Misplaced Pages

Many-worlds interpretation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The many-worlds interpretation ( MWI ) is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that asserts that the universal wavefunction is objectively real , and that there is no wave function collapse . This implies that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in different "worlds". The evolution of reality as a whole in MWI is rigidly deterministic and local . Many-worlds is also called the relative state formulation or the Everett interpretation , after physicist Hugh Everett , who first proposed it in 1957. Bryce DeWitt popularized the formulation and named it many-worlds in the 1970s.

#779220

174-622: In modern versions of many-worlds, the subjective appearance of wave function collapse is explained by the mechanism of quantum decoherence . Decoherence approaches to interpreting quantum theory have been widely explored and developed since the 1970s. MWI is considered a mainstream interpretation of quantum mechanics , along with the other decoherence interpretations, the Copenhagen interpretation , and hidden variable theories such as Bohmian mechanics . The many-worlds interpretation implies that there are many parallel, non-interacting worlds. It

348-533: A Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics at the University of Bristol free of charge. He was permitted to skip the first year of the course owing to his engineering degree. Under the influence of Peter Fraser, whom Dirac called the best mathematics teacher, he had the most interest in projective geometry, and began applying it to the geometrical version of relativity Minkowski developed. In 1923, Dirac graduated, once again with first class honours, and received

522-458: A mathematical theory of great beauty and power, needing quite a high standard of mathematics for one to understand it. You may wonder: Why is nature constructed along these lines? One can only answer that our present knowledge seems to show that nature is so constructed. We simply have to accept it. One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing

696-496: A "highly unscientific" poll taken at a 1997 quantum mechanics workshop. According to Tegmark, "The many worlds interpretation (MWI) scored second, comfortably ahead of the consistent histories and Bohm interpretations ." Quantum decoherence Quantum decoherence is the loss of quantum coherence . Quantum decoherence has been studied to understand how quantum systems convert to systems which can be explained by classical mechanics. Beginning out of attempts to extend

870-540: A Korean physicist, Y. S. Kim , who met and was influenced by Dirac, also says: "It is quite fortunate for the physics community that Manci took good care of our respected Paul A. M. Dirac. Dirac published eleven papers during the period 1939–46. Dirac was able to maintain his normal research productivity only because Manci was in charge of everything else". Dirac was known among his colleagues for his precise and taciturn nature. His colleagues in Cambridge jokingly defined

1044-453: A PhD in physics in 1926, writing the first ever thesis on quantum mechanics. Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics , coining the latter term. Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation in 1928, which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter , which is one of

1218-721: A branching tree, where each branch is a set of all the states relative to each other. Bryce DeWitt popularized Everett's work with a series of publications calling it the Many Worlds Interpretation. Focusing on the splitting process, DeWitt introduced the term "world" to describe a single branch of that tree, which is a consistent history. All observations or measurements within any branch are consistent within themselves. Since many observation-like events have happened and are constantly happening, Everett's model implies that there are an enormous and growing number of simultaneously existing states or "worlds". MWI removes

1392-408: A coherent superposition and interfering them, a task currently beyond experimental capability. Since the many-worlds interpretation's inception, physicists have been puzzled about the role of probability in it. As put by Wallace, there are two facets to the question: the incoherence problem , which asks why we should assign probabilities at all to outcomes that are certain to occur in some worlds, and

1566-630: A conference in Japan in August 1929. "Both still in their twenties, and unmarried, they made an odd couple. Heisenberg was a ladies' man who constantly flirted and danced, while Dirac—'an Edwardian geek', as biographer Graham Farmelo puts it—suffered agonies if forced into any kind of socializing or small talk. 'Why do you dance?' Dirac asked his companion. 'When there are nice girls, it is a pleasure,' Heisenberg replied. Dirac pondered this notion, then blurted out: 'But, Heisenberg, how do you know beforehand that

1740-431: A conference, one colleague raised his hand and said: "I don't understand the equation on the top-right-hand corner of the blackboard". After a long silence, the moderator asked Dirac if he wanted to answer the question, to which Dirac replied: "That was not a question, it was a comment." Dirac was also noted for his personal modesty. He called the equation for the time evolution of a quantum-mechanical operator, which he

1914-497: A conversation among young participants at the 1927 Solvay Conference about Einstein and Planck 's views on religion between Wolfgang Pauli , Heisenberg and Dirac. Dirac's contribution was a criticism of the political purpose of religion, which Bohr regarded as quite lucid when hearing it from Heisenberg later. Among other things, Heisenberg imagined that Dirac might say: I don't know why we are discussing religion. If we are honest—and scientists have to be—we must admit that religion

SECTION 10

#1732801836780

2088-589: A derivation of the Born rule based on the symmetries of entangled states; Schlosshauer and Fine argue that Zurek's derivation is not rigorous, as it does not define what probability is and has several unstated assumptions about how it should behave. In 2016, Charles Sebens and Sean M. Carroll , building on work by Lev Vaidman , proposed a similar approach based on self-locating uncertainty. In this approach, decoherence creates multiple identical copies of observers, who can assign credences to being on different branches using

2262-535: A divorcee. Dirac raised Margit's two children, Judith and Gabriel , as if they were his own. Paul and Margit Dirac also had two daughters together, Mary Elizabeth and Florence Monica. Margit, known as Manci, had visited her brother in 1934 in Princeton, New Jersey , from their native Hungary and, while at dinner at the Annex Restaurant, met the "lonely-looking man at the next table". This account from

2436-400: A god, and such a god would probably be showing his influence in the quantum jumps which are taking place later on. On the other hand, if life can start very easily and does not need any divine influence, then I will say that there is no god. Dirac did not commit himself to any definite view, but he described the possibilities for scientifically answering the question of God. Dirac discovered

2610-535: A greater impact on modern physics than Einstein, while Stanley Deser remarked that "We all stand on Dirac's shoulders." Dirac is widely considered to be on par with Sir Isaac Newton , James Clerk Maxwell , and Einstein. Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac was born at his parents' home in Bristol , England, on 8 August 1902, and grew up in the Bishopston area of the city. His father, Charles Adrien Ladislas Dirac,

2784-466: A measurement is a "primitive" concept, not describable by unitary quantum mechanics; using the Copenhagen interpretation the universe is divided into a quantum and a classical domain, and the collapse postulate is central. In MWI there is no division between classical and quantum: everything is quantum and there is no collapse. MWI's main conclusion is that the universe (or multiverse in this context)

2958-543: A new quantum theory was taken late in September 1925. Ralph Fowler , his research supervisor, had received a proof copy of an exploratory paper by Werner Heisenberg in the framework of the old quantum theory of Bohr and Sommerfeld . Heisenberg leaned heavily on Bohr's correspondence principle but changed the equations so that they involved directly observable quantities, leading to the matrix formulation of quantum mechanics. Fowler sent Heisenberg's paper on to Dirac, who

3132-457: A particle)—the claim that either the observer or the observed has a well-defined state is meaningless; in modern parlance, the observer and the observed have become entangled: we can only specify the state of one relative to the other, i.e., the state of the observer and the observed are correlated after the observation is made. This led Everett to derive from the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone (i.e., without assuming wave function collapse)

3306-493: A point in 3-dimensional space. This has analogies with the classical phase space . A classical phase space contains a real-valued function in 6 N dimensions (each particle contributes 3 spatial coordinates and 3 momenta). In this case a "quantum" phase space, on the other hand, involves a complex-valued function on a 3 N -dimensional space. The position and momenta are represented by operators that do not commute , and ψ {\displaystyle \psi } lives in

3480-597: A proper subject began in 1970, with H. Dieter Zeh's paper "On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory". Zeh regarded the wavefunction as a physical entity, rather than a calculational device or a compendium of statistical information (as is typical for Copenhagen-type interpretations), and he proposed that it should evolve unitarily, in accord with the Schrödinger equation, at all times. Zeh

3654-540: A quantum gamble: the agent makes a measurement on a quantum system, branches as a consequence, and each of the agent's future selves receives a reward that depends on the measurement result. The agent uses decision theory to evaluate the price they would pay to take part in such a gamble, and concludes that the price is given by the utility of the rewards weighted according to the Born rule. Some reviews have been positive, although these arguments remain highly controversial; some theoretical physicists have taken them as supporting

SECTION 20

#1732801836780

3828-514: A quantum leap from ψ {\displaystyle \psi } to ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } after ψ {\displaystyle \psi } has interacted with its environment, then application of the Born probability rule states that we must sum over all the relevant possible states | ϵ i ⟩ {\displaystyle |\epsilon _{i}\rangle } of

4002-592: A relativistic phenomenon. The necessity of fermions (matter) being created and destroyed in Enrico Fermi 's 1934 theory of beta decay led to a reinterpretation of Dirac's equation as a "classical" field equation for any point particle of spin ħ /2, itself subject to quantisation conditions involving anti-commutators . Thus reinterpreted, in 1934 by Werner Heisenberg , as a (quantum) field equation accurately describing all elementary matter particles – today quarks and leptons – this Dirac field equation

4176-411: A simpler way; the aim of poetry is to state simple things in an incomprehensible way. The two are incompatible." Dirac himself wrote in his diary during his postgraduate years that he concentrated solely on his research, and stopped only on Sunday when he took long strolls alone. An anecdote recounted in a review of the 2009 biography tells of Werner Heisenberg and Dirac sailing on an ocean liner to

4350-516: A state with a precise value for the measured attributes, relative to that element. This provides one explanation of how the Born rule coefficients effectively act as probabilities as per the measurement postulate constituting a solution to the quantum measurement problem. Using Dirac notation , let the system initially be in the state where the | i ⟩ {\displaystyle |i\rangle } s form an einselected basis ( environmentally induced selected eigenbasis ), and let

4524-436: A sum of elements in a quantum superposition. Each expansion corresponds to a projection of the wave vector onto a basis. The basis can be chosen at will. Choosing an expansion where the resulting basis elements interact with the environment in an element-specific way, such elements will—with overwhelming probability—be rapidly separated from each other by their natural unitary time evolution along their own independent paths. After

4698-414: A superposition of two delocalized states. The assumption is that the preferred basis to use is the one which assigns a unique measurement outcome to each world. This special role for measurements is problematic for the theory, as it contradicts Everett and DeWitt's goal of having a reductionist theory and undermines their criticism of the ill-defined measurement postulate of the Copenhagen interpretation. This

4872-416: A system are calculated by applying the Born rule to the quantum state describing that system. Quantum states are either pure or mixed ; pure states are also known as wavefunctions . Assigning a pure state to a quantum system implies certainty about the outcome of some measurement on that system, i.e., that there exists a measurement for which one of the possible outcomes will occur with probability 1. In

5046-647: A theory or metatheory , rather than just an interpretation. Everett argued that it was the "only completely coherent approach to explaining both the contents of quantum mechanics and the appearance of the world." Deutsch dismissed the idea that many-worlds is an "interpretation", saying that to call it an interpretation "is like talking about dinosaurs as an 'interpretation' of fossil records." In his 1957 doctoral dissertation, Everett proposed that, rather than relying on external observation for analysis of isolated quantum systems, one could mathematically model an object, as well as its observers, as purely physical systems within

5220-407: A unit called a "dirac", which was one word per hour. When Niels Bohr complained that he did not know how to finish a sentence in a scientific article he was writing, Dirac replied, "I was taught at school never to start a sentence without knowing the end of it." He criticised the physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer 's interest in poetry: "The aim of science is to make difficult things understandable in

5394-539: A very short interaction, there is almost no chance of further interference. The process is effectively irreversible . The different elements effectively become "lost" from each other in the expanded phase space created by coupling with the environment. In phase space, this decoupling is monitored through the Wigner quasi-probability distribution . The original elements are said to have decohered . The environment has effectively selected out those expansions or decompositions of

Many-worlds interpretation - Misplaced Pages Continue

5568-601: A wide array of phenomena. Dirac was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge from 1932 to 1969. He conceived the Helikon vortex isotope separation process in 1934. In 1937, he proposed a speculative cosmological model based on the large numbers hypothesis . During World War II, he conducted important theoretical work on uranium enrichment by gas centrifuge . He introduced

5742-669: A young woman, where she worked as a librarian at the Bristol Central Library ; despite this she still considered her identity to be Cornish rather than English. Paul had a younger sister, Béatrice Isabelle Marguerite, known as Betty, and an older brother, Reginald Charles Félix, known as Felix, who died by suicide in March 1925. Dirac later recalled: "My parents were terribly distressed. I didn't know they cared so much ... I never knew that parents were supposed to care for their children, but from then on I knew." Charles and

5916-569: A £140 scholarship from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research . Along with his £70 scholarship from St John's College, this was enough to live at Cambridge. There, Dirac pursued his interests in the theory of general relativity , an interest he had gained earlier as a student in Bristol, and in the nascent field of quantum physics , under the supervision of Ralph Fowler . From 1925 to 1928 he held an 1851 Research Fellowship from

6090-421: Is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions. I can't for

6264-470: Is a landmark in the history of science . It quickly became one of the standard textbooks on the subject and is still used today. In that book, Dirac incorporated the previous work of Werner Heisenberg on matrix mechanics and of Erwin Schrödinger on wave mechanics into a single mathematical formalism that associates measurable quantities to operators acting on the Hilbert space of vectors that describe

6438-469: Is almost certain that life would not have started. And I feel that under those conditions it will be necessary to assume the existence of a god to start off life. I would like, therefore, to set up this connection between the existence of a god and the physical laws: if physical laws are such that to start off life involves an excessively small chance so that it will not be reasonable to suppose that life would have started just by blind chance, then there must be

6612-610: Is as central to theoretical physics as the Maxwell , Yang–Mills and Einstein field equations. Dirac is regarded as the founder of quantum electrodynamics , being the first to use that term. He also introduced the idea of vacuum polarisation in the early 1930s. This work was key to the development of quantum mechanics by the next generation of theorists, in particular Schwinger , Feynman , Sin-Itiro Tomonaga and Dyson in their formulation of quantum electrodynamics. Dirac's The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , published in 1930,

6786-406: Is as yet no evidence of this. As with the other interpretations of quantum mechanics, the many-worlds interpretation is motivated by behavior that can be illustrated by the double-slit experiment . When particles of light (or anything else) pass through the double slit, a calculation assuming wavelike behavior of light can be used to identify where the particles are likely to be observed. Yet when

6960-399: Is called "environmentally induced superselection", or einselection. The advantage of taking the partial trace is that this procedure is indifferent to the environmental basis chosen. Initially, the density matrix of the combined system can be denoted as where | ϵ ⟩ {\displaystyle |\epsilon \rangle } is the state of the environment. Then if

7134-508: Is composed of a quantum superposition of an uncountable or undefinable amount or number of increasingly divergent, non-communicating parallel universes or quantum worlds. Sometimes dubbed Everett worlds, each is an internally consistent and actualized alternative history or timeline. The many-worlds interpretation uses decoherence to explain the measurement process and the emergence of a quasi-classical world. Wojciech H. Zurek , one of decoherence theory 's pioneers, said: "Under scrutiny of

Many-worlds interpretation - Misplaced Pages Continue

7308-466: Is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it is small – not neglecting it just because it is infinitely great and you do not want it!" His refusal to accept renormalisation resulted in his work on the subject moving increasingly out of the mainstream. Shin'ichirō Tomonaga , Schwinger and Feynman mastered this approach, producing a QED with unprecedented accuracy, resulting formal recognition by an award of

7482-461: Is known today as the preferred basis problem . The preferred basis problem has been solved, according to Saunders and Wallace, among others, by incorporating decoherence into the many-worlds theory. In this approach, the preferred basis does not have to be postulated, but rather is identified as the basis stable under environmental decoherence. In this way measurements no longer play a special role; rather, any interaction that causes decoherence causes

7656-504: Is one of a number of multiverse hypotheses in physics and philosophy . MWI views time as a many-branched tree, wherein every possible quantum outcome is realized. This is intended to resolve the measurement problem and thus some paradoxes of quantum theory , such as Wigner's friend , the EPR paradox and Schrödinger's cat , since every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in its own world. The many-worlds interpretation's key idea

7830-475: Is seen as having anticipated string theory , with his work on the Dirac membrane and Dirac–Born–Infeld action , both of which he proposed in a 1962 paper, along with other contributions. He also developed a general theory of the quantum field with dynamical constraints, which forms the basis of the gauge theories and superstring theories of today. Shortly after Wolfgang Pauli proposed his Pauli exclusion principle that two electrons cannot occupy

8004-434: Is shorthand for the tensor product | i ⟩ ⊗ | ϵ ⟩ {\displaystyle |i\rangle \otimes |\epsilon \rangle } . There are two extremes in the way the system can interact with its environment: either (1) the system loses its distinct identity and merges with the environment (e.g. photons in a cold, dark cavity get converted into molecular excitations within

8178-438: Is that the linear and unitary dynamics of quantum mechanics applies everywhere and at all times and so describes the whole universe. In particular, it models a measurement as a unitary transformation, a correlation-inducing interaction, between observer and object, without using a collapse postulate , and models observers as ordinary quantum-mechanical systems. This stands in contrast to the Copenhagen interpretation , in which

8352-432: Is the cat, the poison vial and the observer. One relative triple of states would be the alive cat, the unbroken vial and the observer seeing an alive cat. Another relative triple of states would be the dead cat, the broken vial and the observer seeing a dead cat. In the example of a measurement of a continuous variable (e.g., position q ) the object-observer system decomposes into a continuum of pairs of relative states:

8526-447: Is the earliest known reference to many-worlds; Jeffrey A. Barrett describes it as indicating the similarity of "general views" between Everett and Schrödinger. Schrödinger's writings from the period also contain elements resembling the modal interpretation originated by Bas van Fraassen . Because Schrödinger subscribed to a kind of post- Machian neutral monism , in which "matter" and "mind" are only different aspects or arrangements of

8700-407: Is the probability of observing the system making a transition from ψ {\displaystyle \psi } to ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } before ψ {\displaystyle \psi } has interacted with its environment, then application of the Born probability rule states that the transition probability is the squared modulus of

8874-514: Is yet empirically adequate for describing all of reality, given its lack of unification with general relativity , and so do not see a reason to regard any interpretation of quantum mechanics as the final word in metaphysics . They also suggest that the multiple branches may be an artifact of incomplete descriptions and of using quantum mechanics to represent the states of macroscopic objects. They argue that macroscopic objects are significantly different from microscopic objects in not being isolated from

SECTION 50

#1732801836780

9048-460: The Dirac equation as a relativistic equation of motion for the wave function of the electron . This work led Dirac to predict the existence of the positron , the electron's antiparticle , which he interpreted in terms of what came to be called the Dirac sea . The positron was observed by Carl Anderson in 1932. Dirac's equation also contributed to explaining the origin of quantum spin as

9222-504: The Heisenberg picture of quantum theory; his primary point in the article was that the Schrödinger model does not work for this purpose. In 1928, building on 2×2 spin matrices which he purported to have discovered independently of Wolfgang Pauli 's work on non-relativistic spin systems (Dirac told Abraham Pais , "I believe I got these [matrices] independently of Pauli and possibly Pauli got these independently of me."), he proposed

9396-575: The Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 . He completed his PhD in June 1926 with the first thesis on quantum mechanics to be submitted anywhere. He then continued his research in Copenhagen and Göttingen . In the spring of 1929, he was a visiting professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison . In 1937, Dirac married Margit Wigner, a sister of physicist Eugene Wigner and

9570-464: The University of Cambridge , a professor of physics at Florida State University , and a 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics recipient. Dirac graduated from the University of Bristol with a first class honours Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering in 1921, and a first class honours Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics in 1923. Dirac then graduated from the University of Cambridge with

9744-450: The linearity of quantum mechanics, which underpins the superposition principle . If the final theory of everything is non-linear with respect to wavefunctions, then many-worlds is invalid. All quantum field theories are linear and compatible with the MWI, a point Everett emphasized as a motivation for the MWI. While quantum gravity or string theory may be non-linear in this respect, there

9918-487: The measurement problem , decoherence provides an explanation for the transition of the system to a mixture of states that seem to correspond to those states observers perceive. Moreover, observation indicates that this mixture looks like a proper quantum ensemble in a measurement situation, as the measurements lead to the "realization" of precisely one state in the "ensemble". The philosophical views of Werner Heisenberg and Niels Bohr have often been grouped together as

10092-408: The partial trace of the joint system's density matrix, i.e. the trace , with respect to any environmental basis, of the density matrix of the combined system and its environment. The decoherence irreversibly converts the "averaged" or "environmentally traced-over" density matrix from a pure state to a reduced mixture; it is this that gives the appearance of wave-function collapse . Again, this

10266-474: The quantisation rules in a novel and more illuminating manner . For this work, published in 1926, Dirac received a PhD from Cambridge. This formed the basis for Fermi–Dirac statistics that applies to systems consisting of many identical spin 1/2 particles (i.e. that obey the Pauli exclusion principle ), e.g. electrons in solids and liquids, and importantly to the field of conduction in semi-conductors . Dirac

10440-432: The quantitative problem , which asks why the probabilities should be given by the Born rule . Everett tried to answer these questions in the paper that introduced many-worlds. To address the incoherence problem, he argued that an observer who makes a sequence of measurements on a quantum system will in general have an apparently random sequence of results in their memory, which justifies the use of probabilities to describe

10614-681: The separative work unit (SWU) in 1941. He contributed to the Tube Alloys project , the British programme to research and construct atomic bombs during World War II. Dirac's quantum electrodynamics (QED) included terms with infinite self-energy . A workaround known as renormalisation was developed, but Dirac never accepted this. "I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation", he said in 1975, "because this so-called 'good theory' does involve neglecting infinities which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This

SECTION 60

#1732801836780

10788-432: The " Copenhagen interpretation ", despite significant divergences between them on important points. In 1955, Heisenberg suggested that the interaction of a system with its surrounding environment would eliminate quantum interference effects. However, Heisenberg did not provide a detailed account of how this might transpire, nor did he make explicit the importance of entanglement in the process. Nevill Mott 's solution to

10962-401: The "quantum nature" of systems. Next, the density matrix approach is presented for perspective. An N -particle system can be represented in non-relativistic quantum mechanics by a wave function ψ ( x 1 , x 2 , … , x N ) {\displaystyle \psi (x_{1},x_{2},\dots ,x_{N})} , where each x i is

11136-482: The Born rule based on a frequentist interpretation of probability. They try to show that in the limit of uncountably many measurements, no worlds would have relative frequencies that didn't match the probabilities given by the Born rule, but these derivations have been shown to be mathematically incorrect. A decision-theoretic derivation of the Born rule was produced by David Deutsch (1999) and refined by Wallace and Saunders. They consider an agent who takes part in

11310-401: The Born rule. The Sebens–Carroll approach has been criticized by Adrian Kent , and Vaidman does not find it satisfactory. In 2021, Simon Saunders produced a branch counting derivation of the Born rule. The crucial feature of this approach is to define the branches so that they all have the same magnitude or 2-norm . The ratios of the numbers of branches thus defined give the probabilities of

11484-688: The Nobel Prize for physics. In the 1950s in his search for a better QED, Paul Dirac developed the Hamiltonian theory of constraints based on lectures that he delivered at the 1949 International Mathematical Congress in Canada. Dirac had also solved the problem of putting the Schwinger–Tomonaga equation into the Schrödinger representation and given explicit expressions for the scalar meson field ( spin zero pion or pseudoscalar meson ),

11658-459: The absence of outside forces or interactions, a quantum state evolves unitarily over time. Consequently, a pure quantum state remains pure. However, if the system is not perfectly isolated, for example during a measurement, coherence is shared with the environment and appears to be lost with time ─ a process called quantum decoherence or environmental decoherence. The quantum coherence is not lost but rather mixed with many more degrees of freedom in

11832-411: The arbitrariness or vagueness of the collapse postulate to the question of when "worlds" can be regarded as separate, and that no objective criterion for that separation can actually be formulated. A poll of 72 "leading quantum cosmologists and other quantum field theorists" conducted before 1991 by L. David Raub showed 58% agreement with "Yes, I think MWI is true". Max Tegmark reports the result of

12006-493: The case for parallel universes. For example, a New Scientist story on a 2007 conference about Everettian interpretations quoted physicist Andy Albrecht as saying, "This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science." In contrast, the philosopher Huw Price , also attending the conference, found the Deutsch–Wallace–Saunders approach fundamentally flawed. In 2005, Zurek produced

12180-413: The case when transition takes place after the interaction of the system with the environment. The combined density matrix will be To get the reduced density matrix of the system, we trace out the environment and employ the decoherence/einselection condition and see that the off-diagonal terms vanish (a result obtained by Erich Joos and H. D. Zeh in 1985): Similarly, the final reduced density matrix after

12354-411: The cavity walls), or (2) the system is not disturbed at all, even though the environment is disturbed (e.g. the idealized non-disturbing measurement). In general, an interaction is a mixture of these two extremes that we examine. If the environment absorbs the system, each element of the total system's basis interacts with the environment such that and so The unitarity of time evolution demands that

12528-480: The children were officially Swiss nationals until they became naturalised on 22 October 1919. Dirac's father was strict and authoritarian, although he disapproved of corporal punishment. Dirac had a strained relationship with his father, so much so that after his father's death, Dirac wrote, "I feel much freer now, and I am my own man." Charles forced his children to speak to him only in French so that they might learn

12702-601: The combined system plus environment evolves in a unitary fashion). Thus the dynamics of the system alone are irreversible . As with any coupling, entanglements are generated between the system and environment. These have the effect of sharing quantum information with—or transferring it to—the surroundings. An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum physics might correspond to experienced reality . Decoherence calculations can be done in any interpretation of quantum mechanics, since those calculations are an application of

12876-431: The components of a quantum system entangle with other quantum systems within the same environment. That is, components of the wave function are decoupled from a coherent system and acquire phases from their immediate surroundings. A total superposition of the global or universal wavefunction still exists (and remains coherent at the global level), but its ultimate fate remains an interpretational issue . With respect to

13050-516: The double-slit experiment in his reply to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox , work he had undertaken with Bill Wootters , and he has since argued that decoherence brings a kind of rapprochement between Everettian and Copenhagen-type views. Decoherence does not claim to provide a mechanism for some actual wave-function collapse; rather it puts forth a reasonable framework for the appearance of wave-function collapse. The quantum nature of

13224-563: The earliest papers on quantum computing, Deutsch suggested that parallelism that results from MWI could lead to "a method by which certain probabilistic tasks can be performed faster by a universal quantum computer than by any classical restriction of it". He also proposed that MWI will be testable (at least against "naive" Copenhagenism) when reversible computers become conscious via the reversible observation of spin. Philosophers of science James Ladyman and Don Ross say that MWI could be true, but do not embrace it. They note that no quantum theory

13398-446: The entrance examination for St John's College, Cambridge . He passed and was awarded a £70 scholarship, but this fell short of the amount of money required to live and study at Cambridge. Despite having graduated with a first class honours Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering, the economic climate of the post-war depression was such that he was unable to find work as an engineer. Instead, he took up an offer to study for

13572-424: The environment before squaring the modulus: The internal summation vanishes when we apply the decoherence/einselection condition ⟨ ϵ i | ϵ j ⟩ ≈ δ i j {\displaystyle \langle \epsilon _{i}|\epsilon _{j}\rangle \approx \delta _{ij}} , and the formula simplifies to If we compare this with

13746-506: The environment initially be in the state | ϵ ⟩ {\displaystyle |\epsilon \rangle } . The vector basis of the combination of the system and the environment consists of the tensor products of the basis vectors of the two subsystems. Thus, before any interaction between the two subsystems, the joint state can be written as where | i ⟩ | ϵ ⟩ {\displaystyle |i\rangle |\epsilon \rangle }

13920-436: The environment, analogous to the way energy appears to be lost in by friction in classical mechanics when it actually has produced heat in the environment. Decoherence can be viewed as the loss of information from a system into the environment (often modeled as a heat bath ), since every system is loosely coupled with the energetic state of its surroundings. Viewed in isolation, the system's dynamics are non-unitary (although

14094-427: The environment, and that using quantum formalism to describe them lacks explanatory and descriptive power and accuracy. Some scientists consider some aspects of MWI to be unfalsifiable and hence unscientific because the multiple parallel universes are non-communicating, in the sense that no information can be passed between them. Victor J. Stenger remarked that Murray Gell-Mann 's published work explicitly rejects

14268-409: The environment, only pointer states remain unchanged. Other states decohere into mixtures of stable pointer states that can persist, and, in this sense, exist: They are einselected." Zurek emphasizes that his work does not depend on a particular interpretation. The many-worlds interpretation shares many similarities with the decoherent histories interpretation, which also uses decoherence to explain

14442-424: The environment. The converse is not true: not all entangled states are decohered from each other. Any measuring device or apparatus acts as an environment, since at some stage along the measuring chain, it has to be large enough to be read by humans. It must possess a very large number of hidden degrees of freedom. In effect, the interactions may be considered to be quantum measurements. As a result of an interaction,

14616-448: The environmentally defined measurement observable. For a complex environmental interaction (which would be expected for a typical macroscale interaction) a non-einselected basis would be hard to define. The utility of decoherence lies in its application to the analysis of probabilities, before and after environmental interaction, and in particular to the vanishing of quantum interference terms after decoherence has occurred. If we ask what

14790-407: The equations of motion. There are four constraints or weak equations for each point of the surface x 0 {\displaystyle x^{0}} = constant. Three of them H r {\displaystyle H_{r}} form the four vector density in the surface. The fourth H L {\displaystyle H_{L}} is a 3-dimensional scalar density in

14964-426: The existence of a classical domain beyond the one described by quantum mechanics, it has been criticized as inadequate for the study of cosmology. While there is no evidence that Everett was inspired by issues of cosmology, he developed his theory with the explicit goal of allowing quantum mechanics to be applied to the universe as a whole, hoping to stimulate the discovery of new phenomena. This hope has been realized in

15138-445: The existence of simultaneous parallel universes. Collaborating with James Hartle , Gell-Mann worked toward the development of a more "palatable" post-Everett quantum mechanics . Stenger thought it fair to say that most physicists find MWI too extreme, though it "has merit in finding a place for the observer inside the system being analyzed and doing away with the troublesome notion of wave function collapse". Roger Penrose argues that

15312-401: The forces of nature, alongside creating quantum electrodynamics and coining the term. He proposed and investigated the concept of a magnetic monopole , an object not yet known empirically, as a means of bringing even greater symmetry to James Clerk Maxwell 's equations of electromagnetism . Dirac also coined the terms " fermion " and " boson ". Throughout his career, Dirac was motivated by

15486-586: The formula we derived before the environment introduced decoherence, we can see that the effect of decoherence has been to move the summation sign ∑ i {\displaystyle \textstyle \sum _{i}} from inside of the modulus sign to outside. As a result, all the cross- or quantum interference -terms have vanished from the transition-probability calculation. The decoherence has irreversibly converted quantum behaviour (additive probability amplitudes ) to classical behaviour (additive probabilities). However, Ballentine shows that

15660-490: The foundations for Richard Feynman 's development of a completely new approach to quantum mechanics, the path integral formulation . In a 1963 paper, Dirac initiated the study of field theory on anti-de Sitter space (AdS) . The paper contains the mathematics of combining special relativity with the quantum mechanics of quarks inside hadrons, and lays the foundations of two-mode squeezed states that are essential to modern quantum optics , though Dirac did not realize it at

15834-409: The girls are nice? ' " Margit Dirac told both George Gamow and Anton Capri in the 1960s that her husband had said to a house visitor, "Allow me to present Wigner's sister, who is now my wife." Another story told of Dirac is that when he first met the young Richard Feynman at a conference, he said after a long silence, "I have an equation. Do you have one too?" After he presented a lecture at

16008-516: The gravitational field. His work laid the foundations for canonical quantum gravity . In his 1959 lecture at the Lindau Meetings , Dirac discussed why gravitational waves have "physical significance". Dirac predicted gravitational waves would have well defined energy density in 1964. Dirac reintroduced the term " graviton " in a number of lectures in 1959, noting that the energy of the gravitational field should come in quanta. Dirac

16182-476: The iconic Mott problem in 1929 is considered in retrospect to be the first quantum decoherence work. It was cited by the first modern theoretical treatment. Although he did not use the term, the concept of quantum decoherence was first introduced in 1951 by the American physicist David Bohm , who called it the "destruction of interference in the process of measurement". Bohm later used decoherence to handle

16356-756: The idea is flawed because it is based on an oversimplified version of quantum mechanics that does not account for gravity. In his view, applying conventional quantum mechanics to the universe implies the MWI, but the lack of a successful theory of quantum gravity negates the claimed universality of conventional quantum mechanics. According to Penrose, "the rules must change when gravity is involved". He further asserts that gravity helps anchor reality and "blurry" events have only one allowable outcome: "electrons, atoms, molecules, etc., are so minute that they require almost no amount of energy to maintain their gravity, and therefore their overlapping states. They can stay in that state forever, as described in standard quantum theory". On

16530-444: The idea: "I do not believe that we have to live with the many-worlds interpretation. Indeed, it would be a stupendous number of parallel worlds, which are only there because physicists couldn't decide which of them is real." Asher Peres was an outspoken critic of MWI. A section of his 1993 textbook had the title Everett's interpretation and other bizarre theories . Peres argued that the various many-worlds interpretations merely shift

16704-435: The illusion that a kindly God rewards—in heaven if not on earth—all those who have not risen up against injustice, who have done their duty quietly and uncomplainingly. That is precisely why the honest assertion that God is a mere product of the human imagination is branded as the worst of all mortal sins. Heisenberg's view was tolerant. Pauli, raised as a Catholic, had kept silent after some initial remarks, but when finally he

16878-517: The language. When Dirac found that he could not express what he wanted to say in French, he chose to remain silent. Dirac was educated first at Bishop Road Primary School and then at the all-boys Merchant Venturers' Technical College (later Cotham School ), where his father was a French teacher. The school was an institution attached to the University of Bristol , which shared grounds and staff. It emphasised technical subjects like bricklaying, shoemaking and metalwork, and modern languages. This

17052-444: The last condition is trivial, since the disturbed environment is not a function of i {\displaystyle i} , and we have the trivial disturbed environment basis | ϵ j ⟩ = | ϵ ′ ⟩ {\displaystyle |\epsilon _{j}\rangle =|\epsilon '\rangle } . This would correspond to the system basis being degenerate with respect to

17226-446: The later development of quantum cosmology . MWI is a realist , deterministic and local theory. It achieves this by removing wave function collapse, which is indeterministic and nonlocal, from the deterministic and local equations of quantum theory. MWI (like other, broader multiverse theories) provides a context for the anthropic principle , which may provide an explanation for the fine-tuned universe . MWI depends crucially on

17400-428: The life of me see how the postulate of an Almighty God helps us in any way. What I do see is that this assumption leads to such unproductive questions as to why God allows so much misery and injustice, the exploitation of the poor by the rich, and all the other horrors He might have prevented. If religion is still being taught, it is by no means because its ideas still convince us, but simply because some of us want to keep

17574-403: The literal reality of the other quantum worlds. His son and wife reported that he "never wavered in his belief over his many-worlds theory". In their detailed review of Everett's work, Osnaghi, Freitas, and Freire Jr. note that Everett consistently used quotes around "real" to indicate a meaning within scientific practice. MWI's initial reception was overwhelmingly negative, in the sense that it

17748-507: The lower classes quiet. Quiet people are much easier to govern than clamorous and dissatisfied ones. They are also much easier to exploit. Religion is a kind of opium that allows a nation to lull itself into wishful dreams and so forget the injustices that are being perpetrated against the people. Hence the close alliance between those two great political forces, the State and the Church. Both need

17922-518: The many-worlds theory, the first experimenter would end up in a macroscopic superposition of seeing one result of the measurement in one branch, and another result in another branch. The second experimenter could then interfere these two branches in order to test whether it is in fact in a macroscopic superposition or has collapsed into a single branch, as predicted by the Copenhagen interpretation. Since then Lockwood, Vaidman, and others have made similar proposals, which require placing macroscopic objects in

18096-471: The mass in the theory of Abraham-Lorentz electron, leading to the Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac force , which is the relativistic-classical electron model; however, this model has solutions that suggest force increase exponentially with time. Fermi's golden rule , the formula for computing quantum transitions in time dependent systems, declared a "golden rule" by Enrico Fermi , was derived by Dirac. Dirac

18270-401: The mathematical framework developed by Paul Dirac , John von Neumann , and others, discarding altogether the ad hoc mechanism of wave function collapse . Everett's original work introduced the concept of a relative state . Two (or more) subsystems, after a general interaction, become correlated , or as is now said, entangled . Everett noted that such entangled systems can be expressed as

18444-470: The mathematical structure of a Hilbert space. Aside from these differences, however, the rough analogy holds. Different previously isolated, non-interacting systems occupy different phase spaces. Alternatively we can say that they occupy different lower-dimensional subspaces in the phase space of the joint system. The effective dimensionality of a system's phase space is the number of degrees of freedom present, which—in non-relativistic models—is 6 times

18618-541: The measurement process in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum theory. The significance of decoherence was further highlighted in 1970 by the German physicist H. Dieter Zeh , and it has been a subject of active research since the 1980s. Decoherence has been developed into a complete framework, but there is controversy as to whether it solves the measurement problem , as the founders of decoherence theory admit in their seminal papers. The study of decoherence as

18792-516: The measurement process. To address the quantitative problem, Everett proposed a derivation of the Born rule based on the properties that a measure on the branches of the wave function should have. His derivation has been criticized as relying on unmotivated assumptions. Since then several other derivations of the Born rule in the many-worlds framework have been proposed. There is no consensus on whether this has been successful. DeWitt and Graham and Farhi et al., among others, have proposed derivations of

18966-459: The most important equations in physics, and is regarded by some physicists as the "real seed of modern physics". He wrote a famous paper in 1931, which further predicted the existence of antimatter. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger for "the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory ". He was the youngest ever theoretician to win the prize until T. D. Lee in 1957. Dirac also contributed greatly to

19140-407: The notion of a relativity of states . Everett noticed that the unitary, deterministic dynamics alone entailed that after an observation is made each element of the quantum superposition of the combined subject–object wave function contains two "relative states": a "collapsed" object state and an associated observer who has observed the same collapsed outcome; what the observer sees and the state of

19314-401: The number of a system's free particles. For a macroscopic system this will be a very large dimensionality. When two systems (the environment being one system) start to interact, though, their associated state vectors are no longer constrained to the subspaces. Instead the combined state vector time-evolves a path through the "larger volume", whose dimensionality is the sum of the dimensions of

19488-409: The object have become correlated by the act of measurement or observation. The subsequent evolution of each pair of relative subject–object states proceeds with complete indifference as to the presence or absence of the other elements, as if wave function collapse has occurred, which has the consequence that later observations are always consistent with the earlier observations. Thus the appearance of

19662-514: The object system's relative state becomes a Dirac delta function each centered on a particular value of q and the corresponding observer relative state representing an observer having recorded the value of q . The states of the pairs of relative states are, post measurement, correlated with each other. In Everett's scheme, there is no collapse; instead, the Schrödinger equation , or its quantum field theory , relativistic analog, holds all

19836-435: The object's wave function's collapse has emerged from the unitary, deterministic theory itself. (This answered Einstein's early criticism of quantum theory: that the theory should define what is observed, not for the observables to define the theory.) Since the wave function appears to have collapsed then, Everett reasoned, there was no need to actually assume that it had collapsed. And so, invoking Occam's razor , he removed

20010-403: The observer-dependent role in the quantum measurement process by replacing wave function collapse with the established mechanism of quantum decoherence . As the observer's role lies at the heart of all "quantum paradoxes" such as the EPR paradox and von Neumann's "boundary problem", this provides a clearer and easier approach to their resolution. Since the Copenhagen interpretation requires

20184-541: The ontology derived from decoherence. Wallace contends that decoherence theory depends not on probability but only on the notion that one is allowed to do approximations in physics. MWI originated in Everett's Princeton University PhD thesis "The Theory of the Universal Wave Function ", developed under his thesis advisor John Archibald Wheeler , a shorter summary of which was published in 1957 under

20358-403: The original state vector that decohere (or lose phase coherence) with each other. This is called "environmentally-induced superselection", or einselection . The decohered elements of the system no longer exhibit quantum interference between each other, as in a double-slit experiment . Any elements that decohere from each other via environmental interactions are said to be quantum-entangled with

20532-604: The other hand, "in the case of large objects, the duplicate states disappear in an instant due to the fact that these objects create a large gravitational field". Philosopher of science Robert P. Crease says that MWI is "one of the most implausible and unrealistic ideas in the history of science" because it means that everything conceivable happens. Science writer Philip Ball calls MWI's implications fantasies, since "beneath their apparel of scientific equations or symbolic logic, they are acts of imagination, of 'just supposing ' ". Theoretical physicist Gerard 't Hooft also dismisses

20706-421: The particles are observed in this experiment, they appear as particles (i.e., at definite places) and not as non-localized waves. Some versions of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed a process of "collapse" in which an indeterminate quantum system would probabilistically collapse onto, or select, just one determinate outcome to "explain" this phenomenon of observation. Wave function collapse

20880-443: The past: It could be that it is extremely difficult to start life . It might be that it is so difficult to start a life that it has happened only once among all the planets... Let us consider, just as a conjecture, that the chance of life starting when we have got suitable physical conditions is 10 . I don't have any logical reason for proposing this figure, I just want you to consider it as a possibility. Under those conditions ... it

21054-454: The physical sciences. Since in this approach the worlds are derived, it follows that they must be present in any other interpretation of quantum mechanics that does not have a collapse mechanism, such as Bohmian mechanics. This approach to deriving the preferred basis has been criticized as creating circularity with derivations of probability in the many-worlds interpretation, as decoherence theory depends on probability and probability depends on

21228-420: The postulate of wave function collapse from the theory. In 1985, David Deutsch proposed a variant of the Wigner's friend thought experiment as a test of many-worlds versus the Copenhagen interpretation. It consists of an experimenter (Wigner's friend) making a measurement on a quantum system in an isolated laboratory, and another experimenter (Wigner) who would make a measurement on the first one. According to

21402-422: The principles of mathematical beauty , with Peter Goddard stating that "Dirac cited mathematical beauty as the ultimate criterion for selecting the way forward in theoretical physics". Dirac was recognised for being mathematically gifted, as during his time in university, academics had affirmed that Dirac had an "ability of the highest order in mathematical physics", with Ebenezer Cunningham stating that Dirac

21576-490: The process of uranium enrichment and the gas centrifuge , and whose work was deemed to be "probably the most important theoretical result in centrifuge technology". He also contributed to cosmology , putting forth his large numbers hypothesis . Dirac also anticipated string theory well before its inception, with work such as the Dirac membrane and Dirac–Born–Infeld action , along with other contributions important to modern-day string and gauge theories. Dirac

21750-477: The process of measurement or wave function collapse. MWI treats the other histories or worlds as real, since it regards the universal wave function as the "basic physical entity" or "the fundamental entity, obeying at all times a deterministic wave equation". The decoherent histories interpretation, on the other hand, needs only one of the histories (or worlds) to be real. Several authors, including Everett, John Archibald Wheeler and David Deutsch , call many-worlds

21924-424: The reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics. His 1930 monograph, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , is one of the most influential texts on quantum mechanics. Dirac's contributions were not restricted to quantum mechanics. He contributed to the Tube Alloys project , the British programme to research and construct atomic bombs during World War II. Dirac made fundamental contributions to

22098-413: The relativistic equation for the electron, which now bears his name. The remarkable notion of an antiparticle to each fermion particle – e.g. the positron as antiparticle to the electron – stems from his equation. He is credited as being the one to create quantum field theory , which underlies all theoretical work on sub-atomic or "elementary" particles today, work that is fundamental to our understanding of

22272-425: The same common elements, treating the wave function as physical and treating it as information became interchangeable. Leon Cooper and Deborah Van Vechten developed a very similar approach before reading Everett's work. Zeh also came to the same conclusions as Everett before reading his work, then built a new theory of quantum decoherence based on these ideas. According to people who knew him, Everett believed in

22446-465: The same quantum energy level, Enrico Fermi and Dirac both realized the principle would dramatically alter the statistical mechanics of electron systems. This work became the basis for Fermi–Dirac statistics . Dirac wrote an influential paper in 1933 regarding the Lagrangian in quantum mechanics. The paper served as the basis for Julian Schwinger and his quantum action principle , and laid

22620-573: The scalar product of the two states: where ψ i = ⟨ i | ψ ⟩ {\displaystyle \psi _{i}=\langle i|\psi \rangle } , ψ i ∗ = ⟨ ψ | i ⟩ {\displaystyle \psi _{i}^{*}=\langle \psi |i\rangle } , and ϕ i = ⟨ i | ϕ ⟩ {\displaystyle \phi _{i}=\langle i|\phi \rangle } etc. The above expansion of

22794-409: The scalar product sense. If the measuring device has many degrees of freedom, it is very unlikely for this to happen. As a consequence, the system behaves as a classical statistical ensemble of the different elements rather than as a single coherent quantum superposition of them. From the perspective of each ensemble member's measuring device, the system appears to have irreversibly collapsed onto

22968-428: The significant impact of decoherence to reduce interference need not have significance for the transition of quantum systems to classical limits. In terms of density matrices, the loss of interference effects corresponds to the diagonalization of the "environmentally traced-over" density matrix. The effect of decoherence on density matrices is essentially the decay or rapid vanishing of the off-diagonal elements of

23142-423: The standard mathematical tools of quantum theory. However, the subject of decoherence has been closely related to the problem of interpretation throughout its history. Decoherence has been used to understand the possibility of the collapse of the wave function in quantum mechanics. Decoherence does not generate actual wave-function collapse. It only provides a framework for apparent wave-function collapse, as

23316-550: The state of a physical system . The book also introduced the Dirac delta function . Following his 1939 article, he also included the bra–ket notation in the third edition of his book, thereby contributing to its universal use nowadays. In 1931, Dirac proposed that the existence of a single magnetic monopole in the universe would suffice to explain the quantisation of electrical charge. No such monopole has been detected, despite numerous attempts and preliminary claims. (see also Searches for magnetic monopoles ). Dirac quantised

23490-407: The subsystems interact, their states have become correlated or entangled and can no longer be considered independent. In Everett's terminology, each subsystem state was now correlated with its relative state , since each subsystem must now be considered relative to the other subsystems with which it has interacted. In the example of Schrödinger's cat , after the box is opened, the entangled system

23664-465: The sum of products of states, where the two or more subsystems are each in a state relative to each other. After a measurement or observation one of the pair (or triple...) is the measured, object or observed system, and one other member is the measuring apparatus (which may include an observer) having recorded the state of the measured system. Each product of subsystem states in the overall superposition evolves over time independently of other products. Once

23838-556: The suppression of the interference terms when applying Born's probability rules to the system). Criticism of the adequacy of decoherence theory to solve the measurement problem has been expressed by Anthony Leggett . To examine how decoherence operates, an "intuitive" model is presented below. The model requires some familiarity with quantum theory basics. Analogies are made between visualizable classical phase spaces and Hilbert spaces . A more rigorous derivation in Dirac notation shows how decoherence destroys interference effects and

24012-495: The surface H L ≈ 0; H r ≈ 0 ( r = 1, 2, 3) In the late 1950s, he applied the Hamiltonian methods he had developed to cast Einstein's general relativity in Hamiltonian form and to bring to a technical completion the quantisation problem of gravitation and bring it also closer to the rest of physics according to Salam and DeWitt. In 1959 he also gave an invited talk on "Energy of the Gravitational Field" at

24186-441: The surface on which the state is considered. The g m 0 {\displaystyle g_{m0}} ( m = 0, 1, 2, 3) appear in the theory only through the variables g r 0 {\displaystyle g^{r0}} , ( − g 00 ) − 1 / 2 {\displaystyle (-{g^{00}})^{-1/2}} which occur as arbitrary coefficients in

24360-395: The system disturbs the environment, but is itself undisturbed by the environment. In this case, each element of the basis interacts with the environment such that and so In this case, unitarity demands that where ⟨ ϵ i | ϵ i ⟩ = 1 {\displaystyle \langle \epsilon _{i}|\epsilon _{i}\rangle =1}

24534-449: The system into sets of relative states, where each set of relative states, forming a branch of the universal wave function, is consistent within itself, and all future measurements (including by multiple observers) will confirm this consistency. Everett had referred to the combined observer–object system as split by an observation, each split corresponding to the different or multiple possible outcomes of an observation. These splits generate

24708-461: The system is simply entangled into the environment so that a total superposition of the wave function still exists, but exists—at least for all practical purposes—beyond the realm of measurement. By definition, the claim that a merged but unmeasurable wave function still exists cannot be proven experimentally. Decoherence is needed to understand why a quantum system begins to obey classical probability rules after interacting with its environment (due to

24882-404: The theory. One of MWI's strongest longtime advocates is David Deutsch. According to him, the single photon interference pattern observed in the double slit experiment can be explained by interference of photons in multiple universes. Viewed this way, the single photon interference experiment is indistinguishable from the multiple photon interference experiment. In a more practical vein, in one of

25056-442: The time, everywhere. An observation or measurement is modeled by applying the wave equation to the entire system, comprising the object being observed and the observer. One consequence is that every observation causes the combined observer–object's wavefunction to change into a quantum superposition of two or more non-interacting branches. Thus the process of measurement or observation, or any correlation-inducing interaction, splits

25230-432: The time, his memory of Poisson brackets was rather vague, but he found E. T. Whittaker 's Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies illuminating. From his new understanding, he developed a quantum theory based on non-commuting dynamical variables. This led him to the most profound and significant general formulation of quantum mechanics to date. His novel formulation using Dirac brackets allowed him to obtain

25404-473: The time. Dirac previously worked on AdS during the 1930s, publishing a paper in 1935. In 1930, Victor Weisskopf and Eugene Wigner published their famous and now standard calculation of spontaneous radiation emission in atomic and molecular physics. Remarkably, in a letter to Niels Bohr in February 1927, Dirac had come to the same calculation, but he did not publish it. In 1938, Dirac renormalized

25578-445: The title "Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics" (Wheeler contributed the title "relative state"; Everett originally called his approach the "Correlation Interpretation", where "correlation" refers to quantum entanglement). The phrase "many-worlds" is due to Bryce DeWitt, who was responsible for the wider popularization of Everett's theory, which had been largely ignored for a decade after publication in 1957. Everett's proposal

25752-414: The total state basis remains orthonormal , i.e. the scalar or inner products of the basis vectors must vanish, since ⟨ i | j ⟩ = δ i j {\displaystyle \langle i|j\rangle =\delta _{ij}} : This orthonormality of the environment states is the defining characteristic required for einselection. In an idealized measurement,

25926-778: The transition happens before any interaction takes place between the system and the environment, the environment subsystem has no part and can be traced out , leaving the reduced density matrix for the system: Now the transition probability will be given as where ψ i = ⟨ i | ψ ⟩ {\displaystyle \psi _{i}=\langle i|\psi \rangle } , ψ i ∗ = ⟨ ψ | i ⟩ {\displaystyle \psi _{i}^{*}=\langle \psi |i\rangle } , and ϕ i = ⟨ i | ϕ ⟩ {\displaystyle \phi _{i}=\langle i|\phi \rangle } etc. Now

26100-411: The transition probability has terms that involve i ≠ j {\displaystyle i\neq j} ; these can be thought of as representing interference between the different basis elements or quantum alternatives. This is a purely quantum effect and represents the non-additivity of the probabilities of quantum alternatives. To calculate the probability of observing the system making

26274-409: The transition will be Paul Dirac Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac ( / d ɪ ˈ r æ k / ; 8 August 1902 – 20 October 1984) was an English mathematical and theoretical physicist who is considered to be one of the founders of quantum mechanics . Dirac laid the foundations for both quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory . He was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at

26448-510: The two subspaces. The extent to which two vectors interfere with each other is a measure of how "close" they are to each other (formally, their overlap or Hilbert space multiplies together) in the phase space. When a system couples to an external environment, the dimensionality of, and hence "volume" available to, the joint state vector increases enormously. Each environmental degree of freedom contributes an extra dimension. The original system's wave function can be expanded in many different ways as

26622-429: The understanding of quantum mechanics, the theory has developed in several directions and experimental studies have confirmed some of the key issues. Quantum computing relies on quantum coherence and is one of the primary practical applications of the concept. In quantum mechanics , physical systems are described by a mathematical representation called a quantum state . Probabilities for the outcomes of experiments upon

26796-406: The universe. Our feeble attempts at mathematics enable us to understand a bit of the universe, and as we proceed to develop higher and higher mathematics we can hope to understand the universe better. In 1971, at a conference meeting, Dirac expressed his views on the existence of God. Dirac explained that the existence of God could be justified only if an improbable event were to have taken place in

26970-425: The various outcomes of a measurement, in accordance with the Born rule. As originally formulated by Everett and DeWitt, the many-worlds interpretation had a privileged role for measurements: they determined which basis of a quantum system would give rise to the eponymous worlds. Without this the theory was ambiguous, as a quantum state can equally well be described (e.g.) as having a well-defined position or as being

27144-522: The vector meson field (spin one rho meson), and the electromagnetic field (spin one massless boson, photon). The Hamiltonian of constrained systems is one of Dirac's many masterpieces. It is a powerful generalisation of Hamiltonian theory that remains valid for curved spacetime. The equations for the Hamiltonian involve only six degrees of freedom described by g r s {\displaystyle g_{rs}} , p r s {\displaystyle p^{rs}} for each point of

27318-400: The wave functions of the system and the measuring device become entangled with each other. Decoherence happens when different portions of the system's wave function become entangled in different ways with the measuring device. For two einselected elements of the entangled system's state to interfere, both the original system and the measuring in both elements device must significantly overlap, in

27492-408: The world to split. Since decoherence is never complete, there will always remain some infinitesimal overlap between two worlds, making it arbitrary whether a pair of worlds has split or not. Wallace argues that this is not problematic: it only shows that worlds are not a part of the fundamental ontology, but rather of the emergent ontology, where these approximate, effective descriptions are routine in

27666-427: Was "quite the most original student I have met in the subject of mathematical physics". Therefore, Dirac was known for his "astounding physical intuition combined with the ability to invent new mathematics to create new physics". During his career, Dirac made numerous important contributions to mathematical subjects, including the Dirac delta function , Dirac algebra and the Dirac operator . Dirac's first step into

27840-524: Was an immigrant from Saint-Maurice, Switzerland , of French descent, who worked in Bristol as a French teacher. His mother, Florence Hannah Dirac, née Holten, was born to a Cornish Methodist family in Liskeard , Cornwall . She was named after Florence Nightingale by her father, a ship's captain, who had met Nightingale while he was a soldier during the Crimean war. His mother moved to Bristol as

28014-509: Was asked for his opinion, said: "Well, our friend Dirac has got a religion and its guiding principle is 'There is no God, and Paul Dirac is His prophet. ' " Everybody, including Dirac, burst into laughter. Later in life, Dirac wrote an article mentioning God that appeared in the May 1963 edition of Scientific American , Dirac wrote: It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of

28188-409: Was famously not bothered by issues of interpretation in quantum theory . In fact, in a paper published in a book in his honour, he wrote: "The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been dealt with by many authors, and I do not want to discuss it here. I want to deal with more fundamental things." However, in 1964 he wrote a short article about the interpretation of quantum field theory when based on

28362-429: Was ignored, with the notable exception of DeWitt. Wheeler made considerable efforts to formulate the theory in a way that would be palatable to Bohr, visited Copenhagen in 1956 to discuss it with him, and convinced Everett to visit as well, which happened in 1959. Nevertheless, Bohr and his collaborators completely rejected the theory. Everett had already left academia in 1957, never to return, and in 1980, Wheeler disavowed

28536-447: Was initially unaware of Hugh Everett III 's earlier work, which also proposed a universal wavefunction evolving unitarily; he revised his paper to reference Everett after learning of Everett's "relative-state interpretation" through an article by Bryce DeWitt . (DeWitt was the one who termed Everett's proposal the many-worlds interpretation , by which name it is commonly known.) For Zeh, the question of how to interpret quantum mechanics

28710-453: Was not without precedent. In 1952, Erwin Schrödinger gave a lecture in Dublin in which at one point he jocularly warned his audience that what he was about to say might "seem lunatic". He went on to assert that while the Schrödinger equation seemed to be describing several different histories, they were "not alternatives but all really happen simultaneously". According to David Deutsch, this

28884-542: Was of key importance, and an interpretation along the lines of Everett's was the most natural. Partly because of a general disinterest among physicists for interpretational questions, Zeh's work remained comparatively neglected until the early 1980s, when two papers by Wojciech Zurek invigorated the subject. Unlike Zeh's publications, Zurek's articles were fairly agnostic about interpretation, focusing instead on specific problems of density-matrix dynamics. Zurek's interest in decoherence stemmed from furthering Bohr's analysis of

29058-471: Was on vacation in Bristol, asking him to look into this paper carefully. Dirac's attention was drawn to a mysterious mathematical relationship, at first sight unintelligible, that Heisenberg had established. Several weeks later, back in Cambridge, Dirac suddenly recognised that this mathematical form had the same structure as the Poisson brackets that occur in the classical dynamics of particle motion. At

29232-456: Was regarded by his friends and colleagues as unusual in character. In a 1926 letter to Paul Ehrenfest , Albert Einstein wrote of a Dirac paper, "I am toiling over Dirac. This balancing on the dizzying path between genius and madness is awful." In another letter concerning the Compton effect he wrote, "I don't understand the details of Dirac at all." In 1987, Abdus Salam declared that "Dirac

29406-416: Was the first to write down, the "Heisenberg equation of motion". Most physicists speak of Fermi–Dirac statistics for half-integer-spin particles and Bose–Einstein statistics for integer-spin particles. While lecturing later in life, Dirac always insisted on calling the former "Fermi statistics". He referred to the latter as "Bose statistics" for reasons, he explained, of "symmetry". Heisenberg recollected

29580-407: Was the one to initiate the development of time-dependent perturbation theory in his early work on semi-classical atoms interacting with an electromagnetic field. Dirac, with Werner Heisenberg , John Archibald Wheeler , Richard Feynman, and Freeman Dyson ultimately developed this concept into an invaluable tool for modern physics, used in the calculation of the properties of any physical system and

29754-420: Was undoubtedly one of the greatest physicists of this or any century . . . No man except Einstein has had such a decisive influence, in so short a time, on the course of physics in this century." In 1995, Stephen Hawking stated that "Dirac has done more than anyone this century, with the exception of Einstein, to advance physics and change our picture of the universe". Antonino Zichichi asserted that Dirac had

29928-558: Was unusual at a time when secondary education in Britain was still dedicated largely to the classics, and something for which Dirac would later express his gratitude. Dirac studied electrical engineering on a City of Bristol University Scholarship at the University of Bristol's engineering faculty, which was co-located with the Merchant Venturers' Technical College. Shortly before he completed his degree in 1921, he sat for

30102-473: Was used. Additionally , decoherence requires, by virtue of the large number of hidden degrees of freedom in the environment, that As before, this is the defining characteristic for decoherence to become einselection. The approximation becomes more exact as the number of environmental degrees of freedom affected increases. Note that if the system basis | i ⟩ {\displaystyle |i\rangle } were not an einselected basis, then

30276-409: Was widely regarded as artificial and ad hoc , so an alternative interpretation in which the behavior of measurement could be understood from more fundamental physical principles was considered desirable. Everett's PhD work provided such an interpretation. He argued that for a composite system—such as a subject (the "observer" or measuring apparatus) observing an object (the "observed" system, such as

#779220