Misplaced Pages

Number (disambiguation)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Ring homomorphisms

#179820

85-430: A number describes quantity and assesses multitude. Number and numbers may also refer to: Number A number is a mathematical object used to count, measure, and label. The most basic examples are the natural numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and so forth. Numbers can be represented in language with number words. More universally, individual numbers can be represented by symbols, called numerals ; for example, "5"

170-410: A = a a for all m , n ≥ 0 . A left zero divisor of a ring R is an element a in the ring such that there exists a nonzero element b of R such that ab = 0 . A right zero divisor is defined similarly. A nilpotent element is an element a such that a = 0 for some n > 0 . One example of a nilpotent element is a nilpotent matrix . A nilpotent element in a nonzero ring

255-495: A 1 for a "ring". Starting in the 1960s, it became increasingly common to see books including the existence of 1 in the definition of "ring", especially in advanced books by notable authors such as Artin, Bourbaki, Eisenbud, and Lang. There are also books published as late as 2022 that use the term without the requirement for a 1 . Likewise, the Encyclopedia of Mathematics does not require unit elements in rings. In

340-524: A Sanskrit word Shunye or shunya to refer to the concept of void . In mathematics texts this word often refers to the number zero. In a similar vein, Pāṇini (5th century BC) used the null (zero) operator in the Ashtadhyayi , an early example of an algebraic grammar for the Sanskrit language (also see Pingala ). There are other uses of zero before Brahmagupta, though the documentation

425-500: A multiplicative inverse . In 1921, Emmy Noether gave a modern axiomatic definition of commutative rings (with and without 1) and developed the foundations of commutative ring theory in her paper Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen . Fraenkel's axioms for a "ring" included that of a multiplicative identity, whereas Noether's did not. Most or all books on algebra up to around 1960 followed Noether's convention of not requiring

510-525: A numeral is not clearly distinguished from the number that it represents. In mathematics, the notion of number has been extended over the centuries to include zero (0), negative numbers , rational numbers such as one half ( 1 2 ) {\displaystyle \left({\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)} , real numbers such as the square root of 2 ( 2 ) {\displaystyle \left({\sqrt {2}}\right)} and π , and complex numbers which extend

595-452: A ring is a set equipped with two binary operations satisfying properties analogous to those of addition and multiplication of integers . Ring elements may be numbers such as integers or complex numbers , but they may also be non-numerical objects such as polynomials , square matrices , functions , and power series . Formally, a ring is a set endowed with two binary operations called addition and multiplication such that

680-404: A , b positive and the other negative. The incorrect use of this identity, and the related identity in the case when both a and b are negative even bedeviled Euler . This difficulty eventually led him to the convention of using the special symbol i in place of − 1 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {-1}}} to guard against this mistake. The 18th century saw

765-603: A base 4, base 5 "finger" abacus. By 130 AD, Ptolemy , influenced by Hipparchus and the Babylonians, was using a symbol for 0 (a small circle with a long overbar) within a sexagesimal numeral system otherwise using alphabetic Greek numerals . Because it was used alone, not as just a placeholder, this Hellenistic zero was the first documented use of a true zero in the Old World. In later Byzantine manuscripts of his Syntaxis Mathematica ( Almagest ),

850-509: A few authors who use the term "ring" to refer to structures in which there is no requirement for multiplication to be associative. For these authors, every algebra is a "ring". The most familiar example of a ring is the set of all integers ⁠ Z , {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} ,} ⁠ consisting of the numbers The axioms of a ring were elaborated as a generalization of familiar properties of addition and multiplication of integers. Some basic properties of

935-421: A fixed set of lower powers, and thus the powers "cycle back". For instance, if a − 4 a + 1 = 0 then: and so on; in general, a is going to be an integral linear combination of 1 , a , and a . The first axiomatic definition of a ring was given by Adolf Fraenkel in 1915, but his axioms were stricter than those in the modern definition. For instance, he required every non-zero-divisor to have

SECTION 10

#1732780047180

1020-439: A given direction is postulated to converge to the corresponding ideal point. This is closely related to the idea of vanishing points in perspective drawing. The earliest fleeting reference to square roots of negative numbers occurred in the work of the mathematician and inventor Heron of Alexandria in the 1st century AD , when he considered the volume of an impossible frustum of a pyramid . They became more prominent when in

1105-503: A limited sense (for example, spy ring), so if that were the etymology then it would be similar to the way "group" entered mathematics by being a non-technical word for "collection of related things". According to Harvey Cohn, Hilbert used the term for a ring that had the property of "circling directly back" to an element of itself (in the sense of an equivalence ). Specifically, in a ring of algebraic integers, all high powers of an algebraic integer can be written as an integral combination of

1190-451: A notable expansion. The idea of the graphic representation of complex numbers had appeared, however, as early as 1685, in Wallis 's De algebra tractatus . In the same year, Gauss provided the first generally accepted proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra , showing that every polynomial over the complex numbers has a full set of solutions in that realm. Gauss studied complex numbers of

1275-451: A part from infinity or add a part to infinity, still what remains is infinity." Infinity was a popular topic of philosophical study among the Jain mathematicians c. 400 BC. They distinguished between five types of infinity: infinite in one and two directions, infinite in area, infinite everywhere, and infinite perpetually. The symbol ∞ {\displaystyle {\text{∞}}}

1360-503: A placeholder digit in representing another number as was done by the Babylonians or as a symbol for a lack of quantity as was done by Ptolemy and the Romans. The use of 0 as a number should be distinguished from its use as a placeholder numeral in place-value systems . Many ancient texts used 0. Babylonian and Egyptian texts used it. Egyptians used the word nfr to denote zero balance in double entry accounting . Indian texts used

1445-503: A research article, the authors often specify which definition of ring they use in the beginning of that article. Gardner and Wiegandt assert that, when dealing with several objects in the category of rings (as opposed to working with a fixed ring), if one requires all rings to have a 1 , then some consequences include the lack of existence of infinite direct sums of rings, and that proper direct summands of rings are not subrings. They conclude that "in many, maybe most, branches of ring theory

1530-425: A rigorous method of treating the ideas about infinite and infinitesimal numbers that had been used casually by mathematicians, scientists, and engineers ever since the invention of infinitesimal calculus by Newton and Leibniz . A modern geometrical version of infinity is given by projective geometry , which introduces "ideal points at infinity", one for each spatial direction. Each family of parallel lines in

1615-528: A ring follow immediately from the axioms: Equip the set Z / 4 Z = { 0 ¯ , 1 ¯ , 2 ¯ , 3 ¯ } {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} =\left\{{\overline {0}},{\overline {1}},{\overline {2}},{\overline {3}}\right\}} with the following operations: Then ⁠ Z / 4 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} } ⁠

1700-434: A ring is commutative has profound implications on its behavior. Commutative algebra , the theory of commutative rings , is a major branch of ring theory . Its development has been greatly influenced by problems and ideas of algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry . The simplest commutative rings are those that admit division by non-zero elements; such rings are called fields . Examples of commutative rings include

1785-405: A subring ⁠ Z / 2 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /2\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ , and if p {\displaystyle p} is prime, then ⁠ Z / p Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /p\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ has no subrings. The set of 2-by-2 square matrices with entries in a field F is With

SECTION 20

#1732780047180

1870-679: A system that used combinations of letters from the Roman alphabet, remained dominant in Europe until the spread of the superior Hindu–Arabic numeral system around the late 14th century, and the Hindu–Arabic numeral system remains the most common system for representing numbers in the world today. The key to the effectiveness of the system was the symbol for zero , which was developed by ancient Indian mathematicians around 500 AD. The first known documented use of zero dates to AD 628, and appeared in

1955-479: A way to swap true roots and false roots as well. At the same time, the Chinese were indicating negative numbers by drawing a diagonal stroke through the right-most non-zero digit of the corresponding positive number's numeral. The first use of negative numbers in a European work was by Nicolas Chuquet during the 15th century. He used them as exponents , but referred to them as "absurd numbers". As recently as

2040-430: Is a set R equipped with two binary operations + (addition) and ⋅ (multiplication) satisfying the following three sets of axioms, called the ring axioms : In notation, the multiplication symbol · is often omitted, in which case a · b is written as ab . In the terminology of this article, a ring is defined to have a multiplicative identity, while a structure with the same axiomatic definition but without

2125-444: Is a subset of the next one. So, for example, a rational number is also a real number, and every real number is also a complex number. This can be expressed symbolically as A more complete list of number sets appears in the following diagram. The most familiar numbers are the natural numbers (sometimes called whole numbers or counting numbers): 1, 2, 3, and so on. Traditionally, the sequence of natural numbers started with 1 (0

2210-691: Is a numeral that represents the number five. As only a relatively small number of symbols can be memorized, basic numerals are commonly organized in a numeral system , which is an organized way to represent any number. The most common numeral system is the Hindu–Arabic numeral system , which allows for the representation of any non-negative integer using a combination of ten fundamental numeric symbols, called digits . In addition to their use in counting and measuring, numerals are often used for labels (as with telephone numbers), for ordering (as with serial numbers ), and for codes (as with ISBNs ). In common usage,

2295-510: Is a ring: each axiom follows from the corresponding axiom for ⁠ Z . {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} .} ⁠ If x is an integer, the remainder of x when divided by 4 may be considered as an element of ⁠ Z / 4 Z , {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} ,} ⁠ and this element is often denoted by " x mod 4 " or x ¯ , {\displaystyle {\overline {x}},} which

2380-502: Is a subring of the field of real numbers and also a subring of the ring of polynomials ⁠ Z [ X ] {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [X]} ⁠ (in both cases, ⁠ Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } ⁠ contains 1, which is the multiplicative identity of the larger rings). On the other hand, the subset of even integers ⁠ 2 Z {\displaystyle 2\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ does not contain

2465-455: Is a subring of  R , called the centralizer (or commutant) of  X . The center is the centralizer of the entire ring  R . Elements or subsets of the center are said to be central in  R ; they (each individually) generate a subring of the center. Let R be a ring. A left ideal of R is a nonempty subset I of R such that for any x, y in I and r in R , the elements x + y and rx are in I . If R I denotes

2550-423: Is called the subring generated by  E . For a ring R , the smallest subring of R is called the characteristic subring of R . It can be generated through addition of copies of 1 and  −1 . It is possible that n · 1 = 1 + 1 + ... + 1 ( n times) can be zero. If n is the smallest positive integer such that this occurs, then n is called the characteristic of  R . In some rings, n · 1

2635-579: Is common for the Jain math sutra to include calculations of decimal-fraction approximations to pi or the square root of 2 . Similarly, Babylonian math texts used sexagesimal (base 60) fractions with great frequency. The earliest known use of irrational numbers was in the Indian Sulba Sutras composed between 800 and 500 BC. The first existence proofs of irrational numbers is usually attributed to Pythagoras , more specifically to

Number (disambiguation) - Misplaced Pages Continue

2720-790: Is consistent with the notation for 0, 1, 2, 3 . The additive inverse of any x ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {x}}} in ⁠ Z / 4 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ is − x ¯ = − x ¯ . {\displaystyle -{\overline {x}}={\overline {-x}}.} For example, − 3 ¯ = − 3 ¯ = 1 ¯ . {\displaystyle -{\overline {3}}={\overline {-3}}={\overline {1}}.} ⁠ Z / 4 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ has

2805-454: Is denoted by R or R * or U ( R ) . For example, if R is the ring of all square matrices of size n over a field, then R consists of the set of all invertible matrices of size n , and is called the general linear group . A subset S of R is called a subring if any one of the following equivalent conditions holds: For example, the ring ⁠ Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } ⁠ of integers

2890-538: Is largely due to Ernst Kummer , who also invented ideal numbers , which were expressed as geometrical entities by Felix Klein in 1893. In 1850 Victor Alexandre Puiseux took the key step of distinguishing between poles and branch points, and introduced the concept of essential singular points . This eventually led to the concept of the extended complex plane . Prime numbers have been studied throughout recorded history. They are positive integers that are divisible only by 1 and themselves. Euclid devoted one book of

2975-410: Is necessarily a zero divisor. An idempotent e {\displaystyle e} is an element such that e = e . One example of an idempotent element is a projection in linear algebra. A unit is an element a having a multiplicative inverse ; in this case the inverse is unique, and is denoted by a . The set of units of a ring is a group under ring multiplication; this group

3060-479: Is never zero for any positive integer n , and those rings are said to have characteristic zero . Given a ring R , let Z( R ) denote the set of all elements x in R such that x commutes with every element in R : xy = yx for any y in  R . Then Z( R ) is a subring of  R , called the center of  R . More generally, given a subset X of  R , let S be the set of all elements in R that commute with every element in  X . Then S

3145-588: Is not as complete as it is in the Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta . Records show that the Ancient Greeks seemed unsure about the status of 0 as a number: they asked themselves "How can 'nothing' be something?" leading to interesting philosophical and, by the Medieval period, religious arguments about the nature and existence of 0 and the vacuum. The paradoxes of Zeno of Elea depend in part on

3230-405: Is often used to represent an infinite quantity. Aristotle defined the traditional Western notion of mathematical infinity. He distinguished between actual infinity and potential infinity —the general consensus being that only the latter had true value. Galileo Galilei 's Two New Sciences discussed the idea of one-to-one correspondences between infinite sets. But the next major advance in

3315-434: Is the first book that mentions zero as a number, hence Brahmagupta is usually considered the first to formulate the concept of zero. He gave rules of using zero with negative and positive numbers, such as "zero plus a positive number is a positive number, and a negative number plus zero is the negative number". The Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta is the earliest known text to treat zero as a number in its own right, rather than as simply

3400-442: Is the underlying set equipped with only the operation of addition. Although the definition requires that the additive group be abelian, this can be inferred from the other ring axioms. The proof makes use of the " 1 ", and does not work in a rng. (For a rng, omitting the axiom of commutativity of addition leaves it inferable from the remaining rng assumptions only for elements that are products: ab + cd = cd + ab .) There are

3485-508: Is transcendental and Lindemann proved in 1882 that π is transcendental. Finally, Cantor showed that the set of all real numbers is uncountably infinite but the set of all algebraic numbers is countably infinite , so there is an uncountably infinite number of transcendental numbers. The earliest known conception of mathematical infinity appears in the Yajur Veda , an ancient Indian script, which at one point states, "If you remove

Number (disambiguation) - Misplaced Pages Continue

3570-568: The Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta , the main work of the Indian mathematician Brahmagupta . He treated 0 as a number and discussed operations involving it, including division . By this time (the 7th century) the concept had clearly reached Cambodia as Khmer numerals , and documentation shows the idea later spreading to China and the Islamic world . Brahmagupta's Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta

3655-697: The Elements to the theory of primes; in it he proved the infinitude of the primes and the fundamental theorem of arithmetic , and presented the Euclidean algorithm for finding the greatest common divisor of two numbers. In 240 BC, Eratosthenes used the Sieve of Eratosthenes to quickly isolate prime numbers. But most further development of the theory of primes in Europe dates to the Renaissance and later eras. In 1796, Adrien-Marie Legendre conjectured

3740-783: The Pythagorean Hippasus of Metapontum , who produced a (most likely geometrical) proof of the irrationality of the square root of 2 . The story goes that Hippasus discovered irrational numbers when trying to represent the square root of 2 as a fraction. However, Pythagoras believed in the absoluteness of numbers, and could not accept the existence of irrational numbers. He could not disprove their existence through logic, but he could not accept irrational numbers, and so, allegedly and frequently reported, he sentenced Hippasus to death by drowning, to impede spreading of this disconcerting news. The 16th century brought final European acceptance of negative integral and fractional numbers. By

3825-403: The R -span of I , that is, the set of finite sums then I is a left ideal if RI ⊆ I . Similarly, a right ideal is a subset I such that IR ⊆ I . A subset I is said to be a two-sided ideal or simply ideal if it is both a left ideal and right ideal. A one-sided or two-sided ideal is then an additive subgroup of R . If E is a subset of R , then RE is a left ideal, called

3910-726: The complex number system. In modern mathematics, number systems are considered important special examples of more general algebraic structures such as rings and fields , and the application of the term "number" is a matter of convention, without fundamental significance. Bones and other artifacts have been discovered with marks cut into them that many believe are tally marks . These tally marks may have been used for counting elapsed time, such as numbers of days, lunar cycles or keeping records of quantities, such as of animals. A tallying system has no concept of place value (as in modern decimal notation), which limits its representation of large numbers. Nonetheless, tallying systems are considered

3995-595: The prime number theorem , describing the asymptotic distribution of primes. Other results concerning the distribution of the primes include Euler's proof that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges, and the Goldbach conjecture , which claims that any sufficiently large even number is the sum of two primes. Yet another conjecture related to the distribution of prime numbers is the Riemann hypothesis , formulated by Bernhard Riemann in 1859. The prime number theorem

4080-461: The 16th century closed formulas for the roots of third and fourth degree polynomials were discovered by Italian mathematicians such as Niccolò Fontana Tartaglia and Gerolamo Cardano . It was soon realized that these formulas, even if one was only interested in real solutions, sometimes required the manipulation of square roots of negative numbers. This was doubly unsettling since they did not even consider negative numbers to be on firm ground at

4165-467: The 17th century, mathematicians generally used decimal fractions with modern notation. It was not, however, until the 19th century that mathematicians separated irrationals into algebraic and transcendental parts, and once more undertook the scientific study of irrationals. It had remained almost dormant since Euclid . In 1872, the publication of the theories of Karl Weierstrass (by his pupil E. Kossak), Eduard Heine , Georg Cantor , and Richard Dedekind

4250-412: The 1870s to the 1920s, with key contributions by Dedekind , Hilbert , Fraenkel , and Noether . Rings were first formalized as a generalization of Dedekind domains that occur in number theory , and of polynomial rings and rings of invariants that occur in algebraic geometry and invariant theory . They later proved useful in other branches of mathematics such as geometry and analysis . A ring

4335-595: The 18th century, it was common practice to ignore any negative results returned by equations on the assumption that they were meaningless. It is likely that the concept of fractional numbers dates to prehistoric times . The Ancient Egyptians used their Egyptian fraction notation for rational numbers in mathematical texts such as the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus and the Kahun Papyrus . Classical Greek and Indian mathematicians made studies of

SECTION 50

#1732780047180

4420-611: The 3rd century AD in Greece. Diophantus referred to the equation equivalent to 4 x + 20 = 0 (the solution is negative) in Arithmetica , saying that the equation gave an absurd result. During the 600s, negative numbers were in use in India to represent debts. Diophantus' previous reference was discussed more explicitly by Indian mathematician Brahmagupta , in Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta in 628, who used negative numbers to produce

4505-603: The Hellenistic zero had morphed into the Greek letter Omicron (otherwise meaning 70). Another true zero was used in tables alongside Roman numerals by 525 (first known use by Dionysius Exiguus ), but as a word, nulla meaning nothing , not as a symbol. When division produced 0 as a remainder, nihil , also meaning nothing , was used. These medieval zeros were used by all future medieval computists (calculators of Easter). An isolated use of their initial, N,

4590-416: The development of Greek mathematics , stimulating the investigation of many problems in number theory which are still of interest today. During the 19th century, mathematicians began to develop many different abstractions which share certain properties of numbers, and may be seen as extending the concept. Among the first were the hypercomplex numbers , which consist of various extensions or modifications of

4675-400: The empty sequence. Authors who follow either convention for the use of the term "ring" may use one of the following terms to refer to objects satisfying the other convention: For each nonnegative integer n , given a sequence ( a 1 , … , a n ) {\displaystyle (a_{1},\dots ,a_{n})} of n elements of R , one can define

4760-655: The first kind of abstract numeral system. The first known system with place value was the Mesopotamian base 60 system ( c.  3400  BC) and the earliest known base 10 system dates to 3100 BC in Egypt . Numbers should be distinguished from numerals , the symbols used to represent numbers. The Egyptians invented the first ciphered numeral system, and the Greeks followed by mapping their counting numbers onto Ionian and Doric alphabets. Roman numerals,

4845-417: The form a + bi , where a and b are integers (now called Gaussian integers ) or rational numbers. His student, Gotthold Eisenstein , studied the type a + bω , where ω is a complex root of x − 1 = 0 (now called Eisenstein integers ). Other such classes (called cyclotomic fields ) of complex numbers derive from the roots of unity x − 1 = 0 for higher values of k . This generalization

4930-744: The general form quadratic formula that remains in use today. However, in the 12th century in India, Bhaskara gives negative roots for quadratic equations but says the negative value "is in this case not to be taken, for it is inadequate; people do not approve of negative roots". European mathematicians, for the most part, resisted the concept of negative numbers until the 17th century, although Fibonacci allowed negative solutions in financial problems where they could be interpreted as debts (chapter 13 of Liber Abaci , 1202) and later as losses (in Flos ). René Descartes called them false roots as they cropped up in algebraic polynomials yet he found

5015-579: The idea of a cut (Schnitt) in the system of real numbers , separating all rational numbers into two groups having certain characteristic properties. The subject has received later contributions at the hands of Weierstrass, Kronecker , and Méray. The search for roots of quintic and higher degree equations was an important development, the Abel–Ruffini theorem ( Ruffini 1799, Abel 1824) showed that they could not be solved by radicals (formulas involving only arithmetical operations and roots). Hence it

5100-458: The identity element 1 and thus does not qualify as a subring of  ⁠ Z ; {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} ;} ⁠ one could call ⁠ 2 Z {\displaystyle 2\mathbb {Z} } ⁠ a subrng , however. An intersection of subrings is a subring. Given a subset E of R , the smallest subring of R containing E is the intersection of all subrings of R containing  E , and it

5185-409: The left ideal generated by E ; it is the smallest left ideal containing E . Similarly, one can consider the right ideal or the two-sided ideal generated by a subset of R . If x is in R , then Rx and xR are left ideals and right ideals, respectively; they are called the principal left ideals and right ideals generated by x . The principal ideal RxR is written as ( x ) . For example,

SECTION 60

#1732780047180

5270-429: The operations of matrix addition and matrix multiplication , M 2 ⁡ ( F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {M} _{2}(F)} satisfies the above ring axioms. The element ( 1 0 0 1 ) {\displaystyle \left({\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}}\right)} is the multiplicative identity of

5355-408: The product P n = ∏ i = 1 n a i {\displaystyle P_{n}=\prod _{i=1}^{n}a_{i}} recursively: let P 0 = 1 and let P m = P m −1 a m for 1 ≤ m ≤ n . As a special case, one can define nonnegative integer powers of an element a of a ring: a = 1 and a = a a for n ≥ 1 . Then

5440-509: The properties of numbers. Besides their practical uses, numbers have cultural significance throughout the world. For example, in Western society, the number 13 is often regarded as unlucky , and " a million " may signify "a lot" rather than an exact quantity. Though it is now regarded as pseudoscience , belief in a mystical significance of numbers, known as numerology , permeated ancient and medieval thought. Numerology heavily influenced

5525-403: The real numbers with a square root of −1 (and its combinations with real numbers by adding or subtracting its multiples). Calculations with numbers are done with arithmetical operations, the most familiar being addition , subtraction , multiplication , division , and exponentiation . Their study or usage is called arithmetic , a term which may also refer to number theory , the study of

5610-535: The requirement for a multiplicative identity is instead called a " rng " (IPA: / r ʊ ŋ / ) with a missing "i". For example, the set of even integers with the usual + and ⋅ is a rng, but not a ring. As explained in § History below, many authors apply the term "ring" without requiring a multiplicative identity. Although ring addition is commutative , ring multiplication is not required to be commutative: ab need not necessarily equal ba . Rings that also satisfy commutativity for multiplication (such as

5695-431: The requirement of the existence of a unity element is not sensible, and therefore unacceptable." Poonen makes the counterargument that the natural notion for rings would be the direct product rather than the direct sum. However, his main argument is that rings without a multiplicative identity are not totally associative, in the sense that they do not contain the product of any finite sequence of ring elements, including

5780-409: The ring is an abelian group with respect to the addition operator, and the multiplication operator is associative , is distributive over the addition operation, and has a multiplicative identity element . (Some authors define rings without requiring a multiplicative identity and instead call the structure defined above a ring with identity . See § Variations on the definition .) Whether

5865-441: The ring is noncommutative. More generally, for any ring R , commutative or not, and any nonnegative integer n , the square matrices of dimension n with entries in R form a ring; see Matrix ring . The study of rings originated from the theory of polynomial rings and the theory of algebraic integers . In 1871, Richard Dedekind defined the concept of the ring of integers of a number field. In this context, he introduced

5950-403: The ring of integers) are called commutative rings . Books on commutative algebra or algebraic geometry often adopt the convention that ring means commutative ring , to simplify terminology. In a ring, multiplicative inverses are not required to exist. A non zero commutative ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse is called a field . The additive group of a ring

6035-831: The ring. If A = ( 0 1 1 0 ) {\displaystyle A=\left({\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}}\right)} and B = ( 0 1 0 0 ) , {\displaystyle B=\left({\begin{smallmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{smallmatrix}}\right),} then A B = ( 0 0 0 1 ) {\displaystyle AB=\left({\begin{smallmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}}\right)} while B A = ( 1 0 0 0 ) ; {\displaystyle BA=\left({\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{smallmatrix}}\right);} this example shows that

6120-745: The set of all natural numbers is N , also written N {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} } , and sometimes N 0 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} _{0}} or N 1 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} _{1}} when it is necessary to indicate whether the set should start with 0 or 1, respectively. Ring (mathematics) Algebraic structures Related structures Algebraic number theory Noncommutative algebraic geometry Free algebra Clifford algebra In mathematics , rings are algebraic structures that generalize fields : multiplication need not be commutative and multiplicative inverses need not exist. Informally,

6205-539: The set of integers with their standard addition and multiplication, the set of polynomials with their addition and multiplication, the coordinate ring of an affine algebraic variety , and the ring of integers of a number field. Examples of noncommutative rings include the ring of n × n real square matrices with n ≥ 2 , group rings in representation theory , operator algebras in functional analysis , rings of differential operators , and cohomology rings in topology . The conceptualization of rings spanned

6290-473: The terms "ideal" (inspired by Ernst Kummer 's notion of ideal number) and "module" and studied their properties. Dedekind did not use the term "ring" and did not define the concept of a ring in a general setting. The term "Zahlring" (number ring) was coined by David Hilbert in 1892 and published in 1897. In 19th century German, the word "Ring" could mean "association", which is still used today in English in

6375-567: The theory of rational numbers, as part of the general study of number theory . The best known of these is Euclid's Elements , dating to roughly 300 BC. Of the Indian texts, the most relevant is the Sthananga Sutra , which also covers number theory as part of a general study of mathematics. The concept of decimal fractions is closely linked with decimal place-value notation; the two seem to have developed in tandem. For example, it

6460-408: The theory was made by Georg Cantor ; in 1895 he published a book about his new set theory , introducing, among other things, transfinite numbers and formulating the continuum hypothesis . In the 1960s, Abraham Robinson showed how infinitely large and infinitesimal numbers can be rigorously defined and used to develop the field of nonstandard analysis. The system of hyperreal numbers represents

6545-430: The time. When René Descartes coined the term "imaginary" for these quantities in 1637, he intended it as derogatory. (See imaginary number for a discussion of the "reality" of complex numbers.) A further source of confusion was that the equation seemed capriciously inconsistent with the algebraic identity which is valid for positive real numbers a and b , and was also used in complex number calculations with one of

6630-578: The uncertain interpretation of 0. (The ancient Greeks even questioned whether  1 was a number.) The late Olmec people of south-central Mexico began to use a symbol for zero, a shell glyph , in the New World, possibly by the 4th century BC but certainly by 40 BC, which became an integral part of Maya numerals and the Maya calendar . Maya arithmetic used base 4 and base 5 written as base 20. George I. Sánchez in 1961 reported

6715-420: The work of Abraham de Moivre and Leonhard Euler . De Moivre's formula (1730) states: while Euler's formula of complex analysis (1748) gave us: The existence of complex numbers was not completely accepted until Caspar Wessel described the geometrical interpretation in 1799. Carl Friedrich Gauss rediscovered and popularized it several years later, and as a result the theory of complex numbers received

6800-472: The writings of Joseph Louis Lagrange . Other noteworthy contributions have been made by Druckenmüller (1837), Kunze (1857), Lemke (1870), and Günther (1872). Ramus first connected the subject with determinants , resulting, with the subsequent contributions of Heine, Möbius , and Günther, in the theory of Kettenbruchdeterminanten . The existence of transcendental numbers was first established by Liouville (1844, 1851). Hermite proved in 1873 that e

6885-456: Was brought about. In 1869, Charles Méray had taken the same point of departure as Heine, but the theory is generally referred to the year 1872. Weierstrass's method was completely set forth by Salvatore Pincherle (1880), and Dedekind's has received additional prominence through the author's later work (1888) and endorsement by Paul Tannery (1894). Weierstrass, Cantor, and Heine base their theories on infinite series, while Dedekind founds his on

6970-539: Was finally proved by Jacques Hadamard and Charles de la Vallée-Poussin in 1896. Goldbach and Riemann's conjectures remain unproven and unrefuted. Numbers can be classified into sets , called number sets or number systems , such as the natural numbers and the real numbers . The main number systems are as follows: N 0 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} _{0}} or N 1 {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} _{1}} are sometimes used. Each of these number systems

7055-434: Was necessary to consider the wider set of algebraic numbers (all solutions to polynomial equations). Galois (1832) linked polynomial equations to group theory giving rise to the field of Galois theory . Simple continued fractions , closely related to irrational numbers (and due to Cataldi, 1613), received attention at the hands of Euler , and at the opening of the 19th century were brought into prominence through

7140-424: Was not even considered a number for the Ancient Greeks.) However, in the 19th century, set theorists and other mathematicians started including 0 ( cardinality of the empty set , i.e. 0 elements, where 0 is thus the smallest cardinal number ) in the set of natural numbers. Today, different mathematicians use the term to describe both sets, including 0 or not. The mathematical symbol for

7225-519: Was used in a table of Roman numerals by Bede or a colleague about 725, a true zero symbol. The abstract concept of negative numbers was recognized as early as 100–50 BC in China. The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art contains methods for finding the areas of figures; red rods were used to denote positive coefficients , black for negative. The first reference in a Western work was in

#179820