Software portability is a design objective for source code to be easily made to run on different platforms . An aid to portability is the generalized abstraction between the application logic and system interfaces . When software with the same functionality is produced for several computing platforms , portability is the key issue for development cost reduction.
49-498: WebAssembly ( Wasm ) defines a portable binary-code format and a corresponding text format for executable programs as well as software interfaces for facilitating communication between such programs and their host environment. The main goal of WebAssembly is to facilitate high-performance applications on web pages , but it is also designed to be usable in non-web environments. It is an open standard intended to support any language on any operating system, and in practice many of
98-546: A WebAssembly binary format ( .wasm ), which is not designed to be used by humans, as well as a human-readable WebAssembly text format ( .wat ) that resembles a cross between S-expressions and traditional assembly languages. The table below shows an example of a factorial function written in C and its corresponding WebAssembly code after compilation, shown both in .wat text format (a human-readable textual representation of WebAssembly) and in .wasm binary format (the raw bytecode , expressed below in hexadecimal ), that
147-453: A WebAssembly-based ABI for extending proxy servers . In November 2017, Mozilla declared support "in all major browsers", after WebAssembly was enabled by default in Edge 16. This support also includes mobile web browsers for iOS and Android. As of March 2024, 99% of tracked web browsers support WebAssembly (version 1.0), more than for its predecessor asm.js . For some extensions, from
196-416: A binary file which runs in the same sandbox as JavaScript code. Emscripten provides bindings for several commonly used environment interfaces like WebGL . As of version 8, a standalone Clang can compile C and C++ to Wasm. Its initial aim was to support compilation from C and C++ , though support for other source languages such as Rust , .NET languages and AssemblyScript ( TypeScript -like)
245-471: A bit over 200. The WebAssembly SIMD proposal (for parallel processing) introduces an alternate opcode prefix (0xfd) for 128-bit SIMD. The concatenation of the SIMD prefix, plus an opcode that is valid after the SIMD prefix, forms a SIMD opcode. The SIMD opcodes bring an additional 236 instructions for the "minimum viable product" (MVP) SIMD capability (for a total of around 436 instructions). Those instructions,
294-492: A common web browser. Such web applications must, for security reasons, have limited control over the host computer, especially regarding reading and writing files. Non-web programs, installed upon a computer in the normal manner, can have more control, and yet achieve system portability by linking to portable libraries providing the same interface on different systems. Software can be compiled and linked from source code for different operating systems and processors if written in
343-681: A native Miner." A June 2019 study from the Technische Universität Braunschweig analyzed the usage of WebAssembly in the Alexa top 1 million websites and found the prevalent use was for malicious crypto mining, and that malware accounted for more than half of the WebAssembly-using websites studied. An April 2021 study from Universität Stuttgart found that since then crypto mining has been marginalized, falling to below 1% of all WebAssembly modules gathered from
392-874: A new v128 datatype, with the ability for functions to return multiple values, and mass memory initialize/copy. While WebAssembly was initially designed to permit near-native code execution speed in the web browser, it has been considered valuable outside of such, in more generalized contexts. Since WebAssembly's runtime environments (RE) are low-level virtual stack machines (akin to JVM or Flash VM ) that may be embedded into host applications, some implementations create standalone runtime environments like Wasmtime [ Wikidata ] and Wasmer [ Wikidata ] . WebAssembly runtime environments are embedded in application servers to host "server-side" WebAssembly applications and in other applications to support plug-in -based software extension architectures, e.g., "WebAssembly for Proxies" (proxy-wasm) which specifies
441-509: A programming language supporting compilation for the platforms. This is usually a task for the program developers; typical users have neither access to the source code nor the required skills. In open-source environments such as Linux the source code is available to all. In earlier days source code was often distributed in a standardised format, and could be built into executable code with a standard Make tool for any particular system by moderately knowledgeable users if no errors occurred during
490-413: A subset of JavaScript, asm.js is largely supported by all major web browsers , unlike alternative approaches such as Google Native Client . asm.js is not typically written directly: instead, as an intermediate language, it is generated through the use of a compiler that takes source code in a language such as C++ and outputs asm.js. For example, given the following C code: Emscripten would output
539-500: A wide range of sources, also including the Alexa top 1 million websites. As WebAssembly supports only structured control flow , it is amenable toward security verification techniques including symbolic execution . WebAssembly System Interface (WASI) is a simple interface ( ABI and API ) designed by Mozilla intended to be portable to any platform. It provides POSIX -like features like file I/O constrained by capability-based security . There are additional proposed ABI/APIs. WASI
SECTION 10
#1732783602392588-417: Is a subset of that specification. However, since features were added in that edition to enable full asm.js support ( Math.fround() ), older browsers lacking those features may encounter problems. Some browser implementations are especially optimised for asm.js: Almost all of the current applications based on asm.js are C/C++ applications compiled to asm.js using Emscripten or Mandreel. With that in mind,
637-517: Is added. Due to this concern, WebAssembly developers put the feature on hold. However, in order to explore these future language extensions, Google Chrome added experimental support for the WebAssembly thread proposal in October 2018. WebAssembly has been criticized for allowing greater ease of hiding the evidence for malware writers, scammers and phishing attackers; WebAssembly is present on
686-771: Is also emerging. After the MVP release, WebAssembly added support for multithreading and garbage collection ( WasmGC , and web browsers including Safari have added support for it), which allowed more efficient compilation for garbage-collecting programming languages like C# (supported via Blazor ), F# (supported via Bolero with help of Blazor) and Python . A number of other languages have some support, including Python , Julia , Ruby and Ring . A number of systems can compile Java and other JVM languages to JavaScript and WebAssembly. These include CheerpJ, JWebAssembly and TeaVM. Kotlin supports WebAssembly directly. Web browsers do not permit WebAssembly code to directly manipulate
735-504: Is designed as a separate module containing collections of various Wasm-defined values and program type definitions. These are provided in either binary or textual format (see below) that have a common structure. Such a module may provide a start function that is executed upon instantiation of a wasm binary. The core standard for the binary format of a Wasm program defines an instruction set architecture (ISA) consisting of specific binary encodings of types of operations which are executed by
784-560: Is due to 100% type consistency and virtually no garbage collection (memory is manually managed in a large typed array). This simpler model with no dynamic behavior, no memory allocation or deallocation, just a narrow set of well-defined integer and floating point operations enables much greater performance and potential for optimization . Mozilla's benchmark from December 2013 showed significant improvements: "Firefox with float32 optimizations can run all those benchmarks at around 1.5× slower than native, or better." Mozilla points out that
833-429: Is executed by a Web browser or run-time environment that supports WebAssembly. All integer constants are encoded using a space-efficient, variable-length LEB128 encoding. The WebAssembly text format is more canonically written in a folded format using S-expressions . For instructions and expressions, this format is purely syntactic sugar and has no behavioral differences with the linear format. Through wasm2wat ,
882-487: Is influenced by CloudABI and Capsicum . Solomon Hykes [ fr ] , a co-founder of Docker , wrote in 2019, "If WASM+WASI existed in 2008, we wouldn't have needed to create Docker. That's how important it is. WebAssembly on the server is the future of computing." The general standard provides core specifications for the JavaScript API and details on embedding. Wasm code (binary code, i.e. bytecode)
931-468: Is intended to be run on a portable virtual stack machine (VM). The VM is designed to be faster to parse and execute than JavaScript and to have compact code representation. Any external functionality (like syscalls ) that may be expected by Wasm binary code is not stipulated by the standard. It rather provides a way to deliver interfacing via modules by the host environment that the VM runs in. A Wasm program
980-459: Is intended to seem synonymous with that of the assembly language . The name suggests bringing assembly-like programming to the Web , where it will be executed client-side — by the website-user's computer via the user's web browser . To accomplish this, WebAssembly must be much more hardware-independent than a true assembly language. WebAssembly was first announced in 2015, and the first demonstration
1029-617: Is mostly rendered obsolete with the introduction of WebAssembly (wasm), which has a bytecode format that is faster to parse. Efforts to extend JavaScript with more low-level features like SIMD.js has also been suspended since 2017. asm.js remains useful primarily as a "fallback" for wasm, through a program written by the WebAssembly organization that converts wasm to asm.js. There is no dedicated converter from asm.js to wasm, but TypeScript -to-wasm compilers can be partially used. The reference WebAssembly emitter Binaryen [ Wikidata ] used to contain an asm2wasm module, but it
SECTION 20
#17327836023921078-603: Is not reliable on Chrome on Android without resorting to Chrome-specific workarounds, nor in Safari on iOS." All major browsers allow WebAssembly if Content-Security-Policy is not specified, or if "unsafe-eval" is used, but behave differently otherwise. Chrome requires "unsafe-eval", though a worker thread can be a workaround. In June 2018, a security researcher presented the possibility of using WebAssembly to circumvent browser mitigations for Spectre and Meltdown security vulnerabilities once support for threads with shared memory
1127-638: Is possible to use a variety of programming languages to make them. This is achieved either through direct compilation to Wasm, or through an implementation of their corresponding virtual machines in Wasm. Some 40 programming languages are reported to support Wasm as a compilation target. Emscripten compiles C and C++ to Wasm using Clang as a frontend, replacing LLVM as backend and using Binaryen [ Wikidata ] as an optimizer. The Emscripten SDK can compile any LLVM -supported languages (such as C , C++ or Rust , among others) source code into
1176-427: Is specifically designed to run on different computers with compatible operating systems and processors, without any machine-dependent installation. Porting is no more than transferring specified directories and their contents. Software installed on portable mass storage devices such as USB sticks can be used on any compatible computer on simply plugging the storage device in, and stores all configuration information on
1225-466: Is such that detailed software operation is different; an application designed to display suitably on a large screen cannot simply be ported to a pocket-sized smartphone with a tiny screen even if the functionality is similar. Web applications are required to be processor independent, so portability can be achieved by using web programming techniques, writing in JavaScript . Such a program can run in
1274-645: The Document Object Model . Wasm code must defer to JavaScript for this. In an October 2023 survey of developers, less than half of the 303 participants were satisfied with the state of WebAssembly. A large majority cited the need for improvement in four areas: WASI, debugging support, integration with JavaScript and browser APIs, and build tooling. For memory-intensive allocations in WebAssembly, there are "grave limitations that make many applications infeasible to be reliably deployed on mobile browsers [..] Currently allocating more than ~300MB of memory
1323-825: The "finalized opcodes" are enabled by default across Google's V8 (in Google Chrome), the SpiderMonkey engine in Mozilla Firefox, and the JavaScriptCore engine in Apple's Safari and there are also some additional proposal for instructions for later "post SIMD MVP", and there's also a separate "relaxed-simd" proposal on the table. These SIMD opcodes are also portable and translate to native instruction sets like x64 and ARM. In contrast, neither Java's JVM nor CIL support SIMD, at their opcode level , i.e. in
1372-538: The 2.0 draft standard, support may be lower, but still more than 90% of web browsers may already support, e.g. for reference types extension. WebAssembly implementations usually use either ahead-of-time (AOT) or just-in-time (JIT) compilation, but may also use an interpreter . While the first implementations have landed in web browsers , there are also non-browser implementations for general-purpose use, including Wasmer, Wasmtime or WAMR, wasm3, WAVM, and many others. Because WebAssembly executables are precompiled, it
1421-415: The VM (without specifying how exactly they must be executed). The list of instructions includes standard memory load/store instructions, numeric, parametric, control of flow instruction types and Wasm-specific variable instructions. The number of opcodes used in the original standard (MVP) was a bit fewer than 200 of the 256 possible opcodes. Subsequent versions of WebAssembly pushed the number of opcodes
1470-475: The build. Some Linux distributions distribute software to users in source form. In these cases there is usually no need for detailed adaptation of the software for the system; it is distributed in a way which modifies the compilation process to match the system . Even with seemingly portable languages like C and C++ , the effort to port source code can vary considerably. The authors of UNIX/32V (1979) reported that "[t]he (Bourne) shell [...] required by far
1519-739: The code above decompiles to: A module is implicitly generated by the compiler. The function is referenced by an entry of the type table in the binary, hence a type section and the type emitted by the decompiler. The compiler and decompiler can be accessed online. [REDACTED] This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under Apache License 2.0 ( license statement/permission ). Text taken from Text Format , jfbastien; rossberg-chromium; kripken; titzer; s3ththompson; sunfishcode; lukewagner; flagxor; enricobacis; c3d; binji; andrewosh, GitHub. WebAssembly/design. Software portability Software portability may involve: When operating systems of
WebAssembly - Misplaced Pages Continue
1568-660: The design of the minimum viable product (MVP) was declared to be finished and the preview phase ended. In late September 2017, Safari 11 was released with support. In February 2018, the WebAssembly Working Group published three public working drafts for the Core Specification, JavaScript Interface, and Web API. In June 2019, Chrome 75 was released with WebAssembly threads enabled by default. Since April 2022, WebAssembly 2.0 has been in draft status, which added many SIMD -related instructions and
1617-524: The following JS code: Note the addition of |0 and the lack of type specifiers. In JavaScript, bitwise operators convert their operands to 32-bit signed integers and give integer results. This means that a bitwise OR with zero converts a value to an integer (a very simple "conceptual" presentation of bitwise operators may not deal with type conversion at all, but every programming language defines operators for its own convenience, as Javascript does here). By doing this for each parameter, this ensures that if
1666-526: The function is called from outside code, the value will be converted to the correct type. This is also used on the return value, in this case to ensure that the result of adding 1 to i will be an integer (as otherwise it could become too large), and to mark the return type of the function. These conversions are required by asm.js, so that an optimising compiler can produce highly efficient native code ahead-of-time. In such an optimising compiler, no conversions are performed when asm.js code calls other asm.js code, as
1715-427: The generated code, the variable MEM8 is actually a byte-by-byte "view" of a typed buffer, which serves as the "heap" of the asm.js code. Since asm.js runs in a browser, the performance heavily depends on both the browser and hardware. Preliminary benchmarks of C programs compiled to asm.js are usually within a factor of 2 slower than native compilation with Clang . Much of this performance gain over normal JavaScript
1764-453: The kind of applications that are going to target asm.js in the near future are those that will benefit from the portability of running in a browser but which have a level of complexity for which a direct port to JavaScript would be infeasible. So far, a number of programming languages , application frameworks , programs , libraries , games , game engines and other software have already been ported . Some of them are given below. asm.js
1813-487: The largest conversion effort of any supposedly portable program, for the simple reason that it is not portable." Sometimes the effort consists of recompiling the source code, but sometimes it is necessary to rewrite major parts of the software. Many language specifications describe implementation defined behaviour (e.g. right shifting a signed integer in C can do a logical or an arithmetic shift). Operating system functions or third party libraries might not be available on
1862-673: The most popular languages already have at least some level of support. Announced in 2015 ( 2015 ) and first released in March ;2017 ( 2017-03 ) , WebAssembly became a World Wide Web Consortium recommendation on 5 December 2019 and it received the Programming Languages Software Award from ACM SIGPLAN in 2021. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) maintains the standard with contributions from Mozilla , Microsoft , Google , Apple , Fastly , Intel , and Red Hat . The name WebAssembly
1911-636: The performance of natively compiled code is not a single measure but rather a range, with different native compilers (in this case Clang and GCC ) delivering code of differing performance. "In fact, on some benchmarks, like Box2D , FASTA and copy, asm.js is as close or closer to Clang than Clang is to GCC. In one case, asm.js even beats Clang by a slight amount on Box2D." The Emscripten project provides tools that can be used to compile C and C++ codebases (or any other languages that can be converted to LLVM IR ) into asm.js. All browsers with support for ECMAScript 6 should be able to run asm.js code, as it
1960-452: The porting effort. In practice the claim of languages, like C and C++ , to have the WOCA ( write once, compile anywhere ) is arguable. Asm.js asm.js is a subset of JavaScript designed to allow computer software written in languages such as C to be run as web applications while maintaining performance characteristics considerably better than standard JavaScript , which is
2009-591: The removable device. Hardware- and software-specific information is often stored in configuration files in specified locations such as the registry on Windows ). Software which is not portable in this sense must be modified much more to support the environment on the destination machine. As of 2011 the majority of desktop and laptop computers used microprocessors compatible with the 32- and 64-bit x86 instruction sets. Smaller portable devices use processors with different and incompatible instruction sets, such as ARM . The difference between larger and smaller devices
WebAssembly - Misplaced Pages Continue
2058-411: The required type specifiers mean it is guaranteed that values will already have the correct type. Furthermore, rather than performing a floating-point addition and converting to an integer, it can simply do a native integer operation. Together, this leads to significant performance benefits. Here is another example to calculate the length of a string: This would result in the following asm.js code: In
2107-645: The same family are installed on two computers with processors with similar instruction sets it is often possible to transfer the files implementing program files between them. In the simplest case, the file or files may simply be copied from one machine to the other. However, in many cases, the software is installed on a computer in a way which depends upon its detailed hardware, software, and setup, with device drivers for particular devices, using installed operating system and supporting software components, and using different drives or directories . In some cases, software, usually described as " portable software ",
2156-529: The standard; both do have some parallel APIs which provide SIMD speedup. There is an extension for Java adding intrinsics for x64 SIMD, that isn't portable, i.e. not usable on ARM or smartphones. Smartphones can support SIMD by calling assembly code with SIMD, and C# has similar support. In March 2017, the WebAssembly Community Group reached consensus on the initial (MVP) binary format, JavaScript API, and reference interpreter. It defines
2205-401: The target system. Some functions can be available on a target system, but exhibit slightly different behavior such as utime() fails under Windows with EACCES, when it is called for a directory). The program code can contain unportable things, like the paths of include files, drive letters, or the backslash. Implementation defined things like byte order and the size of an int can also raise
2254-445: The typical language used for such applications. asm.js consists of a strict subset of JavaScript, to which code written in statically typed languages with manual memory management (such as C) is translated by a source-to-source compiler such as Emscripten (based on LLVM ). Performance is improved by limiting language features to those amenable to ahead-of-time optimization and other performance improvements. Mozilla Firefox
2303-409: The user's machine only in its compiled form, which "[makes malware] detection difficult". Speed and the easy ability to conceal in WebAssembly have led to its use in hidden crypto mining within the website visitor's device. Coinhive , a now defunct service facilitating cryptocurrency mining in website visitors' browsers, claims their "miner uses WebAssembly and runs with about 65% of the performance of
2352-512: Was executing Unity 's Angry Bots in Firefox , Google Chrome , and Microsoft Edge . The precursor technologies were asm.js from Mozilla and Google Native Client , and the initial implementation was based on the feature set of asm.js. The asm.js file already provides near-native code execution speeds and can be considered a viable alternative for browsers that do not support WebAssembly or have it disabled for security reasons. In March 2017,
2401-587: Was the first web browser to implement asm.js-specific optimizations, starting with version 22. asm.js is superseded by WebAssembly . asm.js enables significant performance improvements for web applications , but does not aim to improve the performance of hand-written JavaScript code, nor does it enable anything other than enhanced performance. It is intended to have performance characteristics closer to that of native code than standard JavaScript by limiting language features to those amenable to ahead-of-time optimization and other performance improvements. By using
#391608