U.S. government has attempted to censor weapons information in the public press , with limited success. According to the New York Times , physicist Kenneth W. Ford defied government orders to remove classified information from his book Building the H Bomb: A Personal History . Ford claims he used only pre-existing information and even submitted a manuscript to the government, which wanted to remove entire sections of

4802-494: The X-ray energy impinging on its pusher/ tamper. This compresses the entire secondary stage and drives up the density of the plutonium spark plug. The density of the plutonium fuel rises to such an extent that the spark plug is driven into a supercritical state, and it begins a nuclear fission chain reaction . The fission products of this chain reaction heat the highly compressed (and thus super dense) thermonuclear fuel surrounding

4900-411: The amount of chemical explosives needed. The first Sloika design test, RDS-6s , was detonated in 1953 with a yield equivalent to 400 kt (1,700 TJ) ( 15%- 20% from fusion). Attempts to use a Sloika design to achieve megaton-range results proved unfeasible. After the United States tested the "Ivy Mike" thermonuclear device in November 1952, proving that a multimegaton bomb could be created,

4998-446: The book for concern that foreign states could use the information. Though large quantities of vague data have been officially released—and larger quantities of vague data have been unofficially leaked by former bomb designers—most public descriptions of nuclear weapon design details rely to some degree on speculation, reverse engineering from known information, or comparison with similar fields of physics ( inertial confinement fusion

SECTION 50

#1732780758243

5096-481: The casing to a plasma, which then re-radiated radiation into the secondary's pusher, causing its surface to ablate and driving it inwards, compressing the secondary, igniting the sparkplug, and causing the fusion reaction. The general applicability of this principle is unclear. In 1999 a reporter for the San Jose Mercury News reported that the U.S. W88 nuclear warhead, a small MIRVed warhead used on

5194-440: The casing's circumference. The neutron guns are tilted so the neutron emitting end of each gun end is pointed towards the central axis of the bomb. Neutrons from each neutron gun pass through and are focused by the neutron focus lens towards the centre of primary in order to boost the initial fissioning of the plutonium. A " polystyrene Polarizer/Plasma Source" is also shown (see below). The first U.S. government document to mention

5292-412: The conditions needed for fusion, and the idea of staging or placing a separate thermonuclear component outside a fission primary component, and somehow using the primary to compress the secondary. Teller then realized that the gamma and X-ray radiation produced in the primary could transfer enough energy into the secondary to create a successful implosion and fusion burn, if the whole assembly was wrapped in

5390-523: The danger of its accidentally becoming supercritical becomes too great. Surrounding the other components is a hohlraum or radiation case , a container that traps the first stage or primary's energy inside temporarily. The outside of this radiation case, which is also normally the outside casing of the bomb, is the only direct visual evidence publicly available of any thermonuclear bomb component's configuration. Numerous photographs of various thermonuclear bomb exteriors have been declassified. The primary

5488-416: The decision to go forward with the development of the new weapon. Teller and other U.S. physicists struggled to find a workable design. Stanislaw Ulam , a co-worker of Teller, made the first key conceptual leaps towards a workable fusion design. Ulam's two innovations that rendered the fusion bomb practical were that compression of the thermonuclear fuel before extreme heating was a practical path towards

5586-424: The diagram, though details are almost absent; what scattered details it does include likely have intentional omissions or inaccuracies. They are labeled "End-cap and Neutron Focus Lens" and "Reflector Wrap"; the former channels neutrons to the U / Pu Spark Plug while the latter refers to an X-ray reflector; typically a cylinder made of an X-ray opaque material such as uranium with

5684-479: The doctrine has been at times called into question; see United States v. Progressive, Inc. ). Born secret is rarely invoked for cases of private speculation. The official policy of the United States Department of Energy has been not to acknowledge the leaking of design information, as such acknowledgment would potentially validate the information as accurate. In a small number of prior cases,

5782-414: The effects of that absorbed energy led to the third mechanism: ablation . The outer casing of the secondary assembly is called the "tamper-pusher". The purpose of a tamper in an implosion bomb is to delay the expansion of the reacting fuel supply (which is very hot dense plasma) until the fuel is fully consumed and the explosion runs to completion. The same tamper material serves also as a pusher in that it

5880-415: The effects of thermonuclear weapons of smaller yields—is fallacious. For the type of radiation given by a cobalt bomb, the dosage measured in sievert (Sv) and gray (Gy) can be treated as equivalent. This is because the relevant harmful radiation from cobalt-60 is gamma rays. When converting between sievert and gray for gamma rays, the radiation type weighting factor will be 1, and the radiation will be

5978-512: The energy of the explosions into a "pancake" area is far more efficient in terms of area-destruction per unit of bomb energy. This also applies to single bombs deliverable by cruise missile or other system, such as a bomber, resulting in most operational warheads in the U.S. program having yields of less than 500 kt (2,100 TJ). In his 1995 book Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb , author Richard Rhodes describes in detail

SECTION 60

#1732780758243

6076-519: The far more powerful Super. The debate covered matters that were alternatively strategic, pragmatic, and moral. In their Report of the General Advisory Committee, Robert Oppenheimer and colleagues concluded that "[t]he extreme danger to mankind inherent in the proposal [to develop thermonuclear weapons] wholly outweighs any military advantage." Despite the objections raised, on 31 January 1950, President Harry S. Truman made

6174-536: The first few weeks following detonation. After one to six months, the fission products from even a large-yield thermonuclear weapon decay to levels tolerable by humans. The large-yield thermonuclear weapon is thus automatically a weapon of radiological warfare, but its fallout decays much more rapidly than that of a cobalt bomb. A cobalt bomb's fallout on the other hand would render affected areas effectively stuck in this interim state for decades: habitable but not safe for constant habitation. Initially, gamma radiation from

6272-471: The fission products of an equivalent size thermonuclear weapon are much more intense than Co-60: 15,000 times more intense at 1 hour; 35 times more intense at 1 week; 5 times more intense at 1 month; and about equal at 6 months. Thereafter fission product fallout radiation levels drop off rapidly, so that Co-60 fallout is 8 times more intense than fission at 1 year and 150 times more intense at 5 years. The very long-lived isotopes produced by fission would overtake

6370-436: The fissioning of the final natural uranium tamper, something that could not normally be achieved without the neutron flux provided by the fusion reactions in secondary or tertiary stages. Such designs are suggested to be capable of being scaled up to an arbitrary large yield (with apparently as many fusion stages as desired), potentially to the level of a " doomsday device ." However, usually such weapons were not more than

6468-504: The gap between the Neutron Focus Lens (in the center) and the outer casing near the primary. It separates the primary from the secondary and performs the same function as the previous reflector. There are about six neutron guns (seen here from Sandia National Laboratories ) each protruding through the outer edge of the reflector with one end in each section; all are clamped to the carriage and arranged more or less evenly around

6566-399: The ground. The deposited cobalt-60 would have a half-life of 5.27 years, decaying into Ni and emitting two gamma rays with energies of 1.17 and 1.33 MeV , hence the overall nuclear equation of the reaction is: 27 Co + n → 27 Co → 28 Ni + e + gamma rays. Nickel-60 is a stable isotope and undergoes no further decays after the transmutation

6664-462: The intensities seen in everyday life, such as sunlight striking a surface, is usually imperceptible, but at the extreme intensities found in a thermonuclear bomb the pressure is enormous. For two thermonuclear bombs for which the general size and primary characteristics are well understood, the Ivy Mike test bomb and the modern W-80 cruise missile warhead variant of the W-61 design, the radiation pressure

6762-420: The internal components of the "Ivy Mike" Sausage device, based on information obtained from extensive interviews with the scientists and engineers who assembled it. According to Rhodes, the actual mechanism for the compression of the secondary was a combination of the radiation pressure, foam plasma pressure, and tamper-pusher ablation theories; the radiation from the primary heated the polyethylene foam lining of

6860-504: The interstage was only recently released to the public promoting the 2004 initiation of the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) Program. A graphic includes blurbs describing the potential advantage of a RRW on a part-by-part level, with the interstage blurb saying a new design would replace "toxic, brittle material" and "expensive 'special' material... [that require] unique facilities". The "toxic, brittle material"

6958-581: The last year of the project he was assigned exclusively to the task. However once World War II ended, there was little impetus to devote many resources to the Super , as it was then known. The first atomic bomb test by the Soviet Union in August 1949 came earlier than expected by Americans, and over the next several months there was an intense debate within the U.S. government, military, and scientific communities regarding whether to proceed with development of

7056-415: The layer of fuel is the " spark plug ", a hollow column of fissile material ( Pu or U ) often boosted by deuterium gas. The spark plug, when compressed, can undergo nuclear fission (because of the shape, it is not a critical mass without compression). The tertiary, if one is present, would be set below the secondary and probably be made of the same materials. Separating

7154-432: The low direct plasma pressure they may be of use in delaying the ablation until energy has distributed evenly and a sufficient fraction has reached the secondary's tamper/pusher. Richard Rhodes ' book Dark Sun stated that a 1-inch-thick (25 mm) layer of plastic foam was fixed to the lead liner of the inside of the Ivy Mike steel casing using copper nails. Rhodes quotes several designers of that bomb explaining that

7252-424: The outer radiation case, with the components coming to a thermal equilibrium , and the effects of that thermal energy are then analyzed. The energy is mostly deposited within about one X-ray optical thickness of the tamper/pusher outer surface, and the temperature of that layer can then be calculated. The velocity at which the surface then expands outwards is calculated and, from a basic Newtonian momentum balance,

7350-438: The plastic foam layer inside the outer case is to delay ablation and thus recoil of the outer case: if the foam were not there, metal would ablate from the inside of the outer case with a large impulse, causing the casing to recoil outwards rapidly. The purpose of the casing is to contain the explosion for as long as possible, allowing as much X-ray ablation of the metallic surface of the secondary stage as possible, so it compresses

7448-413: The pressure produced by such a plasma would only be a small multiplier of the basic photon pressure within the radiation case, and also that the known foam materials intrinsically have a very low absorption efficiency of the gamma ray and X-ray radiation from the primary. Most of the energy produced would be absorbed by either the walls of the radiation case or the tamper around the secondary. Analyzing

7546-519: The primary and secondary assemblies placed within an enclosure called a radiation case, which confines the X-ray energy and resists its outward pressure. The distance separating the two assemblies ensures that debris fragments from the fission primary (which move much more slowly than X-ray photons ) cannot disassemble the secondary before the fusion explosion runs to completion. The secondary fusion stage—consisting of outer pusher/ tamper , fusion fuel filler and central plutonium spark plug—is imploded by

7644-442: The primary and secondary at either end. It does not reflect like a mirror; instead, it gets heated to a high temperature by the X-ray flux from the primary, then it emits more evenly spread X-rays that travel to the secondary, causing what is known as radiation implosion . In Ivy Mike , gold was used as a coating over the uranium to enhance the blackbody effect. Next comes the "Reflector/Neutron Gun Carriage". The reflector seals

7742-425: The primary would be used to compress and ignite the secondary fusion stage, resulting in a fusion explosion many times more powerful than the fission explosion alone. This chain of compression could conceivably be continued with an arbitrary number of tertiary fusion stages, each igniting more fusion fuel in the next stage although this is debated. Finally, efficient bombs (but not so-called neutron bombs ) end with

7840-448: The pure element or in modern weapons lithium deuteride . For this reason, thermonuclear weapons are often colloquially called hydrogen bombs or H-bombs . A fusion explosion begins with the detonation of the fission primary stage. Its temperature soars past 100 million kelvin , causing it to glow intensely with thermal ("soft") X-rays . These X-rays flood the void (the "radiation channel" often filled with polystyrene foam ) between

7938-418: The rest of the tamper-pusher to recoil inwards with tremendous force, crushing the fusion fuel and the spark plug. The tamper-pusher is built robustly enough to insulate the fusion fuel from the extreme heat outside; otherwise, the compression would be spoiled. Rough calculations for the basic ablation effect are relatively simple: the energy from the primary is distributed evenly onto all of the surfaces within

8036-450: The secondary efficiently, maximizing the fusion yield. Plastic foam has a low density, so causes a smaller impulse when it ablates than metal does. Possible variations to the weapon design have been proposed: Most bombs do not apparently have tertiary "stages"—that is, third compression stage(s), which are additional fusion stages compressed by a previous fusion stage. The fissioning of the last blanket of uranium, which provides about half

8134-422: The secondary from the primary is the interstage . The fissioning primary produces four types of energy: 1) expanding hot gases from high explosive charges that implode the primary; 2) superheated plasma that was originally the bomb's fissile material and its tamper; 3) the electromagnetic radiation ; and 4) the neutrons from the primary's nuclear detonation. The interstage is responsible for accurately modulating

8232-594: The secondary stages by radiation implosion. Because of these difficulties, in 1955 Prime Minister Anthony Eden agreed to a secret plan, whereby if the Aldermaston scientists failed or were greatly delayed in developing the fusion bomb, it would be replaced by an extremely large fission bomb. In 1957 the Operation Grapple tests were carried out. The first test, Green Granite, was a prototype fusion bomb that failed to produce equivalent yields compared to

8330-418: The spark plug to around 300 million kelvin, igniting fusion reactions between fusion fuel nuclei. In modern weapons fueled by lithium deuteride, the fissioning plutonium spark plug also emits free neutrons that collide with lithium nuclei and supply the tritium component of the thermonuclear fuel. The secondary's relatively massive tamper (which resists outward expansion as the explosion proceeds) also serves as

8428-407: The tamper and radiation case is the main contribution to the total yield and is the dominant process that produces radioactive fission product fallout . Before Ivy Mike, Operation Greenhouse in 1951 was the first American nuclear test series to test principles that led to the development of thermonuclear weapons. Sufficient fission was achieved to boost the associated fusion device, and enough

8526-457: The title C-bomb . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C-bomb&oldid=1126536836 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Cobalt bomb The concept of

8624-404: The transfer of energy from the primary to the secondary. It must direct the hot gases, plasma, electromagnetic radiation and neutrons toward the right place at the right time. Less than optimal interstage designs have resulted in the secondary failing to work entirely on multiple shots, known as a " fissile fizzle ". The Castle Koon shot of Operation Castle is a good example; a small flaw allowed

8722-412: The velocity at which the rest of the tamper implodes inwards. Applying the more detailed form of those calculations to the Ivy Mike device yields vaporized pusher gas expansion velocity of 290 kilometres per second (29 cm/μs) and an implosion velocity of perhaps 400 km/s (40 cm/μs) if + 3 ⁄ 4 of the total tamper/pusher mass is ablated off, the most energy efficient proportion. For

8820-404: The weapon (with the foam) would be as follows: This would complete the fission-fusion-fission sequence. Fusion, unlike fission, is relatively "clean"—it releases energy but no harmful radioactive products or large amounts of nuclear fallout . The fission reactions though, especially the last fission reactions, release a tremendous amount of fission products and fallout. If the last fission stage

8918-500: The yield in large bombs, does not count as a "stage" in this terminology. The U.S. tested three-stage bombs in several explosions during Operation Redwing but is thought to have fielded only one such tertiary model, i.e., a bomb in which a fission stage, followed by a fusion stage, finally compresses yet another fusion stage. This U.S. design was the heavy but highly efficient (i.e., nuclear weapon yield per unit bomb weight) 25 Mt (100 PJ) B41 nuclear bomb . The Soviet Union

9016-486: Was calculated to be 73 × 10 ^   bar (7.3  TPa ) for the Ivy Mike design and 1,400 × 10 ^   bar (140  TPa ) for the W-80. Foam plasma pressure is the concept that Chuck Hansen introduced during the Progressive case, based on research that located declassified documents listing special foams as liner components within the radiation case of thermonuclear weapons. The sequence of firing

9114-451: Was carried out by the United States in 1952, and the concept has since been employed by most of the world's nuclear powers in the design of their weapons. Modern fusion weapons essentially consist of two main components: a nuclear fission primary stage (fueled by U or Pu ) and a separate nuclear fusion secondary stage containing thermonuclear fuel: heavy isotopes of hydrogen ( deuterium and tritium ) as

9212-415: Was cut off by the United States at one point due to concerns about Soviet espionage. Full cooperation was not reestablished until an agreement governing the handling of secret information and other issues was signed. However, the British were allowed to observe the U.S. Castle tests and used sampling aircraft in the mushroom clouds , providing them with clear, direct evidence of the compression produced in

9310-604: Was discovered and developed by Sakharov and Yakov Zel'dovich in early 1954. Sakharov's "Third Idea", as the Teller–Ulam design was known in the USSR, was tested in the shot " RDS-37 " in November 1955 with a yield of 1.6 Mt (6.7 PJ). The Soviets demonstrated the power of the staging concept in October 1961, when they detonated the massive and unwieldy Tsar Bomba. It was the largest nuclear weapon developed and tested by any country. In 1954 work began at Aldermaston to develop

9408-509: Was impractical for a deployable weapon, and the next advance was to use a solid lithium deuteride fusion fuel instead. In 1954 this was tested in the " Castle Bravo " shot (the device was code-named Shrimp ), which had a yield of 15  Mt (63  PJ ) (2.5 times expected) and is the largest U.S. bomb ever tested. Efforts shifted towards developing miniaturized Teller–Ulam weapons that could fit into intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles . By 1960, with

9506-463: Was learned to achieve a full-scale device within a year. The design of all modern thermonuclear weapons in the United States is known as the Teller–Ulam configuration for its two chief contributors, Edward Teller and Stanisław Ulam , who developed it in 1951 for the United States, with certain concepts developed with the contribution of physicist John von Neumann . Similar devices were developed by

9604-412: Was titled " Oceanic Multipurpose System Status-6 ", later given the official name Poseidon . The document states the torpedo would create "wide areas of radioactive contamination, rendering them unusable for military, economic or other activity for a long time." Its payload would be "many tens of megatons in yield". Russian government newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta speculated that the warhead would be

#242757