Misplaced Pages

#49950

55-586: Basel III is the third Basel Accord , a framework that sets international standards for bank capital adequacy , stress testing , and liquidity requirements. Augmenting and superseding parts of the Basel II standards, it was developed in response to the deficiencies in financial regulation revealed by the financial crisis of 2007–08 . It is intended to strengthen bank capital requirements by increasing minimum capital requirements, holdings of high quality liquid assets , and decreasing bank leverage . Basel III

110-495: A back-stop to the risk-based capital metrics. The banks are expected to maintain a leverage ratio in excess of 3% under Basel III. For typical mortgage lenders, who underwrite assets of a low risk weighting, the leverage ratio will often be the binding capital metric. In 2013, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that the minimum Basel III leverage ratio would be 5% for eight systemically important financial institution (SIFI) banks and 6% for their insured bank holding companies. In

165-425: A classical multilateral organization, in part because it has no founding treaty. BCBS does not issue binding regulation; rather, it functions as an informal forum in which policy solutions and standards are developed. The Basel Committee formulates broad supervisory standards and guidelines and recommends statements of best practice in banking supervision (see bank regulation or " Basel III Accord", for example) in

220-468: A forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision worldwide. The committee frames guidelines and standards in different areas – some of the better known among them are the international standards on capital adequacy, the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision and

275-545: A minimum "leverage ratio" from 2018 based on a leverage exposure definition published in 2014. A revised exposure definition and a buffer for globally systemically important banks (G-SIBs) will be effective from 2023. The ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by the bank's leverage exposure. The leverage exposure is the sum of the exposures of all on-balance sheet assets, 'add-ons' for derivative exposures and securities financing transactions (SFTs), and credit conversion factors for off-balance sheet items. The ratio acts as

330-533: A result of the committee's recommendations - thus some time may pass and, potentially, some unilateral changes may be made, between the international recommendations for minimum standards being agreed and implementation as law at the national level. The regulatory standards published by the committee are commonly known as Basel Accords. They are called the Basel Accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at

385-557: A revised securitisation framework, and a standardised approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) to measure exposure to derivative transactions. A specific framework for exposures to central counterparty clearing was introduced. The BCBS also published regulatory standards for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR); In subsequent years, the Basel Committee updated

440-553: A rise in bank funding costs, due to higher capital requirements, to their customers. To meet the capital requirements originally effective in 2015 banks were estimated to increase their lending spreads on average by about 15 basis points . Capital requirements effective as of 2019 (7% for the common equity ratio, 8.5% for the Tier 1 capital ratio) could increase bank lending spreads by about 50 basis points . The estimated effects on GDP growth assume no active response from monetary policy. To

495-497: A short period of time. The LCR consists of two parts: the numerator is the value of HQLA, and the denominator consists of the total net cash outflows over a specified stress period (total expected cash outflows minus total expected cash inflows). The Liquidity Coverage Ratio applies to U.S. banking operations with assets of more than $ 10 billion. The proposal would require: The US proposal divides qualifying HQLAs into three specific categories (Level 1, Level 2A, and Level 2B). Across

550-648: A vulnerability. A few critics argue that capitalization regulation is inherently fruitless due to these and similar problems and—despite an opposite ideological view of regulation—agree that "too big to fail" persists. Basel III has been criticized similarly for its paper burden and risk inhibition by banks, organized in the Institute of International Finance , an international association of global banks based in Washington, D.C. , who argue that it would "hurt" both their business and overall economic growth. Basel III

605-685: Is a committee of banking supervisory authorities that was established by the central bank governors of the Group of Ten (G10) countries in 1974. The committee expanded its membership in 2009 and then again in 2014. As of 2019, the BCBS has 45 members from 28 jurisdictions, consisting of central banks and authorities with responsibility of banking regulation. The committee agrees on standards for bank capital, liquidity and funding. Those standards are non-binding high-level principles. Members are expected but not obliged to undertake effort to implement them e.g. through domestic regulation. The committee provides

SECTION 10

#1732783289050

660-511: Is composed of 4.5% of CET1, plus an extra 1.5% of Additional Tier 1 (AT1). CET1 capital comprises shareholders equity (including audited profits), less deductions of accounting reserve that are not believed to be loss absorbing "today", including goodwill and other intangible assets. To prevent the potential of double-counting of capital across the economy, bank's holdings of other bank shares are also deducted. Furthermore, Basel III introduced two additional capital buffers: Basel III introduced

715-477: Is generally seen as a major contributor to the US housing bubble . Academics have criticized Basel III for continuing to allow large banks to calculate credit risk using internal models and for setting overall minimum capital requirements too low. Opaque treatment of all derivatives contracts is also criticized. While institutions have many legitimate ("hedging", "insurance") risk reduction reasons to deal in derivatives,

770-579: The Bank for International Settlements in Basel , Switzerland and the committee normally meets there. The Basel Accords is a set of recommendations for regulations in the banking industry . Deliberations by central bankers from major countries resulted in the Basel Capital Accord , which was published in 1988 and covered capital requirements for credit risk . The Accord was enforced by law in

825-630: The Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms , are sometimes referred to as Basel IV. However, the secretary general of the Basel Committee said, in a 2016 speech, that he did not believe the changes are substantial enough to warrant that title and the Basel Committee refer to only three Basel Accords . Basel III aims to strengthen the requirements in the Basel II regulatory standards for banks. In addition to increasing capital requirements , it introduces requirements on liquid asset holdings and funding stability, thereby seeking to mitigate

880-425: The Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms , the market risk framework, and the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements were extended by one year, to 1 January 2023. Basel Accords Basel I was developed through deliberations among central bankers from major countries. In 1988, the Basel Committee published a set of minimum capital requirements for banks. This is also known as the 1988 Basel Accord, and

935-524: The Current Exposure Method , became effective in 2017. SA-CCR is used to measure the potential future exposure of derivative transactions in the leverage exposure measure and non-modelled Risk Weighted Asset calculations. Capital requirements for equity investments in funds were introduced in 2017. A framework for limiting large exposure to external and internal counterparties was implemented in 2018. A revised securitisation framework

990-474: The Group of Ten (G-10) countries in 1992. The Basel Accord was augmented in 1996 with a framework for market risk , which included both a standardised approach and a modelled approach, the latter based on value at risk . Published in 2004, Basel II was a new capital framework to supersede the Basel I framework. It introduced "three pillars": Capital requirements for operational risk were introduced for

1045-682: The International Organization of Securities Commissions and International Association of Insurance Supervisors together make up the Joint Forum of international financial regulators. However, the committee is not autonomous. Although it has latitude, its work is reported to the central bank governors of the G10. It cannot communicate conclusions, nor make proposals, to bodies outside the Bank for International Settlements without

1100-712: The United Kingdom , and the United States . The committee's Secretariat is located at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel , Switzerland. However, the BIS and the Basel Committee remain two distinct entities. Until 2009, members included only developed countries: Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and the United States. The Basel committee along with its sister organizations,

1155-563: The University of California, Berkeley Robert Reich has argued that Basel III did not go far enough to regulate banks since, he believed, inadequate regulation was a cause of the global financial crisis and remains an unresolved issue despite the severity of the impact of the Great Recession . In 2019, American investor Michael Burry criticized Basel III for what he characterizes as "more or less remov[ing] price discovery from

SECTION 20

#1732783289050

1210-402: The central bank governors of the G10 countries. Globalization in banking and financial markets was not accompanied by global regulation. National regulators remained the most important actors in banking practices. They had a capacity problem and an information problem. Therefore, the purpose of the BCBS is to encourage convergence toward common approaches and standards. The committee is not

1265-429: The credit markets , meaning risk does not have an accurate pricing mechanism in interest rates anymore." Before the enactment of Basel III in 2011, the Institute of International Finance (IIF, a Washington, D.C.–based, 450-member banking trade association), argued against the implementation of the accords, claiming it would hurt banks and economic growth. The American Banker's Association, community banks organized in

1320-456: The financial crisis of 2007–2008 , the Basel III reforms were published in 2010/11. The standards set new definitions of capital, higher capital ratio requirements, and a leverage ratio requirement as a "back stop" measure. Risk-based capital requirements (RWAs) for CVA risk and interest rate risk in the banking book were introduced for the first time, along with a large exposures framework,

1375-543: The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) released the final version of its "Supervisory Framework for Measuring and Controlling Large Exposures" (SFLE) that builds on longstanding BCBS guidance on credit exposure concentrations. On 3 September 2014, the U.S. banking agencies (Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) issued their final rule implementing

1430-509: The Basel II rules, the others being regulated under the Basel I framework. However Basel II standards were criticised by some for allowing banks to take on too much risk with too little capital. This was considered part of the cause of the US subprime mortgage crisis , which started in 2008. The Basel 2.5 revisions introduced stressed VaR and IRC for modelled market risk in 2009-10. Following

1485-517: The Basel III accords: Since derivatives present major unknowns in a crisis these are seen as major failings by some critics causing several to claim that the " too big to fail " status remains with respect to major derivatives dealers who aggressively took on risk of an event they did not believe would happen—but did. As Basel III does not absolutely require extreme scenarios that management flatly rejects to be included in stress testing this remains

1540-671: The Basel III rules, despite differences in ratio requirements and calculations. The implementing act of the Basel III agreements in the European Union has been the new legislative package comprising Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV) and Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (CRR). The new package, approved in 2013, replaced the Capital Requirements Directives (2006/48 and 2006/49). On 7 December 2017, ECB chief Mario Draghi declared that for

1595-585: The Basel III, may further contribute to these skewed incentives. New liquidity regulation, notwithstanding its good intentions, is another likely candidate to increase bank incentives to exploit regulation. In an October 24, 2020 speech at the Bund Financial Summit in Shanghai, Jack Ma described the Basel Accords as a "club for the elderly." Basel Committee on Banking Supervision The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ( BCBS )

1650-476: The Concordat on cross-border banking supervision. The committee's Secretariat is located at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel , Switzerland. The BIS hosts and supports a number of international institutions engaged in standard setting and financial stability, one of which is BCBS. Yet like the other committees, BCBS has its own governance arrangements, reporting lines and agendas, guided by

1705-510: The EU, whilst banks have been required to disclose their leverage ratio since 2015, a binding requirement has not yet been implemented. The UK operates its own leverage ratio regime, with a binding minimum requirement for banks with deposits greater than £50bn of 3.25%. This higher minimum reflects the PRA's differing treatment of the leverage ratio, which excludes central bank reserves in 'Total exposure' of

Basel III - Misplaced Pages Continue

1760-643: The Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), announced in December 2017 that the implementation date of these reforms, which were originally set to be effective in 2019, was delayed to 1 January 2022. In March 2020, the implementation date was delayed to 1 January 2023. The Basel 3.1 standards published in 2017 cover further reforms in six areas: standardised approach for credit risk (SA-CR); internal ratings based approach (IRB) for credit risk; CVA risk ; operational risk ; an output floor; and

1815-574: The Independent Community Bankers of America, and some of the most liberal Democrats in the U.S. Congress, including the entire Maryland congressional delegation with Democratic Sens. Cardin and Mikulski and Reps. Van Hollen and Cummings, voiced opposition to Basel III in their comments submitted to FDIC, saying that the Basel III proposals, if implemented, would hurt small banks by increasing "their capital holdings dramatically on mortgage and small business loans." In January 2013

1870-492: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The LCR is a short-term liquidity measure intended to ensure that banking organizations maintain a sufficient pool of liquid assets to cover net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period. On 11 March 2016, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released the second of three proposals on public disclosure of regulatory metrics and qualitative data by banking institutions. The proposal requires disclosures on market risk to be more granular for both

1925-565: The banks of the European Union, the Basel III reforms were complete. In the United States higher capital requirements resulted in contractions in trading operations and the number of personnel employed on trading floors. An OECD study, released on 17 February 2011, estimated that the medium-term impact of Basel III implementation on GDP growth would be in the range of −0.05% to −0.15% per year. Economic output would be mainly affected by an increase in bank lending spreads, as banks pass

1980-874: The calculation. Basel III introduced two required liquidity/funding ratios. In 2013, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors approved an interagency proposal for the U.S. version of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)'s Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The ratio would apply to certain U.S. banking organizations and other systemically important financial institutions. The United States' LCR proposal came out significantly tougher than BCBS's version, especially for larger bank holding companies. The proposal requires financial institutions and FSOC designated nonbank financial companies to have an adequate stock of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) that can be quickly liquidated to meet liquidity needs over

2035-457: The categories, the combination of Level 2A and 2B assets cannot exceed 40% HQLA with 2B assets limited to a maximum of 15% of HQLA. The proposal requires that the LCR be at least equal to or greater than 1.0 and includes a multiyear transition period that would require: 80% compliance starting 1 January 2015, 90% compliance starting 1 January 2016, and 100% compliance starting 1 January 2017. Lastly,

2090-415: The changes are substantial enough to warrant that title and the Basel Committee refer to only three Basel Accords. These new standards came into effect on 1 January 2023, although national implementation of the standards is generally running behind this schedule and still ongoing. The framework's approach to risk which is based on risk weights derived from the past was criticised for failing to account for

2145-752: The enhancement introduced by the Basel III standard, it argued that "markets often fail to discipline large banks to hold prudent capital levels and make sound investment decisions". Think tanks such as the World Pensions Council have argued that Basel III merely builds on and further expands the existing Basel II regulatory base without fundamentally questioning its core tenets, notably the ever-growing reliance on standardized assessments of "credit risk" marketed by two private sector agencies- Moody's and S&P , thus using public policy to strengthen anti-competitive duopolistic practices. The conflicted and unreliable credit ratings of these agencies

2200-554: The expectation that member authorities and other nations' authorities will take steps to implement them through their own national systems. Currently, committee members come from Argentina , Australia , Belgium , Brazil , Canada , China , the European Union , France , Germany , Hong Kong , India , Indonesia , Italy , Japan , Korea , Luxembourg , Mexico , the Netherlands , Russia , Saudi Arabia , Singapore , South Africa , Spain , Sweden , Switzerland , Turkey ,

2255-417: The extent that monetary policy would no longer be constrained by the zero lower bound, the Basel III impact on economic output could be offset by a reduction (or delayed increase) in monetary policy rates by about 30 to 80 basis points . Basel III was also criticized as negatively affecting the stability of the financial system by increasing incentives of banks to game the regulatory framework. Notwithstanding

Basel III - Misplaced Pages Continue

2310-410: The first time. The ratio of equity and credit is 8% under Basel II. The standards were revised several times during subsequent years. Bank regulators in the United States took the position of requiring a bank to follow the set of rules (Basel I or Basel II) giving the more conservative approach for the bank. Because of this it was anticipated that only the few very largest US banks would operate under

2365-431: The global banking sector won a significant easing of Basel III rules, when the BCBS extended not only the implementation schedule to 2019, but broadened the definition of liquid assets. In December 2017, the Basel Committee's oversight body, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), extended the implementation of the market risk framework from 2019 to 1 January 2022. In March 2020, implementation of

2420-491: The leverage ratio. The GHOS announced in March 2020 that the implementation date of these reforms, which were originally set to be effective at the start of 2022, was delayed to 1 January 2023. As of September 2010, proposed Basel III norms asked for ratios as: 7–9.5% (4.5% + 2.5% (conservation buffer) + 0–2.5% (seasonal buffer)) for common equity and 8.5–11% for Tier 1 capital and 10.5–13% for total capital. On 15 April 2014,

2475-481: The other G-20 major economies are represented, as well as some other major banking locales such as Hong Kong and Singapore . The Committee does not have the authority to enforce recommendations, although most member countries as well as some other countries tend to implement the Committee's policies. This means that recommendations are enforced through national (or EU -wide) laws and regulations, rather than as

2530-422: The proposal requires both sets of firms (large bank holding companies and regional firms) subject to the LCR requirements to submit remediation plans to U.S. regulators to address what actions would be taken if the LCR falls below 100% for three or more consecutive days. A new framework for exposures to CCPs was introduced in 2017. The standardised approach for counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR), which replaced

2585-406: The risk of a bank run . The Basel Accords have been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework , which comprises all of the current and forthcoming standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Formerly, the Basel Committee consisted of representatives from central banks and regulatory authorities of the Group of Ten countries plus Luxembourg and Spain . Since 2009, all of

2640-492: The risk of a run on the bank . The original Basel III rule from 2010 required banks to fund themselves with 4.5% of Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) (up from 2% in Basel II) of risk-weighted assets (RWAs). Since 2015, a minimum CET1 ratio of 4.5% must be maintained at all times by the bank. This ratio is calculated as follows: The minimum Tier 1 capital increases from 4% in Basel II to 6%, applicable in 2015, over RWAs. This 6%

2695-418: The standardized approach and regulatory approval of internal models. The US Federal Reserve announced in December 2011 that it would implement substantially all of the Basel III rules. It summarized them as follows, and made clear they would apply not only to banks but also to all institutions with more than US$ 50 billion in assets: As of January 2014, the United States has been on track to implement many of

2750-466: The standards for market risk, based on a “ Fundamental Review of the Trading Book ” (FRTB). In addition, further reforms of the framework were published by the Basel Committee in 2017 under the title Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms . These reforms were sometimes referred to as "Basel IV". However, the secretary general of the Basel Committee said, in a 2016 speech, that he did not believe

2805-543: The uncertainty in the future. A recent OECD study suggest that bank regulation based on the Basel accords encourage unconventional business practices and contributed to or even reinforced adverse systemic shocks that materialised during the financial crisis. According to the study, capital regulation based on risk-weighted assets encourages innovation designed to circumvent regulatory requirements and shifts banks' focus away from their core economic functions. Tighter capital requirements based on risk-weighted assets, introduced in

SECTION 50

#1732783289050

2860-778: Was also criticized as negatively affecting the stability of the financial system by increasing incentives of banks to game the regulatory framework. The American Bankers Association , community banks organized in the Independent Community Bankers of America , and others voiced opposition to Basel III in their comments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , saying that the Basel III proposals, if implemented, would hurt small banks by increasing "their capital holdings dramatically on mortgage and small business loans". Former US Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at

2915-410: Was enforced by law in the Group of Ten (G-10) countries in 1992. A new set of rules known as Basel II was developed and published in 2004 to supersede the Basel I accords. Basel III was a set of enhancements to in response to the financial crisis of 2007–2008 . It does not supersede either Basel I or II but focuses on reforms to the Basel II framework to address specific issues, including related to

2970-458: Was introduced, which took effect in 2018. New rules for interest rate risk in the banking book became effective in 2018. Following a Fundamental Review of the Trading Book , minimum capital requirements for market risk in the trading book will be based on a better calibrated standardised approach or internal model approval (IMA) for an expected shortfall measure rather than, under Basel II, value at risk . The Basel Committee's oversight body,

3025-637: Was published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in November 2010, and was scheduled to be introduced from 2013 until 2015; however, implementation was extended repeatedly to 1 January 2022 and then again until 1 January 2023, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic . The new standards that come into effect in January 2023, that is, the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) and

#49950