The Valspar Corporation is an American manufacturer of paint and coatings based in Minneapolis , Minnesota . With over 11,000 employees in 26 countries and a company history that spans two centuries, it was the sixth largest paint and coating corporation in the world. Valspar was founded in 1806 as a paint dealership in Boston, Massachusetts . The Valspar name emerged in 1903 as the name of a clear varnish and became the company name in 1932.
106-499: On March 20, 2016, Sherwin-Williams announced its intention to pay $ 9.3 billion to acquire Valspar. The acquisition finalized on June 1, 2017. In 1806, Samuel Tuck established a paint dealership in Boston, Massachusetts called "Paint and Color". Over the next 50 years, the dealership changed owners and names several times and was eventually acquired by Augustine Stimson. In 1832, Lawson Valentine incorporated Valentine & Company as
212-519: A National Historic Chemical Landmark . In 2016, the first paint registered as microbicidal with the United States Environmental Protection Agency was brought to market by Sherwin-Williams. In 2004, Sherwin-Williams acquired Paint Sundry Brands for $ 295 million and Duron Inc. for $ 253 million. In June 2007, Sherwin-Williams announced that it had completed an acquisition of M.A. Bruder & Sons,
318-794: A felony .... Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony .... Federal judges quickly began struggling with the broad wording of the Sherman Act, recognizing that interpreting it literally could make even simple business associations such as partnerships illegal. They began developing principles for distinguishing between "naked" trade restraints between rivals that suppressed competition and other restraints that were merely "ancillary" to cooperation agreements that promoted competition. The Sherman Act gave
424-403: A felony , and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $ 100,000,000 if a corporation , or, if any other person, $ 1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court. — Sherman Act 1890 § 1 Preventing collusion and cartels that act in restraint of trade is an essential task of antitrust law. It reflects
530-539: A broad range of legal and economic theory sees the role of antitrust laws as also controlling economic power in the public interest. Surveys of American Economic Association members since the 1970s have shown that professional economists generally agree with the statement: "Antitrust laws should be enforced vigorously." In the United States and Canada , and to a lesser extent in the European Union ,
636-632: A chemist for the company. Homer was one of only a few chemists in the U.S. at that time, and was the first such specialist recruited into the American varnish industry. In 1870, Valentine & Company relocated to New York City and acquired the Minnesota Linseed Oil Paint Company. Around this time, the company began to develop varnishes for use on vehicles that could compete with English-made varnishes. Henry Valentine succeeded his brother as president in 1882, taking over
742-569: A clear precedent, to which the situation is analogous, proof of an anti-competitive effect is more difficult. The reason for this is that the courts have endeavoured to draw a line between practices that restrain trade in a "good" compared to a "bad" way. In the first case, United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association , the Supreme Court found that railroad companies had acted unlawfully by setting up an organisation to fix transport prices. The railroads had protested that their intention
848-477: A company with operations in Boston, Chicago, New York City, and on the west coast of the U.S. Later, their operations expanded to Pennsylvania and Paris . Valspar was the first ever clear varnish; it was developed by L. Valentine Pulsifer, Lawson Valentine's grandson. Pulsifer had joined the company in 1903 after earning a degree in chemistry from Harvard University . After three years of experimentation, he created
954-423: A home run ball landed in the can after bouncing. Some commentators were upset that a donation wasn't made "due to a lame technicality", causing a public relations embarrassment. In November 2020, the company fired employee Tony Piloseno, who'd amassed over 1.4 million viewers on his TikTok paint mixing channel, Tonesterpaints , for alleged misconduct. The company was criticized for their perceived mishandling of
1060-723: A lawsuit brought by workers in California alleging underpayment of wages and failure to provide obligatory meal or rest breaks. In July 2020, Sherwin-Williams was sued in Ohio for breaching the Fair Labor Standards Act by underpaying staff. The case was dismissed in December 2020. Starting in 2008, businessman John Tyczki entered into an agreement with Sherwin-Williams on the basis of assurances provided by Sherwin-Williams about its water-based paint products. When
1166-543: A manufacturer and distributor of paints and coatings. On July 6, 2011, Sherwin-Williams acquired Leighs Paints, based in Bolton UK, manufacturers of intumescent and high performance industrial coatings. On June 4, 2012, Sherwin-Williams acquired Geocel Holdings Corp for an undisclosed amount. Sherwin-Williams acquired the Valspar Corporation on March 20, 2016, for $ 11.3 billion. In April 2022,
SECTION 10
#17327988112671272-518: A manufacturer of intumescent paints and high-performance coatings. In 1995, it employed 18,000 people, including 3,200 in Ohio. By 2002, the company operated more than 2,500 stores. In 1930, Sherwin-Williams moved its headquarters to Cleveland's Midland Building , where it would stay for over 75 years. In September 2019, the company announced that it would move its headquarters to a larger site, and in February 2020, confirmed it would remain in
1378-445: A monopoly in any line of commerce. — Clayton Act 1914 §3 In theory predatory pricing happens when large companies with huge cash reserves and large lines of credit stifle competition by selling their products and services at a loss for a time, to force their smaller competitors out of business. With no competition, they are then free to consolidate control of the industry and charge whatever prices they wish. At this point, there
1484-596: A monopoly. The FTC and the Justice Department both have the authority to file lawsuits seeking to block or invalidate unlawful mergers. The FTC may challenge a merger in its own administrative court instead of filing a lawsuit in a United States district court , although defendants can appeal the FTC's decisions to one of the United States courts of appeals . In addition to the FTC and the Justice Department,
1590-467: A number of exemptions. Mergers and joint agreements of professional football, hockey, baseball, and basketball leagues are exempt. Major League Baseball was held to be broadly exempt from antitrust law in the Supreme Court case Federal Baseball Club v. National League . The court unanimously held that the baseball league's organization meant that there was no commerce between the states taking place, even though teams traveled across state lines to put on
1696-519: A paint distributorship. After the partnership dissolved in 1870, he formed Sherwin, Williams, & Co. with Edward Williams and A.T. Osborn. For its first factory, in 1873 the company acquired a cooperage in Cleveland from Standard Oil . Sherwin-Williams was incorporated in Ohio on July 16, 1884, two years after Osborn sold his interest in the company while retaining the retail operations. The company grew through acquisitions and expansions in
1802-443: A party must wait 30 days while the FTC or the Justice Department reviews the merger and decides whether to seek to block it. The 30-day period usually ends with the FTC or Justice Department taking one of three actions: declining to challenge the merger, filing a lawsuit to challenge the merger, or issuing a "Second Request" that extends the waiting period and formally asks the party for all its documents and other information relating to
1908-550: A private party may also file a lawsuit under the Clayton Act if an unlawful merger has injured its ability to compete for business. Under the Hart–Scott–Rodino (HSR) Act of 1976 , any party wanting to execute a merger or acquisition must report it in advance to the FTC and the Justice Department, unless the sizes of the transaction and the parties executing it are both below certain thresholds. After filing its HSR report,
2014-610: A proposed merger was illegal even though the resulting company would have controlled only five percent of the relevant market. In a now-famous line from his dissent in the 1966 decision United States v. Von's Grocery Co. , Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart remarked: "The sole consistency that I can find [in U.S. merger law] is that in litigation under [the Clayton Act], the Government always wins." The "structuralist" interpretation of U.S. antitrust law began losing favor in
2120-416: A small number of competitors or oligopolists , have led to significant controversy over whether or not antitrust authorities should intervene. Fourth, vertical agreements between a business and a supplier or purchaser "up" or " downstream " raise concerns about the exercise of market power , however they are generally subject to a more relaxed standard under the "rule of reason". Some practices are deemed by
2226-435: A varnish manufacturer in Boston. The two businesses eventually merged under the name Stimson & Valentine. In 1855, Otis Merriam joined as a principal owner, and in 1860, Henry Valentine, Lawson's brother, joined the company. By 1866, both Stimson and Merriam had retired from the group and the company name was changed back to Valentine & Company. Lawson hired Charles Homer, brother of American artist Winslow Homer , as
SECTION 20
#17327988112672332-420: Is a cartel . It is irrelevant whether or not the businesses succeed in increasing their profits, or whether together they reach the level of having market power as might a monopoly . Such collusion is illegal per se . Bid rigging is a form of price fixing and market allocation that involves an agreement in which one party of a group of bidders will be designated to win the bid. Geographic market allocation
2438-426: Is also little motivation for investing in further technological research, since there are no competitors left to gain an advantage over. High barriers to entry such as large upfront investment, notably named sunk costs , requirements in infrastructure and exclusive agreements with distributors, customers, and wholesalers ensure that it will be difficult for any new competitors to enter the market, and that if any do,
2544-543: Is an American paints and coatings company based in Cleveland, Ohio . It is primarily engaged in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of paints, coatings, floorcoverings, and related products with operations in over 120 countries. As of 2024, is the largest coatings company in the world by revenue. Sherwin-Williams dates from 1866, when Cleveland bookkeeper Henry Sherwin invested in Truman Dunham & Co.,
2650-411: Is an agreement between competitors not to compete within each other's geographic territories. If an antitrust claim does not fall within a per se illegal category, the plaintiff must show the conduct causes harm in "restraint of trade" under the Sherman Act §1 according to "the facts peculiar to the business to which the restraint is applied". This essentially means that unless a plaintiff can point to
2756-486: Is investing $ 600 million (US) in its new facilities, providing working space for 3,500 employees. In 1875, Sherwin-Williams started selling ready-mixed paint. Previously, consumers bought paint ingredients that they themselves would mix together. In the 1940s, Sherwin-Williams introduced Kem-Tone, a water-based fast-drying interior paint. In 1996, the American Chemical Society named the product
2862-466: The Attorney General , to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. Such proceedings may be by way of petition setting forth the case and praying that such violation shall be enjoined or otherwise prohibited. When the parties complained of shall have been duly notified of such petition the court shall proceed, as soon as may be, to the hearing and determination of
2968-632: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice , and private parties who have been harmed by an antitrust violation. Criminal antitrust enforcement is done only by the Justice Department's Antitrust Division. Additionally, U.S. state governments may also enforce their own antitrust laws, which mostly mirror federal antitrust laws, regarding commerce occurring solely within their own state's borders. The scope of antitrust laws, and
3074-440: The Federal Trade Commission tried to block it because Valspar would have had too large a share of the resin market in the midwestern U.S. Valspar went ahead with the deal anyway, but divided the business between two companies: McWhorter Technologies and Engineered Polymer Solutions. Richard Rompala , formerly of PPG Industries , became president of Valspar in 1994, chief executive officer in 1995, and chairman in 1998. He pushed
3180-403: The Federal Trade Commission , can bring civil lawsuits enforcing the laws. The United States Department of Justice alone may bring criminal antitrust suits under federal antitrust laws. Perhaps the most famous antitrust enforcement actions brought by the federal government were the break-up of AT&T's local telephone service monopoly in the early 1980s and its actions against Microsoft in
3286-527: The GTE Sylvania Court ruled that non-price vertical restrictions in contracts were no longer per se illegal and should be analyzed under the rule of reason. Overall, the Supreme Court's antitrust rulings during this era on collusion cases under section 1 of the Sherman Act reflected tension between the older "absolutist" approach and the newer Chicago endorsing the rule of reason and economic analysis. The Justice Department and FTC lost most of
Valspar - Misplaced Pages Continue
3392-466: The Netscape browser. In 2000, the trial court ordered Microsoft to split in two, preventing it from future misbehavior. Microsoft appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit , which affirmed in part and reversed in part. In addition, it removed the judge from the case for discussing the case with the media while it was still pending. With the case in front of a new judge, Microsoft and
3498-622: The Noerr-Pennington doctrine . Also, regulations by states may be immune under the Parker immunity doctrine . Fourth, the government may grant monopolies in certain industries such as utilities and infrastructure where multiple players are seen as unfeasible or impractical. Fifth, insurance is allowed limited antitrust exemptions as provided by the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945. Sixth, M&A transactions in
3604-525: The Progressive Era prompted public officials to increase enforcement of antitrust laws. The Justice Department sued 45 companies under the Sherman Act during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt (1901–09) and 90 companies during the presidency of William Howard Taft (1909–13). In 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court reframed U.S. antitrust law as a " rule of reason " in its landmark decision Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States . At trial,
3710-754: The Sherman Act 1890 §7, these may be trebled, a measure to encourage private litigation to enforce the laws and act as a deterrent. The courts may award penalties under §§1 and 2, which are measured according to the size of the company or the business. In their inherent jurisdiction to prevent violations in future, the courts have additionally exercised the power to break up businesses into competing parts under different owners, although this remedy has rarely been exercised (examples include Standard Oil , Northern Securities Company , American Tobacco Company , AT&T Corporation and, although reversed on appeal, Microsoft ). Three levels of enforcement come from
3816-559: The United States , antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that govern the conduct and organization of businesses in order to promote economic competition and prevent unjustified monopolies . The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890 , the Clayton Act of 1914 , and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 . These acts serve three major functions. First, Section 1 of
3922-558: The associationalist view that close collaboration among business leaders and government officials could efficiently guide the economy. Some Americans abandoned faith in free market competition entirely after the Wall Street Crash of 1929 . Advocates of these views championed the passage of the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and the centralized economic planning experiments during
4028-637: The #58 Best Place to Work in IT. In 2015, Sherwin-Williams was recognized as the most used brand as well as the winner for brand familiarity and quality rating in the Paints category by Builder magazine. As of 2018, Sherwin-Williams was ranked 190th on the Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by revenue. In 2023, Sherwin-Williams was recognized as supplier of the year by Our Services, LLC of Michigan. United States antitrust law In
4134-671: The Cleveland area. That month, the company also began work on a new R&D center in Brecksville, OH . The new headquarters 's location was clarified in March 2020, with the company committing to constructing a new building complex, also in Downtown Cleveland. The downtown HQ was originally projected to open in 2023, but a construction pause due to the COVID-19 pandemic delayed the projected opening until 2024. The company
4240-729: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as an independent agency that has shared jurisdiction with the Justice Department over federal civil antitrust enforcement and has the power to prohibit "unfair methods of competition". Despite the passage of the Clayton Act and the FTC Act, U.S. antitrust enforcement was not aggressive between the mid-1910s and the 1930s. Based on their experience with the War Industries Board during World War I , many American economists, government officials, and business leaders adopted
4346-634: The Federal government, primarily through the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, the governments of states, and private parties. Public enforcement of antitrust laws is seen as important, given the cost, complexity and daunting task for private parties to bring litigation, particularly against large corporations. The federal government, via both the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and
Valspar - Misplaced Pages Continue
4452-477: The Justice Department had successfully argued that American petroleum conglomerate Standard Oil had violated the Sherman Act by building a monopoly in the oil refining industry through economic threats against competitors and secret rebate deals with railroads. On appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's verdict, holding that Standard Oil's high market share was proof of its monopoly power and ordering it to break itself up into 34 separate companies. At
4558-622: The Justice Department's Antitrust Division , which had been established in 1919. This intellectual shift influenced American courts to abandon their acceptance of sector-wide cooperation among companies. Instead, American antitrust jurisprudence began following strict "structuralist" rules that focused on markets' structures and their levels of concentration . Judges usually gave little credence to defendant companies' attempts to justify their conduct using economic efficiencies , even when they were supported by economic data and analysis. In its 1940 decision United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. ,
4664-570: The NFL as a "cartel" of 32 independent businesses subject to antitrust law, not a single entity. Third, antitrust laws are modified where they are perceived to encroach upon the media and free speech, or are not strong enough. Newspapers under joint operating agreements are allowed limited antitrust immunity under the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 . More generally, and partly because of concerns about media cross-ownership in
4770-452: The Sherman Act outlawed "monopoliz[ation]" and "every contract, combination ... or conspiracy in restraint of trade". Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
4876-511: The Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels , and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade. Second, Section 7 of the Clayton Act restricts the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. Third, Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization. Federal antitrust laws provide for both civil and criminal enforcement. Civil antitrust enforcement occurs through lawsuits filed by
4982-483: The Sherman Act. American courts were even stricter when hearing merger challenges under the Clayton Act during this era, due in part to Congress's passage of the Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 , which banned consolidation of companies' stock or assets even in situations that did not produce market dominance. For example, in its 1962 decision Brown Shoe Co. v. United States , the Supreme Court ruled that
5088-935: The Sherman and Clayton Acts. Much of their economic analysis involved game theory , which showed that some conduct that had been thought uniformly anticompetitive, such as preemptive capacity expansion, could be either pro- or anticompetitive depending on the circumstances. The writings of Yale Law School professor Robert Bork and University of Chicago Law School professors Richard Posner and Frank Easterbrook , who all later became prominent federal appellate judges, translated Chicago economists' analytical advances into legal principles that judges could readily apply. Pointing out that economic analysis showed that some previously condemned practices were actually procompetitive and had economic benefits that outweighed their dangers, they argued that many antitrust bright-line per se rules of illegality were unwarranted and should be replaced by
5194-782: The Supreme Court refused to apply the rule of reason to an agreement between oil refiners to buy up surplus gasoline from independent refining companies. It ruled that price-fixing agreements between competing companies were illegal per se under section 1 of the Sherman Act and would be treated as crimes even if the companies claimed to be merely recreating past government planning schemes. The Court began applying per se illegality to other business practices such as tying , group boycotts , market allocation agreements, exclusive territory agreements for sales, and vertical restraints limiting retailers to geographic areas. Courts also became more willing to find that dominant companies' business practices constituted illegal monopolization under section 2 of
5300-507: The Supreme Court's 1974 decision United States v. General Dynamics Corp. , the federal government lost a merger challenge at the Supreme Court for the first time in over 25 years. In 1999 a coalition of 19 states and the federal Justice Department sued Microsoft . A highly publicized trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found that Microsoft had strong-armed many companies in an attempt to prevent competition from
5406-550: The Supreme Court's decision in Standard Oil represented an effort by conservative federal judges to "soften" the Sherman Act and narrow its scope. Congress reacted in 1914 by passing two new laws: the Clayton Act, which outlawed using mergers and acquisitions to achieve monopolies and created an antitrust law exemption for collective bargaining ; and the Federal Trade Commission Act, which created
SECTION 50
#17327988112675512-557: The TikTok platform. In January 2014, the Santa Clara County Superior Court ruled that Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries and ConAgra were jointly and severally liable for $ 1.15 billion, to be paid into a lead paint abatement fund to be used to remove lead paint from older housing. The judge ruled that the paint companies manufactured, marketed, and sold lead paint without disclosing the health risks to
5618-409: The U.S. Department of Justice the authority to enforce it, but the U.S. presidents and U.S. Attorneys General in power during the 1890s and early 1900s showed relatively little interest in doing so. With little interest in enforcing the Sherman Act and courts interpreting it relatively narrowly, a wave of large industrial mergers swept the United States in the late 1890s and early 1900s. The rise of
5724-730: The United States , regulation of media is subject to specific statutes, chiefly the Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 , under the guidance of the Federal Communications Commission . The historical policy has been to use the state's licensing powers over the airwaves to promote plurality. Antitrust laws do not prevent companies from using the legal system or political process to attempt to reduce competition. Most of these activities are considered legal under
5830-697: The Valspar Corporation was formed, with Valentine & Company retained as a subsidiary. In 1960, Valspar merged with Ralph Baudhuin's Rockcote, which gave the company more manufacturing in the midwestern U.S. and a new headquarters in Ardmore, Pennsylvania . Under the leadership of Ralph and F. J. Baudhuin, Valspar averaged almost two acquisitions per year through the 1960s. In June 1970, Valspar merged with Minnesota Paints and relocated to Minneapolis, Minnesota . Its former president, C. Angus Wurtele, became chairman of Valspar in 1973. The influx of cash from this latest acquisition boosted Valspar's acquisition power, and by
5936-538: The blame to contaminated water in an effort" to avoid having to pay tens of millions of dollars in settlements. Almost 170 children had been affected by the potentially fatal lead poisoning . In December 2019, Sherwin-Williams was sued by New Jersey for discharging industrial waste from three sites and failing to disclose the pollution to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection . In May 2020, Sherwin-Williams agreed to pay $ 3.6M to settle
6042-474: The case; and pending such petition and before final decree, the court may at any time make such temporary restraining order or prohibition as shall be deemed just in the premises. — Sherman Act 1890 § 4 The remedies for violations of U.S. antitrust laws are as broad as any equitable remedy that a court has the power to make, as well as being able to impose penalties. When private parties have suffered an actionable loss, they may claim compensation. Under
6148-552: The center-field fence of Angel Stadium in Anaheim, California featured a giant paint can. In 2014, the owner of the billboard offered to donate $ 1 million to the Angels Baseball Foundation if a home run ball landed in the can on the fly, though the requirement the ball land on the fly was not noted on the billboard as the billboard simply stated “Angels home run in the can $ 1,000,000”. On September 19, 2017,
6254-416: The clear varnish, which went into production by 1905. The Valspar varnish was the company's main product for more than 30 years. The advertising tagline , "The varnish that won't turn white" made Valspar a household name. Famous users of Valspar included Robert Peary in his 1909 expedition, the U.S. military during World War I , and Charles Lindbergh during his 1927 solo intercontinental flight. In 1932,
6360-450: The close of business at 2:00 pm each day at any price other than that day's closing price did not violate the Sherman Act. The Court said that although the rule was a restraint on trade, a comprehensive examination of the rule's purposes and effects showed that it "merely regulates, and perhaps thereby promotes competition." During the mid-1930s, confidence in the statist centralized economic planning models that had been popular in
6466-635: The company announced that it had completed an acquisition of the European industrial coatings business of Sika AG. In June 2022, the company agreed to acquire Gross & Perthun GmbH. This Germany-based distributor primarily manufactures and distributes coatings for the heavy equipment and transportation industries. Sherwin-Williams has created more than 35,000 color names for paint over its history, and as of 2023, it has nearly 200 distinct shades of white classified as either warm or cool. Founded by Henry Sherwin and Edward Williams in Cleveland in 1866,
SECTION 60
#17327988112676572-483: The company operates through three segments: The Paint Stores Group, Consumer Brands Group, and Performance Coatings Group. Paint Stores Group, formerly the Americas Group, was the first section of the company to be established, in 1866. These stores market and sell Sherwin-Williams branded architectural paints and coatings, industrial and marine products, floorcovering, and related equipment and supplies. As of
6678-407: The condition , agreement, or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement, or understanding may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create
6784-711: The consumers in spite of "actual and constructive knowledge that it was harmful". In March 2014 Sherwin-Williams was denied a new trial. In July 2019, a $ 305 million settlement was reached. In 2018, multiple counties in Pennsylvania sued Sherwin-Williams over lead paint matters. Sherwin-Williams attempted to counter-sue, but that attempt was denied in October 2019, and the denial was upheld in July 2020. On April 9, 2018, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and representing attorneys uncovered that Sherwin-Williams tried to "shift
6890-461: The course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods , wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on
6996-513: The court must ordinarily consider the facts peculiar to the business to which the restraint is applied, its condition before and after the restraint was imposed, the nature of the restraint, and its effect, actual or probable. Section 7 of the Clayton Act makes it illegal to execute a merger or acquisition if the effect "may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly." No person engaged in commerce or in any activity affecting commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly,
7102-401: The courts to be so obviously detrimental that they are categorized as being automatically unlawful, or illegal per se . The simplest and central case of this is price fixing . This involves an agreement by businesses to set the price or consideration of a good or service which they buy or sell from others at a specific level. If the agreement is durable, the general term for these businesses
7208-595: The deal twice, Sherwin-Williams bought Comex's US and Canadian divisions for $ 165 million on September 16, 2013. PPG, US-based paint and coating company, acquired Comex's Mexican division for $ 2.3 billion. In March 2016, it was announced that Valspar would be acquired for $ 9.3 billion. The merger was finalized 1 June 2017. The Performance Coatings Group sells coatings and finishes to industrial, wood furniture manufacturing, marine, packaging, and automotive markets in more than 110 countries. The Group also contains Valspar's automotive refinishes business. A billboard near
7314-411: The decisions of a single enterprise, or a single economic entity, even though the form of an entity may be two or more separate legal persons or companies. In Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. it was held an agreement between a parent company and a wholly owned subsidiary could not be subject to antitrust law, because the decision took place within a single economic entity. This reflects
7420-464: The defense sector are often subject to greater antitrust scrutiny from the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission . The several district courts of the United States are invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of sections 1 to 7 of this title; and it shall be the duty of the several United States attorneys, in their respective districts, under the direction of
7526-454: The degree to which they should interfere in an enterprise's freedom to conduct business, or to protect smaller businesses, communities and consumers, are strongly debated. Some economists argue that antitrust laws actually impede competition, and may discourage businesses from pursuing activities that would be beneficial to society. One view suggests that antitrust laws should focus solely on the benefits to consumers and overall efficiency, while
7632-443: The discretion of the court. — Sherman Act 1890 §2 The law's treatment of monopolies is potentially the strongest in the field of antitrust law. Judicial remedies can force large organizations to be broken up, subject them to positive obligations , impose massive penalties, and/or sentence implicated employees to jail. Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, every "person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize ... any part of
7738-544: The early 1970s in the face of harsh criticism by economists and legal scholars from the University of Chicago . Scholars from the Chicago school of economics had long called for reducing price regulation and limiting barriers to entry . Newer Chicago economists like Aaron Director argued that there were economic efficiency explanations for some practices that had been condemned under the structuralist interpretation of
7844-504: The early 20th century as U.S. states passed laws that made it easier to create new corporations . In most other countries, antitrust law is now called " competition law " or "anti-monopoly law". American antitrust law formally began in 1890 with the U.S. Congress 's passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act , although a few U.S. states had passed local antitrust laws during the preceding year. Using broad and general terms,
7950-564: The early stages of the New Deal . The Supreme Court's decisions in antitrust cases during this period reflected these views, and the Court had a "largely tolerant" attitude toward collusion and cooperation between competitors. One prominent example was the 1918 decision Chicago Board of Trade v. United States , in which the Court ruled that a Chicago Board of Trade rule banning commodity brokers from buying or selling grain forwards after
8056-623: The early years of the New Deal era began to wane. At the urging of economists such as Frank Knight and Henry C. Simons , President Franklin D. Roosevelt 's economic advisors began persuading him that free market competition was the key to recovery from the Great Depression . Simons, in particular, argued for robust antitrust enforcement to “de-concentrate” American industries and promote competition. In response, Roosevelt appointed "trustbusting" lawyers like Thurman Arnold to serve in
8162-609: The end of 2019, Paint Stores Group had expanded to 4,758 stores, including more than 135 floorcovering centers. The Consumer Brands Group develops, manufactures, and distributes various paints, coatings, and related products, under the brand names of Anthony Angelillo, Bestt Liebco, Cabot, Dupli-Color, Duron, Dutch Boy , Frazee, Geocel, Guangdong Huarun Paints, H&C, HGTV Home, Kool Seal, Krylon , MAB , Martin-Senour, Mautz, Minwax , Pratt & Lambert , Purdy , Ronseal, Thompson's WaterSeal, Uniflex, Valspar, Wattyl, and White Lightning to third party customers in addition to overseeing
8268-412: The end of the decade, the company's annual revenue had increased by $ 74 million. Before the 1980s, Valspar's primary focus was on its consumer business. In 1984, the company acquired Mobil 's coatings division for $ 100 million, which was a low price because the division represented less than 0.5 percent of Mobil's total business. This acquisition effectively doubled Valspar's revenues. Valspar completed
8374-533: The games. That travel was merely incidental to a business which took place in each state. It was subsequently held in 1952 in Toolson v. New York Yankees , and then again in 1972 Flood v. Kuhn , that the baseball league's exemption was an "aberration". However Congress had accepted it, and favored it, so retroactively overruling the exemption was no longer a matter for the courts, but the legislature. In United States v. International Boxing Club of New York , it
8480-491: The government settled, with the government dropping the case in return for Microsoft agreeing to cease many of the practices the government challenged. Every contract , combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of
8586-424: The industry to sector specific regulation (frequently done, for example, in the cases water , education , energy or health care ). The law on public services and administration goes significantly beyond the realm of antitrust law's treatment of monopolies. When enterprises are not under public ownership, and where regulation does not foreclose the application of antitrust law, two requirements must be shown for
8692-598: The integration of Mobil's operations by 1986. Throughout the rest of the 1980s and during the early 1990s, Valspar continued to acquire paint and coatings companies and continued growing. It acquired the Enterprise Paint Companies in 1987, the McCloskey Corporation in 1989, and Hi-Tek Polymers and portions of Cook Paint and Varnish Company in 1991. Valspar announced in 1993 that it would acquire Cargill 's resin products division, but
8798-494: The late 19th and early 20th century. In the early 1920s, the company became the largest coatings manufacturer in the U.S. Sherwin-Williams experienced a downturn in the 1970s, and Gulf and Western Industries unsuccessfully attempted to take over. The company recovered by fending off the raid and undergoing a series of acquisitions in the 1980s and 1990s, as well as divesting its non-coatings businesses. On July 5, 2011, Sherwin-Williams acquired Leighs Paints based in Bolton UK,
8904-475: The law does not seek to prohibit every kind of agreement that hinders freedom of contract , it developed a " rule of reason " where a practice might restrict trade in a way that is seen as positive or beneficial for consumers or society. Third, significant problems of proof and identification of wrongdoing arise where businesses make no overt contact, or simply share information, but appear to act in concert. Tacit collusion , particularly in concentrated markets with
9010-420: The law draws a "basic distinction between concerted and independent action". Multi-firm conduct tends to be seen as more likely than single-firm conduct to have an unambiguously negative effect and "is judged more sternly". Generally the law identifies four main categories of agreement. First, some agreements such as price fixing or sharing markets are automatically unlawful, or illegal per se . Second, because
9116-549: The market's closing time (and then finalise the deals when it opened the next day). The reason for the Board of Trade having this rule was to ensure that all traders had an equal chance to trade at a transparent market price. It plainly restricted trading, but the Chicago Board of Trade argued this was beneficial. Justice Brandeis, giving judgment for a unanimous Supreme Court, held the rule to be pro-competitive, and comply with
9222-481: The merger. Every person who shall monopolize , or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony , and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $ 100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $ 1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in
9328-409: The modern law governing monopolies and economic competition is known by its original name — "antitrust law". The term "antitrust" came from late 19th-century American industrialists ' practice of using trusts —legal arrangements where one is given ownership of property to hold solely for another's benefit—to consolidate separate companies into large conglomerates. These " corporate trusts " died out in
9434-413: The monopolization cases they brought under section 2 of the Sherman Act during this era. One of the government's few anti-monopoly victories was United States v. AT&T , which led to the breakup of Bell Telephone and its monopoly on U.S. telephone service in 1982. The general "trimming back" of antitrust law in the face of economic analysis also resulted in more permissive standards for mergers. In
9540-543: The offense of monopolization. First, the alleged monopolist must possess sufficient power in an accurately defined market for its products or services. Second, the monopolist must have used its power in a prohibited way. The categories of prohibited conduct are not closed, and are contested in theory. Historically they have been held to include exclusive dealing , price discrimination , refusing to supply an essential facility , product tying and predatory pricing . It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in
9646-733: The operations maintained by the Paint Stores Group. On August 28, 2007, Sherwin Williams purchased Columbia Paint & Coatings. On July 6, 2011, Sherwin-Williams acquired Leighs Paints, based in Bolton UK, manufacturers of intumescent and high performance industrial coatings. In late 2012, Sherwin Williams began the process of purchasing the Comex Group . Comex was the 4th largest paint manufacturer in North America. After Mexican antitrust regulators voted against
9752-444: The products failed to live up to these assurances, causing ongoing problems for his business, Tyczki sued Sherwin-Williams and was awarded $ 2.88M. Sherwin-Williams Co reported Total CO 2 e emissions (Direct + Indirect) for the twelve months ending 31 December 2021 at 621 Kt (-14 /-2.1% y-o-y) and plans to reduce emissions by 30% by 2030 from a 2019 base year. On June 20, 2011, Computerworld named The Sherwin-Williams Company
9858-458: The rule of reason. Judges increasingly accepted their ideas from the mid-1970s on, motivated in part by the United States' declining economic dominance amidst the 1973–1975 recession and rising competition from East Asian and European countries. The "pivotal event" in this shift was the Supreme Court's 1977 decision Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc . In a decision that prominently cited Chicago school of economics scholarship,
9964-417: The rule of reason. It did not violate the Sherman Act §1. As he put it, Every agreement concerning trade, every regulation of trade, restrains. To bind, to restrain, is of their very essence. The true test of legality is whether the restraint imposed is such as merely regulates and perhaps thereby promotes competition or whether it is such as may suppress or even destroy competition. To determine that question,
10070-471: The same time, however, the Court also held that although the Sherman Act prohibited "every" restraint of trade, it actually banned only those that were "unreasonable". It ruled that the Sherman Act was to be interpreted as a "rule of reason" under which the legality of most business practices would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis according to their effect on competition, with only the most egregious practices being illegal per se . Many observers thought
10176-511: The situation with critics believing the company failed to realize the marketing opportunity they'd just lost. Piloseno received multiple offers of employment from Sherwin-Williams' industry rivals and took up a position with Florida Paints where he will have his own art studio and develop his own custom range of paints. Commentators pointed out the differing reaction the company had after going viral when compared to other companies such as Ocean Spray , who had positively reacted to going viral on
10282-831: The then-primarily North American company into China, Hong Kong, Brazil, Mexico, and South Africa and acquired a number of companies. In 2000, Valspar acquired Lilly Industries for $ 1.04 billion, which required Valspar to divest its mirror coatings business to conform with U.S. antitrust law . Because of the cooling economy, restructuring charges from 14 plant closings in 2001, increasing raw materials prices, and higher debt servicing costs, Valspar's 26 consecutive years of earnings growth ended. In 2005, Valspar bought Samuel Cabot Incorporated , known for its Cabot brand interior and exterior stains and finishes. Cabot had been privately owned since 1877. Sherwin-Williams acquired Valspar on June 1, 2017 in an all-cash deal valued at $ 9.3 billion. Sherwin-Williams Sherwin-Williams Company
10388-479: The theory of predatory pricing ). Antitrust laws do not apply to, or are modified in, several specific categories of enterprise (including sports, media, utilities, health care , insurance , banks , and financial markets ) and for several kinds of actor (such as employees or consumers taking collective action ). First, since the Clayton Act 1914 §6, there is no application of antitrust laws to agreements between employees to form or act in labor unions . This
10494-426: The trade or commerce among the several States" commits an offence. The courts have interpreted this to mean that monopoly is not unlawful per se , but only if acquired through prohibited conduct. Historically, where the ability of judicial remedies to combat market power have ended, the legislature of states or the Federal government have still intervened by taking public ownership of an enterprise, or subjecting
10600-399: The trust will have ample advance warning and time in which to either buy the competitor out, or engage in its own research and return to predatory pricing long enough to force the competitor out of business. Critics argue that the empirical evidence shows that "predatory pricing" does not work in practice and is better defeated by a truly free market than by antitrust laws (see Criticism of
10706-441: The view that each business has a duty to act independently on the market, and so earn its profits solely by providing better priced and quality products than its competitors. The Sherman Act §1 prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce." This targets two or more distinct enterprises acting together in a way that harms third parties. It does not capture
10812-474: The view that if the enterprise (as an economic entity) has not acquired a monopoly position, or has significant market power , then no harm is done. The same rationale has been extended to joint ventures , where corporate shareholders make a decision through a new company they form. In Texaco Inc. v. Dagher the Supreme Court held unanimously that a price set by a joint venture between Texaco and Shell Oil did not count as making an unlawful agreement. Thus
10918-458: The whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no person subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission shall acquire the whole or any part of the assets of another person engaged also in commerce or in any activity affecting commerce, where in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create
11024-711: Was held that, unlike baseball, boxing was not exempt, and in Radovich v. National Football League (NFL) , professional football is generally subject to antitrust laws. As a result of the AFL-NFL merger , the National Football League was also given exemptions in exchange for certain conditions, such as not directly competing with college or high school football. However, the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in American Needle Inc. v. NFL characterised
11130-614: Was seen as the "Bill of Rights" for labor, as the Act laid down that the "labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce". The purpose was to ensure that employees with unequal bargaining power were not prevented from combining in the same way that their employers could combine in corporations , subject to the restrictions on mergers that the Clayton Act set out. However, sufficiently autonomous workers, such as professional sports players have been held to fall within antitrust provisions. Second, professional sports leagues enjoy
11236-462: Was to keep prices low, not high. The court found that this was not true, but stated that not every "restraint of trade" in a literal sense could be unlawful. Just as under the common law, the restraint of trade had to be "unreasonable". In Chicago Board of Trade v. United States the Supreme Court found a "good" restraint of trade. The Chicago Board of Trade had a rule that commodities traders were not allowed to privately agree to sell or buy after
#266733