Misplaced Pages

#177822

58-598: The Mesoamerican Long Count calendar is a non-repeating base-20 and base-18 calendar used by pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures, most notably the Maya . For this reason, it is often known as the Maya Long Count calendar . Using a modified vigesimal tally, the Long Count calendar identifies a day by counting the number of days passed since a mythical creation date that corresponds to August 11, 3114 BCE in

116-532: A Venus table which records the heliacal risings of Venus. Using the GMT correlation these agree closely with modern astronomical calculations. Archaeological : Various items that can be associated with specific Long Count dates have been isotope dated . In 1959 the University of Pennsylvania carbon dated samples from ten wood lintels from Tikal . These were carved with a date equivalent to 741 AD, using

174-599: A Distance Number that is to be added to the Long Count date to arrive at this future date. For example, on the west panel at the Temple of Inscriptions in Palenque , a section of the text projects into the future to the 80th Calendar Round (CR) 'anniversary' of the famous Palenque ruler Kʼinich Janaabʼ Pakal 's accession to the throne (Pakal's accession occurred on a Calendar Round date 5 Lamat 1 Mol, at Long Count 9.9.2.4.8 equivalent to 27 July 615 CE in

232-467: A date of 36 BCE, although Stela 2 from Takalik Abaj , Guatemala might be earlier. [2] Takalik Abaj Stela 2's highly battered Long Count inscription shows 7  bak'tuns , followed by k'atuns with a tentative 6 coefficient, but that could also be 11 or 16, giving the range of possible dates to fall between 236 and 19 BCE. Although Takalik Abaj Stela 2 remains controversial, this table includes it, as well as six other artifacts with

290-407: A leap year with the exception of centuries not evenly divisible by 400 (e.g. 100, 200, 300). When the year is divisible by 400 (e.g. 400, 800, etc.), do not add an extra day. The calculated year is 644 CE. The number of leap days, keeping in mind that the year 600 is not a leap year, is 10. Subtracting that from 317 remainder days is 307; in other words, the 307th day of the year 644 CE, which

348-461: A new Moon when the lunar phase day was 1.7 at 6 pm on October 11, 755 (Julian calendar). This works well for many but not all lunar inscriptions. Modern astronomers refer to the conjunction of the Sun and Moon (the time when the Sun and Moon have the same ecliptic longitude) as the new moon. But Mesoamerican astronomy was observational , not theoretical. The people of Mesoamerica did not know about

406-552: A period known as the Calendar Round . To identify days over periods longer than this, Mesoamericans used the Long Count calendar. The Long Count calendar identifies a date by counting the number of days from a starting date that is generally calculated to be August 11, 3114 BCE in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or September 6 in the Julian calendar (or −3113 in astronomical year numbering). There has been much debate over

464-417: A ruler's inscription and the recently discovered La Corona Hieroglyphic Stairway 2, Block V. Maya inscriptions occasionally reference future predicted events or commemorations that would occur on dates that lie beyond 2012 (that is, beyond the completion of the 13th  bʼakʼtun of the current era). Most of these are in the form of "distance dates" where some Long Count date is given, together with

522-554: A set that formed as few recognizable words as possible. The alphabet is also intended to reduce typographical errors by avoiding visually similar digits, and is case-insensitive. This table shows the Maya numerals and the number names in Yucatec Maya , Nahuatl in modern orthography and in Classical Nahuatl . Epi-Olmec script The Isthmian script is an early set of symbols found in inscriptions around

580-641: Is November 3. To summarize: the Long Count date 9.10.11.17.0 corresponds to November 3, 644 CE, in the Proleptic Gregorian calendar . To convert a Julian day to a Julian/Gregorian astronomical date ( Proleptic Julian calendar before 46 BCE): Use an astronomical algorithm such as the Method of Meeus to convert the Julian day to a Julian/Gregorian date with astronomical dating of negative years: In this example: In this example

638-453: Is at least 1.5. If one assumes that the new moon is the first day when the lunar phase day is at least 1.5 at six in the evening in time zone UTC−6 (the time zone of the Maya area), the GMT correlation will match many lunar inscriptions exactly. In this example the lunar phase day was 27.7 (26 days counting from zero) at 6 pm after a conjunction at 1:25 am October 10, 755 and

SECTION 10

#1732776354178

696-459: Is congruent to 1 (mod 4). Thus, according to Artin's conjecture on primitive roots , vigesimal has infinitely many cyclic primes, but the fraction of primes that are cyclic is not necessarily ~37.395%. An UnrealScript program that computes the lengths of recurring periods of various fractions in a given set of bases found that, of the first 15,456 primes, ~39.344% are cyclic in vigesimal. In several European languages like French and Danish , 20

754-447: Is divisible by two and five and is adjacent to 21, the product of three and seven, thus covering the first four prime numbers, many vigesimal fractions have simple representations, whether terminating or recurring (although thirds are more complicated than in decimal, repeating two digits instead of one). In decimal, dividing by three twice (ninths) only gives one digit periods ( ⁠ 1 / 9 ⁠ = 0.1111.... for instance) because 9

812-483: Is more complex. The date sequence is given once, at the beginning of the inscription and opens with the so-called ISIG (Introductory Series Initial Glyph) which reads tzik-a(h) habʼ [patron of Haabʼ month] ("revered was the year-count with the patron [of the month]"). Next come the 5 digits of the Long Count, followed by the Calendar Round (tzolkʼin and Haabʼ) and supplementary series . The supplementary series

870-404: Is optional and contains lunar data, for example, the age of the moon on the day and the calculated length of current lunation . The text then continues with whatever activity occurred on that date. A drawing of a full Maya Long Count inscription is shown below . The earliest contemporaneous Long Count inscription yet discovered is on Stela 2 at Chiapa de Corzo , Chiapas , Mexico, showing

928-483: Is still under discussion. In Lost Languages (2008) Andrew Robinson summarises the position as follows: Overall, then, the case for the Justeson/Kaufman 'decipherment' of Isthmian is decidedly unproven and currently rests on shaky foundations ... What it needs, more urgently than some other 'decipherments' given its evident linguistic sophistication, is the discovery of a new text or texts as substantial as

986-539: Is structurally similar to the Maya script , and like Maya uses one set of characters to represent morphemes , and a second set to represent syllables . The four most extensive Isthmian texts are those found on: Other texts include: In a 1993 paper, John Justeson and Terrence Kaufman proposed a partial decipherment of the Isthmian text found on the La Mojarra Stela, claiming that the language represented

1044-413: Is the number below ten. 21, however, the number adjacent to 20 that is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. Ninths in vigesimal have six-digit periods. As 20 has the same prime factors as 10 (two and five), a fraction will terminate in decimal if and only if it terminates in vigesimal. The prime factorization of twenty is 2  × 5, so it is not a perfect power . However, its squarefree part, 5,

1102-670: Is used as a base, at least with respect to the linguistic structure of the names of certain numbers (though a thoroughgoing consistent vigesimal system, based on the powers 20, 400, 8000 etc., is not generally used). Many cultures that use a vigesimal system count in fives to twenty, then count twenties similarly. Such a system is referred to as quinary-vigesimal by linguists. Examples include Greenlandic , Iñupiaq , Kaktovik , Maya , Nunivak Cupʼig , and Yupʼik numerals. Vigesimal systems are common in Africa, for example in Yoruba . While

1160-573: The Copernican nature of the solar system — they had no theoretical understanding of the orbital nature of the heavenly bodies. Some authors analyze the lunar inscriptions based on this modern understanding of the motions of the Moon but there is no evidence that the Mesoamericans shared it. The first method seems to have been used for other inscriptions such as Quirgua stela E (9.17.0.0.0). By

1218-602: The Isthmus of Tehuantepec , dating to c.  500 BCE – 500 CE , though with dates subject to disagreement. It is also called the La Mojarra script and the Epi-Olmec script ('post-Olmec script'). It has not been conclusively determined whether Isthmian script is a true writing system that represents a spoken language, or is a system of proto-writing . According to a disputed partial decipherment, it

SECTION 20

#1732776354178

1276-399: The Julian date is noon October 31, 644. The Method of Meeus is not valid for negative year numbers (astronomical), so another method such as the method of Peter Baum should be used. A full Long Count date not only includes the five digits of the Long Count, but the 2 character Tzolkʼin and the two-character Haabʼ dates as well. The five digit Long Count can therefore be confirmed with

1334-743: The Tzolkʼin ( Tonalpohualli ) date of the event was 1 Snake. Post-conquest scholars such as Sahagún and Durán recorded Tonalpohualli dates with a calendar date. Many indigenous communities in the Mexican states of Veracruz, Oaxaca and Chiapas and in Guatemala, principally those speaking the Mayan languages Ixil, Mam, Pokomchí and Quiché, keep the Tzolkʼin and in many cases the Haabʼ. These are all consistent with

1392-500: The proleptic Gregorian calendar ). It does this by commencing with Pakal's birthdate 9.8.9.13.0   8 Ajaw 13 Pop (24 March 603 CE Gregorian ) and adding to it the Distance Number 10.11.10.5.8. This calculation arrives at the 80th Calendar Round since his accession, a day that also has a CR date of 5 Lamat 1 Mol , but which lies over 4,000 years in the future from Pakal's time—the day 21 October in

1450-684: The proleptic Gregorian calendar . The Long Count calendar was widely used on monuments. The two most widely used calendars in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica were the 260-day Tzolkʼin and the 365-day Haabʼ . The equivalent Aztec calendars are known in Nahuatl as the Tonalpohualli and Xiuhpohualli , respectively. The combination of a Haabʼ and a Tzolkʼin date identifies a day in a combination which does not occur again for 18,980 days (52 Haabʼ cycles of 365 days equals 73 Tzolkʼin cycles of 260 days, approximately 52 years),

1508-587: The supplementary series . For example: An inscription at the Temple of the Sun at Palenque records that on Long Count 9.16.4.10.8 there were 26 days completed in a 30-day lunation. This Long Count is also the entry date for the eclipse table of the Dresden Codex . Using the third method, the Palenque system, the new moon would have been the first evening when one could look to the west after sunset and see

1566-540: The Chronicle of Oxcutzkab and the books of Chilam Balam . De Landa records a date that is a Tun ending in the Short Count . Oxkutzcab contains 12 Tun endings. Bricker and Bricker find that only the GMT correlation is consistent with these dates. The Book of Chilam Balam of Chumayel contains the only colonial reference to classic long-count dates. The Julian calendar date of 11.16.0.0.0 (November 2, 1539) confirms

1624-694: The Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies in Crystal River, Florida . To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday event or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is 'a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in. ' " "There will be another cycle," says E. Wyllys Andrews V, director of the Tulane University Middle American Research Institute (MARI). "We know

1682-486: The GMT correlation, the current creation started on September 6, −3113 ( Julian astronomical) – August 11, 3114 BCE in the Proleptic Gregorian calendar . The study of correlating the Maya and western calendar is referred to as the correlation question. The GMT correlation is also called the 11.16 correlation. In Breaking the Maya Code , Michael D. Coe writes: "In spite of oceans of ink that have been spilled on

1740-568: The GMT correlation. The Annals of the Cakchiquels contains numerous Tzolkʼin dates correlated with European dates. These confirm the GMT correlation. Weeks, Sachse and Prager transcribed three divinatory calendars from highland Guatemala. They found that the 1772 calendar confirms the GMT correlation. The fall of the capital city of the Aztec Empire, Tenochtitlan , occurred on August 13, 1521. A number of different chroniclers wrote that

1798-439: The GMT correlation. Munro Edmonsen studied 60 Mesoamerican calendars, 20 of which have known correlations to European calendars, and found remarkable consistency among them and that only the GMT correlation fits the historical, ethnographic and astronomical evidence. Astronomical : Any correct correlation must match the astronomical content of classic inscriptions. The GMT correlation does an excellent job of matching lunar data in

Mesoamerican Long Count calendar - Misplaced Pages Continue

1856-604: The GMT correlation. The average carbon date was 746±34 years. Recently one of these, Lintel 3 from Temple I, was analyzed again using more accurate methods and found to agree closely with the GMT correlation. In 2012, using modern AMS radiocarbon dating, a single beam from Tikal was dated, also strongly supporting the GMT. If a proposed correlation only has to agree with one of these lines of evidence there could be numerous other possibilities. Astronomers have proposed many correlations, for example: Lounsbury , Fuls, et al. , Böhm and Böhm and Stock. Today, 28 November 2024 ( UTC ), in

1914-561: The La Mojarra text was disputed by Stephen D. Houston and Michael D. Coe , who had tried unsuccessfully to apply the Justeson-Kaufman decipherment-system to the Isthmian text on the back of the hitherto unknown Teotihuacan-style mask (which is of unknown provenance and is now in a private collection). Along with proposing an alternative linguistic attribution of Epi-Olmec writing as proto- Huastecan , Vonk (2020) argued that

1972-603: The Long Count calendar predates the Maya. La Mojarra Stela 1, the Tuxtla Statuette, Tres Zapotes Stela C and Chiapa Stela 2 are all inscribed in an Epi-Olmec , not Maya, style. El Baúl Stela 2, on the other hand, was created in the Izapan style. The first unequivocally Maya artifact is Stela 29 from Tikal , with the Long Count date of 292 CE (8.12.14.8.15), more than 300 years after Stela 2 from Chiapa de Corzo. More recently, with

2030-646: The Long Count is 13.0.12.2.0 (using GMT correlation). According to the Popol Vuh , a book compiling details of creation accounts known to the Kʼicheʼ Maya of the Colonial-era highlands, humankind lives in the fourth world. The Popol Vuh describes the first three creations that the gods failed in making and the creation of the successful fourth world where men were placed. In the Maya Long Count,

2088-527: The Lunar Series shows that at least two different methods and formulas were used to calculate the moon's age and position in the six-month cycle ..." which gives eclipse seasons when the Moon is near its ascending or descending node and an eclipse is likely to occur. Dates converted using the GMT correlation agree closely with the Dresden Codex eclipse tables. The Dresden Codex contains

2146-485: The Maya thought there was one before this, and that implies they were comfortable with the idea of another one after this." It is important to know the difference between the Julian and Gregorian calendars when calculating a Western calendar date from a Long Count date. Using as an example the Long Count date of 9.10.11.17.0 (Long Count date mentioned on the Palenque Palace Tablet), first calculate

2204-415: The Maya were using an abbreviated Short Count . Long Count dates are written with Mesoamerican numerals, as shown on this table. A dot represents 1 while a bar equals 5 . The shell glyph was used to represent the zero concept. The Long Count calendar required the use of zero as a place-holder and presents one of the earliest uses of the zero concept in history . On Maya monuments, the Long Count syntax

2262-722: The Yoruba number system may be regarded as a vigesimal system, it is complex. There is some evidence of base-20 usage in the Māori language of New Zealand as seen in the terms Te Hokowhitu a Tu referring to a war party (literally "the seven 20s of Tu") and Tama-hokotahi , referring to a great warrior ("the one man equal to 20"). Open Location Code uses a word-safe version of base 20 for its geocodes . The characters in this alphabet were chosen to avoid accidentally forming words. The developers scored all possible sets of 20 letters in 30 different languages for likelihood of forming words, and chose

2320-459: The discovery in Guatemala of the San Bartolo (Maya site) stone block text ( c. 300 BCE), it has been argued that this text celebrates an upcoming time period ending celebration. This time period may have been projected to end sometime between 7.3.0.0.0 (295 BCE) and 7.5.0.0.0 (256 BCE). Besides being the earliest Maya hieroglyphic text so far uncovered, this would arguably be

2378-573: The earliest evidence to date of Long Count notation in Mesoamerica. The Maya and Western calendars are correlated by using a Julian day number (JDN) of the starting date of the current creation — 13.0.0.0.0, 4 Ajaw , 8 Kumkʼu. This is referred to as a "correlation constant". The generally accepted correlation constant is the Modified Thompson ;2, " Goodman –Martinez– Thompson ", or GMT correlation of 584,283 days. Using

Mesoamerican Long Count calendar - Misplaced Pages Continue

2436-449: The eight oldest Long Count inscriptions according to Dartmouth professor Vincent H. Malmström (two of the artifacts contain two dates and Malmström does not include Takalik Abaj Stela 2). Interpretations of inscriptions on some artifacts differ. GMT (584283) correlation Of the six sites, three are on the western edge of the Maya homeland and three are several hundred kilometers further west, leading some researchers to believe that

2494-466: The extra needed symbols is to write ten as the letter A, or A 20 , where the 20 means base 20 , to write nineteen as J 20 , and the numbers between with the corresponding letters of the alphabet. This is similar to the common computer-science practice of writing hexadecimal numerals over 9 with the letters "A–F". Another less common method skips over the letter "I", in order to avoid confusion between I 20 as eighteen and one , so that

2552-411: The number eighteen is written as J 20 , and nineteen is written as K 20 . The number twenty is written as 10 20 . According to this notation: In the rest of this article below, numbers are expressed in decimal notation, unless specified otherwise. For example, 10 means ten , 20 means twenty . Numbers in vigesimal notation use the convention that I means eighteen and J means nineteen. As 20

2610-418: The number of days that have passed since the zero date (August 11, 3114 BCE; GMT correlation, in the Proleptic Gregorian calendar , September 6, −3113 Julian astronomical). Then add the GMT correlation to the total number of days. This number is a Julian day . To convert a Julian day to a Proleptic Gregorian calendar date: From this number, subtract the nearest smaller Julian Day Number (in

2668-423: The other four characters (the "calendar round date"). Taking as an example a Calendar Round date of 9.12.2.0.16 (Long Count) 5 Kibʼ (Tzolkʼin) 14 Yaxkʼin (Haabʼ). One can check whether this date is correct by the following calculation. Vigesimal In a vigesimal place system, twenty individual numerals (or digit symbols) are used, ten more than in the decimal system. One modern method of finding

2726-512: The precise correlation between the Western calendars and the Long Count calendars. The August 11 date is based on the GMT correlation. The completion of 13 bʼakʼtuns (August 11, 3114 BCE) marks the Creation of the world of human beings according to the Maya. On this day, Raised-up-Sky-Lord caused three stones to be set by associated gods at Lying-Down-Sky, First-Three-Stone-Place. Because

2784-422: The previous creation ended at the end of a 13th bʼakʼtun. The previous creation ended on a Long Count of 12.19.19.17.19. Another 12.19.19.17.19 occurred on December 20, 2012 (Gregorian Calendar), followed by the start of the 14th bʼakʼtun, 13.0.0.0.0, on December 21, 2012. There are only two references to the current creation's 13th bʼakʼtun in the fragmentary Mayan corpus: Tortuguero Monument 6, part of

2842-588: The publicity generated by the 2012 date, Susan Milbrath, curator of Latin American Art and Archaeology at the Florida Museum of Natural History , stated that "We have no record or knowledge that [the Maya] would think the world would come to an end" in 2012. USA Today writes " 'For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle,' says Sandra Noble, executive director of

2900-551: The second digit from the right (and only that digit) rolls over to zero when it reaches 18. Thus 0.0.1.0.0 does not represent 400 days, but rather only 360 days and 0.0.0.17.19 represents 359 days. The name bʼakʼtun was invented by modern scholars. The numbered Long Count was no longer in use by the time the Spanish arrived in the Yucatán Peninsula , although unnumbered kʼatuns and tuns were still in use. Instead

2958-427: The size of the corpus compares unfavorably in comparison with the rate of repetition within the corpus, so that a unique decipherment is simply impossible given the current state of affairs. He goes on in illustrating the principal applicability of readings in random Old and New world languages (including Ancient Greek, Latin, Spanish and German) to demonstrate the coincidental nature of any such proposals. The matter

SECTION 50

#1732776354178

3016-406: The sky still lay on the primordial sea, it was black. The setting of the three stones centered the cosmos which allowed the sky to be raised, revealing the sun. Rather than using a base 10 scheme, the Long Count days were tallied in a modified base-20 scheme. In a pure base 20 scheme, 0.0.0.1.5 is equal to 25 and 0.0.0.2.0 is equal to 40. The Long Count is not pure base-20, however, since

3074-460: The subject, there now is not the slightest chance that these three scholars (conflated to G-M-T when talking about the correlation) were not right ...". The evidence for the GMT correlation is historical, astronomical and archaeological: Historical : Calendar Round dates with a corresponding Julian date are recorded in Diego de Landa 's Relación de las cosas de Yucatán (written circa 1566),

3132-470: The table below), in this case 1,940,206, which corresponds to the year 600 CE. Next, divide this number by 365 days (vague year). The remainder is 44.86849 years, which is 44 years and 317 days. The full year date is 644 CE. Now calculate the month and day number, taking into account leap days over the 44 years. In the Gregorian Calendar, every fourth year is

3190-406: The thin crescent moon. Given our modern ability to know exactly where to look, when the crescent Moon is favorably located, from an excellent site, on rare occasions, using binoculars or a telescope, observers can see and photograph the crescent moon less than one day after conjunction. Generally, most observers cannot see the new Moon with the naked eye until the first evening when the lunar phase day

3248-437: The third method, that stela should show a moon age of 26 days, but in fact it records a new moon. Using the GMT correlation at six AM in the time zone UTC−6, this would be 2.25 days before conjunction, so it could record the first day when one could not see the waning moon. Fuls analysed these inscriptions and found strong evidence for the Palenque system and the GMT correlation; however, he cautioned: "Analysis of

3306-527: The year 4772. The inscription notes that this day would fall eight days after the completion of the 1st piktun (since the creation or zero date of the Long Count system), where the piktun is the next-highest order above the bʼakʼtun in the Long Count. If the completion date of that piktun —13 October 4772—were to be written out in Long Count notation, it could be represented as 1.0.0.0.0.0. The 80th CR anniversary date, eight days later, would be 1.0.0.0.0.8   5 Lamat 1 Mol. Despite

3364-498: Was a member of the Zoquean language family. In 1997, the same two epigraphers published a second paper on Epi-Olmec writing, in which they further claimed that a newly discovered text-section from the stela had yielded readily to the decipherment-system that they had established earlier for the longer section of text. This led to a Guggenheim Fellowship for their work, in 2003. The following year, however, their interpretation of

#177822