Misplaced Pages

#791208

46-511: In popular usage, a phenomenon often refers to an extraordinary, unusual or notable event. According to the Dictionary of Visual Discourse : In ordinary language 'phenomenon/phenomena' refer to any occurrence worthy of note and investigation, typically an untoward or unusual event, person or fact that is of special significance or otherwise notable. In modern philosophical use, the term phenomena means things as they are experienced through

92-402: A concept to describe or categorize noumena (the objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis of the workings of the world), one is also employing a way of describing or categorizing phenomena (the observable manifestations of those objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis). Kant posited methods by which human understanding makes sense of and thus intuits phenomena that appear to the mind:

138-477: A mind. Schopenhauer claimed that Kant used the word noumenon incorrectly. He explained in his " Critique of the Kantian philosophy ", which first appeared as an appendix to The World as Will and Representation : The difference between abstract and intuitive cognition, which Kant entirely overlooks, was the very one that ancient philosophers indicated as φαινόμενα [ phainomena ] and νοούμενα [ nooumena ];

184-426: A position at least to think them as things in themselves; otherwise we should be landed in the absurd conclusion that there can be appearance without anything that appears. He is much more doubtful about noumena: But in that case a noumenon is not for our understanding a special [kind of] object, namely, an intelligible object; the [sort of] understanding to which it might belong is itself a problem. For we cannot in

230-433: A thing so far as it is not an object of our sensible intuition, and so abstract from our mode of intuiting it, this is a noumenon in the negative sense of the term. But if we understand by it an object of a non-sensible intuition, we thereby presuppose a special mode of intuition, namely, the intellectual, which is not that which we possess, and of which we cannot comprehend even the possibility. This would be 'noumenon' in

276-514: A type of intuition, intellectual intuition, forms no part whatsoever of our faculty of knowledge, it follows that the employment of the categories can never extend further than to the objects of experience. Doubtless, indeed, there are intelligible entities corresponding to the sensible entities; there may also be intelligible entities to which our sensible faculty of intuition has no relation whatsoever; but our concepts of understanding, being mere forms of thought for our sensible intuition, could not in

322-444: Is a physical phenomenon associated with the equilibrium or motion of objects. Some examples are Newton's cradle , engines , and double pendulums . Group phenomena concern the behavior of a particular group of individual entities, usually organisms and most especially people. The behavior of individuals often changes in a group setting in various ways, and a group may have its own behaviors not possible for an individual because of

368-450: Is an entity distinct from the phenomena to which it gives rise. The other is the dual aspect view, according to which the thing-in-itself and the thing-as-it-appears are two "sides" of the same thing. This view is supported by the textual fact that "Most occurrences of the phrase 'things-in-themselves' are shorthand for the phrase, 'things considered in themselves' (Dinge an sich selbst betrachtet)." Although we cannot see things apart from

414-411: Is knowledge posited as an object that exists independently of human sense . The term noumenon is generally used in contrast with, or in relation to, the term phenomenon , which refers to any object of the senses. Immanuel Kant first developed the notion of the noumenon as part of his transcendental idealism , suggesting that while we know the noumenal world to exist because human sensibility

460-524: Is merely receptive, it is not itself sensible and must therefore remain otherwise unknowable to us. In Kantian philosophy , the noumenon is often associated with the unknowable " thing-in-itself " ( German : Ding an sich ). However, the nature of the relationship between the two is not made explicit in Kant's work, and remains a subject of debate among Kant scholars as a result. The Greek word νοούμενoν , nooúmenon (plural νοούμενα , nooúmena )

506-486: Is metaphysically impossible. Qualities associated with matter, such as shape, color, smell, texture, weight, temperature, and sound are all dependent on minds, which allow only for relative perception, not absolute perception. The complete absence of such minds (and more importantly an omnipotent mind ) would render those same qualities unobservable and even unimaginable. Berkeley called this philosophy immaterialism . Essentially there could be no such thing as matter without

SECTION 10

#1732772791792

552-545: Is taken by Philipp Mainländer , who hailed Kant for breaking the rules of his own philosophy to proclaim the existence of a thing-in-itself. He did it, because he feared nothing more than the allegation, that his philosophy is pure idealism, which makes the whole objective world into illusion and takes away all reality from it. The three remarks of the first part of the Prolegomena are, with this in mind, very much worth reading. I cannot condemn this great inconsequence. It

598-481: Is the neuter middle-passive present participle of νοεῖν , noeîn , 'to think, to mean', which in turn originates from the word νοῦς , noûs , an Attic contracted form of νόος , nóos , 'perception, understanding, mind'. A rough equivalent in English would be "that which is thought", or "the object of an act of thought". The Indian Vedānta philosophy (specifically Advaita ),

644-462: The Moon's orbit and of gravity ; or Galileo Galilei 's observations of the motion of a pendulum . In natural sciences , a phenomenon is an observable happening or event. Often, this term is used without considering the causes of a particular event. Example of a physical phenomenon is an observable phenomenon of the lunar orbit or the phenomenon of oscillations of a pendulum. A mechanical phenomenon

690-477: The herd mentality . Social phenomena apply especially to organisms and people in that subjective states are implicit in the term. Attitudes and events particular to a group may have effects beyond the group, and either be adapted by the larger society, or seen as aberrant, being punished or shunned. Noumenon In philosophy , a noumenon ( / ˈ n uː m ə n ɒ n / , / ˈ n aʊ -/ ; from ‹See Tfd› Greek : νοούμενoν ; pl. : noumena )

736-481: The positive sense of the term. The positive noumena, if they existed, would be immaterial entities that can only be apprehended by a special, non-sensory faculty: "intellectual intuition" ( nicht sinnliche Anschauung ). Kant doubts that we have such a faculty, because for him intellectual intuition would mean that thinking of an entity, and its being represented, would be the same. He argues that humans have no way to apprehend positive noumena: Since, however, such

782-555: The thing-in-itself ( German : Ding an sich ) is the status of objects as they are, independent of representation and observation. The concept of the thing-in-itself was introduced by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant , and over the following centuries was met with controversy among later philosophers. It is closely related to Kant's concept of noumena or the objects of inquiry, as opposed to phenomena , its manifestations. In his doctrine of transcendental idealism , Kant argued

828-479: The "things-in-themselves", the actual objects and dynamics of the natural world in their noumenal dimension - this being the negative, correlate to phenomena and that which escapes the limits of human understanding. By Kant's Critique, our minds may attempt to correlate in useful ways, perhaps even closely accurate ways, with the structure and order of the various aspects of the universe, but cannot know these "things-in-themselves" (noumena) directly. Rather, we must infer

874-475: The History of Philosophy," §13: Kant was guided by the truth certainly felt that there lies behind every phenomenon a being-in-itself whence such phenomenon obtains its existence ... But he undertook to derive this from the given representation itself by the addition of its laws that are known to us a priori. Yet just because these are a priori , they cannot lead to something independent of, and different from,

920-525: The actual object itself. Thus, the term phenomenon refers to any incident deserving of inquiry and investigation, especially processes and events which are particularly unusual or of distinctive importance. In scientific usage, a phenomenon is any event that is observable , including the use of instrumentation to observe, record, or compile data. Especially in physics , the study of a phenomenon may be described as measurements related to matter , energy , or time , such as Isaac Newton 's observations of

966-518: The categories of the understanding as free from empirical contingency. According to Kant, objects of which we are cognizant via the physical senses are merely representations of unknown somethings —what Kant refers to as the transcendental object —as interpreted through the a priori or categories of the understanding . These unknown somethings are manifested within the noumenon—although we can never know how or why as our perceptions of these unknown somethings via our physical senses are bound by

SECTION 20

#1732772791792

1012-499: The concept of a noumenon is necessary, to prevent sensible intuition from being extended to things in themselves, and thus to limit the objective validity of sensible knowledge. What our understanding acquires through this concept of a noumenon, is a negative extension; that is to say, understanding is not limited through sensibility; on the contrary, it itself limits sensibility by applying the term noumena to things in themselves (things not regarded as appearances). But in so doing it at

1058-440: The concepts of the transcendental aesthetic , as well as that of the transcendental analytic , transcendental logic and transcendental deduction . Taken together, Kant's "categories of understanding" are the principles of the human mind which necessarily are brought to bear in attempting to understand the world in which we exist (that is, to understand, or attempt to understand, "things in themselves"). In each instance

1104-441: The extent to which the human rational faculties can reach the object of "things-in-themselves" by our observations of the manifestations of those things that can be perceived via the physical senses, that is, of phenomena, and by ordering these perceptions in the mind help infer the validity of our perceptions to the rational categories used to understand them in a rational system. This rational system ( transcendental analytic ), being

1150-431: The highest knowledge, truths, and values is Plato's principal legacy to philosophy." As expressed in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason , human understanding is structured by "concepts of the understanding" or pure categories of understanding , found prior to experience in the mind and which make outer experiences possible as counterpart to the rational faculties of the mind. By Kant's account, when one employs

1196-427: The issue for which the terms φαινομένα and νοούμενα were already in use, then took possession of the terms as if they were stray and ownerless, and used them as designations of things in themselves and their appearances. The noumenon's original meaning of "that which is thought" is not compatible with the " thing-in-itself ," the latter being Kant's term for things as they exist apart from their existence as images in

1242-482: The labors of Kant and Reinhold, philosophy is still not a science. Aenesidemus has shaken my own system to its very foundations, and, since one cannot live very well under the open sky, I have been forced to construct a new system. I am convinced that philosophy can become a science only if it is generated from one single principle, but that it must then become just as self-evident as geometry. The system which Fichte subsequently published, Science of Knowledge , scraps

1288-461: The latter claim makes sense: it seems to imply that we know at least one thing about the thing-in-itself (i.e., that it is unknowable). But Stephen Palmquist explains that this is part of Kant's definition of the term, to the extent that anyone who claims to have found a way of making the thing-in-itself knowable must be adopting a non-Kantian position. Kant also makes a distinction between positive and negative noumena: If by 'noumenon' we mean

1334-404: The least apply to them. That, therefore, which we entitle 'noumenon' must be understood as being such only in a negative sense. Even if noumena are unknowable, they are still needed as a limiting concept , Kant tells us. Without them, there would be only phenomena, and since potentially we have complete knowledge of our phenomena, we would in a sense know everything. In his own words: Further,

1380-415: The least represent to ourselves the possibility of an understanding which should know its object, not discursively through categories, but intuitively in a non-sensible intuition. A crucial difference between the noumenon and the thing-in-itself is that to call something a noumenon is to claim a kind of knowledge, whereas Kant insisted that the thing-in-itself is unknowable. Interpreters have debated whether

1426-402: The limitations of the categories of the understanding and we are therefore never able to fully know the "thing-in-itself". Many accounts of Kant's philosophy treat "noumenon" and "thing-in-itself" as synonymous, and there is textual evidence for this relationship. However, Stephen Palmquist holds that "noumenon" and "thing-in-itself" are only loosely synonymous, inasmuch as they represent

Phenomenon - Misplaced Pages Continue

1472-483: The mind of an observer. In a footnote to this passage, Schopenhauer provides the following passage from the Outlines of Pyrrhonism (Bk. I, ch. 13) of Sextus Empiricus to demonstrate the original distinction between phenomenon and noumenon according to ancient philosophers: νοούμενα φαινομένοις ἀντετίθη Ἀναξαγόρας ('Anaxagoras opposed what is thought to what appears.') Thing-in-itself In Kantian philosophy ,

1518-612: The opposition and incommensurability between these terms proved very productive in the philosophemes of the Eleatics , in Plato 's doctrine of Ideas , in the dialectic of the Megarics , and later in the scholastics , in the conflict between nominalism and realism . This latter conflict was the late development of a seed already present in the opposed tendencies of Plato and Aristotle . But Kant, who completely and irresponsibly neglected

1564-399: The phenomenal, Kant is able to make the claim that they cannot be known to a mind that works upon "such knowledge that has to do only with appearances". These questions are ultimately the "proper object of faith, but not of reason". Kantian scholars have long debated two contrasting interpretations of the thing-in-itself. One is the dual object view, according to which the thing-in-itself

1610-430: The phenomenon or representation; and so for this purpose we have to pursue an entirely different course. The inconsistencies in which Kant was involved through the faulty course taken by him in this respect were demonstrated to him by G. E. Schultze who in his ponderous and diffuse manner expounded the matter first anonymously in his Aenesidemus ... and then in his Kritik der theoretischen Philosophie. A unique position

1656-420: The project of Kant. According to Kant's teaching, things-in-themselves cannot cause appearances, since the category of causality can only find application to objects of experience. Kant, therefore, does not have the right to claim the existence of things-in-themselves. This contradiction was subsequently generally accepted as being the main problem of the thing-in-itself. The attack on the thing-in-itself, and

1702-462: The roots of which go back to the Vedic period , talks of the ātman (self) in similar terms as the noumenon. Regarding the equivalent concepts in Plato , Ted Honderich writes: " Platonic Ideas and Forms are noumena, and phenomena are things displaying themselves to the senses... This dichotomy is the most characteristic feature of Plato's dualism; that noumena and the noumenal world are objects of

1748-464: The same concept viewed from two different perspectives, and other scholars also argue that they are not identical. Schopenhauer criticised Kant for changing the meaning of "noumenon". However, this opinion is far from unanimous. Kant's writings show points of difference between noumena and things-in-themselves. For instance, he regards things-in-themselves as existing: ...though we cannot know these objects as things in themselves, we must yet be in

1794-612: The same time sets limits to itself, recognising that it cannot know these noumena through any of the categories, and that it must therefore think them only under the title of an unknown something. Furthermore, for Kant, the existence of a noumenal world limits reason to what he perceives to be its proper bounds, making many questions of traditional metaphysics, such as the existence of God, the soul, and free will unanswerable by reason. Kant derives this from his definition of knowledge as "the determination of given representations to an object". As there are no appearances of these entities in

1840-587: The senses and processed by the mind as distinct from things in and of themselves ( noumena ). In his inaugural dissertation , titled On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World , Immanuel Kant (1770) theorizes that the human mind is restricted to the logical world and thus can only interpret and understand occurrences according to their physical appearances. He wrote that humans could infer only as much as their senses allowed, but not experience

1886-476: The skeptical work in general, had a big impact on Fichte , and Schopenhauer called G. E. Schulze , who was revealed to be the author, “the acutest" of Kant's opponents. Initially Fichte embraced Kantian philosophy , including a thing-in-itself, but the work of Schulze made him revise his position. Aenesidemus, which I consider one of the most remarkable products of our decade, has convinced me of something which I admittedly already suspected: that even after

Phenomenon - Misplaced Pages Continue

1932-409: The sum of all objects, the empirical world, is a complex of appearances whose existence and connection occur only in our representations. Kant introduces the thing-in-itself as follows: And we indeed, rightly considering objects of sense as mere appearances, confess thereby that they are based upon a thing in itself, though we know not this thing as it is in itself, but only know its appearances, viz.,

1978-559: The thing-in-itself. In his " Critique of the Kantian Philosophy " appended to The World as Will and Representation (1818), Arthur Schopenhauer agreed with the critics that the manner in which Kant had introduced the thing-in-itself was inadmissible, but he considered that Kant was right to assert its existence and praised the distinction between thing-in-itself and appearance as Kant's greatest merit. As he wrote in volume 1 of his Parerga and Paralipomena , "Fragments of

2024-427: The way in which our senses are affected by this unknown something. The first to criticize the concept of a thing-in-itself was F. H. Jacobi , with the expression: I could not enter into the system without the assumption of the concept of the thing-in-itself and, on the other hand, I could not remain in it with this concept. The anonymously published work Aenesidemus was one of the most successful attacks against

2070-537: The way we do in fact perceive them via the physical senses, we can think them apart from our mode of sensibility (physical perception); thus making the thing-in-itself a kind of noumenon or object of thought. Though the term noumenon did not come into common usage until Kant, the idea that undergirds it, that matter has an absolute existence which causes it to emanate certain phenomena, had historically been subjected to criticism. George Berkeley , who pre-dated Kant, asserted that matter, independent of an observant mind,

2116-405: The word "transcendental" refers to the process that the human mind must exercise to understand or grasp the form of, and order among, phenomena. Kant asserts that to "transcend" a direct observation or experience is to use reason and classifications to strive to correlate with the phenomena that are observed. Humans can make sense out of phenomena in these various ways, but in doing so can never know

#791208