A rune is a letter in a set of related alphabets known as runic alphabets native to the Germanic peoples . Runes were used to write Germanic languages (with some exceptions) before they adopted the Latin alphabet , and for specialised purposes thereafter. In addition to representing a sound value (a phoneme ), runes can be used to represent the concepts after which they are named ( ideographs ). Scholars refer to instances of the latter as Begriffsrunen ('concept runes'). The Scandinavian variants are also known as fuþark , or futhark ; this name is derived from the first six letters of the script, ⟨ ᚠ ⟩, ⟨ ᚢ ⟩, ⟨ ᚦ ⟩, ⟨ ᚨ ⟩/⟨ ᚬ ⟩, ⟨ ᚱ ⟩, and ⟨ ᚲ ⟩/⟨ ᚴ ⟩, corresponding to the Latin letters ⟨f⟩, ⟨u⟩, ⟨þ⟩/⟨th⟩, ⟨a⟩, ⟨r⟩, and ⟨k⟩. The Anglo-Saxon variant is known as futhorc , or fuþorc , due to changes in Old English of the sounds represented by the fourth letter, ⟨ᚨ⟩/⟨ᚩ⟩.
68-460: Anglo-Saxon runes or Anglo-Frisian runes are runes that were used by the Anglo-Saxons and Medieval Frisians (collectively called Anglo-Frisians ) as an alphabet in their native writing system , recording both Old English and Old Frisian ( Old English : rūna , ᚱᚢᚾᚪ, "rune"). Today, the characters are known collectively as the futhorc (ᚠᚢᚦᚩᚱᚳ, fuþorc ) from the sound values of
136-405: A Northwest Germanic unity preceding the emergence of Proto-Norse proper from roughly the 5th century. An alternative suggestion explaining the impossibility of classifying the earliest inscriptions as either North or West Germanic is forwarded by È. A. Makaev, who presumes a "special runic koine ", an early "literary Germanic" employed by the entire Late Common Germanic linguistic community after
204-515: A Proto-Germanic form reconstructed as * rūnō , which may be translated as 'secret, mystery; secret conversation; rune'. It is the source of Gothic rūna ( 𐍂𐌿𐌽𐌰 , 'secret, mystery, counsel'), Old English rún ('whisper, mystery, secret, rune'), Old Saxon rūna ('secret counsel, confidential talk'), Middle Dutch rūne ('id'), Old High German rūna ('secret, mystery'), and Old Norse rún ('secret, mystery, rune'). The earliest Germanic epigraphic attestation
272-406: A rūnstæf (perhaps meaning something along the lines of "mystery letter" or "whisper letter"), or simply rūn . Futhorc inscriptions hold diverse styles and contents. Ochre has been detected on at least one English runestone , implying its runes were once painted. Bind runes are common in futhorc (relative to its small corpus), and were seemingly used most often to ensure the runes would fit in
340-470: A Danish fleet to Birka , but then changes his mind and asks the Danes to "draw lots". According to the story, this "drawing of lots" was quite informative, telling them that attacking Birka would bring bad luck and that they should attack a Slavic town instead. The tool in the "drawing of lots", however, is easily explainable as a hlautlein (lot-twig), which according to Foote and Wilson would be used in
408-668: A discussion of the Gothic alphabet . It also contains a description of the Old English runes . The Codex Vindobonensis 795 is a collection of letters of Alcuin, as compiled by Arno of Salzburg ; it also contains two texts about the topography of Rome, particularly its shrines: the Notitia ecclesiarium urbis Romae ( Notice of the church of the city of Rome ) and the De locis sanctis martyrum quae sunt foris civitatis Romae ( The locations of
476-504: A later formation that is partly derived from Late Latin runa , Old Norse rún , and Danish rune . The runes were in use among the Germanic peoples from the 1st or 2nd century AD. This period corresponds to the late Common Germanic stage linguistically, with a continuum of dialects not yet clearly separated into the three branches of later centuries: North Germanic , West Germanic , and East Germanic . No distinction
544-501: A limited space. Futhorc logography is attested to in a few manuscripts. This was done by having a rune stand for its name, or a similar sounding word. In the sole extant manuscript of the poem Beowulf , the ēðel rune was used as a logogram for the word ēðel (meaning "homeland", or "estate"). Both the Hackness Stone and Codex Vindobonensis 795 attest to futhorc Cipher runes . In one manuscript (Corpus Christi College, MS 041)
612-492: A number of Migration period Elder Futhark inscriptions as well as variants and abbreviations of them. Much speculation and study has been produced on the potential meaning of these inscriptions. Rhyming groups appear on some early bracteates that also may be magical in purpose, such as salusalu and luwatuwa . Further, an inscription on the Gummarp Runestone (500–700 AD) gives a cryptic inscription describing
680-548: A personal name (bįrnferþ), where it stands for a vowel or diphthong . Anglo-Saxon expert Gaby Waxenberger speculates that į may not be a true rune, but rather a bindrune of ᛁ and ᚩ , or the result of a mistake. Various runic combinations are found in the futhorc corpus. For example, the sequence ᚫᚪ appears on the Mortain Casket where ᛠ could theoretically have been used. A rune in Old English could be called
748-501: A profane and sometimes even of a vulgar nature. Following this find, it is nowadays commonly presumed that, at least in late use, Runic was a widespread and common writing system. In the later Middle Ages, runes also were used in the clog almanacs (sometimes called Runic staff , Prim , or Scandinavian calendar ) of Sweden and Estonia . The authenticity of some monuments bearing Runic inscriptions found in Northern America
SECTION 10
#1732801344705816-463: A son, taught him the runes. In 1555, the exiled Swedish archbishop Olaus Magnus recorded a tradition that a man named Kettil Runske had stolen three rune staffs from Odin and learned the runes and their magic. The Elder Futhark, used for writing Proto-Norse , consists of 24 runes that often are arranged in three groups of eight; each group is referred to as an ætt (Old Norse, meaning ' clan, group '). The earliest known sequential listing of
884-417: A spear, dedicated to Odin, myself to myself, on that tree of which no man knows from where its roots run. In stanza 139, Odin continues: Við hleifi mik seldo ne viþ hornigi, nysta ek niþr, nam ek vp rvnar, opandi nam, fell ek aptr þaðan. No bread did they give me nor a drink from a horn , downwards I peered; I took up the runes, screaming I took them, then I fell back from there. In
952-444: A tree, a dangling corpse in a noose, I can so carve and colour the runes, that the man walks and talks with me. The earliest runic inscriptions found on artifacts give the name of either the craftsman or the proprietor, or sometimes, remain a linguistic mystery. Due to this, it is possible that the early runes were not used so much as a simple writing system, but rather as magical signs to be used for charms. Although some say
1020-467: A way that would indicate that runic writing was any more inherently magical, than were other writing systems such as Latin or Greek. As Proto-Germanic evolved into its later language groups, the words assigned to the runes and the sounds represented by the runes themselves began to diverge somewhat and each culture would create new runes, rename or rearrange its rune names slightly, or stop using obsolete runes completely, to accommodate these changes. Thus,
1088-486: A writer seems to have used futhorc runes like Roman numerals , writing ᛉᛁᛁ ⁊ ᛉᛉᛉᛋᚹᛁᚦᚩᚱ, which likely means "12&30 more". There is some evidence of futhorc rune magic. The possibly magical alu sequence seems to appear on an urn found at Spong Hill in spiegelrunes (runes whose shapes are mirrored). In a tale from Bede's Ecclesiastical History (written in Latin), a man named Imma cannot be bound by his captors and
1156-490: A writing tablet, tweezers, a sun-dial, comb, bracteates , caskets, a font, dishes, and graffiti). The database includes, in addition, 16 inscriptions containing a single rune, several runic coins, and 8 cases of dubious runic characters (runelike signs, possible Latin characters, weathered characters). Comprising fewer than 200 inscriptions, the corpus is slightly larger than that of Continental Elder Futhark (about 80 inscriptions, c. 400–700), but slightly smaller than that of
1224-413: Is a public one, or the father of the family, if it is private, prays to the gods and, gazing to the heavens, picks up three separate strips and reads their meaning from the marks scored on them. If the lots forbid an enterprise, there can be no further consultation about it that day; if they allow it, further confirmation by divination is required. As Victoria Symons summarizes, "If the inscriptions made on
1292-452: Is an early borrowing from Proto-Germanic, and the source of the term for rune, riimukirjain , meaning 'scratched letter'. The root may also be found in the Baltic languages , where Lithuanian runoti means both 'to cut (with a knife)' and 'to speak'. The Old English form rún survived into the early modern period as roun , which is now obsolete. The modern English rune is
1360-420: Is asked if he is using "litteras solutorias" (loosening letters) to break his binds. In one Old English translation of the passage, Imma is asked if he is using "drycraft" (magic, druidcraft) or "runestaves" to break his binds. Furthermore, futhorc rings have been found with what appear to be enchanted inscriptions for the stanching of blood. The Old English and Old Frisian Runic Inscriptions database project at
1428-498: Is based on claiming that the earliest inscriptions of the 2nd and 3rd centuries, found in bogs and graves around Jutland (the Vimose inscriptions ), exhibit word endings that, being interpreted by Scandinavian scholars to be Proto-Norse , are considered unresolved and long having been the subject of discussion. In the early Runic period, differences between Germanic languages are generally presumed to be small. Another theory presumes
SECTION 20
#17328013447051496-442: Is best for him if he stays silent. The poem Hávamál explains that the originator of the runes was the major deity, Odin . Stanza 138 describes how Odin received the runes through self-sacrifice: Veit ek at ek hekk vindga meiði a netr allar nío, geiri vndaþr ok gefinn Oðni, sialfr sialfom mer, a þeim meiþi, er mangi veit, hvers hann af rótom renn. I know that I hung on a windy tree nine long nights, wounded with
1564-623: Is disputed; most of them have been dated to modern times. In Norse mythology , the runic alphabet is attested to a divine origin ( Old Norse : reginkunnr ). This is attested as early as on the Noleby Runestone from c. 600 AD that reads Runo fahi raginakundo toj[e'k]a... , meaning "I prepare the suitable divine rune..." and in an attestation from the 9th century on the Sparlösa Runestone , which reads Ok rað runaʀ þaʀ rægi[n]kundu , meaning "And interpret
1632-878: Is far from standardized. Notably the j , s , and ŋ runes undergo considerable modifications, while others, such as p and ï , remain unattested altogether prior to the first full futhark row on the Kylver Stone ( c. 400 AD). Artifacts such as spear heads or shield mounts have been found that bear runic marking that may be dated to 200 AD, as evidenced by artifacts found across northern Europe in Schleswig (North Germany), Funen , Zealand , Jutland (Denmark), and Scania (Sweden). Earlier—but less reliable—artifacts have been found in Meldorf , Süderdithmarschen [ de ] , in northern Germany; these include brooches and combs found in graves, most notably
1700-527: Is made in surviving runic inscriptions between long and short vowels, although such a distinction was certainly present phonologically in the spoken languages of the time. Similarly, there are no signs for labiovelars in the Elder Futhark (such signs were introduced in both the Anglo-Saxon futhorc and the Gothic alphabet as variants of p ; see peorð .) The formation of the Elder Futhark
1768-992: Is the Primitive Norse rūnō (accusative singular), found on the Einang stone (AD 350–400) and the Noleby stone (AD 450). The term is related to Proto-Celtic * rūna ('secret, magic'), which is attested in Old Irish rún ('mystery, secret'), Middle Welsh rin ('mystery, charm'), Middle Breton rin ('secret wisdom'), and possibly in the ancient Gaulish Cobrunus (< * com-rūnos 'confident'; cf. Middle Welsh cyfrin , Middle Breton queffrin , Middle Irish comrún 'shared secret, confidence') and Sacruna (< * sacro-runa 'sacred secret'), as well as in Lepontic Runatis (< * runo-ātis 'belonging to
1836-443: Is the academic study of the runic alphabets, runic inscriptions , runestones , and their history. Runology forms a specialised branch of Germanic philology . The earliest secure runic inscriptions date from around AD 150, with a potentially earlier inscription dating to AD 50 and Tacitus 's potential description of rune use from around AD 98. The Svingerud Runestone dates from between AD 1 and 250. Runes were generally replaced by
1904-561: The ᚪ āc rune may be from the 6th century, appearing on objects such as the Schweindorf solidus. The double-barred ᚻ hægl characteristic of continental inscriptions is first attested as late as 698, on St Cuthbert's coffin ; before that, the single-barred variant was used. In England, outside of the Brittonic West Country where evidence of Latin and even Ogham continued for several centuries, usage of
1972-519: The Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt , Germany aims at collecting the genuine corpus of Old English inscriptions containing more than two runes in its paper edition, while the electronic edition aims at including both genuine and doubtful inscriptions down to single-rune inscriptions. The corpus of the paper edition encompasses about one hundred objects (including stone slabs, stone crosses, bones, rings, brooches, weapons, urns,
2040-790: The Elder Futhark ( c. AD 150–800), the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc (400–1100), and the Younger Futhark (800–1100). The Younger Futhark is divided further into the long-branch runes (also called Danish , although they were also used in Norway , Sweden , and Frisia ); short-branch, or Rök , runes (also called Swedish–Norwegian , although they were also used in Denmark ); and the stavlösa , or Hälsinge, runes ( staveless runes ). The Younger Futhark developed further into
2108-524: The Latin alphabet as the cultures that had used runes underwent Christianisation , by approximately AD 700 in central Europe and 1100 in northern Europe . However, the use of runes persisted for specialized purposes beyond this period. Up until the early 20th century, runes were still used in rural Sweden for decorative purposes in Dalarna and on runic calendars . The three best-known runic alphabets are
Anglo-Saxon runes - Misplaced Pages Continue
2176-481: The Latin alphabet became prominent and Venetic culture diminished in importance, Germanic people could have adopted the Venetic alphabet within the 3rd century BC or even earlier. The angular shapes of the runes are shared with most contemporary alphabets of the period that were used for carving in wood or stone. There are no horizontal strokes: when carving a message on a flat staff or stick, it would be along
2244-481: The Latin alphabet itself over Rhaetic candidates. A "North Etruscan" thesis is supported by the inscription on the Negau helmet dating to the 2nd century BC. This is in a northern Etruscan alphabet but features a Germanic name, Harigast . Giuliano and Larissa Bonfante suggest that runes derived from some North Italic alphabet, specifically Venetic : But since Romans conquered Veneto after 200 BC, and then
2312-421: The Meldorf fibula , and are supposed to have the earliest markings resembling runic inscriptions. The stanza 157 of Hávamál attribute to runes the power to bring that which is dead back to life. In this stanza, Odin recounts a spell: Þat kann ek it tolfta, ef ek sé á tré uppi váfa virgilná,: svá ek ríst ok í rúnum fák, at sá gengr gumi ok mælir við mik. I know a twelfth one if I see up in
2380-760: The Ruthwell Cross , the Bramham Moor Ring , the Kingmoor Ring , and elsewhere. Gar appears in manuscripts, and epigraphically on the Ruthwell Cross and probably on the Bewcastle Cross . The unnamed ᛤ rune only appears on the Ruthwell Cross, where it seems to take calc 's place as /k/ where that consonant is followed by a secondary fronted vowel. Cweorð and stan only appear in manuscripts. The unnamed ę rune only appears on
2448-615: The medieval runes (1100–1500), and the Dalecarlian runes ( c. 1500–1800). The exact development of the early runic alphabet remains unclear but the script ultimately stems from the Phoenician alphabet . Early runes may have developed from the Raetic , Venetic , Etruscan , or Old Latin as candidates. At the time, all of these scripts had the same angular letter shapes suited for epigraphy , which would become characteristic of
2516-536: The 5th century onward and they continued to see use into the High Middle Ages . They were later accompanied and eventually overtaken by the Old English Latin alphabet introduced to Anglo-Saxon England by missionaries. Futhorc runes were no longer in common use by the eleventh century, but MS Oxford St John's College 17 indicates that fairly accurate understanding of them persisted into at least
2584-459: The Anglo-Saxon futhorc has several runes peculiar to itself to represent diphthongs unique to (or at least prevalent in) Old English. Some later runic finds are on monuments ( runestones ), which often contain solemn inscriptions about people who died or performed great deeds. For a long time it was presumed that this kind of grand inscription was the primary use of runes, and that their use
2652-667: The Baconsthorpe Grip. The unnamed į rune only appears on the Sedgeford Handle. While the rune poem and Cotton MS Domitian A IX present ᛡ as ior , and ᛄ as ger , epigraphically both are variants of ger (although ᛄ is only attested once outside of manuscripts (on the Brandon Pin). R.I. Page designated ior a pseudo-rune . There is little doubt that calc and gar are modified forms of cen and gyfu , and that they were invented to address
2720-736: The Germanic and Celtic words may have been a shared religious term borrowed from an unknown non-Indo-European language. In early Germanic, a rune could also be referred to as * rūna-stabaz , a compound of * rūnō and * stabaz ('staff; letter'). It is attested in Old Norse rúna-stafr , Old English rún-stæf , and Old High German rūn-stab . Other Germanic terms derived from * rūnō include * runōn ('counsellor'), * rūnjan and * ga-rūnjan ('secret, mystery'), * raunō ('trial, inquiry, experiment'), * hugi-rūnō ('secret of
2788-414: The Germanic peoples as utilizing a divination practice involving rune-like inscriptions: For divination and casting lots they have the highest possible regard. Their procedure for casting lots is uniform: They break off the branch of a fruit tree and slice into strips; they mark these by certain signs and throw them, as random chance will have it, on to a white cloth. Then a state priest, if the consultation
Anglo-Saxon runes - Misplaced Pages Continue
2856-573: The Poetic Edda poem Rígsþula another origin is related of how the runic alphabet became known to humans. The poem relates how Ríg , identified as Heimdall in the introduction, sired three sons— Thrall (slave), Churl (freeman), and Jarl (noble)—by human women. These sons became the ancestors of the three classes of humans indicated by their names. When Jarl reached an age when he began to handle weapons and show other signs of nobility, Ríg returned and, having claimed him as
2924-785: The Scandinavian Elder Futhark (about 260 inscriptions, c. 200–800). Runic finds in England cluster along the east coast with a few finds scattered further inland in Southern England. Frisian finds cluster in West Frisia . Looijenga (1997) lists 23 English (including two 7th-century Christian inscriptions) and 21 Frisian inscriptions predating the 9th century. Currently known inscriptions in Anglo-Frisian runes include: Runes Runology
2992-555: The actual sounds indicated by those letters, could vary depending on location and time. That being so, an authentic and unified list of runes is not possible. The sequence of the runes above is based on Codex Vindobonensis 795 . The first 24 of these runes directly continue the elder futhark letters, and do not deviate in sequence (though ᛞᛟ rather than ᛟᛞ is an attested sequence in both elder futhark and futhorc). The manuscripts Codex Sangallensis 878 and Cotton MS Domitian A IX have ᚣ precede ᛠ . The names of
3060-403: The ambiguity which arose from /k/ and /g/ spawning palatalized offshoots. R.I. Page designated cweorð and stan "pseudo-runes" because they appear pointless, and speculated that cweorð was invented merely to give futhorc an equivalent to 'Q'. The ę rune is likely a local innovation, possibly representing an unstressed vowel, and may derive its shape from ᛠ }. The unnamed į rune is found in
3128-426: The first six runes. The futhorc was a development from the older co-Germanic 24-character runic alphabet, known today as Elder Futhark , expanding to 28 characters in its older form and up to 34 characters in its younger form. In contemporary Scandinavia, the Elder Futhark developed into a shorter 16-character alphabet, today simply called Younger Futhark . Use of the Anglo-Frisian runes is likely to have started in
3196-478: The full set of 24 runes dates to approximately AD 400 and is found on the Kylver Stone in Gotland , Sweden. Codex Vindobonensis 795 The Codex Vindobonensis 795 ( Vienna Austrian National Library Codex) is a 9th-century manuscript, most likely compiled in 798 or shortly thereafter (after Arno of Salzburg returned from Rome to become archbishop). It contains letters and treatises by Alcuin , including
3264-735: The futhorc expanded. Runic writing in England became closely associated with the Latin scriptoria from the time of Anglo-Saxon Christianization in the 7th century. In some cases, texts would be written in the Latin alphabet, and þorn and ƿynn came to be used as extensions of the Latin alphabet. By the time of the Norman Conquest of 1066 it was very rare, and it disappeared altogether a few centuries thereafter. From at least five centuries of use, fewer than 200 artifacts bearing futhorc inscriptions have survived. Several famous English examples mix runes and Roman script, or Old English and Latin, on
3332-630: The grain, thus both less legible and more likely to split the wood. This characteristic is also shared by other alphabets, such as the early form of the Latin alphabet used for the Duenos inscription , but it is not universal, especially among early runic inscriptions, which frequently have variant rune shapes, including horizontal strokes. Runic manuscripts (that is written rather than carved runes, such as Codex Runicus ) also show horizontal strokes. The " West Germanic hypothesis" speculates on an introduction by West Germanic tribes . This hypothesis
3400-594: The holy martyrs outside the city of Rome ), neither of which were written by Alcuin. The manuscript seems to be an attempt to imagine the reconstruction of Rome , as it also contains correspondence between Arno and Alcuin about the rebuilding of the monastery of St. Stephen's at St. Paul's as well as commentary on the Epistle to the Romans . This article about a manuscript is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . This writing system –related article
3468-427: The lots that Tacitus refers to are understood to be letters, rather than other kinds of notations or symbols, then they would necessarily have been runes, since no other writing system was available to Germanic tribes at this time." Runic inscriptions from the 400-year period 150–550 AD are described as "Period I". These inscriptions are generally in Elder Futhark , but the set of letter shapes and bindrunes employed
SECTION 50
#17328013447053536-415: The mind, magical rune'), and * halja-rūnō ('witch, sorceress'; literally '[possessor of the] Hel -secret'). It is also often part of personal names, including Gothic Runilo ( 𐍂𐌿𐌽𐌹𐌻𐍉 ), Frankish Rúnfrid , Old Norse Alfrún , Dagrún , Guðrún , Sigrún , Ǫlrún , Old English Ælfrún , and Lombardic Goderūna . The Finnish word runo , meaning 'poem',
3604-589: The runes above are based on Codex Vindobonensis 795, besides the names ing and æsc which come from The Byrhtferth's Manuscript and replace the seemingly corrupted names lug and æs found in Codex Vindobonensis ;795. Ti is sometimes named tir or tyr in other manuscripts. The words in parentheses in the name column are standardized spellings. The runes in the second table, above, were not included in Codex Vindobonensis 795: Calc appears in manuscripts, and epigraphically on
3672-491: The runes and related scripts in the region. The process of transmission of the script is unknown. The oldest clear inscriptions are found in Denmark and northern Germany. A "West Germanic hypothesis" suggests transmission via Elbe Germanic groups, while a " Gothic hypothesis" presumes transmission via East Germanic expansion . Runes continue to be used in a wide variety of ways in modern popular culture. The name stems from
3740-484: The runes do not seem to have been in use at the time of Tacitus' writings. A second source is the Ynglinga saga , where Granmar , the king of Södermanland , goes to Uppsala for the blót . There, the "chips" fell in a way that said that he would not live long ( Féll honum þá svo spánn sem hann mundi eigi lengi lifa ). These "chips", however, are easily explainable as a blótspánn (sacrificial chip), which
3808-490: The runes of divine origin". In the Poetic Edda poem Hávamál , Stanza 80, the runes also are described as reginkunnr : Þat er þá reynt, er þú at rúnum spyrr inum reginkunnum, þeim er gerðu ginnregin ok fáði fimbulþulr, þá hefir hann bazt, ef hann þegir. That is now proved, what you asked of the runes, of the potent famous ones, which the great gods made, and the mighty sage stained, that it
3876-579: The runes were used for divination , there is no direct evidence to suggest they were ever used in this way. The name rune itself, taken to mean "secret, something hidden", seems to indicate that knowledge of the runes was originally considered esoteric, or restricted to an elite. The 6th-century Björketorp Runestone warns in Proto-Norse using the word rune in both senses: Haidzruno runu, falahak haidera, ginnarunaz. Arageu haeramalausz uti az. Weladaude, sa'z þat barutz. Uþarba spa. I, master of
3944-660: The runes(?) conceal here runes of power. Incessantly (plagued by) maleficence, (doomed to) insidious death (is) he who breaks this (monument). I prophesy destruction / prophecy of destruction. The same curse and use of the word, rune, is also found on the Stentoften Runestone . There also are some inscriptions suggesting a medieval belief in the magical significance of runes, such as the Franks Casket (AD 700) panel. Charm words, such as auja , laþu , laukaʀ , and most commonly, alu , appear on
4012-425: The same manner as a blótspánn . The lack of extensive knowledge on historical use of the runes has not stopped modern authors from extrapolating entire systems of divination from what few specifics exist, usually loosely based on the reconstructed names of the runes and additional outside influence. A recent study of runic magic suggests that runes were used to create magical objects such as amulets, but not in
4080-726: The same object, including the Franks Casket and St Cuthbert's coffin ; in the latter, three of the names of the Four Evangelists are given in Latin written in runes, but "LUKAS" ( Saint Luke ) is in Roman script. The coffin is also an example of an object created at the heart of the Anglo-Saxon church that uses runes. A leading expert, Raymond Ian Page , rejects the assumption often made in non-scholarly literature that runes were especially associated in post-conversion Anglo-Saxon England with Anglo-Saxon paganism or magic. The letter sequence and letter inventory of futhorc, along with
4148-654: The secret'). However, it is difficult to tell whether they are cognates (linguistic siblings from a common origin), or if the Proto-Germanic form reflects an early borrowing from Celtic. Various connections have been proposed with other Indo-European terms (for example: Sanskrit ráuti रौति 'roar', Latin rūmor 'noise, rumor'; Ancient Greek eréō ἐρέω 'ask' and ereunáō ἐρευνάω 'investigate'), although linguist Ranko Matasović finds them difficult to justify for semantic or linguistic reasons. Because of this, some scholars have speculated that
SECTION 60
#17328013447054216-555: The separation of Gothic (2nd to 5th centuries), while the spoken dialects may already have been more diverse. With the potential exception of the Meldorf fibula , a possible runic inscription found in Schleswig-Holstein dating to around 50 AD, the earliest reference to runes (and runic divination) may occur in Roman Senator Tacitus's ethnographic Germania . Dating from around 98 CE, Tacitus describes
4284-512: The twelfth century. There are competing theories about the origins of the Anglo-Saxon futhorc. One theory proposes that it was developed in Frisia and from there later spread to Britain . Another holds that runes were first introduced to Britain from the mainland where they were then modified and exported to Frisia. Both theories have their inherent weaknesses, and a definitive answer may come from further archaeological evidence. The early futhorc
4352-704: The use of three runic letters followed by the Elder Futhark f-rune written three times in succession. Nevertheless, it has proven difficult to find unambiguous traces of runic "oracles": although Norse literature is full of references to runes, it nowhere contains specific instructions on divination. There are at least three sources on divination with rather vague descriptions that may, or may not, refer to runes: Tacitus 's 1st-century Germania , Snorri Sturluson 's 13th-century Ynglinga saga , and Rimbert 's 9th-century Vita Ansgari . The first source, Tacitus's Germania , describes "signs" chosen in groups of three and cut from "a nut-bearing tree", although
4420-423: Was "marked, possibly with sacrificial blood, shaken, and thrown down like dice, and their positive or negative significance then decided." The third source is Rimbert's Vita Ansgari , where there are three accounts of what some believe to be the use of runes for divination, but Rimbert calls it "drawing lots". One of these accounts is the description of how a renegade Swedish king, Anund Uppsale , first brings
4488-571: Was associated with a certain societal class of rune carvers. In the mid-1950s, however, approximately 670 inscriptions, known as the Bryggen inscriptions , were found in Bergen . These inscriptions were made on wood and bone, often in the shape of sticks of various sizes, and contained information of an everyday nature—ranging from name tags, prayers (often in Latin ), personal messages, business letters, and expressions of affection, to bawdy phrases of
4556-555: Was complete by the early 5th century, with the Kylver Stone being the first evidence of the futhark ordering as well as of the p rune. Specifically, the Rhaetic alphabet of Bolzano is often advanced as a candidate for the origin of the runes, with only five Elder Futhark runes ( ᛖ e , ᛇ ï , ᛃ j , ᛜ ŋ , ᛈ p ) having no counterpart in the Bolzano alphabet. Scandinavian scholars tend to favor derivation from
4624-526: Was nearly identical to the Elder Futhark, except for the split of ᚨ a into three variants ᚪ āc , ᚫ æsc and ᚩ ōs , resulting in 26 runes. This was done to account for the new phoneme produced by the Ingvaeonic split of allophones of long and short a . The earliest known instance of the ᚩ ōs rune may be from the 5th century, on the Undley bracteate . The earliest known instances of
#704295