71-490: Sound analysis: Real Time Snicko The Decision Review System ( DRS ), formerly known as the Umpire Decision Review System ( UDRS ), is a technology-based system used in cricket to assist the match officials in their decision-making. On-field umpires may choose to consult with the third umpire (known as an Umpire Review), and players may request that the third umpire consider a decision of
142-413: A "clear mistake" by the on-field umpire to reverse the decision. There are numerous parameters by which a leg before wicket (LBW) decision is adjudged to be a clear mistake, including: Umpire's Call is a way of saying that there is not a "clear mistake", and therefore the original on-field decision should stand. Furthermore, if the original decision stands as Umpire's Call, then the appealing team retains
213-452: A COVID-19-related rule change but has since become permanent). From 2013 until September 2017, the number of reviews available for a team in a Test innings was topped-up to two after 80 overs. From October 2017, if the on-field decision remains unchanged because the DRS shows "umpire's call", the team will not lose its review. As DRS become more commonplace in the game, there were perceptions that
284-430: A batter are (in descending order of frequency): caught , bowled , leg before wicket , run out , and stumped . Of these, the leg before wicket and stumped methods of dismissal can be seen as related to, or being special cases of, the bowled and run out methods of dismissal respectively. Most methods of dismissal do not apply on an illegal delivery (i.e. a wide or no-ball ) or on the free hit delivery that follows
355-405: A batter could be given out both Bowled and also for another reason, then the other reason is disregarded, and the batter is out Bowled. Between 1877 and 2012, this method accounted for 21.4% of all Test match dismissals. If the batter hits the ball, from a legitimate delivery (i.e. not a No-Ball), with the bat (or with the glove when the glove is in contact with the bat) and the ball is caught by
426-460: A call that is standing or revoking a call that is being reversed and then making the corrected signal. Only clearly incorrect decisions are reversed; if the Third Umpire's analysis is within established margins of error or is otherwise inconclusive, the on-field umpire's original call stands. In 2013, ICC tested a broadcaster-free replay system. Under the experiment, a non-match umpire sits in
497-410: A fielder or umpire. Dismissal (cricket) In cricket , a dismissal occurs when a batter 's innings is brought to an end by the opposing team. Other terms used are the batter being out , the batting side losing a wicket , and the fielding side taking a wicket . The ball becomes dead (meaning that no further runs can be scored off that delivery ), and the dismissed batter must leave
568-550: A hand that is not in contact with the bat) if this is performed in order to stop the ball from hitting the stumps. No batter has been out hitting the ball twice in Test cricket . There is only one occasion in International cricket where a batter has been out "Hitting the ball twice". Malta opening batter Fanyan Mughal in a Twenty20 International (T20I) match, on August 20, 2023, Romania v Malta at Ilfov County, București. If
639-415: A large total for the fielding side to follow in the next innings. Additionally, in Test and first-class cricket , it is usually necessary for the side fielding last to dismiss ten players of the opposing team in their final innings to achieve victory (unless one or more of the batters have retired hurt or absent and are unable to take the field). By convention, dismissal decisions are handled primarily by
710-551: A less sharp shape on the sound waveform , so it can be determined with some accuracy what contact made the sound. When the Decision Review System (DRS) was introduced to test cricket, initially Snicko was not considered accurate enough, and so another edge detecting tool Hot Spot was used. In 2013, an improved Snicko called the Real Time Snickometer, which was more reliable and faster to use,
781-406: A no-ball in certain competitions. Among the common methods of dismissal, only the "run out" dismissal can occur during any type of delivery. Once dismissed, a batter cannot score any more runs in that innings; thus, dismissing batters is a way for the fielding side to control the number of runs scored in an innings, and prevent the batting side from either achieving their target score or posting
SECTION 10
#1732780025058852-411: A separate room with a giant monitor and has discretion over which replays to see rather than relying on the broadcaster. The non-match umpire mirrors the role of the third umpire without having the duty of making adjudications. The system was first used in an Ashes Test (where Nigel Llong performed the duties of non-match umpire) and was repeated in a Pakistan-Sri Lanka ODI. After The Ashes in 2013,
923-523: A third umpire since November 1992, the formal DRS system to add Player Reviews was first used in a Test match in 2008, first used in a One Day International (ODI) in January 2011, and used in a Twenty20 International in October 2017. DRS was preceded by a system to allow on-field umpires to refer some decisions to the third umpire to be decided using TV replays , in place since November 1992. DRS which
994-414: Is Run out if at any time while the ball is in play, the wicket in the ground closest to them is fairly put down by the opposing side while no part of the batter's bat or body is grounded behind the popping crease . This usually happens while the batters are running between the wickets, attempting to score a run . Either the striker or non-striker can be Run out. The batter nearest the safe territory of
1065-429: Is a sound of leather on willow, which is usually a short, sharp sound producing a sharp waveform, in synchrony with the ball passing the bat, then the ball is deemed to have hit the bat. If the spike on the waveform comes too late or early, it is determined that the spike was not caused by the ball hitting the bat. Other sounds such as the ball hitting the batsman's pads, or the bat hitting the pitch, and so on, tend to have
1136-533: Is considered a dismissal. Only two players in Test history have ever been given out in this manner: Marvan Atapattu (for 201) and Mahela Jayawardene (for 150), both in the same innings playing for Sri Lanka against Bangladesh in September 2001. Apparently, this was done in order to give the other players batting practice, but was considered unsporting and drew criticism. In May 1983, Gordon Greenidge of
1207-567: Is made, especially they are assumed not out if there is no reaction by the umpire. During the 2012/2013 domestic season Cricket Australia trialed a review system in the domestic one day competition where the third umpire could intervene and review any out or not out decision. The review system was unpopular among players and critics, which the Australian International Twenty20 captain George Bailey calling
1278-405: Is not considered unsporting. In 1993 Graham Gooch , immediately after completing his hundredth first-class century with a six, retired on 105. A player who retires hurt and does not return to bat by the end of the innings is not considered out for statistical purposes , though, as substitutes are not permitted to bat, the impact on play is effectively the same as if they had retired out. If
1349-402: Is now covered by Obstructing the field . If the batter touched the ball with a hand not in contact with the bat for any purpose other than to prevent themselves being injured or, with the approval of the fielding team, to return the ball to a fielder, they were out on appeal. It was considered good etiquette for the fielding team not to appeal if the handling of the ball did not affect the play of
1420-513: Is reviewed by the TV umpire, their communication with the field umpire can be heard. In February 2013, the ICC agreed the use for all future ICC World Twenty20 tournaments, with one review per team. The first T20 tournament to use the technology was the 2018 ICC Women's World Twenty20 . It was used in the knockout stages of 2017 Indian Premier League , which was the first time DRS used in a T20 league. DRS
1491-427: The field of play for the rest of their team's innings, to be replaced by a team-mate. A team's innings ends if ten of the eleven team members are dismissed. Players bat in pairs so, when only one batter remains who can be not out , it is not possible for the team to bat any longer. This is known as dismissing or bowling out the batting team, who are said to be all out . The most common methods of dismissing
SECTION 20
#17327800250581562-444: The umpire 's judgement, the ball would have hit the wicket but for this interception, then the striker is out. There are also further criteria that must be met, including where the ball pitched, whether the ball hit the batter in line with the wickets, and whether the batter was attempting to hit the ball, and these have changed over time. Between 1877 and 2012, this method accounted for 14.3% of all Test match dismissals. A batter
1633-472: The DRS technology as well. West Indies legend Joel Garner labelled the system a "gimmick". Another West Indian Ramnaresh Sarwan said that he was not a supporter of the experimental referral system. Former umpire Dickie Bird also criticised the system, saying it undermines the authority of on-field umpires. The BCCI has expressed a skeptical view on the adoption of the system if it is near perfect. Pakistani spinner Saeed Ajmal expressed dissatisfaction over
1704-593: The Decision Review System after a semi-final of the 2011 Cricket World Cup against India. He said that DRS showed the line of the ball deviating more than it actually did. Hawk-Eye officials admitted in December 2014 that their review technology made an error in a decision to give Pakistan opener Shan Masood out in the second Test against New Zealand in Dubai (17-21 November 2014). At a meeting held at
1775-467: The ICC has started to take steps to give third umpire access to instant replays. This is regardless of calls being referred to by on-field umpires. By doing so, ICC wants to make sure that any obvious mistakes are avoided in future. The Decision Review System has generally received positive response from players and coaches since its launch. Because of its positive response, the ICC has attempted to apply uniform application of DRS in all cricket games around
1846-458: The ICC announced that for a trial period starting in October 2013, a team's referrals would be reset to two after 80 overs in an innings in Test matches. Previously each team had a maximum of two unsuccessful reviews per innings. Starting in November 2014 from Australia's ODI series versus South Africa, the field umpires' communications have also been broadcast to the viewers. Whenever a decision
1917-564: The ICC office in Dubai two weeks later, Hawk-Eye is understood to have conceded to Pakistan captain Misbah-ul-Haq and team manager Moin Khan that the projection used by their technology for the Leg before wicket decision was incorrect. Also, a challenge can only be made by the captain within a 15-second window from when an initial decision is made, but it can be lengthened if no clear decision
1988-517: The Third Umpire reviews the following: Umpire Reviews are also available to the on-field umpires when there is a Third umpire but the full UDRS is not in use. In this case, the Third umpire uses television replays (only) to come to a decision, and not the additional technology such as ball-tracking. A fielding team may use the system to dispute a "not out" decision and a batting team may use it to dispute an "out" decision. The fielding team captain or
2059-491: The West Indies retired out on 154 to visit his daughter, who was ill and who died two days later; he was subsequently judged to have retired not out, the only such decision in Test history. There are numerous other recorded instances of batters retiring out in first-class cricket , particularly in tour matches and warm-up matches; since these matches are generally treated as practice matches, retiring out in these matches
2130-510: The bails at their end without completing the run-up and dismiss the batter. This form of run-out is sometimes called the Mankad (the dismissed batter is said to have been "Mankaded"), in reference to Vinoo Mankad , the first bowler to dismiss a batter in this manner in a Test match, running out Bill Brown in 1947. With changes in the Laws of Cricket, a bowler cannot Mankad a batter once they reach
2201-449: The ball (assuming they are not attempting a run), whilst any fielder, including the keeper, may run out a batter who goes too far for any other purpose, including for taking a run. A special form of run out is when the batter at the non-striker 's end attempts to gain an advantage by leaving the crease before the next ball has been bowled (a common practice known as "backing up", but against the laws of cricket). The bowler may then dislodge
Decision Review System - Misplaced Pages Continue
2272-453: The ball twice, hit wicket, handled the ball/obstructing the field, and timed out. As it is possible to dismiss the non-striker, and possible to dismiss the striker from a wide (which does not count as a delivery for the batter), this means a batter can be dismissed without facing a single delivery. This is sometimes known as a diamond duck . Len Hutton , Desmond Haynes , and Steve Waugh were each dismissed in seven different ways over
2343-401: The ball, lost his balance and collapsed on to his stumps (and nearly into wicket-keeper Chris Read ). If the batter, by action or by words, obstructs or distracts the fielding side, then they are out. This law now encompasses transgressions that would previously have been covered by handled the ball , which has now been removed from the Laws. Only one player has ever been out obstructing
2414-451: The ball. As such, if a batter plays a straight drive which breaks the non-striker's stumps whilst they are outside their crease, they are not out. However, if a fielder (usually the bowler, in this case) touches the ball at all before it breaks the stumps at the non-striker's end, then it is a run out, even if the fielder never has any control of the ball. Between 1877 and 2012, this method accounted for 3.5% of all Test match dismissals. If
2485-406: The bat alongside a waveform displaying the soundwave of an oscilloscope connected to a sensitive microphone near the stumps . The newer version currently in use is called Real Time Snickometer ( RTS ) and does not need to be manually synchronized for every piece of footage, making the process much faster. It was initially used for the broadcast team to attempt to determine whether the ball hit
2556-450: The bat and therefore if the umpire gave the correct decision. It is now also used for DRS reviews when the third umpire needs to determine whether the ball hit the bat, such as for when a ball is caught behind and the batsman might have edged the ball, or in the case of leg before wicket , where the batsman is not out lbw if the ball has hit the bat (or glove) before it hit their body. It is used for this purpose in tandem with Hot Spot . It
2627-432: The batter "hits" the ball twice, they are out. The first hit is the ball striking the batter or their bat whilst the second hit is the batter intentionally making separate contact with the ball, not necessarily with the bat (it is therefore possible to be out hitting the ball twice whilst not actually hitting the ball with the bat either time). The batsman is allowed to hit the ball a second time with their bat or body (but not
2698-407: The batter being dismissed invokes the challenge by signalling a "T" with the arms or arm and bat. A challenge is only used in situations that did or could result in a dismissal: for example, to determine if the ball is a legal catch (making contact with the batter's bat or glove and not touching the ground before being held by a fielder), or if a delivery made the criteria for an LBW dismissal. Once
2769-467: The batter dislodges their own stumps with their body or bat, while in the process of taking a shot or beginning their first run, then they are out. This law does not apply if they avoided a ball thrown back to the wicket by a fielder, or broke the wicket in avoiding a run out. This law also applies if part of the batter's equipment is dislodged and hits the stumps: Dwayne Bravo hit Kevin Pietersen in
2840-476: The batter is out Stumped. Between 1877 and 2012, this method accounted for 2.0% of all Test match dismissals. If any batter leaves the field of play without the Umpire's consent for any reason other than injury or incapacity, they may resume the innings only with the consent of the opposing captain. If they fail to resume their innings, they are out. For the purposes of calculating a batting average , retired out
2911-455: The bowler or a fielder before it hits the ground, then the striker is out. "Caught behind" (an unofficial term) indicates that a player was caught by the wicket-keeper, or less commonly by the slips. "Caught and bowled" indicates the bowler also took the catch. Caught takes precedence over all other methods of dismissal except Bowled. What this means is, if a batter could be given out both Caught and also for another reason (except Bowled), then
Decision Review System - Misplaced Pages Continue
2982-455: The challenge is invoked, acknowledged, and agreed, the Third Umpire reviews the play. Each team can initiate referrals until they reach the limit of unsuccessful reviews. This limit is three unsuccessful review requests per innings during a Test match, and two unsuccessful review requests per innings during a One Day International or T20I (this limit was temporarily raised to three per innings for tests and two for one-day matches from July 2020 as
3053-493: The course of their test career. If a bowler's legitimate (i.e. not a No-ball ) delivery hits the wicket and puts it down , the striker (the batter facing the bowler) is out. The ball can either have struck the stumps directly, or have been deflected off the bat or body of the batter. However, the batter is not Bowled if the ball is touched by any other player or umpire before hitting the stumps. Bowled takes precedence over all other methods of dismissal. What this means is, if
3124-530: The field in a Test match: England's Len Hutton , playing against South Africa at the Oval in London in 1951, knocked a ball away from his stumps but in doing so prevented South African wicket-keeper Russell Endean from completing a catch. By coincidence, Endean was one of the few people to be given out handled the ball in a Test match. In One Day International cricket, eight batters have been given out obstructing
3195-429: The field. An incoming batter is "timed out" if they willfully take more than three minutes to be ready to face the next delivery (or be at the other end if not on strike). If a not out batter is not ready after a break in play, they can also be given out timed out on appeal. In the case of extremely long delays, the umpires may forfeit the match to either team. So far, this method of taking a wicket has never happened in
3266-645: The first Test between New Zealand and Pakistan at the University Oval in Dunedin . It was first used in One Day Internationals (ODI) in January 2011 during England's tour of Australia . The ICC initially made the UDRS mandatory in all international matches, but later made its use optional, so that the system would only be used if both teams agree. The ICC has agreed to continue to work on
3337-515: The game was becoming too forensic and technical in decision-making and that there was a risk on-field umpires would become nothing more than "glorified coat stands". To better finesse the system 'Umpire's Call' was introduced in 2016 by the International Cricket Council. Umpire's Call is a way of saying the original decision made by the on-field umpire should stand. The rules of the referral system say that there needs to be
3408-538: The head with a bouncer and his helmet hit the stumps during the 2007 England vs West Indies Test match at Old Trafford; a topspinner from Richie Benaud once knocked off Joe Solomon 's cap, and the cap landed on Solomon's stumps. Being out hit-wicket is often seen as a comic method of dismissal. In 1991 Jonathan Agnew and Brian Johnston , commentators on BBC Radio 's Test Match Special , got themselves into difficulty while commentating on Ian Botham 's dismissal (Botham dislodged his leg bail whilst trying to step over
3479-412: The history of Test cricket and there have only been six occasions in all forms of first-class cricket. Angelo Mathews of Sri Lanka became the first batsman to be dismissed in this fashion in an international fixture, in a group stage match against Bangladesh in the 2023 Cricket World Cup . Before the amendments of the Laws in 2017, there was a separate dismissal type of Handled the ball which
3550-428: The on-field umpires (known as a Player Review). The main elements that have been used are television replays, technology that tracks the path of the ball and predicts what it would have done, microphones to detect small sounds made as the ball hits bat or pad, and infra-red imaging to detect temperature changes as the ball hits the bat or pad. While on-field Test match umpires have been able to refer some decisions to
3621-403: The other reason is disregarded, and the batter is out Caught. Between 1877 and 2012, this method accounted for 56.9% of all Test match dismissals, with 40.6% caught by fielders, and 16.3% caught by the wicket-keeper. If a bowler's legitimate (i.e., not a No-ball) delivery strikes any part of the batter (not necessarily the leg), without first touching the bat (or glove holding the bat), and, in
SECTION 50
#17327800250583692-476: The players; thus, if the dismissal is obvious the batter will voluntarily leave the field without the umpire needing to dismiss them. If the batter and fielding side disagree about a dismissal then the fielding side must appeal to the umpire, who will then decide whether the batter is out. In competitive cricket, many difficult catching and LBW decisions will be left to the umpire; if a batter acknowledges that they are out in such cases and departs without waiting for
3763-453: The point in their delivery where they would normally release the ball. It is considered good etiquette to warn a batter that he is leaving their crease early, before attempting a Mankad run out on a subsequent ball. In 2022, the ICC moved this form of dismissal from the 'Unfair Play' section of the Laws of the Game to the normal 'Run Out' section. A run out cannot occur if no fielder has touched
3834-486: The requirement to appoint neutral match officials was temporarily suspended due to the logistical challenges with international travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Following from this change, the number of unsuccessful reviews per test innings was raised from 2 to 3 keeping in mind that there may be less experienced umpires on duty at times. From 1 June 2023, the "soft-signal" requirement for umpires when referring catches
3905-553: The review. The implementation of Umpire's Call has been noted in other sports whereby similar issues have arisen in the case of highly-marginal decisions (i.e. not a "clear mistake) which are perceived to be unfairly decided by forensic and technical means. On April 4, 2021, in the International Cricket Council committee meeting led by Anil Kumble , the height margin of the Wicket Zone was lifted to
3976-441: The striker steps in front of the crease to play the ball, leaving no part of their body or the bat on the ground behind the crease, and the wicket-keeper is able to put down the wicket with the ball, then the striker is out. A stumping is most likely to be effected off slow bowling, or (less frequently) medium-paced bowling when the wicket-keeper is standing directly behind the stumps. As wicket-keepers stand several yards back from
4047-401: The stumps to fast bowlers, stumpings are hardly ever effected off fast bowlers. The ball can bounce off a keeper (but not external non-usual wicketkeeping protective equipment, like a helmet) and break the stumps and still be considered a stumping. Stumped takes precedence over Run out. What this means is, if a batter could be given out both Stumped and Run out, then Run out is disregarded, and
4118-533: The stumps, having lost his balance in missing a hook shot against Curtly Ambrose ), Agnew commenting that he "couldn't quite get his leg over". A more recent example of a comic hit-wicket dismissal was during the Headingley Test match in the 2006 test series between England and Pakistan , when Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul-Haq missed a sweep against Monty Panesar , was hit in the midriff by
4189-401: The stumps. An analysis of more than 2,100 Player Reviews between September 2009 and March 2017 found that: Snickometer Snickometer , commonly known as Snicko , is a system used in cricket to determine whether the ball edged the bat, for a potential dismissal such as a catch or leg before wicket . It does this by showing a frame-by-frame replay of the footage of the ball passing
4260-463: The system "shocking and embarrassing". The review system was dropped by Cricket Australia after only two rounds of the competition. During an ODI between Australia and South Africa in June 2016, Hawk-Eye 's accuracy came under criticism after AB de Villiers was dismissed clean bowled by Josh Hazlewood but subsequent Hawk-Eye trajectory prediction of the same delivery showed that the ball would go over
4331-469: The technology and will try to incorporate its use into all ICC events. In October 2012, the ICC made amendments on lbw protocols, increasing the margin of uncertainty when the ball hits the batsman's pad. In July 2016, the rules were amended once again, reducing the margin of uncertainty. The updated rules were first used in the ODI match between Ireland and South Africa in September 2016. In September 2013,
SECTION 60
#17327800250584402-409: The top of the stumps to ensure the same Umpire's Call margin around the stumps for both height and width. The third umpire then looks at various TV replays from different angles, comes to a conclusion, and then reports to the on-field umpire whether their analysis supports the original call, contradicts the call, or is inconclusive. The on-field umpire then makes the final decision: either re-signalling
4473-405: The umpire's decision it is known as "walking", and regarded as an honourable but controversial act. If the umpire believes they have incorrectly dismissed a batter, they may recall them to the crease if they have not already left the field of play. An example of this was in the 2007 Lord's test match between England and India when Kevin Pietersen was initially given out caught behind, but
4544-408: The wicket that has been put down, but not actually in safe territory, is out. On the line is considered as out; frequently it is a close call whether or not a batter gained their ground before the bails were removed, with the decision referred to the Decision Review System . The difference between stumped and run out is that the wicket-keeper may stump a batter who goes too far forward to play
4615-454: The world, but this has been difficult for some countries to implement. Some countries, especially the poorer ones, are unable to afford the technology and choose to use parts of it or not use it at all. The technology is often used by broadcasters to bring an even more vivid analysis of specific plays and games. It was designed to eradicate the errors of umpires, and it has done so in many games. However, there have been some negative responses to
4686-399: Was adopted by the game of cricket has also seen several other sports such as the high-profile International Soccer, Tennis, etc. incorporating this idea of Player Referral and goal-line technology into the game. The Player Referral system was first tested in an India v. Sri Lanka match in 2008, and was officially launched by the International Cricket Council (ICC) on 24 November 2009, during
4757-601: Was invented by English computer scientist Allan Plaskett in the mid-1990s. The snickometer was introduced by Channel 4 in the UK, who also introduced the Hawk-Eye and the Red Zone, in 1999. The Snickometer is used in a slow motion television replay by the third umpire or broadcasters to determine if the cricket ball touched the cricket bat . The soundwave appears next to the slow motion, frame by frame replay. If there
4828-440: Was recalled when television replays showed that the ball had bounced before being taken by Mahendra Singh Dhoni . A batter can be dismissed in a number of ways, the most common being bowled, caught, leg before wicket (LBW), run out and stumped. An analysis of Test match dismissals between 1877 and 2012 found that 98.2% of the 63,584 Test match dismissals in this period were one of these five types. Much rarer were retired, hit
4899-440: Was scrapped as they were "unnecessary and at times confusing". The components of DRS are: In many cases, the event occurs in a fraction of a second. At their discretion, on-field umpires may request the Third Umpire reviews the following dismissal decisions: Note the on-field umpires may not request the Third Umpire review an LBW decision (apart from whether the delivery was a no-ball). The on-field umpires may also request
4970-408: Was used for first time for DRS in the 2013-14 Ashes series . The system relies on users to tell the difference between a contact between bat and ball, and other contact which has a more flat waveform such as bat on pad or ball on pad. It is easier to tell where the ball contacted precisely with Hot Spot , but that system has the disadvantage of needing a clear angle, which is sometimes obstructed by
5041-455: Was used for the first time in a Twenty20 International in the 2014 ICC World Twenty20 . Under the new ICC rules of November 2017, there would no longer be a top-up of reviews after 80 overs in Test matches, and teams will have only 2 unsuccessful reviews every innings. However, teams would no longer lose a review for an "umpire's call" (a ruling in which the on field's umpire's ruling stands due to inconclusive data) on an LBW review. In 2020,
#57942