Misplaced Pages

#370629

84-451: (Redirected from Level Two ) Level 2 or Level II may refer to: Technology [ edit ] level 2 cache , a type of cache computer memory Level 2, a level of automation in a self-driving car (see Autonomous car#Classification ) A NASDAQ price quotation service Level II, the full and raw dataset from the U.S. National Weather Service's WSR-88D weather radar Level 2, one of

168-443: A multi-core processor ), in which case the copy in the cache may become out-of-date or stale. Alternatively, when a CPU in a multiprocessor system updates data in the cache, copies of data in caches associated with other CPUs become stale. Communication protocols between the cache managers that keep the data consistent are known as cache coherence protocols. Cache performance measurement has become important in recent times where

252-423: A 96 KiB L1 instruction cache (and 128 KiB L1 data cache), and Intel Ice Lake -based processors from 2018, having 48 KiB L1 data cache and 48 KiB L1 instruction cache. In 2020, some Intel Atom CPUs (with up to 24 cores) have (multiple of) 4.5 MiB and 15 MiB cache sizes. Data is transferred between memory and cache in blocks of fixed size, called cache lines or cache blocks . When

336-422: A cache line is copied from memory into the cache, a cache entry is created. The cache entry will include the copied data as well as the requested memory location (called a tag). When the processor needs to read or write a location in memory, it first checks for a corresponding entry in the cache. The cache checks for the contents of the requested memory location in any cache lines that might contain that address. If

420-431: A common virtual address space. A program executes by calculating, comparing, reading and writing to addresses of its virtual address space, rather than addresses of physical address space, making programs simpler and thus easier to write. Virtual memory requires the processor to translate virtual addresses generated by the program into physical addresses in main memory. The portion of the processor that does this translation

504-429: A direct-mapped cache, closer to the miss rate of a fully associative cache. Comparing with a direct-mapped cache, a set associative cache has a reduced number of bits for its cache set index that maps to a cache set, where multiple ways or blocks stays, such as 2 blocks for a 2-way set associative cache and 4 blocks for a 4-way set associative cache. Comparing with a direct mapped cache, the unused cache index bits become

588-410: A goal of processor designers, the concept becoming known as an orthogonal instruction set . The 801 team noticed a side-effect of this concept; when faced with the plethora of possible versions of a given instruction, compiler authors would usually pick a single version. This was typically the one that was implemented in hardware on the low-end machines. That ensured that the machine code generated by

672-400: A location in the main memory, the processor checks whether the data from that location is already in the cache. If so, the processor will read from or write to the cache instead of the much slower main memory. Many modern desktop , server , and industrial CPUs have at least three independent levels of caches (L1, L2 and L3) and different types of caches: Early examples of CPU caches include

756-529: A machine required performance of about 12 MIPS. This would require a significant advance in performance; their current top-of-the-line machine, the IBM System/370 Model 168 of late 1972, offered about 3 MIPS. The group working on this project at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center , including John Cocke , designed a processor for this purpose. To reach the required performance, they considered

840-535: A mapping table held in core memory before every programmed access to main memory. With no caches, and with the mapping table memory running at the same speed as main memory this effectively cut the speed of memory access in half. Two early machines that used a page table in main memory for mapping, the IBM System/360 Model 67 and the GE 645 , both had a small associative memory as a cache for accesses to

924-421: A number of products for their mainframe line. The initial design was a 24-bit processor; that was soon replaced by 32-bit implementations of the same concepts and the original 24-bit 801 was used only into the early 1980s. The 801 was extremely influential in the computer market. Armed with huge amounts of performance data, IBM was able to demonstrate that the simple design was able to easily outperform even

SECTION 10

#1732773384371

1008-505: A part of the tag bits. For example, a 2-way set associative cache contributes 1 bit to the tag and a 4-way set associative cache contributes 2 bits to the tag. The basic idea of the multicolumn cache is to use the set index to map to a cache set as a conventional set associative cache does, and to use the added tag bits to index a way in the set. For example, in a 4-way set associative cache, the two bits are used to index way 00, way 01, way 10, and way 11, respectively. This double cache indexing

1092-428: A particular hardware implementation, it was ultimately performing the same basic task that the compiler was, implementing higher-level instructions as a sequence of machine-specific instructions. Simply removing the microcode and implementing that in the compiler could result in a faster machine. One concern was that programs written for such a machine would take up more memory; some tasks that could be accomplished with

1176-400: A processor called "Panther" in 1985, and finally into a 4-way superscalar design called "America" in 1986. This was a three-chip processor set including an instruction processor that fetches and decodes instructions, a fixed-point processor that shares duty with the instruction processor, and a floating-point processor for those systems that require it. Designed by the 801 team, the final design

1260-418: A single instruction on the 370 would have to be expressed as multiple instructions on the 801. For instance, adding two numbers from memory would require two load-to-register instructions, a register-to-register add, and then a store-to-memory. This could potentially slow the system overall if it had to spend more time reading instructions from memory than it formerly took to decode them. As they continued work on

1344-501: A single line of CISC code. The PL.8 compiler was much more aggressive about avoiding loads and saves, thereby resulting in higher performance even on a CISC processor. In the early 1980s, the lessons learned on the 801 were combined with those from the IBM Advanced Computer Systems project, resulting in an experimental processor called "Cheetah". Cheetah was a 2-way superscalar processor , which evolved into

1428-486: A single memory word, and additions for working with binary-coded decimal , including an adder that could carry across four-bit decimal numbers. When the new version of the 801 was run as a simulator on the 370, the team was surprised to find that code compiled to the 801 and run in the simulator would often run faster than the same source code compiled directly to 370 machine code using the 370's PL/I compiler. When they ported their experimental "PL.8" language back to

1512-402: Is a failed attempt to read or write a piece of data in the cache, which results in a main memory access with much longer latency. There are three kinds of cache misses: instruction read miss, data read miss, and data write miss. Cache read misses from an instruction cache generally cause the largest delay, because the processor, or at least the thread of execution , has to wait (stall) until

1596-399: Is called a "major location mapping", and its latency is equivalent to a direct-mapped access. Extensive experiments in multicolumn cache design shows that the hit ratio to major locations is as high as 90%. If cache mapping conflicts with a cache block in the major location, the existing cache block will be moved to another cache way in the same set, which is called "selected location". Because

1680-474: Is called a stall. As CPUs become faster compared to main memory, stalls due to cache misses displace more potential computation; modern CPUs can execute hundreds of instructions in the time taken to fetch a single cache line from main memory. Various techniques have been employed to keep the CPU busy during this time, including out-of-order execution in which the CPU attempts to execute independent instructions after

1764-520: Is crucial to CPU performance, and so most modern level-1 caches are virtually indexed, which at least allows the MMU's TLB lookup to proceed in parallel with fetching the data from the cache RAM. But virtual indexing is not the best choice for all cache levels. The cost of dealing with virtual aliases grows with cache size, and as a result most level-2 and larger caches are physically indexed. Caches have historically used both virtual and physical addresses for

SECTION 20

#1732773384371

1848-408: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Level 2 cache Other types of caches exist (that are not counted towards the "cache size" of the most important caches mentioned above), such as the translation lookaside buffer (TLB) which is part of the memory management unit (MMU) which most CPUs have. When trying to read from or write to

1932-594: Is equal to the number of cache blocks divided by the number of ways of associativity, what leads to 128 / 4 = 32 sets, and hence 2  = 32 different indices. There are 2  = 64 possible offsets. Since the CPU address is 32 bits wide, this implies 32 − 5 − 6 = 21 bits for the tag field. The original Pentium 4 processor also had an eight-way set associative L2 integrated cache 256 KiB in size, with 128-byte cache blocks. This implies 32 − 8 − 7 = 17 bits for

2016-496: Is extra latency from computing the hash function. Additionally, when it comes time to load a new line and evict an old line, it may be difficult to determine which existing line was least recently used, because the new line conflicts with data at different indexes in each way; LRU tracking for non-skewed caches is usually done on a per-set basis. Nevertheless, skewed-associative caches have major advantages over conventional set-associative ones. A true set-associative cache tests all

2100-399: Is free to choose any entry in the cache to hold the copy, the cache is called fully associative . At the other extreme, if each entry in the main memory can go in just one place in the cache, the cache is direct-mapped . Many caches implement a compromise in which each entry in the main memory can go to any one of N places in the cache, and are described as N-way set associative. For example,

2184-623: Is generally dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) on a separate die or chip, rather than static random-access memory (SRAM). An exception to this is when eDRAM is used for all levels of cache, down to L1. Historically L1 was also on a separate die, however bigger die sizes have allowed integration of it as well as other cache levels, with the possible exception of the last level. Each extra level of cache tends to be bigger and optimized differently. Caches (like for RAM historically) have generally been sized in powers of: 2, 4, 8, 16 etc. KiB ; when up to MiB sizes (i.e. for larger non-L1), very early on

2268-495: Is known as the memory management unit (MMU). The fast path through the MMU can perform those translations stored in the translation lookaside buffer (TLB), which is a cache of mappings from the operating system's page table , segment table, or both. For the purposes of the present discussion, there are three important features of address translation: One early virtual memory system, the IBM M44/44X , required an access to

2352-471: Is no perfect method to choose among the variety of replacement policies available. One popular replacement policy, least-recently used (LRU), replaces the least recently accessed entry. Marking some memory ranges as non-cacheable can improve performance, by avoiding caching of memory regions that are rarely re-accessed. This avoids the overhead of loading something into the cache without having any reuse. Cache entries may also be disabled or locked depending on

2436-454: Is written back to the main memory only when that data is evicted from the cache. For this reason, a read miss in a write-back cache may sometimes require two memory accesses to service: one to first write the dirty location to main memory, and then another to read the new location from memory. Also, a write to a main memory location that is not yet mapped in a write-back cache may evict an already dirty location, thereby freeing that cache space for

2520-567: The Atlas 2 and the IBM System/360 Model 85 in the 1960s. The first CPUs that used a cache had only one level of cache; unlike later level 1 cache, it was not split into L1d (for data) and L1i (for instructions). Split L1 cache started in 1976 with the IBM 801 CPU, became mainstream in the late 1980s, and in 1997 entered the embedded CPU market with the ARMv5TE. In 2015, even sub-dollar SoCs split

2604-567: The IBM 3090 ), various networking devices, and as a vertical microcode execution unit in the 9373 and 9375 processors of the IBM 9370 mainframe family. The original version of the 801 architecture was the basis for the architecture of the IBM ROMP microprocessor used in the IBM RT PC workstation computer and several experimental computers from IBM Research . A derivative of the 801 architecture with 32-bit addressing named Iliad

Level 2 - Misplaced Pages Continue

2688-430: The skewed cache , where the index for way 0 is direct, as above, but the index for way 1 is formed with a hash function . A good hash function has the property that addresses which conflict with the direct mapping tend not to conflict when mapped with the hash function, and so it is less likely that a program will suffer from an unexpectedly large number of conflict misses due to a pathological access pattern. The downside

2772-452: The 370 and compiled applications using it, those applications ran as much as three times as fast as the PL/I versions. This was due to the compiler making RISC-like decisions about how the generated code uses the processor registers, thereby optimizing out as many memory accesses as possible. These were just as expensive on the 370 as the 801, but this cost was normally hidden by the simplicity of

2856-449: The L1 cache. They also have L2 caches and, for larger processors, L3 caches as well. The L2 cache is usually not split, and acts as a common repository for the already split L1 cache. Every core of a multi-core processor has a dedicated L1 cache and is usually not shared between the cores. The L2 cache, and higher-level caches, may be shared between the cores. L4 cache is currently uncommon, and

2940-409: The advantages of a direct-mapped cache is that it allows simple and fast speculation . Once the address has been computed, the one cache index which might have a copy of that location in memory is known. That cache entry can be read, and the processor can continue to work with that data before it finishes checking that the tag actually matches the requested address. The idea of having the processor use

3024-488: The associativity of their caches in low-power states, which acts as a power-saving measure. In order of worse but simple to better but complex: In this cache organization, each location in the main memory can go in only one entry in the cache. Therefore, a direct-mapped cache can also be called a "one-way set associative" cache. It does not have a placement policy as such, since there is no choice of which cache entry's contents to evict. This means that if two locations map to

3108-404: The cache do not have to include that part of the main memory address which is implied by the cache memory's index. Since the cache tags have fewer bits, they require fewer transistors, take less space on the processor circuit board or on the microprocessor chip, and can be read and compared faster. Also LRU algorithm is especially simple since only one bit needs to be stored for each pair. One of

3192-409: The cache performance, reducing the miss rate becomes one of the necessary steps among other steps. Decreasing the access time to the cache also gives a boost to its performance and helps with optimization. The time taken to fetch one cache line from memory (read latency due to a cache miss) matters because the CPU will run out of work while waiting for the cache line. When a CPU reaches this state, it

3276-509: The cache tags, although virtual tagging is now uncommon. If the TLB lookup can finish before the cache RAM lookup, then the physical address is available in time for tag compare, and there is no need for virtual tagging. Large caches, then, tend to be physically tagged, and only small, very low latency caches are virtually tagged. In recent general-purpose CPUs, virtual tagging has been superseded by vhints, as described below. IBM 801 The 801

3360-583: The cache. (The tag, flag and error correction code bits are not included in the size, although they do affect the physical area of a cache.) An effective memory address which goes along with the cache line (memory block) is split ( MSB to LSB ) into the tag, the index and the block offset. The index describes which cache set that the data has been put in. The index length is ⌈ log 2 ⁡ ( s ) ⌉ {\displaystyle \lceil \log _{2}(s)\rceil } bits for s cache sets. The block offset specifies

3444-455: The cached data before the tag match completes can be applied to associative caches as well. A subset of the tag, called a hint , can be used to pick just one of the possible cache entries mapping to the requested address. The entry selected by the hint can then be used in parallel with checking the full tag. The hint technique works best when used in the context of address translation, as explained below. Other schemes have been suggested, such as

Level 2 - Misplaced Pages Continue

3528-412: The compiler would run as fast as possible on the entire lineup. While using other versions of instructions might run even faster on a machine that implemented them in hardware, the complexity of knowing which one to pick on an ever-changing list of machines made this extremely unattractive, and compiler authors largely ignored these possibilities. As a result, the majority of the instructions available in

3612-408: The contents of the cache. To make room for the new entry on a cache miss, the cache may have to evict one of the existing entries. The heuristic it uses to choose the entry to evict is called the replacement policy. The fundamental problem with any replacement policy is that it must predict which existing cache entry is least likely to be used in the future. Predicting the future is difficult, so there

3696-471: The context. If data is written to the cache, at some point it must also be written to main memory; the timing of this write is known as the write policy. In a write-through cache, every write to the cache causes a write to main memory. Alternatively, in a write-back or copy-back cache, writes are not immediately mirrored to the main memory, and the cache instead tracks which locations have been written over, marking them as dirty . The data in these locations

3780-490: The current set (the set has been retrieved by index) to see if this set contains the requested address. If it does, a cache hit occurs. The tag length in bits is as follows: Some authors refer to the block offset as simply the "offset" or the "displacement". The original Pentium 4 processor had a four-way set associative L1 data cache of 8  KiB in size, with 64-byte cache blocks. Hence, there are 8 KiB / 64 = 128 cache blocks. The number of sets

3864-415: The design and improved their compilers, they found that overall program length continued to fall, eventually becoming roughly the same length as those written for the 370. The initially proposed architecture was a machine with sixteen 24-bit registers and without virtual memory . It used a two-operand format in the instruction, so that instructions were generally of the form A = A + B , as opposed to

3948-434: The desired data within the stored data block within the cache row. Typically the effective address is in bytes, so the block offset length is ⌈ log 2 ⁡ ( b ) ⌉ {\displaystyle \lceil \log _{2}(b)\rceil } bits, where b is the number of bytes per data block. The tag contains the most significant bits of the address, which are checked against all rows in

4032-435: The execution of subsequent instructions; the processor can continue until the queue is full. For a detailed introduction to the types of misses, see cache performance measurement and metric . Most general purpose CPUs implement some form of virtual memory . To summarize, either each program running on the machine sees its own simplified address space , which contains code and data for that program only, or all programs run in

4116-425: The following structure: The data block (cache line) contains the actual data fetched from the main memory. The tag contains (part of) the address of the actual data fetched from the main memory. The flag bits are discussed below . The "size" of the cache is the amount of main memory data it can hold. This size can be calculated as the number of bytes stored in each data block times the number of blocks stored in

4200-408: The in-memory page table. Both machines predated the first machine with a cache for main memory, the IBM System/360 Model 85 , so the first hardware cache used in a computer system was not a data or instruction cache, but rather a TLB. Caches can be divided into four types, based on whether the index or tag correspond to physical or virtual addresses: The speed of this recurrence (the load latency )

4284-443: The instruction is fetched from main memory. Cache read misses from a data cache usually cause a smaller delay, because instructions not dependent on the cache read can be issued and continue execution until the data is returned from main memory, and the dependent instructions can resume execution. Cache write misses to a data cache generally cause the shortest delay, because the write can be queued and there are few limitations on

SECTION 50

#1732773384371

4368-545: The instruction set were never used in compiled programs. And it was here that the team made the key realization of the 801 project: Imposing microcode between a computer and its users imposes an expensive overhead in performing the most frequently executed instructions. Microcode takes a non-zero time to examine the instruction before it is performed. The same underlying processor with the microcode removed would eliminate this overhead and run those instructions faster. Since microcode essentially ran small subroutines dedicated to

4452-400: The instruction that is waiting for the cache miss data. Another technology, used by many processors, is simultaneous multithreading (SMT), which allows an alternate thread to use the CPU core while the first thread waits for required CPU resources to become available. The placement policy decides where in the cache a copy of a particular entry of main memory will go. If the placement policy

4536-519: The level-1 data cache in an AMD Athlon is two-way set associative, which means that any particular location in main memory can be cached in either of two locations in the level-1 data cache. Choosing the right value of associativity involves a trade-off . If there are ten places to which the placement policy could have mapped a memory location, then to check if that location is in the cache, ten cache entries must be searched. Checking more places takes more power and chip area, and potentially more time. On

4620-808: The levels in system support Biosafety level 2, a laboratory grade Level 2 market data Music [ edit ] Level II (Eru album) , 2006 Level II (Blackstreet album) , 2003 Level 2 (Last Chance to Reason album) , 2011 Level 2 (Animal X album) , 2001 Other [ edit ] Level II, a skatepark located in the upstairs of the Dee Stadium in Houghton, Michigan "Level Two" ( Arrow ) , an episode of Arrow Level 2 coronavirus restrictions, see COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland#Levels System STANAG 4569 protection level Topics referred to by

4704-434: The local cache are now stale and should be marked invalid. A data cache typically requires two flag bits per cache line – a valid bit and a dirty bit . Having a dirty bit set indicates that the associated cache line has been changed since it was read from main memory ("dirty"), meaning that the processor has written data to that line and the new value has not propagated all the way to main memory. A cache miss

4788-399: The main memory can be cached in either of two locations in the cache, one logical question is: which one of the two? The simplest and most commonly used scheme, shown in the right-hand diagram above, is to use the least significant bits of the memory location's index as the index for the cache memory, and to have two entries for each index. One benefit of this scheme is that the tags stored in

4872-633: The major location in a cache block. Multicolumn cache remains a high hit ratio due to its high associativity, and has a comparable low latency to a direct-mapped cache due to its high percentage of hits in major locations. The concepts of major locations and selected locations in multicolumn cache have been used in several cache designs in ARM Cortex R chip, Intel's way-predicting cache memory, IBM's reconfigurable multi-way associative cache memory and Oracle's dynamic cache replacement way selection based on address tab bits. Cache row entries usually have

4956-509: The most powerful classic CPU designs, while at the same time producing machine code that was only marginally larger than the heavily optimized CISC instructions. Applying these same techniques even to existing processors like the System/370 generally doubled the performance of those systems as well. This demonstrated the value of the RISC concept, and all of IBM's future systems were based on

5040-419: The new memory location. There are intermediate policies as well. The cache may be write-through, but the writes may be held in a store data queue temporarily, usually so multiple stores can be processed together (which can reduce bus turnarounds and improve bus utilization). Cached data from the main memory may be changed by other entities (e.g., peripherals using direct memory access (DMA) or another core in

5124-404: The newly indexed cache block is a most recently used (MRU) block, it is placed in the major location in multicolumn cache with a consideration of temporal locality. Since multicolumn cache is designed for a cache with a high associativity, the number of ways in each set is high; thus, it is easy find a selected location in the set. A selected location index by an additional hardware is maintained for

SECTION 60

#1732773384371

5208-445: The number of registers to be increased from sixteen to thirty-two, a change that had been obvious from the examination of 801 code. Despite the expansion of the instruction words from 24 to 32-bits, programs did not grow by the corresponding 33% due to avoided loads and saves due to these two changes. Other desirable additions include instructions for working with string data that was encoded in "packed" format with several characters in

5292-540: The other hand, caches with more associativity suffer fewer misses (see conflict misses ), so that the CPU wastes less time reading from the slow main memory. The general guideline is that doubling the associativity, from direct mapped to two-way, or from two-way to four-way, has about the same effect on raising the hit rate as doubling the cache size. However, increasing associativity more than four does not improve hit rate as much, and are generally done for other reasons (see virtual aliasing ). Some CPUs can dynamically reduce

5376-469: The pattern broke down, to allow for larger caches without being forced into the doubling-in-size paradigm, with e.g. Intel Core 2 Duo with 3 MiB L2 cache in April 2008. This happened much later for L1 caches, as their size is generally still a small number of KiB. The IBM zEC12 from 2012 is an exception however, to gain unusually large 96 KiB L1 data cache for its time, and e.g. the IBM z13 having

5460-422: The possible ways simultaneously, using something like a content-addressable memory . A pseudo-associative cache tests each possible way one at a time. A hash-rehash cache and a column-associative cache are examples of a pseudo-associative cache. In the common case of finding a hit in the first way tested, a pseudo-associative cache is as fast as a direct-mapped cache, but it has a much lower conflict miss rate than

5544-678: The principles developed during the 801 project. For his work on the 801, John Cocke was recognized with several awards and medals, including the Turing Award in 1987, National Medal of Technology in 1991, and the National Medal of Science in 1994. In 1974, IBM began examining the possibility of constructing a telephone switch to handle one million calls an hour, or about 300 calls per second. They calculated that each call would require 20,000 instructions to complete, and when timing overhead and other considerations were added, such

5628-409: The processor finds that the memory location is in the cache, a cache hit has occurred. However, if the processor does not find the memory location in the cache, a cache miss has occurred. In the case of a cache hit, the processor immediately reads or writes the data in the cache line. For a cache miss, the cache allocates a new entry and copies data from main memory, then the request is fulfilled from

5712-441: The programmer to select the exact variation that they needed for any particular task. The processor would read that instruction and use microcode to break it into a series of internal instructions. For instance, adding two numbers in memory might be implemented by loading those two numbers into registers, adding them, and then storing the sum back to memory. The idea of offering all possible addressing modes for all instructions became

5796-433: The same machine language code. On the high-end machines, many of these instructions were implemented directly in hardware, like a floating point unit, while low-end machines could instead simulate those instructions using a sequence of other instructions encoded in microcode. This allowed a single application binary interface to run across the entire lineup and allowed the customers to feel confident that if more performance

5880-405: The same entry, they may continually knock each other out. Although simpler, a direct-mapped cache needs to be much larger than an associative one to give comparable performance, and it is more unpredictable. Let x be block number in cache, y be block number of memory, and n be number of blocks in cache, then mapping is done with the help of the equation x = y mod n . If each location in

5964-428: The same simplified processor design would work just as well for a general-purpose minicomputer as a special-purpose switch. This conclusion flew in the face of contemporary processor design, which was based on the concept of using microcode . IBM had been among the first to make widespread use of this technique as part of their System/360 series. The 360s, and 370s, came in a variety of performance levels that all ran

6048-411: The same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Level 2 . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Level_2&oldid=1134440785 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description

6132-486: The simple code in a telephone switch could be written to use only these types of instructions. The result of this work was a conceptual design for a simplified processor with the required performance. The telephone switch project was canceled in 1975, but the team had made considerable progress on the concept and in October IBM decided to continue it as a general-purpose design. With no obvious project to attach it to,

6216-419: The sort of operations such a machine required and removed any that were not appropriate. This led to the removal of a floating-point unit for instance, which would not be needed in this application. More critically, they also removed many of the instructions that worked on data in main memory and left only those instructions that worked on the internal processor registers , as these were much faster to use and

6300-418: The speed gap between the memory performance and the processor performance is increasing exponentially. The cache was introduced to reduce this speed gap. Thus knowing how well the cache is able to bridge the gap in the speed of processor and memory becomes important, especially in high-performance systems. The cache hit rate and the cache miss rate play an important role in determining this performance. To improve

6384-507: The tag field. An instruction cache requires only one flag bit per cache row entry: a valid bit. The valid bit indicates whether or not a cache block has been loaded with valid data. On power-up, the hardware sets all the valid bits in all the caches to "invalid". Some systems also set a valid bit to "invalid" at other times, such as when multi-master bus snooping hardware in the cache of one processor hears an address broadcast from some other processor, and realizes that certain data blocks in

6468-562: The team decided to call it the "801" after the building they worked in. For the general-purpose role, the team began to consider real-world programs that would be run on a typical minicomputer . IBM had collected enormous amounts of statistical data on the performance of real-world workloads on their machines and this data demonstrated that over half the time in a typical program was spent performing only five instructions: load value from memory, store value to memory, branch, compare fixed-point numbers, and add fixed-point numbers. This suggested that

6552-473: The three-operand format, A = B + C . The resulting CPU was operational by the summer of 1980 and was implemented using Motorola MECL-10K discrete component technology on large wire-wrapped custom boards. The CPU was clocked at 66 ns cycles (approximately 15.15 MHz) and could compute at the fast speed of approximately 15  MIPS . The 801 architecture was used in a variety of IBM devices, including channel controllers for their S/370 mainframes (such as

6636-399: The two-operand format, one of the two values was overwritten with the result, and it was often the case that one of the values had to be re-loaded from memory. By moving to a 32-bit format, the extra bits in the instruction words allowed an additional register to be specified, so that the output of such operations could be directed to a separate register. The larger instruction word also allowed

6720-442: Was a must-have feature. Additionally, by the 1980s the computer world as a whole was moving towards 32-bit systems, and there was a desire to do the same with the 801. Moving to a 32-bit format had another significant advantage. In practice, it was found that the two-operand format was difficult to use in typical math code. Ideally, both input operands would remain in registers where they could be reused in subsequent operations. In

6804-451: Was an experimental central processing unit (CPU) design developed by IBM during the 1970s. It is considered to be the first modern RISC design, relying on processor registers for all computations and eliminating the many variant addressing modes found in CISC designs. Originally developed as the processor for a telephone switch , it was later used as the basis for a minicomputer and

6888-460: Was ever needed they could move up to a faster machine without any other changes. Microcode allowed a simple processor to offer many instructions, which had been used by the designers to implement a wide variety of addressing modes . For instance, an instruction like ADD might have a dozen versions, one that adds two numbers in internal registers, one that adds a register to a value in memory, one that adds two values from memory, etc. This allowed

6972-473: Was intended to serve as the primary processor of the unsuccessful Fort Knox midrange system project. Having been originally designed for a limited-function system, the 801 design lacked a number of features seen on larger machines. Notable among these was the lack of hardware support for virtual memory , which was not needed for the controller role and had been implemented in software on early 801 systems that needed it. For more widespread use, hardware support

7056-561: Was sent to IBM's Austin office in 1986, where it was developed into the IBM RS/6000 system. The RS/6000 running at 25 MHz was one of the fastest machines of its era. It outperformed other RISC machines by two to three times on common tests, and easily outperformed older CISC systems. After the RS/6000, the company turned its attention to a version of the 801 concepts that could be efficiently fabricated at various scales. The result

#370629