Misplaced Pages

#894105

54-449: Reaction control systems are capable of providing small amounts of thrust in any desired direction or combination of directions. An RCS is also capable of providing torque to allow control of rotation ( roll, pitch, and yaw ). Reaction control systems often use combinations of large and small ( vernier ) thrusters, to allow different levels of response. Spacecraft reaction control systems are used for: Because spacecraft only contain

108-510: A jet engine , or by ejecting hot gases from a rocket engine . Reverse thrust can be generated to aid braking after landing by reversing the pitch of variable-pitch propeller blades, or using a thrust reverser on a jet engine. Rotary wing aircraft use rotors and thrust vectoring V/STOL aircraft use propellers or engine thrust to support the weight of the aircraft and to provide forward propulsion. A motorboat propeller generates thrust when it rotates and forces water backwards. A rocket

162-492: A tungsten screen, and the Gemini thrusters used hypergolic mono-methyl hydrazine fuel oxidized with nitrogen tetroxide . The Gemini spacecraft was also equipped with a hypergolic Orbit Attitude and Maneuvering System , which made it the first crewed spacecraft with translation as well as rotation capability. In-orbit attitude control was achieved by firing pairs of eight 25-pound-force (110 N) thrusters located around

216-460: A change in the aerodynamic force on the horizontal stabiliser. Notably, the Boeing 737 MAX , with larger, lower-slung engines than previous 737 models, had a greater distance between the thrust axis and the drag axis, causing the nose to rise up in some flight regimes, necessitating a pitch-control system, MCAS . Early versions of MCAS malfunctioned in flight with catastrophic consequences, leading to

270-439: A constant speed, then distance divided by time is just speed, so power is thrust times speed: This formula looks very surprising, but it is correct: the propulsive power (or power available ) of a jet engine increases with its speed. If the speed is zero, then the propulsive power is zero. If a jet aircraft is at full throttle but attached to a static test stand, then the jet engine produces no propulsive power, however thrust

324-595: A convention for locations for thrusters on winged vehicles not intended to dock in space; that is, those that only have attitude control thrusters. Those for pitch and yaw are located in the nose, forward of the cockpit, and replace a standard radar system. Those for roll are located at the wingtips. The X-20 , which would have gone into orbit, continued this pattern. Unlike these, the Space Shuttle Orbiter had many more thrusters, which were required to control vehicle attitude in both orbital flight and during

378-512: A finite amount of fuel and there is little chance to refill them, alternative reaction control systems have been developed so that fuel can be conserved. For stationkeeping, some spacecraft (particularly those in geosynchronous orbit ) use high- specific impulse engines such as arcjets , ion thrusters , or Hall effect thrusters . To control orientation, a few spacecraft, including the ISS , use momentum wheels which spin to control rotational rates on

432-529: A lack of a clear goal for the project. Many different boosters were proposed to launch Dyna-Soar into orbit. The original USAF proposal suggested LOX /JP-4, fluorine-ammonia, fluorine-hydrazine, or RMI (X-15) engines, but Boeing, the principal contractor, favored an Atlas - Centaur combination. Eventually, in November 1959, the Air Force stipulated a Titan , as suggested by failed competitor Martin, but

486-552: A more conventional tail. The framework of the craft was to be made from the René 41 super alloy, as were the upper surface panels. The bottom surface was to be made from molybdenum sheets placed over insulated René 41, while the nose-cone was to be made from graphite with zirconia rods. Due to changing requirements, several versions of the Dyna-Soar were considered, all sharing the same basic shape and layout. A single pilot sat at

540-566: A new ballistic trajectory, exiting the atmosphere again and giving the vehicle time to cool off between the skips. After the war, it was demonstrated that the heating load during the skips was much higher than initially calculated and would have melted the spacecraft. Following the war, many German scientists were taken to the United States by the Office of Strategic Services 's Operation Paperclip , bringing with them detailed knowledge of

594-478: A rocket stage. The rocket booster would place the vehicle onto a suborbital , but exoatmospheric , trajectory, resulting in a brief spaceflight followed by re-entry into the atmosphere . Instead of a full re-entry and landing, the vehicle would use the lift from its wings to redirect its glide angle upward, trading horizontal velocity for vertical velocity. In this way, the vehicle would be "bounced" back into space again. This skip-glide method would repeat until

SECTION 10

#1732772446895

648-460: A set of sixteen R-4D hypergolic thrusters, grouped into external clusters of four, to provide both translation and attitude control. The clusters were located near the craft's average centers of mass, and were fired in pairs in opposite directions for attitude control. A pair of translation thrusters are located at the rear of the Soyuz spacecraft; the counter-acting thrusters are similarly paired in

702-506: A thrust of 569 kN (127,900 lbf) until it was surpassed by the GE9X , fitted on the upcoming Boeing 777X , at 609 kN (134,300 lbf). The power needed to generate thrust and the force of the thrust can be related in a non-linear way. In general, P 2 ∝ T 3 {\displaystyle \mathbf {P} ^{2}\propto \mathbf {T} ^{3}} . The proportionality constant varies, and can be solved for

756-462: A uniform flow, where v ∞ {\displaystyle v_{\infty }} is the incoming air velocity, v d {\displaystyle v_{d}} is the velocity at the actuator disc, and v f {\displaystyle v_{f}} is the final exit velocity: Solving for the velocity at the disc, v d {\displaystyle v_{d}} , we then have: When incoming air

810-508: A unique ability for a spacecraft, as the laws of celestial mechanics ordinarily mean a change of plane requires an enormous expenditure of energy. The Dyna-Soar was projected to be able to use this capability to rendezvous with satellites even if the target conducted evasive maneuvers. Unlike the later Space Shuttle, Dyna-Soar did not have wheels on its tricycle undercarriage , as rubber tires would have caught fire during re-entry. Instead Goodyear developed retractable wire-brush skids made of

864-408: Is accelerated from a standstill – for example when hovering – then v ∞ = 0 {\displaystyle v_{\infty }=0} , and we can find: From here we can see the P 2 ∝ T 3 {\displaystyle \mathbf {P} ^{2}\propto \mathbf {T} ^{3}} relationship, finding: The inverse of the proportionality constant,

918-417: Is determined as the vector difference between the thrust vector and the drag vector. The thrust axis for an airplane is the line of action of the total thrust at any instant. It depends on the location, number, and characteristics of the jet engines or propellers. It usually differs from the drag axis. If so, the distance between the thrust axis and the drag axis will cause a moment that must be resisted by

972-415: Is how to compare the thrust rating of a jet engine with the power rating of a piston engine. Such comparison is difficult, as these quantities are not equivalent. A piston engine does not move the aircraft by itself (the propeller does that), so piston engines are usually rated by how much power they deliver to the propeller. Except for changes in temperature and air pressure, this quantity depends basically on

1026-505: Is propelled forward by a thrust equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction, to the time-rate of momentum change of the exhaust gas accelerated from the combustion chamber through the rocket engine nozzle. This is the exhaust velocity with respect to the rocket, times the time-rate at which the mass is expelled, or in mathematical terms: Where T is the thrust generated (force), d m d t {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} m}{\mathrm {d} t}}}

1080-483: Is still produced. The combination piston engine –propeller also has a propulsive power with exactly the same formula, and it will also be zero at zero speed – but that is for the engine–propeller set. The engine alone will continue to produce its rated power at a constant rate, whether the aircraft is moving or not. Now, imagine the strong chain is broken, and the jet and the piston aircraft start to move. At low speeds: The piston engine will have constant 100% power, and

1134-609: Is the rate of change of mass with respect to time (mass flow rate of exhaust), and v is the velocity of the exhaust gases measured relative to the rocket. For vertical launch of a rocket the initial thrust at liftoff must be more than the weight. Each of the three Space Shuttle Main Engines could produce a thrust of 1.8  meganewton , and each of the Space Shuttle's two Solid Rocket Boosters 14.7  MN (3,300,000  lbf ), together 29.4 MN. By contrast,

SECTION 20

#1732772446895

1188-449: The OMS pods mounted in the tail/afterbody. The International Space Station uses electrically powered control moment gyroscopes (CMG) for primary attitude control, with RCS thruster systems as backup and augmentation systems. Thrust Thrust is a reaction force described quantitatively by Newton's third law . When a system expels or accelerates mass in one direction,

1242-599: The Simplified Aid for EVA Rescue (SAFER) has 24 thrusters of 3.56 N (0.80 lbf) each. In the air-breathing category, the AMT-USA AT-180 jet engine developed for radio-controlled aircraft produce 90 N (20 lbf ) of thrust. The GE90 -115B engine fitted on the Boeing 777 -300ER, recognized by the Guinness Book of World Records as the "World's Most Powerful Commercial Jet Engine," has

1296-482: The USAF Air Research and Development Command (ARDC) consolidated Hywards, Brass Bell, and Robo studies into the Dyna-Soar project, or Weapons System 464L, with a three-step abbreviated development plan. The proposal drew together the existing boost-glide proposals into a single vehicle designed to carry out all the bombing and reconnaissance tasks examined by the earlier studies, and would act as successor to

1350-454: The X-15 research program. The three stages of the Dyna-Soar program were to be a research vehicle ( Dyna-Soar I ), a reconnaissance vehicle ( Dyna-Soar II , previously Brass Bell), and a vehicle that added strategic bombing capability ( Dyna-Soar III , previously Robo). The first glide tests for Dyna-Soar I were expected to be carried out in 1963, followed by powered flights, reaching Mach 18,

1404-541: The deaths of over 300 people in 2018 and 2019. Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar The Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar ("Dynamic Soarer") was a United States Air Force (USAF) program to develop a spaceplane that could be used for a variety of military missions, including aerial reconnaissance , bombing , space rescue, satellite maintenance, and as a space interceptor to sabotage enemy satellites. The program ran from October 24, 1957, to December 10, 1963, cost US$ 660 million ($ 6.57 billion in current dollars ), and

1458-414: The "efficiency" of an otherwise-perfect thruster, is proportional to the area of the cross section of the propelled volume of fluid ( A {\displaystyle A} ) and the density of the fluid ( ρ {\displaystyle \rho } ). This helps to explain why moving through water is easier and why aircraft have much larger propellers than watercraft. A very common question

1512-460: The Silbervogel project. Among them, Walter Dornberger and Krafft Ehricke moved to Bell Aircraft , where, in 1952, they proposed what was essentially a vertical launch version of Silbervogel known as the "Bomber Missile", or "BoMi". These studies all proposed various rocket-powered vehicles that could travel vast distances by gliding after being boosted to high speed and altitude by

1566-700: The Titan I was not powerful enough to launch the five-ton X-20 into orbit. The Titan II and Titan III boosters could launch Dyna-Soar into Earth orbit, as could the Saturn C-1 (later renamed the Saturn I ), and all were proposed with various upper-stage and booster combinations. In December 1961, the Titan IIIC was chosen, ) but the vacillations over the launch system delayed the project and complicated planning. The original intention for Dyna-Soar, outlined in

1620-623: The Weapons System 464L proposal, called for a project combining aeronautical research with weapons system development. Many questioned whether the USAF should have a crewed space program, when that was the primary domain of NASA. It was frequently emphasized by the Air Force that, unlike the NASA programs, Dyna-Soar allowed for controlled re-entry, and this was where the main effort in the X-20 program

1674-642: The X-20 was developed in Germany during World War II by Eugen Sänger and Irene Bredt as part of the 1941 Silbervogel proposal. This was a design for a rocket-powered bomber able to attack New York City from bases in Germany and then fly on for landing somewhere in the Pacific Ocean held by the Empire of Japan . The idea would be to use the vehicle's wings to generate lift and pull up into

Reaction control system - Misplaced Pages Continue

1728-473: The accelerated mass will cause a force of equal magnitude but opposite direction to be applied to that system. The force applied on a surface in a direction perpendicular or normal to the surface is also called thrust. Force, and thus thrust, is measured using the International System of Units (SI) in newtons (symbol: N), and represents the amount needed to accelerate 1 kilogram of mass at

1782-478: The aft end of the adapter module provided forward thrust, which could be used to change the craft's orbit. The Gemini reentry module also had a separate Reentry Control System of sixteen thrusters located at the base of its nose, to provide rotational control during reentry. The Apollo Command Module had a set of twelve hypergolic thrusters for attitude control, and directional reentry control similar to Gemini. The Apollo Service Module and Lunar Module each had

1836-519: The atmosphere an opaque heat shield made from a refractory metal would protect the window at the front of the craft. This heat shield would then be jettisoned after aerobraking so the pilot could see, and safely land. A drawing in the Space/Aeronautics magazine from before the project's cancellation depicts the craft skimming the atmosphere for an orbital inclination change . It would then fire its rocket to resume orbit. This would be

1890-691: The booster (to be used in the Dyna Soar I drop-tests) successfully fired, and the USAF had held an unveiling ceremony for the X-20 in Las Vegas . The Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company (later the Honeywell Corporation ) completed flight tests on an inertial guidance sub-system for the X-20 project at Eglin Air Force Base , Florida, utilizing an NF-101B Voodoo by August 1963. Boeing B-52C-40-BO Stratofortress 53-0399

1944-426: The circumference of its adapter module at the extreme aft end. Lateral translation control was provided by four 100-pound-force (440 N) thrusters around the circumference at the forward end of the adaptor module (close to the spacecraft's center of mass). Two forward-pointing 85-pound-force (380 N) thrusters at the same location, provided aft translation, and two 100-pound-force (440 N) thrusters located in

1998-462: The control of a pilot, and could land at an airfield. Dyna-Soar could also reach Earth orbit, like conventional, crewed space capsules. These characteristics made Dyna-Soar a far more advanced concept than other human spaceflight missions of the period. Research into a spaceplane was realized much later in other reusable spacecraft such as the 1981–2011 Space Shuttle and the more recent Boeing X-40 and X-37B spacecraft. The concept underlying

2052-477: The early part of atmospheric entry, as well as carry out rendezvous and docking maneuvers in orbit. Shuttle thrusters were grouped in the nose of the vehicle and on each of the two aft Orbital Maneuvering System pods. No nozzles interrupted the heat shield on the underside of the craft; instead, the nose RCS nozzles which control positive pitch were mounted on the side of the vehicle, and were canted downward. The downward-facing negative pitch thrusters were located in

2106-406: The following year. A robotic glide missile was to be deployed in 1968, with the fully operational weapons system (Dyna-Soar III) expected by 1974. In March 1958, nine U.S. aerospace companies tendered for the Dyna-Soar contract. Of these, the field was narrowed to proposals from Bell and Boeing. Even though Bell had the advantage of six years' worth of design studies, the contract for the spaceplane

2160-552: The front, with an equipment bay situated behind. This bay contained data-collection equipment, weapons, reconnaissance equipment, or a four-person mid-deck in the case of the X-20X shuttle space vehicle . A Martin Marietta Transtage upper stage attached to the aft end of the craft would allow orbital maneuvers and a launch abort capability before being jettisoned before descent into the atmosphere. While falling through

2214-515: The middle of the spacecraft (near the center of mass) pointing outwards and forward. These act in pairs to prevent the spacecraft from rotating. The thrusters for the lateral directions are mounted close to the center of mass of the spacecraft, in pairs as well. The suborbital X-15 and a companion training aero-spacecraft, the NF-104 AST , both intended to travel to an altitude that rendered their aerodynamic control surfaces unusable, established

Reaction control system - Misplaced Pages Continue

2268-556: The much larger Space Shuttle . The final design also used delta wings for controlled landings. The later, and much smaller Soviet BOR-4 was closer in design philosophy to the Dyna-Soar, while NASA's Martin X-23 PRIME and Martin Marietta X-24A / HL-10 research aircraft also explored aspects of sub-orbital and space flight. The ESA 's proposed Hermes crewed spacecraft was superficially similar to but not derived from

2322-410: The propeller's thrust will vary with speed The jet engine will have constant 100% thrust, and the engine's power will vary with speed If a powered aircraft is generating thrust T and experiencing drag D, the difference between the two, T − D, is termed the excess thrust. The instantaneous performance of the aircraft is mostly dependent on the excess thrust. Excess thrust is a vector and

2376-412: The rate of 1 meter per second per second . In mechanical engineering , force orthogonal to the main load (such as in parallel helical gears ) is referred to as static thrust . A fixed-wing aircraft propulsion system generates forward thrust when air is pushed in the direction opposite to flight. This can be done by different means such as the spinning blades of a propeller , the propelling jet of

2430-402: The same René 41 alloy as the airframe. In April 1960, seven astronauts were secretly chosen for the Dyna-Soar program: Neil Armstrong and Bill Dana left the program in mid-1962. On September 19, 1962, Albert Crews was added to the Dyna-Soar program and the names of the six remaining Dyna-Soar astronauts were announced to the public. By the end of 1962, Dyna-Soar had been designated X-20,

2484-520: The speed was low enough that the pilot of the vehicle would need to pick a landing spot and glide the vehicle to a landing. This use of hypersonic atmospheric lift meant that the vehicle could greatly extend its range over a ballistic trajectory using the same rocket booster. There was enough interest in BoMi that by 1956 it had evolved into three separate programs: Days after the launch of Sputnik 1 on 4 October 1957, on either October 10 or October 24,

2538-412: The throttle setting. A jet engine has no propeller, so the propulsive power of a jet engine is determined from its thrust as follows. Power is the force (F) it takes to move something over some distance (d) divided by the time (t) it takes to move that distance: In case of a rocket or a jet aircraft, the force is exactly the thrust (T) produced by the engine. If the rocket or aircraft is moving at about

2592-469: The vehicle. The Mercury space capsule and Gemini reentry module both used groupings of nozzles to provide attitude control . The thrusters were located off their center of mass , thus providing a torque to rotate the capsule. The Gemini capsule was also capable of adjusting its reentry course by rolling, which directed its off-center lifting force. The Mercury thrusters used a hydrogen peroxide monopropellant which turned to steam when forced through

2646-453: Was assigned to the program for air-dropping the X-20, similar to the X-15 launch profile. When the X-20 was cancelled, it was used for other air-drop tests including that of the B-1A escape capsule. Besides the funding issues that often accompany research efforts, the Dyna-Soar program suffered from two major problems: uncertainty over the booster to be used to send the craft into orbit, and

2700-657: Was awarded to Boeing in June 1959 (by which time their original design had changed markedly and now closely resembled what Bell had submitted). In late 1961, the Titan III was chosen as the launch vehicle. The Dyna-Soar was to be launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station , Florida. The overall design of the X-20 Dyna-Soar was outlined in March 1960. It had a low-wing delta shape, with winglets for control rather than

2754-490: Was canceled, the U.S. Air Force announced another program, the Manned Orbiting Laboratory , a spin-off of Gemini. This program was also eventually canceled. Another black program, ISINGLASS , which was to be air-launched from a B-52 bomber, was evaluated and some engine work done, but was eventually cancelled as well. Despite cancellation of the X-20, the affiliated research on spaceplanes influenced

SECTION 50

#1732772446895

2808-421: Was cancelled just after spacecraft construction had begun. Other spacecraft under development at the time, such as Mercury or Vostok , were space capsules with ballistic re-entry profiles that ended in a landing under a parachute. Dyna-Soar was more like an aircraft. It could travel to distant targets at the speed of an intercontinental ballistic missile , was designed to glide to Earth like an aircraft under

2862-518: Was placed. On January 19, 1963, the Secretary of Defense , Robert McNamara , directed the U.S. Air Force to undertake a study to determine whether Gemini or Dyna-Soar was the more feasible approach to a space-based weapon system. In the middle of March 1963, after receiving the study, Secretary McNamara "stated that the Air Force had been placing too much emphasis on controlled re-entry when it did not have any real objectives for orbital flight". This

2916-462: Was seen as a reversal of the Secretary's earlier position on the Dyna-Soar program. Dyna-Soar was also an expensive program that would not launch a crewed mission until the mid-1960s at the earliest. This high cost and questionable utility made it difficult for the U.S. Air Force to justify the program. Eventually, the X-20 Dyna-Soar program was canceled on December 10, 1963. On the day that X-20

#894105