Misplaced Pages

#147852

49-605: Sebastjan Kamenik serves as the president of the Association. The association participated in disability rights procedures at the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Slovenia . In 2014, the Constitutional Court ruled that all polling places in elections should be accessible for disabled people. Together with a group of disabled persons, In 2016, Drupis initiated another procedure claiming that

98-710: A compensation of 3000 Euros for each discriminated person. Drupis also submitted a third party intervention in the European Court of Human Rights cases Toplak against Slovenia and Mrak against Slovenia. In January 2020, the Court communicated the cases with the government of Slovenia. The case is ongoing. Drupis supports Kamenik's case filed with the European Court of Human Rights in which he claims that his secret ballot has been violated when Slovenia has not provided proper equipment and instruction during elections. Supreme Court of Slovenia The Supreme Court of

147-674: A 2015 referendum on gay marriage. Slovenia's Supreme Court had ruled that voters had not had a right to request accessible polling places ahead of the vote, but only after the election would be over. Slovenia's Supreme Court stated that no court in Slovenia had jurisdiction over such cases. The ECHR found a violation of Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights . The Court, however, allowed states to not use equipment which voters with disabilities use for casting secret ballots . "We feel that we are second class citizens [to]

196-589: A bond that is not only regional or geographic: a State cannot be party to the European Convention on Human Rights if it is not a member of the Council of Europe; it cannot be a member State of the Council of Europe if it does not respect pluralist democracy, the rule of law and human rights. So a non-democratic State could not participate in the ECHR system: the protection of democracy goes hand in hand with

245-516: A broad interpretation, taking for instance that prohibition of private consensual homosexual acts violates this article. There have been cases discussing consensual familial sexual relationships, and how the criminalisation of this may violate this article. However, the ECHR still allows such familial sexual acts to be criminal. This may be compared to the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court, which has also adopted

294-446: A case to the court. Judgments finding violations are binding on the states concerned and they are obliged to execute them. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe monitors the execution of judgments, particularly to ensure payments awarded by the court appropriately compensate applicants for the damage they have sustained. The convention has sixteen protocols , which amend the convention framework. The convention has had

343-406: A criminal offence at the time of its commission. The article states that a criminal offence is one under either national or international law, which would permit a party to prosecute someone for a crime which was not illegal under domestic law at the time, so long as it was prohibited by international law . The Article also prohibits a heavier penalty being imposed than was applicable at the time when

392-667: A direct response to twin concerns. First, in the aftermath of the Second World War , the convention, drawing on the inspiration of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , can be seen as part of a wider response from the Allied powers in delivering a human rights agenda to prevent the most serious human rights violations which had occurred during the Second World War from happening again. Second,

441-427: A divorced parent to his/her child). Notable cases: Article 9 provides a right to freedom of thought , conscience and religion . This includes the freedom to change a religion or belief, and to manifest a religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society". Relevant cases are: Article 10 provides

490-410: A language they understand, of the reasons for the arrest and any charge they face, the right of prompt access to judicial proceedings to determine the legality of the arrest or detention, to trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial, and the right to compensation in the case of arrest or detention in violation of this article. Article 6 provides a detailed right to a fair trial , including

539-661: A permanent mandate. UN Member State ( UNSC Member · ECOSOC Member ) EU Member State ( Eurozone Member · Schengen Area Member ) NATO Member State Council of Europe Member State OECD Member State The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia was formally established on 23 December 1991. In practice, the Supreme Court has operated since 25 June 1991 when Slovenia gained independence from Yugoslavia . This article about politics in Slovenia

SECTION 10

#1732780807148

588-548: A report to the Assembly proposing a list of rights to be protected, selecting a number from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that had recently been agreed to in New York, and defining how the enforcing judicial mechanism might operate. After extensive debates, the Assembly sent its final proposal to the council's Committee of Ministers, which convened a group of experts to draft the convention itself. The convention

637-459: A significant influence on the law in Council of Europe member countries and is widely considered the most effective international treaty for human rights protection. The European Convention on Human Rights has played an important role in the development and awareness of human rights in Europe. The development of a regional system of human rights protections operating across Europe can be seen as

686-475: A somewhat broad interpretation of the right to privacy . Furthermore, Article 8 sometimes comprises positive obligations : whereas classical human rights are formulated as prohibiting a state from interfering with rights, and thus not to do something (e.g. not to separate a family under family life protection), the effective enjoyment of such rights may also include an obligation for the state to become active, and to do something (e.g. to enforce access for

735-487: A state's margin of appreciation . In Vo v France , the court declined to extend the right to life to an unborn child, while stating that "it is neither desirable, nor even possible as matters stand, to answer in the abstract the question whether the unborn child is a person for the purposes of Article 2 of the Convention". The court has ruled that states have three main duties under Article 2: The first paragraph of

784-560: A suspect or fugitive, or suppressing riots or insurrections, will not contravene the Article when the use of force involved is "no more than absolutely necessary". Signatory states to the convention can only derogate from the rights contained in Article 2 for deaths which result from lawful acts of war. The European Court of Human Rights did not rule upon the right to life until 1995, when in McCann and Others v United Kingdom it ruled that

833-568: Is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . European Convention on Human Rights The European Convention on Human Rights ( ECHR ; formally the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ) is an international convention to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe . Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe ,

882-613: The Congress of Europe in The Hague . At the end of the Congress, a declaration and following pledge to create the convention was issued. The second and third articles of the pledge state: "We desire a Charter of Human Rights guaranteeing liberty of thought, assembly and expression as well as right to form a political opposition. We desire a Court of Justice with adequate sanctions for the implementation of this Charter." The convention

931-539: The University of Primorska , University of Maribor , Alma Mater Europaea , and Nova University. The Slovenian authorities responded to the proposal with an action plan. The matter has not yet been decided by the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers and the case is pending. In November 2019, the Association initiated a class action procedure against Slovenia. It claimed that elections, polling stations, and voting procedures had not been accessible. It requested

980-403: The "confrontation clause" of Article 6 (i.e. the right to examine witnesses or have them examined). In this respect, problems of compliance with Article 6 may arise when national laws allow the use in evidence of the testimonies of absent, anonymous and vulnerable witnesses. Article 7 prohibits the retroactive criminalisation of acts and omissions. No person may be punished for an act that was not

1029-787: The 1791 U.S. Bill of Rights , the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen , or the first part of the German Basic Law . Statements of principle are, from a juridical point of view, not determinative and require and have given occasion to extensive interpretation by courts to bring out meaning in particular factual situations, As amended by Protocol 11, the convention consists of three parts. The main rights and freedoms are contained in Section I, which consists of Articles 2 to 18. Section II (Articles 19 to 51) sets up

SECTION 20

#1732780807148

1078-537: The ECHR," Kamenik commented for Euractiv . "Everyone means everyone, and the state should assure the possibility to cast a secret ballot to everyone." Drupis is active in a Council of Europe procedure of execution of the judgment Produkcija Plus v. Slovenia, in which the European Court of Human Rights found that lack of public hearings in some Slovenian courts violates rights of the petitioners. Drupis sent its proposals co-signed by six university professors of

1127-639: The Republic of Slovenia ( Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ) is, according to Article 127 of the Constitution , the highest court in Slovenia . Its seat is in Ljubljana . The court's current president is Damijan Florjančič. Decisions of the Supreme Court can be reviewed by the Constitutional Court if human rights, guaranteed by the constitution or by the European Convention on Human Rights are violated. The supreme court judges enjoy

1176-576: The appeal lodged by the Association and a voter. Slovenian Disability Rights Association has filed an Amicus Curiae brief in Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia case at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The cases aimed at a ruling which would require all polling places in Europe be accessible. In the Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia judgment, issued October 2021, the Court ruled that Slovenia had violated two wheelchair users' right to an effective legal remedy in

1225-425: The article contains an exception for lawful executions , although this exception has largely been superseded by Protocols 6 and 13. Protocol 6 prohibits the imposition of the death penalty in peacetime, while Protocol 13 extends the prohibition to all circumstances. (For more on Protocols 6 and 13, see below ). The second paragraph of Article 2 provides that death resulting from defending oneself or others, arresting

1274-410: The articles in Section I are structured in two paragraphs: the first sets out a basic right or freedom (such as Article 2(1) – the right to life) but the second contains various exclusions, exceptions or limitations on the basic right (such as Article 2(2) – which excepts certain uses of force leading to death). Article 1 simply binds the signatory parties to secure the rights under the other articles of

1323-534: The chair of the Assembly's Committee on Legal and Administrative Questions, was one of its leading members and guided the drafting of the convention, based on an earlier draft produced by the European Movement . As a prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials , he had seen first-hand of a binding international court. French former minister and French Resistance fighter Pierre-Henri Teitgen submitted

1372-414: The convention "within their jurisdiction". In exceptional cases, "jurisdiction" may not be confined to a contracting state's own national territory; the obligation to secure convention rights then also extends to foreign territories, such as occupied land in which the state exercises effective control. In Loizidou v Turkey , the European Court of Human Rights ruled that jurisdiction of member states to

1421-417: The convention entered into force on 3 September 1953. All Council of Europe member states are party to the convention and new members are expected to ratify the convention at the earliest opportunity. The convention established the European Court of Human Rights (generally referred to by the initials ECtHR). Any person who feels their rights have been violated under the convention by a state party can take

1470-406: The convention extended to areas under that state's effective control as a result of military action. Article 2 protects the right of every person to their life. The right to life extends only to human beings, not to animals, nor to "legal persons" such as corporations. In Evans v United Kingdom , the court ruled that the question of whether the right to life extends to a human embryo fell within

1519-432: The convention have been put forward, for example by former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak , and other UK politicians. Conservative politicians have proposed reform or withdrawal from the convention during the 2024 Conservative Party leadership election . The convention is drafted in broad terms, in a similar (albeit more modern) manner to the 1689 Scottish Claim of Right Act 1689 , to the 1689 English Bill of Rights ,

Slovenian Disability Rights Association - Misplaced Pages Continue

1568-809: The convention itself. Consequently, the convention was principally conceived, at the time of its creation, as an "anti-totalitarian" measure to help stabilise social democracies in Western Europe, rather than as a specific reaction to the legacy of Nazism and the Holocaust. This approach was a continuation of Atlanticist beliefs from World War II and the early Cold War which called for the defence of democracy against all forms of authoritarianism. From 7 to 10 May 1948, politicians including Winston Churchill , François Mitterrand , and Konrad Adenauer , as well as civil society representatives, academics, business leaders, trade unionists, and religious leaders convened

1617-521: The convention was a response to the growth of Stalinism in Central and Eastern Europe and was designed to protect the member states of the Council of Europe from communist subversion. This, in part, explains the constant references to values and principles that are " necessary in a democratic society " throughout the convention, despite the fact that such principles are not in any way defined within

1666-421: The court and its rules of operation. Section III contains various concluding provisions. Before the entry into force of Protocol 11, Section II (Article 19) set up the commission and the court, Sections III (Articles 20 to 37) and IV (Articles 38 to 59) included the high-level machinery for the operation of, respectively, the commission and the court, and Section V contained various concluding provisions. Many of

1715-579: The court finds today are excessive delays, in violation of the "reasonable time" requirement, in civil and criminal proceedings before national courts, mostly in Italy and France . Under the "independent tribunal" requirement, the court has ruled that military judges in Turkish state security courts are incompatible with Article 6. In compliance with this Article, Turkey has now adopted a law abolishing these courts. Another significant set of violations concerns

1764-468: The court found Turkey guilty of torture in 1996 in the case of a detainee who was suspended by his arms while his hands were tied behind his back. Selmouni v. France (2000) the court has appeared to be more open to finding states guilty of torture ruling that since the convention is a "living instrument", treatment which it had previously characterized as inhuman or degrading treatment might in future be regarded as torture. In 2014, after new information

1813-543: The court ruled that the five techniques developed by the United Kingdom ( wall-standing , hooding , subjection to noise , deprivation of sleep , and deprivation of food and drink ), as used against fourteen detainees in Northern Ireland by the United Kingdom were "inhuman and degrading" and breached the European Convention on Human Rights, but did not amount to "torture". In Aksoy v. Turkey (1997)

1862-408: The criminal act was committed. Article 7 incorporates the legal principle nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege (no crime, no penalty without law) into the convention. Relevant cases are: Article 8 provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence ", subject to restrictions that are "in accordance with law and is necessary in a democratic society in

1911-492: The exception contained in the second paragraph does not constitute situations when it is permitted to kill, but situations where it is permitted to use force which might result in the deprivation of life. Article 3 prohibits torture and "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment". There are no exceptions or limitations on this right. This provision usually applies, apart from torture, to cases of severe police violence and poor conditions in detention. The court has emphasised

1960-519: The fundamental nature of Article 3 in holding that the prohibition is made in "absolute terms ... irrespective of the victim's conduct". The court has also held that states cannot deport or extradite individuals who might be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in the recipient state. The first case to examine Article 3 was the Greek case , which set an influential precedent. In Ireland v. United Kingdom (1979–1980)

2009-402: The interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others". This article clearly provides a right to be free of unlawful searches, but the court has given the protection for "private and family life" that this article provides

Slovenian Disability Rights Association - Misplaced Pages Continue

2058-507: The new legislation was still not in line with the convention. In 2020, the Constitutional Court rejected most of the applicants' claims and ruled that abandonment of assistive technology and voting machines was in line with the constitution. In months preceding the European Parliament elections of 2019 , the Association argued in favor of voting rights of persons with intellectual disabilities . The Constitutional Court rejected

2107-424: The person are taken as a "compound" concept – security of the person has not been subject to separate interpretation by the court. Article 5 provides the right to liberty , subject only to lawful arrest or detention under certain other circumstances, such as arrest on reasonable suspicion of a crime or imprisonment in fulfilment of a sentence. The article also provides those arrested with the right to be informed, in

2156-523: The protection of rights. The convention was opened for signature on 4 November 1950 in Rome. It was ratified and entered into force on 3 September 1953. It is overseen and enforced by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, and the Council of Europe . Until procedural reforms in the late 1990s, the convention was also overseen by a European Commission on Human Rights . Proposals for reform of

2205-496: The right to freedom of expression , subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society". This right includes the freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas, but allows restrictions for: Relevant cases are: Article 11 protects the right to freedom of assembly and association, including the right to form trade unions , subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in

2254-445: The right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within reasonable time, the presumption of innocence , and other minimum rights for those charged with a criminal offence (adequate time and facilities to prepare their defence, access to legal representation, right to examine witnesses against them or have them examined, right to the free assistance of an interpreter). The majority of convention violations that

2303-443: Was designed to incorporate a traditional civil liberties approach to securing "effective political democracy", from the strongest traditions in the United Kingdom, France and other member states of the fledgling Council of Europe, as said by Guido Raimondi , President of the European Court of Human Rights : The European system of protection of human rights with its Court would be inconceivable untied from democracy. In fact, we have

2352-404: Was drafted by the Council of Europe after the Second World War and Hague Congress. Over 100 parliamentarians from the twelve member states of the Council of Europe gathered in Strasbourg in the summer of 1949 for the first-ever meeting of the council's Consultative Assembly to draft a "charter of human rights" and to establish a court to enforce it. British MP and lawyer Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe ,

2401-533: Was uncovered that showed the decision to use the five techniques in Northern Ireland in 1971–1972 had been taken by British ministers, the Irish Government asked the European Court of Human Rights to review its judgement. In 2018, by six votes to one, the court declined. Article 4 prohibits slavery , servitude and forced labour but exempts labour: Article 5 provides that everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. Liberty and security of

#147852