The European Law Moot Court ( ELMC ) is an annual moot court competition between rival teams of university students who have an interest in European Union law .
74-425: The competition consists of a written round, regional finals, and a Europe-wide final. During the written round the teams of three or four students write two legal pleadings (one each for the applicant and respondent). From these written pleadings the teams are scored and the 48 highest scoring teams proceed to one of the four regional finals across the globe for oral hearings. One team from each regional final goes on to
148-689: A preliminary ruling and appeals against decisions of the General Court . Under Article 258 (ex Article 226) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , the Court of Justice may determine whether a Member State has fulfilled its obligations under Union law. That action may be brought by the commission – as is practically always the case – or by another Member State, although
222-654: A Dutch transport firm brought a complaint against Dutch customs for increasing the duty on a product imported from Germany. The court ruled that the Community constitutes a new legal order, the subjects of which consist of not only the Member States but also their nationals. Consequently Community law may, if appropriately framed, confer rights on individuals which national courts are bound to protect. The principle of direct effect would have had little impact if Union law did not supersede national law. Without supremacy
296-413: A Union institution, that is a party to certain proceedings, so requests, or in particularly complex or important cases. The court acts as a collegial body: decisions are those of the court rather than of individual judges; no minority opinions are given and indeed the existence of a majority decision rather than unanimity is never suggested. It is the responsibility of the Court of Justice to ensure that
370-721: A briefing paper from the House of Commons Library assessed the implications of leaving Euratom. In 2017, an article in The Independent questioned the availability of nuclear fuel to the UK after 2019 if the UK were to withdraw, and the need for new treaties relating to the transportation of nuclear materials. A 2017 article in the New Scientist stated that radioisotope supply for cancer treatments would also need to be considered in new treaties. UK politicians speculated that
444-595: A dictum which summarises the decision which the Court has made and may direct how costs are to be managed. In the ECJ's 2009 report it was noted that Belgian, German and Italian judges made the most referrals for an interpretation of EU law to the ECJ. However, the German Constitutional Court has rarely turned to the European Court of Justice, which is why lawyers and law professors warn about
518-576: A full member of the organisation on 31 January 2020. However, under the terms of the UK–EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement , the United Kingdom participates in Euratom as an associated state following the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020. The driving force behind the creation of Euratom was France's desire to develop nuclear energy and nuclear weapons without having to rely on
592-405: A future judicial conflict between the two courts. On 7 February 2014, the German Constitutional Court referred its first case to the ECJ for a ruling on a European Central Bank program. In 2017 the German Constitutional Court referred its second case to the ECJ but contrary to the binding nature of the Court of Justice's preliminary rulings, the German Constitutional Court in 2020 refused to abide by
666-498: A legal solution to the case before the judges deliberate and deliver their judgment. The intention behind having Advocates General attached is to provide independent and impartial opinions concerning the Court's cases. Unlike the Court's judgments, the written opinions of the Advocates General are the works of a single author and are consequently generally more readable and deal with the legal issues more comprehensively than
740-414: A member state or a national of a member state the applicant must choose an official language of that member state, unless the parties agree otherwise. However, the working language of the court is the language of the case being heard with French being the common language for discussion, and it is in this language that the judges deliberate, pleadings and written legal submissions are translated and in which
814-563: A particular outcome if that was the opinion of the Advocate General. As of 2003, Advocates General are only required to give an opinion if the Court considers the case raises a new point of law. According to Article 255 TFEU the judges and advocates-general are appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States after consultation of a panel responsible for assessing candidates’ suitability. The Registrar
SECTION 10
#1732782466155888-584: A problem of the same nature is raised. Although such a reference may be made only by a national court, which alone has the power to decide that it is appropriate do so, all the parties involved – that is to say, the Member States, the parties in the proceedings before national courts and, in particular, the commission – may take part in proceedings before the Court of Justice. In this way, a number of important principles of Union law have been laid down in preliminary rulings, sometimes in answer to questions referred by national courts of first instance. Rulings end with
962-399: A question to the European Court of Justice. These are the first references by each constitutional court: Procedure before the ECJ is determined by its own rules of procedure. As a rule the Court's procedure includes a written phase and an oral phase. The proceedings are conducted in one of the official languages of the European Union chosen by the applicant, although where the defendant is
1036-616: A register initialled by the President. They are Guardian of the Seals and responsible for the Court's archives and publications. The Registrar is responsible for the administration of the Court, its financial management and its accounts. The operation of the Court is in the hands of officials and other servants who are responsible to the Registrar under the authority of the President. The Court administers its own infrastructure; this includes
1110-527: A separate community to cover nuclear power . Louis Armand was put in charge of a study into the prospects of nuclear energy use in Europe; his report concluded that further nuclear development was needed to fill the deficit left by the exhaustion of coal deposits and to reduce dependence on oil producers. However, the Benelux states and Germany were also keen on creating a general single market , although it
1184-419: A specialist market for nuclear power in Europe, by developing nuclear energy and distributing it to its member states while selling the surplus to non-member states. However, over the years its scope has been considerably increased to cover a large variety of areas associated with nuclear power and ionising radiation as diverse as safeguarding of nuclear materials , radiation protection and construction of
1258-463: A threat of a "government by judges". He claimed that foreign judges were not always aware of the financial implications of their judgements on national governments. European Atomic Energy Community The European Atomic Energy Community ( EAEC or Euratom ) is an international organisation established by the Euratom Treaty on 25 March 1957 with the original purpose of creating
1332-649: A tie. One judge was appointed from each member state and the seventh seat rotated between the "large Member States" (West Germany, France and Italy). It became an institution of two additional Communities in 1957 when the European Economic Community (EEC), and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) were created, sharing the same courts with the European Coal and Steel Community. The Maastricht Treaty
1406-494: A way to limit the value of Euratom and gain influence over the spread of nuclear technology. The Soviet Union launched a propaganda campaign against Euratom, as it sought to stoke fears among Europeans that the organization would enable West Germany to develop nuclear weapons. The Common Assembly proposed extending the powers of the ECSC to cover other sources of energy. However, Jean Monnet , ECSC architect and President, wanted
1480-465: Is based in Luxembourg . It is composed of one judge per member state – currently 27 – although it normally hears cases in panels of three, five or fifteen judges. The Court has been led by president Koen Lenaerts since 2015. The ECJ is the highest court of the European Union in matters of Union law , but not national law. It is not possible to appeal against the decisions of national courts in
1554-412: Is elected for a term of three years in the case of the five-judge chambers or one year in the case of three-judge chambers. The Court is required to sit in full court in exceptional cases provided for in the treaties. The court may also decide to sit in full, if the issues raised are considered to be of exceptional importance. Sitting as a Grand Chamber is more common and can happen when a Member State or
SECTION 20
#17327824661551628-573: Is the Court's chief administrator. They manage departments under the authority of the Court's president. The Court may also appoint one or more Assistant Registrars. They help the Court, the Chambers, the President and the Judges in all their official functions. They are responsible for the Registry as well as for the receipt, transmission and custody of documents and pleadings that have been entered in
1702-549: Is the doctrines of direct effect and supremacy that allow the European legal system to forgo any use of retaliatory enforcement mechanisms by the Member States. Links between the direct effect doctrine and the suppression of inter-state retaliation between the EU member states can be found in many of the landmark early decisions of the European Court of Justice, and in the writings of the influential French judge, Robert Lecourt , perhaps
1776-474: Is the only former EC body that has not been incorporated into the EU. Since the end of World War II , sovereign European countries have entered into treaties and thereby co-operated and harmonised policies (or pooled sovereignty ) in an increasing number of areas, in the European integration project or the construction of Europe ( French : la construction européenne ). The following timeline outlines
1850-592: The Court of Justice ( French : Cour de Justice ), is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law . As a part of the Court of Justice of the European Union , it is tasked with interpreting EU law and ensuring its uniform application across all EU member states under Article 263 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Court was established in 1952, and
1924-666: The European Council at Edinburgh in 1992. However, there was no reference to future bodies being in Luxembourg City. In reaction to this, the Luxembourg government issued its own declaration stating it did not surrender those provisions agreed upon in 1965. The Edinburgh decision was attached to the Amsterdam Treaty . With the Treaty of Nice Luxembourg attached a declaration stating it did not claim
1998-714: The Maastricht Treaty created the European Union, which absorbed the Communities into the European Community pillar, yet Euratom still maintained a distinct legal personality. The European Constitution was intended to consolidate all previous treaties and increase democratic accountability in them. The Euratom treaty had not been amended as the other treaties had, so the European Parliament had been granted few powers over it. However,
2072-414: The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union . A reference for a preliminary ruling may also seek review of the legality of an act of Union law. The Court of Justice's reply is not merely an opinion, but takes the form of a judgment or a reasoned order. The national court to which that is addressed is bound by the interpretation given. The Court's judgment also binds other national courts before which
2146-639: The Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment, it may, upon the request of the commission, impose on the Member State a fixed or a periodic financial penalty under Article 260 of the TFEU. By an action for annulment under Article 263 (ex Article 230) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , the applicant seeks the annulment of a measure (regulation, directive, decision or any measure with legal effects) adopted by an institution, body, office or agency of
2220-674: The Court of Justice or the General Court is that which appears in the language of the case. All the EU's judicial bodies are based in the Kirchberg quarter of Luxembourg City , Luxembourg . The Court of Justice is seated in the Palais de la Cour de Justice . Luxembourg City was chosen as the provisional seat of the Court on 23 July 1952 with the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community . Its first hearing there
2294-412: The Court, which is limited to the particular matters at hand. The opinions of the Advocates General are advisory and do not bind the Court, but they are nonetheless very influential and are followed in the majority of cases. In a 2016 study, Arrebola and Mauricio measured the influence of the Advocate General on the judgments of the Court, showing that the Court is approximately 67% more likely to deliver
European Law Moot Court - Misplaced Pages Continue
2368-468: The ECJ, but rather national courts refer questions of EU law to the ECJ. However, it is ultimately for the national court to apply the resulting interpretation to the facts of any given case, although only courts of final appeal are bound to refer a question of EU law when one is addressed. The treaties give the ECJ the power for consistent application of EU law across the EU as a whole. The court also acts as an administrative and constitutional court between
2442-532: The EU. The Court of Justice has exclusive jurisdiction over actions brought by a Member State against the European Parliament and/or against the council (apart from Council measures in respect of State aid, dumping and implementing powers) or brought by one Union institution against another. The General Court has jurisdiction, at first instance, in all other actions of this type and particularly in actions brought by individuals. The Court of Justice has
2516-629: The European Union . Formal notice to withdraw from the EAEC was provided in March 2017, within the Article 50 notification letter, where the withdrawal was made explicit. Withdrawal only became effective following negotiations on the terms of the exit, which lasted two years and ten months. A report by the House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee , published in May 2017, questioned
2590-472: The European Union from 1 January 2021, makes provision for the United Kingdom's participation "as an associated country of all parts of the Euratom programme". In the history of European regulation, Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty represents pioneering legislation concerning binding transfrontier obligations with respect to environmental impact and protection of humans. The five-member Commission
2664-609: The International Fusion Reactor ITER . It is legally distinct from the European Union (EU) although it has the same membership , and is governed by many of the EU's institutions ; but it is the only remaining community organisation that is independent of the EU and therefore outside the regulatory control of the European Parliament. Since 2014, Switzerland has also participated in Euratom programmes as an associated state. The United Kingdom ceased to be
2738-401: The Member States could simply ignore EU rules. In Costa v ENEL (1964), the court ruled that member states had definitively transferred sovereign rights to the Community and Union law could not be overridden by domestic law. Another early landmark case was Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium (1964), the "Dairy Products" case. In that decision the Court comprehensively ruled out any use by
2812-507: The Member States of the retaliatory measures commonly permitted by general international law within the European Economic Community. That decision is often thought to be the best example of the European legal order's divergence with ordinary international law. Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium also has a logical connection with the nearly contemporaneous Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL decisions, as arguably it
2886-542: The President of the Court of Justice, the Vice-President is elected by the members of the Court for a term of three years. The judges are assisted by eleven Advocates General , whose number may be increased by the Council if the Court so requests. The Advocates General are responsible for presenting a legal opinion on the cases assigned to them. They can question the parties involved and then give their opinion on
2960-456: The Statute of the Court of Justice in 2012. The duty of the Vice-President is to assist the President in the performance of his duties and to take the President's place when the latter is prevented from attending or when the office of President is vacant. In 2012, judge Koen Lenaerts from Belgium became the first judge to carry out the duties of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice. Like
3034-477: The Translation Directorate, which, as of 2012 employed 44.7% of the staff of the institution. The Court can sit in plenary session, as a Grand Chamber of fifteen judges (including the president and vice-president), or in chambers of three or five judges. Plenary sittings are now very rare, and the court mostly sits in chambers of three or five judges. Each chamber elects its own president who
European Law Moot Court - Misplaced Pages Continue
3108-451: The UK could stay in Euratom. In 2017, some argued that this would require – beyond the consent of the EU27 – amendment or revocation of the Article 50 letter of March 2017. The Nuclear Safeguards Act 2018 , making provision for safeguards after withdrawal from Euratom, received royal assent on 26 June 2018. The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement , outlining the UK's relationship with
3182-480: The Union for damage to citizens and to undertakings caused by its institutions or servants in the performance of their duties. Under Article 256 (ex Article 225) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , appeals on judgments given by the General Court may be heard by the Court of Justice only if the appeal is on a point of law. If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside
3256-575: The United States and/or the United Kingdom. The costs of nuclear development were also large, motivating France to share the costs with the other members of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). During the negotiations to create Euratom, the United States and the United Kingdom sought to gain influence over nuclear development in Europe. The US and the UK created the European Nuclear Energy Agency (ENEA) as
3330-472: The administrative implementation of Union law, for which the authorities of the Member States are essentially responsible; many provisions of the Treaties and of secondary legislation – regulations, directives and decisions – directly confer individual rights on nationals of Member States, which national courts must uphold. National courts are thus by their nature the first guarantors of Union law . To ensure
3404-549: The all-European final where the four regional final winning teams argue before the judges of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg . In addition, one member from each team at the regional finals can participate in the competition as the representative of the European Commission or Advocate-General of the European Court of Justice and is eligible to receive a separate award for his or her effort at
3478-402: The all-European finals. There is also a special award for the best oral speaker and the best written pleadings. The motto of the competition is "moot, meet and compete". In the 2004/2005 competition, the regional finals were held in: In the 2005/2006 competition, the regional finals were held in: In the 2006/2007 competition, the regional finals were held in: In the 2007/2008 competition,
3552-484: The cases of the latter kind remain extremely rare. Only six interstate cases have been decided by the court: The commencement of proceedings before the Court of Justice is preceded by a preliminary procedure conducted by the commission, which gives the Member State the opportunity to reply to the complaints against it. The court has decided that if the European Commission does not send the formal letter to
3626-451: The effective and uniform application of Union legislation and to prevent divergent interpretations, national courts may, and sometimes must, turn to the Court of Justice and ask that it clarify a point concerning the interpretation of Union law, in order, for example, to ascertain whether their national legislation complies with that law. Petitions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling are described in Article 267 (ex Article 234) of
3700-560: The entrance into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the ECJ's official name was changed from the "Court of Justice of the European Communities" to the "Court of Justice" although in English it is still most common to refer to the Court as the European Court of Justice. The Court of First Instance was renamed as the "General Court", and the term "Court of Justice of the European Union" now officially designates
3774-472: The independent Boards of Appeal of the EU agencies (as provided by Article 58a of the Statute of the Court). References for a preliminary ruling are specific to Union law. Whilst the Court of Justice is, by its very nature, the supreme guardian of Union legality, it is not the only judicial body empowered to apply EU law. That task also falls to national courts, in as much as they retain jurisdiction to review
SECTION 50
#17327824661553848-414: The institution has been called on to act. Where the failure to act is held to be unlawful, it is for the institution concerned to put an end to the failure by appropriate measures. Under Article 268 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (and with reference to Article 340), the Court of Justice hears claims for compensation based on non-contractual liability , and rules on the liability of
3922-413: The judgment is drafted. The Advocates-General, by contrast, may work and draft their opinions in any official language, as they do not take part in any deliberations. These opinions are then translated into French for the benefit of the judges and their deliberations. However, all documents used in the case are in the language of that case and the only authentic version of the judgment handed down by either
3996-401: The judgment of the General Court. Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court may itself decide the case. Otherwise, the Court must refer the case back to the General Court, which is bound by the decision given on appeal. No special procedure applies to allow for an appeal to proceed to the Court of Justice, except for cases which the General Court ruled on appeal against decisions of
4070-514: The law is observed in the interpretation and application of the Treaties of the European Union . To enable it to carry out its duties, the Court has broad jurisdiction to hear various types of action. The Court has competence to, amongst other actions, rule on applications for annulment or actions for failure to act brought by a Member State or an institution; take actions against Member States for failure to fulfil obligations; and hear references for
4144-558: The legal inception of the European Union (EU)—the principal framework for this unification. The EU inherited many of its present responsibilities from the European Communities (EC), which were founded in the 1950s in the spirit of the Schuman Declaration . The United Kingdom announced its intention to withdraw from the EAEC on 26 January 2017, following on from its decision to withdraw from
4218-406: The legal necessity of leaving Euratom and called for a temporary extension of membership to allow time for new arrangements to be made. In June 2017, the European Commission's negotiations task force published a Position paper transmitted to EU27 on nuclear materials and safeguard equipment (Euratom) , titled "Essential Principles on nuclear materials and safeguard equipment". The following month,
4292-424: The most important member of the Court between 1962 and 1976. Further, in the 1991 case Francovich v Italy , the ECJ established that Member States could be liable to pay compensation to individuals who suffered a loss by reason of the Member State's failure to transpose an EU directive into national law. In 2008, the former German president Roman Herzog claimed that the ECJ was overstepping its powers. He
4366-638: The nuclear field, at the time a very popular area, and would, along with the EEC, share the Common Assembly and Court of Justice of the ECSC, but not its executives. Euratom would have its own Council and Commission, with fewer powers than the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community . On 25 March 1957, the Treaties of Rome (the Euratom Treaty and the EEC Treaty ) were signed by
4440-407: The other EU institutions and the Member States and can annul or invalidate unlawful acts of EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. The court was established in 1952, by the Treaty of Paris (1951) as part of the European Coal and Steel Community . It was established with seven judges, allowing both representation of each of the six member States and being an odd number of judges in case of
4514-424: The power to declare measures void under Article 264 (ex Article 231) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union . Under Article 265 (ex Article 232) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , the Court of Justice and the General Court may also review the legality of a failure to act on the part of a Union institution, body, office or agency. However, such an action may be brought only after
SECTION 60
#17327824661554588-415: The preliminary ruling. According to the German Constitutional Court, the Court of Justice's answer was unintelligble. In June 2021, the European Commission announced it would start infringement proceedings against Germany for the German Constitutional Court's refusal to abide by the Court of Justice's preliminary ruling. The constitutional courts of the member-states have in general been reluctant to refer
4662-488: The qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial offices in their respective countries or who are of recognised competence. In practice, each member state nominates a judge whose nomination is then ratified by all other member states. The President of the Court of Justice is elected from and by the judges for a renewable term of three years. The President presides over hearings and deliberations, directing both judicial business and administration (for example,
4736-540: The reason it had gone unamended was the same reason the Constitution left it to remain separate from the rest of the EU: anti-nuclear sentiment among the European electorate, which may unnecessarily turn voters against the treaty. The Euratom treaty thus remains in force relatively unamended from its original signing. This overall timeline includes the establishment and development of Euratom, and shows that currently, it
4810-489: The regional finals were held in: In the 2010/2011 competition, the regional finals were held in: In the 2011/2012 competition, the regional finals are held in: This Europe-related article is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . This article relating to the law of Europe or of a European country is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . European Court of Justice The European Court of Justice ( ECJ ), formally just
4884-647: The seat of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market – even if it were to become a judicial body. Over time ECJ developed two essential rules on which the legal order rests: direct effect and primacy . The court first ruled on the direct effect of primary legislation in a case that, though technical and tedious, raised a fundamental principle of Union law. In Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen (1963),
4958-535: The six ECSC members and on 1 January 1958 they came into force. To save on resources, these separate executives created by the Rome Treaties were merged in 1965 by the Merger Treaty . The institutions of the EEC would take over responsibilities for the running of the ECSC and Euratom, with all three then becoming known as the European Communities even if each legally existed separately. In 1993,
5032-415: The time table of the Court and Grand Chamber). He also assigns cases to the chambers for examination and appoints judge as rapporteurs called Judge-Rapporteur (reporting judges). The Council may also appoint assistant rapporteurs to assist the President in applications for interim measures and to assist rapporteurs in the performance of their duties. The post of Vice-President was created by amendments to
5106-432: The two courts, as along with its specialised tribunals, taken together. The Court of Justice consists of 27 Judges who are assisted by 11 Advocates-General . The Judges and Advocates-General are appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states and hold office for a renewable term of six years. The treaties require that they are chosen from legal experts whose independence is "beyond doubt" and who possess
5180-406: The violating member state no-one can force them. If that procedure does not result in termination of the failure by the Member State, an action for breach of Union law may be brought before the Court of Justice. If the Court finds that an obligation has not been fulfilled, the Member State concerned must terminate the breach without delay. If, after new proceedings are initiated by the commission,
5254-512: Was held on 28 November 1954 in a building known as Villa Vauban , the seat until 1959 when it would move to the Côte d'Eich building and then to the Palais building in 1972. In 1965, the member states established Luxembourg City as the permanent seat of the Court. Future judicial bodies (Court of First Instance and Civil Service Tribunal) would also be based in the city. The decision was confirmed by
5328-535: Was opposed by France due to its protectionism , and Jean Monnet thought it too large and difficult a task. In the end, Monnet proposed the creation of separate atomic energy and economic communities to reconcile both groups. The Intergovernmental Conference on the Common Market and Euratom at the Château of Val-Duchesse in 1956 drew up the essentials of the new treaties. Euratom would foster cooperation in
5402-473: Was particularly critical of the court's judgment Mangold v Helm , which over-ruled a German law that would discriminate in favour of older workers. In 2011, the President of the Constitutional Court of Belgium , Marc Bossuyt , said that both the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights were taking on more powers by extending their competences, creating
5476-421: Was ratified in 1993, and created the European Union . The name of the Court did not change unlike the other institutions. The power of the Court resided in the Community pillar (the first pillar). The Court gained power in 1997, with the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty . Issues from the third pillar were transferred to the first pillar. Previously, these issues were settled between the member states. Following
#154845